/fa/ - Fashion

>>6736714
yes

also, does anyone know approximately how long the standard laces for them are?

cargos or geos?

>>6736890
I like them OP. But I want a second opinion on these, resoled Dunks with vibram soles. anyone like or dislike? I can't decide.

>>6737442
haha wtf def fucked up the shoe

>>6737442
those are weird aff but kinda cool

how much?

>>6737447
yeah it sort of looks weird, but I sort of like it. Might trade my Raf Holos for them

>>6737458
trade for Raf Holos

>>6737442
I'm like 95% sure those are fake
So much is off
The lining inside should be black
behind the tongue should be black
Just overall looks wrong

>>6737523
They are fake. You have a good eye.

>>6737464
depends which raf holos theres like 3+

>>6737536
Here's more pics, you guys sure?

>>6737536

they are probably relined dumbshit

leather looks read, plus nobody would be bothered enought to resole fakes

>>6737546
the Velcro high tops, sorry

>>6737554

>>6737549
Ask for a photo of the rick label on the inside sole.

>>6737558

>>6737554
if theyre real dunks id trade, but i love dunks and dont really like raf holos

>>6737561
Already have one

>>6737549
They look fake judging by the:
different swoosh logo
really shiny leather
very thin outer sole

>>6737570

Confirming these for fake
Take a look where the white meets the black on the toebox.
Swoosh is also retarded high.
Whoever buys these please know what you are getting into.

>>6737570
>>6737579
Font is /very/ off.
Also tongue shape is wrong

>>6737561
only dreambox fakes will have the dreambox logo there

and i dont know if dreambox does fakes of dunks

>>6737582
it's me, and I'm not buying it would be a trade for my Raf holo Velcros. Are you sure these are fake? Even with the inside? It wouldn't kill me not to trade my Rafs because I love them but I like these as well

>>6737558
The outer sole is extremely thin. Could be due to old age, not sure. I'd be careful.

>>6737442
real or not

a better question is why the fuck would someone resole geos with vibram?

>>6737627
those arent geos

and im guessing someone would resole a shoe because the sole wore out

>>6737594
Don't do it.
I have a pair of ricks in this cw and they are very different.

>>6737609
Yeah it does look pretty thin but there are staples which is strange

>>6737640
Cool, thanks bro. Any chance you'd trade them to me? Haha

>>6737641
Ask for a close up picture of the sole so you can better gauge the thickness of it.

>>6737646
It took me ~6 months to find mine.
you'll find yours : )

>>6737654
How much did you get them for if you don't mind me asking?

>>6737564
It's hard to tell since the picture quality is so shit but that doesn't look like real leather.

>>6737668
$500 on the dot.
They were absolutely DESTROYED like 2/10
Took them to a local cobbler to get cleaned and resoled/ fix up the paint.
They are looking far better than when I bought them.
Used dunks will run anywhere from $400-1200. New I've seen go for over 2k on ebay -__-

>>6737570
Why is the R spelled differently?

>>6737716
the paint?

>>6737725
Yep.
Like this pair wasnt even wearable.
Let me see if I can find some pictures of how they used to look I got them somewhere

>>6737758
Pls do
Very interested

>>6737784
I couldnt find the picture of /exactly/ when I got them/
This is after the first repair of getting new insoles and some cleaning of the outsole
(apologies for not having the pictures of them really destroyed.)
They went through a couple of more repairs after this photo was taken.

eww. take out those laces. they're only cool if you take the laces off

>>6737442
clearly fake
>>6736714
hard to pull off here is the only picture i've seen them in that i liked