/fa/ - Fashion

>>6728634
Just messing around with new coat. What do you guys think?

>>6728683
the fit on the left is cool af, but your jeans are to skinny

>>6728683

that's a bunch of stuff I wouldn't normally like but you pulled it together pretty well dude

wiwt

>>6728683
w2c rose shirt?

Got a new pair of AF-1s

>>6728714
wow nice face
you look surprised
so original

>>6728683
Same coat. 1/3

>>6728714
how much?

>>6728714
lets see the back bby gurl

>>6728714
R U A GRILL???

>>6728683
6/10. Don't like the shoes & don't like the silhouette and the neck on the first n second doesn't work with that coat neck n don't like the color on third with the red shirt. Can't really tell the coat color so i'm going to assume it's black but a lighter black because of the material than the jeans.

>>6728718
2/3

>>6728683
like these, although i prefer the rose tee to the red shirt, maybe because it gives more contrast.

>>6728714
please dont take this like the pervs here on /fa/, But you look really beautiful.

Pants look like shit in this pic. I can take a better pic of them if you guys think it's necessary.
The white thing on the cardigan is dirt in the mirror.

>>6728683
pretty good. i have the same parka i think

>>6728714
this is really unflattering

>>6728719
I dont have time for your criticisms anon

>>6728721
tree fiddy

>>6728723
what is a bby?

>>6728725
no

>>6728738
thanks

>>6728740
y-you too

>>6728718
way better from the side 8/10.. still don't like the shoes

>>6728683
imo the first and the third are best, i'm not crazy about the second pair of shoes

the coat looks good albeit a tad large

>>6728729
3/3

>>6728714
i c ur bra

>>6728743
i'm a different person

>>6728753
best spacecore ever w7c long armed body warmer?

>>6728683

10/10 sick fits m8

>>6728731

fucking lel'd hard

>>6728731
I think you can't really pull off a cardigan, very few males can, just saying. also different shoes with jeans

>>6728705
>>6728733
>>6728739
>>6728756
Thanks
>>6728718
>>6728733
did you think it i was huge as-well? it comes downs to me knees
>>6728714
lastbutwon

>>6728746
post back plz grl im thirsty and u want the attention anywayz

>>6728718
>>6728729
would prolly wear
parka looks kinda huge from the side but i assume it's the pic and you don't have a huge misshapen body
prefer the tims to docs but that's b/c i don't rly like red shoes

>>6728683
that rose shirts is dope man.
>>6728715
>skärmavbild
New old AF1's or icy sole? v-nice regardless.
>>6728753
Awesome.
>>6728731
Shoes pls.

>>6728753
cool photo especially of the shoes but I bet it looks not so great irl

>>6728765

U mean the jacket? Christopher Raeburn SS13. Sold out I think but there's one in green, small, here: http://www.oki-ni.com/outerwear/christopher-raeburn-lightweight-hooded-zip-front-jacket-crb1604olv.html

>>6728714
holy shit your head is enormous
i think its even bigger than mine Lol

>>6728793
i thot we were friends pal ;_;

>>6728714
Nice fit & his shirt is from Black scale bro

>>6728793
dropped

dont shit talk my waifu like that again unless you want a knuckle sandwich

>>6728746
>tree fiddy
>no to an obviously rhetorical question
>y-you too
>i dont have to for criticism because i only posted this picture for attention
god you're fucking insufferable

>>6728714
might be improved if your skirt sat a bit lower, proportions look strange... i think it's the skirt's volume, something sleeker would work better

i also don't like the thigh high socks, or visible bright pink bra

>>6728753
jacket looks a lil short, but probs for posting a lunarcore fit i guess

>>6728799
having a vig head isnt inherantly a bad thing

>>6728805
sorry ;_;

>>6728801
thx m8

>>6728802
w-wow anon so alpha, i need to change my panties

>>6728806
Thanks for the feedback m8, i'll try to find a better skirt

>>6728715
i fux w/ this

>>6728806
agree, sits too high on the waist for your bodytype

>>6728793
big heads on small bodies are attractive on women

>>6728753
what shoes

>>6728683
w2c shirt?
also nice fits
espacially left one

>>6728822
it's just a shit-tier skirt like anything else in her wardrobe

i don't think it would look good on any body type

>>6728701
If you have the legs you may as well show them off

>>6728683
damn nigga how tall is you

also
good fit but i think the parka is a tad too long (sleeve length)

>>6728829

Nike Field General Free QS

>>6728832
true man, i got it for like, 7 bucks at h&m so its bound to be shit

>>6728825
>>6728819
oh thanks then matt-kun

>>6728753
wot trouserz

>>6728849

http://www.yoox.com/us/36384408NW/item?dept=men#sts=sr_men80&cod10=36384408WH&sizeId=

>>6728841
Not that guy but that's the price you pay for a parka that fits your body
It's like manufacturers don't know what a human body is

>>6728753
can you stop with the filters to bring out the saturation/contrast and stop with the angles

>>6728864

I use the angles to highlight details and textures. I'll stop with the filters tho I guess.

>>6728683
what nikes?

>>6728825
its more just that small bodies are attractive and a small body will make a normal sized head look big

>>6728881
janoski perforated black leather black. sold out m8.
>>6728841
only 5'10 but i have long limbs. i like how the sleeve is a bit too long tbh.
>>6728830
lastbut won, thanks.
>>6728786
>>6728768
ty

sorry for shit picture

sorry for shit picture

>>6728919
>sorry for shit outfit

you cant win b B)

Not very happy with today's outfit
Suggestions on how to improve it?

>>6728919
Mor elike sorry for shit everything


No but there is potential here. Since you are a skeleton i would recommend tighter jeans. The shoes are good. docs? right?


The tee is horrid, go for something more plain.

>>6728925

different pants. not pre-faded denim.

>>6728919
>>6728925
gross/10

>>6728925
Horrible jeans m8.

>>6728943
>>6728935
Thanks, couldn't put my finger on what was wrong

>>6728925
darker jeans less pleb shoes

>>6728919
tee is kinda horrible and illfitting
jeans are alright
can't really tell what's going on with the shoes, are they those canvas docs?

>>6728925
swap out the jeans for something black, sweats/chinos/jeans, whatever, the faded denim clashes w/ the vaguely tech jacket and shoes

>>6728901
insane mate
you're like 1cm taller than me and u seem 6'3
wtf shiet

>>6728919
Ditch the shirt, are those Doc Marten Alfies?

>>6728961

Is... is this real life?

>>6728961
Columbine/10

>>6728959
Improvement?
Not sure I can pull off all black

>>6728961
Леха, ты че на форчане забыл?

>>6728961
school shooter core

>>6728934
>>6728957
>>6728958
tobias

>>6728992
the way you are standing is gonna make it look worse :)
it's good form to not hold your feet apart like that.

>>6728992
much better bro.

No offence but your face looks kind of fat. It would help not looking like a loser in black if you shaved and lost weight.

But the outfit is alright now, way better.

>>6728683
fuuuuk,
looks sick,
post more.
this is just a mess around fit btw, dont take it too seriously, i know it looks dum

>>6728992
>Not sure I can pull off all black
Dude, everyone can go all black. Much better.

>>6729006
If the trousers fit better this would be great.

btw w2c shoes?

>>6728992
you need some new shoes brotato.

>>6729004
Hard to shave when you're on holiday and haven't got around to getting shaving cream. I'm usually clean though
Yeah, not sure why my face looks fat there but it's actually extremely long and quite angular

>>6729006
w2c jacket

>>6729006
so are you wearing like a blue and gold jacket with blue pants and blue shoes and a blue and white button down?

>>6729049
there's no way in hell that face is angular

>>6729034
Nikes no good anymore?Thought they were a safe brand

I have no idea what i'm doing

>no shoes because I'm studying at home

>>6728992
much better, but yeah shave
and put your sleeves back down
and unzip at least partway

>>6729062

oops

captcha: sorynew hear
lol

>>6729051
Just because /fa/ circlejerk roshes doesn't mean every shoe nike has ever made is safe.

>>6729051
sorry to break it to you but nikes never were good with jeans. I mean, niether are 99% of tennis shoes imo

>>6729000
oic, same shape as the alfies (which get posted a ton, but i'm not a fan of canvas boots)

>>6729072
I like it.

>>6729006
averageteenager.jpg

>>6729074
i disagree with this

>>6728683
w2c similar parka?

>>6729001
Wasn't really thinking about my stance but noted
>>6729065
done, done & done

>>6729074
I've seen so many people pull it off really well, thought i'd give it a shot

>>6729072
don't like the cardigan really. the colors are pretty good though, may even go with a lighter brown on the belt and 'shoes' when you actually wear

>>6729074
Flyknits, roshe and Af1 are awesome. eat shit.

>>6728786
>Skärmbild
had to change the size of the pic

>>6728820
u wot m8

>>6729072
nearly really good, but jeans too tight for baggy cardigan imo, if they were a lil bit looser this'd be great
and do another shirt button up pls

>>6729074
nah nikes are good w/ jeans (not always)

>>6729095
it was a compliment

>>6729083
come now, can you really say he wouldn't look better in different shoes?

>>6729087
http://nelly.com/uk/mens-fashion/clothing/jackets-and-coats/cheap-monday-433/bayani-parka-433873-14/


Beware its a huge.

>>6729090
>i'm mad and a newfag. I love shitty sneakers with jeans
----


>>6729093
please by all means post pictures of people who pull it off well. Show me the money and i'll change my stance.

>>6729113
Was irl

>>6729113
What sneakers do you wear?

>inb4 raff simons/rick owens

>>6729111
sorry I think it makes you look like uncultured swine with cheap shitty sweatshop shoes on. You gonna go running in your jeans or something? lmao.

>>6729119
I don't wear sneakers unless i'm working out or doing athletics really, thats kind of the point. Not to say sneakers look bad with all pants but with jeans it kind of ruins the look imo

>>6729120
nah but i might walk a lot

i get where you're coming from and yeah i'm not a fan of flyknits and jeans but i think jeans can work w/ a lot of nikes

>>6729156
top is bulky

>>6729156
like it dan

>>6729156
Shit.

How long have you been here and you still look awful.

>>6729151
just because you have to walk alot doesnt make the shoe look any better. I understand the practicality though. I just don't think jeans with nikes work. That picture related looks trashy. Would look 100x better with a dress boot or even loafer

>>6729170
u wrng mate imo
would b intrsd to see a fit from u no ofence

>>6729156

I'm feeling your terrorist beard Dan

>>6729156
dan confirmed for the only rugged and manly poster on /fa/

>>6729099

my mirror is at a weird angle (haven't put it on the wall yet) and it makes my legs look super skinny. I do wish these jeans were baggier, but I spent my money on my dark blue United Dry Goods and black Nudies...

How's this?

>>6729170
Im respectfully gonna disagree with you

>>6729183
>rugged and manly
more like fat and hairy

>>6729195
bretty gud

>>6729195
You went too skinny with the jeans.

>>6729170
you're entitled to your opinion man, i don't think we're gonna change each other's opinions, i'm the same way about certain things

have a nice day

>>6729195

That camel sweater is really close to your skin tone. Maybe charcoal, green, blue or purple would be better. This whole fit would work better with raw denim.

>>6728683
w2c jacket in canada

>>6729203

they're 511's

I love bleached jeans, though, so what brand should I get? I live in Ottawa, aka hard to find anything good.

>>6729195

Are you wearing a linen shirt? If so, it doesn't really make sense to wear a sweater over it imo

>>6729201
>tall
>big rounded shoulders
>full beard
>got so much testosterone he can't keep his hair

He's pretty manly, tbh.

>>6729213

cool opinion dan

>>6729215
>They're 511's

They're also 2 skinny m8, atleast while you wear that sweater

I have the same sweater tho so its nice to see it in a fit

>>6729205

I still like it. I've got a green v-neck and a dark blue crew, but they're not very late summer/early fall.

>>6729212
no it's oxford cloth.
This isn't something I'll keep on today, mind you. That's why I had my shirt almost completely undone and was wearing a cardigan, lol

>>6729202
thanks
I just started lurking here a week ago

>>6729217
lel

>>6729170

>jeans not working with Nikes

learn2streetwear. post after lurking some more

>>6729176
I'm not posting a fit. I just made the point so you and others would consider it.

Me posting a fit doesn't have anything to do with nike shoes and jeans. I'm not talking shit, just saying I rarely ever see Nike's or Tennis shoes working with jeans and not looking retarded. It's a less common combination in fashion magazines / runway / pr settings etc for a reason

>>6729006
stop spamming the same fit every thread

>>6728714

change your bra, the pink contrast looks bad, lose the long socks too

>>6729237
so how long have you been lurking? One year? two?

>>6729240
nah mate i'm not trying to be confrontational or make you prove yr taste. i just find ur opinion p unusual so i'd be rly interested to see yr tastes, that's all :)

>>6729240
Fuck off then dadcore cunt.

you cant just come in shitting on everything, offering no alternatives and then pretending you're totally right without even showing your own style. eats shit.

>>6729243
Holy shit, i though he looked like matt

>>6729195
much better (really nice sweater), point still stands about the jeans but ya know
(guy you're replying to fwiw)

>>6729215
acne if you can get it nearby, or i got some nice light acne jeans from ebay for like £30

>>6729259
to be fair he did offer some alternatives, there's no need to be a knob m8

>>6729266
No he didnt, he said all sneakers are bad with jeans.

>>6729262
he does

>>6729228
>while you wear that sweater

how about a t-shirt?

I'd rather not have spent money on jeans that don't fit right :\

>>6728683
>>6728718
how would a parka like these look on short people?
>tfw 5'6

approaching 1:10 images to posts ratio

get it together /fa/

>>6729270
probs not that good off the shelf atleast

>>6729270
Dibt bother m8.

>>6729259
What I see garner the most praise from people and looks the best is what I think is right, you buttranged autist. Just because /fa/ was all dickriding flyshits and roshes doesn't mean it looks good.

>>6729270

its all about proportions, look at uuuuhhhh hes like 5'5 and yet in his fitpics he looks tall and slender, just get one that fits well

>>6729270
Don't bother m8.

>>6729269
its possible
its just that ur sweater makes the jeans look goofy cuz of contrast (not colour, i mean texture, size)

i have 2 leave now tho

>>6729278
but it is good.

>>6729278

kewl opinion daniel

>>6729286

whoops I forgot to put the pic

Anyway thanks for the help!

>>6729297
That look rly bad. Sleeves too high shitty print. jeans are a bit too tight.

>>6729287
its the bane of modern society. How many people do you see each day wearing shitty jeans and flyknits and roshes?

How'd I do?

>>6729308
>its the bane of modern society.
Oh i see now.

Stick to your fedora .

>>6729312
>implying you have to wear a fedora to see how shitty the nike with jeans combo looks
You can still dress normal without sneakers and jeans anon.

>>6729311
trill af #realniggashit

>>6729273
yeah and suggested dress boots or loafers, which is at least an alternative

>>6729297
rolled sleeves look dodgy, i'd go for a slightly looser tee or at least a longer one

>>6729311
>toplel/10

>>6729307

noted about sleeves

I like the vintage NASA print and fuck it it was $4

did I at least get the right nudies?

learned to pinroll today, not sure if it worked out well

>>6729340
it didn't

>>6729344
k

>>6729334
the shirt looks kind of short and the sleeves are way big and would be better with either a jacket or long sleeves. the jeans seem to fit pretty fine.

>>6729334
yeah that looks better, and if you like it then keep it man, take /fa/ with a pinch of salt
i think the sweater fit was the best though

>>6729334

Much better. Put some boots and an MA-1 on and you're halfway to #casuallunarcore

>>6729354
all your fits look the same to me, they all mesh
idk how to critique you

>>6728753

dope fit

>>6729360
>lunarcore
at first I wasn't sure, but now I think I'm definitely down with it.

>>6729354
show from the front. One of the best you've posted. The grey with the black looks a little washed out but thats a tiny thing. Adore those shoes.

>>6729365

hmm idk, i guess you can critique my personal taste if you want. i mean you dont really have to critique me if you dont want to, im just sharing my outfit.

ive kind of figured out what i like to wear over time, and what i think looks good so i kind of stick to that

>>6729334
dont listen to the other kunt, sleeves rolled lookedd far better.

>>6729297

That outfit looks daft as fuck. Are u gay?

>>6729354
is that the yohji biker jacket?
looks good tho as usual

>>6729355

I got upset last week that I didn't like a lot of my fits so I started to rebuild my wardrobe.

I need new tshirts but I don't know how to fit them to my body (6'2" 165lbs) or where to look

>>6729354
mmmmm sexy

>>6729354
I feel like 86% of your posts its you trying to show off a certain item, like when you wore those cargo pants it was the only thing in shot, when you wear a rick tee you aim the camera up higher so the label is visible, when you wear geos that's where the camera is aimed

>>6729195

p good 'cept for the painted on jeans. the style works just get a pair that fits

>>6729384
i always trot this out but the uniqlo premium cotton innerwear tees are long, slim and cheap, although the white ones MAY be too thin for you if you're worried about showing your nipples or whatever (i just roll with it) - check measurements chart for, uh, measurements

>>6729388
86%
>99% of all statistics are made up

>>6729367

thx brade runna

>>6729360
>MA-1

any suggestions for a good brand?

>>6729361
I've got some OK jackets (vintage military, pointer duck canvas chore coat, cheap Zara pleather jacket and bomber, AmAp denim)
I want to save up and get one really nice one, though.

>>6729379
huh well maybe I'll stick with it then; I like them rolled more, too.

>>6729369

It's pretty much an extension of the functional militaria style, which you seem to appreciate. Also going to space is pretty manly.

>>6729386
>gay

no

>>6729396
>uniqlo
They don't ship to Canada, unfortunately. I'm willing to drop some cash on a shirt if it's perfect.

>>6729370

sure, here you go. and thanks!

>>6729421
cos don't either i presume?
these fit me for a cheap price so i stick with them, can't really suggest anything else, sorry mayn

>>6729388

well if i do, its not intentional, im sorry you feel that way

what is your interpretation of what im showing off in this outfit?

>>6729453
lol

first time poster. Bad angle but I haven't hung my mirror yet.

>>6729445

nope

I'll hunt around

>>6729453
quite nice, don't really like the shorts though (my gf has the same ones i think), i think something a bit less flimsy would look better w/ the sweater
feelin the sandals tho

>>6729458
are those yeezys real? why are you wearing them with that horrible jumper?

>>6729453
show the face
qt

>>6729436
is the jacket black or dark grey? It may just be the lighting in the first one that's making it look so light in comparation with the shoes, i'm going to assume its black though. I never save any waywts.. I think i've saved maybe one, but this one goes with it.

>>6729484
terrible picture taking my dude but i think i like it, depending entirely on how the shorts/cropped trousers look from a real view

>>6729472
They are. Because it's cold out and I have to buy new winter clothes.

>>6729474

the jackets black, here is a picture of it.

the reason the shoes look so much darker is that the light coming through the window hits my upper body more than my legs and feet, also the leather on the shoes is matte so they reflect very little light.

>>6729383

yeah it is, i wear it very often its one of my versatile things i own

>>6729385

:-)

>>6729493
That looks.... really cheap.

>>6729458

why are you wearing that sweatshirt with yeezy's
why are you wearing that sweatshirt at all

>>6729503
>i'm a pleb
ftfy

>>6729495

baggy w/ a forced taper past the knee due to drawstring

>>6729504
I get it. Ha, I'll burn the sweatshirt. I just need to buy new cold weather shit. Thinking about a few mastermind pieces but I don't know.

>>6729503

it takes awhile to be able to judge the quality of garments on sight, but if you give it time and look at lots of different clothes youll improve, especially if you have a strong interest in it

>>6729484
interesting

>>6729508
But it does look cheap. Not even that guy. I agree.

>>6729466
You're right about these particular shorts being a bit flimsy, altho they've lasted me 2 years so far. I have some flat front black shorts that I can wear with this next time, so will take the advice. :) Ty.

>>6729511
that's what i was hoping, sounds cool

>>6729516
that one looks better, but if I was only given the first pic I would say the same thing.

Really I think it's better if people speak their mind. We shouldn't be afraid of calling out a designer expensive designer piece.

>>6729532
yeah i didn't particularly mean low quality, but kind of structureless and lightweight compared to the relatively chunky/heavy sweater
yw

>>6729527

I think it's because it's a cotton material when a piece like that would normally be made of leather or suede. biker jackets are normally thick, tough items, but this one just isn't... but that doesn't mean it's not good quality.

also you really have to feel something, not just look at photos, to get a real sense of quality.

>>6729542

>Really I think it's better if people speak their mind.

i totally agree with you

>We shouldn't be afraid of calling out a designer expensive designer piece.

definitely not, but if you dont know how to differentiate between cheaper and high quality garments, it doesnt get you very far. for example, its very clear by the stitching, construction, detailing, and riri zippers on the front that its a very high quality garment. all im saying it that it takes practice to be able to look at how a garment is made and the details of it to be able to accurately tell whether something is low or high quality.

>>6729484
what are the pants?

>>6729131
hey buddy, heres where you went wrong with trying to bait me

>but with jeans it kind of ruins the look imo

gr8 b8 i rate it an 88/8

>>6729378
idk, i guess whenever i critique here im just trying to help people but yeah you look like you know what you're doing

>>6729558
I should clarify. Looks cheap is not the same thing as *is* cheap.

The jacket could be very well made.

But it still looks cheap.

apc
acne
levi
thrift

>>6729583
you think because you're a grill that changes anything?

First try at dressing better. Im from /o/ so usually kick about with coveralls on lol

I knkw its not really effay, but sure looks better than last time I went to a bar

>>6729571

>riri

http://www.complex.com/style/2012/09/the-10-most-overrated-clothing-details/riri-zippers

it's just more expensive brah

>>6729600

Not bad, take off the watch tho. Creates a weird line between your hairy arm and your hairless hand. Almost like you're wearing a long sleeve hair shirt.

>>6728771
>6728771
cheap monday bayani right? yeah, i'm 179cm, got a medium and it's really long and puffy and warm as dicks.
what's the point of the laces at the bottom? they look good but they annoy me when i'm walking

>>6729603
>complains about people being new
>doesnt recognize lelders sister, posted here thousands of times
again gr8 b8

>>6729602
that article is gash

>>6729627
how did people even find her? or was it just a publicity stunt?

>>6729603
dude thats my sister

>>6729602

>http://www.complex.com/style/2012/09/the-10-most-overrated-clothing-details/riri-zippers

>it's just more expensive brah

riri zippers actually are very high quality.

>>6729627
damn id have a 3some with you and her

>>6729619
I asked how long you posted for. I'm starting to think you're trying to b8 me.
>implying I know you're lelders sis or not

>>6729620
>complex is gash

ftfy

>>6729034
>brotato

lost hard

>>6729631
so are YYK. So are lots of zippers that aren't even branded. How about looking at things on a shot for shot basis instead of being a brandwhore?

And complex is stupid, but that article makes awesome points.

>>6729632
thanks so would i

>>6729650

>YYK

lol but I agree w u tho

>>6729638
>you're lelders sis

>48 KB, 400x600, 1376755801143.jpg

so are you new to the whole site too or

>>6729650
>I wish I had comme des garcons homie plus I may go ask for it for my next xmas present from dad after he fucks my butt

>>6729650

>complex is stupid

yeah

>but that article makes awesome points.

no it makes obvious points that arent even worth writing an article on. of course if you put riri zippers on a shit garment, the garment will still suck

although the reason many high end garments use riri zippers is because theyre high quality. i didnt say ykk are bad or lampo are bad youll note, just that riri makes high quality zippers.

>>6729659
yea because i'm autistic enough to read the filename and consider while my post was a question in the first place. You still didn't answer my question, I guess it is possible for you to be an oldfag with shit taste too though.

>>6729666
come to toronto matt-kun and we can work that out

>>6729666
that is the cutest picture ever.

u stil gettn them gets

>>6729679
ure a girl ye

>>6729683
lol :3

>>6729676
been here since mid 2012

what are you talking about shit taste, you said sneakers look bad with fucking jeans

still think youre kidding

>>6729675

lol do you realize you said "of course if you put riri zippers on a shit garment, the garment will still suck" but used your riri as evidence of your jacket being high quality?? maybe it's just a nice zip on a shit garment

>>6729156
dan you kinda look like of the dudes from loma prieta now

>>6729354
are those saturs?

>>6729709
Ann D

>>6729694
im the bigheaded grill bby

>>6729697
>mid 2012
okay well then you're semi-newfag, not that it has much bearing. The epiphany will come eventually though. I'm just going to assume that picture is your life story so far.

>>6729711
fuck they look good. great fit

>>6729700

>tripfags contradicting themselves and generally talking nonsense

NO WAY

>>6729700

the riri zips are a contributing factor that can allow you to figure out whether a garment is high quality or not. its not necessarily the only thing, but generally if a company is willing to spend the money for high end zippers, theyre also willing to spend money constructing the rest of the garment well. In the case of yohji's clothing, this is true, the rest of the garments are very high quality in terms of construction and fabric as well.

all i was doing is giving a little bit of advice in terms of finding clues of how to differentiate low from high quality garments. among other things are stitches per inch, the fabric covering the zippers giving a clean finish, the type of hardware used, the contrast silk facing on the interior, the detailing on the hem, etc.

>>6729725

you might re-read the posts, youll note that i didnt contradict myself if you do.

>>6729666
:D

>>6729716
>I'm just going to assume that picture is your life story so far
nice superiority complex there bud

that pic is old as fuck and gets reposted all the time

are you new and projecting or baiting me m8

>>6729713
>>6729679
stop

>>6729713
ok im deffo down ill start working on introducing the idea to my sis

how do i do that

>>6729746
I might be b8ing you a little now, but I wasn't originally. It's not really a superiority complex. I just have the highest hopes for you that you wont look like an autistic schoolchild after learning about fashion a little while longer.

>>6729759
hahahaaah how does it feel im gonna balls deep ur waifu!!!1

>>6729762
reported for blatant trolling

>>6729767

>>6729769
you really are new here.

>>6729006
horrible shirt

>>6729268
you look better matty

also a tiny bit thinner

w2c bucket hats under $50-70?

>>6729340
DBs with pants cuffed above them is boots/shorts tier.

>>6729418
Astronauts are pretty damn close to superhumans.

>>6729600
Pretty solid man. Almost 7/10. Feel like your BF isn't low enough to pull off U necks.

>>6728753
Very nicely done. This is happening.

>>6729666
i love it when little kids are put in sweaters

>>6729827
bin bags*

>>6729666
how old?

>>6729866
is who

>>6729816

thx po selector

>>6729436
sick fit mayne

>>6729879
you in that pic

>mfw /fa/ liked my fit today

>>6729994

Feels good not to get ripped to shreds by fuccboi dilletantes

>>6728729
Wat shoes

>>6729156
Not gunna lie i like it

>>6729994
>tfw /fa/ always hates your fit

>>6730161
1461s

>>6729813

Yeah... just shows off chest hair tho.

>>6729603

>>6730290
I need you to stay late, we have to catch the red dot.

>>6729761
just casually discussed it at the breakfast table

posting in a dying thread

>>6730514
nice leggings

>>6730514

manlet

>>6730514
Nice pieces. But the pants don't work.

>>6730514

sneakers look like shit. it's like your raw jawnz bled all over your shoes.

>>6730514
good fit, the only thing i don't like are the sneakers but it's w/e

>>6730535
>>6730527
quality posting

>>6730564
what would work better

>>6730581
pls be troll

>>6730514
none of those are cohesive

scoop neck on the sweater is too wide for shirt (not in a good way)

pants are not a good fit, exaggerates the curviness in your legs/knees too much and it makes your legs look stubby

the ann d's gradient doesnt work well with the color of pants being dark too, maybe if you had something to break up the color blocking so that it doesnt look like your pants rubbed off on your shoes

i do like most of it individually though but you need to coordinate better
nice cityapproval shirt

basic today.

>>6731208
why'd you even bother posting

>>6731227
but it is what i am wearing today.

>>6731245
there's no point in just posting a fit for the sake of posting a fit
we could criticize the fit of your shit or how you need to trim your nails or w/e but that's pretty much it because you're not really showing anything interesting to anyone
this is as bad if not worse than people just posting their pajamas

>>6730514
can you pleeeeeeeease stop standing like that jesus christ

>>6731404
jesus christ you're sperging out hard man. Look, I understand what you are saying, but honestly, this is /fa/ for fuck sake. Most of these guys can't do interesting fits, let alone look good in them. I would rather see a solid, basic fit than a shitty 'interesting' fit. If you can't understand this, then clearly you are in the wrong board.