/fa/ - Fashion

>wearing sneakers
lel

>>6829637
>being a dad and browsing 4chan

Nike
>Choice of reatarded 'sneakerheads' everywhere

Adidas
>Shit designs and copycats: the companty

New Balance
>Timeless designs that look great with any clothing

Look at those trainers and tell me tehy do not look good

>>6829733
Forgot pic

>Nike
Are you a drug dealer?

Adidas forever

>yfw the nike jews have you hypnotized.

>>6829739
Big fucking N that covers 30% of the side of the sneaker
>looks good
You must be fucking kidding me

>wearing ASICS/ Bowermans for anything other than XC running

I see these fucking shits on my local track all the time it's like do you even run?

Roshe runs are not that great

>>6829753
Big fucking tick that covers 30% of the side of the sneaker
>looks good
You must be fucking kidding me

>>6829753
>learned on /fa/ that branding is never acceptable
>didn't learn when to bend that rule

fucking spoon fed fuccbois

On a serious note why is Nike so glorified here?

Is it simply because MUH KANYE?

>>6829779
Oh lord i hate kanye so much
the reason i stopped going on /mu/

>>6829762
How autistic are you
The check doesn't cover 30% and atleast It's not a fucking N

>>6829779

their shoes are classics and decently made

>>6829779

The certain models of Nikes are functional for running, but not fashionable.

So yeah, Kanye, but most people call them fashionable ironically.

>>6829779
Because of autism

>>6829786
How autistic are you
The N doesn't cover 30% and at least it's not a fucking tick

>>6829768
it's like people who learn that pointless extra stitching on a shoe is bad so they hate moccasins

some people just learn style rules but don't understand why they exist

>>6829782
>>6829783
>>6829785
>>6829786

So what is the true patrician choice when it comes to effay sneakers? Nike, Adidas, New Balance, other?

>>6829795
drips

>>6829795

>>6829795
Reebok

>>6829805
they be fugly dawg

>>6829795
other. I think NB are cool if you're going really nerdcore though.

>>6829794
pretty much this

>hurr boat shoes with a sneaker sole, how is it any different than ugly sperry bro shit

>>6829805
do they still sell these? i tried to find out w2c when you posted them before

those are my grails

>>6829825
haven has them

I saw them in-person the other day

they looked very nice

I touched them

great experience

>>6829831
also, haven finally has a picture of these ones starting to darken

>>6829831
>tfw when you would wear these and would feel incredibly depressed once they got there first speck of dirt on them

>>6829816
In the UK Reebok is chav/junkie/benefit scrounger tier

>>6829839
expensive clothes aren't for you m8

>>6829839
they're supposed to end up looking really worn and shit, that's the point of the natural leather

>>6829847
seems cool 2 me

So I just got 2 pairs of Levis 508s in the mail. 1 is black, 1 is green. They're both the same size (30x32), but the black pair is much more stretchy and comfortable while the green pair is too tight everywhere. The green pair is 98% cotton, 2% elastane while the black pair is 99% cotton, 1% elastane. What's the deal? Is it possible to get this kinda stretchiness without black jeans?

Nike is such shit value in Yurop. Air Max cost 95 quid over here and a pair of those made in not shit tier country New Balance cost the same price. I know which I'd choose

>>6829843
i would wear these out for sure

>>6829843
thanks

>>6829861
Wow, woops. Wrong thread.

I want these but I would want to switch to eggshell colored laces

>>6829795

designer

Raf Simons/Common Projects/Rick Owens/CCP

>>6829883
They're nice

Makes me remember also what in your opinion are the best styles of New Balance? 574,547,420 etc.

>>6829847
Im pretty sure Robert Smith wears Reebok
look a lot like these>>6829864

>>6829847
It's true. I think there was a statistic where most thieves wear reebok shoes. lol

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1250234/Beware-Reebok-Classic-wearer--60-trainer-revealed-burglars-favourite.html

>>6829795
Qasa master race

>>6829962
more like this year's Air Maxes if anything
winning a small following but not sleek enough to win mainstream appeal

>>6829942
> le roshe copycat face

These will be this years Roshes calling it now

>>6829966
wot

Air Maxes are more popular and common than Roshes

>>6829975
but only in elementary schools and low income neighborhoods
in the context of people that actually care how they dress I see Roshes way more often

>>6829981
I like Roshes but there are now mostly popular among Swagfags or LADtypes which is not a good thing for image of the shoe. Airmax suffers the same problem. Some colourways of both shoe can both look very good but i think the shoes I posted are similar to Roshes so will capture some fans of them

>>6829962
Shit nigga
When do these come out

Can't w8 tocop these when they come out

>>6830010
October in the UK apparently

>>6829792
not op
what a fucking autist LOL

Would these be a good cop?

>>6830037
god no

>>6830014
would get manky within 1 hour of wearing

>>6830037
Are you a poorly dressed ethnic person?

>>6830094
I am 1/8th slav

le bump

What is a good shoe to wear with my varsity jacket? Roshe? New Balance?

adidas cool dude reporting

reebok next on the agenda
we goin in

>>6832511
Any frat shoe

nike are shit though

>>6829632
Onitsuka Tiger master race reporting.

>>6832543
Two of the most boring shoe brands

Tried and true since 1917

>>6832674
except youre wrong

dont reply

>>6829779
They've a lot of different looks, they're relatively cheap, and relatively well made.

>tfw no lapsang souchong smoky deliciousness shoe

http://www.endclothing.com/new-balance-m576tbr.html

>>6832692
>that ugly bleached-white color

>>6832692
check out these bad boys purchased in the early 80's

>>6829981
>people from low income neighborhoods don't care about how they dress

also lots of people wear air maxes

roshes are the shoes that people buy because they wanted the more expensive nikes but settled

>>6829632
I ask myself the same thing every time i see them on /fa/, you're not alone m8

>>6829739
they do not look good

>>6832722
They look normal after a week of normal wear or so

>>6832736
Were those still made in the U.S.A.?

A lot of the shoes New Balance make would be good if they didn't have a huge fucking N on he side of the shoe.
Logos are cool and all and following what Nike do with the tick isn't a bad way to go but the problem with the N is hat it appears to go against the flow of the shoe in a way where the focal point is always going to be the huge fucking N.

They could have gone with anything else to blend in with the shoe and it would have made them better.

>>6832772
Pls stop talking out your ass and forget about the rules in MUH STICKY

>>6832769
not sure. They were actually my dads, he gave them to me cause he was never going to wear them.

they're starting to fall apart though, unfortunately.

>>6832769
good, I've been thinking about getting a pair of white low top purcells as my next shoe purchase.

so many people at my uni have chucks, I love the look, but want to be at least a little different.

>>6832809
The good thing about chucks is that they are so universal that they look different every time a different context is added

I wouldn't buy into purcells just to be different but if you like them, I don't see why not

>>6832542
whats a frat shoe? Boat shoes obvs, but what else?

>>6834577
Lightly beaten penny loafers
Running shoes with bad cargo shorts.

>>6829962

shit those look amazing

>Nike
lol let me guess you wear AF1s right?

>are you into sports
>no
Don't buy Nike.

>are you into sports
>yes
Only buy nike.
Seriously, they blow the fucking water out of everyone.

>>6834594
when are you going to start tripping

pls respond