/fa/ - Fashion

Bump

>>7106749
What brand?

This is what I'm wearing.

>>7106913
It's a marina militare, this particular model is $93.
I like that a lot, but I think it would make my wrists look tiny (which they are).

Want this so bad but
>6.5'' wrists
>Out of stock
;_;

>>7107143
Muh pictures

>>7107151
That's classy. How much?

>>7107163
$145, it's the cheapest Type A Flieger there is and it's pretty decent too.

OP here. So do you guys think I should pull the trigger on OP pic?

bump

you jelly, /fa/ggots?

Post watch fits

>>7107250
frat/10

>>7107256
>entire board dedicated to kids pretending they're fashion forward and pretending to own ridiculous expensive shit tier things
>implying you could afford that

>>7107250
this is a stock photo, why would i be jealous? lets see it on your wrist

>>7107293
>implying I said I have it
>implying the thread is about watches you own
>implying you're not all retards who pretend to spend thousands on hobo sneakers and other garbage
deal with your reality /fa/ggot

>>7107303
holy mother of shitposting, batman

>>7107175
Not the cheapest, my friend:
http://shop.alaskamint.com/Alaska-Brand-Stainless-Steel-Watch-with-Automatic-Movement-AS1959-LEATHER.htm

Type-A quarts fliegers can be found on ebay for <$20. Ebay watches are fun but a little too cheap sometimes.

opinions?

>>7107482
like like like

>>7106749
California dials are retarded. I don't care if some Rolex were modified that way.

>>7107473
>branded
Ugh.

>>7107594
why are california dials retarded? I live in california if it makes a difference.

>>7107712
>random mix of roman numerals, arabic numerals, and shapes
The six in particular throws it off, and it's only named after some random Rolex refurbishing company that existed in California.

>>7107473
>48 mm
holy mother of god

>>7107752
Yeah, I know; shit's out of hand these days.

>>7107770
>these days
Very vintage watches weren't exactly small you know.

>>7106749
100$ budget on a watch? wtf son

>>7107794
Not everyone is rich like you, anon, or wants to spend much on a device that does something as simply as tell time.

>>7107787
That's because they sat in your pocket and not on your wrist, doofus. Wristwatches weren't a thing until 1920/after WWI, when fumbling with a piece of metal in your pocket would get you killed.

>>7107835
Early wristwatches were literally pocket watches on straps.

Current watch

tfw
>$140 outfit
>$700 watch

this is the life I have chosen /fa/

>>7107482
sleek style and moderate price, would cop if was my style

>>7107787
the above 40mm wrist watches back in the day were all fliegers that sat on the outside of your thick as fuck leather pilots jacket
they weren't worn off duty

>>7107858
tits or gtfo?


>latest cop

>>7107857
some watchmakers still do that.

I.e. IWC's Portuguese line with the 5### movement

>>7108214
I always wonder when people wear 10K watches if they'll ever find an outfit that matches the prices.

>>7108226
yeah
you'd pretty much need to wear illegal pelts and exotic reptilian skinned boots and accessories in order to match the price of your Blancpain or Hubolt

am I the only one on /fa/ with a raging hard on for the 60's psychedelic Accutron Spaecview?

/fa/'s opinion i just ordered it on sale

>>7108312
Bad news for you, it wasn't on "sale". Stuhrling is one of those watch companies who use the bullshitt RRP trick. If you check Amazon for example every single of their watches there is in somekind of ridiculous 80% "sale". Shit like "normally 695$ but now only 85$!" In reality it's barely worth the 85$ for being rather flimsy, Chinese watch.

>>7108312
how much for?

wow, for a bunch of 'effay' people you all sure have a shit taste in watches.

>>7106749
Marina Militare? First, they are fakes of panerai. Second, never get a gold case diver watch (this is a diver design). Second, Green markers, gold case, black dial, brown strap. Holy mother jesus I've never seen something more ridiculous in my life. Of all the MM watches to choose you pick this one? Wow.

>>7106913
>sturhling, dimonties.
Enough said.
>>7107151
Ok but can get way better gliegers. Drop 150 more and you get a hamilton Khaki pilot that won't leave you disappointed in anyway

>>7107250
lolex
>>7107259
never liked sunburst/blue hand combo. Either or. Ok watch tho.

>>7107482
Skagen is good. First watch I've seen I'd buy. The stiching down the band though is a gimmick as it is not actually holding the band together there
>>7107858
Good if you're 40+. Otherwise gold/steel is a no no, and that is a dated as fuck watch. props for Omega tho.
>>7108222
NICE. If you want something that complicated, well done, will go well with a lot of things, dressy or cas.
>>7108312
LOL

>>7108312
I personally hate circular date windows, they look cheap on almost all dials

dream watch

affordable dream watch, in the sense that I would be able to buy one, someday.

>>7107858
steel and gold are fine. the Constellation is a good workhouse, but that's a quartz movement right?

>>7108329
very respectable choice, I share the same piece with the same sentiment towards it as you in fact.

Though I don't mean to disparage your choice, but the blue is too much in that portuguese.

>>7108337
I don't like brown leather straps, eithe black leather or mesh for me.

I don't know what you mean by saying the blue is too much then posting a blue dial yourself?

This is my favourite IWC, not too busy and still has in house movement

>>7108347
You don't like brown straps? What is actually a bit crazy my friend. How can you not like brown straps. Not only does it go with all the brown/red/warm/earth toned colours you wear, but is far more versatile than a black strap. It goes well with a white dial or a black dial. Mesh is the flimsiest, cheapest and least attractive way to hold a watch. That's not even to mention the fact that the colour range (difference in tones from the grain of the leather) is far superior and interesting on a brown strap.

I mean on your particular watch. Blue hands with white/stainless steel everything is not a good combo. There is nothing to counteract the blue, which there needs to be when introducing blued markers and hands. Otherwise they pop too much and look gimmicky.

The brown perfectly throws off the blue in the other picture. Not only that but blue/brown are a very typical and aesthetically pleasing colour combination, in watches, fashion and art of all kinds.

Just bought myself this one again. The one I had before was a gift from my ex, so I threw it out.
Mine has a date, though.

>>7108357
even though it is the definition of a gimmick watch, I've always liked the Mondaine

>>7108323
nigga knows his shit

post your watch/s brah

>>7108337
wtf is with that eastern subdial
>days 1-7
absolutely useless

>>7108360

Same here and that's why I bought it again. Pic related is my other dress watch, but it's kind of played out.

riddle me this
do Valjoux 7750 movements come in any watches sized 41 or under?
is that possible? Can the same movement exists just on a smaller scale?

>tfw manlet wrists
>tfw 41mm dress watch looks big-big

>>7108389
IWC @40.9mm lol

>>7108356
ahhh i see what you mean about the blue and brown. Black is just better.

>>7108370
that's the power reserve indicator.

>>7108399
for what IWC cost I expected in-house movements
but thanks for the knowledge, I always liked their chronos

>7 day power reserve
oh...
>mfw

>>7108399
IWC don't use ETA/Valjoux movements m8

>Portugese Chronograph
>40.9mm
>Caliber 79350

7-day power reserve is impressive, but not necessarily a good thing. The more the watch is working the quicker it will break down and need a service. I'd rather have to wind up my watch daily than have it working for a week while not being on my wrist causing unnecessary wear on the movements gears and lubrications

>post yer grail pieces

>>7108360
What's so gimmick about it? It's a classic high visibility design.

>>7108377
That is not a dress watch.

>>7108440

Why not?

>>7108426
>Caliber 79350
It's what IWC calls the 7750 movement, they buy the highest grade from ETA and modifies in house. Though I believe that has changed recently as ETA/Swatch is reducing their supply to outside companies. Sellita is now providing the 7750 inspired movement.

>7-day power reserve is impressive, but not necessarily a good thing

I think the previous statement showed that you have no idea wtf you're talking about. So we'll leave you 'opinion' about power reserves at that, opinion.

>>7108426

>>7108448
how do you modify a stock 40 hour reserve movement into a 250+ hour reserve?

>>7108456
You're a fucking moron. Where did it say IWC modifies the 7750 into a 7 day movement?

That post was two separate answers.

7 days = 168 hours

You are an absolute fucktard.

>>7108443
It's not formal at all.
>brightly colored hand
>rubber strap
>ugly date window

>>7108464

>>7108464
>rekt
250+ hours in a week
>lol

cop or not?

cheap / quartz / WR100m / shock resist(?) / date

for boys weekends, camping, drankin, general outdoors shit

>>7108503
and going to the gym, with a diff colour strap

>>7108467

It's 2013, m8.

>>7108323
thanks for the input.

Thinking of copping uniform wares 103 in black. Opinions? Could I do better when it comes to a good looking minimalist watch?

>>7108503
>$120
yeah prolly
if you like it get it

>>7108503
def get, i copped a solar G shock for diving, kayaking and trrekkiun

>>7107303

wow
kill yourself

>>7108323
>>7108364
>nigga knows his shit
>skagen is good, rolex sucks tc

Guess how many you can pick

>>7108503
Ok watch. Looks good on nato, wont look as good irl as that is prime lighting.

>>7109170
Don't pretend Rolex has done anything significant in the last 30 years. They were a good company, until they became a marketing ploy.

>>7109170
Oh and I never implied Skagen is better than Rolex, I said the Skagen is only one id buy so far, because its cheap and effective at looking reasonably nice. Would drop thousands on the rollie when theres much better watches for the money.

>>7109170
how many

>>7109170
idk about quality or anything but skagen does actually have good designs and are moderately priced.

>>7108337
dial is way too big. if I'm spending that much on a watch I can just get a shitty one with diamonds all over it and have the same flash. a dial that large is for niggers.

>>7107858
You know that's a women's watch right?

what do you guys think of tag heuer?

>>7109205
>tag heuer
good

Opinions on Russian diver watches?

>>7109206
Carrera line is half decent, the rest if woeful.

Even then, I'd recommend looking elsewhere first unless you really want a Tag.

They're simply not known for being great watch makers.

>>7106749

>>7109210
Shitty hipster shit. Ever flannel wearing faggot wears a Raketa or a Vostok. They try to get indy cred by wearing a Russian mechanical. Look somewhere else.

>>7109224
I'm well aware of their reputation. I have a Formula 1 and a Carrera. I didn't pay for either of them. I was just wondering what you guys thought. Now what I would really like to get my hands on is a Patek calatrava.

>>7109235
sell them both to fund the Patek

the 1887 is a glorified Seiko movement, not that it's bad but I get over the marketing bombs that Tag throws.

>>7107124
The Stuhrling is a nice watch, it was like 300$ but it comes with an entire cleaning and maintenance kit.. I have tiny wrists as well so I had to have a jeweler size it down alot.

>>7109180
It's common knowledge that Skagens are flimsy pieces of plastic crap.

I've heard the Seiko 5 automatics are hit and miss with the time lost/gained
Shame cause it's affordable

What does /fa/ think of Uniform Wares?

I really like their watches but they seem terribly overpriced for a quartz movement.

>>7109700
All automatics are that way.

Any opinions on Porsamo Bleu watches? Gilt has a sale on em and just wondering if they're worth the effort or not.

Whenever I see someone recommend Rolex I assume they saw one once in an 80s movie and learned that they were "good".

I just feel bad for people who think those are the apotheosis of the wrist watch.

>>7110186
they're not bad but you can get way cheaper watches that are aesthetically superior

>>7108503
w2c?

>>7110818
Wearing a diving watch in almost every context is kind of shitty, but if you've absolutely gotta, rolexes still have a very clean, iconic look which is not to be shat upon

That said, the point of rolex's existence in 2013 is "currency for bribes in Russia and China" so no-one will ever be impressed by your taste if you rock one

Also I doubt that anyone in this thread actually has the ability to pull off an expensive diving watch in any context so it's kind of a moot point

>>7110873
I've always loved the look of the Explorer but feel like I'd look like a douche wearing one. Also I can't afford one.

Isn't it more a climbing watch than a diving watch? Like wasn't it wore by the guy who first climbed Everest or something?

>>7110885
Apparently the Everest claim is half-true. While that guy did wear the Explorer during the climb, he swapped the Explorer for another watch before reaching the peak.

Anyways, if I would ever buy a Rolex, it would be an Explorer. It has a clean look, understated look. It's also 39mm, so it looks good on skinny wrists.

The only reason why you'd feel like a douche is because of the Rolex logo.

>>7110843
http://www.amazon.com/Seiko-SSB007-Stainless-Steel-Bracelet/dp/B005DM0UBY/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1382395407&sr=8-1&keywords=Seiko+SSB007

Comes on a silver band (or black leather) - need to spend another 15-20 for the band in pic

>>7110885
yes
the explorer and submariner debuted the same year and were aimed at different markets

>teenagers thinking they know better about watches
>talking shit about rolex because it's "popular"
you could never own one not to mention you people are just like others you bitch about, it's like watching cheerleaders and goth bitches talk about each other.

>>7107482
Want 2 cop.
Which model is that?

OP here. Thanks for all the input, especially >>7108323
So - back to my original question:
WHAT THE FUCK WATCH SHOULD I BUY FOR ~100 DOLLARS IF I WANT TO LOOK EFFAY. I am begginer level /fa/ as in i followed some info graphics and i wear button ups/sweaters/jeans or chinos/desert boots.

>>7111705
where to get band?

>>7109220
thats a much better execution of op's pic idea.

>>7107482
>>7107482

w2c please

>>7112602
In polite company, we would call you a "fuccboi"
But seriously, if you want something sub $100 you're gonna have to look around. Go for something basic like a Timex or a Seiko with a nice slim design.

>>7112620
Other guy that wanted to cop here. I found it over in the sale section.

http://www.skagen.com/en_US/shop/sale/sale_mens/brown_leather_steel_watch-433lsl1p.html?parent_category_rn=361083&departmentCategoryId=361083&solrMetaData=cHJpY2VfVVNEOlswIDE3NV0%3D&N=0&maxRecPerPg=80&Nf=p_min_price%7CBTWN+0+175&pn=c&rec=25&imagePath=433LSL1

>>7112627
ah, thank you so much. def copping this

>>7112627
>SaIe section
>Not on saIe

lf it was $79, would have copped.

That reminds me.
I have this KC watch in disgusting orange that I got for a birthday a couple of years back when I was less effay. Is there any way I could get a different band for this in like a leather or am I better off just selling it to a fuccboi.

>>7108503
Woah nice.
Defs cop.

>>7112998
How you gonna sell it to yourself?

>>7113008

>>7112998
>>7113008
hash tag rekt

>>7112633
>>7112620

http://www.amazon.com/Skagen-433LSL1-Brown-Leather-Watch/dp/B00024CDD6/ref=sr_1_7?s=watches&ie=UTF8&qid=1382415387&sr=1-7

its 69 bucks on amazon doe

>>7106749
>TIME for a watch thread
Oh hahahahahaa! It is *time* for a watch thread! Watches tell *time*, and we have a thread dedicated to these *time* telling devices. It is indeed *time* for a watch thread. I finally get it now, OP, you are a genius! Hahahaha!

>>7113336
Yeah I bought mine for 60 from Amazon right now.
Always check amazon, /fa/gs

>>7113383
Ironic shirt posting is still shirt posting.

>>7113478
I am not posting shirts, I just tittered at OP's rib-tickler.

>>7113464
Used? Cheapest new one is $73 shipped.

>>7108389
It's possible. Off the top of my head:
Uhren Von Uhr
Junghans
Hamilton Khaki Chrono?

Everybody keeps talking about them so I might as well get them

>>7108503
Would cop @ $100 or less.

The SSB series is nice as they contain the relatively new VK series of mecha-quartz movements. Unfortunately, Seiko is only using the one with the semi-redundant 24hr dial in "Seiko"-branded watches and, since Seiko's really only "testing the water" with this line in the Western market, the SSB series is sorta generic looking.

>>7109210
Well-loved amongst watch enthusiasts. Personally, sort of unique and ugly in a nice way.

>>7109700
As long as it's within 10-seconds a day, it's pretty good for a Seiko 5. Mine is always on the dot. Regulation for improved accuracy can be done at home for free if you can find the software online.

>>7113530
It seems to fluctuate. But hey $73 is still a good price.

>>7112602
for something with the slightest feel of authenticity given that it doesn't run on battery but rather gears, springs and other mechanical elements; refer to this chart

>DISCLAIMER
these are entry level as fuck
they do not keep time as accurate as a quartz (battery) watch, they may be out by 10 seconds a day, a minute or two if you are unlucky. Not really a problem for most people

>>7112610
Amazon/eBay - search for NATO or Zulu strap
or
cheapestnatostraps.com

>>7112627
case 34mm
band 20mm

disproportionate as fuck
would not cop

how /fa/ is my watch?
just wanted something on my wrist without it being too flashy

>>7114176
forgot picture, lol

>>7114176
>>7114179
dadcore, just like your reasoning

>>7114293
dam you are fuckin accurate
i actually did get that from my dad LOL

>>7114298
stainless steel dive bezels are hard to pull off, its a little identity confused

but I like it on this tudor

>>7108537
You can't be serious.

>>7113464
Only half off of what they go for everywhere else. Definitely not a knock-off.

my poorfag selection.

1 seiko 5 automatic with a custom strap, 2 generic quartz dress watches.

>>7114480
wow the box they're in looks more expensive than the watches

>>7114494
Hah, it's a watch mover, it cost as much as the seiko 5. It's quite handy, allows me to wear my dress watches more often without the automatic one stopping.

>>7106749
yeh, and this is what I got for my teenage sis btw. Seems to be the real deal, does the Casi0 display when pressing that button.

>>7114480
thems are nice watches bruv

What do if have really skinny wrists? I see all these nice watches but I know that they'll look shit if they have loads of give in them.

>>7114501

>Buying a watch winder for a Seiko 5
>Calling it a 'watch mover'
>Keeping quartz watches in the box

Typical /fa/ggot.

>>7115092
how tight they are on your wrist is easily fixed, just have links in the steel bracelet taken out or put another band on

the main issue with having smaler wrists is some watch faces look really big on them

now this can go either way, as bigger watches have become more and more popular and so it really depends on the style and taste of the person. a watch enthusiast would probably tell you if the watch lugs (4 prongs coming off the watch case and connecting to the watch strap) hang over each side of your wrist - watch is too big.
if small wrists its safest to choose watches that are 39mm and below

but it's like everything, just get what makes you happy and suits you

pic related, my bitch-ass 6.5 inch wrists with a 41mm watch - I wouldn't ever go any bigger, and this is slightly on the too big side anyway

>>7116840
better angle

I know nothing about watches. How is this?

>>7116937
It's better than most Tissots out there, designwise. Personally, I'm not too crazy about it. I would keep looking. If you do end up buying that, don't sweat it. It's a good looking watch.

>>7113994
>Regulation for improved accuracy can be done at home for free if you can find the software online.
Could you elaborate?
btw you're a solid poster unlike 98% of this place

>$1400 watch
>poor as shit

Most fashionable janitor alive. yaaaaay

Bump

Opinions on a ~$1000 watch that can be dressed up/ down, preferably in rosegold/ brass with minimal/ interesting complications (no skeleton bullshit)?

>pic related, definately a top contender (but dem devilles, man)

>>7119806
I know it's Mad Men cosplay tier, but there's something awesome about how simple it is.

>>7116937
pretty cool actually. has a power reserve twice the length of normal automatics but for under 1k which is for the most part unheard of

good review here:
http://wornandwound.com/2013/04/17/tissot-luxury-automatic-powermatic-80-review/

that budget gives you free rein over a lot of styles and features though so I wouldn't settle for just the first thing you come across and happen to like
shoop aroun' nigga

>>7116937
certainly has a nice ass

>>7119806
I think some watches in that price range are featured in this webpage http://www.theversatilegent.com/great-mens-watches-under-1000/

I like the one with stick markers on it, but as always if you have more money buy a pre-owned watch above the $1k price.