/fa/ - Fashion

>>6262298
>blind people shades

Yah, but the people we want to hire us are ignorant fucks in their 40s-60s that don't think women have voices and so on

>>6262298
It's rather '70s...

>>6262314
All the more reason to dress like them like in OP's pic.

so you'd rather wear baggy pants that fit like a dress than something that emphasizes the masculine form of your legs? ok bru

>>6262349
>masculine

>posts picture of dude with some of the most anxious shoulders I've ever seen
>posts picture of dude that probably takes it in the ass

-

Yeah - okay, anon

>>6262361
bish please there's nothing manlier than two guys fucking

>>6262349
He doesn't look nearly as "masculine" as a man in a proper Italian suit.

>baggy pants that fit like a dress

As opposed to skinny pants that fit like pantyhose? Yeah I'll take the wide-leg trousers.

>>6262349
>probably takes it in the ass
projecting

>>6262380
Oh you mad now braw

>>6262298
Fuck your wide trousers.

THIS is how a gentleman should look.

>>6262382
I guess aside from a dude borderline raping a girl that fucking loves it

>>6262379
yea bro whatever you say

>>6262380
>autism

>>6262389
Is that that picture actually a refute on your end

>>6262383
not really. you can think that if it makes you feel better

>>6262389
>proving his point

>>6262398
top lel you def. mad

>>6262394
nigga looks hard as fuck. Why you scared of showing off your legs bruh?

Afraid somebody's gonna see those hams you're packing under dem baggy jeans???

>>6262406

>implying wearing proper-fitting trousers means I'm ashamed of my body

>>6262415
not proper fitting in any sense of the term

>>6262415
those aren't "proper fitting". the ones that guy on the right walking away from the camera are alright though.
also that scarf is gay as fuck

>implying there is only one way pants should fit

>>6262419
>>6262427
>straight-leg, un-tapered, with one break in flow towards the ankle

>not properly-tailored

I forget how /fa/ has been overrun with 16yo OFWGKTA fanaticals.

>>6262440
>implying there isn't a correct way, and an incorrect way for everything

You don't belong on the internet.

>>6262457
>correct way
>way i personally like
>incorrect way
>way i personally dislike

yeah ok

>>6262445
it's not the 1800s any more
in case you were wondering, fedoras aren't in style any more either

>>6262469
It isn't the 1600s anymore either, faggot. >>6262389

>>6262457
personally I think the correct way is the Thom Browne way

>>6262474
those pictures don't look anything alike
what are you even doing on /fa/ if you don't care about fashion?

>>6262474
>not knowing fashion is cyclical

>>6262474
this is the part where you wonder if this guy really wears pants like the ones he posts or if he's just trolling and i really hope its the former and he goes over photo books of him wearing 1800s clothes and smiles smugly about he didnt pander to pleb-tier fashion trends and then he dies happy and outer space looms over his head

>>6262482
>calling out >>6262445 but not calling out >>6262389

Get over yourself, skinnyfat bitch.

>>6262469
>implying frock coats aren't /fa/ as fuck

A little more volume in the leg is preferrable for a suit where the idea is to radiate masculinity through posture/stance/etc.

Skinny for jeans is fine because that's currently the trend.

>>6262495
that guy was obviously being facetious
and i see we're projecting once again

>>6262505
Stop samefagging, skinnyfat.

>>6262515
talk to a psychiatrist about your body dysmorphia

>>6262520
>>>/fit/

>>6262524
maybe you should go back there, since it's clearly your home board

>>6262530
No, seriously. They'll help you put on some muscle mass, so your friends and family stop mistaking you for a girl.

ITT: mfa comes to /fa/ and gets mad that we're not like them

>>6262536
nobody mistakes me for a girl, where are you pulling all of these wrong ideas about me from?
personal experience?

>>6262541
mfa and /fa/ are the same 16yo ninjas though

>>6262554
That's the first proper pair of trousers you've posted.

Oh and your mom told me about all your issues. How you used to get teased about being gay and all. I'm gay too I just had a father who taught me how to wear pants properly.

I've been contemplating buying a really high-waist pant (maybe even slight paperbag waist) with a full, but totally straight leg, that maybe pools a little at my ankle. I've seen some silhouettes from Pugh, but I never like how his fabric choices wear on me. Any suggestions? Probably in black. I've considered Astaires, but have yet to try any one.

>>6262566
those look nothing like any of the garbage bag-esque fits you've posted
baggy pants and "your mom" jokes? are you in 8th grade?

>>6262571
You might as well buy a dress, or a nice skirt.

>>6262577
>"your mom" jokes?

>jokes

I don't joke about people's moms.

Yours was very lovely. Amazing how such a pleb-dressing faggot came out of that lovely woman.

>>6262591
so, that's a yes?

What is masculine about baggy trousers? If that's your thing, it's whatever...but there's nothing that's masculine or gentlemanly about it. A man from 1919 would probably think it looked like shit.

>>6262566
Ugh. A leather jacket!? Those things look awful. Leather jackets never look good. He might as well have worn a duster coat. It just looks silly like a costume. No one could take this outfit silly because of that leather jacket. Leather jackets always look like shit.

>>6262577
Source of the sweater?

>>6262598
Yes to what? Are you a pleb? Yes.

>>6262598
I heard a nerd say a your mom joke last semester in my phys101 class nearly died of second-hand cringe

>>6262603
>admitting you're a pleb

>>6262594
Show me a "skinny suit" that doesn't make the wearer look like a 12yo.

>>6262599
either raf simons or jil sander (don't remember which)
>>6262596
don't even start this shit

>>6262609
you know that a suit doesn't have to be skinny to not fit like a tent, right

>>6262609
It doesn't exist.

>>6262582
>ask for pant
>suggests skirt
>nice

>>6262611
Just admit that leather jackets look awful. You cannot take a person in a leather jacket seriously. Leather jackets look goofy, douchey, and tryhard. No one looks good in a leather jacket.

Do you know why those guys in the pic you posted look good? It's because they aren't wearing leather jackets.

>>6262621
Did you seriously just post pleated pants as a rebuttal to... anything?

>>6262629
do you think that just because someone said so in an infograph that pleats are the devil? you're really grasping at straws now

>>6262629

Why can't you fucking people handle fucking difference. There's a big difference between not liking something and it being objectively bad. People who can't tell the difference are fucking morons.

There's nothing wrong with pleated pants. I don't wear them, but they look fine in the right context.

>>6262609

Enjoy.

>>6262671

God damn. Those fits.

>>6262387
>tfw you will never wear his thighs as earmuffs

>>6262671
>2nd from the left
>dat fit
If only I had that silhouette and tiny feet

Has anyone here even heard of yohji?

>>6265869

Waist seam coats are boss as a motherfucker. Best sportswear jacket, easily. Maybe they'll make a come back. Tailors will make them still, at least.

i looked up the label op is posting, port 1961 or something, it's hokey shit, really awful stuff.

otoh baggy trou r were its at imo
#comfyninja

>skinny trousers
>baggy trousers
>trousers

>>6262555
says you ur mad bra ahah
>ikek

>>6262628
but they don't look gd haha

Hey, faggots.

Slim/fit/ masterrace here.

You always go slim to show off those juicy manly thighs. Skinny is for twig faggots. Baggy is for fat old cunts

>>6262598
sauce on blazer? reverse image gets me canada goose shit....
also, are those pants jeans, chinos or what?

>>6265970

This, pretty much. Slim is best. Not too skinny, definetely not baggy.

|--------------------------|----------|
Baggy Slim Skinny

>>6265974

That's technically a dinner jacket. Looks like a cheap one though.

Just so you know, odd (seperate) "suit" jackets are not called blazers. The correct term is sport coat, unless they're navy with brass buttons, then they're a blazer.

>>6265974

Why don't you just look on the Mr. Porter website.

>>6266003

Yeah, it's probably not very cheap.

>>6262629
What's wrong with pleated pants?

They go well with a well tailored suit.

And I mean a slim fit.

No not skinny, no not loose. No not regular.

SLIM

Only for /fit/bros only.

>>6266009

I know it isn't cheap. I said it looked cheap because it's got that extra trendy skinny fit thing going on. It looks like it belongs on Mr. Porter, so it's clearly not inexpensive.

I'm not a proponent of baggy fit. I like my stuff really snug and slim, but there is such a thing as being too small and too short.

>>6266010

Slim isn't just for people who are /fit/...

It's just a step above skinny.

>>6266010

There is nothing wrong with a pleated pant or a skinny suit.

Just apply good taste and a good eye for fit and proportion and decide what works for you and what look you're trying to achieve. Not everyone wants to look the same, nor should they.

>>6266026

I think there is something such as being too small if something fits smaller than you intend, but if you want your suits shrunken, hey, go for it. I think it's silly that the majority of this thread has been people who like to dress one way trying to convince people who like to dress a different way that they're right and the other group is wrong.

Who cares how other people wear their stuff? Just wear what works on your body and creates the silhouette and feel that you want.

>>6262622
>>6262622
>>6262622
>>6262622
This is a perfect fitting suit, everything else ITT is either too skinny or too baggy

>>6266041

True. Just my opinion. With /fa/'s fucked up uniform mentality, I'm all for people doing what they want even if I don't like it. The variety is a good thing.

This is how I like my trousers to fit, I really don't care for anything baggier

>>6266003
interesting, I did know about the metal buttons making it a blazer, so what about the silk collar? is it still a sportcoat? or would it be a tux blazer?
also, does it really matter?
>>6266009
thanks, will do

>>6266066

But I will stand by the fact that it does impede functionality. If it's so tight your buttons are being stressed loose and it's binding everywhere. But like you said, if you wanted a shrunken fit for some reason, that's cool I guess.

>>6266075

Well that jacket seems to have silk faced buttons, like a dinner (tux) jacket ought to. The silk faced shawl lapel is also consistent with making it a dinner jacket.

Technically a blazer is a jacket that has metal buttons and is part of a uniform of sorts. Most commonly this is a boating or naval navy jacket with brass buttons, but it can also be a school uniform. That jacket in the picture is just a dinner jacket though. Not a hybrid of any sort.

And yes, it does matter. No reason not to call things by their proper names. And usually the classification is a way of dictating what you ought to wear with it. Sport coats should generally be worn with other odd pieces and separates, although jackets from suits made of coarser materials can double as a sport coat.

>>6266075

A dinner jacket traditionally features silk-trimmed lapels (shawl and peak are most common) and often have a single (covered) button front.

In the strictest sense, "blazer" is a single- or double-breasted navy wool jacket with gold-tone shank buttons. In practice, most people refer to tailored non-suit jackets as "blazers".

>>6266074

the rise is wack m8

>>6266108

The button is covered, not faced, as a button can't be faced.

>>6266108
so would this be a blazer or a tux jacket?
woul I look a douche wearing pic related to a semi formal event?

>>6266132

It's a take on a dinner jacket, yes.

>>6266117

This is accurate. Though they really shouldn't do that, because sport coat would be the proper term in most cases.

Out in the real world, I generally don't correct people though. I just use the term sport coat instead, and often people will pick up on it and start using it instead.

And as I was saying before, the dinner jacket posted earlier has an extremely "trendy" fit. You can wear it if you want of course, but more extreme fits like that tend to have a shorter life span. And despite it being a dinner jacket, the fit lends itself to suggesting wear outside of black tie, both because of the fit and because it's being sold as a separate.

If you've got the cash to blow and you really, really, like it, go for it I guess. But you might find its uses a bit limited.

>>6266125

What's wrong with the rise? Don't even start to say that it's too high.

>>6262596
this thread is so stupid i'm actually happy to see you

>>6266130

Right. That would be a misnomer. A little picky of you to point out, but true nonetheless.

>>6266132

That would be someone having some fun with the idea of a dinner jacket. It looks like they've taken some inspiration from very traditional British formal clothing and uniforms and applied it to a dinner jacket foundation.

Is it the safest thing to try to pull off? No. But it's perfectly possible and could look really good if you have the chops. If you're having to ask though, I wouldn't recommend trying just yet. Once you're more confident and have a better understanding of how to play with clothing at formal events, go for it.

>>6266132
semi formal, probably

wear it to a club or something

>>6266179
>A little picky of you to point out

From the dude who makes a point of explaining why he only uses the word "sport coat".

>>6266179

To add to this, >>6266178 has the right idea. It would work best at a club, lounge, or a cocktail party. I think it could look great if it's pulled off correctly. Just be careful as it's pretty adventurous and could be blundered easily.

>>6266200

Don't get mad. I'm being picky too. I said you were right, now relax.