/fa/ - Fashion

>>6419459

>>6419456

>>6419463

>>6419443
>implying people actually can
they're exclusively sold in rick stores i believe

I wonder how lace up pure white colorways will look with a pair of jeans

>>6419470
there is one in london

>>6419470
that photo makes them look like some type of alien drone fleet from starcraft

how much £?

>implying these dont look like shit
>implying anyone could pull these off
>implying it doesnt look tacky as fuck

if <$800USD I'm in.
>>6419484
ideal fit.

>>6419485
you will never be space ninja, or whatever.

they will cost 400-500 bucks and I seriously hope you won't spend that much on a pair of fucken adidas shoes

>>6419495
babys first rick
either 400 for these or 1000 for geos which imo are harder to pull off

>>6419501
>geos which imo are harder to pull off
>geos
>harder to pull off
>than moon shoes

my sides have left the building

>>6419501
>wanting easy to wear rick owens
get the fuck out

>>6419470
wohoo I'm going to NY in september

>this is what fashion has become

They look much nicer with all the laces in.

so do you think you can actually run in these? i mean thats why rick did them but they dont look like running shoes

They defo look a lot better with the laces done up proper, as I thought

>>6419575
ikr? they don't look very flexible and are bulky.

>Chaos control!

>>6419470
what? they're probably going to be produced in higher much higher quantities than any other rick stuff any other season

>>6419641
>mfw

>>6419575
Do you even know what real running shoes look like

Bulk doesn't mean shit when running, it's the weight of the material

pretty depressing that this will be the case
rick why havent you opened up a store on the west coast you fucker... you know the state you GREW UP IN??

>>6419641

>>6419575
the soles look like they would wear out in no time..

plus why would buy a pair of $500 shoes to run in, when you could just get some nike knits??

only good for the style.

>>6419470
>>6419663
>>6419648
>make a show revolve exclusively around your brand new shoes
>limit them only to your very exclusive stores
>rick logic

>>6419661
even if theyre extremely light, they dont seem flexible or ergonomic

>>6419663
is there an actual source for this?

>>6419693
na

>>6419693
Her tumblr
She is 2edgy4me
Followed her without knowing she trips

Likes to post shit like nazi salutes and concentration camp photos nd shit
Its like shes 12 yes old and just discovered the internet and edginess but because she may be attractive? Idk she always hides her face she thinks its okay

Reminds me to unfolllow her, shits up my newsfeed

>>6419641

>>6421293
>she

>>6419641
omg

>>6421352

wtf is this

>>6421383
You haven't seen his new runway show?

http://www.rickowens.eu/

>>6419641

They look like dinosaurs that strap around your feet.

>>6421458
why does everyone that wears that stupid fucking jacket have to have their back turned to the camera trying to be all drive-edgy?

>>6421458
>that jacket

>>6421458
where the fuck do I get this jacket, like google dosen't turn up shit. I also can't find ima read caps

>>6421466

i know, right man?

people NEVER took pictures that way before drive came out. people that don't look directly at the camera and smile are SO autistic!

>>6421483
Undercover SS 12 "Open Strings"
imo it's one of those things that looks really good, within the collection, but is hard to integrate outside of the looks presented. Plus, it's not full leather, which is really a turn off for me.
Pretty cool jacket though!

>>6421491
i saw a pic of it from the front once and it looks p bad

>>6421483
Check eBay

I think a few people are selling it on sufu

>>6421491
hm, I always kinda assumed it would be sort of easy to pull of, I mean, it's just a black leather jacket. Just wear a black, nice quality hoodie, black pants, and black shoes with a white sole and that should look pretty good, at least in my mind. You could also switch out most of the things I said for a navy color and some of those things like maybe the hoodie for a darker grey and that would all look good. idk, just opinons

>>6421512
thank you, but seeing as though it's $1000 to get last years not compleatly leather jacket, i'll pass guys. I still like the way it looks tho

>>6421491

i prefer leather jackets to be more versatile

adding text to it makes it more of a novelty than something you throw on every day, preventing it from being a timeless design, if it was just solid black with no text, it would improve the overall design imo.

not to say it cant look aesthetically pleasing in a photoshoot by any means.

>>6421558
you sound like you know nothing lmao

>>6419575
only rick will run in these

>>6421589
i'm sorry I don't feel like paying $500 for a name, $300 for 4 words, and $200 dollars for the actual fucking jacket bruh

>>6421641
THANK YOU

>>6421641
youre paying for a design. when you buy a painting for 2k you dont pay for the canvas+paint+signature of the artist, you pay for a piece of art. fashion on this level isnt like ralph lauren polos with a brand logo, your logic is completely flawed.

Rick Jordans

>>6421641
I think have a complete misunderstanding of goods in general, especially "artisan" pieces. It's pretty stupid to think that you're paying only for the raw materials and the name. There's so much more to it

they're mostly bad, but still nice at times. Know what I mean? If these weren't rick most would agree they're straight up bad. But yeah, won't cop.

Those look like baby clown shoes...the Rick shoe designs are infantile, including geobaskets. This was said by a woman. Enjoy not getting laid in them.

>>6421672
>>6421696
ok guys, I get the idea of quality and like, I get what you're putting out. BUT, it's still $1000, doesn't this seem a little exssive for a probably used jacket (didn't pay deepattention to the listing) and from 2012, so like, that just brings that shit down, and when I think about it, maybe I founf one for $800, and thats a little more understandable, but I still just don't have the money to drop on something like that.

this brings me to another point. How do poeple who buy like rick and stuff not freak out if they accedently spill something on them, or if they like fall over into dirt, or even onto the ground at all, that would make my heart stop

>>6421717
>implying anyone who's seriously into fashion dresses for the opposite sex

>>6421293
I'm pretty sure shes really a guy, had to unfollow her too, she goes on about how shes a fashion design student then posts some shitty denim jacket she said she made that could easily be from topshop
plus she shits up my feed with her smugness

>>6421717
>This was said by a woman
>Implying
Enjoy being a beta. If you enjoyed fashion you wouldn't be dressing up just to impress the opposite sex.

>>6421726
woah, I can't fucking type
>deep attention*
>Brings that shit down in value*
>found*
>excesive*

>>6421726
is all a matter of preferences, but of course most people who buy designer pieces have the bank to suport their taste in clothing.

>>6421717
>getting sex dressed to get sex
easymode ahah y do that noob
hardmode it getting sex dressed to look #highfashion
>if ur on here 4 sex go outside

>>6421726
Well it's only really worth how much you're willing to pay for it. Consumer demand is a dictator in price.
It'd suck if I dropped like red wine on one of my expensive shirts, but for the most most day-to-day stains are removed easily. Like I got satay on one of my jumpers and after washing it came out. No biggie. Anyway, I don't usually spill stuff on myself anyway. I'm not going to not buy nice clothes just because I could spill stuff on them.
Also, don't be a retard and just be mindful when you're wearing expensive shit.

>>6419663
I know that feel.

What are some good shops to go to in LA?
I'm shopping this coming weekend

>>6421726
It doesn't matter what year it was released in, the concept of "last years" shit is only really viable in womens Trendhopping fashion

From the runway pics i didn't figure they had laces.

They looks so...normal now. Well, relatively normal.

>>6421850
that last season stuff pisses me off, when a woman whose fashion entirely revolves around desperate housewives and sex in the city thinks something is irrelevant because its from last season when really their shriveled up body is the only irrelevant thing

>>6421478
RIP in piece rei

>2016 Olympic games
>Track and field, 100m finals
>African nations devoid
>Without the latest seasons of rick sneaks, they can't remotely keep up
>The race begins and ends in a flash
>Even without track spikes, the patented marshmallow technology allows racers to break records like never before
>All three winners on the podium make a special request
>One great flag with their god's face appears
>Punk screaming replaces the anthem

so the thing about this being a Rick store exclusive is just bullshit derived from some cunt's tumblr?

>>6421956
yea shes notorious for bullshitting, why would adidas put in the money if only a handful of people would be able to buy them

>>6421956
Yes

>>6421967
this

Probably gonna be the most mass produces rick shoe

>>6421973
Yeah.. It didn't make sense to me for them to involve sweatshop labour if it was going to be super exclusive...

>>6421941

>usain bolt+rick ownes+raf simons+nike+addidas+asap colab
>come out with some b&w floral velcro dunk with three lightning bolt swooshes and seven zippered pockets so you can hold a passport, book and a sandwich which is made from italian leather taken from an actual italian leatherworker
>usain bolt wins because of superior genetics
>world goes batshit crazy trying to get a pair of the anti-christ of sneakers

>>6421956
they already said they'd be cheaper than the usual rick stuff. why make the price more ''accessible'' if you can't buy it anywhere ?

>>6421982
>asap colab
You do realize that being able to buy quality clothing does not necessarily mean you have an eye for designing it, right?

>>6419485
Truth

>>6422020
it just means the fuccbois will be allover it.

>>6421575
Yeah agreed. I much prefer their full leather, perfecto jackets, for straight wearability.
Undercover is definitely more of a trendier brand, I mean obviously their stuff is more novelty, it's hard to say how much of it will be relevant in years to come. That's part of the appeal, I guess, and I don't dislike them any less for it. (You already know all of this though lol)

>>6421483
>hey guys where do i buy these trendy peices of designer clothing that everyone on fa knew about 3 years ago
>WTF ITS TOO EXPENSIVE

every time

>>6422020
>joke

>>6422060
Undercover looks great. Looking great will never go out of style. I don't like everything they make, but some things I fall in love with.

>>6422112

>poe's law

>>6419470
false, can confirm 100% that burn rubber in detroit will be getting them along with other boutiques

>>6421540
>thinking it's a leather jacket
>not knowing the sleeves are cotton and flared
>not knowing it already has a hood

>>6422218
omg theres rick stockists in detroit?

>>6419443
anyone have a better pic of the all black ones w/ white laces?

tfw when i only live half an hour from a rick store.

>>6421941
should've been ima read for the anthem but aight

They really look good laced up

they were cool on the runway, especially in fits like pic related, but the square laces are just too foreign for the shoe to look good if you aren't a fashion wizard. Laced up they're just a typical Rick shoe, i.e., an exaggerated version of sportswear. And I love it. It embodies speed and sport while looking just out of the ordinary enough for it to be unique.

I just hope that they're comfy enough/appropriate for long runs so that I can justify buying a pair.

>>6422614
forgot pic

one of my favorite fits as well
Fernando Cabral always gets the best fits in Rick shows