/fa/ - Fashion

ill start

>>7009219
that watch is $4,100.

>>7009276
and its fucking hermes, not worth shit.

How about something like this, to go with a lunar fit?

My tag heuer. Nice watch. Not worth the price.

>>7009333
I actually own a lot of Hermes, and honestly even insinuating that Hermes is anything but quality means you cant afford it, and have probably never seen a Hermes product in real life.

>>7009452
Damn, that thing's seen use. Props for having a monaco and not being a pleb

Current watch

>>7009509
Thanks. Ive had the watch for about a year and a half. I love it. The scratches all have stories. Like the time I dropped it.

am I /fa/ yet?

>>7009937
no you're /v/

>>7009937
neckbeard/10 tier watch

>>7009944
>>7010018

That hurt. But yeah, it's not like it was unexpected.

Currently performing poor man's regulation on these vintage Timex's; a proper timegrapher is $100+ investment that I'm not willing to make for a small hobby. Right-most is running fastest. These and others are for sale. Email in email field if you're interested.

$27.00 well spent?

>>7009499
It's because of the fact that they aren't a watchmaking company. It's not saying anything about the quality of the company's products as a whole

>>7010695
good cop

opinions on this?

$35 US

>>7010837
can you scale down your fucking pictures matey?

>>7010868
bro if he makes the picture any smaller, i'll have to invest in a wall mounted clock

Is this watch /fa/?

>>7010837
>3264x2448
thank you for the Hubble Space Telescope picture of that Timex.

>>7010767
just like the brand: JUNKER

My collection here. Hoping to get a Orient Union in the near future.

>>7009452
Damn man, you've put that thing through the works. Kind of a shame to have such a nice watch all marked up like that.
>>7010654
I like your Mickey watch. I like watches with a bit of personality to them and that's a pretty nice one.

i read the time on my Phone

I wanna get a Sinn 556A someday. Bit overpriced for what you get though.

>>7009219
Simplify watches are a little hipstery, but still nice bang for your buck.

Current watches. Enjoying the Braun.

>>7011706
Why did you buy 2 of the same watch?

>>7011712
The Uniform Wares is very satisfying to have on my wrist. The other is a cheapo that I got beforehand.

>>7010868
>>7010932
>>7011007
I just took a picture on my phone and up'ed it

>>7011706
w2c gray one?

>>7011747
Uniform Wares 101. It's actually brown, but they have one in pewter.

I have a casio terrorist watch
Dream watch is pic related

I have this watch, but the strap system thingie is really loose. Where to cop nice black leather strap?

do you guys like this one?

shell cordovan strap

>>7013041
Don't know why watches like that remind me of boy scouts.
I wouldn't wear it myself

>>7010695
Where did you get that? it's wonderful

>>7013041
>tumblr

lol
whats your tumblr

>>7013086
http://404-invalidurl.tumblr.com/

tissot prc100

>>7013000
>dream watch
>shitty $1k chrono
>leshoogydooddle

>>7011172
Whats that weird gauge on the bottom left of the face? AB - AUF?

>>7009219
Yes.

>>7009232
No.

>>7009247
No.

>>7009258
No.

>>7009435
No.

>>7009452
No.

>>7009632
Yes.

>>7009937
No.

>>7010695
Yes.

>>7010742
No.

>>7010767
No.

>>7010837
Yes.

>>7010965
No.

>>7011162
No.

>>7011172
Yes.

>>7011635
No.

>>7011663
Yes.

>>7011691
No.

>>7013000
Yes.

>>7013029
Yes.

>>7013114
No.

>>7013190
No.

ITT: Everyone posts their own personal choice on watches which any barely fit into being fa. And the majority of expensive watches posted look really tacky. Rolex produce a lot of vending machine style $5 cheap fake gold looking gold watches. IWC produce class. Learn higher price does not equate to fa.

My dream watch would be a Patel 5970. Yep.

>>7013293
Oops. That's my portugese. This is the 5970. Sorry on phone

>>7013287
a royal oak has more class than all IWC pieces added togheter.
their only good looking watch is the portuguese and it's overpriced as fuck.
and gtfo with the recommendations for shit like tissot or hermes, which is not even a watch brand

>>7013309
>>royal oak
>>class
>>my sides

>>7013287
>audemars piguet royal oak not fa
>recommends tissot and horological irrelevant brands like hermes while shitting on rolex

you're a fucking retard that probably doesn't own a single swiss made piece

and iwcs are overpriced as fuck, much more than rolex; the latter you can at least flip quite easily, iwc has one iconic watch (which is the portuguese) and that's it.

>>7013316
IWCs are priced just dandy.

The iconic ranges would be the Big pilots and Portuguese and the ingenieur.

But you guys are entitled to your opinions, just not your own facts.

>>7013316
>>iwc has one iconic watch (which is the portuguese)

also you do realise the Portuguese is an entire LINE of watches right? and not a singular time piece?

>>7013309
but seriously, you've gotta be kidding yourself when you're crapping on about Royal oak bring more classy than IWC when the Royal Oak is derived from the IWC ingenieur... yes, Gerald Genta designed for IWC before moving on to take that shape into the Royal Oak.

>>7013214
It's the reserve gauge. It tells how much longer until the watch stops telling time accurately. It's for mechanical watches. If you move around enough and wear it everyday it stays full.

>>7013293
Yes.

>>7013297
No.

>>7013309
>and gtfo with the recommendations for shit like tissot or hermes, which is not even a watch brand

This isn't a watch brand thread. If you think brand or price makes something fa then you need to start at the beginning again.

You could spent $100,000 on an outfit and still look a pleb.

>>7013316
Stop brand dropping, it's the style of the watch. A good brand and high price does not make something fa.

Jesus, teenagers ITT.

>>7013380
This.

>>7013287
>IWC
>class

kek, try a Patek, Vacheron, or JLC. IWC is a second tier watch brand.

Nixon Kensington Rose Gold. Absolute dream watch.

>>7010654
w2c mickey watch

>>7014355
>Nixon
>dream watch

Best be trollin'.

>>7015023
utter shit

Thoughts on this watch? Considering buying it

>>7015025
what's wrong with it?

>>7015029
2much shit going on

>>7015029
ugly ass colours

Are skeleton watches /fa/?

>>7009499
>hermes watch
top lel

>>7011025
>I like your Mickey watch.
y-you too

>>7014970
It's a vintage Bradley handwind. Time machine or ebay are your best bets. The rectangular case is rather uncommon for these watches. Run a search for them and you'll learn how Disney has leased the rights to Mickey Mouse to various watch brands since...the 30s?

I actually bought that one to flip but I'm not exactly sure that you'd want it in its current condition. The gold plating is gone around the edges of the watch and the crown shows brass. There's a small crack @ 7:30 but it cannot be felt with a fingernail. It's running about a couple minutes fast per day.

>>7014091
If IWC ranks second after those watches you mentioned then that's really really good lol, it means they're miles ahead of everyone else.

>>7013546
The Patek is wicked.

>>7015029
They hate it cause its versace. There are no rules for watches, just get whatever you like best

>>7015096

>USA at the top

Do I even have to elaborate? Get wrecked the rest of you

>>7015096

>>7015327

>TFW each day begins and ends with murrica

>>7015023
Are you just buying this because it's by Versace? Because it looks like shit

>>7015333
>that post
>those digits

I got a Mistura watch, it's made out a wood with an ebony as the face with an onyx stone. It's a great casual watch, and a decent price, they range from $100 to $200 depending on the style and materials. If you live in Dallas TX they have a store in the Galleria Mall.

>>7015421
i didnt think it was possible but that is the ugliest thing i have ever seen in my life. worse than tokyoflash

>>7009219
>buying fashion watches

>>7015431
If you like it whats the problem? Its 2012 a $2 generic watch tells time better than any $50,000 mechanical. Every watch is a fashion watch.

Whats this watch?

>>7015455
That's an iPhone clock.

>>7015465
huehuehue

Let's see what I can do for you.
1/8

2/8

3/8

4/8

5/8

6/8

7/8

8/8

I wear this one almost daily, like it it a lot.

>>7015041
No, they are neckbeard tier IMO.

I like it. Was on sale too.

Witch one /fa/ ?

>>7019715
The one on the left.

>>7019715
right

>>7019753
>>7019754
...my life summed up...

>>7019715
Neither.

>>7019715
both

>>7019823
>>7019715

This.

>shitty $2 nato strap
>shitty $2 movement
>shitty plain watch

Any suggestions for watches under $500? still a student and can't afford anything more expensive

>>7019823
A similar look can be accomplished for less than $20:
>Buy It Now
http://www.ebay.com/itm/New-Fashion-Mens-Black-Coffee-White-Ultra-thin-Case-Watches-Quartz-Wristwatch-/251172629176?pt=Wristwatches&var=&hash=item3a7b0e2ab8

>Auctions:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Sinobi-New-Fashion-Mens-White-Ultra-thin-Case-Watches-Quartz-Wrist-Watch-/221292337500?pt=Wristwatches&hash=item33860d195c

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Sinobi-New-Fashion-Mens-Black-Ultra-thin-Case-Watches-Quartz-Wrist-Watch-/221292723139?pt=Wristwatches&hash=item338612fbc3

Nato straps can be had elsewhere on ebay or watchuseek has recommended dealers.

>>7011025
post pic wearing the nato strap

>>7011025
>>7019990
i bought a slim, silver timex with a leather strap. i needed a watch and it was kind of a reluctant purchase. but ive grown to love it, now thats my favorite style of watch. im thinking of getting a nato strap.

>>7020013
Whats the point of buying a cheap watch in 2013? Cant you just check your phone?

>>7014355
>>>/hypebeast/
>>>/KTT/
taste this poor is not allowed

>>7018914
Damn. That's nice

>>7020042
its easier to check the watch, and you can use your watch as a compass and mine has a tachymeter.
also wouldnt you consider that a rather silly question on a fashion board?
i like the look of it.

>>7020128
i should also mention that i have to nice watches that my grandfather left to me, but i dont want to wear them around on a normal day since hes dead, so my timex is just because ive grown accustomed to having a watch and if a cheap one gets broken/stolen its not a huge inconvenience.

>>7010767
good pilot watches, wouldn't cop a second hand one though, also their white dial models look better than black imo

>>7015863
>>7015869
>>7015877
>>7015885
>>7015894
>>7015900
>>7015907
>>7015918
nice collection friendo, which do you wear the most?
whatd the pilot? got any more pics of the jungans chronoscpe? How is the junkers given the price?

>>7019823
fantastic

my grail watch

The Seiko is my next cop. I just bought a fjallraven rucksack so I have to wait two weeks. The Hamilton is what I'm going to wear after I graduate uni.

>>7015900


W2C, I have never seen a watch more beautiful than this.

>>7022111
thats the old kahki field auto, get the new one and get it on stainless, I've been considering it as well...

>>7022193
It's a Nomos but not sure which, they make the most beautiful simplistic pieces
>see inset

>>7022211

Thanks!

>>7022199
I like leather. I'm basicbitcch with a hint of outdoorsman and at times menswear/prep. Also I'm blonde so earth tones are my homie, no black shoes.

>>7022220
say no more

>>7022111
>After I graduate from university, I'm going to buy a watch that looks very similar to the one that I will already be wearing that costs several times more so that...
I never understand why people own multiple watches of the same style. I saw a thread on wus the other day in which OP collected nothing but sub homages. He had ~20.

>>7022310
~20 sub homages
that is the lamest thing I've ever heard

>>7022360
For the record, he did eventually acquire the genuine thing, but once he had it, IIRC, he no longer cared for it because it was the joy that he derived from the journey of collecting that gave the whole experience value. He flipped it.

>>7022360
Clunky.......


and 38 year old tapout bro+dad style

>>7022229
That's perfect as a more formal variety.

Would wear with navy suit.

>>7022360
Found it:
http://forums.watchuseek.com/f71/greatest-best-watch-world-tribute-any-guesses-631127.html

>>7022392
I somewhat understand that, for me searching everywhere for the watch that closest fits my exact specifications is enjoyable.
making lists and comparisons and hunting down real photos or videos and reading reviews etc you learn a lot that way as well

eg - was in the market for a black dial chrono earlier and was thinking quartz

>>7022415
now that
is an obsession

>>7013000

Hey man, that's a dream you can achieve. What do they cost, like a thousand bucks or so? Get it, man.

My dream watch is pic related, i don't care if it's too much, I've wanted one for as long as I can remember.

>>7022449
Care for a bagel, sport?

>>7022462
>>7022449
>>7022392
>>7022360
>>7022310


I know a guy who buys nothing but fakes. He said he used to have a Panerai, but sold it as soon as he found out how good the fakes were. He said they where indistinguishable so he sold his legit one and bought a bunch of fakes with the money.

>>7022507
>>He said they where indistinguishable

dudes kidding himself.

>>7022521
I saw it for myself, he wasnt lying. It looks and feels exactly the fucking same. These "luxury" watch companies are a scam

Current watch, automatic version.

>>7022539

sure pal.

>>7022552
of all the Nomos...
specs?

>>7022570
sounds like someone bought a pan

>>7022614
>autism

>>7022614
really? dude you're a moron, buy all the shitty fakes you want

>>7022623
I dont own a fake. I dont own any watches at all

>>7022618
>>7022623

samefag

looking for basic dress watches in black and brown. nothing too expensive, not stupid looking. i dont want to go over ~$100 really.

w2c

>>7022742
this looks alright and not too pricey
http://www.amazon.com/Skagen-858XLSLC-Denmark-Super-Chrome/dp/B003ZUMB5E/ref=sr_1_3?s=watches&ie=UTF8&qid=1381051616&sr=1-3&keywords=skagen
any opinions?

>>7022657
>implying only one person would think you're a moron

>>7022655
>claims to not own a watch
>says fakes are just like the real thing
2/10

>>7022755
I think anon was right, panerai replicas are pretty much the same

>>7022742
black and brown what, dial? strap? case?

>1
http://www.amazon.com/Bulova-96B104-Strap-Silver-Watch/dp/B002IDTUHG/ref=sr_1_sc_1?s=watches&ie=UTF8&qid=1381052197&sr=1-1-spell&keywords=buova+dress+watches+men
>2
http://www.amazon.com/Bulova-97B100-Strap-White-Watch/dp/B002LUEI9Q/ref=sr_1_93?s=watches&ie=UTF8&qid=1381052152&sr=1-93&keywords=dress+watches+men
>3
http://www.amazon.com/Swatch-YGS749G/dp/B006DZB9AQ/ref=sr_1_16?s=watches&ie=UTF8&qid=1381052089&sr=1-16&keywords=dress+watches+men

>>7022768
>claims not to own a watch
>says friend's fake seemed the same as his legit

>being this serious

>>7022781
strap.

>>7022781
thanks they look nice.

how do they compare with these, respectively?

http://www.amazon.com/Citizen-BM8240-03E-Eco-Drive-Stainless-Leather/dp/B000EQS1D8/ref=sr_1_12?s=watches&ie=UTF8&qid=1381052420&sr=1-12

http://www.amazon.com/Citizen-BM8242-08E-Eco-Drive-Gold-Tone-Stainless/dp/B000EQU0NW/ref=sr_1_10?s=watches&ie=UTF8&qid=1381052420&sr=1-10

http://www.amazon.com/Seiko-SNK793-Stainless-Steel-Automatic/dp/B002SSUQF6/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1381052688&sr=8-3&keywords=seiko+5

>>7022755
So which one is real? The one with the sticker or without?

>>7022800
to be honest there's probably no difference between the first two, just slightly different designs, citizen is better known but they are both simple cheap watches that run on a battery

the Seiko you posted is actually an automatic (runs using gears and rotor as opposed to battery and circuitry) so instead of a ticking second hand it will smoothly sweep around the dial - something nearly all watch enthusiasts prefer

If you like the look, I'd go the seiko just for the sweeping seconds hand, it's so much cooler to look at. Also, it winds itself as you wear it, you don't need to replace a battery

>>7022507
Yeah, I've heard of guys like that. And honestly, from a certain perspective, it makes a lot of sense: would you rather have one truly nice, expensive watch or many decent replicas for different occasions?

As for distinguishability, it's getting harder and harder to tell. To the untrained eye, they can be identical. The main differences now are quality control (this will probably always make the difference), movement finishing (you won't see finely engraved movements), occasional dial printing issues (rare these days), and post-purchase service. When you consider the price of a genuine vs the replica, is the extra money worth it?

As an example, I considered getting a replica Daytona a while back because getting an auto chrono for less than $200 from a legitimate brand is next to impossible. The Daytona replica uses the A7753 or 3LZF1 which is thicker than the genuine Rolex Daytona movement. As a result, the case is also thicker. The subdials on that A7753 are also spaced slightly farther, but not enough to tell unless you are familiar with both. The biggest external "tell" will be the layout of the subdials. Modern Daytonas have sub-seconds at 6, 30-min totalizer at 3, and 12-hr totalizer at 9 . Unfortunately, the A7753 switches the position of the sub-seconds and the 12-hr subdials. Some replicas just use the A7753 position; others attempt to switch to the genuine layout with a long train of gears that usually end up killing the movement.

If I didn't explain it all here, would the average person have been able to tell?

>>7022588
Did prefer the orion but the face has a weird sparkly effect to it, seemed a tad formal for a daily wearer.

Tangente is not /fa/.

>>7022804
top is real

What does /fa/ think of this? It's called Longines Conquest Colum Wheel. Anyone have any experience with the brand? Considering it as a christmas present for myself.

>>7022828
Lets do one without the obvious tell of a sticker over the serial

What is the difference between these two?

>>7022849

>>7022842
nice watches, but that price point will give you a lot of options, some that you might think better in that style so I suggest shopping around.

look up a review of it, might find one on watchuseek.com

>>7022849
lol fuck you faggot, it's so easy to tell >>7022851 left is real
and I don't even like Panerai I literally couldnt list you one of their models because they're fuck ugly

>>7022842
I wish there were some kind of free online encyclopedia.

>>7022804
>>7022849
This ain't gonna work because it's 50/50.
I'd love to see people try to pick a gen out of several reps.

>>7022858
I said whats the difference faggot

>>7022859
not 50/50 at all, the strap is orange ffs as if that would ever pass for leather

>>7022858
>>7022866

Hahaha you faggots are wrong. He put the real one in the shitty strap to show that the strap is the only tell.

The fake is the one with the legit strap.

gg hold the re

>>7022614
lol no i've never been a fan of Panerais, but I also know that most people claiming to have a fake so good you'd think it was real is just bullshit.

That said, watches that use ETA movements which can be easily obtained and ripped off then interchanged with genuine parts from the manufacturer for stuff like dials and such can pass for good... but that's so much effort...

in general I just think fakes are a fucking joke, if you need to wear fakes then you need to reassess your life.

>>7022866
A brand new light brown strap could easily pass for orange. But notice that the "tell" was the strap. I'm not familiar with the tells of Panerai reps, but honestly looking at those two, I see no obvious tells with the watch heads alone. With only two watches, I have a 50/50 shot if I guess and if I'm right, I get to prance around like I actually know what I'm talking about even when I probably don't. Seem familiar?

>>7022872
And yet the people here can't even tell the difference without looking at the strap..

I think the real joke is panerai's design team

>>7022870
top kek
look at the case finishing, look at how cloudy the crystal is by comparison, look at how the lume dots aren't raised because they're probably not applied
left is real

>>7022879
So why would he cover the serial on the fake?


>tfw you think the real looks like fake shit next to the fake

my sides.. oh god my sides

>>7022851
what are those tabs on sides?

>>7022879
>>7022889

wrekt

>>7009219
I don't wear watches, but I own this.
Torino Lamborghini chronometer something.

>>7022911
They lock the crown.

hallo hallo

>>7022940
I know that swatch

>>7022940
I can just barely tell that this is the Swatch Body and Soul.

>>7022946
>>7022947

:DDDD yeeeees

>>7022889
to throw you off the scent!

does anyone have source of these photos to actually verify this

my daily

>>7022952
You got shit on bro, everyone knows you were just talking out your ass now

>>7022985
you got me good bro, boy do I look silly

>>7022878
yeah... low res photos on the internet and a sample size of handful sure proves your point...

>>7023011
>implying only one person would think youre full of shit

>>7023017
You sure proved your point when you said the real one looked like shit and the fake one was obviously real...

>>7022940
Hideous.

>>7023024
nah that was me, you're talkin to a namefag now, try to keep up

>>7023057
lol rekt

I'm digging this timex with a nato strap.

My trusty daily.

>>7023057
>>7023062

>>7023078
>tachymeter on a timex
what the fuck lol

>>7023075
>>butthurt

The Rolex Explorer is more fa than the Rolex Submariner

proob me wrong niggers

19 euros

>>7023104

>>7023113

>>7023121

Rolex Milgauss. Been wearing it for about two months. Great watch but it is a scratch magnet.

>>7023127
Nice watch, I like the Milgauss, I'd like to see one a mesh band

>>7023132
that is, if it wasn't the way that changing anything about a rolex makes it look fake because you're not allowed to not like anything about the original...

>>7023104
It's a great classic utilitarian design, but I'm so over it.

I think the Day Date now is the only rolex i really enjoy looking at.

>>7023150
day-dates are only made with precious metals like platinum and shit, they're rediculous.

the date-just on the other hand, well okay

Considering buying this imminently. Probably the automatic version.

What do you think?

>>7023173
>>7023150
>>7023127
>>7023126
>>7023121
>>7023113
>>7023104

Pretty much every rolex is ugly

>>7023173
yeah i know, I have a datejust. The old ma has a president in Rose Gold... damn fine watch.

>>7023172
not my cup of tea
what do you think of the Seamaster AquaTerra?

I wear this even though I know /fa/ hates it and it looks fucking ridiculous.

>>7023199
I've got quit skinny wrists. Anything with a big face looks ridiculous. Not sure I'd be happy with one that's been advertised by James Bond.

>>7022858
>nice watches, but that price point will give you a lot of options, some that you might think better in that style so I suggest shopping around.

I've been looking around for a while now, that's pretty much the look I want. Any suggestions in 1000-2000€ range tho? I like the Speedmaster style, sharp, clean and "timeless" chrono, but I don't want to spend Omega money at this point. I want quality too, something that doesn't break after 2 months (so no used Rollies ;-)

>>7022859
>I wish there were some kind of free online encyclopedia.

I know my way around google, thankyouverymuch, I just thought there might be some first hand experience here with the brand.

>>7023426
get a used speedmaster

>>7022449 here


>>7022507, I know I used to wear fakes all the time and people believed it because my family is kind of well off.

>>7022539

This.

Yea bitch
>pic related

>>7010837
w2c please?

>>7022824
Maybe you should spend that time finding yourself a job that earns a comfortable salary rather than investing time into learning about and purchasing fake watches.

>>7023912
>my family is kind of well off

If they were, you wouldn't have had to purchased a fake watch in the first place.

>>7018335
whur2cop?

>>7022851
For this image, fake watch is the one on the left. One easy tell? The crownguard's circular pin. Left is poorly fitted in comparison to the right which fits perfectly.

>>7022804
Tell for this Panerai is the crown quality (look at the polish), movement(you need to look at incabloc/balance wheel), and engraving depth. Top is real. I'm glad Panerai is moving towards open caseback for most of their future watches with in-house movements.

>>7023943
/v/ pls go

>>7010695
w2c?

opinions /fa/?

Jesus christ, I posted a thread instead of commenting.

>>7024140

You sound like Patrick Bateman. I don't mean that as a compliment.

bumo

>>7024238
I'm not a fan of its looks.

Aside from that, knowing Lacoste, chances are you'll be paying much more than you'll be getting.

>>7024238
>buying watches from asos

What do you guys think of Stuhrling, which seems to be perpetually on sale at Gilt? They have some nice looking designs.

>>7024848
http://www.tractionink.com/watch_wiki/index.php?title=Stuhrling_Original

They're ok. But I never like their designs much; they have a lot of Skeletons.

>>7024140
Are you some kind of retard?

>>7025707
Are you the faggot with the fake Breitling who comes from a 'well off family'?

>>7025712
>implying only one person would think youre a retard

>>7025719
>implying I'm that poster

>>7025728
>implying implications

>>7025758
>implying implicating implication

If fashion is about style then I probably have the most /fa/ watch here...

> inb4 style of a fifth grader

>>7023106
w2c?

>>7009219
>tfw gf knows I love watches
>tfw gift for my bday

Bump!

>>7026459

Does she still have the receipt? Just say it's too small or is irritating your skin or something and swap it for something you like.

>>7025712

>fake breitling

It's a Breil, you dolt. And that's my point, my 600 euro watch works just as well as a 6000 euro Breitling and the only people that care are pretentious suckers like you.
To you being well off probably means having a house in the Hamptons, but for most people on the planet it means you can pay your mortgage and do what you want (to a certain extent) without having to worry too much about making it to the end of the month/quarter/year/decade.

>>7025883

My man, got the same one and I love it.

1985 Swatch, 1956 Longines 19A (Automatic), Seiko "5" SNK805 (Automatic), 1936 Bulova (hand-wind)

how sweet is my watch

fraggits

>>7029763
>IOS 6
step up, grandpa

>>7029763
That's a phone, dude

>>7015041
Zach pls go.

>>7029822
its also a watch

>>7022100
Without that unnecessary hole in dial it would be quite nice.
It looks like toy, fedoracore.

>>7029763
you look like such a nerd wearing one of those though

>>7030102
>unecessary

shows off that it's an expensive watch

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTj__XKPl5M

and nt just some shitty miyota quartz movement in a plastic spacer

>>7029907
it's not also a watch. just because it tells you time doesn't mean it's a watch

>>7030132
Shows off that you're a douchebag with no taste.
Why would you tell people you have expensive stuff?
It's like wearing gold watch or skeleton or something like that.

>>7022079
psstt.. they're not his watches.

H-how is this, /fa/?

>>7029735
Admiring heavily.

>>7032421
If you like it, it's alright.

>>7033324
>>If you like it, it's alright.

i think that should be the mantra

>>7033801
But Miffy, what if I like fakes?

This is my only watch so far, trying to get more. What does /fa/ think?

>>7033832
Then you've got some real soul searching to do.

It's the same with fake geos, people who know what they are will look at the rest of the outfit and immediately presume they're fake... those who don't know won't give a shit.

You've got to realise it's even worse with watches, people who know their watches FUCKING KNOW their watches because it's become such a huge status symbol.

yes yes there are good fakes, but again, all they'd need to do is look at the rest of you to know you wouldn't be able to afford a wristpiece that costs 4 digits.

>>7034033
But Miffy:
>2013
>being concerned with the opinions of others
>not dressing for yourself

>>7034073
... are you actually saying wearing fakes is dressing for yourself?

Have some self respect buddy.

>>7034094
I don't think the possibility ought to be excluded outright simply because the item in question is fake. If a certain look of sufficient quality (as opposed to extraneous quality) is all that is required, then the opinions of others be fucked: wear as one sees fit. Isn't that something we usually hold dear? That the individual refuses to conform to the trend and breaks off to form his/her own style?

Perhaps I'm contradicting myself implicitly: fake watches and dreamboxes are more part of the trend than against it. Going by what I said earlier, where does fedora-core lie in this conversation? Whatever the case, I think it's an interesting discussion.

>>7034132
I just think you're all better than fakes, cause you're all real to me.

>>7009219
ITT: jelly poorfafs

>>7034179
If you're gonna rub a rollex in my face, at least post one that isnt ugly as fuck

>>7034187
>fox and the grapes

203vs104?

R8 m8

>fossil

>>7033863
Too bling.

>>7034667
2nd one.

>>7034723
I can't imagine either being pulled off well.

>>7034667
2nd one with the first one's strap.
or just the first one.

>>7034753
:(

I like though and get compliments

>>7034207
>it's expensive so it's good

gee being stupid sure is easy

2cop or not 2cop

>>7030102
watch mechanics are fucking awesome to look at
it's like having a 3 dimensional screensaver on your goddamn wrist

My current favorite

I have a Bapex x (W)taps submariner clone, I have no idea about the internals - only that it's a kinetic watch. The movement as far as I can tell replicates the Rolex counterpart it's trying to emulate and it's fairly subtle for being a Bape product.

>>7034207

nope, that dude is "right on the money" because that is one UGGGGGGLLLYYYY watch. You can't buy taste, dipshit.

>>7010695
Is that custom band? Also that's a beautiful watch, what's the model?

>>7035043

Hublot is pretty gross but my wrist has a boner for those PP's

>>7024238
Model #/name??

>>7035235

Way to make his point for him. If your idea of fashion is something that is similar to screensavers you might as well just give up now and save us all the trouble of making fun of you.

>>7035337
I was trying to say that it is incredibly aesthetically pleasing, the only thing I could think of was screensavers, but it's probably more like watching a fractal
>save us all the trouble of making fun of you.
lol okay mate, you sound 15 years old

>>7035343

>my notion of fashion is maybe more like looking at math

Ok friend, you enjoy that.

>why would someone make fun of someone for bad fashion?

lol, okay mate, you sound like you've been here for 15 minutes.

>>7035346
I'm not YRP but don't be autistic, fa is about aesthetics and a watch can be as mesmerizing at a screensaver.

>>7035346

>>7035043

Not trying to knock your shit, but I never understand the appeal of Patek Philippe watches.
They look so bland and boring and they don't really keep time that accurate. I guess it's the idea and the status that comes along with it.

But well done if those are real and yours.

No idea why they don't make this in an automatic.

>>7035321
naah, it's shit.

>>7035573
are you sure they don't? I thought they had just about everything in either auto and quartz

if not there are plenty of other options, chin up nigga

Got a submariner for a while. Might buy it. But the seller has small wrists. Cunt.

>>7034753
The Stuhrling is Ceramic if that makes any difference on the 'bling' factor. It goes well with most of my menswear outfits.

>>7011007
that comment cracked me up for no reason, thank you anon

>>7036009

Divers with SS bands belong in the 80s. They just scream "I know I'm a giant pussy, maybe this will make me look more like a teamster.."