/fa/ - Fashion

>>6467007
or this?

OP pic is fake

those shoes have never been released by raf

>>6467024
So I guess i'll cop saint laurent

I'm french so I like the YSL B)

you should post a fit pic so I can tell you which style fits you better bb

>>6467051

if those are your only two options, yeah

i don't like the saint laurents that much tho, have you realized that it's a lowtop just stuck with a weird tube to make it a hi-top yet?

>>6467063
>YSL
>not SLP

>>6467024

Real Astronauts have metal rings for zipper pulls, not leather tabs.

>>6467065
yes I did but I still like them but it's not my only option. Any suggestion for white hi-top?

>>6467051
the slps are nice, but why do you want the highs? the corresponding lowtops look a lot better imo, theyre even up there with cps when it comes to a simple high quality white sneaker.

have you looked at wings + horns?

>>6467074

feck off

>>6467078
http://www.ln-cc.com/en/restofworld/ann-demeulemeester/ann-demeulemeester-mens-nubuck-hi-top-sneakers/invt/ann0112035ice
theres these, but i think the slps look cleaner designwise

>>6467084
I think that they look a bit more "special" the lowtops are really pretty too but they look more like a normal sneaker. I want something that stand out a little more.

>>6467051
oh god not this again

>>6467110
>more
>more
>more
english is not my first language sorry

>>6467119

post a fuggin fit

>>6467119
you could have made a joke about it and put the last more on the last line like:

I think that they look a bit more "special" the lowtops are really pretty too but they look more like a normal sneaker. I want something that stand out a little

more.

>>6467123
its the last one foreal m8 ;)

>>6467134
fucking cop them already

>>6467160

no post one now of something you would wear with them it would help

>>6467134

come on help me help you

post a fit

>>6467140
I went to get the money today man
>>6467131
I'll post a fit when I have them

thanks everyone I'll cop the slp white hi for real now

>>6467161
>>6467165
my fit is still being shipped

>>6467024
the pic is from http://www.thebusinessfashion.co.uk
they're a legit retailer i'm pretty sure
there's stuff every season that gets picked up by very few retailers

>>6467024

op confirmed for fuccboi that thought all raf released for ss13 was shit wit fruity colored chains

>>6467211

What are you talking about? The pic is from an eBay store and someone already pointed out the fake zipper pull in the back. And a basic grey/white sneaker is not something that retailers wouldn't pick up.

>>6467260
yeah. they're probably trying to sell it through ebay as well. if you look at the location of the item on ebay it's in the same place as the store.
>And a basic grey/white sneaker is not something that retailers wouldn't pick up.
it's more too it than that. sometimes retailers doesn't have the opportunity on some items. it can depend on the timing of when the store orders, and other things. these shoes may very well be in other real stores that doesn't have a online site.
>someone already pointed out the fake zipper pull in the back
the zipper looks pretty much identical to the zippers on the raf astronaut sneakers that was released on the big online retailers.

>>6467332
so they are real or fake?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/RAF-Simons-SS13-Footwear-High-Top-Sneakers-White-White-UK7-10-/151051674815?pt=UK_Men_s_Shoes&var=&hash=item232b61a4bf

>>6467358
i don't know. but they definitely don't look fake. obviously same sole and zipper as real. stitching and design seems on really on point.

>>6467332

Look at the zipper pull. His have little tonal leather pulls. They're always issued with metal rings as zipper pulls. I don't know why you're belaboring the point.

>>6467358

Fake.

>>6467358

>SS13

no SS13 velcros came out that looked like that

fake as fuck

>>6467391

Also, Raf's zippers have custom pulls and don't say YKK on them. The whole metal ring is the pull and there is no YKK pull with leather attached to it.

>>6467447
>>6467455
look up real ss13 raf astros then.
are you fucking dumb, comparing with ss10 astros?

>>6467479

there were no ss13 raf astros

>>6467486
http://www.farfetch.com/shopping/men/raf-simons-high-top-sneaker-item-10345706.aspx?storeid=9466
http://www.ssense.com/men/product/raf_simons/white_and_green_patent_leather_astronaut_pocket_sneakers/66683
look at the zippers. shit faggot. get sruli rekt.

>>6467486
except for the ones that were made you mean?

http://www.ssense.com/fr/men/product/raf_simons/white_and_green_patent_leather_astronaut_pocket_sneakers/66683

shit, ssense carries fakes now too I guess

a designer releasing a staple product every season? that's unthinkable. imagine if RO did geobaskets every season? right? RIGHT?!

>>6467455
not anymore. raf has been cutting down costs lately. mainly moving production to portugal. a cheaper zipper is probably another smaller thing.