[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 116 KB, 600x600, RAF_SIMONS_Adidas.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7121206 No.7121206[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Have any of the people who copped these got them yet?

>> No.7121237

Man I'm so pissed. I don't get paid for another week and I know that sale is going to be over when I do

>> No.7121270

What is that sale everybody is talking about?

>> No.7121277

>>7121270
hanon shop and crooked tongues
most good colours and common sizes are sold out

>> No.7121281

>>7121270
Hanon-shop, CrookedTongues.
Raf x Adidas for 70 quids

>> No.7121289

>tfw no other sales
>tfw lost a pair on ebay last night

Might just have to shell out for a pair.
Gonna wait a while longer to see if there are any other sales though.

>> No.7121313

>>7121277
Which are the good, sold-out colorways?

>> No.7121324

>>7121313
u decide B)

>> No.7121331

How do these fit? True to size?

>> No.7121335

>>7121313
the ones i like hehe
if the ones you like are still there u should get them

>> No.7121344

>>7121331
small

>> No.7121345

>>7121335
The ones I like are 1 size to small, would I be able to fit them? :(

Also, did you get a pair? Show me the ones you like, which are sold out, I'd like to see what I missed out on (I don't suppose they had all colorways)

>> No.7121346

>>7121331
the general consensus seems to be to size up by a half if you can but also tts would work but slightly snug
i talked to a guy in a shop and he said most customers find them to be tts so i dunno

>> No.7121349

>wearing high fashion shoes
>wearing mountain climbing shoes
>buying shoes with more than 3 colors

LYL.
Who's going to be the first fuccboi to say "BUT IT'S A RAFFFFF"

>> No.7121354

>>7121349

Confirmed for no swag

>> No.7121356

>>7121345
probably not :(

i got these
>>7114287

>> No.7121355
File: 8 KB, 197x256, asdasfsdf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7121355

Would I be able to fit a pair that's half a size too small?

Wish I had heard about this earlier

>> No.7121357

>>7121349
great, another shitty newtrip trying to le trik people, how refreshing

>> No.7121361

>>7121349
i agree w you m8
they remind me of the cheap knock off sneakers i wore when i was in elementary school :/

>> No.7121362

>>7121349
>high fashion
lol

>> No.7121367

god these are so ugly

they look like someone an autstic 8 year old would wear, and not in a good way

>> No.7121378

>>7121367
shut up its satire you just don't understand

>> No.7121383

>>7121378
>wearing clothes ironically

oh god please kill yourself

>> No.7121390

>>7121383
when did he say that
who even refers to 'irony' in 2013

>> No.7121389

>>7121367

I don't think the people wearing them are doing so ironically. I think sometimes people just like a little ugly or awkward in their clothes and accessories. It makes things interesting.

>> No.7121399

>>7121390
"satire" implies that he's wearing rafs to mock people who wear non-raf shoes that look like rafs, because these people are seen as being unfashionable, so he's only wearing them ironically, not because he thinks they actually look good

>> No.7121405

>>7121399
the guy who said satire was obviously mocking people who like them
they aren't satirical, but they do show influence from trainers traditionally considered ugly
this doesn't mean that people wearing these find them ugly or are wearing them ironically

>> No.7121410

>>7121405
how could you NOT find them ugly? i get that people have different standards and all, but cmon, even the plebbiest of the Asics wearing plebs would call those shoes hideous

>> No.7121413

>>7121410
> how could you NOT find them ugly? i
uhhh i like the way they look

>> No.7121418

>>7121413
i find this incredibly hard to believe

>> No.7121424

>>7121418
lol well that sounds a bit autistic mate no offence
but cool as long as you're happy but i hope you don't lose sleep at night knowing that someone likes something you don't like
i fucking hate mushrooms but i'm not gonna tell everyone who likes them that they are only eating them ironically

>> No.7121435

>>7121424
>i fucking hate mushrooms but i'm not gonna tell everyone who likes them that they are only eating them ironically

how is that similar at all? you don't buy mushrooms for $350 and eat them in public and match them with other food on your plate

>> No.7121440

pretty effay for RUNNING
but seriously, who cares what you wear when you work out
the 15€ running shoes they sell in lidl (which is walmart of EU or something) won't destroy your feet

>> No.7121444

>>7121435
well you do match flavours when you're cooking a meal lol
but anyway that's not what i'm saying brother.
i'm saying just because you find something so repulsive that you can't understand the appeal doesn't mean someone else is wrong for digging it :)

>> No.7121451

>>7121418

I hate this style of thinking in the arts.

>"if i dont enjoy it then there's no possible way anyone could genuinely enjoy it"

>> No.7121463

>>7121418
You're probably the kind of person that thinks "ugly" sounds in music can't be used to create something pleasurable to listen to.

>> No.7121486

>>7121463
what does this even mean? give me some examples

>> No.7121517

>>7121486

I assume the anon is talking about achromatic music, syncopation, ambient sound, distortion, etc.

>> No.7121530
File: 405 KB, 698x2404, w.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7121530

I've had mine for a while.

>> No.7121536

>>7121530

I wouldn't mind the high-low concept of this is the jacket had some actual interest or cut to it. Think like Balenciaga egg coats, but in puffer form? Or even just something boxy, but slightly cropped.

>> No.7121537

>>7121530
mentallydeficientpeopleonafieldtrip-core

>> No.7121538

>>7121530
Forgot to say that I bought a second pair from the hanon sale, because they are so beautiful.

>> No.7121544

>>7121530

were you intentionally trying to look like a plonker?

>> No.7121641

>>7121530
i dig this
would be better if the trackies were slimmer at the bottom too tho

>> No.7121651
File: 8 KB, 527x419, in a new world.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7121651

>>7121530
this is a joke rite

its gott b a joke

rite

>> No.7121663
File: 45 KB, 480x640, 41raf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7121663

a guy on sufu is selling these in 41 for 200 euros

http://supertalk.superfuture.com/index.php/topic/152232-fs-givenchy-en-noir-raf-simons-prada-kenzo/

>> No.7121668

>>7121530
slavcore.

>> No.7121669

>>7121663
i had something that looked like those when i was 5

>> No.7121679

>>7121663
u can find those for $150 on y!jp

>> No.7121675

>>7121651
dude, save your drawings as pngs
jpg artifacts are very un-/fa/

>> No.7121676

>>7121651

>> No.7121684
File: 135 KB, 788x1024, 001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7121684

>>7121675
>Not appreciating the irony in artifacts

>> No.7121753

>>7121669
nxt lvl 5 year old goob ninja

>> No.7121934

>>7121679
Thx

>> No.7123117

>>7121753
How is this gothninja at all?

>> No.7123588
File: 1.47 MB, 3032x2560, 1382487270593.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7123588

>> No.7123648

>>7121530
You are legitimately fucked in the head.

>> No.7123701
File: 208 KB, 730x475, tumblr_mmlju9JCeD1qm2e7zo1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7123701

>> No.7123720

>>7123588
I don't like. I'm not a fan of these with jeans.

>> No.7123737
File: 371 KB, 1280x853, adidas-x-raf-simons-springsummer-2014-collection-derriuspierrecom-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7123737

Thinking about copping pic related.

>> No.7123758

>>7123737
W2C

>> No.7123781

>>7123758
>adidas-x-raf-simons-springsummer-2014-collection-derriuspierrecom-1.jpg
>springsummer-2014
>2014

>> No.7123787

>>7123737
go-go power rangers.

just get regular rafdidas.

>> No.7123805

>>7123737
I like shoes like these. Any more similar? Gotta add to my collection...

>> No.7123807

>>7123737
that pink band around it is just too much.

>> No.7123816

>>7123781
Don't have file names on mobile : p

>> No.7123827

>>7121663
i like these because raf has managed to literally incoporate everything i dont want in a shoe except branding into one shoe. if it said "raf/adidas" all over it it would be the perfect opposite shoe of what i would potentially want

>> No.7123832

>>7123807
you can rotate it to the back of the shoe.

>> No.7123836

>>7121530
huehuehue

>> No.7123843

>>7123737
cop. Buy one for your mom too

>> No.7123900

>>7121435
he is just expressing his opinion on these shoes because, UNDER /FA/ standards, (pls don't start that bullshit of "hurr durr, who said we have pleb standards" because you fucking do since every time someone posts a fit all you guys do is say how horrible it is) this shoes are disgusting and I myself find it amusing that you guys like it taking into account these standards.

>> No.7124590
File: 1.75 MB, 788x2649, hans.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7124590

>>7121684

>Not quoting "got to church"
>wtfareyoudoing.jpg

>> No.7124603

jesus christ these are disgusting looking.

I honestly don't get the appeal at all. They *legitimately* look like something autists wear.

>> No.7124611

>>7124603

I have never seen anybody, autistic or otherwise, wearing these or styles quite like this, so I have a hard time seeing where you're coming from.

I do see how they can be off-putting, but I also can imagine how they would add an unexpected, tweaked athletic note to a certain type of style.

>> No.7124626

>>7124611
You've never seen anyone wearing overly colorful and plasticy running shoes?

These are just more colorful versions of what was all the rage in elementary school.

>> No.7124639

>>7124626
They literally just look like 80s/90s kids running shoes. Where the velcro at?

>> No.7124648
File: 238 KB, 1080x652, t3p3n_9759_0010198285_f_l_primary.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7124648

>>7124611
>>7124626
he's probably thinking of asics runnings shoes like these. people who 'don't care about fashion' often wear shoes like these with baggy stonewash jeans, a graphic tee, and/or a hoodie of the local sports team. or else khaki cargo shorts.

i see his point, but i ultimately disagree. the rafs are different enough, and if a person knows what they're doing, they can make the rafxadidas sneakers work. i feel the same way about the recent raft of sneakers in this style from other designers; lanvin and dries especially.

>> No.7124646

>>7124626

Nothing in these color combinations, in these proportions, with these details, no.

>> No.7124683
File: 302 KB, 1500x1500, asics-gel-1160-running-shoes-for-men-in-white-black-storm~p~4389v_01~1500.3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7124683

>>7124648
why did this picture happen. i specifically went to google images and saved a pic of asics men running sneakers. ive never even saved that pic of that actor before. is anyone else seeing that guy from cheech and chong or am i just crazy.

i didnt save this picture. am i really this drunk? what the fuck

>> No.7124693

>>7124683
its a 4chan bug
when 2 people post at the EXACT same time sometimes the pics flop
someone somewhere on another board just posted the pic you actually tried to

>> No.7124700

>>7124648
>>7124683
Speaking as him - yeah, basically it's these shoes with garish colors.

I get the idea, is it supposed to be super different than more minimalist running shoes and all attention grabbing? My problem is that I can't see these going with any outfit, and every fit I've seen w/ them looks awful.

>> No.7124710

>>7121206
If you were "that guy" that wore all black, what'd be the issue with these shoes?

Second from right looks cool. Imagine someone kicking you in the face while wearing those - that'd be embarassing

>> No.7124904

>>7121435
Nigga do you even truffle? fucking pleb.

>> No.7124929
File: 307 KB, 778x514, ss (2013-10-22 at 02.28.27).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7124929

tfw :)
order was confirmed today and shud be getting them in 2 weeks

>> No.7124933
File: 7 KB, 300x300, muh bush.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7124933

>>7121675
someone else made it for me B)

>> No.7125102

>>7124683
The confusion of unsuspecting posters when this happens is always top lel

>> No.7125108

>>7121206
>multicolored shoes
haha wow

>> No.7125449

is the quality of these that of regular adidas? also, do you think somewhere like mr porter will have them on sale whenever the next one is? the hanon sale didn't have any of the colourways in my size

>> No.7125482

>>7124929
Mine too, brother

>> No.7125494

>>7125449
The quality is different than regular adidas and it's kind of funny because by Adidas standards they are WORSE quality.

The Rafs are supposedly made from higher quality materials, therefore they will break apart if you run in them.

So they are higher quality, but if you treated them as you would treat Adidas, Adidas would come on top.

>> No.7125511

>ITT: babbys getting their first "designer" piece

>> No.7125537

>>7125511
>tfw it's gonna be my first designer piece
>tfw it's the only designer shoe i've ever really wanted besides some OOP Vandals

>> No.7125545

>>7125511
but it's not designer lol
still cool tho

>> No.7125571

>>7121349

They're supposed to be a loud piece you ignoramus, they're supposed to be a focal point that you build the rest of your fit around.

>> No.7125689
File: 178 KB, 460x307, RAF_2_460.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7125689

How to improve this?
>>7123588

>> No.7125694
File: 91 KB, 500x493, tumblr_mp0pac0tcu1qe9ydgo1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7125694

>>7125494
The 2014 look much better quality so far.

>> No.7125718

>>7125689
personally i would keep the fit black/white/grey apart from the shoes so it's not too cluttered
i also think they look better with cropped/high cuffed jeans so give the shoe room to breathe

>> No.7125762

>>7125694
wow they don't look pig disgusting
still near-unwearable
but at least a little more interesting

>> No.7125772
File: 308 KB, 900x660, raf-simons-adidas-originals-2014.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7125772

>>7125762
Probably gonna cop that colourway, and if I don't think i can wear them, ill put them on display somewhere.

>> No.7125797
File: 916 KB, 926x621, Picture 3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7125797

>GUYS I THINK THESE SHOES ARE REALLY FUCKING DISGUSTINGLY HIDEOUS FOR SO MANY REASONS
>WHY ARE THERE SO MANY DIFFERENT COLORS? MAROON, PINK, AND NEON YELLOW DO NOT MESH.
>WHY DO THEY LOOK LIKE RUNNING SHOES? THAT'S NOT FASHIONABLE! IT'S WHAT THE WEIRDOS IN MY ENGINEERING COURSES WEAR.
>CHECK OUT THESE ASICS (LINK); THEY'RE EXACTLY THE SAME.
>I BET YOU ALL JUST BUY THEM FOR THE NAME.
>I BET YOU ONLY HEARD OF RAF SIMONS BECAUSE OF THAT A$AP ROCKY SONG.
>I BET IF YOU SURVEYED RANDOM STRANGERS, A VAST MAJORITY WOULD DISLIKE THESE
>MARKED DOWN >50% ALREADY? WONDER WHY.
>YOU KNOW GRILLS WON'T THINK THESE ARE COOL RIGHT?
>THIS FIT PIC SUCKS AND THIS FIT PIC SUCKS AND THIS FIT PIC SUCKS AND THIS FIT PIC SUCKS

...

>WHATEVER, YOU WON'T PULL EM OFF ANYWAY

>> No.7125825
File: 196 KB, 327x418, Picture 1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7125825

>>7125797


pretty much sums it up

>> No.7125846

>>7125797
I don't understand what you are trying to say.

>> No.7125882

>>7125846

it's the typical response to these sneaks from normalfags.

>> No.7125891

>>7125797
buyer's remorse: the post

>> No.7125904
File: 750 KB, 2916x1658, 1277264477780.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7125904

>>7125891

are you implying that guy is srs tho?

>> No.7125935
File: 2 KB, 154x205, raf-simons-okini-jewellery-mens-helmet-head-brooch.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7125935

do u think i could buy a pair and then sell them for like $200 later on?

>> No.7125945

>>7125935

there's really no sizes left nigga

>> No.7126005

>>7125772
What colorways do those orange ones come in?

I've think I've seen the green one but is it just those two?

>> No.7126051
File: 216 KB, 1280x853, a-further-look-at-the-raf-simons-for-adidas-2014-spring-summer-collection-video-00.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7126051

>>7126005
Apparently each model comes in 3 colourways for a total of 21 different shoes. A lot of the colourways havent been shown yet.

>> No.7126069
File: 33 KB, 640x373, blogger-image-321303983.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7126069

>>7126051

>> No.7126077

>>7123588
ty hungry skeleton

>> No.7126086
File: 195 KB, 460x307, RAF_3_460.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7126086

>>7126077
np

>> No.7126099

>>7125494
>The Rafs are supposedly made from higher quality materials, therefore they will break apart if you run in them.

What the hell are you talking about? At least substantiate your ridiculous claims.

>> No.7126104

>>7125545
>Designed by Raf Simons
>not designer

>> No.7126116

>>7125797
I love you

The amount of ill will against these shoes is staggering.

>> No.7126124

>>7126051
I'm not crazy about these. It's like he's buying into the trend of minimal sneakers, which I saw the AW 2013 collection (among other of his shoe collections) as a reaction against.

>> No.7126125
File: 178 KB, 460x307, RAF_4_460.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7126125

>>7126099
Not really higher quality in terms of strength, but different and more expenisve materials that don't hold up with intensive use like running.

>> No.7126142

>>7126125
What materials are you talking about?

>> No.7126155
File: 244 KB, 960x754, 3225844_lookbook.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7126155

>>7126142
Leather paneling, silicone bubbles, holographic material under the silicon, weird nylon-ish paneling, rubber paneling, unconventional mesh style and colours, etc.

>> No.7126158

When these first came out, there were no posts or hype in /fa/ and now everyday a new thread dedicated to these rafs.
Viral Marketing at it's finest.

>> No.7126231

>>7126158

how is this an example of viral marketing?

main thing that changed is that they dropped to insanely low sale prices at a couple shops, and thus became attainable for a lot of folks here. that's what sparked all the conversation.

>> No.7126247

>>7126155

I think it's hard to say how they will hold up until someone tests them out, unless raf n co said not use them for running. a lot of true running shoes that exist on the market have similar material arrangements. I think they would be fine but not great. I would just get nike gyakusous if looking for something that looks cool/different and you can definitely run in.

>> No.7126268
File: 274 KB, 700x525, P1080220 raf_700_0_resize.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7126268

>> No.7126271

>>7126231
The reason why they dropped to sale prices was because they just weren't selling at all, anywhere. They may have been the ugliest colab , but when has cost ever been a factor in sneaker hype in /fa/?
>geobaskets

>> No.7126281
File: 191 KB, 1023x683, raf-simons-adidas-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7126281

>>7126247
A card comes with them that says:

"Due to the exclusive design and materials, these shoes are not guaranteed to perform like adidas athletic shoes. Unique materials are at times used on our products to create distinctive looks. These materials may require special care. Some recommendations include avoiding damp environment, prolonged exposure to sunlight and other conditions that may stress the materials."

Doesn't specifically say don't run in them, i think they just wrote that as a precaution.

>> No.7126398

>>7126271
They are selling well on loads of sites

>> No.7126403

>>7124929
What website

>> No.7126405

>>7126155

that fucking fit, top haha

you adiraf fags are cancerous

>> No.7126425

>>7125772
These are so much worse.

>> No.7126471

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXa3U7etdoI

lol this guy is wearing raf x adidas in this vid

>> No.7126479

>>7126471
what a douche

>> No.7126518

>>7126471

jesus christ

pb nike tier

>> No.7126537
File: 34 KB, 394x388, 1365331724181.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7126537

>mfw size 13us

>> No.7126632

Anybody know if any other sites are eventually gonna put them on sale? I''m considering shelling out for a pair but if they go on sale right after i will kill myself.

>> No.7126860

>>7126632
Maybe email them but they probably won't say :)

>> No.7126870

has anyone who ordered from hanon got dispatch yet?

i haven't heard anything

>> No.7126881

>>7126870
I ordered mine and got a message saying that my order was processed an hour ago

>> No.7126888

>>7126881

mine processed on the 22nd, lazy scottish are prob smoking weed or eating battered mars bars

>> No.7126909

>>7126888
whoa what always thought hanon was german lol

>> No.7126943

>>7126870
Ordered on the 18th, dispatched yesterday.

>> No.7126960

I seriously hope none of you mongs run in these. I've had them for a few months and they're not built to withstand it. It even says on the card that comes with them

I hope this isn't this the new trend. Fuckin /fa/ pushing shit. I've wanted these since last season when they were shown.
>inb4 special snowflake
i am.

>> No.7126988

>>7126960
Lol
Have you never wanted something for a while then bought it when it was on sale?
They've been pretty consistently discussed since their release

>> No.7127000

>>7126988
sure. but why make a thread for just a shoe god damn. make a raf thread
but i guess its the only raf piece you guys could wear anyway.
sort of like how certain rappers can only wear gucci belts :)

>> No.7127189

>>7127000
Why are you upset that someone else owns the same shoe as you

>> No.7128903

Bump

>> No.7128962
File: 636 KB, 1280x1579, raf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7128962

raf / thrift-diy / raf

>> No.7128965
File: 29 KB, 300x400, varg_vikernes-burzum[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7128965

>>7128962

>> No.7128985

>>7128962
cool, I like it

>> No.7128998

>>7128962
Sorry, that looks terrible imo, don't like the sillhouette or the way you tried to mix styles, doesn't work for me.

>> No.7129031

>>7128962

yohji / raf

>> No.7129039
File: 228 KB, 380x644, yohji:raf.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7129039

>>7129031
forgot image . .

>> No.7129063

>>7129039
>desaturating
you're even more pathetic than i had previously though

>> No.7129071

>>7129063
t

>> No.7129087

>>7129063

post fit.. then.. i guess
oh yeah my one shirt is worth more than your entire closet

>> No.7129089

Those are the kind of hideous ass shoes I would expect to see someone who wears athletic gear as their daily clothing to wear.

>> No.7129097

>>7128962
I really like this, one of my fave fits with them
If i was gonna nitpick i'd say it's a bit too matchy for me
would look dope with an oversized black sweat imo

>> No.7129103

>>7129089

literally no one cares about your opinion that has been stated countless times

>> No.7129113
File: 106 KB, 618x620, percent faggot.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7129113

>>7129087

>> No.7129139

>>7128962
That looks great, defiantly something I'd wear, probably one of my favorite fits with those shoes.
I've always loved the sweater/shorts combo

>> No.7129204
File: 33 KB, 368x348, 1382090537531.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7129204

No
You guys don't get it
This is a contest between Raf and Rick
The one who designs a shoe so ugly that no one buys it wins
It started with Geos
Raf threw in Holos
Then Rick came out with his Adidas collab
Now this

>> No.7129213

>>7129204
rickidas came after this

>> No.7129217

>>7129204
YOURE A FUCKHEAD
THOSE ARE THREE SHOES
IN THE PAST LIKE
10 YEARS
FASHION HAS BEEN AROUND FOR A LOT LONGER THAN THAT
AND THERE ARE MORE DESIGNERS AS WELL
GET OFF /fa/ AND LEARN SOMETHING
ALL OF YOU

>> No.7129224

>>7128998
wqhat mixed style lol.

>> No.7129231

>>7129213
Makes sense since Rickidas look worse than these, if only by a little bit.

>> No.7129234
File: 31 KB, 461x131, ripmusic.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7129234

>>7129204

>> No.7129239

>>7129224

he is referring to the style of wearing a sweater
with the style of wearing shorts
with the style of wearing rafidas

aka he's an idiot and has no clue what he's talking about

>> No.7129247

>>7129239
none of that is style? maybe together sure. everyone can create a style. maybe he thinks it looks bad but its not 'mixing styles' and yeah i agree

>> No.7129254

>>7128962

nice, is this yours?

>> No.7129330

>>7128962
i fucking love this

>> No.7129343

>>7129330
did you cop a pair in the end?

>> No.7129367
File: 303 KB, 771x1037, bananas_and_tomatoes_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7129367

>>7129343
i haven't yet

gonna do eet when i get some mo cash


>tfw i'll end up paying mr p price for em

>> No.7129637

>>7129367
sneakersnstuff has em for p cheap, not as cheap as the sales but still p cheap

>> No.7131117

>>7125689
bump. what kind of pants?

>> No.7132050

>>7131117
Black

>> No.7132074

>>7131117

i think the trick might be a less conventional silhouette. some slightly looser fitting trousers either cuffed or cropped would be cool

also i think you need to balance out the whole 'bulky' aesthetic with something more on top, whether that's a bigger, looser tee, a sweater, or a jacket over the top or something

its no mean feat to pull off these shits thats for sure

>> No.7132107

I could cop them. Right now. In my size. In the color-way I wanted. For the sale price.


Should I do it?

>> No.7132120

>>7132107

these kind of cops usually don't end well

how much do you really like them? ahve you figured out what u'd wear with em?

>> No.7132118

>>7132107
Yes, obviously.

>> No.7132164

>>7132107
Would you wear them? Do you only cop because it's on sale?

By the way, are those comfortable? Bought them as a Roshe substitute.

>> No.7132176

>>7132074
i agree with this
needs something bulky on top
also i would lose the watch cause it doesn't really fit in

>> No.7132285

>>7132107
Yes.
Even if you change your mind you'll probably be able to sell them for at least how much you paid. And if it's the colorway you want what reason is there not to cop?

>> No.7132693

>>7132107
w2c

>> No.7133240

Has anyone owned a pair of these that they bought tts? I've got a pair on the way and all I've read is that they'll be a bit snug, which I'm fine with, but I haven't actually seen anyone saying this who say that they own a pair.

>> No.7133352

>>7123701
why the fuck did she/he go with white socks

WHY

>> No.7133368

>>7121530
Are you slav?

>> No.7133515

>>7133240
please help

>> No.7133633
File: 30 KB, 600x309, what.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7133633

>>7123701

This is so ugly I don't even

>> No.7133881

>>7121440
u can't run in them fuck u

>> No.7133993

>>7121206

1 massive troll thread. Trolls getting trolled by trolls into buying these hideous Raf simon grandpa trainers.

Copped 2 pairs of Nike Roshe QS's though.

>> No.7134018

>>7126155
wtf is this shit

>> No.7134720

>>7129204
holos are sick idk what youre talking about

geos are just shit on more ofthen because of goofbois who cant pull them off in fits. they do look like clown shoes though and id never buy a pair, but calling them the ugliest shoes ever is pretty lame.

but yeah holos are sick m8

>> No.7134792

>>7133993
lol

>> No.7134809

>>7134720

holos are disgusting

i can bet all my money that your background in secondary school for your computer was a really expensive supercar you fucking tacky chav

>> No.7134834

>>7134809
nah holos look great.

>> No.7134871
File: 144 KB, 1024x683, AAD66401_RF6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7134871

we all agree this is the best colorway right

>> No.7134900

>>7134871
best ozweego
second best overall >>7124929

>> No.7134932

>>7126124
disregarding velcroes and his hi tops this season?

>> No.7134970

Am I seriously the only person who finds these things hideous?

>> No.7135024
File: 21 KB, 280x280, ashton500$.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7135024

cop or not?

>> No.7135095

>>7135024
n

>> No.7135623
File: 137 KB, 1000x1000, 01-07-2013_adiraf_osweego2_shale_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7135623

>>7134871
I don't know why people think that colorway is appealing, I like this one a lot better.
They are all nice in their own way i guess tho

>> No.7136314

>>7126155
>good camera
>amazing backdrop
>shit fit
this pic makes me sad

>> No.7136351
File: 40 KB, 800x430, c26-B005J2LLAM-1-l.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7136351

>those autist sneakers
Reminds me of pic related

>> No.7136359
File: 137 KB, 1213x818, bbb2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7136359

#nextlevel

>> No.7136368

>>7136351

Obviously shoes like this are the reference, but the difference in color and detailing make them pretty different shoes. That's the whole point. They're styled like these shoes, but they don't look like these shoes.

>> No.7136381

>>7136359

i'm impressed by that stitching lol

>> No.7136480

So is /fa/ buying into the fedoracore trend or what?


w2c fedora

>> No.7138534

they're fucking ugly so no
not to mention only autists wear running shoes when they're not running