/fa/ - Fashion

can't be a patrician with out the plebeians

>>6253052
Is that miffy? He has the same rings going on

>>6253060
No miffy is a chubby guy

>inb4 he comes in here telling me I'm a dumb cunt and gets really defensive

I like the fit of the denim on the right though, jap steeetwear af. w2c?

>>6253075
>dad straight, graphic, stone washed jeans
lel

this looks passable because of the depth of field and composition

if one of these plens took a mirror photo with their iphone they would get ripped

instead it's advanced menswear because some street style fuccboi with his first 5D used autofocus

How do you know what they think?

why do people buy all these gay colored chucks thinking they will stand out from the crowd. no, sorry, you are still wearing converse.

>>6253098

I can't imagine someone leaving their house thinking "I will try to be as unfashionable today as possible." Unless you are a hel-style level hipster.

>>6253121
Most people don't consider whether they are fashionable or not. Or if they do, they are aware they they aren't particularly fashionable regardless of what they are trying to achieve.

Those guys in the pic do look like they are trying though.

>>6253129

>Most people don't consider whether they are fashionable or not

Nah I think everyone wants to look good. Even fatties you see going around in skinny jeans because they know it's the trend. I do think everyone is trying, but most people have shit color coordination from lack of experience mostly, and furthermore they don't realize how important a good fit is.

>>6253138
sorry mate but some people dont give a shit.

>tfw people think this is /fa/

>>6253158
lol dadcore is the white equivalent of swag

Call me back when you can afford Visvim turbonerd.
You scrubs don't know shit about fashion.

>>6253074
u wudnt look at him and call him chubby

>>6253232
What is Visvim considered? Menswear with a fresh twist?

>>6253273
expensive japanese workwear

(streetwear)

>>6253273
Visvim transcends fashion, it's a lifestyle brand. Hiroki's lifestyle.
But in all honesty, it's heritage outdoorswear with a strong influence from Techwear, japanese outdoorswear/workwear influenced streetwear like white mountaineering and engineered garments, heritage menswear and heritage workwear, and a large amount of influence from various cultures, in particular native american indian and japanese culture.
Just stick to "perfection".

>>6253288
u 4got about subjectivity

>>6253294
You forgot about having good taste, so we're even.

>>6253279
>>6253288
Hmmm, where to start? Currently have the typical snug button up w/ tight denim and chukkas going on. 6'3" 150 I might add, can I even integrate into Japanese targeted clothing?

>>6253297
wOoOoOow bang bang

>>6253288

>just stick to perfection

oh my fucking god shut up. listen to yourself you fucking faggot

>>6253302
ye m8, just look at their lookbooks. they use tall whiteys for everything.

visvim is a good mix of relaxed and tighter fits, pre universal tbh.

i kinda feel like you need to really jump and go full visvim to look great tho

>>6253303
I don't see why you're trying to use "faggot" as pejorative on a fashion board, I see that as nothing but a compliment.
>>6253302
The Visvim lookbook really do offer some fantastic fit, Sune who models for Tres Bien also shows off some fantastic fits for taller guys as he's 6"2
http://tres-bien.com/brand/visvim/
As for first purchases, I only own one piece of Visvim at the moment, but it's the same style I'd recommend to you: a pair of boots. A good pair of Visvim goodyear welted boots are fantastic value for money and will last you an inordinate amount of time. Outerwear is a great bet as well, especially a kilgore or a 101 jacket. Happy travels!

Keep an eye out
http://supertalk.superfuture.com/index.php/topic/141476-visvim-community-sale-thread/

>>6253324

how can you be dickriding this much yet only own 1 piece

that is completely moronic

>>6253324
yo, hiroki dont be a fuccboi son
why you make everything so expensive, why?

>>6253331
>>6253332
pretty much these 2.

visvim is sick, but outside of jp mark up is fucking ridiculous

>>6253331
>dickriding
Confirmed for being a YouTube commenter.

>>6253324
i dont get it. why is visvim apparently only known for being an expensive clothing line? there are plenty of other more expensive brands out there, its not the same par as any premium jap brands like monitaly or nanamica but visvim is almost always considered 'better' for some reason

>>6253339
sorry meant *its ON the same par as any premium jap brands

>>6253331
Wow, so because I don't own a single Rothko piece, I can't think he's a good artist? You've sure shown me anon, thanks, better go re-evaluate my entire life.
>>6253335
Cop 2nd-hand off sufu or Yahoo Japan auctions, it's not rocket science, you get it around 30% cheaper. Also, you know Visvim now ships almost everywhere from its webstore now, even though the range is quite small, right?

>>6253339
See >>6253288
Monitaly is really yuki's pet project based around heritage outdoorswear while Nanamica are smart takes on a more prep/heritage look, but Visvim culminates so many different influences and creates such a fantastic product that it stands above the pack of other Japanese streetwear mavericks. It's a case where spreading yourself relatively thin can be a good thing.

>>6253343

wow, you are stupid

this is fashion, not fine art. garments have to be handled, worn etc to be fully appreciated, especially when it comes to this one - that you're drooling all over. calling the brand 'perfect' and waxing lyrical when you own 1 pair of shoes is retarded

>>6253355
There are these things call boutiques that stock clothing for sale and you can try them but you're not necessarily obligated to buy them, you should try walking into one sometime. I mean, for me, a Visvim Flagship is like 4 hours drive away.

>>6253355
Not even that anon, but you are now not allowed to like any female, or male you faggot, who you've never talked to or had physical interaction with.

>>6253158
In the appropriate situation, this is /fa/. why not?

>>6253046
Those shoes make me feel sick and the the guys jeans on the right are ugly as fuck.
Middle guy isn't half bad.

Who the fuck said they were /fa/?

>>6253432

Shoes are way too long and pointy, his coloured socks don't match the rest of his outfit. Shirt's too busy for that blazer. Overall sloppy (shirt too far open, pocket square messy)

>>6253355
>>6253355
You're working against yourself here, which is sort of inevitable when you're trying to argue that no one can have an opinion on a clothing line they don't own. How many people on /fa/ are usually dressed in Raf Simons Rick Owens? Shit, how many professional fashion critics do you think have racks of Rick sitting in their closet? The show is considered an acceptable form of presentation of clothing.

Paintings, on the other hand... look, I'm a big proponent of the electronic image, but for all it can do and all the awesomeness of mechanical reproduction for mechanical process art, looking at even an appropriately sized, top quality repro print of a painting isn't the same. But what you're willing to cede to him is that a physical experience of a Rothko is irrelevant, while still maintaining you absolutely have to have a closet stuffed with Visvim?

For the record, guys, I've got a Rothko on all six surfaces of my bedroom, Raf Simons Rick Owens usually what I'm dressed in, but with Visvim boots and a T&A oxford underneath, and two Patek Phillipes over the jacket sleeve on each wrist. Three are set to GMT, because I am a globetrotter, but one is set for Paris, because Paris has my heart and contains my true foursome loves Rick and Michele, and Karl, natch.

Oh, and jacket's stuffed with fake passports, handbound sole editions of limited run books, and sandwiches made on Poilane slices with the crust cut off by my valet Lionel. SO I KNOW MY SHIT.

Come the fuck on.