/fa/ - Fashion

>>17802838
>0.5 selfies
because they have friend to take selfie with

Y2k influence, and this shit is not new. Flyover states should be banned from posting here lest they act shocked about 5 year old trends.

>>17802903
is central us really that bad? i thought that the western world is so globalized that these trends appear everywhere (maybe with a yearly delay or something). i live in eastern eu and whatever happens in paris/berlin etc comes to us after a few months.

>>17803162
>is central us really that bad?
all of us is bad. unless some popular tik tok or youtube fag points out stuff
these clowns are always behind

>>17802838
What is a “0.5 selfie”

>>17802838
>asian girls
EEEEWW!

>>17803314
Every woman in your chart is ugly to me.

>>17803279
seconding this question

>>17802903
are you that catty NYC schizo bitching about flyovers? You're a legitimately bad person lol.

I really hate /fa/ and /soc/ the very idea goes against the ethos of 4chan and it attracts faggots (like you) who belong in a soviet gulag and I'm someone who thinks that McCarthy didn't go far enough

>inb4 flyover. I'm metro west coast.

>>17803577
Bump

>>17802838
you mean the fat girl angle shot?

>>17803569
Every woman you see is ugly to you, because you're a homosexual

>>17802838
Remember when people did fishbowl lens photos. That was fun.

>>17803162
I just saw another thread saying "y2k is back bitches". Flyover states are a cancer on this board. All their trends are 5 years behind the rest of the world.

>>17803577
Selfie using fisheye on a phone, ie 0.5 zoom level

>>17803279
>>17803577
>>17803686
.5 is half of 1. It's a 'Half'-selfie. A 'SELF'ie shared equally by two people. I've never heard the term before and was able to contextualize it instantly, why are you 'people' are lagging behind?

>>17803725
Trump lost

>>17803757
ironically the trend of saying flyover states are behind is itself an old dead trend said by people in denial about being in neo-flyovers (like new york and LA that are now objectively years behind on American trends). No I won't tell you who is ahead/current on trends these days.

>>17803787
based retard