/fa/ - Fashion

Thank you based anon

>concepts and culture aren't relevant to /fa/

Stay pleb, anon. But still, bump.

this page is useful if you folks arent aware of it

http://dressed-down.com/blog/2013/5/13/intro-to-techwear-part-1-the-bas

do you have to be ottermode to successfully pull off techwear

>>6488901
>>>6488836

>>6488908
skinny will do, but since youre asking youre probably fat.

>>6488918
hello friend

>>6488908
Skinny/[various names for various degrees of /fit/] always helps, but no.

Someone post that pic of that guy smoking the cigar.

>>6488908
yeha pretty much

Contributing because I want this thread to actually be useful. Found these the other day and thought they were interesting (especially for dat der price)

http://www.zappos.com/steve-madden-grekko-blue-multi?utm_source=shopstyle&zfcTest=fcl%3A1

>>6488901
>>6488901
This looks pretty cool, can you actually find this in shops, or only on the webs?

>>6489010

lets get tech wit it

>>6489033

i mean like super techy guys

>>6489032
what do you mean in particular

>>6489039

2tech4me

>>6489055

>>6489059

>>6489057

how tech do u guys wanna go ??

>>6489063

like rly tech ?

>>6489059

More tactical than tech but still a great look. I love this high-vis triangle.

>>6489069

or just kinda tech ???

>>6489041
I mean stuff like this >>6489033
and file.

>>6489078

i can do as tech as u guys want ;)

>>6489084

or just do like diet tech (1cal tech) so let me know ??? : )

>>6489082
that nike hoodie you can probably find in stores
i've seen people mentioning they see acronym and gyakusou and whatever in stores but i guess it depends heavily on where you live
have a look at stockists on the sites of some brands you like the look of see if any are near you

>>6489082

heres the jacket u wanted also follow my blog ;))))

http://miscerstyle.tumblr.com/post/55181492550/nike-stadium-full-zip-jacket-50-additional

>>6489091
For some reason I really love this picture
>TFW no QT girl to go running with you on those cold, clear winter nights
WHY /FA/, WHY?

>>6489398
Because you're not doing anything about it, and are instead crying because the things you want don't magically fall in your lap?

Cry more bitch nigga, go back to /fit/. /r9k/ is good too

>>6488925
Got you dog, not really tech wear, but he is big

>>6489425
dat sheer shirt is a no no for him

>>6489425
he makes me feel so bad i wish he wasnt in the picture so i wouldn't have to feel second hand feels for him

>>6489063
Those shoes look really cool

what are techwear sunglasses?

>>6489581

Boris.

>>6489581

Mykita x Bernhard

>>6489581

Margiela

what are some good reasonably priced hardshells?

>>6489581

Outside of Oakley's sport performance styles, most people who use "techy" finishes on eyewear (like hydrophobic lenses and whatnot) tend to style them more traditionally so they're super functional but don't look it.

>>6489612
im definately thinking oakleys i hated them before today but i just realized how dope they can be

>>6489603
Thanks for tipping me off to this. These (Daisuke) might be the most techwear fashion sunglasses out there.

It's a fucking riot visor.

can someone describe techwear to me

guessing it involves efficiency and modular pieces

>>6489841
Looks uncomfortable as hell

>>6491344
Technologically advanced clothing

Look up Arc'teryx Veilance to get a good idea

>>6491374
hmm looks pretty standard

anything else

As someone who has grown up backpacking, rock climbing, and kayaking this trend is really funny to me. A lot of this stuff reminds me of stuff I use, which is obviously the point but still.

>>6491501
yeah a lot of this tech stuff looks like my snowboarding gear.

I'm looking for a breathable rain jacket for biking. Any suggestions?

>>6488388
>you will never be as cool as MC ride

>>6491367
you'll be uncomfortable when you get a brick in your unprotected eye not wearing them during a spontaneous riot

>>6491367
let's see whose uncomfortable after they sand in their eyes while ATV'ing in the desert

>>6491501

This is why I love it so much. goof ninja is meh, but tech ninja HNGGGG.

>>6489033
Sauce?

>>6492085
he linked already follow the posts

>>6492088
I'm looking for a link to purchase from. Google didn't turn up any vendors

>>6492104
he gave a link for it i told you

>>6489063
>>6489069

w2c pls

should i get obsidian or nigger black?

bump

>>6489063
shiiiiiiet i need an ID on these nikees
w3c

>>6492305
is your google broken i dont get it

>>6492213
I have the same problem but black only comes in a small which wouldn't work for me because I have big broad shoulders.

>>6492355
Me too. Didn't notice that there wasn't any other sizes besides that. I'm 5'11 @ 200 pounds so I guess large is the only thing that'll work

>>6492351
I use bing, but I prefer to ask someone who might know off the top of their head.

>>6492375
he means the google reverse image search

you can activate it in the 4chan settings so a little [G] will pop up every time you log on to 4chan. Pressing this [G] directs you to google's image search engine and often gives you accurate results

>>6489609
Marmot is solid for the price

i finally have a job to afford this shit (investment analyst). i would get fired if i ever wore it to work. :(

if the front of your face isn't covered by the neck piece you ain't shit.

>>6489409
Actually no, it's because I live in the tropics, so winter running is the exact same as summer running.

fuck oakley actually has some cool stuff

>>6494666

Tips for summer techwear? It's too hot in california for all that outerwear. I've got my eye on a few backpacks, have a pair of hot weather boots. Any other essentials?

>>6489010
these shoes aren't especially durable or useful in any way, and they look bad to boot.

try again.

Recommendations for a messenger/courier <$200?
Waterproof, hold a 12.5 in laptop, preferably not timbuktu.
Just wanted something to use other than my Osprey, preferably black.

>>6494708
Fjallraven vintage briefcase

>>6494728
>Fjallraven vintage briefcase
looks nice, is it waterproof?
Also doesn't seem so...techwearish

>>6494745
Had no idea I posted this rec in a tech wear thread just saw your question on front page. It's pretty waterproof, I've never gotten my shit wet into the rain. Although I haven't tested it in a torrential downpour because I'm a which and will melt in the water

>>6494761
haha its all good, it is a nice looking bag.

BAMP

Bump.

>>6492374
I'm that exact height and weight man... Scary shit right there

>>6494680
Same problem as him...

Can I pair gym shorts with tech wear or is that pleb?

What's everyone's opinion on appropriate footwear?
I know black leather boots work, especially ones with flat black rubber soles. I think the sole is really where the line is crossed between military utility and urban tech utility.
I'm not saying more classic boot soles are barred from tech outfits, but they do shift the entire look, sometimes throwing it off balance where the outfit seems border tech looking more like a modern gothic military than light weight agile comfortable and urban by wearing a sole that is built less for comfort and more for durability. is it just safe to say tech can branch into both urban and feral environments?
here is my idea of a perfect tech boot. (urban)
I have a few other images I'll dump too. let me know what you think.

>>6497638
and a great sneaker, cup again, but cp does minimal, and though minimal isn't a necessity when it comes to shoes, it certainly doesn't work against the outfit.
these aren't black mids, they're a little green or brown. black is fine too.

>>6497647
and then these. flat sole gone now, but black suede?
is suede barred from tech for being one of the hardest materials to maintain?
8in that case, what about waxed suede?

>>6497655
now for something even more questionable.
a sneaker that almost looks like the offspring of some super polished oxfords and a pair of converse.
is this too refined, would the shine ruin the effect?
mind you patent leather is very robust aside from its especially vulnerable manicured aesthetic.

>>6497663
>>6497655
>>6497647
>>6497638
why can't you just dump the fucking pictures

why do you have to add a natalie portman commentary to everything

>>6497672
because I want to drum up some responses, opinions, feedback

do t hold you're breath, here's some more lengthily opinionated mfa-tier rambling.
here's a piece from Nike I can't believe no one shines any light on, anywhere. they're also incredibly cheap. they move away from minimalism and light, possibly over designed and a bit ostentatious with the gold swoosh, but not completely tasteless. these shoes remind me of tanks, weight, power. if that can be manifested in the rest of the outfit it'd achieve a pretty unique look. I can't see it happening but its worth a mention.

these sell for nothing all over eBay, $40-70

>>6497710
here's possibly the easiest pair to put on. I guess they're boots. nothing special about them but nothing really wrong with them either.

>>6497638
I would absolutely love those if it weren't for the sole

>>6497723
maybe this is too street to be tech, but the foamposit's metallic element is anything but classic. I'm not sure if these could fit into a tech outfit, metallics seem reserved for future/space tech which as a style has tech elements, doesn't aim to provide the same real utility that urban tech does.

>>6497730 what about this then? I think its waxed suede, completely different I guess.

>>6497746
I dunno, I like the shine of the leather on the others and I like to watch the leather get worn on nice boots like that, but I really like having an arch in the sole or at least a wooden sole. Rubber gets worn too fast for me.

roshe run is tech wear right?

can I get fit pics of black/sail roshe run with shorts?

they look awkward whenever I wear whem with shorts

I love the idea of techwear because I have a boner for expensive outdoor clothing and cyberpunk. I have no idea how to make it stylish and less "costume" though.

There is no such thing as techwear. This is just a stupid /fa/ term for any raincoat or backpack designed after 1987.

So, you know, the same ordinary shit that 90% of the population of Vancouver wears on a daily basis.

>>6500243
Get a load of this guy

>>6500243
truth.

I was blown away when I saw people on here acting like arc'teryx was something special or hip or fashionable.


Maybe where *you* come from it's exotic and cool and high tech... but over here it's just another jacket.

>>6500301
I live in Canada and still think Arc'teryx Veilance pieces are actually quite nice, but dat price.

These are beautiful, I just wish they weren't built for -30 degree weather. Maybe I should move to Alaska.

>>6499885
Wear clothes that are weather appropriate.
Don't wear rollerblades or katanas
it's not too hard.

W2C nice (military looking) outdoor boots suitable for trekking/hiking inna woods?

please help
please respond

>>6500474
I once saw someone wearing mickey mouse boots for work in a 90 degree Pennsylvania summer. I have no idea why.

>>6500554
He has more dedication than me. Maybe he enjoyed having a swimming pool in each shoe.

>>6497647
these are my dream shoes
w2c?

>>6497672

yo shut the fuck up retard, discussion is the goddamn purpose of the board and it's not even like you have to read it. just kill yourself.

>>6497710

I think they're disgusting looking. I don't get tech vibes, I just think they're juvenile and a huge mess.

>>6497638

these are really pretty of course, but I prefer the militant urban thing anyway.

should I get a lighterweight jacket and layer in the winter or should I get a heavier one so I can wear T-Shirts?

>>6500496
>Don't wear rollerblades or katanas

Sure destroy all my dreams

so techwear is just gothninja inspired North Face college apparel?

>>6501823
Pretty much

>>6501823
top lel indeed

>>6501823
do you consider anything all black "gothninja inspired"????

>>6501976
pull up your pants.

>>6501984

fuck you this is like 2006 era OG 5th dimension sufu ass shit you get your herby ass outta here

>>6501984
go away, you plankton

>>6501984
no mom

>>6502003
>>6502024

What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I’m the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You’re fucking dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that’s just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little shit. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little “clever” comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You’re fucking dead, kiddo.

>>6497443
prob depends

>>6502036
epic simply epic!

>>6502074
Thanks.

Bump.

would this work as a techwear layer?
http://www.oki-ni.com/tops/thom-krom-mens-cotton-cowl-neck-hooded-sweat-tho1802blk.html

>>6504546
Too retarded looking.

>>6502003
>herby

what could it mean

Is my backpack techwear?

>>6504618
Looks like some sort of sea creature

>>6504798

Is that good or bad?

ITT
>plens

>>6504856
>implying that game wasn't /fa/ as fuck

>>6504546
Also cotton kinda negates the point of techwear

>>6504921
true.
Any recs for a tech hoodie?

>>6505380
Patagonia R1

>>6505393
>Patagonia R1
thanks

idk if this thing is too small, feels a bit constrictive when I bring my elbows forward

what does /fa/ think?

>>6505954
i think that you have cum stains on your mirror
gross

>>6505987

toothpaste

seriously though I need to decide whether to return it

>>6505954
Looks fine to me. Could probably size up though if you can exchange it easily.

>>6506044

>exchange it easily

Probably not unfortunately. Got it for half retail on ebay so unless the buyer agrees to an exchange it'll just be a regular return. But I don't think it'll work if I put on a sweater or something underneath.

Is techwear only for winter?

>>6506130
no.

>>6506130

Many high-performance fabrics are both insulated as well as ventilated and designed for year-round wear.

>>6506144
>>6506148
any summer examples of techwear

>>6488388
MC Ride is so cool he can pull off fingerless gloves

>>6506167
just don't wear a jacket

these pants look fucking awesome but $200 is a lot even so

http://shop.outlier.cc/shop/retail/slim-dungarees.html

plus they got a special cut for trexfags

what do?

Im inspired by a lot of techwear lately, here is a fit with a taped seams jacket. Really comfy!

>>6506338
Why do you feel the need to trip

what about these?

>>6506338
i like it. just fix that gay pose

>>6506352
shit forgot image

>>6506338
jacket looks kinda awkward but it might just be how you're standing

>>6506350
People steal my identity and post my glorious fits

Poet, can you rec me a jacket? Poorfag losing weight so I'm trying to keep it around $150~175?
I love the super dry wind cheaters, but got bitched at for it.

>>6501976
is that backpack a UC scab? i never noticed it before, but it looks that way

>>6506358
or these

>>6506440
Not poet, but what are you looking to be using the jacket for?

>>6506560
Outerlayer. Fall/early winter, maybe late winter with layers.
Would prefer it to be a windbreaker/waterproof if possible.

>>6506440
why are you asking poet
he has things to do too

>>6506712
Poets one of the best posters on /fa/

I've forgotten the name of a brand that makes tech wear, someone please remind me. I think what they make is mostly made for sailing, they have a special line with all black stuff and the logo for that is a black sailboat on a black background. I may have mixed some of these things up.

I browsed their webshop a few weeks ago but I forgot to bookmark it.

>>6506731

and u can't check your history?

>>6506735
nah it's too long ago

>>6506731

Musto?

>>6506750
yeaaah that's it
it was their black yacht collection I was thinking of
cheers

>>6506757

I have their sailing gear, if the fit of their other collections is anything similar it will be wide, very wide.

>>6506750
not the guy asking, but I was wondering too, thanks!

>>6506750

shit do they not ship to the US?

>>6506778

This, Musto is god tier sailing wear but the fit is a bit off.

This is me, look at how wide that jacket is.

>>6506778
>>6506798
I think I might go have a look in one of their London stores at some point rather than ordering anything but that's still good to know, so cheers for that extra info

>>6506440
anyone?

bump

for everyone interested -- a pair of OG helmut flight pants (w/ oxygen tube!!!) just went up on the denmark ebay. unfortch they're sz 52

http://www.ebay.de/itm/Helmut-Lang-Bondage-Pants-SZ-52-/190870428055

>>6506475
not even close

>>6505954
looks like an autist

bump

>>6506798
have you tried pulling in the drawstrings or something

bretty cool cargos

http://www.autographmenswear.com/trousers-c17/julius-7-banana-fit-trouser-p11576

>>6511811
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU-
I shouldn't be browsing here without my 1k reserve fully ready to go. At least there will always be next season.

>>6511830
i had a feeling youd love these

>>6511860
My left eyelid is twitching, that's how much I'm sweating those. Always a new cop, always a new grail...

>>6491516
Same here, except I ride high vis colors in case of avalanches. Guess my Recco jackets are fa as fuck nowadays

>>6511868
You don't have to break the bank.

http://global.rakuten.com/en/store/gsc-rinkan/item/r05mp1306221016500/

http://global.rakuten.com/en/store/gsc-rinkan/item/r01mp1306210738000/

http://global.rakuten.com/en/store/gsc-rinkan/item/r01mp1306210738000/

http://global.rakuten.com/en/store/anchor-mind/item/397pam14/

>>6511901
Oh man, looks like I have a savior today!
Can you tell me anything about sizing? I'm usually a 29x34, 30x34. What size should I go for?

>>6511909
Not exactly sure, you can find measurements at the bottom of the page though.

Also prepare for atleast +60% in shipping & VAT. Still, reasonable.

>>6511919
Thanks again, brother! Looks like I missed the obvious.

>>6511811

>>6511951
LOL. i knew you were going to catch that

lately i am just really digging outlier

>>6489010
i feel urban cop boots with the noslip surface would be the most techy

also digging this hyperlite backpack
>waterproof, 10x stronger than steel, weighs .35lb, packs into a pocket

>>6512598
ffffffff

>>6512574
this dude looks like he's about to go full kwisatz haderach

imo leather is better urban material because synthetic still kind of absorbs dirt and grime plus it absorbs oils a lot. leather repels EVERYTHING tho its less flexible

>>6497663
mm yeah i like those patent leather sneakers.

>>6511901
I might need to go to this site more often...

>>6497638
also they have different advantages. these are better in some ways because you can clean the sole easily, but for outdoorsy urban wear id wear some cop tactical boots and just switch to regular ol' dress shoes indoors

>>6494666
i was thinking of getting some wraparound mirrored Poker Shades --- they have some UV and glare protection but are basically clear on the inside but mirrored to the outside.

>>6488291
this gril is such a qt3.14

bump

>>6512712
honestly mannn

>>6499515
>>6499516
>>6499520
More tech please.

>>6512600
I have the really similar smaller brother, the grey $95 one. It's a perfect daypack, except for lacking an external bottle pouch.

I'd sew one on if I had any clue about how the material would react.

>>6506338
That fucking raccoon.

>>6514828
didn't even see it!

>>6514828
>>6514831
hahahah what the shit

>>6512616
lel

he makes that poncho look next lvl as fuk.

>>6497443
5.11 Tactical shorts + Under the knee socks

>>6506798
Do you actually want to go out in public like this?

>lel hazardous waste team style

>>6512574
>>6512616
>make product specifically designed for the purpose of offering sun protection
>showcase it with a night shoot on the beach with someone too dark to sunburn, or show up well against the inky night past the flash

Only fucking Outlier. I love their stuff, but their photography is just always so ridiculous and tone-deaf.

>>6515761
Seriously, this shit is like if you set Race Bannon as living in Brooklyn, with no villains or motivation other than jumping over shit, and only rarely leaving the Metro North/LIRR area to go to some anonymous desert to go-kart and jump over rocks.

(Calling samefag on myself, to be clear.)

>>6514828
hahaha what the fuck

:s

>>6506338
m8 ur coon

>>6515785
Why is that man falling into a taxi

>>6517197
That's the point. Their photos are ridiculous.

This is meant to show off a fucking blazer.

>106-OUTLIER-UltralightBlazer-OhSnap.jpg

xd

>>6511203

You'll look like a balloon.

>>6515354

When I'm sailing on rough seas, yes.

>>6520272
agree 100%, outlier's photography is the "active lifestyle" equivalent of goth kids wearing swooshie capes standing around in a graveyard looking spooky

sometimes i throw on my beach parka and just hover silently, like a ghost

>mfw just ordered a Shadow Project jacket from End with 40% discount

>>6506440

North Face is your best bet at that price range

would docs be tech?

For under the jacket it, is it just t-shirts and stuff?
Was thinking of copping a Uniqlo airism for a base layer.

>>6521517
hahahaha

>>6521472
Don't really see anything in their line up around that price that I like

thump

What does everyone think about how Uniqlo is trying to angle towards techwear?

More "Blegh, it's fast fashion, pig disgusting, slave labor, shit quality?" or "Oooh oooh imma cop college kid Gyakusou tfw broke!"

>>6524590
dont buy cheap tech, because there wont be any tech in it

>>6524597
Tell that to every sportswear or outdoor company ever.

Tech, to an extent, is cheap. Want a t-shirt to be tech? Raglan construction, flatlock stitching, poly or poly-blend, and if you want, you're done. You have everybody's cheap running shirt.

Want a pair of technical pants? Any outdoor or military brand will sell you a pair of ripstop pants in their flavor for under $50.

You can do that well or poorly, you can improve on it a huge number of ways, but it's tech and it's cheap.

>>6524909
He has a point,otter wax surplus cargo's, taper them and you have a poor mans julius

Oh God look at this colorway.

>>6524944

Doing stuff like that is a little more complicated; you have to watch the detailing a lot, be very careful with piece selection. But absolutely.

>>6488291
WHO IS THIS GIRL

>>6525220
Google's girlfriend, image search.

>>6525249
doesn't say her name

>tfw arc'teryx veilance actuator was on sale at mrporter for ~$150
fuck

any idea where I can get the Levi's Commuter Cargo Pants in the UK? they only do them in a tan colour.

was planning to wear them as shorts like pic related

>>6525279
Does if you bother click open a few tabs.

http://onandbeyond.com/2012/03/arcteryx-veilance-ss12-penelope/#comments

>>6506003
fit looks niice. Decide if your comfy with it and go with it.

>>6506003
wtf is wrong with your hair

>>6525413

Competitive Cyclist has a bunch of sizes in stock, $40 world shipping. Pic unrelated.

>>6525459
well holy shit, thank you friend

can't work out if the ones in my photo are the shorts or pants though, pretty sure they're the pants because they're rolled up though right?

>>6525459
gtfo poet clone

>>6525471
I have the black pair, yea they're pants.

>>6525484
would you reccomend then? it's summer in the uk so i'd be rolling them up? comfy? slim fit?

>>6525482

Just trying to offer some useful advice sorry for rustling your feathers anon ol' buddy :)

Maybe take a look at this dog and do some deep breathing

>>6525496
I'm a larger guy, but they fit pretty slim.
Find them comfy af too after you wear them a little, just got them a week ago.
Great pants and tons of features.

Summer here and I wear them as pants

>>6525512
ITS SO CUTE

>>6525512
You're trying to build up rep because nobody liked your shitty copy+paste tumblr.

It's blatantly obvious.

>>6525517
really? awesome. the only problem with this site is that they have fixed dimensions unlike the Levi's site. I'm 6'4 and have long legs with a small waist, so I don't think I would fit well in a 32x32. Reckon I should wait until the Levi's store stocks more so I can get a longer inseam? or just get a 34x34 and take it to a tailor to get the waist fitted?
thanks for the help thus far

>>6525535
>Competitive Cyclist
Their price seems a little steep, but then again Levi's is sold out of most sizes since they're on sale there.
with the inseam I can't help much, and I'm not sure how easy they can be tailored.
Sorry man.

>>6525583
ah, okay well thanks for the help. I'll either have to pray for a re-stock or just buy a belt. Thanks anyway

>>6525616
No problem, wish I could've helped some more

>>6525532
>someone makes good post
>yell at them
>pretend anyone else gives a shit if someone is "trying to build up rep"

I have no opinion on what he's doing except damn good that he's making good posts, but so what if he is just trying to get attention? See everything written ever about human motivations for making contributions.

>>6525616

I own a pair, they fit true to size. They roll up to mid-calf but the fabric is fairly thick. They have a reflective strip which is exposed when you roll up, nice touch. The material collects dust pretty easily and doesn't stay pure black for long. Haven't washed em yet. They stretch a bit and work well for cycling around town. Haven't tested them in the rain yet. Overall I give them a 7/10 for functionality.

>>6525641
Yea, for me where the button snaps are they've turned grey just a tad. and the realllly pick up lint and shit.

>>6489033
how is that tech?

>>6525641
thanks!

>>6525652

Yeah exactly. If you're just going for cycling specific, you might be better off saving up (USD $200ish) for Rapha or Outlier. If you are going for the style, you're better off saving for Isaora, Acronym, Julius, etc.

>>6525694
I'm on my way for losing weight, and well the commuter's were affordable at the time.
I love them though.

where do i get basics? like t-shirts and hoodies and stuff. and what t-shirst are tech? what should i be looking into like specs

>>6525767
http://dressed-down.com/blog/2013/5/13/intro-to-techwear-part-1-the-bas

read this m8

>>6525812
cheers

What do you think of this? I need a light breathable jacket for cycling.

>>6526128

Any reason you prefer the yellow over the other colorways?

>>6526133
Visibility

>>6526137

Makes sense. The Pertex windbreakers they do are always great. No reason not to now that it's sale season.

>>6488901
lmao do you seriously walk around with a mask

>>6526634
Why not, especially in winter? Especially with the rapidly diminishing possibilities for anonymity in Western society. You're posting in our little refugee camp now, aren't you? Where's your legal name with a trip code?

Also, you see yuppies wearing ski face guards on some days.

>>6526694
faggot

>>6528021
lol

>>6526634
>not hiding your face somehow in large urban crowds
>2026

>>6506338
clean your fucking room

>>6525512
>tfw no qt tactical doge