/fa/ - Fashion

http://shop-at.lacoste.com/Rene%20Crafted/725STM1017,de_AT,pd.html
these?

cop or not? theyre sold out but i know a place that has them in my size

>>6195834
nah, you don't want the lacoste logo on ur feet and the're pretty ugly

2/2

if the niggers at Clae would ever restock any size other than fucking 7

>>6195839
the material makes those look pretty cheap in the picture

1/2

>>6195843
you can barely see the logo tho

>>6195849
okay but better nbs out around

>>6195854
disgusting

>>6195860
even so

>>6195846
No

http://shop.vans.com/catalog/Vans/en_US/category/men/shoes/classics.html

which one of the patterened ones should i buy?

>>6195877
none of them

>>6195877
if you have to, then:http://shop.vans.com/catalog/Vans/en_US/style/scq7ss.html?vcategoryId=PDPZ1&cm_vc=PDPZ1&cm_sp=IO-_-PDPZ1-_-SCQ7SS

gonna cop some y3s, which ones u reckon
bottom left or bottom right would be my choice prolly

>>6195849

these are the most heinous new balances i've ever seen, which is impressive since everything they put out looks like absolute garbage.

>>6195839
no
>>6195846
no
>>6195849
meh
>>6195854
no
>>6195865
sole looks really thick. Maybe it's my perspective
>>6195877
Go with the Lo Pro

>>6195890
bottom right or bottom center

http://www.urbanoutfitters.com/urban/catalog/productdetail.jsp?id=26213017

What about these? I am just trying to figure out what colors would go well with them. I am thinking jeans would look terrible with these. SO lowcut-socks + these and shorts (all light colors)

>>6195970
these are horrible

>>6195970
those look like booty

>>6195834
should i do it?

>>6195970
those look bad

>>6196028
i am really disliking that color combination

Should I? CDB's are 2uncomy4me

>>6196031

Doesn't anybody sperry?

>>6196063
name of that model? I dig that look.

Cop if you don't care what people on this website think

>>6196063


These look pretty ok. I was looking for boat shos, but they were either too "hip" or looked like granpa shoes.
Got any other suggestions?

>>6196078
>>6196081
I got some a couple weeks ago, only thing is they're really light when you get them and it takes a couple weeks before they start to look a little faded, which is better

Anyone know any footwear blogs, in particular Nike?

>>6196108
high snobiety has a decent sneaker section imo

is it just me or is this really dope in an ugly way

>>6196202

>>6196089

my dad has these shoes

>>6196207
yeah I'd rock it, you'd need to be hella skinny tho

>>6195929
eh

>>6196218
why is that? I'm very thin though so I'll probably cop

Have posted 5 times already but I really do appreciate feedback from you guys.

B-day next week, will probably be copping a lot of shit once I get bday money.

What you think of these? Bought black iron rangers but didn't quite like them, think this might be a more /fa/ alternative.

>>6196279
and most iffy on these thorogoods, anyone got pics of people pulling these off? Do like them but maybe I should buy something better for 100 more bucks?


Only interested in its aesthetic not quality

>>6196266
because it'd just look like shit on you

go for it tho man

Bought these yesterday for the summer.

which one

>>6196467
u better be muscular

>>6196455
lol, 2 of my pleb m8's wear them

>>6196467
5 or 6

>>6196279

woah what is that green stuff on the sole, looks nasty

>>6195849
I like them but I haven't seen them in person or on my own feet. I was thinking about copping some for myself.

HOW BOUT THIS can only ship to my home and going home this weekend, so need a quick answer.

>>6196484
how muscular we talkin?

>>6196467

definitely 2

>>6196478

your m80's are awesome. and the shoes are comfy as fuck.

>>6196497
idk i'd go for something brighter for summer like this maybe

>>6196504
ottermode, preferably

>>6196497
Cop

>>6196467
4 and 6

>>6196063
Cop

>>6196536
tan

Black, tan, or no cop? Looking for some flats/sandals for this summer. I already have basic black canvas flats.

>>6196516
damn that's kinda bright. I just wanted some red/cream color. I'll check out the brand though.

>>6196545
they have some more "subtle" ones but they're mostly pretty loud

>>6196501
not sure what it is, maybe crepe.


Cop or not?

>>6196039
look like shit.

http://www.thebay.com/eng/mens-shoes-musthaves-theretrorunner-420_CLASSICS-thebay/295031
or
http://www.thebay.com/eng/mens-shoes-musthaves-theretrorunner-420_CLASSICS_-thebay/315036

Should I?

zara com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/product/se/en/zara-seu-S2013/358057/1121070/SHOE+WITH+CONTRASTING+BUCKLES

>>6196031
>>6196089
>>6195849
y

I fucking love these but i cant find them anywhere pls help

>>6196289

I have these. They're really good. When I wear them I pinroll my pants so that they taper into the boots

Pic related is how I wear them

http://www.fredperry.com/media/catalog/product/cache/1/1/460x550/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/B/2/B2144_100_1.JPG
Ordered these, was gonna get Vans but... eh, Vans shop was full of tweens.

I know they're considered MFA-tier by the goobniggers here, but I really want a boot that won't look too tryhard or too expensive.

>>6195839
Yes
>>6195846
No
>>6195849
Hell no
>>6195854
No
>>6195865
No
>>6195970
Yes
>>6196031
Yes
>>6196039
No
>>6196063
Yes
>>6196089
No for fucks sake. Are you 10 years old?
>>6196279
Looks like good boots, but not my style.
>>6196289
Looks like good boots, but not my style.
>>6196455
No
>>6196913
No
>>6197460
No
>>6197472
No

>>6197548
post fit fuccboi

>>6197542
i'll sell you my size10 cdbs for like $40 + shipping

>>6197597
Not my size m8

Should I cop these katahdin boots or a pair of cdbs? Going to univ in a colder place next year so I was kinda leaning on the boots a bit more, but then again I kinda wanna get a good pair of chukkas

>>6197769
get cdbs

wear them until you can afford a pair of $300+ boots

>>6197597
they're my size bro, shoot me an email with pics if you're still interested in selling 'em

Kinda like boat shoes but not. Need some summer shoes. Should I cop?

y's for men

linen/cotton moto jacket sz 1

>>6197823

>>6197829

>>6197827

>>6197823

cop cop cop

>>6197843

could not hlp myself

the double zip is so sexy

>>6197830
>you may not operate erlenmeyer flasks or beakers

I wonder why that is

W2C

w2c?

>>6197829
>>6197830
That's a Y's for men piece? interesting

>>6197872

might have something to do with garment care, just a hunch

>>6197904
nah

the jacket physically gravitates away from beakers and conical flasks(◕‿◕✿)(◕‿◕✿)(◕‿◕✿)(◕‿◕✿)(◕‿◕✿)(◕‿◕✿)(◕‿◕✿)(◕‿◕✿)(◕‿◕✿)(◕‿◕✿)(◕‿◕✿)(◕‿◕✿)(◕‿◕✿)(◕‿◕✿)(◕‿◕✿)(◕‿◕✿)(◕‿◕✿)(◕‿◕✿)(◕‿◕✿)(◕‿◕✿)(◕‿◕✿)(◕‿◕✿)(◕‿◕✿)(◕‿◕✿)(◕‿◕✿)(◕‿◕✿)(◕‿◕✿)(◕‿◕✿)(◕‿◕✿)(◕‿◕✿)(◕‿◕✿)(◕‿◕✿)(◕‿◕✿)

>>6197900

yeah, also the measurements are way off for a womans garment. sleeves too long, shoulders too wide. The womens size 1 jackets have way smaller measurements than mens size 1 jackets.

>>6197915

lol yohji's magic makes it dodge abrasive liquids

>>6195890
Really digging the ones on the bottom left. W2c?

w2c beeswax cdb's for the cheapest price?

>>6197945

amazon or ebay

>>6197945
me
$40

if you're size10

>>6197960
i'm 10.5. You got any pics?

>>6197964
I am 10.5 in nikes/newbalance/adidas and these fit me fine

if you are in the LA area we could even meet up

>>6198004
picture doesn't show it well but the right shoe is like more burnished than the other got like that over time. Scuff marks on the right shoe but they are very hard to see.

also the crepe soles got blackish but I assure you that *will* happen. My homie has two pairs and both of this soles are black too

>>6198004
Shit, I meant I'm 9.5. Think it would be too big. Tfw tiny feet.

>>6198020
>making me look for my cdbs + take pics + try to sell them on 4chan

fuck you, nigger

>>6198037
fucking shit bruv i'm sorry

>>6198004
how much do you think it'll cost to get em shipped to vancouver

>>6198056
honestly I have no idea, ballpark estimate would be ~$15-20, I could find out for you and look at shipping rates at usps and ups if you're interested

>>6197937
no no my comment was more about the style of jacket, a bit rare to see Yohji do biker.

Bu that is definitely a Y's for men since the label code starts with a M,

if it starts with H it's pour homme, M is Y's for Men. F is for Yohji Yamamoto and Y is for Y's. Also i have Noir pieces which start with N.

>>6198219

its slightly oversize, i think it will be a fairly drapy fit for a biker jacket, the fabric will also be very nice for a summer/light jacket, i never see linen biker jackets.

but thanks for the info on the label tags, did not know what all of them meant.

>>6198232
what size are you? I saw the measurements for that jacket and it would be pretty tight on me. It's a size 1 in a Y's after all. Y's are usually more fitted and less drapey than YYPH.

The tags are easy to figure out once you have enough pieces to make a pattern, First two letters are the line and sometimes a season indicator, the second number starts with a letter designating the type of garment, J for jacket P for pants for instance and the last number is a material code. The material code varies every season as different blends are used with the exception of one, the 100 garbadine.

>>6198254

>what size are you? I saw the measurements

im not a big dude, 16"/40cm shoulders, 35" chest, 25" sleeve.

>First two letters are the line and sometimes a season indicator, the second number starts with a letter designating the type of garment, J for jacket P for pants for instance and the last number is a material code.

Ah ok, i have a pair of yyph trousers im looking at i see what youre saying. do you have any links to web pages that have this info? id like to bookmark it to double check when buying more yohji in the future.

>>6198324
nah bruv, it's just shit I remember. Don't worry about it too much, most pieces are great. Some of them are unisex essentially too, with the straight pants for instance, as long as they fit you in the waist you'll find they drape well.

What are the pants?

and holy shit you're tiny. You'd be needed to find size 1s... most size 2s would be pretty big on you. Pants would be an issue too unless you buy womens stuff, which is actually a good bet since the womens stuff don't sell for nearly as much as mens on the second hand market.

Mens stuff is grossly over inflated due to a recent surge in attention, fucking cunts.

>>6198289

no

>>6196913
I like them a lot, I would cop

>>6198430

size 1/s fits me really well actually, i can still find it pretty cheap on japanese sites, got a couple pairs today.

but yeah the balance/drape on yohji pieces is amazing. i would love to see one of his patternmakers work on fitting a pair.

Thinking I'm going to go camping/be outdoors a lot this summer. Should I get a good pair of boots or some sort of shoe?

>>6198591
i tried on a yohji women's coat once, best fitting piece of tailored wear i ever found tbh, cost like 1.5k tho, couldnt afford it
was srsly considering picking up the barneys credit card to cop but i was 2 wise 4 that

>>6198678

lol i love the yohji/cdg section at the barneys in century city. i go there every couple months and try stuff on w/ a friend and we try to memorize all the construction/detailing cuz we dont wanna take pics. last years buy was awesome, also the haider rack had killer pieces.

im so excited for my new yohji pants to get here i want to look at the pattern.

>>6197517
thanks man, really appreciate the pic and feedback.


Look great, could you post a close up of them from like maybe the side or something?

little to dark for me to see.

i rly like dem but i'm jst not sure about the zips

ne1 got sum fit pix with these? are the zips noticeable irl? does a version w/o exist?

w2c some brown derbies with brown soles

>>6197817
get a better brand. oak street bootmakers, quoddy and rancourt all make nice ranger mocs.

>>6198473
w2c these i been lookin for these mocs forever

>>6198947
Nike Mayfly wovens, had some luck on ebay

I'll get them regardless but

>>6198745
pls respond ;_;

>>6198981
I like them

>>6198981

theyre ok. there are just much better black hitops out there imo. i like them a bit better than cp hightops though. if you want something pretty minimal go for it.

how are steve madden gramms? price is $140 on amazon but the reviews are way mixed...

>>6198994
kk
>>6198995
i like them tons more than achilleses, i no there are cooler sneaks out there, but these manage to be both effay and p. cheap.

still not sure about the zips doe :(

>>6199008

side zips are awesome, i wish all my sneakers had them. why are you not sure?

>>6198997
every here is going to say do not cop just because they are cheaply priced

if it cost 2k dey wuld be jerkin all over dat shit tho

http://www.thetannery.com/ProductDetails.aspx?g=2&mode=sale&pid=29784&sid=60676

Opening ceremony varsity jacket for only $85?

c/n?

>>6199042
those r cool.

price?

>>6199020
i kinda feel like it detracts from the overall aesthetic of the piece, i kinda feel like it's rice

i mean, i know damir nos very well what he's doing, but i'm just not sure if it's compatible wiht my personal taste

>>6198997
lookslikeplastic/10
but i don't really know

>>6198997
cheaply made, look kinda chunky, but whatever buy em if you want

def change the laces if you do

>>6199043

i know what you mean about the zips but I have a pair and you get used to it. practically means they can be nice and high but easy to put on too

shop around a bit more if you're still unsure tho. I have ach mids too btw and they're okay but definitely suited more to a cleaner look

>>6198997
get em in black mayne

>>6198959
anyone?

Anyone ever own any A. Testoni shoes?
heard anything about the quality?

What Nike shoes are /fa/?
I really want to cop some flyknit lunar 1+ but they are a tad too expensive. Anyone have anything that look basically the same but $120 at the highest?

>>6198673
tobias are nice imo
i prefer them over alfies

>>6198673
i like the new photos of them but does anyone know how they look after a bit of wear?

>>6199218
How can you not be bothered to save an additional $30 if you want flyknits?

>>6199296
My girlfriend will be buying them. She barely gets by but has been begging to buy me shoes because I really want some, and it's all she has.

>>6199386
;_; aw I was gonna be mean but that's actually quite sweet. Get free runs in white.

was thinking this for a nice summer evening jacket?

>>6198823
>>6198797
>>6199164
>pls respond

>>6199562
first one has a terribly shaped toe, other two aren't even considerable imo

>>6199590
Don't know why I linked the second one.
Wasn't really considering copping either, asking where I could cop black derbys with brown sole and asking about A.Testoni quality

>>6198806
What are these?

>>6198728

Here you go

>>6199699

and another

>>6197548
You do realize that
>>6196279 and >>6196913 are the same shoe.

Yet you had different opinions for them?

>>6199083
post a fit with em pls
pretty keen to see how they look irl

kinda off topic but... anyone know where I can cop a wooden iphone 5 case? maybe engraved?

(✿◠‿◠)

>>6199842
not a scratch

>>6199701
>>6199699
are those the same model as the ones in my pic?
Toe looks way bigger in yours.

>>6199851
w2c

>>6199042
I want to hate them but they are passable/p cool

this:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B0078QHI86/ref=s9_simh_gw_p241_d0_i1?pf_rd_m=A3P5ROKL5A1OLE&pf_rd_s=center-2&pf_rd_r=172BZKY9CPX5EEJG8W0N&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_p=358549767&pf_rd_i=468294

or this:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B0070Y60K8/ref=s9_simh_gw_p241_d0_i2?pf_rd_m=A3P5ROKL5A1OLE&pf_rd_s=center-2&pf_rd_r=172BZKY9CPX5EEJG8W0N&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_p=358549767&pf_rd_i=468294

>>6200530
y-you posted the same link twice

That's fine for a casual watch tho

>>6196031
fucking sauce. These are beautiful

>>6200545
Different straps. Not sure which one to get

Just realised this thread is for shoes as well..

>>6198959
somebody plz

cop or not? I kinda like them

also how is the sizing?

>>6199851
h by hudson quality is not so great but if you get a good sale on them, sure. the style itself is nice.

source: I own some h by hudson shoes

>>6198959
no dude those are ugly

colorful sperry top-siders are bro-tier

colorful boat shoes and mocs can be done but sperry sucks at it. also color blocking is going to feel very played-out before long, I think.

http://imgur.com/a/v4qvE

>>6201265
>http://imgur.com/a/v4qvE
what's ugly about them? and why didn't you provide the brands of the shoes in that gallery?

>>6199242
this, i'm assuming they'd look a lot better. the lack of heel is the only thing about these, but their price is so cheap and the design is so basic i can't see why not.

>>6201379
lol they look so shitty in that photo.
I'm happy with my 1461, I'd say these are a pretty safe cop if you like the design.

>>6201536
Prepare your feet for a hellish break-in period though.

>>6200558
>not knowing guiseppe
i thought this was a fashion board. beware of fakes though.

help ! cop or not ?

>>6201613
nah

>>6201539
I don't get the hype about breaking in docs, my 1461s broke in after only a few days with minimal pain. I did put a coat of Obenauf's on them, so maybe that made a difference.

>>6201655
why not ?

>>6201613
hell yeah

>>6198673
here's another pic of them, any boots with similar styles?

>>6201613
COP

Getting these in Navy and blue

They have small boats on them.

>>6201265
>http://imgur.com/a/v4qvE

where can get info on these shoes?

>>6201720
First two are quoddy, third is Rancourt (I think), fourth is Oak Street, no clue what the rest are.

>>6201700
I would really like to know how these fit

>>6201720
1,2,6: Quoddy
3: Eastland Made in Maine (made by Rancourt)
4: Oak Street Bootmakers
5: Yuketen