/fa/ - Fashion

>I don't have anything but I remeber that one pic of the guy standing in the street with the mouthcover and the cargo pants with the shitton of pokets, anyone got that.

This one?

>>6641840
Yeah thanks man

Btw just to clarify what I mean with Techwear/Riotcore:

I'm looking for outfits that are more on the bulky side and look practical. But they also have to look combat worthy, not as clinical as pure techwear. I'm talking more rough textures and Materials.

Riotcore/Techwear aka North Face jackets.

>>6641840
who dem pants?

from sufu waywt

Already some good discussion in >>6641797.

Going to repeat wondering this:

>Any suggestions on a reversible hoody, preferably a thin windbreaker type thing but whatever?

Also preferably on the cheaper side.

>>6641840
wtc those boots

Are riot police /fa/?

>>6641856
fuckin love that video

>>6643251
I am also interested

Acronym has some pretty dope stuff.

http://www.acronym.de/

>>6644254
man, i am not a bad enough dude.

Aitor Throup also does cool stuff.

>>6644276
are those masks even available for purchase?

>>6644290
I don' think so, not yet anyway. Some of the pants he designs are really cool though.

>>6641840
>>6643251
w2c pants or alternatively any ideas for similar looking ones?

>>6644323
Buy levis commuter cargos then get them tapered below the knee.

>>6644330
Don't think they come in green.

>>6644326
any articles or videos about what's happening in this pic?

>>6644438
Looks like someone floored a riot cop in Russia.

>>6643265
laughing man core

techwear is the dumbest trend

you're not a hiker
you're not an explorer
you are a hungry skeleton pasty teen

>>6644564
cool

>>6644564
it still has tons of practical uses for everyday urban environments
>warm
>protection from weather
>pockets for book, sandwich, and passport

also it's not a trend

>>6644574
Also it just looks cool. This is a fashion board after all.

>>6644564
Bro do are your Garments even engineered with Gore-Tex? I though not.

>>6644564
You're saying this as if techwear was useless in an urban environment.

>>6644574
autism
it is a trend
>>6644577
faggot

>>6644564

>>6644585
Enjoy getting wet faggot.

>>6644585
So, now, autism consists in seeking a combination of comfort, practicality and good looks?

>>6644589
autism
>>6644596
autism
>>6644605
autism

>>6644623
Please leave.

>>6644623

>>6644749

>>6644751

>>6644756

>>6644759
oblig

>>6644761

>>6644767

>>6644775

>>6644786

>>6644767
>those unfitting boots and badly tied laces
these guys are gonna have mean fucking blisters.

>>6644789

>>6644793

>>6644799

>>6644800

>>6644803

>>6644808

>>6644812

>>6644817
annnnnd im done.

Shit that reminds me of what I wear in the winter.
>combat pants
>combat boots
>korea war trenchcoat over hoodie
>big-ass scarf
>aviator goggles
Or am I more hoboninja?

>>6641856
i love this video and that song is fantastic
sick
>>6644799
this will undoubtedly go down as one of the more important photos in the music industry. it's amazing

hood+scarf+gloves do not a style make

>>6644547

>>6645237

>>6645238

I love this style, I was actually thinking of mixing it with another style I found from this arab country.

>>6645238
sauce w2c, etc.

>>6641840
w2c the pants
dope af

>>6645397
Acronym

>>6645412
Also very interested.

Does anyone know where i can get some tech-ish pants, that dont look like pleb cargos? (non-pleb cargos are ok) for under $150

I'll add some stuff to this

>>6646220
Jacket turns into a backpack when you don't want to wear it.

>>6646224

>>6646229

>>6646234

>>6646244

>>6646204
plz

>>6644564

>>6644756
smooth mother

>>6646204
anyone?

Obligatory

>>6644203
#nxtlvl as fuark

Any one know where I can get a slim bomber jacket?

bump

>>6649231
These look so nice, can't justify the price though...

>>6649251
Yes you can, they're well made.

So what do you guys do with all of this stuff?
You're climbers, hikers or like rafters?

>>6649270
You have a pair?

>>6649479

>being this new

/fa/ spends hundreds on jap Nike gear for runners....even though they (/fa/) don't run

>>6649529
It's the first time I've seen this fad.
Why do you guys buy stuff designed for certain activities when you could buy stuff that was designed to look like the real practical stuff for 1/10th the price?

>>6649548

because #hype

>>6649548

>>6649568
No it isn't.

>>6649556

>>6649548
Because Post-Modernism.

>>6649529

>>6649568

>implying I was trolling

Nothing look stupider* than a fucking pudgy, out of shape twat in full gyakusou #omgsuchexoticism gear even

>>6649578
>>6649574
>>6649568
Are you meta baiting by posting bait images?
Sneaky motherfucker.

>>6649588

Any one know of a good tech jacket for winter?

I don't like my jackets to be too big and bulky.. I like jackets that are slim but keep you warm.

>>6641840
Anyone know w2c pants or similar?
>inb4 commuter cargos

>>6644564
They obviously do it for the look you idiot

Though as a fashion statement I think it's pretty autistic.But who knows, I could change my tune in a few years

>>6649231
They're based in the city I live
If I actually liked techwear I'd absolutely consider robbing them
>inb4 I wind up with a crossbow in my neck

>>6649270
austism

>>6644808
>Techwear vs Gothninja

>>6644564
>>6649548

Besides >>6649577, which is valid?

Well, I'm starting to get into climbing, but cheapo athletic wear can do fine for that. Practically, it's much more about the sort of things you encounter as a human just doing stuff.

My entry into all this was travelling rough out of a single backpack during a winter. Of course, everything had to be oriented towards not smelling or looking like a bum while also not dying.

But it's also of basic use in any sort of urban living; it's almost a revelation when you have clothes designed to work with what you do instead of just rando cotton shit. I don't know the origin myth of Acronym or Undercover or anyone like that, but virtually every company making more accessible techwear is either an outdoor clothing company, or was started by a bunch of frustrated cyclists in a major city. (Outlier, Proof NYC, Mission Workshop, Chrome, etc.)

Think about it: getting around a city by bike (easily the best way) means you have to deal with inclement weather from both directions: on top of spending, say, thirty minutes before and after work sitting in the rain, and in the hot or the cold, you're generating a ton of heat and sweat. You don't want to smell like that sweat when you get to work or the party or your date. If it's cool out, you don't want it clamming up against your skin. If it's cold out, you don't want it giving you hypothermia when you stop moving. Wearing normal pants means you have to replace them much more often. Normal shirts will often bunch up if you ride forward and low, like a lot of people do.

>>6650129

Even if you don't cycle, accounting for all this stuff will just give you a much better time of things. You have to do laundry less. You never worry about if your notebook, phone, computer, etc. are going to get ruined in the rain. Just physically *moving* is easier. Everything becomes clearer and more direct.

That last bit is getting into a certain aesthetic satisfaction. There's a huge conceptual and tactile difference between cosplaying in cotton distressed by the hands of dead Bangladeshis and wearing something you know is designed, engineered, and manufactured with thorough care to be the real deal and actually do something. And the thing it's designed to do is help you live your life and do stuff yourself.

Plus, you look like the badass you may become if you do the right stuff, and not like some douche who decided to buy an H&M M65 knockoff.

>>6646204
Look at outdoor brands. Pic related is a pair of Patagonia pants intended for climbing, nylon-elastene, $79.

Uniqlo doesn't have many pants that are tech beyond just being poly athletic shorts, but their aesthetic is very compatible with tech. The only cargos you might see more in 'net tech fit pics than the Levis Commuters (one option for you) are the Uniqlo ones, and a lot of their stuff is produced with an elastic waistband, the directness and simplicity of which lines up with it well, I think. The only pair I own are a pair of elastic-and-built-in-nylon-belt cords, which are okay quality but have a nice cut.

If you're not concerned with *looking* tech-y, certainly in winter you can throw whatever thermals you want under whatever pants you want.

You can also always look used.

>>6650141
Oh, and also looking at traditional workwear companies can be useful.

Most of the stuff will be cut for a high fructose corn syrup fed typical Midwestern plumber (I forget who, but someone's ad copy explicitly noted once that their pants were cut to not show your ass crack!) and it'll largely be boring, clammy cotton, but good stuff is out there.

My first place to check would be Duluth Trading Company. AFAIK, every last pant they make comes with a gusset, and some of them have good detailing. Shorts are obviously much more adaptable, since a looser fit is more workable there.

>riotcore

stop making up new fuckin terms everyday

>>6646244
What is this called, being able to strap a jacket to your back like that?

>>6644564
> Why would you wear a bomber jacket? You're not a fighter pilot.
> Why would you wear sneakers when you're not running?
Why are you on this board?

>>6644254
>those prices
Fuck that, if it was a sane price I would buy.

w2c pic related? It's Final Home obviously, but I can't find it for sale anywhere.

>>6644203
>are police /fa/

ACAB, come on, man.