/fa/ - Fashion

>>7089484
No.

>>7089484
no

Maybe in a sexual manner, but there's a very limited number of things you could pull off being that muscular.

So if you're looking to get laid extremely easilt or be on the beach in tiny trunks most of the time then go forth

Yes.

>>7089484
maybe

No. Unnatural and retarded

do i look good in clothes?

>>7089513
No.

nah, in clothes he'd look husky which isn't very /fa/ at all.

>>7089513
With an ugly face like that does it even matter?

>>7089523
>>7089557
new af

>>7089513
where's his cute dress

I never saw the point in getting your thighs to be as broad as your shoulders.

Obviously fucking yes, anyone saying otherwise is strait up retarded.

>>7089484
Ignore the seas of jelly.

Assuming clothes stay timeless absolutely. Dress for the Yale Club rather than the runway. Tweeds, tartans, duffels, roomy collared shirts, and all things masculine and traditional. Shorts and bright shirts will stun in summer, while collars under sweaters will proclaim your virility in fall.

Muscular men have been looking good in clothing for centuries, indeed millennia. Start scoping prep, ditch this board, and read Cato.

>>7090269

hahhahhaha nice

>can't wear anything but dad-fit ridiculously oversized denim
what was he thinking

>>7090201
you forgot your trip trunks

Yes, if you're Pavel Petel

maybe if you were a gladiator

but a slim archer is gonna kill the shit out of u anyway

>>7090269
wearing what your dad wore: contributing nothing to the human race or even to the development of your own identity

you should leave with him too you dadcore motherfucker

dressing for your body type doesn't mean going full prep just so you can fuck some dumb sorority bitches with trucker hats and cargos

ultimately though, to answer op, the answer is no if you mean in the context of fashion because the only function a body type like that might be useful for displaying is underwear just like the op, which as you can see, is not much clothing at all. whether it looks good naked is up to your many preferences.

>>7089484
It would be extremely hard to find fitting clothes, as his proportions are weird as fuck. Especially his enormous legs and shoulders are a problem.

>>7089484
where's his neck?

sure
a lot would have to be tailored though
i don't see the /fa/ beef with big guys really

>>7090870
Gladiators never looked like that

maybe, but I'm sure that ane of you are decades away from reaching a similar physique so go fucking lift already

>>7090870
archers were bigger

you guys are delusional.
that's not that big.
he'd look amazing in properly tailored clothes.
though there probably are a few styles being that swole prevent.

>>7090952
post a fit of someone looking good with thighs that big then

>>7090964
any fit with yohji pants,tapered jeans or sweatpants would fit just fine

>>7090971
post one

it'd look good in my vagina tho

>>7090964

lol wut. any anti fit stuff would look fine.

d u even runway

>>7090987
well here's an evergreen

>>7090870
>slim archer
Archers had stronger upper bodies than any other type of soldier m8, the fantasy were women can shoot a longbow is impossible in real life.

Also gladiators were bearmode fat

>>7090269

well done using a picture of sean connery in his aged atrophied state as an example of a muscular man. my 71 year old dad is more muscular than connery in that picture and the only exercise he does is mountain climbing/hiking, which is hardly noted for its ability to produce mad gainz.

>>7091001
>>7090920

lol yeh look at these chubby cunts.

>>7091001
slim archer is just a pasty boi fantasy they want to believe in to make up for the lack of physical fitness while they probably couldn't even pull the god damn bow string to its base without jumbling up their shoulders and form

>>7091030
english longbowmen must have been so fucking swole man

>>7091030
>>7091036
yeah dude i remember having issues getting a 50lb compound back

that was a while ago but still, i cant imagine a 150lb monster with no pulleys

>>7091017
This is likely inaccurate.

>>7090866
>Being fabulously gay in moscow

Literally balls of steel. Dat pavel.

>>7089484
>would this body look good in clothes?

Wow, so much Jelly in this tread.

Of course a fit individual looks good in clothes, the only problem is finding clothes that fit.

Take me for example, anything larger than a medium looks like a dress on me, but medium is way too short. A large will sorta fit my shoulders, but really only an extra large works or the seams for the selves are in the wrong place.

I've given up and started buying XL and having a tailor bring in the sides below my lats.

>>7090880
hahahahahahHAHAHAHAHHA oh this post man
This post man

So angry about his package. Nice delivery, though.

>>7090887
It's not difficult at all, actually. He just doesn't wear fucking skinny jeans like some hipster-trash homo

>>7090964
ANY SOCCER STAR EVER
Who get on fashion magazines all the time
Ever seen Beckham? Think he's some sort of skinny bitch?

>>7090964
>>7090987
>>7091052
You are so mad about something, but what? An athletically fit man with strong legs can look good (and does look good) in practically anything. He can wear "regular" sized jeans and they'll look like skinny jeans on him...except he's got the strength to look great. Any of that crumpled, hobo-tier shit that's popular on this board is shown to be humongous and would fit any but the morbidly obese. Plus, this dude is practically MADE for high-class, equestrian rider, vintage looks.

>>7091990
yes, let the buttmad flow through you

>>7092015
I think the point is that it achieves more potential the fewer clothes it wears. Why bother fucking around with "fashion?" Just wear whatever shit is comfortable and it will look great.

Unless for some random reason you are both ripped and really interested in fashion, but that's somewhat rare.

>>7092033
What would he be buttmad about? If he wants to wear skinny jeans, and has mass, he just picks a 501 rather than 510s, for example. With mass, there are skinny options all over the place. Assuming that's the look to be desired. Or, he can wear whatever because dude's fuckin' jacked.

>>7090269
I would say, don't go full out prep /#menswear unless you want to. In fact, the only part of this post that I agree with is that muscular dudes should stay away from runway fashion.

you're also right that they should leave this board. /fa/ is more for skinny runway types.

Workwear/americana would be what I would shoot for. Do what you want, just know that some type of clothes are meant for skinny body types.

>>7090880
>contributing nothing to the human race or the development of your own identity

I disagree. First of all, he could reinvent an old style, apply it to himself, change it slightly, etc. Secondly, just because it isn't avant garde doesn't mean he isn't developing his own identity. Forcing him to accept runway fashion and being skinny would be stifling the development of his own identity.

>you should leave with him too you dadcore motherfucker

yeah, I actually agree, /fa/ isn't for his kind. as long as he knows that though, it's fine.

pic is only slightly related to my argument. The guy isn't a twig, and that's probably what allows him to pull of the preppier style. That and lighting.

>>7092039
I was referring to the "hipster-trash homo" comment. Makes him sound dim-witted and angry.

>>7089484

Mirin.

>>7092076
Well, this board is pretty conceptual; most people who glance through it thinks it looks like a Zoolander impersonation forum.

>>7092056
i don't think built guys are ugly or anything, but this dude isn't pulling off shit

I've started lifting awhile ago and I'm curious about how far to go with it. This guy does look great without any clothes but I haven't decided whether I think you can pull off great looks when being ahtletically built. Anyone care to post fits with muscular dudes?

>>7089484
I'd rather be skinnyfat

>>7092056
stop posting photos filtered that heavily. I can understand a few filters but that is hyperreal.

>>7092056

>isn't a twig

Yeah, but he's not muscular. He's just wearing slim chinos and layering tops.

>>7092159
I can't understand you. No one wants to be skinny fat.

>>7092195
Well, If I'm skinny fat I can go running a few times a week and be relatively skinny and /fa/ in just a few weeks. I couldn't dress like I want to with the body in op.

>>7092207

you could just dress like Rick

or just wear y-3s, cargos, and loose flight jackets if you're lunarcore

>tfw working on getting bigger so I can finally pull off my Doriani, Firioni, Fedeli et al knitwear without drowning in them

>>7089484

lose those fucking thighs and maybe

unless oyu can cop Julius cargos, idk

>>7092056
This is the first time I've seen any actual advice here.

>>7092195
fat people do you autist

>>7090269
Seriously, dress like gosling if you're muscular and although you aren't /fa/ you look much better than anything /fa/. Being /fa/ isn't really a good thing. It just looks immature and like you're a broken person with mental problems to dress like that. Basicbitch+menswear+healthy body = hellafine well adjusted stud.

Of course OP. But those clothes must be slim fit as fuck OP. And no skinny jeans. Sweaters work well on such body.

>>7092310
>lose those fucking thighs

...and look like freakin Johnny Bravo. Proportions are everything.

>>7092504
They aren't even disproportionately big.

if you look like ocb you can dress in basicbitch and look 100x better than anything #nxtlvl. And you will look good in menswear. And you will look good in /out/core. Anything masculine will be pulled off flawlessly. However anything effeminate cannot be. This board is half effeminate twink wannabes.

by the way looking like that just looks like you have problems

The dude is 6'3" and 195lbs.

>>7089484
of course not, only look good naked in my bed before we have wild sex A-L-L N-I-G-H-T L-O-N-G

>>7089484
you could pull off dadcore like Ryan Gosling, I don't have any pics though. But trust me, he looks good in dadcore.

>>7089513
yes, YOU LOOK GOOD IN EVERYTHING. Mainly kissing me right on the mouth.