/fa/ - Fashion

op is a faggot

bump, could we get more help in the Uk stores section

>>6272556
I mean, I've had my dick sucked by another dude, but that hardly makes me gay.

>>6272551
I don't live in the UK :/ i can do some research on UK stores but idk how much help i'll be

>>6272543
Whoever owns the server needs to purchase a new domain name. The current one is pretty silly with respect to relevance to the board.

Buy a new one, align the DNS, forward requests for tuxbell to the new domain name. Then you can be taken seriously.

>>6272686
What do you suggest?

>>6272686
autism
i don't evn believe ur mike

>>6272686
Did you prefer "thefaggotstore"
lmao

>>6272686
fuk off fake mike

>>6272692
Something that people would make a connection to /fa/ from.

>>6272703
Sounds like somebody is offended. Domains are extremely cheap, there literally isn't any excuse not to change it, it's chump change.

>>6272712
No I didn't really care, but I understood its relevance because "the faggot store" used to be a common phrase on this board.

>>6272733
does there really even need to be a connection? The mods could just link to it like <a href="http://tuxbell.com>Sticky, or whatever</a>

>>6272692
www.stopthegothninja.com

>>6272801
hidey-ho, edgearino!

Can someone please add this

CHILE STORES & PLACES TO BUY AT
(Santiago)
Barrio Lastarria (http://www.barriolastarria.com/tiendas_ropa_vestuario_barrio_lastarria.php): Low-Medium. Local designers sell their collections here. Most garments are one or two of a kind. Jewelry can be the most expensive thing to purchase.
Apumanque (http://www.apumanque.cl/): Mall/Fast Fashion-Low. Most clothes are Made in China, but it offers a great variety of stores for all age ranges. The stores Ansonia and TODOPIEL carry nice shoes.
Costanera Center (http://www.costaneracenter.cl/): Mall/Fast Fashion through Medium. Almost all of the big American clothing brands are here, but most stores carry scraps that couldn't be sold elsewhere. Quality:Price may not be good, buy at your own discretion.
Patronato (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrio_Patronato): Mall/Fast Fashion-Low. Santiago's fashion district by default. Prices are a fraction than what they are in richer areas of the city. Great for alternative clothing (goth, Indian, Chinese, Korean, etc.)
Providencia Street: Mall/Fast Fashion-Low. Its popularity has increased in the last couple of years thanks to stores like Nostalgic, Vintage and Cazadora, which offer an alternative to mall clothes (not really but they aren't as bad). Also home to second hand clothing stores like Orange Blue and European Clothes.
Barrio Bandera: Second-Hand Tier. All clothes are second hand. Gotta have the patience to look through mountains of dirty clothes but I assure you it's worth it when you find something cool.
Barrio Bellavista (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrio_Bellavista): Low-Medium. Hipster neighborhood that's been on the rise since 2000. Also has plenty of national designers and lapizlazuli jewelry stores. Careful with street vendors.
All other malls: Mall/Fast Fashion through Medium. More regurgitated fashion trends from last year.

Don't miss: wool products from La Ligua, which are good tier for a very affordable price.

the sunglasses section needs work, if anybody knows dick about sunglasses

>>6272879
holy shitwhy couldn't you add that yourself.
I can add it i guess;_;

>>6272897
I-I'm scared of fucking up the wiki page anon.

Sorry ;_;

I was also checking, we don't have a women's shoes article. Might look into making it...

>>6272551
Yeah sure, i'll do some. Sorry if i fuck the formatting.

>>6272879
>Chile
the fuck?

>>6272907
What's wrong? Too...South American for you?

>>6272902
Done, now we have a stores in chile page! Thanks for letting us know that there's stuff in chili

>>6272905
Added some detail. If someone could do stuff for Ben Sherman, Hackett, Mandon (never heard of this), Massimo Dutti, Reiss, Selfridges, Stuarts London, plus any others you can think of, then that'd be great.

where dopeman at

Added Esprit to the UK section. Don't know if anyone actually shops there, but I think it's worth a nod.

Guys, being an eurofag, where can i buy jeans? levi's here cost like 100 fucking euros

>>6272551
Just added a few stores. Gonna fix the blank ones now.

>>6272983
See
>>6273268

>>6273268
you are doing gods work son

bump, we need some more help.

>>6273246
look at the stores anon, you can buy jeans anywhere. but for cheapness to quality ratio i recc chaep monday, unbranded, and april 77

ITS A NEW DAWN, ITS A NEW DAY

Ausbras write a synopsis of the style in your city in the stores section pls, doing newcastle now

coolguy22 are you in the thread

Amerifrat here, if there's anything that needs doing

>>6276203
If you or anyone knows about sneakers that section could use help.

Also why is there's a sneaker page in the shoes place when theres already a link?

>>6276231
idk mang.
maybe because it's so much info.

>>6276195

yeah what's up

>>6276203
re-build the basics page

no mall brands this is /fa/shion

not which thrift, and wal mart clothes can i throw together to look somewhat presentable on my rare trips outside to game stop board

>>6276485
yo sieg
do you think we should split the basics page into two pages

like one for neckbeards who just wants to dress basic bitch so them don't spam the board with "the sticky is too hard"

and one thats much better
cuz ur adding shit about baggy fits and such and /v/irgins and the like will be all like "whut"

>>6276478
yo why'd you remove reborn from artisanal

>>6276485
>look at how much money I can throw at my wardrobe

>>6276500
you're telling that to the dude who just saved a bunch of kids from levis 511, perry ellis sunglasses and hugo boss

>>6276503
if you want to build that part you can go for it, then have it transition into what we have now for more experienced people, possibly those coming from reddit.

they won't stay if we're parroting the same bullshit about cheap target suit seprates they love on mfa

>>6276508
kk i'll move nething that seems 2basic4me from the actual page onto it

>>6276503

Because I changed that column from tiers to price points which makes way more sense, and artisanal isn't a price point. Maybe the rest of the wiki should conform because it makes much more sense of maybe Canadians will be the only ones that have a shopping page that you can sort by price instead of by some ridiculous "tier" list.

>>6272543
We need people to use Canadas table and apply it to the other sections,m it looks so much better

>>6276521
4chan is would wide

what dollar are you taling about?!

julius is cheaper in japan than it is at atelier
levis are cheaper in america than in europe

and everything is cheaper in americathan it is in aus.

>>6276521
why is the tier list ridiculous
it emphasizes actual quality over random prices

certain places have inflated prices, for example jcrew isn't that good but their stuff is mid priced. In tiers, its classed as low, but in prices, it would be medium.

The reason the artisanal tier existed wa secause there was a difference between it and high. If there was only a high everything from CDG/Acne to boris/CCP would be in one tier, which is a GROSS oversimplification.

>>6276532

Julius is considered a high price point all over the planet bruv

even something like UC which I think has the most hometown discrepancy of any JP street brand price wise is still consider high in Japan

You don't even need to set price ranges to define because it's usually pretty obvious.

I only used the already existing tier names which worked fine: low, medium, high. if somewhere was mid-high (like most diffusion lines) or low-medium (slightly nicer than cheap) i specified in the description.

has the moot gotten back to anyone regarding this yet?

>>6276565
the moot hasn't replied yet

>>6276562
see my post pls

>>6276536

>why is the tier list ridiculous

you almost answered it yourself with that post

because price points are concrete, tier lists are debateable. everyone defines them differently. what if order my list by quality? rick owens is going in shit tier and he better deal with it. what if i order my list by what will get me laid? okay, can goose and lacoste is going in god tier. you want to define it by vision? i think any designer with a perfume is a sell out and going in low tier.

don't agree with my tier lists? tah-dah we've reached the conclusion that sorting by price makes infinitely more sense and is a hundred times more useful. more people have a budget than care about tier lists.

>>6276575
its not just quality, its aesthetic value too. It only breaks down if we limit the value of the product to one attribute like you are, or use opinions in the tiers. Please re-read my bit about j crew and the difference between acne and higher up stuff

>>6276575
prices are obvious

and price does not denote a good piece or not

like all saints....same pricepoint as band of outsiders....

>>6276588

Let the person browsing the wiki define for themselves what they consider shit and god tier.

I can already see how this stupid system pans out, everything dark and edgy ends up in masterful artisan masterpiece tier and stuff that's just expensive and looks cool ends up in high tier with D&G. You're right that my system overgeneralizes but it's a fucking store directory. You have a million other pages to "educate" the consumer and fill their heads with what you or the "voice of /fa/" or whatever you want to call it considers god and shit tier.

I'm not going to say it again because I'm on my lunch break and about to peace for 8+ hours: price point works better and makes more sense on the store directories. If you really want to curate it how bout you just don't allow crappy stores on the directory? I deleted Club Monaco for exactly that reason, because it's a waste of time and even if you're broke there are better options.

I noticed the Aus list actually had awful stores exclusively for warning people about them, that works too but this whole tier list business is retarded.

>>6276610
I don't even like dark/edgy stuff, it's not my fault more of the well designed stuff is in that direction now. High tier is for people who want nice clothes, its not BAD because its high, obviously. I personally have never had any intention to buy anything in the artisanal tier. Removing club monaco is your personal preference, it isnt "crappy", its just low-tier. They have alright stuff when sales happen. There are people interested in the lower end of the spectrum who would be interested in it, just like there would be people on the higher end who would benefit from the separation of artisanal. YOUR perspective isn't the only one. Please don't enforce your personal opinions on the wiki, its for people of all demographics, not just yours.

Ted Baker is pretty poor in terms of quality and stuff.

It's a bit stupid to put it in the same tier as Reiss and Kafka and stuff.

>>6276610
Why not just use two, three or more columns?
Price, Price/Quality, Style etc.
I agree, the current list is somewhat useless - I don't give a shit how Artisanal and (n)edgy(n+2)me something is, I just want to find the cheapest shop that sells Yohji.

>>6276627
Similar price points though. Wouldn't it be better to sort by price then write in the comments section about it's quality? More objective sorting that way.

>>6276639
less than half of the listed stores conform to one "style"

you can just check the descriptions, try gilt or guyi consignment. Plus, anything that sold yohji would automatically be put in high anyways, because high starts at around mr. porter territory currently

>>6276644


I think it's perfect as it is, I'd just nominate Ted Baker to the same level as Topman/Zara/H&M

>>6276652
Why would you sort by quality though? People look for different things in different clothes. Quality may be important to some but not to others, at least price is a universal value that everyone can appreciate. Any other factors that may differentiate brands can be written about.

>>6276660
the tiers are not just by quality
its quality, design, aesthetic value.
How is that less important than price?

>>6276610
>I'm about to leave

>>6276644
>>6276660
>Replies to these posts while ignoring banana's because he #rekt you

autism

>>6276666

Design and aesthetic value are completely subjective though. And build quality isn't necessarily what everyone ranks brands by. If you judge by those 3 factors where does Rick Owens go? Fair enough it may be considered with high design and aesthetic but the build quality is wank as fuck.

Order by price should definitely stay. Maybe the addition for separate columns for different attributes like the ones you listed?

>>6276706
i didn't even consider this

>>6276711
reply to my other post. reborn doesn't even sell rick, I never even mentioned rick. Stop talking about him.

>>6276716
I'm another guy?

>>6276718
screencap.

>>6276722
how would that help?

>>6276732
to prove it

>>6276732
>>6276718
>>6276711
>>6276575
>>6276660
>>6276644
>>6276610

screencap this post

>>6276567
>>6276565
What rambles my jammies is that a mod showed up saying he needed a pic for the sticky then vanished.

I think there's a little too much thought going into the whole "tiers" thing. It was originally tiered by price, and I think that's the way it should stay. The subjective nature of other factors makes it hard to accurately describe a store in a few columns, and I'd rather not have a simple 'stores' list end up a clusterfuck because there are a million columns. but that's just
imo
nyp
__i
__n
__i
__o
__n

also, i'm the site admin. hi.

>>6276753
the person who made the page said it was price/worth, from what i heard

>>6276739
?

>>6276775
it doesn't show (You) beside the post I replied to, so it means you opened another tab.

>>6276778
or maybe it's a bunch of people calling you a nerd

>there's no way everyone on /fa/ thinks I'm lame it must be just one gay samefagging XD

>>6276782
no one called me a nerd or lame, and yes, i'm pretty sure its only you who cares this much about price tiers

>>6276785
that last comment was literally my first post in this thread

IDK why you care so much about making a new shit sticky, it's not like you come here for fashion, just to shitpost

>"we need to put le more infopics and how-to guides! Fuck learning about fashion through experience and personal taste, just give everyone pictorials XDDDD"

>>6276789
.

>>6276790
that's right bitch stay silent

>>6276796
You're clearly upset.

clearer knowebm

updated

Guys im really sorry i couldnt finish the list(african shops)
school and life are pree insane right now.It'll be uploaded by the weekend i promise.

>>6277452
It's all good bruv. iktf.
Bump for mod(s)

bump

why not just ask on /q/?

We need a cologne/perfume section

>>6278791
some guy posted on /q/ but they told him to email moot. i really don't get why that one mod implied he'd sticky it then disappeared. he even took the old sticky down. like wot.

>>6278899
dub dubs have spoken. do you know anything about cologne? i'll set up a page for you.

>>6272712
>>6272686
I liked "thefaggotstore" a lot :^(

Did anyone save the sticky pictures from the last thread? They're all gone now. Can you post them? I'm not sure if the mod saved any.

>>6279048
did it 404? well tits.
I didn't save any.

>>6279084
he can just use the wiki one doe

>>6279084
true, I think that was the most suggested one anyway. worst case, someone from /gd/ remakes the flag-esque logo in like 3 seconds.

>>6279084
Found them on the archive. Thank you based Warosu.

>>6272907
Im from chile as well, is there a problem? And besides, there are a lot of chileans who browse /fa/

>>6278996
lets do it agen, i already emailed moot like 2 days ago

>>>/q/625971

>>6279192
>>>/q/
lel

>>6276231
The shoes page was made before the sneakers page. Why shouldn't sneakers be in the shoe section?

>>6279172
Update the Chilean stores article if you can, fellow Chilean bro. I tried making it as concise as possible because listing every single brand would be eternal, plus, that way we can focus on certain neighborhoods that carry all the worthwhile things.

Someone add more stores to Spain

>>6279482
>>6279482
>>6279482
>>6279482
>>6279482

>>6279482
>>6279482
>>6279482
>>6279482
>>6279482