/fa/ - Fashion

wooster-core

>>6399596
eh, at least the fitting isn't too bad

I like it. Maybe with oxfords instead of sneakers and green camo instead of brown camo, it could be much better.

did he miss?

I would laugh so hard if I saw him walking down the street

2#nxtlvl4u

green camo and black shoes would make it better.
no tie also

>>6399647
shouldn't try to copy wooster
it's like copying kanye

>>6399693
why because they both dress badly?

really isnt that bad

>>6399693
I have these pants, I get compliments on them all the time

>>6399701
because they have a "unique style~~"
not bad, but different

>>6399717
in what situation would you wear camo pants and a blazer and tie?

>>6399693
i was referring to the black bar

>>6399740

>breeches

>>6399740

To meet a designer at the showroom? To attend a press event? To out to lunch?

>>6399740
the #fresh asians in the back lmao'ing at wooster's fit

>>6399701
I was gonna say because the MFA pic features a kid trying really hard to imitate a full grown man.

It's why fedoras and trench coats and shit don't work - the clothes themselves are fine, it's just that their worn in imitation of someone trying to be 'le classy adult'

>>6399740
to a party
to lunch
to fuck around
to work, depending on the dress code

>>6399795
To the sea
To Space
In the bath

>>6399812
>in the bath

lel

>hates mfa for being basic
>hates mfa when experimenting

>>6399596
>>6399693

I think he actually looks better than Wooster does here. It's already a bold pairing, combining those shoes along with the uncomplimentary tops and bottoms is too much.

captcha: heMnize participiated

>>6401881
the problem is not the experimenting because it's been done dozens of times before

the problem is the poor execution

instead of trying to copy wooster he should've done something on his own or with his own style

>>6401889

hope you arent posting that pic as good execution

not with that bottom half

>>6401892
That half is exactly what I love about it. But okay, that's what opinions are for.

>>6401892
get out

>>6401892
I like it. Looks like a darker version with more personality than the shit in op

>>6401889
if he did his own style, you would still make fun of him

smh

>>6401892
because good execution doesn't mean fit matching materials, color hues and silhouette but that some gay paki tripfag likes it

log off

>>6401892
mfw
the jacket sleeve and shoulder (if anything) is what brings it down imo
otherwise, 2smooth

>>6401907

jacket sleeve is bad too imo

tbh the whole fit is pretty terrible

>>6401918
nah
ur dadcore

>>6401907

if we're going to be talking proportions, he could have gone shorter with the blazer to exaggerate the length of the pant.

his head still looks disproportionately large for his frame.

>>6401924
idk i think its sloppy construction

i think it looks good regardless but a nicer jacket would definitely be well...nicer

i think proportions look good and nothing is wrong w/ his frame, if anything the jackets shoulders are a bit boxy making his head look smaller

>>6401924
>his head still looks disproportionately large for his frame.
>whuts angles means

>>6401948
>blue lines is where i think his body's edge is
>red lines are points of weakness on the jacket

OP posted a pic of a knoch fit you all always praisr but since its from mfa u diss it

LOL

>>6401948
the shoulders look boxy because he's arching his back, well back

if the jacket was fitted after your blue line it wouldn't be proportionate anymore

>>6402010
i would agree but if you look at where the sleeve attaches to the body i think the problematic jacket design is p.obvious

i wouldnt really know though dont have any formal educ. in this stuff.

>>6402021
analyze the op pic the same

and maybe woosters

it's interesting

>>6402025
why?
i cant see shit in the op

i dont believe in your 'proportional' voodoo.

>>6401948

idk maybe my brain wants to make everything taller, more slouchy. i kind of want to make his pants baggier but i stopped myself before i defaced something good (though i've seen better fits from him tbh)

>>6399623
are you joking?

>>6401887
Navy blue pairs fine with all those neutral colors.

>>6402044
now that's what I'd call dispropotionate

somethings wrong with your brain son

>>6399751
Those are jodhpurs.

>>6402044
i think the jacket design problems becomes really evident when you downscale almost everything and the jacket shoulder still looks huge

tbh i think that image is more true to knoch's frame, if he had a more slimmer and 'well fitted' jacket he could easily achieve that

>>6402048
The jacket fits. The pulling at the waist is more owing to the fact he's moving, the blazer is unstructured, and made of cotton which does not drape as well as wool would.

>>6402062
I think the decision to wear that jacket and not get something more fitted is apparent by how disproprtionate everything looks in the mock up.

>>6402062
>>6402049
>>6402049
>>6402062

well if we're really going to get all technical.
the original is about 7 heads high.
i subconsciously (and rather crudely) edited his frame to about 8 heads.
~as per wikipedia~
the average person is usually depicted as being 7.5 heads high.
a person of nobility or stature is depicted being 8 heads high.

so nothing is wrong with my brain cruel anon, i'm just very bored.

>>6402102
You do realize that he's not even standing upright and his whole body is arched?

I'm out. This shit is way too autistic.

>>6402102
yeah you're an autist

also you're taking it from like the bottom of his neck to the top of his hair...

>>6402107

It's /g/ you guys. i've been lured into their desktop threads and now look at me.

>>6399596
I really like that jacket, what material is that?

>>6402127
post a desktop

>>6399791
>fedoras and trench coats themselves are fine

No just leave now

>>6402102

ur a fkin retart #lmao

go sea a brain docter cos ur dum !