/fa/ - Fashion

First for FUCK THIS MASSIVE FAGGOT

First for watch related domestic violence.

What's the best Rolex ever and why is it the Explorer II?

>>17777029
What happened?
Did she tried to buy a homage/replica/fake and was rightfully punished for it?

>>17777032
That’s not even the best explorer.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3Y-HgRoano

>>17777029
i suggest wearing the g-shock gmw-b5000d when smacking a bitch. looks good when fucking too

>>17777040
>no iconic orange arrow hand

>>17777041
KYS, you massive faggot.

What are some watches with prominent cross iconography?

I want to subtly indicate my allegiance to Christianity. Any price point will do.

Stop buying shitters.

>>17777053
Most, if not all premium watch brands are owned by jewish families, so being a watch tard and a pol tard at the same time doesn't make sense

>>17777079
F.P. Journe is owned by a french turbo autist with a weird head.

>>17777025
>''Hey, nice dia-...''
>''OH NO! It's a LongJeans, I'm not suppose to like longjeans!''

>>17777053
Monta, but contrarians on this board will give you shit for wearing one because ''hurr durr muh generic movement hurr durr me must have in house!''

>>17777041
fuck off poofter

Not only does the New Zealand Casio store have a vastly better selection of watches available then the Australia Casio store, but equivalent watches are somehow cheaper in NZ Zimbabwe bux then the exact same watches in Australia in AUD

>>17776726
Tracking is saying it's shopped to the distribution centre so I guess we'll see

>>17777109
>Nice Polar... Oh, nevermind.

>>17777109
nice buttplug hand

>>17777185
when watches tell more than the time

>>17777040
>36mm
That's for women, dog.

>>17777218
post your wrist

>>17777218
>36mm
>40mm
everyone happy

>>17777178
The watch looks pretty nice, but I don't like the meteorite dial.
The meteorite dial is one of the ugliest trends in horology today, someone had to say it.

>>17777111
Spectacular numerals. We dont give a shit about off-the-shelf movements, as long as the companies dont go overboard and change the rotor (at best) and give it an in-house designation, thats just top cringe and meme marketing for the laics.

It's a horse watch day today, what are you wearing today? This one has a nice sunburst dial on it and has a few variants with case and how the 3 horses are done.

>>17777246
>what are you wearing today?
Rolex Explorer 1

>>17777246
It's shitter-o-clock today, Anons.

>>17777176
Longines been doing this way before JLC.

First legend diver issued in 1961. The Memovox Polaris came out in 68-69.

>>17777218
1) it’s a classically sized sports watch that would not have looked undersized 50 years ago
2) even if it was “for girls” I don’t give a fuck I like smaller watches they are more comfortable and I like the way they look

Should I get this Zodiac killer watch? Seems a bit overpriced for what it is but I love green sunburst.

>>17777268
>>17777176
I really love the Polaris too but you gotta give credit where credit is due. Bought are nice watches tho.

That being said, the reissue of the Legend Diver is better than the new Polaris when it comes to recreate the vintage look and being loyal to it's origin.

The new Legend Diver feels like a vintage watch, the JLC one feels more like a Rolex Explorer cope . Thats my opinion tho, I'm just a regular guy who loves watches so take it or leave it.

post the watch you are wearing today

>>17777218
how fat are you?

>>17777276
Picture is old of a couple of days but this the one I'm currently wearing

>>17777028
Why do you keep posting him?

>>17777279
What model is that? Looks good

>>17777246
>>17777276
>watch you are wearing today?
Something green

>have OK watch
>ruin it with green-yellow lume and ugly random logo when real brands have only text
why do chinks do this

>>17777032
Hnngg.

Every watch is a cope for an all-gold Rolex.

>>17777180
penis

>>17777032
For me, it's the Sky-Dweller

>>17777313
GABAGOOL!

>>17777304
Nice watch, what movement does it use?

>>17777313
>Every watch is a cope for an all-gold Rolex.
ok, gippo.

>>17777284
nta but i think it's the SBGA349

>>17777304
That's a really nice green watch, very cool

>>17777304
I asked "today" not just post an old pic from your phone, dumbass.

>>17777032
>What's the best Rolex ever and why is it the Explorer II?
You misspelled Daytona.

>>17777347
Moonwatch cope

>>17777372
lol, you probably think the Explorer was used to climb Everest too.

rolex check

>>17777284
>>17777330
this

>>17777393
Currently +4 seconds fast cumulative, averaging .60 seconds fast per day.

>>17777276

>>17777041
keep me updated i like watching

>>17777443
>green lume

>>17777443
ew

>>17777313
any seiko diver looks better and has better movement which won't shit itself after 1 year

Can I get a watch ID?
It looks like an older Santos 100 to me. Confirm?

>it tells you the month but not the day

>TISSOT LE LOCLE POWERMATIC 80 OPEN HEART
>T006.407.16.033.01
>$750.00

I love this watch (automatic, open heart, classy face), but I need a date display as I often write and forget dates for work. Any suggestions on such a model?

>>17777276
I had my beater on

>>17777481
when you really think about it, the month is much more important

Your several thousand dollar watches have applied minute markers, right?

>>17777506
>minute markers

>>17777483
Double of the price though.

>>17777509
Yes, applied minute markers, all 48 of them.

Does anyone know the Casio Feldestein is wearing here?

>>17777025
Thoughts on this Casio. I really want a 230 but I'm afraid of getting a fake but this one is on thier website and looks nice

>>17777519
I think it's a Freestyle Shark not a Casio.

>>17777520
It's cool but it might feel cheap.

>>17777537
yeah the strap seems to look like it, thanks.

>>17777539
All Casios feel cheap, it's part of the charm

>>17777025
Ok i just got out of the pissot store and these prxs are so much smoller than i thought i was unironically thinking glaciar blue for a random summer watch this smol chinese sales lady was like
>oh thats the fotty
>oh thats the forty thats so smol oh thank you have a good day

>>17777556
what the fuck are you trying to say? did you have an aneurysm while typing this post?

>>17777176
>>17777268
>>17777274

If I get the chance tho, I'd rather buy the JLC Polaris than a Rawlkeks Explorer. I don't give a shit about mountain climbing, it's a nice watch for sure but when it comes to the finishing, JLC is on another level.

This and the Cartier Santos are my next 2 watches.

>>17777470
Based ass enjoyer

>>17777556
racism is not ok on blue boards.

>$30M vacheron constantin pocket/dashboard watch
>Comes with free Rolls Royce Drophead
I want one

>>17777556
>I’m fat

>br*celets

>>17777565
Shut the fuck up you stupid nigger
>>17777568
No im /fit/ idiot

>>17777341
Thanks, m8. I loooove the shade of green on the dial. It's so cool.

>>17777324
It's their new in-house day-date colum wheel chronograph movement called caliber 69385, and developped for the Pilot 41mm family. It beats at 28'800 VPH (4 Hz), has 230 parts (I think) and imho has quite a nice finishing, especially for the price range.

The best way to distinguish it from the previous Valjoux 7750 is the seconds subdial, which in the old 7750 is at 9 while in the new caliber is at 6. Hence, the red subdial's hand.

My trusty shitter was stolen last week, pic related.

What cheap quartz chronos with size around 38-40mm would you recommend? White dial preferred, but other colors are fine too.

what are some futuristic watches?

>>17777492
Is it pvd? It's rather nice to see more uncommon brand like UN in here. Cool, m8.

>>17777617
Search MB&F

>>17777565
SLAM DUNK A NIGGER BABY INTO THE TRASH CAN

>>17777615
How did you manage to get your watch stolen?

>>17777608
That looks... very nice.
I'm beginning to appreciate the value of movement finishing. Makes my pipi hard.

>>17777653
Was walking home from a bar in the night and bumped into some mudheads with knives.

>>17777663
Lmao I couldn’t imagine living around ethnics. Good luck with that

>>17777543
No they don't, only the flimsy metal ones do because they look like they would be heavier. That's not charming, the plastic models don't feel cheap because you expect them to be light. Even a DW-5600 has a nice heft to it.

>>17777272
>Seriously replying to bait
I expect nothing less from an explorer fag

>>17777040
why did you post the worst entry of the oyster perpetual line

>>17777483
https://www.jomashop.com/tissot-watch-t035-407-16-051-03.html there's one in white too I believe. really cheap powermatic for that price

>Mechanicalfags claim that watches are jewels not tools
>They discard expensive quartz dress watches
How come

>>17777696
A mechanical watch is a piece of art. An analog hand watch with a battery is a mimicry of that art. You want functionality? Just buy a smart watch or some shit, don’t try to hang with us poser ass bitch

>>17777138
Look like something out of the homoerotic 'bodybuilding' magazines of the era

>>17777304

>>17777519
id on shorts?

>>17777703
Innovative technology married with expert craftsmanship results in the best timepiece. Reminder if Breguet were alive he would wear a 9F Grand Seiko.

Give me some explore alternatives

>>17777716
>if Breguet were alive he would wear a 9F Grand Seiko.
Nobody with self respect would wear a japanese shitter if a swiss high-end is available.

Just need my A1100 to be complete

I wonder who will get septuplets >>17777777

>>17777730
Not me

>>17777703
>>17777719
A piece of art is beautiful. Some mechanicals are fugly. That's like saying anything painted with a digital brush or composed with software isn't art or like those that said photography isn't art 150y ago

>>17777663
where's your CCL?

watches are gay

>>17777732
Me neither :(

Why don't they just make another one?

>>17777733
Some mechanical are fucking ugly, no doubt, but no japanese quartz is a piece of art, they cut too many corners in movement finishing, precisely because they're quartz.
The only true artistic quartz I can think of is the FPJourne Elegante.

>>17777746
They lost the technology.

Check em

>>17777751
KWAB

>>17777748
They cover the movement anyway, the finishing goes into the dial hands and case. Its not like the 9f is disgusting, its finished to good standard obviously the price is too low to expect fp journe level.

>>17777755
>its finished to good standard
So, just not masterfully artistic, right?
Then, by your own premise, it ain't art.

>>17777718
Old longines conquest

Buy rolex

>>17777079
the sterns aren't jews

>>17777703
>You want functionality?
This guy is right. Quartz still retain the functionality of a watch due to their accuracy. Mechanical watches have nothing other than their artistry, they are too far removed from a watch.

>>17777771
it's 2023, watches are fashion accessories

>>17777746
why doesn't seiko
>re-release anything decent from their massive library of decent looking neat shit that's totally in vogue right now?
because they're retarded
and even if they did release it they'd fuck it up by changing the proportions, adding extraneous bullshit to the dial that nobody wants, put a shit movement inside whether it be quartz or mechanical and charge a ridiculous price for something with shit QC
seiko is done, they just don't know it yet because like with everything else they've even behind for their own demise

>>17777773
If you're a fag. Normal people still need accurate quartz watches.

>>17777760
Technologically it is high tier, if GS had the budget to get voutillinen to black polish indivual screws and bevel the edges and have a master engraver replace the geneva striping with traditional grotesque floral designs then it would be unbeatable, but they do what they can within the budget and means of mass production.

>>17777782
normal people have phones for that
or they use digital watches

>>17777783
But they do have it. They just cut corners in movement finishing and focus entirely on the dial cause they don't understand luxury, delivering a disappointing product that only looks good if you don't flip it over, ever.
I have thought about buying a GS in the past, but every time I inspect their movement, it's like looking at a extremely expensive Oris or Longines.
They should at least, AT LEAST, deliver similar quality to entry level JLC, IWC or even Rolex. But they don't.

>>17777783
But they do have it. They just cut corners in movement finishing and focus entirely on the dial cause they don't understand luxury, delivering a disappointing product that only looks good if you don't flip it over, ever.
I have thought about buying a GS in the past, but every time I inspect their movement, it's like looking at a extremely expensive Oris or Longines.
They should at least, AT LEAST, deliver similar quality to entry level JLC, IWC or even Rolex. But they don't.

>>17777821
Seiko typically leaves their autistic finishing for Credor not Grand Seiko. Though I imagine their 50k+ watches come with incredible movement finishing.

>>17777837
So you're admiting any GS below 50k is total dogshit. Good. Now we understand each other.

>>17777837
The ones from the Micro Artist Studio do, the rest are 'normal'.

>>17777844
Not really, the technological effort outweighs the autism on finishing. Plus the finishing from the dial side is always 10/10 flawless literally beating watches 3-10x the price.

Is the quartz PRX better than the automatic with the plastic escapement?

>>17777852
>the technological effort outweighs the autism on finishing
That's such a chinese thing to say...
>Plus the finishing from the dial side is always 10/1
Still... shit movement finishing.

>>17777782
Buy an smart watch then. Don’t buy a fake luxury watch bitchnigga

>>17777863
I only need accurate time why would I buy shit I don't need retard?

>>17777864
ok here you go. or do you need something more rugged?

>>17777868
>mechanifag recommending casios to a casiofag
Go be a retard somewhere else faggot.

>>17777872
what’s the problem then? you forgot to present an argument. you don’t think i’m a casiofag too?

>>17777862
racist cope lol

meanwhile you soiface over low effort movement like this when it has rolex or swiss on it

What do you think?

>>17777878
what is this model?

>17777868
What is this monstrosity?

>>17777875
>I only need quartz.
>get smartwatch!
>don't need all the extra shit
>here's a quartz!
It's friendly fire so I'll let it go but you're being a real retard.

>>17777042
i gotta get an expensive gshock one day

>>17777878
negative displays always suck in real life

>>17777746
wait a year or two and they will

Opinions on modded watches

>>17777879
Either a shoop or a gshock style case over an iShitter watch.

Haven't worn a watch for many, many years so wanted to get me something very minimalist to get me started. Bought a Mondaine Helvetica Regular today. Wanted the Light actually, but could not for the life of my find it with mesh strap, only brown leather.

>>17777276
Love the factory bracelet on this but I can’t get it to fit me. I didn’t wear this for a while but putting it on this ostrich strap from WatchGecko made it feel like a new watch

>>17777879
I bamboozle you like a child

It's an apple watch mod

>>17777876
Rolex movements are badly finished and yet still better than Gay Sexko.
Terrible, really.

>>17777927
See.OP's pic. They're cool.

>36mm

Ah, it's those hours again. See you in the morning anons!

>he's still coping

>>17777973
>50k
So, not like the GS you see around, right?

>>17777891
don’t buy a quartz with analog hands stupid nigger

>>17777973
That's an odd bland finishing, just plain.
Why there isn't "côtes de genève" or "waves of Tokyo" or whatever is called?
Seems too low effort.

>>17777981
I will do whatever I want because I'm not a retard faggot like you.

>>17777716

>>17777996
>i’ll suck dick if i want to d-dad!!!1

>>>17777777

This is my grandfather's watch. Is there any way to ID and/or price it? I know it's Longines, but I was hoping for a deeper provenance.

>>17777218
>t. fatso

>>17778059
Why do you want to price it?

>>17778059
Try posting it unironically in Longines or watch reddits, as for here is there anything on the back like a serial number?

>>17778059
By the way whatever you do DO NOT SELL IT.

You are going regret trading in this piece in a few years when you realize what a beautiful watch it had and what significance it had to you, no 200 or 2000 dollar price tag will ever make that right trust me.

>>17777276

>>17778059
>>17778067
>>17778068
>>17778070

damn... I forgot to post pic of back. This is cropped because it's engraved with our family name, but pic has the only marking.

I will never sell it, but I would like to price it just for the sake of curiosity.

>>17778078
I can not find the watch but I guess around 500, a bit less would be a ballpark. your best bet is to go on reddit and ask them what watch it is.

>>17777621
Thanks
I’ve read it’s dlc tho, so it should be more resistant than normal pvd

>>17778059
Longines is actually very very good about keeping old records and maintaining old watches. They'll be able to help you uncover its provenance and, if you don't have the original boxes and papers, issue you updated ones.

>>17778089
DLC (diamond-like coating) is a form of PVD (physical vapor deposition). It's just made of a tougher material. Black PVD is usually just titanium nitrate, DLC adds some carbon to the mix.

>>17778097
What about ion plating?

>>17778099
Ion plating is also another form of PVD. It's often done in a plasma environment, in the case of optical coatings. It's good at getting a very thin coating on very dense materials.

For the purposes of precision tooling, the differences matter, but for watch case coatings, it's all just marketing.

>>17777975
>>17777987
Nah not worth debating you swiss wankers

Grand Seiko could cure cancer and you'd still be muh swisshitter rawlecks

I like fumé dial. Post fumé dial.

>>17778115

When did watch modding just become "turning Seikos into fake Rolexes and APs?"

>>17778109
Ah i see. Well it's holding on pretty well in my case i must say.

>>17778143
When NH35 got introduced.

>>17777276
>cum

Thoughts?

I'm looking to get a "premium" all metal digital watch. I like the sleek design but the price seems a bit much. Since it's a microbrand it will rarely show up on the 2nd market so I don't think I will be able to get it cheaper.. Sadly Casio G-Shock all-metal prices are insane.

>>17777718
Nivada Grenchen Super Antarctic 3.6.9

>>17778173
Looks like something pic related would wear. ie. it's cool.

>WR
>WATER RESIST
Why is it redundant? Ruins a perfect watch.

>>17778187
more like pussy resist am I right?

is there a comparable watch to the timex weekender chronograph that has a steel case instead of brass? idk what the fuck they're thinking having a plated brass case, it can't affect the prodcution cost that much surely.

>>17778113
WE accept your surrender.

>>17778143
>When
Right there

what’s a good watch for someone with a bipolar disorder girlfriend who he dearly loves but is close to breaking up with her because she refuses to get medicated and is losing her grip on reality?

>>17778228
Blue Presage

>>17778228
Rolex Datejust

>>17778187
>>17778188
Pussy repelent, even

>>17778228
>but is close to breaking up with her because she refuses to get medicated
Explorer 36.
Same as mine...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPfYLw6aA_8

>make a cool watch
>make it limited edition and unreasonably expensive

fuck casio

I finally understand the appeal of omega

>>17778247

>>17778253
>Sea of words.
It's dogshit, just like lolex dials.

>>17778253
>FINE RESIN CUSHIONING!!!

domed or flat, bros?

>>17778264
that's the point man

>>17778188
>>17778234
>LE SEXOOO, PUSSY AND CHICKS BRO, CHICKS AND PUSSY, 24/7 GRIND BRO

>>17777040
mogged

>>17778173
What are you talking about? A metal G-Shock will cost you as much as the watch you posted.

>>17777316
This might be the worst rolex ever made

>>17778187
It looks neat. Watch texts are filled with redundancy like list the depth in meters and feet.

>>17778282

Will today's Seiko mechanisms be sold in the future, say 15-20y from now? I'm trying to ballpark how long I can keep a new watch running

>>17778253
It is pricy but nothing else compares. I didn't even like it at first but it makes a great everyday watch.

>>17777973
>tarting up a fancy quartz movemnt
I like GS and all, but spring drive is dumb.

>>17778299
Seems pretty smart actually.

Can someone explain why are schizos larping as malding arabs over 36mm watches?

>gshocks are fugly
>most of you have horrible taste
>there is nothing wrong with analog quartz
There

>>17777981
Holy shit the mimicry retard again. Please fuck off back wherever you came from

>>17778305
Some assblasted and tasteless fatfuck is my best guess. Or maybe that guy who bought a dinnerplate IWC and was mad at the whole thread telling him it was too big for him

>>17777032
Some Explorers are better than others, the new models are way to big.

>>17777981
That has to be the most NPC contrarian take ever. As if digital mechanical clocks weren't a thing, even in the 17th century. Telling everyone you have a hard time reading analog clock hands is such a weird hill to prove your retardation on

>buy $300 seiko 5
>movement is off by >30s/day out of the box
>buy $900 prospex
>movement is off by >45s/day out of the box
>buy $200 tissot with their shittiest powermatic
>within cosc standards out of the box

why is seiko like this?

>>17778321
what powermatic did you get for $200?

>>17777973
>Endlessly mogs Gay Sexko

>>17778324
i got a mother of pearl pr100 for $220, it's pretty neat.

>>17778305
Just someone angry they bought into the bigwatch fad right at the end of the wave when things are starting to return to pre-chink/russian tastes pandering the mountainjew's been high off of

>>17778247
cool I was just looking at this as the only cheap watch with blue lume too bad the white indices are wasted on a white dial

>>17778297
i’m mad jelly bro. congrats, cool watch

>>17778309
kys niggerfaggot

P E R F E C T I O N

>>17778331
>>17778312
Delusions of the wristlet homunculae.
LMAOOOOOOOOO

>>17778348
You sound like someone who thinks laughing emoji is a comeback

>>17778288
I think I figured it out. "WR" is the specific rating of water resistance. "WR" meaning 30m. Other watches will have "50M" printed to serve the same purpose but with a different rating like picrel.

Really sad. Trump needs help and you libtards spend money on watches anyway. WHY

>>17778347
those shiny hands are garbage in sunlight

>>17778359
wr casios can do 5 or 6 bar fine

>>17778362
you mean he needs a pardon to escape jail time?

>>17778321
powermatic is really good, even the cheap versions. weird that this thread shits on it then shills movements a hundred times less accurate

>>17777718
All-gold GMT Master

So I just sent my watch to the watchmaker, chuffed to have it back and finally working again in a few weeks.

>>17778386
They are rated for less than 50m or they would be labeled 50m. Yes they can go for more but that's not relevant to the discussion.

What is the most practical and inexpensive watch not made of plastic? I wanted to buy a fw91 but they all seem to be made of resin. help me out bros

>>17778321
give models or bs cos my 3 soikos all have +-2s/d

>>17778458
duro

>>17778362
Imma cop pic related.
Is that helpful?

>>17778458
I don't think casio has cheap non resins.

>>17778458
a1000

>>17778458
Lorus field watch

>>17778468
Just checked this out on the casio site and saw a similar watch for half the price, the Illuminator, its smaller and it doesn't look as great but they're both made of stainless steel. Is there a reason you recommend the a1000 over it?
>>17778466
I've found a $60 one made of stainless steel, the Illuminator.
>>17778461
noted this but the band is made of resin so I would need to replace it and it's already twice the price of the illuminator

>>17778478
niga Illuminator is led light

>>17778478
>Illuminator
What's the model number? Those have steel bracelets and plastic cases. If you want a steel-cased digital Casio that isn't a G-Shock and doesn't have mother-of-pearl, get the A1100.

>>17778458
>What is the most practical and inexpensive watch

Embrace the plastic. It's thin and lightweight, doesn't beep in the airport frame.

>>17778478
>the Illuminator.
If you mean the a158/a168 they aren't made of steel, it's chrome coated plastic.

A1000 and this ugly boy >>17778490
Are the only actual steel case digital Casio, they also have some cheap quartz watches with hands, check out their Edifice or the nameless Casio analog watches.

>>17778515
such delicate skin I bet anon has a lovely boipucci

>>17778347
I used to think this was gaudy and gay. I still do, but now I think that's awesome.

>>17778329
I would have thought this would look like shit but actually it looks nice

>>17778282
this dial colorway otoh is astonishingly bad, I have no idea how you think this is more attractive than the explorer

>>17778228
when it was me I was wearing a Timex weekender, would not recommend

>>17778515
is it a mod or I can buy it like that? Theres a nice aesthetic to it.

>>17778553
It comes like that

>>17778553
It's the lf-20w, it's like 20$ but they tend to sell out in stores.

Is there an affordable version of the aqua terra? Preferably with the date window at the bottom

>>17778561
the aqua terra is the affordable version

>>17778478
Casio is making a duro with a steel bracelet now, about $30 more than the resin band version.

>>17778561
Edifice EFV-140D

>>17778561
Phylida do a nice one on ali

>>17778564
Just save up for a Rolex at the point

>>17778262
I don't know who the bigger faggot is: Pooftah or this obsessed Anon.

just bought a 44mm watch while having a 17.5cm wrist circumference bros

>>17778597
ok?

>>17778565
>>17778586
Guess I should just save up for a used one

>>17778347
Damn, it's the Mr. Hankey

>>17778599
yeah for sure. Patience is better than cope.

>>17778347
But why's there still plastic wrap on it?

>>17778597
Cool, what watch?

this or the weekender chronograph? I don't know if the movement is the same they don't list the movement # anywhere for either watch.

>>17778698
80 dollar watch is always quartz

>>17778702
yes? They still have different internals. I don't know if they have the same one though.

>>17778293
Please reply

>>17778515
Thanks anon, you immediately convinced me to buy it. Nice watch.

Thoughts on H-Link bracelets?

>>17778515
>doesn't beep in the airport frame.
yeah because you had to take it off beforehand.

>>17778293
you could always service it, it's just not monetarily sensible

>>17778173
apparently it's sapphire glass, with a metal case, the price isn't that stupid all things considered.

>>17778293
There's millions of them being made, you can find tonnes of previous gen 7S26s movements everywhere.Last thing to worry about.

Omega>Rolex

>>17778520
i don't get why they didn't make the a700 from stainless steel. it would have been the perfect watch.

>>17778809
A premium version with a full metal case and better quality strap would probably sell great

>>17778741
>yeah because you had to take it off beforehand.

I wear a green vest and an airfield pass so they let me go as long as I don't beep.

Got a plastic buckle belt too.

>>17778849
YABADABADOOOOOOOOOO

SOUL

>>17778857
Until it goes yellow of course, but maybe that makes it more soulful

>>17778868
matches a mans yellow pillow nicely

>>17778857
not comfortable to wear
>t. 7"

>>17778871
why would a man have a yellow pillow?

>>17778877
>he doesn't know the comfort of the yellow pillow

>>17778877
you don’t add a patina to your pillow? it softens up the material

>>17778868
>makes it more soulful
Damn right. We're reaching levels of soul that shouldn't even be possible.

>>17777246
>>17777257
>>17777276
>>17777279
>>17777304
>>17777492
>>17777560
>>17777617
>>17777933
>>17778115
>>17778316
>>17778347
I've desperately been searching for brand new automatic watches that are under 40mm lug-to-lug and it made me think I was the biggest wristlet in the world, but looking at this thread it seems that everyone just wears oversized watches.
Does anybody else think picrel is how a watch should fit? Entirely on the flat part of the wrist.

>>17778907
Flatness is about how thick the caseback is. I think anything with l2l 8-10mm less than your wrist width sits good

>>17778907
No, looks small on that pic

>>17778907
And also smaller watches make your wrist look small

skx007

I bought it bros I'm a citizen citizen now :)

>>17778916
no, big watches make your wrist look small by contrast. it's simple

>>17778935
based and solarpilled

i wear an eco drive citizen for a beater

>>17778916
>smaller watches make your wrist look small
It's literally the opposite, you fucking retard.

I want to get a daily watch, if I were to get a Tissot Gentleman, should I get the cheaper quartz or the auto?

>>17778960
Do YOU care about it? Because no one else does

>>17778916
No, being fat makes you penis look small.

>>17778935
based eco driver

>uncle knows I like watches
>he buys me this
baka

>>17778967
tell him thank you, you fucking ingrate

>>17778967
That's a nice watch, he could have done so much worse

>Timex
>Orient
>Seiko
>Citizen
>Sitting on ebay for thousands of hours

Are these my only options as an actual poorfag? I just want a watch that isn't the gay meme digital casios anymore, and timex is the only one of those making decent looking ones with their "reissue"s which I

>>17778972
explain why you hate Casio

>>17778972
as long as you like it, it doesn't matter. people here will gloat about a watch worth less than $5k isn't a real watch but making a watch your personality is sad.

>>17778877
>yellow pillow
You mean golden pillow?

>>17778960
The gentleman is so plain, get something with a bit of character

>>17778877
begone woman

>>17778907
Don't listen to those other retards, that watch looks absolutely perfect on that wrist. It's classy and not overstated and perfectly readable and functional.

>>17778967
Skyhawk is a kino watch, you say thank you to your grandpa and shut the fuck up.

>>17778907
>under 40mm lug-to-lug
That's really small. Best i can offer is a 37mm diameter 44mm lug2lug.

>>17778976
I have a casio on right now, I'm just bored of it

>>17778979
I meant more in the fact that it feels like I don't have much choice, those brands mostly make like budget diving or army watches with a few "tank" ones. I want something more fashiony, but from what I know all the explicit fashion brands making watches are shit at doing so, they just look quirky

>>17778987
No, it's a bit on the small side

>>17778994
fashion-y or dressy? I get what you mean though.

>>17778985
nice trips, but unfortunately that's why I want the Gentleman, so I have something that's plain and simple and fits anything I wear. I'm looking in the short term to get eventually a Le Locle open heart+leather bracelet for dress and maybe an orient Kamasu for something more sporty and that would be my 3 watch collection for the next decade

>>17778998
Nope.

>>17778999
>>17778994
Many of those can look fashiony if they have a polished or brushed bezel and a leather strap. For example the srpe57 line

>>17778998
It is a good fit. Lugs do not extend to the edge of the wrist and the case sits well at the center of the wrist.

Stop browsing Daniel Wellington ads.

t. different anon

if its not leather its trash

>>17778967
based uncle, time to become a man.

Guys Do the rotors in automatics make noise when you lift the wrist to check time etc?

>>17779034
none of mine make any noise

Mechanical watces are for posers
>Keeps time worse than a $5 casio
>Breaks if you play golf
>Pay a premium for a worse tool
>"Tool watch" - describes wearer, not jewelry
>Overhaul every 5 years so it can continue being merely worse than a casio and not unbelievably bad
>Most of them are unbelievably bad to begin with (+10/-5s a day is "accurate"?)
>Said to have "soul" but it's more like a ghost of the murky and barbaric past than the everpresent human spirit of progress and innovation
Behold, the white man's watch.

>>17778907
>Does anybody else think picrel is how a watch should fit? Entirely on the flat part of the wrist.
do the end links come out flat or at an angle
if at an angle then no cos autism

>>17778972
70 dolaridoos
no logo option

>>17779064

>>17778597
Congrats. Embrace masculinity, Chad.

>>17778967
i don’t like quartz watches at all but i’d be very grateful for that gift you fucking twat

>>17779034
maybe

>>17779064
if you can service your movement twice a decade I see it as a hobby

>>17779034
Some do, some dont.

>>17778972
Get a Timex Ironman and a Citizen Eco-Drive and you are set.

>>17778967
You can do way worse than a Promaster Skyhawk.

>>17779009
Christ that woman has hairy arms

>>17777025
Somebody (not me of course) make a new thread NOW

>>17779107
we on page 3 / 10

>>17779145
thread continually sinks after 350 replies

>>17779145
everybody is saving good high effort posts for the next thread

>>17779176
yes, because it hit bump limit. it will still be quite some time before we hit page 10 and the thread is in danger of archival. there is no rush.

Generals were a mistake.
Let watches threads die.

>>17779189
this. I miss when generals used to be banned

>>17777025
Hey guys, rate my watch

>>17779189
>>17779191
generals make things feel less organic, and people less likely to browse the front page, but i appreciate them because somedays i just don’t want to wade thru a bunch of crap i don’t care about

>>17779208
>more accurate than a Rolex
based

>>17779208
fuck them right in the pussy / 10

no new thread???

hello fellow richfags what are we wearing today

>>17779289
casio

>>17779289
casio

>>17779289
citizen

>>17779289
casio

>>17779009
Cyclops is so aesthetically shitty and functionally worthless

>>17779289
i'm seething rn

>>17779331
you're not a Jew so you wouldn't understand

>>17779331
I think aesthetically it’s alright. And unquestionably Rolex makes the best cyclops. I don’t like them because they are smudge magnets and it makes your watch more difficult to wipe off.

>>17779340
nothing pisses me off more than low magnification cyclops that doesn't even fill the entirety of it with the date window. to this end seiko is also very good at cyclops. microbrands just cannot

>>17779098

Is this the last ever /wt/ thread?

>>17777218
It's for white people, dog.

>>17779430
>>17779430
>>17779430
new

It's clockwer

>>17777718
Datejust or day date. Explorer is the poorfag cope version.

>>17779434
I was just in the process of making one but i got ninja'd. Oh well, maybe next time.

>>17777746
What a proportionally perfect watch.
I don't even like hooded lugs
Fuck

>>17778907
IMO the logs should stay inside the width of your wrist and not go over but after that, its from wrist to wrist. some people like smaller watches.

>>17779440
Datejust isn't even that much more than explorer and doesn't hold its value as well or go up in value on the secondary market like explorer does. There are clearly more people that want explorers.