/fa/ - Fashion

my uni does have a uni

indifferent
tbh prob make life easier
>make up
>throw on shitty uniform
>go do uni shit
>come home
>comf out in gn

My university is fucking huge so that'd be so impractical that I can't even imagine it

i'd transfer to a better university that wasn't so retarded

also i'd probably sue the fuck out of them for whatever possible and spend it on clothes to wear at my new university

>not wearing uniform in a /fa/ way
its like you all hate fun

>>6234545
>implying a uniform wouldn't be /fa/ as fuck

i would probably drop out, because muh freedoms

there should be at least a smart-casual style dress code, to prepare some of these little dipshits i see around my uni for the fucking real world.

guys rocking up to class, clearly have not showered, some not wearing fucking shoes, in fucking TRACK PANTS, AT 10 IN THE FUCKING MORNING

GET IT TOGETHER YOU LAZY LITTLE SLOBS

and girls think its hot because YOLO THEY DONT GIVE A FUCK LOL

I WANT TO KILL EVERYONE

>>6234605
Those aren't uniforms.

And I think people who like uniforms just enjoy them to be dadcore with an excuse

>>6234623
They're not, but my ideal uniform would be dadcore as depicted in these images

>>6234628
then ur a fag

>>6234516
>slutshaming
>2013
I bet you've never even stuck it in
(except for maybe in ur mums puffy cunt)

ive literally always loved school girl uniforms with the black pleated skirts and boring white blouses
like since i was in elementary school idk whats wrong with me
i'd be elated if i was forced to wear that every day

>tfw you will never go to highschool in japan
and fuck qt girls in japanese uniforms

>>6234516
>implying I don't remember all the cameltoes I saw around campus for a no porn fap

>>6234642
>slut shaming being a thing
And I bet three niggers are sticking it in you right this very moment.

>>6234662
reported for racism

>>6234665
Ad hominem for ad hominem. You can't blame society for your being a slut.

>>6234665

>>6234669
who the fuck is blaming society for being sluts?

>uni
That board inhabitants never cease to amuse me.

why has /fa/ gotten so /b/tier lately. way too much 'faggot' and 'nigger'. It's not funny but it is awfully edgy.

>>6234648
I know that feel

I love pleated skirts and blouses/sailor collars with a sweater or cardigan over top and a ribbon/cross tie/colonel tie

if I could, I'd wear that shit every day
but I am 20 and don't want to be asked if I'm cosplaying/what school I'm from

I wish these things weren't associated with school uniforms

>>6234682
>tfw no gf who dresses in school uniform

>>6234672
>>6234642 was. In the OP, I said that uniforms would mostly eliminate girls wearing slutty clothing. That might be seen as a pro for some. And yet she immediately jumps to calling it "slut shaming" and personal insults

>>6234682
we need to strategize on how to make a reasonably adult version of those uniforms
surely some designer has executed them in some new inventive way that would make it seem less like cosplay or like i'm actually a school girl right ???
now how to search for this...

>>6234687
bet you could convince any gf into dressing in one for you though
tamest "fetish" ever

>>6234697
>she
nah i'm a bloke
i'm saying it's rude to refer to girls as sluts just for wearing clothes that show skin
calling someone a slut is never a "pro", you shouldn't objectify women m8

>>6234698
http://www.barneys.com/Thom-Browne-School-Uniform-Skirt/501640409,default,pd.html
sold out but u get the idea

Browne/Margiela/Dior/any big name designer/ navy blazer and white shirt only thing required.

>>6234698
I bought a cotton sailor collared shirt not too long ago and wore it with a loose sweater and some jean short shorts+thigh highs, seemed okish

Tried with a skirt instead a few days later and while she meant it as a compliment through mutual like of sailor collars, said she loved my 'seifuku cosplay'

>>6234704

>>6234711
i dunno why you guys think it's such a haha joke to post this
he's v cute

>>6234704
>http://www.barneys.com/Thom-Browne-School-Uniform-Skirt/501640409,default,pd.html
The styling looks rather frumpy though

>>6234687
>tfw female who wears it
>tfw bf and society look at me weird

shouldnt be identifying as female on /fa/ so early in the morning

>>6234712
he looks p bad

>>6234718
nah he don't, really handsome and charming imo
how did ppl get the pic?

>>6234715
yeah barneys cant style for shit but oh well it's thommy

>>6234708
There's nothing inherently wrong with wearing "slutty" clothing, but in some cases it reflects on an attitude that most people don't find respectable. A uniform would equalize everyone, at least in the aesthetic aspect.

>>6234719
he doesn't look handsome and charming is not a physical attribute

>>6234722
the fact that you are referring to it as slutty is what is offensive
because you are negatively categorising a woman based on the fact that you assume her clothes mean that she has had sex with more people than you deem appropriate

>>6234704
that skirts pretty damn cute but holy shit does that sweater ruin it

>>6234710
pix
i have such a hard time w/ thigh highs because i love them but i think they almsot always look like bedroom accessories u kno :/ i wanna see them rocked

>>6234722
have u ever seen a girl in school uniform tho
some of these hoes p. much have they booty hanging out

>>6234737

where have u been nerd

>>6234536
turnleft confirmed for wearing makeup

now we know what's under that black circle

>>6234730

not him but "slutty" was in inverted commas, i'm assuming that means he doesn't necessarily agree with the term

>>6234730
It'd be offensive if it were wrong (and one will inevitably be wrong at least sometimes). But I'm not going around telling people they're sluts.
>more people than you deem appropriate
I'm no prude. Premarital sex doesn't make someone a whore. There's nothing wrong with dating a non-vigin. My views of what counts as "overly sexually promiscuous" is pretty much the same as what society's is.

>>6234737
The fact that it's a uniform would neutralize it. If she wants to hike her skirt up, so what. You can't do much with a uniform.

>>6234752
What's wrong with having sex with lots of people?
you sound prude af no offense

>>6234730
It'd be offensive if it were wrong. Sometimes it is, sometimes it isn't. But I'm not going around telling people they're sluts.
>more people than you deem appropriate
I'm no prude. Premarital sex doesn't make someone a whore. There's nothing wrong with dating a non-vigin. My views of what counts as slutty (overly sexually promiscuous) is pretty much the same as what society's is.

>>6234737
The fact that it's a uniform would neutralize it. If she wants to hike her skirt up, so what. You can't do much with a uniform.

>>6234759
>>6234752
weak delete game bro

>>6234756
Why should you even care what I think?
Your vagina is one of the most valuable, personal things you can give to someone. If you'd give it to someone after one night or to a hot guy when you're drunk enough, then well, you're a slut. If you don't respect your body, then why should others respect you?

>>6234767
>Your vagina is one of the most valuable, personal things you can give to someone
lol
enjoying sex doesn't mean you don't respect your body
you're sounding major virgin right now

>>6234767
>Your vagina is one of the most valuable, personal things you can give to someone

lol this is such horseshit what a stupid thing to say

>>6234767
>all this assburger

>>6234763
Delete and repost in lieu of editing

>>6234769
>implying that everyone who enjoys sex also has to be promiscuous

>>6234771
If you don't believe it means anything, then act accordingly. I don't see why you're so up in a fuss about hearing a different opinion.

>>6234735
Not how I wear it, but this is it tucked/untucked of the shirt

was taking photos just of things that I ordered online.

Thigh highs I find work best when the top half is covered up and conservative. If I had photos of my outfits I'd post some examples of whatI do.

>>6234767
>Your vagina is one of the most valuable, personal things you can give to someone

one of the most autistic things I've read in a while

>>6234767
I know some niggas put pussy on a pedal stool but this is ridic

>>6234788
>>6234771
>>6234769
most funny part? thats what society ACTUALLY thinks

and you guys thinking the dark ages were far behind us

>>6234778
>implying that everyone who enjoys sex also has to be promiscuous
The only difference is in the connotations of the words. Being promiscuous is enjoying sex in the way that person wants to.
I'm in a fuss because your attitude shames women for having as much sex as they want to, with no focus on men. Isn't a penis the most valuable, personal thing you can give to someone also?
You also have the tone of a shit version of poet.

>>6234767
>he believes humans are monogamous by nature!
>he doesn't understand why his parents are divorced!

>>6234795
society doesnt thinks that u massive neckbeard, problably you liive in kentuchy or some shithole like that

>>6234767

fucking lol. what a virgin.

maybe one day, when you actually become a *real* adult, you'll understand that real self-worth comes from not basing one's self-value on the pleasure of others, but by being content with your own desires.

goodluck/10 and I'm sorry that your dick is small.

I'd be happy. I like uniforms. Also, wouldn't have to look at all the autists wearing autist clothes.

/fa/ I just came here 6 months ago pls tell me this isn't full of virgins like>>6234767

>>6234767
>Your vagina is one of the most valuable, personal things you can give to someone

>>6234800
I don't ever recall endorsing it either way. It's a double standard, and men who do the same thing are just as disrespectful. I don't believe that the penis has as much *value* as the vagina does, seeing as women have more control over this whole sexual exchange.

>>6234767
screencapped

>>6234815

ugh it sort of is, which is why i'm spending a decreasing amount of time here. don't get me wrong, I've read some genuinely beautiful and thought-provoking posts, but they're eclipsed by the >tfwnogf threads, permavirgins, and insecure 16-year-old manbitches that think wearing $1500 ricks entitles them to pussy.

>>6234817
>I don't believe that the penis has as much *value* as the vagina does
Because you've never touched one?

>>6234800
Not the guy you're replying to, and I agree with you, but it's also about HOW they're having sex. I have no qualms with people having a lot of sex, but it's not the safest method when you're going to the bar to pick up some random person, male or female. I don't think they're 'sluts', I just wouldn't advocate people I know doing it.

>>6234817
> I don't believe that the penis has as much *value* as the vagina

>>6234808
I'm actually not a virgin. I still don't see what all the fuss is about. I have a right to my own opinion, as does everyone else. This whole debate is pointless, because I'm not gonna change what I think and neither will you.

>>6234817

>women have more control over this whole sexual exchange

you realize that this is no longer anno domini 1200 and we now can control birth/don't live in community-centric societies, right?

fucking smh move back to afghanistan

>>6234832
this debate is pointless because you are a fucking pleb

>>6234795
lol society doesn't think that. Old, religious, conservative people think that. Maybe you're from some backwards place where those kind of people are the majority, but in the civilised world no-one gives a shit what a women does with an orifice that excretes blood and all kinds of bodily fluids.

>>6234826
>Only having sex in the missionary position with the sole purpose of procreation

I hate you man
I wish you ill

>>6234834
What are you even talking about? I mean that, if a woman wanted to get laid, she'd probably have a much easier time than a guy. Locks don't go flocking to keys.

>>6234782
ohhh that's pretty understated especially with a slightly longer skirt
i like this a lot, especially untucked! thanks for posting

>>6234840
>being so pleb you have a hard time getting pussy
go here http://www.love-shy.com/ and leave forever

>>6234817
>I don't believe that the penis has as much *value* as the vagina does

haha you couldn't make this shit up. You may be entitled to your opinion, but your opinion is absolutely laughable.

someone screencap this for the beta threads

>>6234840

what I mean is, the whole issue regarding 'control' isn't a problem anymore, since the REASONS that women, biologically speaking, require 'control' aren't relevant anymore. since people can fuck without consequence, it's archaic to still see sex as a "women as gatekeepers" sort of exchange.

and fuck your stupid lock and key bullshit.

>>6234840
holy shit man go back to reddit your bullshit misogyny is so tired and embarrassing i feel bad for you

>>6234843
Really? Untucked looks shapeless. Tucked flatters her more.

>>6234840
Its like you hate having fun

>>6234861
she's small in general though i think it looks cool and breezy and since her legs are free i like the shape it generates
it could also be partially because i don't like the waist of the skirt though
i think petitite people with small chests don't really have to jump to immediate cinching of the waist like other people who become shapeless blobs because they have large breasts or hips or whatever

>>6234861
yes, untucked was just to show off what it looks like on it's own, I wear it tucked

>>6234832
What's the point in posting your opinion if you don't want to generate discussion? What difference would it make if you just kept it to yourself if you don't care what others think?

You're an imbecile if just want to flop out your opinion like a limp dick and have everyone stare at it in awe. That's not what 4chan is about, nor is it what common human interaction is about. All you'd appreciate is affirmation that other people think the way you do or everyone simply reading your post and moving on. With the first, you're a close minded simpleton and with the latter, there's no reason to even post if you don't want to generate discussion.

The discussion isn't pointless, but your posts are. Like I said, why even post if you're not open minded enough to legitimately engage another poster who might challenge your beliefs. Pathetic.

>>6234855
It's not like I think sex should be solely for procreation. I can't help but imagine that the exchange is fundamentally different because of biology. Wouldn't there be more woman-on-man rapes (or at least it'd be less lopsided) if the whole "gatekeepers" thing was completely irrelevant?

>>6234881
I've been engaging with everyone so far, you fuck. You can see that I'm at least making an effort to be logical. I wouldn't still be here bothering to reply if I were THAT close-minded.

>>6234887
That's much less due to any physical limitations than it is due to societal gender power dynamics

>>6234894
> societal gender power dynamics
I don't know if you just made that up, but obviously, a lot of our society is firmly rooted in biology. For example, we're just barely moving away from the "hunter-gatherer" model for males and females. In the same way, I feel that the "woman as gatekeeper" thing is physical, which gives way to societal.

>>6234892
Then why'd you make the post about the discussion being pointless? Why'd you spew the banal platitude about everyone is entitled to their own opinion including you, 'so be quiet!'? You're a fickle idiot.

eh wore uniform all my schooling years (tapered and cropped the pants in high school) wouldnt be bad,but uniform ain an interior design class would be stupid tho

>>6234887
You're right in part. Women are generally choosier than men and aren't likely to get away from the biological drive to select the best they can get regardless of birth control. Their instinct is telling them they can't risk devoting resources to flighty males. It's sexual competition; a conflict of interest. Males definitely benefit from fucking every woman in sight and letting them deal with the offspring to make more time for fucking, but women obviously won't benefit reproductively from fucking every male they see when it takes years to raise offspring.

You can't get away from that, but society plays its role too. Chemical birth control probably reprograms women enough to modify normal reproductive behavior. Conscious knowledge that you won't get pregnant also modifies behavior. There's a shitload of factors that change over time, but, historically, humans are polygamous as fuck.

>>6234906
It is out of frustration. It started out as everyone against me, but now that all the h8rs are gone and I'm only talking to one or two people, constructive discussion is actually possible. Obviously, you're not one of those, so keep the insults coming

>>6234916
Yeah, but biology is all geared around monogamy. Paternity uncertainty, y'know. The penis is mushroom shaped in order to scoop out other partners' semen when you pull out. So I'm inclined to believe that society still sets a great store by monogamy.

>>6234906
Oh, and since we're playing the insults game
>banal platitude
Banal, meaningless, trite platitudes! Pleonasms for everyone! I can use big words too.

>>6234898
>obviously
Why? It used to be, that's for sure.

>hunter gatherer
If something was prevalent before does that make it right?

>Physical
While the biological desire for men to pump as many women with their seed as possible, and women to accept only a single man to copulate with them at one time (due to gestation period) to continue your lineage is still there, the reasons based on circumstance are not. Nor have they been for quite a while, with only societal pressure fueling this sentiment.

>>6234939
Maybe it's a big word for you kid, not everyone has your worldview though.

>>6234941
>If something was prevalent before does that make it right?
No, but the hunter-gatherer thing is an example of how closely relayed biology and society are. And even thousands of years later, we just barely started moving away. Old habits die hard.

>with only societal pressure fueling this sentiment.
So what exactly is your stance? Is polygamy okay, or is it the true norm? Or is it something that should be abided and not looked down upon?

>>6234931
It isn't. Hunter-gatherers and ancestor species all displayed trends towards male-dominated, polygamous societies. Most of our great ape relatives like gorillas and chimpanzees are polygamous (though we may have all descended from one that was monogamous).

Monogamy is the result of agriculture and the societies that built up around that. It's more cultural evolution that biological, which is always more plastic and transient. We still tend towards polygamy to increase the amount of offspring or the quality of offspring we have (e.g. divorce, cheating, mistresses, etc.) in line with our biological history.

I would dress preppy because I'm handsome and fit problem is it won't look good on many people and I understand that.

Just as skinny jeans etc. dont look good on me.

>>6235018
Gah, sorry, not polygamous. I mean polygynous.

get off of /fa/, none of this is fashion related. It was funny when the autist was spewing hilarious sentences but it's just a little sad now.

>>6234516
Once my School wanted to create a uniform...
with sweatpants and sweatshirts. Glad all the student resisted.

>>6235027
Yes, but the polygamy is only for males to enjoy, not females. Society still seems to endorse that view, as do I (with a slight modification; I reject that double standard). I still believe that sex is something very significant, and not to be treated like water. It's fine if a girl has had sex with lots of men because they were all boyfriends/ flings, but random bar/ party hookups is where I'd draw the line.

>>6235027
This explains it better than I could ever: http://public.wsu.edu/~rquinlan/polygyny.htm

You can call our mating system limited/punctuated monogamy with variation.

>no goofnigger
>con

>No more hot girls wearing slutty clothes, yoga pants
>Everyone is equalized in terms of fashion
>I can't wear anything cool

Sounds like a shitty deal

>>6234916
Actually, both genders have that thing where you are more attracted to novelty partners rather than long term. Not what you were getting at, I know, but just thought I'd throw it out there. Women have reasons to fuck different people too.

>>6234805
>>6234838
Good thing it's not like that where you guys live. In 3rd world land, women still get shamed to hell and back for a one night stand or fucking her bf before like 6 months into the relationship or other equally stupid shit.

Not a redneck uncivilized tv and intenet-less 3rd world country either, we have big cities here.

Uniforms are fucking awful. Not being able to express yourself through clothing is an awful thing.

Fuck high school for having uniforms