/fa/ - Fashion

>>18040686
Thank God..

NEW THREAD
>>18040695
>>18040695
>>18040695
>>18040695
>>18040695

>>18040690
What model is this?

>>18040677
NEW THREAD
>>18040717
NEW THREAD
>>18040717
NEW THREAD
>>18040717
NEW THREAD
>>18040717
NEW THREAD
>>18040717

>>18040703
It's the KotTimer

>>18040734
Based

>>18040703
66-9990

Bump

GS drip

>>18041689
>>18041693

>>18041689
Who is this?

>>18041892
Some weeb

Seiko Orange monster and swamp kittie

...bye fren

>>18040677
This is a watch I enjoy been have never been very confident in wearing this one in public so I'll hide under a shirt sleeve. I like the crazy high polish. It's chrome plated tungsten case and bracelet so it's ridiculously heavy. 300 grams on my 6.5" wrist.

>>18041689
how much did you have to pay the prostitute to take this pic? or is it included? HOLY KEK dis bald nigga literally bought new shoes after getting btfo on a Honduran breast milk forum LMFAOOOOOOOOO

>>18040677
This is a watch I enjoy but have never been very confident in wearing this one in public; so I'll hide under a shirt sleeve. I like the crazy high polish. It's case and bracelet are chrome plated tungsten, so it's ridiculously heavy. 300 grams on my 6.5" wrist.

>>18042432
Context? Based btw.

>>18041892
Me.

Thoughts on my blue beater? First blue watch, kinda like it but kinda wish I got a blue diver instead.

>>18042478
it looks really nice anon

Why is this thread so slow? Here's another pic of her.. dang.

Why is this thread so slow? Here's another pic of her.. dang.

>>18040677
I took another pic of watch.

>ebay with 'authenticity guarantee' a good 1-2k less than GM
Anyone had any experience with this? I'm looking at something that isn't very popular like Rolex. And I've never heard of a Tudor fake especially one in silver. Not the best condition but I asked him if he would do $2500 and he said okay.

Tsukishima

>>18042444
>chrome plated tungsten
Based and heavy metal pilled

>>18042530
Im going to Japan for 4 weeks later this year
any recommendations of where to go/what to do? I was planning to split it up between Kanto and Kansai, but maybe Kyushu as well

>>18042641
Jokes aside it's too much of a big convo. You can join the discord server with a throwaway account and I'll tell you over a call

>>18042641
>4 weeks
NTA, whatever the fuck you want in that much time.
Ginza in Tokyo for the luxury watch shops. Nakano Broadway for more luxury and secondhand.

>>18042432
Based Florida man

>>18042635
It's literally perfect.

> Jokes aside it's too much of a big convo. You can join the discord server with a throwaway account and I'll tell you over a call

hi bittertadello.
what are you wearing today, fren?

>>18042711
the blunt hour hand sucks

>>18042711
Not anymore. The daily wear has been starting to show. I just checked it up with a super macro lense, wish I didn't.
I guess Zaratsu isn't meant for daily wear.

>>18042741
has started to show its signs*

>>18042741
Post some pics

where the FUCK am i supposed to find 17mm straps

Finally a nicely sized Hi Beat with subtle dial.

Rate my latest buy.

>>18042766
Should've bought an Edifice

>>18042767
This is perfection though.

>>18042768
Look at the level of finish on this piece, the free sprung balance, the blued screws, the accuracy I am getting on the wrist (+1s per day).

This in house movement was based on the JLC 899, a collaboration by these two manufacturers who have a huge history and who share the same parent company today.

>>18042768
lol not with that date window.
Did you just buy a used one or something?

>>18042771
>lol not with that date window.
I used to dislike it before I held the watch, actually, it's now my favorite feature of the dial. I am a no date kinda guy but this fits the watch perfectly. Note how the date window is placed perfectly in line with the arabics along the dial. Note how the date window doesn't jump at you because it's placed at 4:30 instead of 3, despite the color contrast. It's not what's expected. I prefer a date at 4:30 or 6 to a date at 3 any time of the week, pic related. This looks like shit, sorry VC. The new date only Overseas has been ruined, for me it's not an option anymore.

>>18042738
Have a pointy one then

>>18042772
>Note how the date window doesn't jump at you because it's placed at 4:30 instead of 3, despite the color contrast.
Are you gaslighting yourself?
It’s a giant asymmetrical blob of white on a black dial.
The least they could have done is colormatched the date wheel.

>>18042775
No, I'm telling you unironically that that's a photo effect. Seriously, look at the watch in person and you'll notice how it blends in. I can't really explain why but it does, I'm not making this up. I didn't like it at all before I had the watch in my hand, this looks fucking perfect. A tone in tone date window would have ruined the dial because the date would blend into the guilloche dial too much, making it look like an imperfection in the pattern.

The white background matches the arabics, I think that's why it works, it's a very weird optical illusion. For comparison, here's the white dial version, and it looks worse for it. That shit sticks out like a sore thumb.

And VC aren't lazy or stupid, they could have color matched that date window, they just knew it wasn't the right thing to do.

>>18042779
This picture shows the effect a little bit. Notice how the date at first glance just looks like arabic chaptering around the dial, because they are both white colored. Your brain doesn't recognize it as the date window until you actually look at it properly. It's like camouflage, the pattern is correct.

>>18042779
>>18042780
Are you trying to convince yourself? You seem desperate.

>>18042782
Literally just telling you what I see, I don't give a flying fuck whether you like it or not, go back to your Date Sub please.

>>18042773
How much was this?

>>18042768
The Overseas has always been APRO/Nautilus cope.
VC tried to do their own thing with the 222/333/Phidias and they all flopped.
When they just swallowed their pride and made followed the herd, their sports watch started selling.

>>18042783
Ah, there you are. Pissy and brittle, overly defensive about your purchase and getting nervous that no one has called you based yet.
It’s still a couple minutes before you start samefagging yourself some compliments though.

>>18042785
Not sure I'd call it cope seeing as how you mentioned the Overseas predecessors, they flopped yes but they existed, cope would be if VC came out with the Overseas out of nowhere to compete, which isn't the case. But yes, I'm aware of the history and I wouldn't touch the older models with a stick, either.

Doesn't mean the Overseas isn't great tho. It's undervalued and going up. People have been sleeping on it.

>>18042788
You? What the fuck? I'm not the person you think I am. We've never spoken before. You are mistaking me for that fat Italian retard or whatever.

>>18042789
>Not sure I'd call it cope seeing as how you mentioned the Overseas predecessors, they flopped yes but they existed,

Cope is basically the perfect term.
The customer is coping because he can’t get a Royal Oak or Nautilus.
VC is coping because the only successful sports watch is the one where they slavishly followed someone else’s formula.

>>18042794
>VC is coping because the only successful sports watch is the one where they slavishly followed someone else’s formula.
But the formula was the same with the 222, how is this coping when they reinvented what they already had decades ago? Those watches flopped for being ugly, the design elements are the same.

>>18042766
Based.

>>18042798
Ah, but it wasn’t. The 222 was meant to compete with late 70s bracelet-watches (think Piaget Polo, though that was 80s)
The Phidias was meant to be an upscale Santos de Cartier.

The Overseas, on the other hand, is just the APRO formula.

>>18042800
>>18042788
Samefag by the way, trying to prove his schizophrenic manic depressive fucking mania. End yourself you child molesting piece of tranny shit. I bet you think you're trolling us all with your inane 69iq shit.

>>18042770
Wait that's it?

>>18042768
>>18042772
>>18042779
>>18042780
>awful case
>awful numbers font
>awful minutes scale
>awful date
My condolences.

>>18042803
>Samefag by the way
Yeah, we know.

>>18042805
>i wish i could afford holy trinity
lmao

>>18042804
What do you mean?

>>18042802
I was mainly referring to the integrated bracelet sports watch design, less what they tried to compete with as a product.

>>18042803
>Samefag by the way
no, kys.

This is not going at all how he thought it would.

>>18042766
>>18042768
>>18042770
>>18042772
>stainless steel VC sports watch
Not what the brand is known and respected for.
>Overseas
Obvious Royal Oak/Nautilus cope.
>2nd gen Overseas
Literally the worst gen. Just look at those hands and unrefined machine-made guilloché dial... literally 90's Tag Heuer-tier.
>4:30 date window with non-matching colored date wheel
C'mon man...
>unnecessary unlumed arabic numerals with lumed indices next to them
...

So basically you went to Chrono24, typed in "Overseas" and filtered from lowest to highest price, right? This is what happens when you have a 12k budget but still want "high horology". You end up with an overpriced unremarkable already dated sports watch that was sleeping on Chono24 for months. The guy who sold it to you probably thought "whew, finally".

inb4
>cope
>poorfag
>post watch
>bitter
You all know I'm right. The 2000s are the worst era for luxury watches. Patek, JLC, Vacheron, Omega, Rolex... All these brands came up with the worst designs and the finishing was appalling. I can assure you there will be no nostalgia for these watches. Even the 90s were better.

>>18042812
That's some next level jealousy right here bro, get help.

>>18042812
>>18042812
>inb4
>>cope
>>poorfag
>>post watch
>>bitter
rolfmao you're not even trying bittercel lmfao

I'll post good watches to derail this thread that smells like shit.

>>18042816
Don't know if I should bother, but that bitteranon is mostly just wrong.

>>18042812
>Not what the brand is known and respected for.
Same applies to Patek yet the Nautilus is considered their most desirable piece.
>Literally the worst gen. Just look at those hands and unrefined machine-made guilloché dial... literally 90's Tag Heuer-tier.
The dial is hand-made using tools, it's not stamped. You're flat out wrong. No idea what your complaint could be regarding those beautiful hands either.
>design features are unnecessary
Retarded take. Either you like the design or not. That doesn't mean a particular thing you dislike is wrong about it, you just don't fucking like it. Guess what, there are millions of watches we don't like. Objectively there is nothing wrong with this design, it doesn't do anything that is considered a faux pas in the watch world, like putting Black Panther shit all over it for example.

>i-its not expensive enough
So your point was what again? That this watch should be more expensive? I agree.

>>18042818

>trying to move past getting absolutely buttblasted by anons lmao

>>18042822
>everyone is one person
Take your ritalin, retard.

>>18042822
I'm afraid your ass may have swallowed that buttplug, check it cause it's easy to end up at the hospital with that sort of shit, mate.

I have read other anons' posts about the Explorer in the previous thread and I have something to say.
I own and enjoy the current 36mm explorer, the watch looks great on an Oyster bracelet. It's a great watch. But it pisses me off that it's a 19mm bracelet instead of the classic 20mm one. Wake up my autism. OP, Explorer, Date Just, and Day Date are almost perfect, but there's always one silly detail that ruins everything. The rest of Rolex are a disaster in terms of design.

>>18042827
>36mm explorer,
It's a shitty fucking childrens sized watch man, let it go. It might be a better design than the current, but that doesn't make it wearable. Fucking get a normal sized watch that appeals to you instead.

>>18042829
That's what I like about this watch, that it looks small on my wrist. It is a modern watch that gives you the feeling of a vintange watch, it is something magnificent and rare to see in the industry and especially in a boomer brand like Rolex.

>>18042827
>Submariner is a disaster in terms of design
Absolute retard right here, applause everyone

>>18042819
Uh no. My point is you got scammed. You believe you bought some high horology exquisite timepiece when in reality you paid 12k for an outdated stainless steel VC from the worst era of the brand.
Did you even look up what early 2000s Vacheron really is? Richemont just bought the brand and they needed to maximize profit to keep the brand afloat. Same story with JLC, IWC, Piaget : the watches made in the 2000s are to avoid like the plague.

Look anon. Many of us have been in that situation before.
>have Rolex money
>think you're entitled to holy trinity
>look up what kind of holy trinity watch you can get with that Rolex money
>it's only 90s and 00s ugly shitter
Difference between >100 IQ people and (You) is you pulled the trigger on the VC that matched your budget.

If you can still return it, do it. Otherwise, cope.

>>18042832
Such a shame you're biologically unable to see how those 3, 6 and 9 are tragically bad in terms of design.

>>18042841
I am talking about modern Rolexes, the current Submariner seems like a nice watch to me, but too big for my taste.

>>18042843
>You believe you bought some high horology exquisite timepiece
How fucking dare you presume to tell me what I believe you disgusting, vile creature? Shut your fucking mouth.
>Look anon. Many of us have been in that situation before.
Keep your shitty fucking advice to yourself. The 2nd gen Overseas is considered by the watch market to be the best designed Overseas of all time. The 3rd gen is considered inferior in bracelet and case aesthetics. The 1st gen is the worst, which is where your vile garbage should be directed at. And since you seem so fucking oblivious, I'll point out that the 2nd gen was trading at 25k during the hype year.

Don't ever fucking dare visit these threads again you know nothing bullshitter. You're a broke piece of shit.

>>18042784
Around 3800 euros, import tax and all. New, straight from the ancestral land.

opinions?

>watch? casioak
>car? toyota
>motorcycle? yamaha
>weapon? katana

>>18042853
Oh shit anon, sounds like a hit a nerve uh?

>>18042858
>lolitrolu
Nah, I'm just allergic to people who post literal garbage and pass it off as some kind of arcane watch knowledge. You're so wrong that it hurts. I can post a million threads where the 3rd gen is shat on for being a step backwards in design. There is only one redeeming quality that makes the 3rd gen interesting, the superior movement and the fact that they are more expensive. That's it. It's considered by all to be a step back in every other regard. But don't take my word for it.

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=660366

>>18042853
so you can't return it anymore?
lmao you're stuck with it now

>>18042862
Yes, I'm stuck with a holy trinity timepiece that is appreciating in price on a daily basis (18k right now).

>>18042854
How on earth did you get that kind of a deal?

>>18042860
>there are other retards like me who bought the 2nd gen and who have to cope with the fact the 3rd gen absolutely mogs it
I don't even like the 3rd gen lmao. It's just slightly less worse.
The 222 is nice though. This is what high horology should be.

>>18042870
>I don't even like the 3rd gen lmao. It's just slightly less worse.
Nobody on this planet gives a flying fuck, virgin.
>The 222 is nice though.
I don't like it at all, it's an old man's watch.

Anyway, good luck being poor and drooling over things you'll never afford.

I never understood this obsession with Genta style watches. Nautilus and Royal Oak look good, but the rest look ridiculous. Sorry for the anon, but these VC looks terrible. Why do people try so hard? It is best to buy a simple Rolex if you want a sports watch and a Patek Calatrava if you want a dress watch. As simple as that.

>>18042875
Has it occurred to you that not everybody likes the same watch? Who the fuck cares what you find good looking? Holy shit this thread is just massive cope central at this point. Meanwhile you probably own a Tudor and call other watches terrible.

>>18042463
Just a typical Florida day fishing in the Everglades and there were lots of baby gators around. mama was nearby too.

>>18042875
threads full of bald janny retards that wear dogshit like polyester clothes and weeb shirts with (((designer))) shoes. zero taste, zero hair, and zero family. some even have to wagie cavies an hour earlier today. SAD KEK!

>>18042866
Buying the cheapest Overseas you could fine doesn't count as owning a holy trinity timepiece you fucking retard.
It's like paying $8k for Porsche 924 and believing you made it. The guys who are driving $300k Porsche are laughing at you.

>post ugly watch in an attempt to flex
>get humiliated
>can barely read the screen through the blur of tears
>spam “you’re all poor and jealous”
Tale as old as time

>>18042867
Japanese prices. Around here, I think I've only seen used ones go for the same price.

Hey look guys, i just bought this holy Trinity timepiece for $2.6k!
I’m part of the super exclusive high horology private club now.

>>18042880
You tried this exact same line of attack with the guy who posted the 90s VC a couple days ago.
It doesn’t work because vacheron constantin is a Trinity brand and those watches say vacheron constantin on the dial.

You’re being needlessly petty.

You can criticize the Overseas on its flaws (of which there are many) but saying it’s not a real vc is just moronic. Not everything they make is a high complication statement piece.

>>18042887
Cool, post a wrist shot when it comes in.

>>18042886
looks really nice under that lighting

>>18042887
If not fake, that's a great watch.

>>18042887
Beautiful watch

>>18042888
>B-B-B-BUT IT SAYS VACHERON ON THE DIAL!!!
When you say "I have a Vacheron Constantin" to a watch guy, he immediately pictures something like pic related, the American 1921 or the 222. Something in precious metal, rather dressy, and with that "old money" aesthetic Vacheron is known for. Basically something you paid $50k and patiently waited 2 years to get.
Show him your piece of shit stainless steel 2005 Overseas you bought on Chrono24 and he'll politely say "excuse me sir" and go as far away from you as he can.

I'm sure even VC will send your watch to fucking Baume & Mercier if you want to have it serviced by them.

>>18042902
>headcanon
If you say “I have a Vacheron Constantin” he expects to see a watch that says Vacheron Constantin on the dial.
What watch guy only thinks VC makes one kind of watch? You’d have to be a complete retard to think that.

>>18042768
>>18042772
>>18042779
>>18042780
Ugly as crap

>>18042913
True

>>18042906
All I'm saying is, if you have a shit-tier Vacheron you should use air quotes when talking about it.
>uh yes, I have a "Vacheron"
Maybe look at your shoes while doing it too.

That's called being polite and humble.
Like, imagine if a guy in the room says "hey me too" and suddenly shows off a 222. He would mog you into oblivion.

After reading this blood bath, I'd love to hear your guy's opinions on Vacheron's fifty six. I understand that theres no GH, but they can be had for a little over 10k used

>>18042894
The camera is pretty meh, so I tried to compensate a little. Been thinking of ditching the bracelet for a leather strap, but lately I've kinda grown accustomed to it.

>>18042932
It's not my cup of tea, I wouldn't buy it, but I think it's a nice watch

>>18042925
Uh, no. Vacheron is Vacheron. Whether or not one can be “”””mogged”””” by a solid gold watch is irrelevant.
Plus, go outside and actually talk to people. You’ll quickly realize they’re mostly nice and it’s you who is the asshole.

I think you need to put a lid on your jealousy.

How about posting a picture of your watch? Join in the fun.

>>18042768
>3 different fonts
I don't think this watch deserves as much criticism as you got but you probably overpaid for what you're getting based off of c24

>>18042925
I love hearing some gas station attendant’s opinions on luxury watches.

>>18042946
>>18042949

In my opinion the Overseas never looked good, it looks like a mall watch. On the other hand, a modern steel 222 with a navy blue dial would look beautiful.

>>18042925
You’re right. So let’s try a little role playing to see if I’ve got it:

>You
Hey, nice watch, what is that?

>Me
Oh, thanks. It’s a Vacheron- oh, no no no. Haha, not like that. It’s a shitty one, it’s steel. JLC movement. What’s that on your wrist?

>You
Oh, this is a Casio B1TT-3r. Japanese domestic market model.

>Me
Phwoar! How do you source something like that? Did you get it in Japan?

>You
Heh. A magician never reveals his secrets. Anyway. Sorry about your so-called Vacheron.

Has the Vacheron gatekeeper posted a single watch yet? Surely his opinion is backed up with first hand experience.

>>18042960
I have good news for you anon...
All jokes aside you're right, the Overseethe as always been an ugly cope watch with an unnecessary overdesigned bracelet and bezel.

>>18042766
>buying a 42mm stainless steel integrated bracelet watch in 2024
It’s not 2020 anymore. People are wearing small dress gold watches now. Unironically this >>18042887 would have been a better choice

>>18042976
Had to wait for prices to come down to earth.

>>18042880
>Buying the cheapest Overseas you could fine doesn't count as owning a holy trinity timepiece you fucking retard.
It's not even close to the cheapest OS. The cheapest OS is the gen 1 let alone the Quartz shitters.

The black dial OS is approaching 20k, which puts it just a few thousand away from the entry level 3rd gen (white dial). You are so full of shit it's not even funny.

If you had said grey dial OS gen 2, I may ALMOST agree with you, but the black dial is the second most valuable flavor and by a lot. In fact the time only black dial is the same price as the dual time variant and just below the Chronograph, off by a couple thousand if that.

>>18042902
>When you say "I have a Vacheron Constantin" to a watch guy, he immediately pictures something like pic related
I can't hold all these baseless assumptions. You're a clear cut mouthbreather. That's like saying everybody thinks Nautilus when you say Patek.

Believe it or not but unlike Rolex and Omega, VC is not a one watch brand. They have a successful sports line that is iconic and they have a successful dress watch complication line.

>>18042987
>>18042990
You know that by trying so hard to fight back you’re just confirming how upset that guy made you.

>>18042947
>I don't think this watch deserves as much criticism as you got
I honestly don't care, I didn't come here looking for approval, I came to talk about watches including my latest buy (of many). I am actually more surprised by the forced

>HAHA LOOK HOW MUCH HE CARES

reactions to my posts, obviously I'm going to praise something I like, I praised the OS for years before I bought one, how is that a surprise?

And yes I understand your criticism, doesn't bother me personally.

>>18042993
There are 5+ people taking issue with this guy's bullshit and only one of them owns an Overseas, what does that tell you? People just don't like his tranny bullshit, he's full of painful jealousy and it shows. And the problem is that he is FACTUALLY wrong. You can scream about UMAD all day long, the guy is LITERALLY LYING about FACTS in order to make another man's purchase bad (which is to say nothing of what he owns, if anything).

He's here claiming that this piece is a cheap low entry Vacheron, then he shifted the goalposts to cheapest OS, and that still isn't true. It's factually the middle rank of all Overseas models, and that's nothing to be ashamed of.

So his argument is basically
>how dare you own an Overseas at a reasonable price point

What the fuck.

>>18042994
>I honestly don't care, I didn't come here looking for approval
>>18042766
>Rate my latest buy.

>>18042997
That's a fucking meme, did you seriously take that literally? You don't know the rating meme? Fuck me dead.

>>18042994
>I didn't come here looking for approval, I came to talk about watches
You came here to try and flex. You haven’t been here that long or you’d know that never works.
Why do you think most of the guys who own nice watches never post them? The seething poorfags drown the thread with their bitterness.

The second gen Overseas is still ugly, though, and that bezel is way too contrived.

>>18043000
>You came here to try and flex.
No I didn't. You're projecting your insecurities onto me. This is pathetic as fuck. I hope you die a painful, slow death, the world will be better off. Didn't read the rest of your shit tier post, btw. I'm done with you.

>>18042999
>I was only pretending to be retarded and you fell for it trololololol

>>18043003
Butthurt over someone having more money than you. I genuinely don't give a fuck. If I was here to flex,

ON AN ANONYMOUS IMAGE BOARD,

F L E X

(holy shit)

I wouldn't have tried to shift the conversation to the JLC ebauche. I was here to talk Vacheron pieces. Sadly you people are the toxic waste dump of watch collecting, so enjoy your 60s Omega discussions, I'm leaving. See you tomorrow.

We’ve ruined this poor guy’s day. I kind of feel bad.

>>18043007
Yes, I'll be crying myself to sleep tonight, meanwhile you will be waking up broke on a shitty job in a dead end career wearing a Seiko. Ouch. You sure showed me by shitting on my one of ten Swiss watches.

>>18043006
>See you tomorrow.
Meaning you’re going to try and flex again tomorrow and hope you get a better reaction?

>new chronomat 36 …..Victoria Beckham edition

The color is admittedly nice. But look how she fucked how the second hand. It says “Victoria” on the case back too.

I’m in the market for a blue chronomat 36 soon. I feel it will compliment my explorer and santos well.

>>18043010
Seethe harder, poorfag. I'll be posting luxury watches whether you like it or not.

>>18042999
>be (You)
>buy a VC
>ask people to rate your watch
>people don't like it
>one anon is tearing you a second asshole
>(You) completely lose it and type walls of text to justify your purchase
This obviously looks like a severe case of buyer's remorse, man.
Have some time off /wt/ to think about it, and if you do actually regret buying it then send it back or try to sell it.

>>18043006
>I'm leaving. See you tomorrow.

>>18043009
>>18043010

That didn’t take long.

>>18043014
>>one anon is tearing you a second asshole
I must have missed that, but whatever makes you feel better. All I saw was lies and deceit from a seething poorfag.

>>18043015
I'll leave when I please, continue shitposting.

>>18043016
lol you’re so feminine.

>>18043017
Unlike your girlfriend, unfortunately.

>>18043014
>>(You) completely lose it and type walls of text to justify your purchase
Yeah, except that didn't happen. I didn't justify shit, I posted why I like it.
>This obviously looks like a severe case of buyer's remorse, man.
You're projecting.
>Have some time off /wt/ to think about it, and if you do actually regret buying it then send it back or try to sell it.
How delusional must you be, how much time must you spend here, that you think one would sell a great watch because someone on the internet (who can't afford it anyway) doesn't like it?

This is comedy? Satire? Are you people REALLY this insecure about yourselves? Do you also dress like shit so nobody notices you standing in the corner at parties?

>>18043016
>seething poorfag.

Speaking as a fortunatefag, calling out the less fortunate, regardless of their behaviour, is quite classless. Remember to keep your bearing.

This is one of the best meltdowns we’ve had in a while.

>>18043022
Fortunate is a bit of an assumption, I'm not a trustfund baby if you think that. I have zero sympathy for people who are poor for their laziness or stupidity though.

I don't shit on people who can only afford low end pieces like Breitlings tho, now that's classless. Buy what you like as long as it's quality.

>>18043024
>>18043007
Why do you keep doing that, posting like you're narrating? As though you're not sitting emotionless in front of your screen? Are you autistic, pretending this is some kind of celebrity roast? Boring as fuck, dude.

>>18043026
>34 unique posters
>There’s only one other guy in here with me.
Meds, now.

>>18043028
I made that joke like two hours ago before I went to take a shower. Once again, unimaginative as fuck.

Eh, I'm bored of this, you have nothing more to give.

>>18042932
I like this particular one, i think it looks cool with the right amount of both dressy and sporty.

>>18043029
>Eh, I'm bored of this, you have nothing more to give.
Maybe, but you have been an extremely productive lolcow.

Money doesn't give you good taste.

>Rate my latest buy.
>Extremely expensive watch.
>Extremely ugly watch.

>>18043021
How about you post a wristshot of that 42mm watch? I'm sure it looks great on you. That will make us seethe even more.

>>18042994
>>18042996
>>18042999
>>18043002
>>18043006
Holy shit, have some dignity man

>>18043037
He’s probably run away.
He’ll try to get updoots again tomorrow before putting it on eBay later this week.

>>18042766
I actually really like it, and all that matters is that you like it. Can you take a pic with it actually on your wrist?

>>18043042
Going after the Rolex market I see.

>>18043023

>>18042766
>>18042768
>>18042770
>>18042772
>>18042779
>>18042780
BASADO
Fuck all these, secretly jelly, seethers.

>>18043048
>Can you take a pic with it actually on your wrist?
He’s not going to fall for that.

>a fucking moon face

moon phace
moon fase

>there are no good chronographs tod-

Is white the new hype color?

>>18043250
Only when it looks this good.

>>18043287
This looks awful.

>>18043287
This looks awful.

Awfully good.

>>18043287
I maintain that only black people and women can pull off white straps. Looks tacky on men.

I miss him bros..

I am a watch casual and beginner. I want something that is really clean, understated, but nice.

The Hamilton khaki auto 38mm really has caught my eye and I can get a new one for $540.

Is this a good decision for a long term do it all watch?

I'm going to post in all threads because you guys have 17 watch threads

>>18043023
>>18043075
>>18043122
On some days I think this looks cleaner than Grand Seikos. Name of this particular model?

>>18042766
Highly redpilled

>>18043436
Citizen "The Citizen" aq4080-52a IIRC

>>18043287
>IIII

LMFAOOOOO might as be a grand seiko this is so SHIT LOL

>>18043075
Kek

>>18043287
Mort’s back and still embarrassing himself.

>>18043287
Looks like something a vintage 30's racing car owner would wear.

>>18043503
Race car drivers in the 30s weren’t fat either. Weight costs lap times.

>>18043507
kys fag

>>18043508
Lmao, you too sweetheart. :^)

Quick reminder that the "Holy Spirit" of the Horology Trinity makes literal G-Shocks nowadays.

>>18043392
Or do the chad thing and buy 108 F-91Ws

>>18043392
Save up money for a grand seiko. You won't want to wear anything else after that.

>>18043042
I like that they watermarked the dial so you can't just reuse it without proper attribution

>>18043075
blessed pic

>>18043287
Why the IIII? Honest question.

>>18043657
Becauseb in this house we respect the God of Thunder

>>18043021
M8, why the fuck are you replying to bitter? Just do your thing. One could post a dufour and the faggots here will say that it's shit because he outsourced the hands or whatever.
The more they seethe, the more you post.
Please post more of your watch. I can't believe someone here bought a VC (besides mort).

>>18043589
500 dollars compared to 5 grand is quite the difference

>>18043677
Yeah but it's one and done. You will buy a 1000$ watch soon after you get your 500$ watch and a 1500$ after that ---. It will be just paper weight. And don't get a 5K GS, get one a bit higher end. Around 8K

>>18043687
if i had the money i would follow your advice and buy one but i dont maybe one day

>chewdor

>>18043689
Well at 500$ there are actually many watches that you can choose from. I'd argue even that the biggest marker is around 300$ to 800$
Have you looked into orient? If brand is not important then I would also recommend san martin. Sadly, if it's seiko then the only one at that price point that I can recommend is the Alpinist burlt that one goes for 750$ But you might be able to find it slightly used at 500$
Orient I would recommend the Bambino if you want a more dressy-watch aka more plain looking one.
Some entry level mido might also do the trick. But, the khaki that you posted is also a solid choice even though I don't have any experience with them or Hamilton in general.
Just go out there and try them on yourself. There's more watch stores than one might think. They are invisible to someone who isn't looking for one.
Pic related is the "baby alpinist"

>>18043700
Biggest market*

>>18043480
>>18043657
The american education system is the ultimate joke here.

>>18042768

The date window at 4:30 is bad enough. They didn't even bother to color match the dial? And the distance between 4 and 5 o'clock are completely off. Is this what people are paying $10k+ for? What are you really getting for this much money?

In Latin, Jupiter was spelt IVPPITER. As you don’t mess with gods, Romans might have felt hesitant to engrave part of their supreme deity’s name on a sundial or printed in books. This is why the number IIII, even though inconvenient, might have been prefered over IV. While sundials had become obsolete with the advent of watchmaking, the number IIII might have been used just for the sake of tradition.

>>18043707
Brand recognition.

Just got this for my kid’s 4th birthday
Are flikflaks based?

>>18043657
It's called a watchmaker's four.

>>18043575
Patek, Vacheron and ROLEX are the current trinity

If the holy trinity of swiss watchmakers are VC PP and AP, then the Devil of swiss watch makers must be Richard Mille

and the demon lords are Invicta, Hublot, and Swatch

>>18043717
Yes. You're a good dad.

>>18043759
>toy (poor)
:^/
>toy (rich)
:OO

>>18043480
>>18043657
Ignorance: transcended.

>>18043711
That's a nice quirky explanation, probably somewhat true, but the actual reason is that it doesn't have to be confused with VI when you quickly check the time.

>>18043868
It also balances the dial, you have four numbers with just 'I's, four numbers with 'I's and 'V's and four numbers with 'X's and 'I's.

Kofe time.

>>18043877
Very true. Smart observation.

>>18043864
I said it looks like SHIT, don’t give a fuck about some other ugly SHATTER or it’s HISTORY DUMBASS. It’s looks GAY

>>18043920
But you ARE GAY, so what's worse? To look or to be?

>>18043920
>Imagine getting angry because you don't understand roman numbers.
Fucking hilarious

Whats up faggots! Still seething? Still coping? Still bitter?

>>18043864
I like this. Explorer style case.

>>18043864
I like this explorer style case.

>>18043981
you betcha!
we hate everything here

>>18043868
No, the actual reason is that Jove is the one true God. Without him you are nothing.

>>18040677
Here we go. Found one. That's my style right here.. want it. Maybe oneday. Thats a lot to spend on a watch though. It easy to get very similar look for way less.. but that's a legit rolex so it's fancy.

>>18044032
That one looks fishy to me. Possibly a redial?

>>18044041
Ohhh. I'd never go for something like this without giving it due diligence.. good tip. Thanks.

Post watch, or else, poorfag confirmed.

there’s literal retards in here that can’t distinguish between IV and VI but I’m the dumb one. LMFAOOOOOO learn to read a watch FAGS

>>18044076
Take your meds!

>>18044041
Youknow giving this watch some due diligence reveals its sort of a Franken rolex. The dial is repainted and the movement is not original.. I'm not terribly bothered by it.. but I'd search longer for a watch thats all original.
I like the green dial thiugh.

>>18044032
>>18044041
Of course is a repainted dial.

>>18044076
YOU are the dumb one, don't doubt yourself, shit king.

>>18044148
I like this how this watch looks. What does the little emblem mean above the 6 oclock marker?

>>18044153
It's the chronomaster eagle (chicken).

>>18044155
>chronomaster eagle
looks cool. what is the reference number on this one? it's nicer than the other ones I see on google images that have extra text on the dial. I like the simplicity of this one more. How much do they cost?

>>18044186
https://www.gnomonwatches.com/products/the-citizen-eco-drive-sunray-silver-ref-aq4080-52a

>>18044191
Thanks. Too bad it's priced so high. I was expecting it to be like 500 dollars or something, I thought Citizen was a value brand

>>18044200
Jap brands try to cater to every market segment.
Attesa is probably their best offering in the 500 range:
https://www.sakurawatches.com/citizen-attesa-cb3015-53e

>>18044032
>>18044046
Teenage ESL retard.

Can someone recommend me a watch similar to this but with more classic dress watch dimensions? I would like to one day get a white gold manual wind Cartier but for now I am a poorfag.
The Nomos Ludwig looks ok but I don't like the Bauhaus font for the roman numerals.
I'm going to a black tie wedding in the summer and I want to have a cool watch for it.

>>18044211
There's one here you blind idiot >>18043864

What's the verdict on Seiko Save the Ocean?

>>18044204
That looks alright but I don't like it as much. Is there anything that looks more like your chronomaster chicken but under 1k?

>>18044216
I really really like them

>>18044216
It didn't.

>>18044148
That watch looks great, for me simple designs are the best. But the anons will think it's a boring watch that could be improved with an integrated bracelet, five screws on the bezel and a purple dial.

>>18044217
There is the NB1050, it's automatic.
https://www.japan-onlinestore.com/citizen-nb1050-59a-citizen-collection-mechanical-classical-line

Any opinions about FC? My boss gives me these points at work I can redeem for stuff. Theres a couple more expensive ones like the world timer but it's a bit gaudy for my taste, a few longines but the faces on them are busy and some tissot which I wasnt really a fan of. I'm not autistic about watches or trying to show off, just looking for something that looks decent.

>>18044242
>My boss gives me these points at work I can redeem for stuff
a salary...?

>>18044216
>libtard slogan
>asking if it's good

>>18044239
I like the translations on the site.
>back skeleton
>24 stones
hmm yes, you know it's quality to have that many stones

>>18044211
Buy a steel Cartier with a quartz movement.

>>18044242
They're decent for their price. They mostly copy Patek's designs.

>>18044242
they are pretty shit. but if you like how it looks then go for it

>>18044247
If I'm going to get a real one eventually anyway I'd rather not get a fake one right now. I would feel a bit weird wearing a cheap steel Cartier around. I think it'd be better not to cope withe the Must line.

>>18044211
ANON LISTEN TO ME.
Go vintage. Specifically Omega and IWC from the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s (the best decades for watchmaking). There are tons of Calatrava style watches around 1,5k eurobucks. Steel case, 33 to 36mm, manual or automatic.

>>18044244
>only libtards like the ocean
Retard alert

>>18044259
>the ocean is dying because of some plastic bottles it's literally the apocalypse dude!!
libtard spotted

>>18044251
Seiko SWR052P1

>>18044258
Are there people who prefer a Nautilus over this beauty? I don't understand.

>>18044271
Different watches for different people.

>>18044276
That's true, anon ,everyone has their own tastes.
I can't resist that Calatrava style.

>>18044243
No it's just like social recognition good boy points program. At the moment I'm wearing a micky mouse watch.

>>18044278
These old Calatrava are pretty much perfect. Too bad they're like 20k+ now.
It drives me crazy I have to buy cope watches even when it comes to vintage.

>>18044287
>These old Calatrava are pretty much perfect.
I find it incredibly bland and boring, not pretty at all. Different watches for different people.

Hypothetically does a Lange 1815 go well with a T-shirt, jeans and two-week-old beard?

>>18044287
If you're gonna use sticks you should at least have an interesting dial background or an interesting case. Calatrava is too often bland in every single aspect.

>>18044294
Too many dots on that retarded dial.

>>18044298
You think the number of dots is the main problem?

>>18044294
holy FUCK, there are absolutely zero numerals at the 4 and 8 positions. How will you ever tell the time? HOW?????Don’t you need it spelled out for you like your some polyester wearing casio wagie?

>>18044314
This. Imagine if your smartphone said "3:15" at 3:15 and "_:15" at 4:15. It's ridiculous.

>>18044301
I judge according to my own visual taste.

BASED JLC REVERSO
soiko ans shitizen wearers eat your heart out

>>18044366
>duoface
le cringe

>>18044366
Way too big for him (for anyone actually).
Looks like an Apple watch. This kind of watch is supposed to be small.

>>18044366
>soiko ans shitizen wearers eat your heart out
Eh, why?

>>18044370
>>18044371
>>18044373
Cope harder

>>18044395
Copelarp

>>18043700
Nice tips, thank you

>>18042827
The modern Datejust just looks like a Milgauss now which is retarded. I mean you can go with the 36 with fluted bezel and jubilee bracelet but then it would look like a retiree. I think the 41 with flats looks nice if you're younger, but its still retarded that Rolex doesn't make watches that appeal to younger buyers.

>>18044773
not that i agree with your initial premise (i dont think fluted/jubilee looks "retiree" I just think that's the quintessential datejust config), but personally I like the 41 in fluted/oyster since it has the mix of sporty bracelet but flashy bezel

>>18044773
I actually like the Milgauss/Explorer look.

>>18043700
broski, thank you for telling me about san martin. Those looking fucking great and are half the price

>>18044798
Second hand experience. Good friend of mine bought 3 already. He can't shut up about them and they truly are one of, if not The best value for money rn. Some would argue better than orient. But orient has that brand recognition (to some degree compared to SM)

>>18044191
I always thought your shitty watch was some 300 dollar shitter lmao

>>18044191
Literally the best watch of all time.

>>18044279
>social recognition good boy points program
Cute. I think if you're used to a Mickey watch then you won't care about the features the FC may lack. As long as it fits your wrist I think it's a good choice

>>18045053
You know it.

>>18044773
>Datejust 41

>>18045099
How can a dial be so minimalistic yet so full of soul and depth?

>>18042780
ugh, another case against the """holy trinity"""
shitters the lot of them, even patek started doing terrible looking designs these past few years

>>18045116
>even patek started doing terrible looking designs these past few years
Yes. I blame this fat jewkike Thierry Stern who was named CEO in 2006. That's when the brand went to shit. His wife is head of design too. They both have terrible taste.

>>18043130
>tfw a shitter sits next you

>>18045121
fuck, meant >mfw

>>18045120
Here's the kind of thing Thierry Stern is doing at Patek.
It's a watch with a PICTURE OF HIS FATHER ON IT for fuck's sake. He doesn't even really look like Philippe Stern, I think he kinda looks like Lenin.
Can you imagine wearing this and having to see the face of some guy every time you check the time? Thierry Stern is such a hack.

>>18044366
>downey
lol
lmao

>>18045124
I don't mind that they made this shitter, because if not for the stupid dial, it seems a fairly decent looking watch, so after discontinuing this retarded special edition they could change the dial and sell a decent(ish) watch, but the new calatravas and whatver the other line is in the recent years just seem like a complete shit on the brand name
>poker styled watch for either stupid zoomer or sleazemaxxers
>calatrava that is a field watch
what the fuck, honestly
patek used to be elegant

Are there any high quality smart/sports watches with solar charging? My Suunto can go like 2-3 weeks with one charge if I don't use the features like the light so I think it should be possible for it to be solar. Are there any watches like that out there?

>>18045128
>patek used to be elegant

>>18045130
I don't think the tech is there just yet, i could be wrong though, idk.

>>18045133
compared to this ugly shitter it's basically radiating elegance

>>18045099
How are the bracelets on these things? For the higher price it would be nice if it came with toolless quick adjust.

thoughts?
its like 60 bucks

>>18045158
too fat for what it is, though for 60$ you can hardly get better deals
i have same base design san martin that's sub 12mm thick and with quick adjust clasp for ~200€

>>18043883
Wrist time

>>18045158
How the fuck is that 14mm?

>>18045133
For what it is that is elegant.

>>18045130
I think garmin has some models with solar cells, no idea of the names though

>>18045152
Compared to some of Patek's modern watches, that's pretty elegant itself. At least you can read the time fairly easily. Look at this thing for example.

>>18045196
That's amazing.

>>18045196
>>18045199
truly amazing that patek still gets any business

>>18045120
Jesus Christ he's disgusting. I like her Botticellian dress though.

fellas I am kinda starting to get bored of my skx007 after almost 8 years of daily wear
would it be retarded to sell? I kinda want to abuse chinese shitters like pagani

>>18045339
change the strap first. nylon, leather, or choose diff colorways. it drastically changes the aesthetics, giving it a fresh look.

>>18045130
Garmin instinct solar

ded thred