/fa/ - Fashion

they look like jack purcell cons with a heart

that being said I would cop, I love my wonderwood

>>6287804
I have the whites with black hearts. Get tons of compliments on them.

Good cop if you can get them for a decent price.

>>6287828
they are better quality than regular all-stars right? They are build more like the purcells right?

>>6287837
They're ARE the purcells, or at least mine are.

Pretty sure they're just purcells with hearts on the side

>>6287846
alright that's cool, they are like $10 more than purcells anyway, but i'm finna cop hightops

>>6287852
Good luck bruh.

>>6287809
>they look like jack purcell cons with a heart
because that's exactly what they are.
I presume that the quality is better though (it better be)

>>6287852
>they are like $10 more than purcells
no way. They're only $70? What shop are you buying from?

>>6287837

Yeah, even the "regular" chuck taylors are higher quality than what Converse puts out. Double layered fabric, IIRC, kind of like old Cons before Nike bought them.

>>6287879
>Nike copped cons
was this recent? I remember rocking cons all throughout middle school up till 10th grade and they held up, but now looking at people's feet I look at cons and think "shit I used to wear those pieces of shit?

>>6287852
>$10 more
what

reg purcells are $60
cdg are $130

>>6287873
They are converse, are they supposed to be better quality than converse when they are converse?

>>6287893
ah, so you're right!

I was under the impression they were $90 because the only time I saw them in a store (nordstrom I believe) that's how much they were

>>6287889

2003 I believe, quality went down after that, obviously.

>>6287894
They're a collab. It's CDG Play x Converse Jack Purcell. They're also 125 dollars. I would hope that x2 markup is reflective of something other than brand wankery

where to cop EU?

>>6287897
aww

i want them sooo bad

but ugh...you're paying $70 more for a heart on them

>>6287908
>>6287894

see:

>>6287879

guys, for poorfriends are these a decent substitute?

>>6287879
>"regular" chuck taylors
you mean regular purcells?

>>6287879
i have no clue what this post is suppose to mean

>>6287928
no, get purcells.

>>6287931

cdg play chuck taylor are higher quality than the chuck taylor converse puts out, i.e. these:

>>6287928

>>6287928
get the regular wht

>>6287944
thanks

makes me more confident about coping them

>>6287944
yeah, but why'd you call cdg's chucks "regular chucks"?

>>6287954
These arent even Chuck Taylor, these are Jack Purcell, and no they are not any better quality than any other Jack Purcell shoe that Converse makes.

>>6287944
No they are not, I have both, they are just the same.

w2c?

Cop?

Where can I cop black Nike Roshes with the black swoop?

>>6288132
just nike id them B)

black and white swoosh guy here

>>6287909
>tfw it cost me less to order Play's online than going to the mall and buying plain ones

>>6288074

Really? I might be mistaken. Could you post a pic of them next to each other?

>>6288257
not him but these look better than the converse my homie wears (looking at them right now) his are teh normal ones with the star like the white ones posted above

the canvas on these cdg ones look about the same. These are double-layered, but the construction is a bit different. These don't have that stitching under the first 3 eyelets, and the cdg ones look like they were attached to the sole a bit better (looks like a different sole too)

>>6288140
m8 that's sixty bucks more. I can just buy the zappos one and paint the swoop

>>6288257
I only have the cdg ones with me atm, the only that differs is the color palette and that the converse logo is sewn rather than printed.

Im guessing this is the case with the Jack Purcells as well

>>6288472
sewn logo

>>6288479
WAIT WTF DO THE PLAY CONS HAVE THAT????????????

>>6288482
Yeah they do

cdgs on the black dude or no?

>>6288542
oops

>>6288547
shit, that nigger is hella fit

>>6288565

Adonis Bosso

>>6288547
leg goals
gf goals
friend goals
not shoe goals because they basic

>>6288547
all these beautiful people ;_;

>>6288547
I love dudes like that - dudes that are ACTUALLY black - showing up and putting black people that are like 30% white to shame

wouldbefriendswith/10

>>6288111
I'm diggin it bruh, makes that black on on the sole seem in-place

>>6288583
>tfw British people ruined/saved my bloodline by fucking into it
I don't know how to feel

>>6288583
lel wtf are you saying

>>6288547
great fit but no i dont think so

>>6288479
thanks for showing me this, something I would have overlooked on site pics

>>6288709
Looks p good irl imo. And it holds up a whole lot better than the printed logo.

I just got the black high tops in the mail 3 days ago,and I love them. The sole padding on them really feels comfortable, and I think that justifies the price. I got them mostly for the look, so I was expecting that thin chuck sole padding so I am surprised. Also the sole seems to be much more sturdy compared to the regular chucks.

>>6290242
pics?