/fa/ - Fashion

post your first watch

>>17865139
This one.
Was okay for a first entry level shitter.

>>17865142
Lange watches are beautiful at the back but terrible at the front.They should stick to making skeletonized watches

>>17865139

Prx is overrated, but it's also overhated in here.

Reminder that if you can't post your watch on a stripper's ass you're not going to make it.

>>17865135
What are you wearing, frens?

>>17865139

>>17865171
At work, so wearing my very first Gshock. I've somehow avoided them all these years. It's doing pretty well so far, pretty much as expected. A great watch to wear a work and has already withstood some impacts.

>>17865161
A Prx for like 600 bucks is perfectly acceptable. Yeah there's watches with better movements at that price, but it's really not that bad.

>>17865139
I think the very first one was a Casio (not sure if F-91-w or not) which i broke within an hour by reading 'water resistant' and putting it into a sink full of water, so that doesn't count. Some time later i then got this beast, it had PROPER 50m of water resistance and was made out of virtually indestructible hard plastic. It also had this cool feature where you could punch in the distance and then if you timed something with the stopwatch it would give you the average speed (above the km/h on the dial). I wore it until the strap broke.

>>17865171
My long jeans daily watch

>>17865206
are the indices blue or is that just the camera?

>>17865207
Camera, indices are grey and white, albeit in other dial colors they are raised…but dont have loom. Think would prefer that since the loom is kind of poopy

I am digging the slim look of LF-10wh but some people might say that this is for female? Is it true?

suggest me some work-appropriate watches that can withstand wear and tear but not a F91 or a G-Shock."

>>17865206
If I had to get a Longina, I'd get the Hydroconquest GMT. It's not perfect, but it's extremely good, especially considering Longines is not allowed to make a watch better than an Omega.

~2700USD, 41mm dia., 12.9mm thick, true GMT, 72hr PR, 300m WR

>>17865226
What's your work?

>>17865219
>fitbit homage
The fuck is Casio doing?

>>17865226
F-91W is the only answer but since you're a fag get the Rolex explorer. If you're a poorfag get a Tissot PRX.

where my hamilton bros at

New Seiko x Senbei just dropped!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oEcFRnmLw2E

My JDM baby Alpinist on an uncle seiko president bracelet. I love this so much and the whole thing cost <$600

>>17865242
Someone please get this man a wrist

What is your personal rule for how much of your salary you spend on a watch?

>>17865250
>anything less than 90%
NGMI

>>17865250
If you've got all your debts paid off, have no problem paying your bills, and can still manage to save at least 30% of your income, then you can spend whatever's left however you like.

>>17865139
>post your first watch

I can't find it.
My first watch was some small G-Shock I was like 8 years old or so, I think the face was round at the top, flat at the bottom and had a big lighting button with a g on it in the middle.

>>17865243
and a life, not healthy posting the same materialistic goods over and over like some girl. Must make such poor financial decisions that he needs constant approval from strangers on a budget shitter any wagie with a job can have.

>>17865219
>but some people might say that this is for female? Is it true?

Lf-20w is for men.

>>17865181
Maybe if it wasn't so fucking huge that it catches on anything and everything it didn't have to be able to withstand impact???

>>17865175
I have it in black PVD, it was the first watch I bought for myself with my own money.

>>17865135
Jesus that is terrible.

>>17865232
delivery driver
i managed to break a Vostok, if that gives you any idea

>>17865226

>>17865267
>managed to break a Vostok

Gshock square.
Or something cheap you wouldn't mind destroying, like f91w/lf20-w, Timex expedition, Timex ironman.

These are the most work appreciate watches for a person lifting things.

>>17865263
I lift shit for a living too and when I took my plastic Casio lf-20w to work it got caught on something and violently ripped the metal springbar out of the plastic case damaging the lug.

I managed to find the springbar and put it all back together see >>17865261, the springbar fit back into a damaged hole alright and holds the band again but yeah, the cheap Casio aren't durable they are disposable, you just buy a new one when it breaks.

ive come to realize 90% of /wt/ is deadbeat poor

>>17865230
Yeah i was just thinking about this earlier today cause i dont have a diver but was also wondering why buy a bunch of longines tier watches when i can just get an actual sub and be done with it

The biggest thing is i refuse to play the ad mutual masturbation game so yeah

>>17865282
As opposed to 99% of general population?

>>17865282
Poorfag watches are fun

>>17865282
post your collection

>>17865282
I am poor yes.

>>17865282
>deadbeat poor

I have a real life gambling debt. Not complaining, I consider it a part of my story.

But when that is settled, still not gonna run out and buy myself a GS or Citizen 0100, house and a good car come first.

>>17865285
>The biggest thing is i refuse to play the ad mutual masturbation game so yeah
Fortunately for you, those days are basically in the past save for the Daytona and GMT-Master II. The overhype days are over.
For any other Rolex, if they don't have what you want in stock, they can get just about any normal model in a couple weeks. (Some particularly rare dial variants may take longer, since those aren't produced in high numbers.)

If you just want an entry level model like an Explorer or OP, or a common DJ combination like two-tone with a champagne dial, those will probably be in stock and you can just walk out with one that day.

>>17865230
>41mm x 13mm
I'm not morbidly obese so no

>>17865298
...so you can't even afford a Longines? Jesus, man. Get your life in order.

>>17865298
Is it a perfect watch? No, not by any stretch but it's actually within a millimeter of the Rolex in every dimension and only the most limp-wristed manlets complain about its size. You're just bitching about numbers on a screen.

>>17865181
You picked the worst and most useless one.

Post aesthetic victories.

>>17865226
Rolex

>>17865315

>>17865250
2 years max

>>17865302
I have a grand seiko already, I also own a condo in one of the most expensive cities in the world. Just how much of a train wreck is your life that buying an ugly "swiss" (not really) watch is going to "get your life in order", fuck

>>17865322
>Nnnooo! I'm rich! I swear! I have a Seiko!!!
Thanks, kiddo. This thread needed some comedy.

>>17865325
Doesn't take much to look like bezos next to someone bragging about being able to "afford" a longines

>>17865327
And yet a Seiko owner still feels the need to pipe up. If it was no big deal, he wouldn't have been so easily baited, right?

>>17865318
I prefer the no-date version. It has better balance.

>>17865293
That’s nice, i went to a watches of switzerland in my city and went over to pic rel and some boring sales wagie told me it wasnt for sale before i could even inquire. He did let me try it on though. Maybe a more mom and poppy place, I also have a contact through a church friend’s relative i dunno

Maybe when i get my bonus early next year ill open a new premium credit card to hit a spend bonus and seriously inquire about one

>>17865329
My bad for having a nicer watch than you, in the future I'll only mention raketas and parnis and longines and other quality european timepieces

>>17865226
Rolex Submariner Clone
Then sell it off after a year or two of usage

>>17865335
Post it.

>>17865329
Piss off, your shitty Longiness is both far less impressive and less expensive than a Seiko.
Sorry did I say less impressive? Actually it looks like a piece of shit Longiness suck dick, an absolute cope brand you get when you're desperate for just anything swiss.

The only reason anyone buys Longiness is when you can't afford Omega.

You know what's the difference between Longiness and Seiko? Some people actually like their Seiko

>>17865315

>>17865335
Let me guess, you've spent at least as much on anime has you have on watches. We know. It's obvious.

>>17865135

>>17865338
https://www.google.com/search?q=seiko&tbm=isch

Here you go, have fun

>>17865341
>Some people actually like their Seiko
Yep, they sure do.

>>17865315

>>17865353
Average sinn fanboi

>>17865315

I'm a temporarily embarrassed multimillionaire, what watch do wear as a cope until I unlock my Rolex?

>>17865365
Nothing. If anyone asks what you wear, say
>Rolex Day-Date. It's currently being serviced, though.

>>17865341
Lmfao actually mad over a chink watch

>>17865365
Tissot, Rado, Frederique Constant, or of course, Longines

>>17865349
Based.

>>17865365
Beware, after owning one of these you may find you don't need a Rolex after all (and never have). Get yourself a quality timepiece for a reasonable price and invest the rest, anything else is madness.

>>17865349
This guy is unironically funny and based.
Nice try using him as your seethe avatar.

>>17865365
Clone submariner and sell it off once you get the real deal.

>>17865369
Yeah, I want a watch from the cool people that make the best consumer products, anime, Mazda, bomb Pearl Harbor and commit atrocities, and I'm not sorry.

Who the fuck cares about the swiss? Do they make rotary engine cars? Are they innovating with solar movements? Maybe at least they made a cool cartoon about fucking your 8yo little sister? No? Then why the fuck do they deserve any respect?

womanbrained general

>>17865349
I fucking hate this guy.

>>17865373
>after owning one of these you may find you don't need a Rolex after all
https://youtu.be/mugRenBeRw0
imagine importing from the US too at that
>Get yourself a quality timepiece for a reasonable price and invest the rest, anything else is madness.
why? it's chump change and I would still be poor either way
>>17865375
are you the how to get free rolexes buy scamming guy? sir, I don't wanna scam
>>17865371
name ONE Model
>>17865368
>shit that nobody asks a person not wearing a watch never

>>17865387
It's not a scam if you pass a clone, it's 1:1 down to the movement details. Just don't do it too often.

>>17865387
>are you the how to get free rolexes buy scamming guy? sir, I don't wanna scam
Don't have to scam at all. Just buy a decent replica. If you act and dress the part, have a job and lifestyle that suggests you could afford a Rolex, then everyone will just accept that it's real.

>>17865389
If you have a job that suggests you could afford a Rolex why would you buy a replica?

>>17865365
seiko two tone obv

>>17865390
To keep the money.

20k in Rolex is gonna be scratched and beat up Rolex.
20k in Bitcoin is gonna be 100k.

There's always something else you could do with your money. Why work for a Rolex when you could work for a retirement?

>>17865394
I work to get laid

>>17865260
Why are you mean to me?

>>17865396
This is /wt/, people just are cunts. Get used to it kid.

>>17865394
>20k in Bitcoin is gonna be 100k
hahahahahahahahaha

>>17865395
Then save your 20k for a trip to Moscow to band the porn stars

The 10/10 chicks that do fisting and gape are steep.

>>17865377
Lmfao

>>17865394
>>17865389

>>17865399
See you in in Q4 2024.

>>17865388
it would be pretty hilarious to scam a pawn shop though, if they actually would verify and legitimize and buy it off you, seeing as you get money fast and whatever
wonder what the legal implications are to this if any at all, seeing as it's not my problem if THEY themselves buy it without MY knowledge of it being a fake
the possibilities of this must be damn near 0 though with serial numbers, even a superchinkchinamanclone would not be passable from the controllant at the stores

I still don't have a friend AD that is willing to risk his job and lawsuits approving fakes, that is the major problem
and nobody would buy a supaclone off the street for 10k without papers box, and verification

>it's 1:1 down to the movement details
it's not under a loupe though, ofcourse, depends on what kind of fakes exist now
I've seen a few on yt

>>17865389
>then everyone will just accept that it's real
nobody would buy it under "trust me bro" premises

>>17865391
discontinued..... it's over

>>17865394
literally earn more money

>>17865406
>literally earn more money

No.
Money are only as good as the leisure they get you.

What's the point of being rich if you have to work overtime for it?

>>17865406
>nobody would buy it under "trust me bro" premises
I did not suggest you sell it. I'm not scam anon. When you can afford the real thing, you can give the replica to your kids to play with or something. Or, if you sell, upfront about it being a replica, there's nothing wrong with that.

Which way, /wt/ man?

>>17865409
>What's the point of being rich if you have to work overtime for it?
MUST CONSUUUUUM

>>17865409
if you are kvetching over 10k in rolex, you are poor
how do I know? I am poor
if you say well I can invest it instead, true, but you are still poor and kvetching over a measly 10k
I forget how poor people are actually, not only in money but mindset
>>17865411
>to your kids
hello darkness my old friend...
buying legitimate replicas are very cringe though, homages are gay enough as it is

>>17865401
I only fuck latinas bud

>>17865413
he's right though
the whole point of getting rich is to
>support your family
>do things you enjoy in life without having to worry about starving to death
everyone here doesn't have a family so why wouldn't their next priority be to use their money to enjoy themselves? or do you just live like a bum and let your cash sit around gathering dust?

>>17865418
Well then there's a lot of mulatto ass and coke a Rolex'es worth buy you.

>>17865419
No I bought a house for my family and I'm investing some for the children's future.

>>17865421
that's one of the two options I listed. eventually they'll be all set and on their own feet and then you should enjoy yourself anon

>>17865421
My point was that there's always something better you could do with 20k.

Your perspective is fucking distorted if you consider a 20k to be affordable for anybody whose income is under seven digits.

20k for a shiny blingy thingy? Buy your son a car instead so he'd be fucking the bitches like a king.

>>17865429
I fully agree with you

>>17865405
crypto is dead mate
if you didnt get out in 2022 you will hold those bags forever
btc will at at $0 by the end of the decade

>>17865420
oh don't worry I wasn't the guy talking about buying a rolex, I just interjected
I'm never buying a watch over 2k USD even though I can afford it. I'd rather lay pipe in some brown pussy or work on restoring more cars

>>17865311
How so? It tells time, date, and has alarms. All I needed from a work watch.

>>17865434
>I'd rather lay pipe in some brown pussy or work on restoring more cars

Most based man in /wt/

>>17865432
It has been dead 4 times now, crashed from 20k to 3k and the retards said it was over you'll never see 20k again. Well what do you know now it's over because it crashed from 80k to 20k.

I've been stacking for the last two years and I'm expecting to sell at a very conservative 100k, all things considered the high interest rates are gonna make the 2024 market less rewarding than usual.

>>17865434
Based.

>>17865442
have fun losing all your money lol

>>17865444
We will see.

>>17865342
why is your bf wearing a thong?

Kinda nonsensical comparison. But first paycheck watch, Seiko 5 GMT or Tissot Prx (great offer, not much more than the Seiko)? And if you're asking why I'm considering two cheap watches, it's my very first paycheck. I'm not spending the entire thing on a fucking watch.

is grand seiko reddit tier or somewhat based

>>17865457
>is grand seiko reddit tier or somewhat based
reddit as fuck.

If you can separate the watches themselves from the brand's fans: the watches are fine, very nice dial textures, decent movements, so-so value, bad bracelets, cases that are usually a little too wide or thick.

The brand's fans are typically screechy weebs who make enjoying anything impossible. A lot of the hate for the brand is actually hate for the brand's wearers, but then, the problem is that if you wear one, people will assume you are and treat you as if you were also a screechy weeb.

>>17865460
Ah yes Kevin O'Leary notorious weeb

>>17865230
mirin the legend diver 36. It gives me the vibe of being the son of a millionaire in the 50, who's chilling in an Italian harbor city with his dads yacht in the 50s or 60s. Like the guy from talented mr ripley.

>>17865458
unironically just save 3 paychecks and buy something better
learn from my mistake

>>17865460
>The brand's fans are typically screechy weebs who make enjoying anything impossible.

That's literally the swiss fanboys ITT.

>I have a Seiko
>DID YOU KNOW YOU COULD BUY LONGENES AND HAMILTON? A USED TIDOR PLEASE BUY MY USED TUDOR

There's a lot to appreciate about Grand Seiko, they have their own history, their unique movements, and faces, and a whole lot of identity.

They are getting attacked by the flex culture NPCs for doing their own thing and actually enjoying the watches for the watches rather than lining up to suck THE HERRITAGE out of the old flaccid swiss cock.

>>17865429
there is an endless possibilities of where money can go, a priority ranking where it should go of course
what still remains is that anyone kvetching about 10k is and will remain chronically poor (in body mind spirit and soul)
if you have respect for money you are poor
if you think money is even real you are poor
you are poor
>>17865434
rolex will hold better value than used cars
rolex wins again
>>17865458
money is not real
either way you will still be poor whatever amount you buy
blowing your entire net worth only teaches you that money is a meme and facilitates a grindset attitude to get more
powermatic 80 is a meme movement too no? so the quartz?

>>17865469
>I'm not screechy! It's fans of [something else] that are screechy!
Thank you for providing an an example of a weeb screeching.

>>17865460
kek it took eight minutes between you hitting 'post' and some other anon proving you correct

>>17865470
>If you care about the money you are poor
>Muh Rolex value

(You) are poor.
Rolex I'd fucking udly and sucks dick, and you can't invite a girl to drive her around the track in a Rolex. Can't fuck her in the Rolex backseat either.

The most pathetic thing about the Rolex fanboys is just how badly they care about the speculative value, it's almost like you don't like the watch and can't afford it either.

Why the fuck did you buy a watch you want to sell?

>>17865466
Yeah you know what... you're right. Almost bought a Powermatic 80 Prx.

>>17865470
there's nothing wrong with powermatics

>>17865476
It's not one of the good ETAs either.

Why is the 222 so expensive?
80.000€ asking price
100.000€+ for a 2nd hand model

The Royal Oak and Nautilus start at 30K-35K, why is the 222 almost triple the price?

>>17865469
>That's literally the swiss fanboys ITT.
Truer words have never been spoken

>>17865479
Flex culture and status faggotry.

The luxury items like that are desired for their price, you buy them to flaunt the money so the more it costs the better flex it is.

>>17865479
I think because it was/is a limited production model and there's a lot of speculators assuming VC is going to discontinue it at some point, then prices will shoot up.
Of course, being such a desired model, VC could never make enough to satisfy demand anyway so there's likely always going to be a second-hand mark up until the whole watch market collapses. (two more weeks.)

>>17865470
that's cool and all but I like restoring cars

>>17865432
>crypto is dead mate
>>17865444
>have fun losing all your money lol


If you are so confident why don't you put your money where your mouth is and short Microstrategy?

Think of all the Rollies you could buy with easy money you get.

>>17865466
What I should just get a used DJ? Actually, yeah. Why shouldn't I have one? I'm gonna save up some of my spendable income for a few months.

Good evening watch bros.
Post your watches with your liquor.

>>17865470
Money isn't real, but art pieces precious metals and jewelry are.

>>17865514
No one said you should use money from your first job for a fucking Rolex. But obviously you want to so go ahead.

>>17865226
Victorinox INOX

>>17865515
Hey m8.
Just a beer and some sweets. Comfy night out.

>>17865530
what kind of mutt did you marry there hans

>>17865530
Have a fun night bro.
Bad experience with mythos beer here, you should try Nymfn if you can source it.

>>17865530
ewwww brown skin. stinky.

>>17865531
>>17865537
She's..... Not my wife.
Fuck I am over sharing too much.

>>17865545
Noticed you didn't have the ring lol.
Nomos tangente confirmed as the players timepiece.

>>17865534
Thanks m8. Yeah it's just a starter beer. Not.gonna drink much today, tomorrow though, I'll go all out.

>>17865377
You're seething too much. We can tell.

>>17865547
The only anon who regularly posts women along with his watches. A true chad-king

Just a taste of absolut beauty.

>>17865565
"women"
Germany isn't known for being the center of degeneracy in Europe for nothing.

>>17865573
What's that poorly finished turd in the center?

>>17865573
why do they all look the same

New Damasko dropped. Why the fuck do they all look the same?

>>17865581
They're all based on the same Lemania ebauche except the Lange, just finished to different standards and with different minor modifications made at the factory.

For example, you see the VC (second row, right) replaced the factory balance with a free-sprung balance.

>>17865584
>not in the garbage yet
looks like it needs to be dropped a little further.
I guess they're making progress, though. All the hands are mounted and the watches aren't visibly rusting in this press shot.

>>17865549
>>That Adams apple.

"Women"

>>17865483
>>17865486

so there's really nothing more to it then an extreme markup and prestige?

If I'd shill out 45K for a daytona at least I know that it's a really thin and waterproof chrono, with the AP and the Patek you're getting the Genta design.
But why pay 100K for a Vacheron? What's the usp?

>>17865479
you are comparing 18k gold to steel model watches anon.

>>17865584
Why is the watch on the right not reading 10:09?

>>17865530
ol harry knuckle negro

>>17865605
they took that pic at a different time

>>17865596
>so there's really nothing more to it then an extreme markup and prestige?
>If I'd shill out 45K for a daytona at least I know that it's a really thin and waterproof chrono, with the AP and the Patek you're getting the Genta design.
>But why pay 100K for a Vacheron? What's the usp?

When you're talking about luxury the value proposition never makes sense. It's not 100k worth of gold. It doesn't have 100k worth of man-hours of labor. Is the beauty of the design worth that much? Or the positive feelings you get from owning something you enjoy?

In the case of the 222, a lot of the appeal is that VC resisted the urge to "modernize" the design (i.e. make it 44mm across and 15mm thick and give it a rubber strap) They just re-created the old watch as it was back then, but used updated movement materials.

>>17865549
Did that guy glue sequins to his teeth or something?

>>17865135
>F-91w light is "bad"
>t. YT watch authorities
o rly? here's mine from the 90s made in malaysia, c brought back from the dead with a new (shitty) battery

>>17865584
>Muh minimalist utilitarian field watch

God I hope this doesn't cost more than 300$

>>17865434
Im full remote making six figures and own real estate in eastern europe so why the fuck not get the flex cause disposable cash

Im more concerned about getting it stolen if i fuck around LATAM so I’ll probably just bring a longines or even a quartz shitter

>>17865628
This sucks compared to everything else on the market, this one sided uneven lighting is just ugly and you can barely see the minutes if you squint.

>>17865642
the new amber colored lights they use are pretty based

>>17865642
maybe get your eyes checked

>>17865631
you only get poked for your jewelry if you look like a schmuck lol
let your nuts drag dude

>>17865469
as nice as spring drive is and I might never see it in person I somehow lean more towards normal ticking quartz
what is GS really? designated spring drive or something else?

>>17865631
wear a cheap casio like any other cool person in latam faggot, learn to fit in

>>17865469
rolex and grand seiko are the best

Guys I...

Uhhh......


I bought a Black Bay Ceramic.
Not kidding. On a whim.
I was instantly shocked at how good it feels and I just said that I want it. It's beyond pretty irl and HEAVY (in a good way).

>>17865669
>what is GS really? designated spring drive or something else?

Grand Seiko is a Seiko daughter company making their top end luxury watches with exceptional finish and unique dials. Spring drive is their most famous movement, but they also have a high beat automatic, a plain automatic and even a ticking quartz movement.

>>17865707
More pics soon.

>>17865707
You're building up a pretty decent collection of cope watches.

>>17865707
Retarded piece of shit.

>>17865712
Maybe, I held and wore quite a few rolex before and nothing came close to the feeling of the ceramic black bay.
You should really go and try one out.

>>17865707
Based cheater-anon.
Hope you enjoy your bb.

>>17865720
Thanks m8.
It really is an amazing piece.
I just want a white birch now (SLGA009) and I guess I am set.

>>17865235
Casio has had slim case models for years. Some even before fitbit existed.

>>17865718
I just do not like the look of the Black Bay case. It's crude, slab sided, and way too thick. But you do you.

>>17865707
HOMOS

>>17865473
>Rolex I'd fucking udly and sucks dick
Agree some times, so what watch do you like? the homage shitters before?
>>17865476
youtube told me they were a meme unservicable movement
>>17865479
>why?
because they can sell it for that much
>>17865487
ok
>>17865516
and that is why you consoom
>>17865530
>the homos watch still have stripper brapper residue on it
>it being this close to pastries
>>17865549
mulatta....
>>17865628
>have to hold the little cuck light so it shows
>does not just trigger by a press and hold
>>17865707
>squale
>tudor
same level of copes
>>17865718
>ceramic
seems like a meme material to me

>>17865726
Yeah, you have your ALS cope, your Rolex cope...you've pretty much covered all the major bases of things you can't afford. :^)

>>17865736
Post your watch

Should I pick up a Mint Datejust or an Explorer for my first Rolex?

>>17865754
ass dick tardo

>>17865754
SEXplorer

>>17865628
LED backlight is SOVL

I want to wear my g shock even though I have nicish watch now even just a casio its so light

>>17865754
datejust dude but only if you wear long sleeves a lot

>>17865774
I usually just wear street clothes. Tshirts

>>17865707
You have to be over 30 to post in /wt/ sir

>>17865754
Datejust all the way Jubilee bracelets are extremely comfortable and the Jubilee + fluted WG bezel is utterly classic. Could easily be the last watch you'd ever need.

Explorer is just Submariner-cope. (Plus, it's literally no tougher/sportier than the Datejust.)

Not gonna lie EoE,
I very bored when my wife's at work.

>>17865783
tried cutting yourself faggot?

>>17865219
If yiu get the black one, most people will just think you're wearing a FitBit or Xiaomi fitness band

>>17865785
Not yet no.

>>17865778
more like the last watch he'll ever have when I pull up on him with two glock 40s and give him 80 problems to worry about

>>17865531
>mutt

no mutts, just 400 years of Ottoman heritage (judging by the beer)

>>17865754
VSF DJ or new Clean Explorer 1

>>17865783
Lol, put the ring back into your pocket fren, can't have that out in the open.
Do you often fuck on the side?

>>17865458
Tissot PRX is a great pick if you really want the intergrated bracelet look.
Because if you're looking for something similar but higher end, the only non-AP ones worth getting are
>Zenith DEFY Classic, 6k Euro, or
>GP Laureato, at least 10K Euro

>>17865707
>Black Bay
uh huh, nice
>Ceramic
Ew

>>17865754
The DJ, for the fluted bezel that (I think) no other Swiss brand does.
There are too many good Explorer-likes.

>>17865783
do you have a gay open relationship or are you just a nigger

Are there any 9F GS watches I can reliably find for around $500 and doesn't look like beat up shit?

>>17865458
PRX. Powermatic 80 is several steps above the shit that Seiko sells as movements nowadays in its watches below the 8L55

>>17865733
They're improving om that. The new burgundy BB is 1mm thinner AND has a thinner slab

>>17865816
No. You could get a vintage Grand or King Seiko quartz for that money though. Or just get a Seiko Dolce.

>>17865458
>Seiko 5 GMT
Either save up for a Longines Zulu GMT, or at least get the new Alpinist GMT for a better movement

>>17865776
The DJ is a bling monster. Fags WILL know that you're wearing a Rolex.
Better hope you don't live in the UK or France

>>17865584
Man, Damasko makes me appreciate Sinn so much more.
Experiment a bit with your designs, jesas.

>>17865823
Alpinist GMT is the same shitter movement with a better power reserve

>>17865825
Should I go for the Smooth Bezel Oyster Datejust instead?

>>17865831
It's 6R + GMT, which has better PR, yes, but also better accuracy (different spring) compared to the other one's 4R + GMT.
I'd still go for a Longines at least, but if you prefer Seiko's price range, might as well go for the newer models.

>>17865832
Too plain for me, Might as well pick the Explorer for extra credits if you ever meet a watch nerd.
I'd get a fluted DJ but save it for formal shit.

>>17865837
It's still a caller GMT with terrible accuracy ratings (and QC) for a 1.5k watch. Their 4R GMT watches at a third of the price are actually a better deal

>>17865823
Doesn't Longines just use slightly modified standard ETA stuff?

>>17865847
Are you buying watches based on movements only?
This is not like buying a PC or phone, anon.

>>17865783
gayest thing I’ve seen since the alpinist earlier in the thread.

>>17865847
ETA is exclusive to the Swatch group now & the richest and most innovative manufacturer on the market

>>17865847
Considering it's COSC cert, "slightly modified" is underselling it
>great sizing (39mm, sub 14mm thicc)
>good looking dial that you can wear to events and shit just fine (try that with a Seiko 5 GMT)
>nice brand name
All for the price of, what, 3K?

>>17865851
kek.
Okay that was a good one.
My Kobe thingy is almost ready. Btw.

>>17865861
bruh, post your watch, or GTFO
this is not your blog

>>17865783
>>17865861
you seem kinda weebish, I hope you have a grand seiko too

>>17865861
Based. Enjoy my friend.
Thank you for making the incels seethe, always a pleasure seeing that.

>>17865787
and with a way worse display too

I still don't get why it's called the royal

>>17865832
go for the oyster perpetual

>>17865876
I still don't get why there's a watch brand copying a TV show's name

>>17865857
>Considering it's COSC cert, "slightly modified" is underselling it
Huh, I didn't know those watches are actually chronometers.
Neat.

jomashop took my money and acted like I didn't make a transaction with them

>>17865876
nvm

>>17865832
Is that a new color they're making now? I don't think I've seen this dial color on a datejust before.

>>17865883
lol good rich retard

>>17865856
So why shit on Powermatic?

>>17865857
14mm is thick for a GMT. The Rolex and most of its clones are under 12-13mm.

>>17865250
if you have to think about it, you can't afford it.

>>17865895
I don't. It's a good movement but people educated by youtube get upset that the escapement is synthetic and it's more difficult to regulate than a 2824-2

/wt/ I really like some Breitling's I've seen, but never see anyone talk about Breitling. Are they overpriced/cringe or are they good? Pic related is imo the best looking watch I've ever seen. Also please rec me watches similar to this one.

>brands that will and won’t send me catalogs so far since Friday
Sorry it’s not an autistic excel file but if anyone is interested. I didn’t try Rolex, cartier or Tudor because I have nearby boutiques who had them

>>17865910
Oops. If it’s upside down again this time sorry I’m a gay phoneposter

>brands that will send you catalogs if you use their website/ask
Omega
Breitling
Blancpain
Breguet
Oris
Sinn
Longines
Homos
IWC (magazine)
C. Ward (magazine)


>WILL NOT SEND YOU SHIT / ENVIRONMENTAL PLEDGE GAYNESS
tissot
chopard
hamilton
baume and mercier
tag
panerai
Jury is still out for a few others

>>17865914
>brands that give you catalogs in person from own experience
Rolex (new ones frequently)
Tudor
Cartier
Hublot

>>17865914
nice, let us know about AP, Patek, Lange and JLC

Vodka bros..

>>17865924
JLC is a no. sorry i forgot to include that. I will clean this list up by the end of the week

>>17865135
kinda looks like invicta

>>17865933
not surprising in light of the recent price increases and richemont's stock price

>>17865936
yeah of all the NO's ive gotten so far (I started this last Friday) JLC was most disappointing . They did respond quickly if thats worth anything.

And Blancpain seemed most enthusiastic about sending me their reading material. Breguet in 2nd place

>>17865907
Fugly, all of their watches are on like 20 layers of larp, and the owners are dumb.

I think i'm gonna buy it lads

>>17865957
Eh, alright, it's your funeral.

>>17865907
I really like this one. It looks elegant to me.
Have you ever tried one?

>>17865926
Citizen bro, where you at?

>>17865957
That crown guard is very sexy. How much does this go for?

>>17865549
LMFAO

>>17865980
In the privacy of my home bro. Just trying to entice the resident alcoholics.

>>17865995
That bracelet is very sexy m8.
I'm driving so I can only drink water now.

>>17866008
It's surprisingly comfy, solid links solid end links, doesn't pull any hairs.

>>17865983
220 on Joma 340 from orient

>>17866008
>not taking a driving potion

recommend me a diver for a small wrist
>semenmaster 36mm
dont like the design
>tudor black bay 54
too boring

>>17865977
I have not, just think they look nice

>>17866042
SKX013. They're discontinued though so you'll have to hunt for one.

>>17865957
>everything is perfect
>Except for day date window font
So close but they had to fuck it up

>>17866042
Blancpain Fifty Fathoms Bathyscaphe 38mm

Let me guess, you need more?

>>17865983
WHAT IS THE NAME OF THAT STYLE CROWN GUARD

>>17865957
Do it. And ask them when they will release a rectangular Orient.

>>17865602
but the price difference would be 1kg of gold for a 200g watch. Or is gold that much harder to work with?

>>17865486
>(two more weeks.)
I'll finally get my speedmaster reduced for 1500€then

>>17866065
>40mm diameter 12.5mm thick 3 hand quartz watch
I need less actually.

>>17866042
dumping my old compact diver list, might be outdated now:
Longines Legend Diver small
Longines Hydroconquest 34 mm
Tag Heuer Aquaracer 36 mm
Oris Aquis 36.5 mm
Oris Diver 65 36 mm
Tudor Mini Sub (vintage)
Citizen Eco Drive 33.5 mm
Seiko SKX013 (discontinued)
Nomos Ahoi Neomatik 36 mm
Rolex Yacht Master 37 mm
Marathon MSAR 36 mm

>>17866075
hey baby girl, you in central florida?

>>17866075
36mm Chad... I kneel..

>>17865613
I get the feeling of "nostalgia" but most consoomers won't have even have known of the brand back in the days. If they were even born at that time. Also the brand isn't really that well known over all.
I guess it's one of the "if you know, you know" watches, but I can't even imagine how a sales person would pitch an integrated sports watch with 3atm, three hands and a date function.
If I'd were in the market I'd want more out of a watch then a higher price as the competitors. I'd go with a complicated A Lange und Söhne or something like that...

>>17866065
Fellow bulova chad. I got the red but the grey looks pretty nice

>>17866090
>but I can't even imagine how a sales person would pitch an integrated sports watch with 3atm, three hands and a date function.

I know what you mean and, in fact, before the current hype for them started, regular Royal Oaks and the like would languish, unsold as relics of the 70s with dated styling. (Offshores were really popular, though.) Patek didn't bother making many Nautiluses per year because there was no real demand.

Now, I don't think that any salesman has to work to move a 222. Probably gets more calls than there are watches the factory will ever make.

>>17866093
the australia exclusive is also pretty

>>17866094
guess they actually don't have to do anything to sell those watches and the dealers just happily take their cut for moving a unit.
I thought that I've missed something important about the movement or history or something.

>>17866097
What is the meaning of those squares, triangles and circles for the even weeks?

>>17865754
DJ for sure, explorer is kinda boring compared to it

>>17865783
>HOMOS
>wedding band off while alone at a bar
cringe

>>17865832
Nah, fluted all the way.

>>17866112
I don't see why one is more boring than the other. They're both the watch you draw as a child the first time you doodle a character wearing a watch.

>>17866119
For me it is the sunburst dial along with the jubilee bracelet and fluted bezel that makes it stand out more. Although I kinda prefer the handset on the explorer

>>17865907
Have owned multiple Breitlings. FYI you can get serious discounts from their boutiques if you form a good relationship with them.

They are great watches.

>>17866107
I haven't really thought about that! I've just got the watch as it's pretty and has a calendar week complication.
The first ten markings are circled, next seven are triangles and the last nine are squares, so it's not an even distribution.

>>17865754

>>17866124
I like mercedes hands, too, but the datejust/OP hands are good, too. They look great on the 369 OPs.

>>17866138
Well you better solve this mystery.

>>17865135
damn u NIGGAS still using my 'poorfag guide'? I'll have to refresh it some time I'm sure there's a lot to add and take away

>>17866158
just make it a link to the citizen website lol
recommending anything else is a disservice

>>17866163
I hear that!

>>17865995
what's a cure for a hangover? I had too much wine...

>>17865891
i was trying to get a $50 invicta lmao
I'm just going to get this straight from Casio though

another great /wt/ with all new content and none of the same memes repeated over and over

Here it is.

>>17866173
I forgot the non-58 BBs even existed

>>17866173
damn, she thicc

>>17866173

>>17866180
Not that much, really.

>>17866185
How much did you pay?

>>17866181
Oh boy, look at that complete lack of finishing. If that's what they're going to show off, they might as well have just given it a closed back.

>>17866180
14.5mm. That's beyond thick. That's a chunk. That's bordering on Planet Ocean thickness lel.

>>17866185
looking forward to the sequel: stripper + BB pic

>>17866195
All richfags should compete in who can take the best stripper/watch combo for the poorfags' enjoyment.

>>17866201
>stripper/watch combo
*pic

>>17866201
>A Homos and a Toopoor
>Rich
Boy, standards sure have fallen around here with Mortadello gone.

>>17866166
nvm it's ion plated brass
where the hell do I get a plain stainless steel dress watch with 40mm dial, mineral glass etc. in the $50-100 range, preferably from an ad or ebay/amazon/walmart

>>17866223
orient bambino

>>17866232
I don't want a mechanical watch.

>>17866223
eBay has a ton of options if you hit more filters. There appears to be a very good deal on a similar Casio to your first pic

>>17866237
I don't trust casio to give me a stainless steel case and have seen them mistakenly advertised as having such.

heavy aged meme watch

>>17866237
My bad, it's a citizen.
BI1031-51X

>>17866244
I like it. I feel so gimped in this price range lol but that seems to be as good as it gets

>>17866250
Bro, ultimately you want something practical that's going to fit what you're going to wear most of the time and have some versatility. You can save up and get something nice but get what you like and what you can afford and what makes sense to you.
Trust me 99% of people won't think twice about your watch.

>>17866188
Too much for a watch. I could've bought 8 renault twingos instead.
>>17866194
1mm of the thickness is only from the glass. And it being black, even smaller wrists like mine can wear it nicely. They hide the size really well.
>>17866195
Well, let's see.

>>17866223
AP Royal Oak

>>17866251
I know, I just mean in terms of style and material expectations, the watch industry doesn't meet me at my price range, it expects me to spend 3* as much

To the anon who wanted one and was going to pay scalper prices for it: lucky you

u guys think the seiko 5 gmt will be a future classic like the skx was?

>>17866265
who's making them?

>>17866299
China. When it's microbrands it's 100% China.

I'm a laborer and keep fucking up my phone by carrying it with me.

I dress western style, denim and cowboy boots. What sort of watch should I get? Seems like g shock is most durable but that big ugly plastic thing will probably look like shit with wranglers and carhart

>>17866295
>future classic
Not a chance. The Weekdater might though.

>>17866306
Put it on a bund strap and you're good.

>>17866300
yeah, but which chinese brand?

>>17866315
I could just tell people if I wanted to suck cock, but thanks for contributing.

>>17866306
yeah just get a gshock with accents of your favorite color and call it a day

>>17866306
there are metal g-shocks too

>>17866306
Rolex

>watch any gmt review video
>10 minute autistic screed about 'true' gmt vs caller gmt

>>17866352
People act like this is a way bigger deal than it is. Yeah, true GMT is a little faster and easier, but how often are you changing time zones that it really matters? If you're constantly on transcontinental travel then sure, but even then if your flight or train ride is 2 or more hours you have plenty of time while you're sitting there to fiddle with your watch. What else are you going to be doing?

>>17866365
totally agree. like take those 5 minutes after you've landed but while you're still waiting to get off the plane. perfect time to set your watch

Black bay? More like Black Gay lol

>>17866201
Don't tempt me.

unironically what are some "premium" quartz options that aren't fucking ugly in the 700-1000 USD range? I'm honestly tired of getting shit serviced lol. bonus for solar
>eco-drive you retard
I said not ugly. Citizen stuff just has so many unnecessary complications

>>17866065
I would quite like if the second hand on a lunar pilot was a second hand not a chronograph second hand.
You got this smooth movement on a quartz and can't fucking see it unless using a chronograph this is so stupid.

>>17866396
>Citizen stuff just has so many unnecessary complications
What?
Look up citizen stiletto, they don't even have date to make it thinner.

Also consider Oceanus, some of their models are just date.

>>17866405
I already own like 3 stiletto refs

>>17866396
Save up a little more and get a GS 9f.
>50 year service interval, can easily change the battery on your own every
>± a year
>conservative looking with strong attention to detail

I own pic rel and absolutely love it. I've stored it away for months, and still keeps perfect time when I pull it out.

>>17866396

>>17866409
The most chad quartz.

>>17866396
>unironically what are some "premium" quartz options that aren't fucking ugly in the 700-1000 USD range?
None, they're 3-5k (Astron and Breitling).

gentlemen, the time to start a new thread is past.

>>17866409
I was too drunk typing this
>can easily change the battery on your own every 10 years or so
>± 10 sec a year

>>17866419
I bake

NEW
>>17865135
NEW
>>17865135
NEW
>>17865135

>>17866409
niggas really paying 2 grand for this aliexpress lookin shit

ACTUAL NEW
>>17866427
ACTUAL NEW
>>17866427
ACTUAL NEW
>>17866427

>>17866306
reverso

>>17865746
I don't wear one but I am considering it again because the sheer utility and giving up the pocketwatch life
>>17865754
>Explorer
good that it comes in 40
>DJ in 41
Introduces clutter on the dial
>DJ in 36
possibly too tiny for men
>Explorer
has actual security clasp oyster so you don't get cucked
>DJ
does not have it
>Final answer
buy a date sub
>>17865771
lightness feels cheap though
>>17865795
do they make custom or sterile dials
that is the real question
>>17865823
>Longines Zulu GMT
date in 6 spot... it's over
>>17865907
the avenger mogs the naviboomer
I thought breitling was dying years ago with some report, apparently not
all polished, it's a notorious boomer/car salesman/pizzeria watch though
>>17865953
the zoomies fear the actual waterproof chronographs
>>17866166
>i was trying to get a $50 invicta lmao
amazon has the PRO DIVER (the only invicta u need)
>I'm just going to get this straight from Casio though
why did casio add the extra clutter numbers
>>17866306
invicta pro diver
>>17866409
someone said gs has bad bracelets now I am starting to rethink if they are chad indeed

>>17866306
Get a metal Gshock.

>>17866396
Bulova Jet Star is the chad's choice

>>17866396
>>17866097

>>17866545
>avenger mogs the naviboomer
this shit looks like 2003 in physical form. You are wrong. Simple as.

>>17866798
multiple bbc male adult actors have worn the super avenger to my recollection
jerry seinfeld wore the naviboomer
I rest my case
which side are you on?

>>17866843
I'm going with the Jew on this one desu

>>17866916
so you are on their side, I see how it is

>>17866843
How do you know what BBC porn stars are wearing, anon?

Watch noob here. Got gifted this beauty, anyone knows what this is? Couldn’t find this model, maybe a fake, idk.

Better picture

>>17867401
>>17867390
Who gave you this?

>>17867406
Got it from an relative of mine, who happens to be a freemason

>>17867390
It's cryptonazi shit. Better throw it away

>>17867401
chink fake

>>17867152
to be a watch enthusiast, you must first become a bbc porn enthusiast
don't ask me, I didn't make the rules