/fa/ - Fashion

Thoughts on Ressence? I like how they look, cool concept as well

First for do not make yourself a target of the goat-fuckers. Don't buy a women's watch.

>>17806742
They are cool. Super expensive for what they are but I think they're unique enough to justify it (at least as much as you can justify a luxury watch). I would like to buy one eventually but it's pretty low on my priority list.

Why are seiko fans obsessed with this retro watch that makes you look like a creepy dude from the 1960s?

>>17806742
cool but too expensive for us normalfags. If I had millions of dollars and didn't know how to spend it, maybe

>>17806742
Cool concept, but grossly overpriced (they're $45,000) with complications that nobody actually wants. Their design team was going for that super minimalist design while making the dial way too busy.

Looking at the time and date on that, is it 10:11am, and the tenth? What are they 2 other sub dials? Why do I ever want to know the temperature on my wristwatch? Again, neat concept where the multiple dials and rings all spin independently but still legible by the wearer. Plus the oil-filled nonsense just gives it a really unique look. But they'll never sell any in meaningful quantities.

Lookup "hydromod" for watches. Its filling your case with mineral oil. It changes the viewing angle and sometimes makes dials really pop. Plus since its full of oil it cannot get water intrusion and will never corrode. BUT its a pain in the dick if you ever have to service the watch, and if it starts leaking out you have a perpetually oily watch that leaks on your skin and clothes until you disassemble it all, refill, and make it oil-tight again.

There was an anon in /wt/ that hydromodded his watch. Said it was neat but would never do it again after getting a bubble in it.

>>17806746
forced meme staler than the dorito under your couch

>>17806742
I like the aesthetic but these look like they would be a massive pain to set. It's operated by one sliding bezel on the back and handwind iirc.

>>17806761
>What are they 2 other sub dials?
oil temperature and day of week (orange = weekend)

>>17806754
>>17806756
Type 1 is like 15k which is quite expensive but not "high end watchmaking" tier

>>17806761
I love the gauges, they look "high tech" but not in an obnoxious way like RM for example
I agree that they don't seem very practical, but they're more afforable than you said and frankly I don't think any other watchmaker does this kind of design which really sets them apart imo

>>17806765
The cool one (type 3) is 38,000 CHF.

STOP
MAKING
WATCH
THREADS

Generals were a mistake. It's the same """discussions""" and shitposting over and over. These threads are fucking cancerous. You're like hamsters trapped in their wheels.

>>17806770
They're all cool but yes type 3 is the best one

>>17806764
What a moronic day indicator. But whats the 6 o'clock subdial then?

>>17806767
I think the part that miffs me most about it is it looks like that pixel smart watch because of the oil and exact machining tolerances. But why would you want your mechanical or quartz watch to look more like a smart watch?

>>17806755
only one obsessed here seems to be you, eh?

>>17806782
Not really, the display ends up looking pretty different irl since it's not a screen. I guess it's the dial layout that looks like an app but I like it, everything being in little gauges that move around gives it charm

>>17806734
Niggas be like "Wow! Is that a... FP Journe??!?"

>>17806772
>shitposting over and over
That's the point. Keep circular discussion in generals so the rest of the board can be "is X effay?" and "What is this jacket?" You're welcome, enjoy your amazing discourse.

>>17806786
I understand its not a screen, it just -looks- like a smart watch.

>>17806772
I really feel trapped, part of me knows i don't need another watch, but i keep looking and talking about them.

>>17806782
>But why would you want your mechanical or quartz watch to look more like a smart watch?
Why indeed

>>17806782
>But whats the 6 o'clock subdial then?
Seconds

i kinda want to buy the 856 utc (black version) but it's always sold out when i check

>>17806796
>That endlink gap

reposting this to piss off the ''ugly as sinn'' poster in the other thread.

I wish you a terrible day my friend!

>I eco-drive

>>17806796
>Spring bars are visible through sloppy lug to bracelet fit
YIKES

Dunno why Sinn gets a lot of respect in watch circles. Other than the special metal they say they use (whatever that is). Their watches look crude and cheap.

>>17806805
>Their watches look crude and cheap


thats the reason why they are popular. Just like the f91w

>>17806801
You could get a bus through the gap in that end link. Ugly as sinn

>>17806801
And there's a pube on it

>>17806803
I think everyone had a sinn phase until they realized how fugly and cringe they are

maybe i buy cope for not wanting to play the rolex game

>>17806805
>Their watches look crude and cheap. Got friends who own Sinns, their watches look and feel extremely solid in person.

>>17806820

>>17806810
>>17806813
yet they are still popular. keep seething.

>>17806805
>Their watches look crude and cheap.
Got friends who own Sinns, their watches look and feel extremely solid in person.

>>17806805
the oil filled quartz watch is kinda cool but the autos are just confusing. why would anyone want that? it just doesn't make sense.

>>17806824
Daniel Wellingtons are also popular. What's your point?

>>17806746
obesity is no joke anon. it increases your risk for heart disease, strokes, type 2 diabetes and some cancers, which are all among the leading causes for premature death. you can change something, even if it doesn't seem like it. as little as going for a 30min walk every day and drinking water instead of soda can make a huge difference. it's never too late to get in shape!

got this bad boy today

>>17806822
I don't think anyone is going to defend an AT purchase w/ the moon thing

>>17806801
>"tool" watch
how the fuck is this a tool watch

>>17806831
nice! everyone should have one imo

>>17806833
a watch you wear while working or doing some activity, a watch that will get scratch, a watch that is easy to read, a watch that is robust.

6.5 inch wristlet. Should I get a BB54 or 36mm Explorer? I think I like the BB54 more, I'm just worried about feeling the Rolex cope every time I look at it.

>>17806805
>Dunno why Sinn gets a lot of respect in watch circles
Shilling is not respect.

>>17806841
define shilling

>>17806836
buying a $2000 automatic watch to wear while "working" is like buying $1000 leather boots and indigo dyed antique japanese denim jeans as "workwear", it's a dumb larp. as long as you're self aware about it you're alright in my book but please, don't act like this has anything to do with practicality

>>17806838
The BB54 is not that great for wristlets because it square-ish. Also, the hype for BB54 died real fast.
Get the Rolex.

>>17806844
He didn't say manual job.
For office jobs, watches are the best flex.

>>17806844
you're free to spend your money how ever you want. Some people love to work in expensive boots, some people like to draw with 1$ pencils and other like to paint with 500$ bruches. If the way other people spend their money bother you, thats your problem Anon. Sort this shit out of your system.

>>17806849
>>17806844
Also, people who buy those watch, they don't buy it for you, they buy the watch for themselves and are so happy with them that they want to post pictures of it. Tomorrow they'll probably still be happy and you will remain in your corner, raging over something you have absolutely no control. Their happiness makes you angry and sad simple as. IMO you are on the loosing side of this.

Moral of the story, wear and buy whatever you want and don't give a shit about anyone's opinion.

>>17806846
do you already have other watches? the Explorer is sportier and the BB is more a diver type of watch.

>>17806853
>they buy the watch for themselves
status signaling cope

>>17806855
I alternate between a gshock and an older sarb Alpinist. Whichever watch I end up getting would probably be my "one" watch though. I get that the BB and Explorer are functionally and aesthetically different, but I enjoy both.

>>17806859
well if you buy watches for other people, don't expect nothing otherwise you'll be at their mercy. Good luck and have a nice life.

>>17806864
Do you want the Rolex just because it has the Rolex logo? Cause if not, in my opinion, aesthetically speaking, the Rolex is more similar to the Alpinist than the BB. So if you're in it just for the design of the dial, I'd prefer to have versatility in my collection and go with Tudor.

>>17806869
>Do you want the Rolex just because it has the Rolex logo
a little bit yeah. I think I'd really prefer a small diver, but I know I'd regret not getting a rolex

>>17806835
I'd have one if they weren't $120 or therabouts. $50-70 I'd probably have both models I want. I'm not really understanding why they're priced over $100 when Casio has been making them out of plastic and LCDs for 30 years.

>>17806889
98 bucks on amazog right now

>>17806848
>office job
>10000 meters WR and gorilla warfare tegimented
right, because pressing the mute button on your plantronics while you take a sip of your shitty office coffee is much more harmful to a watch than going to the opera house, you're underage aren't you

>>17806853
>they buy the watch for themselves
I didn't know there were still people who used this phrase without ironic intent. do you also say shit like "horological virtue"?

>>17806897
who do you buy the watch for nigga? If you want to show off, buy a Ferarri car or any other expansive car not a watch. Buy a mansion nigga, no one gives a fuck about your wrist trinkets. You buy a watch for yourself, if you buy a watch to show off you are retarded beyond retardation.

>>17806899
you're way too butthurt about this for me to not be right

really want 36 explorer as well but it's probably damn near impossible to get it now

>>17806910
there's a bunch on c24 though?

>>17806831
I've had this one for a month now. I love it but the pice of shit has never recieved the multiband signal since I've had it.

>>17806910
I've always heard it was one of the easier watches to get from an AD

>>17806920
skill issue

>>17806894
That's the old version though. The updated version is consistently around 20 dollars more so might as well get that one. Or you could just get the battery version for 50 dollars.

>>17806925
Amazon doesn't differentiate the old/new versions when shipping. At least they didn't about a year ago. I ordered the old version at a cheaper price and they sent me the new one.

>>17806912
>secondary market

>>17806921
how long would you have to wait though? mine told me years

>>17806934
years for an explorer is ridiculous, try another AD. Everything I've seen online makes it seem like people can get them as walk-ins or in a couple months

>>17806836
mech watches aren't to be worn while working due to hit virbration

>>17806946
pussy

>>17806905
thats not how debates works brainlet.

I want a square watch. Post some pls. I don't know if I like the Longines one and the hamilton one looks off to me.

>>17806956
There are only two square watches: the Tank (gold) and the Reverso.
Everything else is cope.

This might sound retarded but you guys translate time into numerical form in your head when you're reading analog watch?

>>17806974
yes but it's instant and i dont have to think about it

>>17806956
If you want a tank/reverso, get a tank/reverso

Buying a 2k watch you kinda like instead of a 3.5k watch you love isn’t frugal, it’s retarded

That said, the Oris rectangular is fucking sexy

>>17806974
I start by knowing what hour it is naturally, just by not being a beet loser I know the hour. Then when I look at my watch I just look at the minute hand and based on where it is I know the time

>>17806983
Reversos are 3.5k holy shit wear?

>>17806982
Reversos are 3.5k holy shit wear?

>>17806746
No worries brother.
I'd never buy a sissy's watch.

Stop wearing Casio watches.

>>17807021
nah i love my a700

>>17807021
No

>>17807021
no thanks, faggot

I just want a rolly rolly rolly with a dab of ranch

Convince me not to get this chinese shitter

>>17806956
Sitizen Stlitto

>his watch is non-binary
are you one of those LGBT, anon

>>17806953
you must be new to the internet fartknuckle

Happy saturday, lads.

the newest collab with a streetwear brand gives you.. the poop colored gshock

>>17807123
>poop colored gshock
Seriously why?

The "multi-color metal" series might actually be cool though.
>>17807130
Who knows, I don't really know how streetware brands work, but they all seem to generate hype off of random and/or awful looking colors.

What the best mechanical watch that costs between $500 and $1000?

>>17807149
really depends on the style you're going for, a lot of them use the same few movements at that price range anyways

>>17807149
best at what

>>17807149
honestly probably some swatch group watch from tissot, hamilton or mido

>>17807152
I'm going for a style that I can wear on most occasions, since it's going to be my first one.

>>17807153
Best at "value for money" mainly

>>17807160
I'd say Squale 1521 for a dive watch, has a 500m WR rating and some legit history. Hamilton for a field watch. Jomashop still has some Alpina Heritage divers for like 800usd, I like mine a lot and at that price it's pretty hard to beat. Like the other guy said Swatch group has a bunch of stuff in that price range that would meet your requirements.
https://www.jomashop.com/alpina-seastrong-diver-automatic-brown-dial-mens-watch-al-525brc4h4.html

>>17807160
Hamilton Khaki Field is the generic first watch option. I like the King Auto personally.

>>17807170
Guess it helps if I include a picture. Black dial and a bracelet makes it a legitimate any occasion watch.

>>17807160
Hamilton khaki field, Tissot Powermatic 80 (doesn't have to be prx), seiko sarx

>>17806772
hello newfag to 4chan.

>>17807149
Possibly a Hamilton

>>17807149
Get one for <500.
There's usually no discernible difference to (you) for stuff ranging from about 250 to 1k+.
>b-but I saf uppies one grand my grandma gave me for birfday...
Don't care retard. Save up more. 500 to $5000 is the shitterzone of mountains of nigh indistinguishable insipid shit over and over made in china with a different logo slapped on. Just cut out the middleman and go full unabashed chink for 250.
Buying in the shitterzone almost always is a cope for something grander you actually want and usually results in regret.
Ask the anon itt who's trying desperately to get rid of the pile of shitters he misguidedly bought over the years.
This is especially pertinent to understand since you're asking such a basic ass question meaning you don't know shit. Don't spend 1k on anything if you have to come to the 3rd most homo board on this shitty site for info about mens boomer jewelry.

>>17807249
>no stubby half-index near the date window
>disgusting meteorite style print
>numerals are much thinner than the indexes
>another fucking diver

HIDEOUS, DISGUSTING!

What is /WT/'s opinion on Swatch watches?

>>17807276
at least it's better than casio

>>17807276
I think sistem 51 is pretty interesting from the technological standpoint, but otherwise I don’t really get the appeal

I want an MR01 so bad but the damn thing is 36mm, it wont look right on my 7.5 inch wrist

>>17807284
i've got one as my banger watch it's surprisingly resilient and accurate

>>17807287
Yes it will.

did anyone here actually buy a SwatchPain? looked like 90% of the people in line for them were just resellers who had no idea what a Fifty Fathoms was

>>17807291
I don’t believe you, nobody wants to bang a swatch owner

>>17807241
>implying there is a mechanical watch that costs < $500 and is anywhere near to quality and looks of the Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 ($700)

>>17807276
Based
Awesome
Makes haters seethe

>>17807287
Don't fall for the women's size meme, bro.

>>17807295
>did anyone here actually buy a SwatchPain? looked like 90% of the people in line for them were just resellers who had no idea what a Fifty Fathoms was
I don't think the sales on these were as good.

Blancpain is not a well-known brand, the cost is higher than the Moonswatch, and I think a lot of people were turned off by the hype-cycle of the last one.

>>17807300

Nice -- I've always enjoyed their automatics. Currently own one like (pic) and others.

>>17807310
the lines I saw on IG still looked huge even though every person they asked if they'd heard of Blancpain said no or they just heard of them like 2 hours before they showed up

>>17807298
>soimatic 80
>quality
lol
lmao

Impulse bought this Prospex today

>>17807333
not bad. very clean. dig the waffle.

>>17807169
>squale
>hamilton
>alpina
>jomashop

god damn we got not one but four poorfag options here! Might as well go to macys or aldi if you’re some euro subhuman. A better option would be applying for a job at one of these places so your not forced to buy some ugly 4:25 date (((Swiss))) cope shitter.

>>17807338
buddy was asking for budget options, post your collection

Why do mechanical watches have assymetrical accuracy?
Like why is it always something like +3/-2 seconds instead of +2/-2 or +3/-3?
Is it like because we remove the watch before bed and we sleep about a third of the day instead of half of it?

>>17807355
keep seething, faggot

>>17807359
moon landing was faked

>moon landing was fake
>trust the plan

>>17807357
Because metal fluctuates with the temperature and the temperature fluctuates during the day. Especially during the period when you aren't wearing the watch and it cools down from not being in contact with your skin.

>>17807355
Is that a troon or a lowtest soi "male"?
Shitty meme either way.
This
>>1780735
is worse and reeks of cope and foxgrapes.

At this rate I think you're both the same fag samefagging yourself to satisfy your schizo need for interaction.

>>17807317
>implying
I have it for 3 weeks now without setting the time and it is still bang on to the second.

>i fucking love science bro
>i get all my science from reddit bro
>we totally went to the moon with calculator level of computing power 80 years ago bro
>we cant go anymore because we lost the technology bro
>bro who handled that technology forgot where he put it so we cant go anymore bro
>do you want to go to kennedy space center tomorrow and scream and REEEE when musks new rocket explodes again bro?

>>17807241
>Ask the anon itt who's trying desperately to get rid of the pile of shitters he misguidedly bought over the years.

Yes, I'm one of those anons. This is seriously the best advice that you can get.

>>17807287
I'd get it if it had a sapphire. No sapphire no buy

>>17807377
Oh wow mine usually loses about 4 seconds a day

>>17806772
I thought the hamsters liked their wheels.

>>17807378
Who are you quoting?

>>17807130
There's money to be made in India.

>first time going to rolex ad
>concerned about rolex horror stories
>treated like a king
>leave with cool rolex giftbag
>go to cartier
>fatass cartier ad answers questions in the most basic robotic answers and seems uninterested in selling watches
Im beginning to think Rolexfags were right all along

>>17807378

>>17806953
fatknuckle lol, I'd beat the shit out of you IRL you greasy keyboard schmuck.

>>17807108
fatknuckle lol, I'd beat the shit out of you IRL you greasy keyboard schmuck.

>>17807287
>''hey thats a nice dial for a microbrand !''
>*Chingzhou movement*
>''...nevermind''

FOR ME ITS THE BUTTPLUG HOUR HAND!

>>17807371
>At this rate I think you're both the same fag
This guy has been shitting up the thread ever since his Rolex got blown the fuck out by some lawyer with a real collection

Big watches kinda look cringe pham

You look like you are wearing a buckler

Already got the first two.

>>17807478
only if you have little baby wrists

>>17807473
I mean, joke aside, it's a nice ''vintage'' looking watch for the price.

>>17807474
The other guy's been seething like there's no tomorrow since he found out he spent swiss money on a reddit meme made in thailand.
Dunno which fag is worse.

>>17807478
That's a dainty little girl's wrist.
LMAO

>>17807487
>The other guy's been seething like there's no tomorrow since he found out he spent swiss money on a reddit meme made in thailand.
which one is that?

convince me not to buy this gents
naoya hida style at a fraction of the price, and from a swiss house with a legacy instead of nipponese microbrand

>>17807497
whats your SOTC?

What wristwatch embodies being a chronic shitposter?

>>17807505
Rolex

>>17807497
>40mm
NICE

>>17807497
I like the new small seconds version

>>17807530
>>17807497
what is the best dress watch in the same price range but not from Longines?

>>17807539
patek philippe nautilus

Ball's on your wrist

hey /fa/ggots, i need a new strap
i'm looking for 20mm leather but a rich vibrant forest green color, where should i look? been using a rios1931 but it's black and getting pretty old

>>17807379
ruined by the garbage disk colors

>>17807544
Hirsch

>>17807530
it looks cheap and aliexpress tier irl

>>17806831

came in the male yesterday

>>17807497
I like it very much, it looks great.

>>17807543
Are those minute markers tubes as well? If so that's quite cool.

>>17807473
same for me

What style of watch would best suit a manager at a drug store

>>17807623
Timex

>>17807623
Golden Rolex.

>>17807623
Soviet diver.

>>17806822
Alternative cut.

>>17807624
>>17807625
Neither of those are really styles

>>17806936
Interesting. What stores or in what country?

>>17807592
i am sure you did anon

>>17807623
Invicta.

>>17807621
cheapo chink buttplug, even better!

Sinn bros, we just keep winning!

>>17807623
Ironman-like digital watch with frayed nylon straps

With watches now becoming smaller, can we also expect thin watches to make a return? Thin=comfy.

anyone bought metal mod kits from aliexpress for their gshocks? any recommendations for the best quality ones? is the g-refit store like the main/best one or is there something better?

Here's your PRX bro

>>17807665
Here's your PRX bro

>>17806801
Hope they make a 36mm version

>>17807671
Stillcan't believe this is actually a think, it looks so cheap and poorly thought out.

>>17807473
>"Hey can you make a watch without those snowflake hands"
> "sure buddy here you go"
> "wow.... Thanks.....I guess"

The best diver ever made after the Rolex Submariner, period. Also I would argue it’s the best diver to come out in the last 40 years. Get one senpai

Shill me a nice leather strap maker. Need black and brown. Don’t mind paying more for quality.

>>17807730
Hirsch

>>17807169
>new alpina
Yikes!

For me, it’s 1950s shit and piss alpina

>>17807725
I like it better than the sub except for the small teeth on the bezel

>>17807750
and the mat finish

Based chinkmartin

>>17807577
naoya hida on life support lol

do you guys know any cool (budget) watches that have gold accents?

>>17807479
nice cope collection. if you look from really far away it seems like its worth 100k
>calatrava
>explorer
>sub
>daytona
>tank

>>17807768

>>17807775
Yeah no shit, dickhead. You know the names of the most popular watches in the world, well done

>>17807627
she wouldnt have cucked him and betrayed him if he wore a ROLEX

connery wore a ROLEX and no woman ever cheated on him

>>17807725
it is uncomfortable and looks like a slob

>>17807725
i just dont like the bulky dive watch look
why did super compressors go out of fashion?

>>17807784
Damn that's a sexy Long Jeans

>>17807621
>Metallic lume filled numerals
Mogs half of the watches in existence including that Tudor.
>The metallic numerals are same exact width as the line indexes
MOGS EVERYTHING.

Stop for a moment and admire this moment. This watch dabs on anything the Swiss ever made. Look at some shitty explorer and then at this san martin, absolute swiss humiliation. What a fucking embarassment.

>>17807784
>why did super compressors go out of fashion?
Divers preferred a simple rotating bezel in the Blancpain style to the internal crown that has to be manipulated via a crown. Harder to do when wearing gloves.

>>17807790
What a weird fucking point. I like symmetry too but the 3 6 9 aren't meant to be equal thickness to the indicies.

>>17807042
band?

>>17807021
No

seiko bros oh no no no no

https://youtube.com/shorts/EUx9ALqlNdE

>>17807021

>>17807805
>I like symmetry too but the 3 6 9 aren't meant to be equal thickness to the indicies.

It's definitely a better aesthetic. Imagine you're printing something and the font is fucked up with numbers being thinner than the the letter it's just odd and unattractive. It's a glaring design fuckup.

If it was Casio or some bargain bin brand you could say "oh well they used whatever indexes they already had on hand, can't expect an all tailored 200$ watch" but this is supposed to be premium.

>>17807790
>The metallic numerals are same exact width as the line indexes
Probably a cost saving thing

>>17807856
>Probably a cost saving thing
They used 1 for every index, but unlike Rolex they actually made a custom 2 for 12. Meanwhile Rolex has a stupid triangle instead. I bet a 2 costs more than a triangle does.

And the end result of using uniform shapes just looks so much better.

If you have numerals on your watch you are a child. Learn to read a fucking watch. The explorer is absolutely gross and possibly the ugliest watch rolex make

>>17807828
Old man who takes part in the most consumerist of hobbies calling other people sheep..

>>Ironic.

>>17807854
>it's just odd and unattractive. It's a glaring design fuckup.
I have this feeling most watches are deliberately designed with a flaw that makes them a bit ugly, you rarely see a perfectly designed watch. Like the date window on picrel. Most people don't seem to mind though and just keep buying them.

>>17807819
What's the one on the right?

>>17807464
How up did you dress?

>>17807878
He dressed left not up.

>>17807873
Thr new one, lf20w.

Post beautiful casebacks

>>17807872
>Like the date window on picrel.
It's actually a good call to balance out the logo.
>Power reserve across from the subdial
>date window across from the FP logo

It's a well thought out design.

>>17807888
Imagine the smell after the recesses get caked with the grime.

Affordable. Luxury.

>>17807849
>4k for a g-shock

WTF were they thinking?

I just think it looks cool :)

Recommend a Swiss sports watch with an in house movement up to 5 thousand monopoly euros

No Tudor or other entry level shit brands

>>17807909
The Seamaster font is wrong. You bought a fake.

>>17807917
>up to 5 thousand monopoly euros
>No entry level shit brands
nice try

>>17807920
From the Omega store? Brand new with the paperwork?

>>17807928
>4chan

>>17807917
5k is by definition entry level

anyone know when new g-shocks come out?

>>17807938
Every day

>>17807901

>>17807928
>From the Omega store? Brand new with the paperwork?
Just because you say that it doesn't make it true. That font is fucking wrong. It looks like Comic Sans. Not even joking with you. You knowingly bought a replica didn't you?

>>17807909
My god is that fake. Why are you doing this here posting replicas and fakes? The font isn't even the correct color. I believe only the ceramic came with white Seamaster font, and that doesn't have a date. And is obviously ceramic. Holy shit I hope you knew what you bought and didn't pay Omega prices.

>>17807936
Eat shit dude. It really is fake. I could spot that being fake from a mile away and I didn't even remember the font color without looking it up.

>>17807955
Same exact font you raging autist. BTW the picture isn't yours so you're just mad anon has a cool watch.

>>17807964
It's not the same font and it's not even the right color. The font on his replica is much more bold everywhere. The bezel font is all wrong too. The triangle at 12 is way too bold.

No shit I don't have the new wave dial, I don't particularly like it. I do own two Omegas and one of them is far more expensive than his though. And I own other more expensive watches too.

>>17807790
Are you really that fucking retarded or just new?

>>17807964
>Same exact font you raging autist.
Since when is caring about not buying a fake being a fucking autist you mouthbreathing fuckup?

That watch has
>wrong color Seamaster logo
>wrong font everywhere (too bold)
>helium escape wart looks too small
>bezel font looks printed not engraved / embossed like the real ones

I could go on. There are many things wrong with that watch.

>>17807828
Kek he's absolutely fucking right

>>17807768
I found this. Do you think it's too tacky fashion-watch-like?

>>17807891
Finally, somebody who understands design and isn't totally retarded.

>>17807909
Okay now I know what happened. Someone sold you a fake and you knowingly or unknowingly bought it. That color combination is exclusive to the ceramic case no date Seamaster. It matches the font color and bomb ticker seconds hand tip. But that watch has no fucking date, and it has a black ceramic case. Yours has a date and is steel.

Holy fucking shit I hope you kept the receipt because you need to sue that AD if you really bought it there.

>>17807978
Nah, enjoy things without worrying too much. It's not like if you wearing an embarrasing plastic casio or a san shartin.

>>17807891
The line going up towards 12 o'clock is completely unneccessary and is off center to boot.

>>17807828
Turd opinion. His point is about the movement but he doesn't say what gs he opened.. was it quartz, auto, spring drive, was it new (doubt so it was prolly old) and since he's a youtuber he could make a video about it but he won't.

>>17807872
your feeling is wrong

it's obvious that watch had it's movement made first and then the dial adjusted to cope with what they had made

>>17808015
It's ok anon, you don't have to get your pants knotted. Just accept Gay Sexko movements are universally shitty, unless going for the most expensive and unaffordable, and move on. Peace.

>>17807896
nice dinner plate. now that's a tool watch you can wear at fancy parties and eat of

>>17808019
i have had 3 cheap soikos and it's been 2spd
what's universally shitty about that?

and if you dont address my valid points you should eat shit

>>17808031
>I have had 3 cheap soikos
We're talking about "Grand" Soiko.
Soikos are ok for the price. Learn to read.

>>17808034
>We're talking about "Grand" Soiko.
THEYRE FUCKING SHIT AND IM TIRED OF HEARING OF THEM

I DONT GIVE A SHIT ABOUT YOUR JAPANESE COPE FOR SWISS WATCHES

FUCK GRAND SHITKO

FUCK TURDOR

FUCKG ALL YOUR ENTRY LEVEL COPE FUCK IT TO HELL AND STOP TALKING ABOUT IT HERE

>>17807920
>>17807955
>>17807960
>>17807965
>>17807992
Looks real to me, assmad clown
https://www.omegawatches.com/en-us/watch-omega-seamaster-diver-300m-co-axial-master-chronometer-42-mm-21030422010001

>>17807992
>AD
I got it from the Omega Boutique in NYC lol

>>17808039
You seriously don't see that the font on his watch is bold while the reference isn't?

It's fucking fake and he's lying. Why do you care?

>>17808042
>Why do you care?
It's obviously the same fakeposter

>>17808019
>Seiko are widely praised for the top tier faces, best hands, dials and indexes
>muh movement
Moving the goalposts right there. Seiko is praised for the best faces and you can't address that so you start talking about movement.

Ok so you say the movement is mid? Compared to what? Lange? Maybe. Now lets look at Daytona. OH SHIT NIGGA, NO NO NO NO this can't be happening. A 5K Seiko looks pretty sweet next to a 20K swiss shitter.
I guess the Seiko movement isn't so bad after all.

>t Gay Sexko movements are universally shitty,

How much is a spring drive Rolex? Or a hi-beat rolex, but keep in mind it has to be finished like that. Can rolex beat the 5000$ price?

Fun fact, the swiss stopped having the accuracy contest because Seiko won it. The swiss niggers and their fanboys are just mad about being inferior.

>>17808034
why would gs be worse than a cheap soiko

>>17808047
Oh right.

>>17808037
lol japs quartz raped you into a crisis

>>17808042
Idk seems fine to me anon, you seem pretty sour though

>>17808054
>that gif
>seems fine

You're either samefagging or clinically retarded if you can't spot the thickness in lettering on the dial. The Omega and Seamaster text is night and day. Holy fuck.

>>17808055
Looks fine to me anon

>>17808058
Why are you posting random pictures of somebody elses watches now? Fuck this, I've had enough of fake buyer samefag.

>>17808054
Time and date are wrong, confirmed fake

>>17808061
I’m obviously not the same guy, retard. I’m laughing at you replying to yourself though. Keep seething, dumb asshole. Maybe one day you can afford something nicer than Casio.

>>17807909
Nice dive watch! Do you dive often? Do you often dive to 300 meters?

No?!? You mean, you bought a dive watch and you don't dive? FUCKING POSER

You should have bought a "regular" (dress, field, et cetera) for everyday wearing like to the grocery store, work, cooking dinner; which is what you're going to do, anyway, since you don't actually go diving.

>>17807969
Hideous.

Fuck I wasn’t expecting seamaster drama when I came in the thread. But I was wondering if I’m retarded for wanting the seamaster Oreo as my first luxury watch even though I’m a wristlet. Anyone know what the lug to lug is like or if they wear small?

>>17808069
Holy shit the Seamaster sent you into a bind rage lmao how many times are you gonna keep replying

>>17807909
Nice typo PierogiPal

>>17808069
Diving is actually part of my job yes

>>17808069
So I can use the bezel to time how long my cup of tea has been brewing

>>17807888

>>17808069
a dress watch recommendation? from a shithead like you??? oh the irony!!! show us how you look!

>>17808080
Caught me!

>>17807888

>>17808085
I wish they went with this caseback over the exhibition. I love this caseback so much but I absolutely hate the 75th anniversary dial.

>>17808061
Is mine fake too you stupid poorfag shiteater?

>>17807888

>>17808089
What watch is that?

>>17808087
Sure. Pic related is me.

>>17807888
.

>>17808100
I was going to make fun of you, but you got balls my dude, I'll let other people judge you instead.

>>17808100
Go back to india, pootard

>>17808089
Can't unsee
Why would they put a star in there?

>>17808096
yes

>>17808099
Sugess doxa 600t clone
>>17808106
Cos it's fun :) there's one on the crown too

So sick of all these fake Seamasters with comic sans font. I swear to God you niggers are blind. Post real watches, pic rel here’s my SOTC

>>17806746
Wearing smaller watches was a very chic style in the 1960's and it still holds up today. Wearing oversized watches and nothing but submariners is lame. 38 mm is a perfect size.

>>17808128
I'm not sure if this Seamaster is 38mm but this is.

>>17806734
hello my friends, mountaineering season has come to a close and so the AT returns, today for some light scrambling to support recovery. while i'm back here, recommend me a light ana-digi with 10bar wr and battery eol indicator

>>17808048
thoroughly BTFO the grand seiko hater. He didnt even reply LMAO

>>17807021
Silver and gold "classic styled" metal ones are fine but anything else like bulky gshocks or black watches just screams sperg

>>17808118
amateur

>>17808097

>>17808048
Grand Seiko is the pinnacle of watchmaking since it integrates automatic and quartz electronic components for timekeeping. I personally love the aesthetics of Grand Seikos too.

>>17808144
Bulova precisionist movement mogs spring drive

>>17808142

Thoughts on the tissot prx 80 with an orange rubber strap??

>>17808151
I ordered the rubber after buying with a bracelet and I honestly hate how they look. The bracelet is the best part of the watch

>>17808155
I also prefer the orginal bracelet, but sometimes the original bracelet feels a bit "overdressed" to say and doesn't fit in certain situations like going out to more relaxed places like the gym, soccer game, shopping, to the club, to a concert etc. The original bracelt rather fits more formal occasions like the office, high-end restaurants, bars, flying in business class etc.

>>17808128
>Wearing smaller watches was a very chic style in the 1960's
Why would I want to wear what boomer chicks were wearing?

>>17807367
>>17807363
>>17807359
Moon landing was signalling

>>17808069
But I dive into your mom's pussy every day

can anyone identify this watch,my uncle gave it to me

>>17808161
Oh yeah I fly business class all the time. Sometimes I drive my bugatti to my private jet lol

Yeah I get it. I was eyeing up those fancy adapters which let you put any strap on it but they're ridiculously expensive. Ended up just buying more watches instead

>>17808151
will never not look like a toilet bowl to me

>>17808151
Reddit hype watch with a plastic movement. Moonswatch tier

>>17807300
Blancpains are awesome. This is some wild design. I do like it but I'd say the bright colours cheapen it a bit, but Swatch/Blancpain is a combination I'd never thought I'd see. Beautiful case back though. These are definitely more affordable than their other models, of course.

>>17808118
>>17808139
>those "collections"
LMAO, this can't be real

>>17807775
Thats the point of the collection to look "premium" without spending that much. Its really pathetic to feel "important" wearing an expensive watch when the general pop only knows about Rolex, Gshock and Apple Watches.

>>17808178
Shut up, that’s what a real man’s watch collection looks like. Your just mad because you’re seamaster is clearly fake. The fonts are way to bold!

>>17808182
So you only buy watches to impress other people? Sad, pathetic and gay. I buy ROLEX because it’s a quality timepiece that I can pass down to my children.

>>17808144
>Grand Seiko is the pinnacle of watchmaking
I wouldn't call them that. They're nice though, very nice even.

>>17808188
>Implying you would have a kid
Not everyone can afford a Rolex but there are still some watches that maybe cheaper but still offer quality. Even if you own a Rolex and you're a shitty owner then that shit wouldn't last long. Its all just within the watch community which is more sad and gay.

>>17808118
bottom left is the only one you need
why did you get 5 more?

>>17808139
>>17808118
Poverty collection.

>>17808149
>Bulova precisionist movement mogs spring drive

Bulova are interesting, but their watches are all hideous. Look at it, it's so fucking ugly.

Citizen who own Bulova should use that movement for something else.

>>17807149
Seiko alpinist, Seiko Sarb, or as others have said, Hamilton. I'd go with a Jazzmaster or Hamilton Murph personally. Good midrange watches that still look nice. At 500-1000 dollars you want something that still has a decent movement, sapphire glass, and has a good reputation as a company.

>>17807160
This is a new company Echo/Neutra, but a watch in the same price range I was considering. Some other new companies that seem to be making decent stuff somewhat in your price range are Farer and Christopher Ward.

>>17808196
I have 2 kids, and if you can’t afford a ROLEX you really should just consider killing yourself. It’s more respectable to just be dead than wear cope watches.

>>17808163
???

>>17808162
More like what businessmen and respectable people wore. You see it in old James Bond films or even the series Mad Men.

>>17808239
>she
>French
Even your own definition is telling, FAGGOT

>>17808240
That's not the definition of the word. That's an example of using the word in a sentence.

>>17808048
You would be right, but you posted a picture of a fake daytona movement so now it just looks like cope

>>17808244
Lmao okay enjoy dressing like a French women you fuckin homo

>>17808247

octo cope

>>17808245
>but you posted a picture of a fake daytona movement so now it just looks like cope

Whoops, my bad.
Here's the real Daytona. Hardly any better.

>>17808100
GBTYOC.

>>17808178
I'd say it's a good troll, but there really are Invicta watch collectors out there. They think the gaudy style actually looks just like the expensive watches they try to imitate.

>>17808149
This Grand Seiko >>17808144 is not a spring drive.

>>17807657
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHH
SILVER ON SILVER ON THAT ANGLE I'M GOING INSANE HELP ME HIGHCONTRAST-NIGGERMAN

>>17808149
That watch looks horrible though.
>>17808218
>their watches are all hideous.
I agree, with the exception of this one. This is the only Bulova design I'd ever buy and only because it's a budget Omega Speedmaster.

>>17807888

>>17808218
These are gorgeous and I ordered it this morning

>>17808252
Isn't this trend dead already? It feels like they're flogging a dead horse by now.

>>17808271
I thought of getting this but I don't like how it has similar stupid subdial proportions as the Reduced. The subdials are just too small and far apart imo. The Moonwatch really has the perfect subdial proportions imo.

>>17808268
It's have no troubles with legibility, you're making up problems that aren't there. The pic is to showcase the thinness.
Also FACETS!

>>17808280
Isn't this a shitty tacked on module chrono movement?

Btw, here's how Seiko is finishing the spring drive movement. Quite respectable for a quartz which doens't have many gears to show. I'm not going to compare this to an Oysterquartz, you know what it looks like.

>>17808271
I almost like it except for one thing. The smooth case looks incredibly cheap. Having no edges and no different surfaces it's just a one smooth metal pebble it screams they were saving the money on machining and just made it a simple diecast piece.

Look at the sneedmaster's elaborate fluted lugs with high polish on the outside and brush finish inside and then at that.

>>17807543
>>17807608
Yeah, they're gas tritium. Ball is an underrated brand because it utilizes that technology. Even Superlumoniva lume is pretty ineffective compared with tritium gas tubes. The Fireman series is my fav too so I'm glad this anon posted it. All most I talk to about watches ever talk about otherwise is Omega Speedmaster this, Tudor/Rolex submariner that...
>>17807543

>>17808285
facets won't avail you in the perpetual half light that is your life
BEGONE DEMON OF ILLEGIBILITY
Shoo!

>>17808271
>>17808276

Imagine if Citizen used the precisionist movement for their THE CITIZEN and removed the stupid fat chicken logo.

That would be an absolute dunk on GS and everybody else too.

>>17808280
To be sure. Speedmasters are classic and have very good functionality while still retaining great iconic design.

>>17808295
but i love chicken

>>17808295
I do like the case on this very much.

>>17808196
You probably have two retarded kids, not everyone likes Rolex. Even if I have money to buy one right now, it would still be the least priority of a watch for me. Get your shit straight, if it gives you hell to see people wearing lower brands then this gives me comfort in knowing that I live rent free in your head.

>>17808255
No one knows what that means

All is nice and queasy until you flip the Gay Sexko's balance bridge over, or you look behind the dial.
LOL
LMAO, even

>>17808293
Ball is owned by a Hong Kong company. Pass

>>17808276
That's actually not bad. As for most of the other ones though.. I don't know why consumerists favor these tag heuer racing styles that they're imitating though.

>>17808276
No taste

>>17808315
wtf what happened to japanese perfectionism

>>17808318
Better than a CCP company. It used to be an American company started in Cleveland, OH. I don't resent Hamiltons just because they're owned by Swatch now. They've still kept the quality and good designs.

>>17808315
>i-i-it's bad if I do all these nonsensical conditions!

cope. meanwhile you'll accept a plastic movement if it had swiss stamped on it lmao

>>17808324
I disagree, it looks ace and I can't wait for it to arrive

>>17807978
Scratch magnet. Also Hamilton is historically an American brand, so seeing “Pan-Europa” on a dial is super cringe, even if they’re owned by Swatch. Lastly, the accents should be made of real gold, anything fake gold or gold-toned is trailer trash

New >>17808338

>>17807978
It's an interesting design, but I kind of do think it looks a bit fashion-watch-ish, like a fossil. It probably would appear that way from a distance. I like the bezel and case, but the face should be different.

>>17808315
yikes you don't even have take it apart appearantly

>>17808339
Nope. Scratch that. Reverse it.

>>17806802
i see you citizenanon

>>17807406
Do you remove it when you go to sleep? Depending on its position it loses or gains time.

>>17807479
>san martin BBChrono clone
so a cope of a cope? anon...

>>17808100
is that an islander?

>>17807725
I don't dive and nor do you. Stop wasting your money.

Why are you guys buying those inaccurate, overpriced and useless pieces of crap instead of just getting an Applewatch?

>>17808151
Jesus Christ NO

>>17806805
Muh german engineering/design. Jesus,get a Braun watch and it will be better.

>>17806973
Like literally every single watch from every single brand from 1930-1950 looked like a Cartier Tank.
> you’re exaggerating
Yeah but only a little bit.