/fa/ - Fashion

dnc i tried these on fit is shit
jacket is kinda cool tho

>levis

>>6687603
where did you buy your qasas?

>>6687618
I think your meant to get them tapered. That's what everyone has been saying.

>>6687603
looks ugly

>>6687618
looks ugly

cop or not?

Our Legacy parka in blue
Used to be 350 but this one currently on sale for 150 euro.

>>6687640
yikes

>>6687640

nopeee

>>6687632
the shit fit was thru the hips and crotch so...
besides
>bicycling in jeans

Cop?

>>6687640
looks good

>>6687618
>>6687632
Yeah, I'll probably be getting them tapered.
>>6687630
Jacksthreads of all places. Have them up for a little less than 400.
>>6687646
Not quite jeans I don't think. Material's all nice and techy

>>6687679
DNC

they're going for £11

should i cop?

>>6687686
... the taper isn't the problem with the fit. why does the internet menswear community have such a hard on for tapering jeans anyway?

regardless, they're poorly conceived. they didn't even gusset the crotch to displace the seams so you're going to have flat-felled seaming all up in your junk while you're trying to ride.

>2013
>not riding in shorts
sky's out thighs out get up with it

>>6687692
no, horrible

>>6687711
Well I personally love tapered jeans. I've been running for 6 years and boxing for 4, so I have pretty built yet slim-ish legs. So tapered fits look great for me and are the most comfortable.
I won't be wearing them for riding, so no arguments with you there.
My 4 pairs of chubbies are my one guilty pleasure.

>>6687717

ok

Yes or no?

>>6687764
You can find better shoes for the money you'd spend on those. Doc Martens are cool, but they should just stick to the boots imo

>>6687692

Does anyone know where to cop something similar to these but less shit?

>>6687739
>chubbies
2 long, go shorter

>>6687709
pls respond

>>6687783
http://www.sidmashburn.com/shop/footwear/dover-split-toe.html

>>6687787
get some taste, thats fucking disgusting

are you in highschool?

What is the verdict on april 77 colordrive for men?

I really love that skinny shit like the Horrors a uk band but whats the quailty of the denim like for that price?

It's difficult for me to find flats my size that aren't completely plain/ugly/$60+

It's difficult for me to find flats my size that aren't completely plain/ugly/$60+

>>6687794
is it? struggling to find a nice backpack that doesn't cost loads.
and no i'm not.

im not sure how versatile the color is.

>>6687811
YIKES

>>6687811
>being poor
those are completely ugly btw

you should stick to basic stuff for now if the maximum amount you can spend is $60

>>6687850
Not poor, just don't want to spend more than $40 for flats.

>>6687603
left jacket

>>6687872
then youre being cheap nigga

>>6687882
i stay noided

but not you fuccboi
>400 dollars
you will never pull it off either :^(
sadfrog.jpeg
dumb hick

I need some acorn/walnut leather shoes for the fall. I like these low heels and they don't seem too bad for $100. Anyone ever bought from Bed Stu?

http://shop.nordstrom.com/S/bed-stu-cosburn-oxford/3355939?origin=category&BaseUrl=Plain+Toe

>>6687897
maybe i can get matts mum to buy it for me somehow

>>6687882
That'd be beautiful if I didn't live in Florida

>>6687911
no. looks cheap as fuck

>>6687764

buy the doc martens tobias boot instead

>>6687963
Where can I get some mid-range stuff? I found these on ASOS for about the same price but they look (and are) pretty cheap

http://us.asos.com/ASOS-Shoes-in-Leather/10rl2g/?iid=2908382&cid=4209&Rf947=3574&Rf-200=10,26&Rf911=2244&sh=0&pge=1&pgesize=36&sort=-1&clr=Tan&r=1&mk=VOID&mporgp=L0FTT1MvQVNPUy1TaG9lcy1pbi1MZWF0aGVyL1Byb2Qv

>>6687884
It really is hard to find nice everyday flats in a size 9.5/10
I like the $60-$69 ones but it's hard to justfiy spending that much just for flats

>>6688035
dawg if its for everyday, you should be spending more

>>6688041
I'm fond of the $45, $62,$69 ones
Things falling apart aren't a concern to me. Even my shittest of quality things have lasted me at least 3 years. I'm more concerned about which style goes better with all of my dresses and skirts while being versitile

>>6688062
how the fuck would we know if its versatile if we havent even seen your outfits


but yo, all those are ugly

>>6688067
do u like anything? said no to everything in the the thread lol (not whoever u was responding to btw)

>>6688176
Then which ones do you like

>>6688219
the levis are pretty nice, the parkas nice, the db's are nice, i have 0 opinion on womens shoes but they look fine to me

>>6687911
I have these exact same shoes, not worth $100. I got mine for 60ish and am okay with them.

I'd rather not start my own thread and figure this is the best place to ask(?). Where can I get decent quality women skirts (think schoolgirl-ish)? Everything i see is sub-$40 so I think they're shit.

>>6688261
pleated or tartan or both?

>>6688261
shop bop

>>6688315
Both. As long as the quality is decent and not too expensive.

These on ebay. $480 and they've never been worn.
I wanna get these cause I dont like the look of the leather ones, but dont know if that'll mean less quality?
Really dont know if I should cop or not

>>6688337
>I don't like the look of the leather ones

well you should probably kill yourself so there is one less retard with poor taste

>>6688337

they're fake you mong

they're listed as >SS13

there were no black velcros for ss13

>>6688354
yes there were

>>6688348
Dry

>>6688334
bodyline has a pretty decent selection

>>6688359

show me

>>6688348
lel

i just dont think the leather black ones look good on outfits where u got nothing else leather on

>>6688354
aw shit for real? how is the dude reviewed so nicely if he sells fake shit

>>6688337
No, if you;re going to spend that much on something that could easily be fake, buy it from the actual store/with proof of authenticity/a reliable re-seller

>>6688354
they seller is legit

they sell from their store and put up a bunch of Rick Geos recently

>>6688375
http://www.ebay.com/itm/RAF-Simons-SS13-Footwear-Velcro-Sneaker-Boot-Black-UK7-10-/151051667463?pt=UK_Men_s_Shoes&var=&hash=item232b618807

would you consider this a reliable re-seller?

>>6688385
yes you fucking morons

you don't get a vat number as a fake seller

>>6688392
so why these dudes telling me to not to cop cuz its fake?

>>6688398
because this is /fa/

people have no clue what they are talking about

you should really get leather ones or not at all though - those aren't worth $500

As worn by based #gosling in Only God Forgives

Levis vintage clothing

>>6688409
I want velcros for their aesthetics and because its by Raf, not much concerned for how much the sneaker is actually worth (unless they got geo quality)
I really dont like the leather black ones, they look to shiny and would look weird in a dry outfit with simple black basics

>>6688428
you don't know what you are talking about

you aren't ready for purchases

>>6688386

show me the SS13 black velcros and we'll talk

alternately I could get these beat up leather ones (they look much better beat up) for 300 (which is a really good price)

they look a little bit fishy though, think they might be fake?

what u guys think?

>>6688410

DNC DNC DNC

>>6687945
tfw seeing inspo with layers
tfw south florida weather

i know that feel bro

>>6688436
teach me fashion master

>>6688443
Y

>>6688445

They don't look beat up at all

>>6688445
I thought the real ones had Raf Simons embossed on the side of the larger velcro strap

>>6687603

>>6688359

http://www.rafsimons.com/collections/ss-13/accessories.php

suck my dick

>>6688437
http://thebusinessfashion.co.uk/

if you think they aren't legit and have been scamming people for almost a decade maybe you should ask them how they did it

use your fucking head

>>6688535

show me the SS13 velcros

>>6688525
>>6688525
>>6688525
>>6688525

i'm not saying all of the seller's stuff is fake. he probably doesn't know that he's peddling fake shit. but those shoes are not in the collection. and look at the toebox. horrible glue/residue

>>6688035
The only decent ones are the 45 and 15 dollar ones. The rest are gawdy. If you want a show like that go for a simple, classical design.

>>6688543
I am not saying that the ebay ones are legit but Raf has recently released some black velcros, idk if they are from ss13 or fw13

http://www.ssense.com/men/product/raf_simons/black_leather_velcro_high-tops/78682

>>6688557

they are FW13.

http://www.rafsimons.com/collections/aw-13/accessories.php

so yes. they're fake. the dude insisting they're real is a fucking idiot

>because this is /fa/

>people have no clue what they are talking about

irony

>>6688461
gosling following is a passtime of gq readers and gq is a poor publication

>>6688565

yep. if they were legit, there would be the R logo on the heel pull tab

>>6687603
why are you wearing brown shoes with those pants. i do like the pants though

>>6688565
prove it

>>6688493
or these?

>>6688580

>>6688585
>>6688587
>>6688590
>>6688580

proof

>>6688587

>>6688595
yeah that looks pretty fucking horrible

>>6688595

yep. also no "raf simons" stamped on the strap.

>>6688605

>>6688605
not all of them got that tho

u telling me this one is fake too?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Raf-Simons-Black-Leather-High-Tech-Fabric-Velcro-Strap-Sneakers-Size-EU-42-/130967074976?pt=US_Men_s_Shoes&hash=item1e7e3ef8a0

>>6688605
non leather versions don't always have it

see: the pair you owned in black/white gradient

>>6688613
>http://www.ebay.com/itm/Raf-Simons-Black-Leather-High-Tech-Fabric-Velcro-Strap-Sneakers-Size-EU-42-/130967074976?pt=US_Men_s_Shoes&hash=item1e7e3ef8a0

no but those have the "R" on the heel pull tab see this pic.

>>6688627

that is also true, but this guy didnt post any pics of the box with the bar code/item number, or the inside of the shoe where the size is stamped, so you cant really be 100% sure.

unless i see the original box with barcode/size/item number etc, i would assume theyre fake.

>>6688643
bro we already know the nonleather ones are fake, doesnt have anything to do with raf simons not being stamped on the strap

>>6688654

well the branding is one way to tell whether a garment/shoe is fake or legit, there are multiple things you can check...

What's the fit like on the commuters?
it doesn't say whether they're 511 513 or anything and I can't find information on measurements.

>>6688662
okay thanks man

u think i should cop the real beat up leather ones?

>>6687830
goes with indigo denim and black...

>>6688684

haha fan

Alpha Industries MA-1 Reissued
Eastpak
Kouros Body by YSL

>>6688668

if you like them, personally im not a van of the canvas versions but if you like how they look go for it.

>>6688659

i think commuters only come in 511. And they're a size big or so cuz they're vanity-sized

Digging this pilot jacket from H&M, should I cop? If not does anyone have any better rec?

>>6688735
no

>>6688741
but y?

>>6688735
is that polyester? i hate the feel of polyester

>>6688684
will they be too big if i dont size 1 down?

>>6688747
it doesnt look good bro, thats one thing

the real reason why u shouldnt buy it tho is that it is hm

shit quality
ull meet fuccbois who wear the same thing as u
ugly

dont buy hm bro dont even consider it trust me itll give u more life quality if u just ignore its existance

this goes for asos and shit like that too unless ure homeless and need basics

>>6688757
I don't really know any alternatives

>>6688762
hmm ure a new one then

honestly just go ahead and buy hm and asos cheap stuff and like develop your style from there

hopefully if u lurk more here and are actually interested in fashion ull develop away from it anyway

>>6688777
ehhhh idk I'll just lurk more, the last thing I want to do is spend my money on things that'll break or I'll hate in the long run.

>>6688785
like if u buy a tshirt from hm expect it to fall apart in a few months

i bought a tshirt from there and the fit was nice and it looked fine and all, I wore it like once ever 2-3 weeks and it just fell apart after like 3 months

>>6688797
Really? My t-shirts from hm lasts forever, the black ones are fading a bit now after a year or so, might just pick up a few new ones.
Only thing I buy from hm.

>>6688586
these.

the chunkier sole looks good. and all around a more interesting shoe.

>>6689265
Closely inspect the image because i once bought a sweatshirt from Only NY and the bottom folded up and it was really baggy.
Make sure you don't buy garbage everything else looks good.
I don't know how any of those except cps look irl.

i already got these but idk if i messed up on the colorway. seems a bit plain but maybe that's okay?

http://www.karmaloop.com/product/The-Barber-Shop-Wallet/338298

>>6689309
Trainers look so ugly.
Not because the design but the way they fit
Idk maybe you can make it work.

>>6689265
what is 3? the cut looks cool

>>6689324
are they better than any other colorway nike has?? like is it a decent color

>>6689331

http://www.hm.com/us/product/14654?article=14654-A

>>6689339
I mean black and white is pretty versatile.
Before you buy colored items just think about what in your wardrobe does it fit.
I've fucked up and bought suede gray shoes and i have only worn them once.
I mean black,white,black and white can go with a lot of stuff but the trainers themselves don't look great.
They try to make the shoes comfortable so they bend in at the bottom and makes the silhouette look p.bad

>>6689355
eh free's are hyped from where i live. most people are really physical and hardly wear anything dressy. but thanks alot!

I know you niggas hate on karma loop, but the jacket has minimal branding and a nice military look
>tfw you know the colour will be pale irl
cop?

>>6688633

The "R" should look like this.

Uniqlo chino shorts.

All I really want is something solid color and cheap.

>>6689320
anyone?

>>6689403
nah
dont cop

>>6687830
w2c?

>>6689382
any feedback?

>>6689398
I'm wearing those right now, they're comfy and the length is great. Not amazing quality, but it is pretty cheap so, you get what you pay for.

c-cop or not

>>6689459

#yay

finna cop, thanks.

>>6689265
w2c 2?

>>6689462
sure dawg. even if /fa/ hates it, most people think herschel bags are great.

>>6688322
Dear god half of that shit is too much for one skirt.

I need some cheap shoes for walking around campus, I'm unsure if classic white vans will go well with my raw denim, but I've seen them pulled off well. Cop or not?

>>6689652
feel like there's better colorways to go with than pure white

>>6688691
pls respond

>>6689578
it's an ASOS MA1 Bomber

>>6689652
Yes. The white/white colorway looks so good worn in

>>6689462
Hershel quality is shit. Go with Everlane.

>>6689398
I own 3 pairs. They're pretty solid. Cop them

>>6689382
It looks alright but it also looks enormous on the model, so size down

Don't know whether to cop this New Balance colorway or customize q pair.

>>6689880
Or this pair I made on the site. I do like that they're made in America.

>>6689884
this one

>>6688691

yes

yes

don't buy cologne unless you've smelled it

>>6689897
>>6689884
What about this pair?

>>6689931
Yeah I like the white "N" better

>>6689931
get rid of the red accents

>>6689972
Why? I disagree with this anti-red sentiment going through /fa/ right now.

>>6689931
Opposite color scheme. What do yall think?

>>6690002
what do you mean why? It just doesn't look good

>>6689382
I don't like how that little section on the left sleeve is a different color from the rest of the jacket, as well as the bottom left corner

>>6690002
>Why? I disagree with this anti-red sentiment going through /fa/ right now.
>>>/trailoftears/

>>6690146
>Stop liking what I don't like.

>>6690002
3 colors is too busy

Dunno about this

Gonna be a dick and post more colorways. Dat black sole.

>>6689931
>>6689884
>>6689880
>>6690096
>New Balance
>/fa/
pick one

>>6690257
One more.

Can someone tell me where to cop a jacket like this?

>>6690282
its called a bomber jacket

>>6690352
I know, but I was wondering if anyone knew of any decent ones for sale.

>>6690344
pls
I think no, but I'm not sure

>>6690970
>>6690344
looks p gross imo

>>6690282
commoners alike

y/n? $129 from General Pants. Reversible black/white satin