[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 50 KB, 606x378, unpopular opinions.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6326294 No.6326294[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

>Hawaiian shirts

>Voluptuous women (fuck your thigh gap obsession)

>There are nice cargo shorts out there, not all of them are baggy teenager-looking shit.

>Geobaskets are ugly, I'd much rather have a pair of black and white high-top Nike Vandals

>> No.6326299

Confirmed for poor.

>> No.6326301

noone cares faggot

>> No.6326307

>>6326299
>>6326301
lmao dat mad

>> No.6326309

SLVR & Y-3

>> No.6326313
File: 66 KB, 1000x637, tumblr_m9tj11ikPF1rx3u95o4_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6326313

everyone always says these look disgusting or like converse dipped in semen or w/e but i think they are dope as fuuuck

>> No.6326314

Being a minimally decent person.

>> No.6326318

>>6326313
Really? People post Drips all the time in inspo/grail threads.

They are really fantastic though.

>> No.6326319

>>6326313
they are more art then shoes

>> No.6326320

>>6326318

yeah pretty much all the time i post them, a bunch of people are like "waste of money the drips fall out" or "those look horrible"

but idc, if i ever see a black pair in my size im buying that shit instantly

>> No.6326321

I like girls with a little bit of acne.

>> No.6326322

>>6326309
/fa/ likes y3 tho

>> No.6326329

>sandals
>polos

>> No.6326330

>>6326322
h8ing on the branding though.

>> No.6326335

>>6326320
Ahaha the drips would be cool if they had longevity but even without them they still look rad as fuck.

I would cop em.

>> No.6326349
File: 75 KB, 900x1350, steampunk_fashion_show_my_oppa_by_myoppa_creation-d5zhbp2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6326349

steampunk.

>> No.6326346

blazers + jeans situationally
liberal humanism
people of other races

>> No.6326352

I like short girls. 5' 2" and under (157 cm). Tall girls are too manly

>> No.6326351
File: 496 KB, 500x233, run.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6326351

>>6326346
>blazers + jeans situationally

>> No.6326361

>>6326349
I kinda like this. However the crotch rises too high for me

>> No.6326378

>>6326321
Or a little bit of acne scars/redness from pimples.
I have no idea why, but I don't find it bad at all.

>> No.6326385

>>6326352
You have to admit, though.
A slim, elegant, feminine woman that's around 5'10" is pretty god-tier.

I'm only 6'0", so I probably wouldn't date someone that tall, but when you see the master race, you have to respect it.

>> No.6326387
File: 188 KB, 934x1767, 1367817767412.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6326387

>>6326378

>> No.6326388

>>6326378
it looks cute, and more human, that's probably why.

>>6326352
I agree, but since I'm 6'1", short starts at 5'4" for me.

>> No.6326394

>>6326385
if she has long legs, yes. I'm a big fan of long legs, but they can't be sticks. They need a little bit of thickness. Not cellulite thick, but enough to make the thighs look healthy. If she has twigs for legs, it's a total turn-off

>> No.6326401

>>6326394
I guess we differ there, I don't mind twigs.
Maybe it's because I'm nearly heroin chic body frame...

>> No.6326410

>>6326388
That's probably it.

>> No.6326428
File: 293 KB, 1594x1030, safe to post 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6326428

>>6326401
Here's a picture of what I'm talking about, legs like this. This is how I prefer them. This girl is 5'9

>> No.6326432

>>6326428
Definitely some meat on those bones.
If that's your thing, that's your thing.
Good looking gal.

>> No.6326437

Nice blog post OP.
Follow me on Tumblr
fa-is-my-blog.tumblr.com

>> No.6326435

>>6326432
well thanks man! That's my ex-gf, haha.

>> No.6326443

Gay sex with japanese or korean?

>> No.6326445

>>6326320

I'd cop two pairs one for wear and one for show/to look at and admire

>> No.6326451

>>6326443
The one that makes you happy cuh

>> No.6326458

>>6326428
>dat ham

>> No.6326469
File: 17 KB, 559x556, thats the best I can do.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6326469

>>6326437
>getting this mad about someone else's opinion

lmao, butthurt thigh gap/geobasket fan detected

>> No.6326508
File: 129 KB, 550x825, BAPTISTE-GIABICONI.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6326508

People like to hate on the real Baptiste for some reason.

>> No.6326521

>>6326313

I have a pair in the mail B-)

>> No.6326526

>>6326508
with pretty good reason

>> No.6326536

>>6326526
Yes jealousy is a pretty good reason.

>> No.6326548
File: 846 KB, 480x270, heh.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6326548

>>6326536

>> No.6326584

OP sounds like a fat piece of shit.

>> No.6326602

>>6326584
I don't understand why people are getting so mad.

>> No.6326626

This should be interesting..

>I like cargo pants (but not cargo shorts)
>I think proper facial hair can improve the majority of men's faces if cared for properly (unless you were blessed with model-tier facial genetics)
>I personally think the same for long hair (both genders) - unless they are too lazy/poor to care for it (which is sadly the case for most) or they are clearly balding..
>I think long coats such as trench coats are /fa/ - but most people give it a bad image by not wearing it right
>The same goes for wallet chains, leather pants, and leather peacoats
>I like "hipster glasses" when worn by QT-3.14 girls
>I like fingerless gloves
>I like orange/yellow tinted computer glasses and seem logical - though I'd wouldn't wear them myself because of their "gaymur" stigma
>I like the concept of cyberpunk fashion, but I think 99.99% of the time it is sadly done in an OTT and gimmicky manner

>> No.6326702

>>6326428
whale

>> No.6326786

>>6326626
I agree, but:
1. straight hair looks much better long. you can't have curly long hair and look good, and afro hair looks best short
2. you can pick almost any piece of clothing and wear it like you're autistic. but, as you said at the tinted computer glasses - some things are not to be worn just because of the stigma
3. cyberpunk "fashion" is more like cyberpunk costumes. but, you can take some elements and incorporate them in actual clothing - just like how you can wear colourful shoes and shirts, elements of clown costume, and still look ok

>> No.6326829

>>6326626
based on your post I feel like I know exactly what you dress like.....and its awful

>> No.6326852

Boat shoes (never understood the hate for these.)
Long hair on women
Looks other than goofninja and swagnigga streetwear

>> No.6326848

I prefer the fit of traditional MA-1 jackets to slim fit.

>> No.6326865

>>6326330
i like the big ass y3 because i like typography on my clothes, but some of the shoes scream "hurr i know who yohji yamamoto is pls like me", because they print his fucking name on it

>> No.6327239

bump for more /fa/ mad

>> No.6327282

>>6326626

So... you think neckbeard fashion is cool then?

>> No.6327298

flip flops

>> No.6327734

Zara

>> No.6327766

I think ASOS has some quality shit for a good price.

>> No.6327781

>>6326319
than

>> No.6327789

>Voluptuous women, curvy and big tits.
>Plain Janes
>Tattoos
>Individualism, unlike most /fa/ people who just follow the usual criteria.

>> No.6327797

>Leather jackets.
>Some aspects of the grunge style
>Some aspects of the 80's style

>> No.6327822

> being showy with wealth is not what true patricians do
> so what if clothes were bought at a mall
>i prefer healthy physiques over skinny (no excuse for being day, though)
> being fit is more important than being /fa/

>> No.6327829

>>6327822
Such a /fit/ way of thinking. Why are you here?

Wrong board.

>> No.6327851

>>6327797
the leather jacket thing is one guy who is trolling/dumb

>>6327829
the fact that you said this proves that his post is an unpopular opinion
and you can be into looking good and have other priorities

>> No.6327956

>>6327851
I never said he couldn't be looking good and have other priorities. I'm saying with his priorities, he should go to /fit/ for obvious reasons.