/fa/ - Fashion

No but just wear them.

>>6276083

Not /fa/ but good for general purpose.

yes, if they have a double sole and a price tag of at least $1000

>>6276581

like this

>>6276585
these do look better though imo
if converse simplified their design, like removed the contrast stitching, the line on the sole etc, they'd look better and i'd probably buy a pair
half way through writing that i remembered the cdg play collabs

people say these are just overpriced chucks, but why can't all chucks look like this?

>>6276083
I own a pair they are gr8
look at Vans sk8 hi op you'll love those

>>6276604
they also have the (old) double layer canvas and that beautiful contrast stripe on the back

>>6276604
You can just color the stitching and rip the black line off.

i love the john varvatos collab

i've been wearing that as my entry level go to shoe since about 2008

the see through sole is awesome looking too

i've been wearing these cheap monday converse rip offs. they definitely improved the design

>>6276604
>>6276585

while these indeed look better than the disgusting originals. they still look like cheap clownshoes to me. the only ones I think are passable are the white high top cdg's, but only on girls.

>>6276674

they only look like clown shoes if you have disproportionally large feet.

also, the first thing everyone should do as soon as they get black chucks is to swap the laces with black.

skagways or bust fgt