/fa/ - Fashion

>>17745359
I think I did that, but I feel like the min hand is running fast compared to the second hand

Is it true roasties prefer blue dial watches on guys?

>>17745364
No.

Buying a Tudor GMT for my birthday.

Reminder to not wear women's watches if you are an actual male.

recommend me a watch

>>17745373

>>17745377
Audemars Piguet Royal Oak

>>17745377
Any Rolex

For me, it's the sports watch

>>17745379
Excuse me, ma'am. You dropped your 36mm watch, queen.

>>17745364

Stop buying sports watches.

>>17745388
How about YOU stop buying FASHION watches?

>>17745383
Sport watches go well with any outfit. Dress watches are for sissy cucks

>>17745391
You'll look like a tool wearing your cheap Seiko diver at your mom funerals.
(she died of the violent assfucking she kept asking me btw, sorry)

thoughts

Stop buying cheap watches.

>>17745394
i wear a rolex explorer from 2005

>>17745395
Dadcore.

I came

>>17745395

>>17745401
...to the conclusion that you're poor?

Great thread already guys.

Is it just me or is Search broken on the site right now? I can't use Search on /g/ to find the thread I'm looking for. I can't find ANY thread, that's why I'm posting here.

>>17745398
congrats anon, the 11470 is the best Explorer in terms of proportions. Now I am wearing 124270, it is a wonderful piece, the best of the current catalogue.

>>17745411
Me again. Looks like it's fixed already.

>>17745414
It's terrifying that you don't know how to use ctrl+f, honestly.

>>17745416
No, it wouldn't even go to that page. Wait, don't tell me you don't use the catalog?

>>17745407
That's because nobody post THEIR watches anymore.

>>17745423
I'll show you mine if you show me yours.

>spends 30k on a watch
>doesn't even measure heartbeat, or sleep patterns
Do they really?

Looks like there's a frog infestation in this thread
Shut it down, it's no good

>>17745437
Ayyyyyy.

wt exaggerates autism. But it is true that watch aficionados are often quite autistic. Autistic people are extremists. The most autistic attitude is that of those guys who are obsessed with a one-watch collection. On the other hand, that guy who has many variations of the same watch, these guys who have to buy a casio or seiko every month. Actually, happiness is in the middle, it is best to have a small collection made up of a few quality pieces.
Thanks for reading my blog.

>>17745377
Swatch what if... green

If it wasn’t 46mm I would probably take one
I love chinkshit

>>17745444
Nice trips. Now check out this sweet watch on my wrist bro

Timex copium is great

Use 3 words or less to describe those shitters.
>Rolex Explorer 1
>Cartier Tank Tonneau
>Grand Seiko SBGW283
>Omega Seamaster 300
>Jaeger-Lecoultre Master Control Calendar
>Zenith Chronomaster Revival
>IWC Ingenieur
>Patek Philippe Calatrava 6119
>Vacheron Constantin 222

>>17745487
>>Rolex Explorer 1
Best current Rolex
>>Cartier Tank Tonneau
Sexy but weird
>>Grand Seiko SBGW283
Who cares?
>>Omega Seamaster 300
Would not buy
>>Jaeger-Lecoultre Master Control Calendar
Make it 38mm
>>Zenith Chronomaster Revival
Ugly date window
>>IWC Ingenieur
Boring RO cope
>>Patek Philippe Calatrava 6119
Make it 36mm
>>Vacheron Constantin 222
Nice PRX bro

>>17745395
Great watch, i'm very satisfied with mine.

>>17745483
meh orange

>>17745487
>>Rolex Explorer 1
kinda boring
>>Cartier Tank Tonneau
too tall
>>Grand Seiko SBGW283
elegant
>>Omega Seamaster 300
great retro look
>>Jaeger-Lecoultre Master Control Calendar
classic
>>Zenith Chronomaster Revival
bit weird shape
>>IWC Ingenieur
lukewarm
>>Patek Philippe Calatrava 6119
classy
>>Vacheron Constantin 222
pretty much perfect

>>17745487
>Use 3 words or less
don't care. you probably don't even own a nicer watch than those

>>177455087
>don't care. you probably don't even own a nicer watch than those
So true...it's sad to see those anons who hate Rolex or Patek

>>17745508
>don't care. you probably don't even own a nicer watch than those
So true...it's sad to see those anons who hate Rolex or Patek

>>17745513
you didn't even quote me properly
I don't care

>>17745514
we can let this slide

>>17745515
Sorry anon

>>17745508

>>17745517
Why are you apologizing? I was joking. It's cool, man. We're all friends here.
>>17745519
Did you actually write that for me? I couldn't care less.

>>17745487
>Rolex Explorer 1
vanilla, missionary position
>Cartier Tank Tonneau
quite nice
>Grand Seiko SBGW283
best grand seiko / better than snowflake
>Omega Seamaster 300
generic as fuck
>Jaeger-Lecoultre Master Control Calendar
good taste
>Zenith Chronomaster Revival
it's alright
>IWC Ingenieur
expensive cope, disgraceful
>Patek Philippe Calatrava 6119
a classy classic
>Vacheron Constantin 222
nice enough

>>17745524
>>Grand Seiko SBGW283
>best grand seiko / better than snowflake
Agreed. I don't get why it's not more popular.

>>17745400
what watch isn't dadcore

>>17745539
GS as a whole produce watches that are kind of booty imo. They look nice, especially the dials and high polish hands and indices, but the proportions alway look off and the bracelets are ugly

>>17745377
Paul Newman Daytona

>>17745487
>>Rolex Explorer 1
Submariner/GMT Master/Explorer 2 cope
>>Cartier Tank Tonneau
ugly as shit
>>Grand Seiko SBGW283
ugly weeb shit
>>Omega Seamaster 300
Submariner cope
>>Jaeger-Lecoultre Master Control Calendar
Patek cope
>>Zenith Chronomaster Revival
ugly
>>IWC Ingenieur
Royal Oak/Nautilus cope
>>Patek Philippe Calatrava 6119
alright
>>Vacheron Constantin 222
dishonest watchmaking

>>17745562
I retract the last statement, I thought the 222 was that shitty drivers watch
the 222 is pretty cool actually

name one watch that is objectively not a shitter

>>17745560
They all belong on a leather strap anyway.

>>17745567
Define shitter.

>>17745567
Anything made my Michael Kors, the last true and honest watchmaker.

>>17745487
>Rolex Explorer 1
No inner monologue
>Cartier Tank Tonneau
Classy, still gay
>Grand Seiko SBGW283
Just a Seiko
>Omega Seamaster 300
Best Seamaster
>Jaeger-Lecoultre Master Control Calendar
Classic watch making
>Zenith Chronomaster Revival
Best Chronomaster
>IWC Ingenieur
Nice Royal Oh--
>Patek Philippe Calatrava 6119
Rich Man's Timex
>Vacheron Constantin 222
Best Vacheron

>>17745567
A watch that you can sell for more money than the price you paid for it or lose little money selling it

>>17745581
You people are worse than de happy merchants, so obsesed with money you cant even enjoy anything.

>>17745581
>>17745584
>I can sell it and make money back
Is the primary coping strategy for people to buy watches they can't afford.

>>17745567
Patek Phillipe Grandmaster Chime

>>17745588
Its disgusting.

"Do you like that watch anon."

"It will increase in price!" (Not value btw)

"What does that have to do with you liking it or not, you retard?"

>>17745590

>>17745487
Was there ever real meaning to the word "shitter"?

>>17745539
The color looks like a baby's bedroom. The cumrag is better

I love my watches, you can sell them for more money than you pay for them

The strap keeper on my GA-100 literally melted. It got all sweaty and sticky and the structural integrity of whatever cheap ass plastic Casio use broke down entirely. Had a similar thing happen to the band of my F-84W. Casio, I know you bitches are reading this, I fucking beseech you, step up your game. Whatever cheap ass plastic or resin you’re using sucks distended donkey balls up the ying yang. Fix it. Now.

>toilet flush guilloche pattern
>swiss guilloche main text is not centered
>oversized breguet hands
name a more triggering watch design.

>>17745612
After a lot of broken straps and lugs from Casio, now wear Timex Ironman instead of Gshock.

>>17745423
not doxing myself further

waiting for seiko 5 without the 5 and the italics

>>17745581
If you're thinking of selling a watch it's a shitter.

>>17745423
I do, almost every thread.

>>17745613
The 90s were a mistake.

>>17745615
That looks really cool, how’s the durability? I got into G-Shocks when I served in Afghanistan 2010-2012 but it might be time to make a change.

>>17745618
I can find (you)r favorite grail watch for sale pre-owned on chrono24 most likely, so it's a shitter

>>17745621
Those styles will come back. Everything goes in circles.
You think the watch world was always jerking itself off to 1970s designs like it is now?

>>17745606
other than "the shitter", of course not, it was always banter until the dumb retards came

>"H-hello Mr Journe I'm a big admirer of your work, especially the Chronomètre à R-"
>"let me see your watch son"
>"uuuh s-sure Mr Journe, here it is Mr Journe"
>*checks your wrist, immediately rolls eyes and turns back without even saying a word*

How do you respond without sounding mad?

>>17745624
Its almost two years old and like new so far. My last Gshock was actually damaged in Irak and replaced it with a Citizen there ;-)

Im not american tho.

>>17745631
But I don't care about fp journe tho so I'd never go out of my way to meet him

>>17745631
"I'm sorry missier Frederico"

>>17745631
FP Journe asking for a quick wristwatch check xD

>>17745631
How do you even impress a guy like Journe?

>>17745640
Rolex Sub.

>>17745640
Introduce him to your black wife.

>>17745631
>f-fuck you François-Paul, you just lost a potential customer

>>17745643
>Philippe Dufour entered the chat

>>17745647
Journe is a better, more skilled, more inventive watchmaker than Dufour.

>>17745650
>I hope to afford a Journe one day. I have accepted I will never own a Dufour.

slimjim Citizen from the 80s.

>>17745379
no one on this board has ever posted a 42mm or higher without being overweight, so yeah, pic related lol

>>17745640
Show him your George Daniels pocketwatch.
Failing that a Roger Smith.

>>17745632
>>17745624
What did soldiers wear?
Did officers wear nicer watches?
In the field vs in the base?
Curious

>>17745631
Sodomize him without lube.

>>17745678
It was a european base. So Casio (especially Gshock and ProTrek), Suunto and cheap as stuff from Decathlon. A few Citizen and Seikos too.

There was not a big difference between ranks.

>>17745691
Interesting. I'm guessing digital was much more represented that analog?
Were there any "nice" watches? Or just pure tool stuff?
Any Seiko/Citizen divers?
Presume that no one wore a mechanical.

>>17745694
Pure tool, and i dont recall anything mechanical. More digital than analog, but there where even many cheap analog Casios (pic rel). And yes, divers too.

Is this the watch thread?

>>17745444
it's not a problem buying one watch and wearing it for life, that's the most normal watch buyer out of all of your examples

>>17745472
How is it?

>>17745690
Based. I don’t get angry. I get horny.

>>17745491
>38mm
Fucking wristlets I swear

>>17745631
Mfw I actually met François-Paul while wearing my Journe. He is a cool guy.
>twist: he doesn't speak english btw (or at least back then) and my french is bad, so we didn't truly had a "deep" conversation, but barely superficial. :-/

>>17745361
Cool watch!

>>17745647

>>17745631
>Well… I knew my Invicta still looks better than whatever you did over the years
>I’m glad that you’re able to peddle that crap to the bored and rich

>>17745678
I’m British and served alongside French and Americans. Everyone had G-Shocks. There was no hierarchy insofar as officers having nicer watches. In fact, the majority had Baby-G’s because, despite being nominally for women, they were low profile, lightweight, comfortable and had basically the same functionality as the larger models. I only rock the larger models these days because they look cool, imo.

>>17745361
bros, i need a highly legible watch so naturally i was thinking silver on silver. is this a good choice?

>>17745749
Seethe generator

>>17745737
Cope lardass.
Back when men weren't lazy obese fat fucks and cutting their dick off, the equivalent of that JLC was 35mm.
>b-b-b-but you're a wristlet
17cm wrist, 10% body fat and a 18cm big white UNCUT dick.

>>17745749
Not for max legibility.

>>17745757
>17cm wrist, 10% body fat and a 18cm big white UNCUT dick.
Why are you describing us your boyfriend?

>>17745749
Yes

>>17745757
Post watch, hand and timestamp
Untill then you’re a tiny ass bitch.
Pic rel
Watch for you

>>17745764
Based

>>17745767
Do it first and I'll do it too, you obese nigger.
We both know you won't because you can't hide your 40% body fat.

In recent times, watch brands make smaller watches
Will we go back to the golden age?
34mm dress watches, 36mm field watches, 40mm GMT watches and 40mm Divers watches?

>>17745785
>34mm dress watches, 36mm field watches, 40mm GMT watches and 40mm Divers watches?
All of these things are available new at various price points. What the fuck are you on about?

>>17745788
Explorer ii in 40 mm when? Seamaster in 40 mm when?

>>17745791
Oh, I see. You want EXTREMELY SPECIFIC models to be redesigned exactly to your autistic specifications.

>>17745793
Nta who posted that originally but yes, I do. I'm not going to cope and get a lesser watch due to sizing

>>17745785
This is only chart you need to understand the evolution of watches sizes over the years.

>>17745785
>34mm dress watches, 36mm field watches, 40mm GMT watches and 40mm Divers watches?

ALS makes a Saxonia in 34mm
The Explorer is available in 36mm
The GMT-Master II is 40mm
The "41mm" Submariner is actually 40.5mm and Omega makes a 39.5 Planet Ocean. The BB58 is 39mm

>>17745795
>I'm not going to cope
The last thing a person says before he starts coping.

>>17745738
I saw Francois-Paul Journe at a Rolex AD in Geneve yesterday. I told him how cool it was to meet him in person, but I didn’t want to be a douche and bother him and ask him for photos or anything.
He said, “Oh, like you’re doing now?”
I was taken aback, and all I could say was “Huh?” but he kept cutting me off and going “huh? huh? huh?” and closing his hand shut in front of my face. I walked away and continued looking at the empty displays, and I heard him chuckle as I walked off. When I came to pay for my stuff up front I saw him trying to walk out the doors with like fifteen womens Datejust in his hands without paying.
The girl at the counter was very nice about it and professional, and was like “Sir, you need to pay for those first.” At first he kept pretending to be tired and not hear her, but eventually turned back around and brought them to the counter.
When she took one of the watches and started scanning it multiple times, he stopped her and told her to scan them each individually “to prevent any electrical infetterence,” and then turned around and winked at me. I don’t even think that’s a word. After she scanned each watch and put them in a bag and started to write his name on the waiting list for a GMT Master 2, he kept interrupting her by yawning really loudly.

>>17745444
>Trips checked.
>Grounded opinion respected.
t. a guy who owns three watches.

>>17745774
>Y-you first
Pussy

>>17745383
>>17745388
>>17745389
>>17745391
I get that this is the most faggy thread on the most faggy board, but why can't you fags just have more than one watch, a sport watch for casual wear and sports, and a dress watch for formal occasions?

>>17745444
I'm probably going to build up a thirty watch collection in the next few years, but every watch I plan to get will be one I absolutely love. I want to have a watch for every occasion and vibe, which is how I am with clothes as well.

Anything that looks like the Orient sun and moon but doesn't have such a shitty movement? Like the look but not the specs

>>17745841
Most people buy multiple sports watches and own 0 dress watches, which is beyond retarded if you ask me.
This anon >>17745388 is right unironically.

>>17745860
I agree that having a dress watch is important, but I don't see the problem with having multiple sport watches.
>G-Shock for going to the range
>Diver for diving and swimming
>Chronograph to time stuff
>Generic casual watch for when the dress watch is too formal

>tfw wristlet

I'm actually fine with ~39mm dress watches with some caveats. I think it depends more on the case design and how proportionate the diameter is to the thickness of the watch.
>Patek
5227: 39mm x 9.24mm. Should be 35-37mm given how thin the watch is and how delicate the lugs are. It's a minimalist watch, makes no sense at 39mm.
6119: 39mm x 8.08mm. Should be 35-36mm. The Clous de Paris is visually loud and at 39mm very gaudy. The lug to lug is too big.
5226: 40mm x 8.53mm. Fine with this one as it is aping the field watch look.
>Vacheron
All the Patrimonies are laughably bad. Most of them are 40mm+, very thin dinner plates. Movements obviously too small for the case. Insulting for the money.
Traditionelle: 38mm x 7.77mm. Fine proportions due to the thick lugs.
>Lange
Special case because they don't seem to prioritize thinness on most of their watches and their cases are pretty simple, substantial blocks of precious metal. Most of their watches are appropriately proportioned but obviously get very thick as you get into the high complications.
>JLC
Tend to wear smaller than dimensions suggest due to clever case design. Master Chronograph Calendar is a lovely watch but slightly too big. The default size for the Master Ultra Thin line should be 36 or 37mm, not 39mm. Perpetual calendar looks its age. I'd like to see a new perpetual movement in this line at 37mm.

>>17745874
Some lady pieces are cool too

Why are YOU sleeping on Breitling?

It’s up

https://youtu.be/OjEjHti4fq8

>>17745886
>cut numerals

>>17745898
Yes, and?

>>17745909
They're uh...bad. I don't like them.

...dishonest watchmaking...?

>>17745875
See >>17745799 to understand.
Obese boomers are the only ones buying luxury watches. The average Patek buyer probably has a BMI of 30.
It's safer and easier for brands to make one large watch that fat slobs will buy and then market it to normal people as a MANLY watch for every body else, than it is to make a normal size watch and fail at marketing it to fat boomers.
Watch brands don't care about aesthetics. They only care about money. Right now the market says obese boomers want 40mm dress watches, and every braindead idiots with 16cm wrists think it's great because Andrew Tate called them a bunch of fags on Twitter.

Pic related: the kind of guy calling you a wristlet online because he just bought a 40mm dress watch and realized afterwards it's way too big for him.

>>17745909
>>17745886
Disgusting

The Rolex bubble has burst

>>17745913
>a 36mm watch?? nuh uh I'm not a fag!
>here's a picture of my new watch btw
Many such cases.

>>17745913
I'm actually rich enough to buy the watches you're talking about and I'd strongly recommend you take your meds. Your meltdown is embarrassing.

>>17745774
>n-no you do it pussy im swole af you are fat so you prove it first

>>17745920
>i-is that a perpetual calendar sports watch that is over 36mm?
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH SAVE ME

>>17745924
See, that's exactly the kind of retard I'm talking about here >>17745913
The watch obviously doesn't fit that wrist, but because this complete braindead nigger likes the watch he will completely disregards the actual fit of the watch.
Pure autism. That's actually fascinating if you ask me.

>>17745931
Do you have any idea how mentally ill you look when you spend your days searching for images of people wearing JLCs that look slightly too big and then having an autistic fit over it on 4chan?

>>17745935
>slightly too big
>slightly

>>17745935
>slightly too big
that watch is way too large, the lugs should not be hanging over his wrist like that. He looks retarded.

>>17745937
>>17745938
The guy is in an AD and took a picture too close. You're literally upset about a guy trying on a watch. Unironically have sex

>>17745943
>i-it's fine just believe me
t. just looked at his wrist and realized his watch is too big

>>17745913
This post reeks söy

>>17745943
>You're literally upset about a guy trying on a watch.
My post was just that the watch is not slightly too big. it's way too big for his wrist.

>>17745948
>y-y-y-you're a soiboy
It's okay anon, you can still sell your 42mm Longines with a 60% mark down

>>17745945
>>17745949
Literally no one cares. You're poor and mentally ill.

>>17745949
Welcome to /wt/, where noticing a 44mm watch doesn't fit a 16cm wrist will make you a soiboy seething faggot wristlet for some reasons.

>>17745952
>i-i’m superior because i’m tiny
What’s with that hand, watch and timestamp? Or you’re just a nigger and you’re too afraid of you’re melanin admixture?

>>17745954
>no one cares if my watch is too big, r-right?
Sorry for ruining your week-end anon.

>>17745960
*your melanin admixture

Why the fuck are 90% of watches colored gray/silver, that shit is legit so ugly

Black leather/steel bracelet or black/brown leather is the perfect color. I need a tissot prx in black

>>17745967
Prx is crap anon.

is this a cope rolex?

>>17745954
whatever you say, faggot

>>17745969
god I fucking love the YM. Haters will never understand.
>>17745971
Dial is gay but DJ is their classiest watch desu

the mid-size omega seamaster looks so good, but maybe its too small..?

>>17745971
It”s white god datejust. The most npc dj. I kean I orefer tt or dome bezel on oyster…
Pic rel is a rolex cope and I do own one

>>17745976
YM > Submariner
It’s true
>>17745977
It’s a girls watch anon

>>17745472
You now work for me.

>>17745472
>>17745981
time for you guys to have gay sex.

How do you guys like my womens watch?

>>17745985
Pretty cool considering those hairs inesrt on dial

>>17745989
the what? the acrylic is full of scratches and its missing the pusher for the subdial (which is broken and only counts 30 mins). It's not really worth fixing imo

>>17745983
That’s reserved for Seiko owners

>>17745650
I’m convinced dufour is a secret homosexual has some sweetheart aristocrat deal with ZOG

>>17745539
oh, nice! That one was delivered to me today

>>17745860
most "watch enthusiasts" can't dress for shit and probably walk around in sweatpants all the time. they are also fat, middle-aged men. so don't be surpised that there is such a demand for chunky, clunky casual watches. just as fat and ugly as their owners

>>17745608
How the fuck do people buy a gook watch watchmaking is for aryans only

>>17745985
Cool watch.

>>17745854
what's wrong with the movement? my complaint about it is that it's a bit too big for the classic styling

>>17746020
The SBGM221 from the replies I mean... not the SBGW283

>>17746020
Very nice

>>17745749

>>17745983
you'd like that wouldn't you

>>17746026
Mountain jews are most definitely not Aryan

>>17746020
I like this one, if I were to get a soiko it'd be this or the snowflake

>>17745361
My Casio terrorist recently broke its strap. Looking to see if there's anything else worth considering in the watch world or if I'm just gonna get another one.
No, I'm not putting a Nato strap on it. I need a small watch with a small band.
> Your budget
Under 200 euros. The cheaper, the better.
> Watch type, e.g. dress, diver, pilot
> Movement, e.g. automatic, hand wound, quartz
Just a regular digital watch
> Desired features, e.g. water resistance, day/date, 2nd time zone
Water resistance, date and stopwatch absolutely required.
> Preferred strap option, e.g. leather, nylon, bracelet
Anything but steel. I'll be wearing this in a fridge and steel gets cold.
> Wrist size or desired watch size
Small watch preferred. F-91w has been a good size for me thus far, though the band could be a touch longer to allow more slack at the end.
Oh and it absolutely cannot have a glass front under any circumstances. Plastic only.

>>17746081
Just get the gshock dw5600, maybe the solar one if you want

>>17745985
Too small ang faggy. Get a bigger watch or, alternatively, shave that arm and start wearing cute dresses.

>>17746020
>Imagine paying thousands of dollarinos for something that says Seiko on the dial.
LMAOOOOOO

>>17746086
>shave that arm and start wearing cute dresses.
so you're into that sort of thing, then

>>17746081
>stopwatch absolutely required
I'm curious about why for you a chrono is mandatory? For 99% of the fags itt it absolutely isn't and they pay thousands for ridiculous mechanical ones too.

inb5 muh stakes

>>17746095
No, but your watch's size says you do.

>>17746099
I'm not him. You can shave your entire body and wear your cute dresses while you're with me, though.

>>17746086
>>17746099
you should probably stop thinking about trannies.

>>17746098
I do manual labor and need to time shit accurately quite often
With the F91w it's just 3 clicks to get the stopwatch going without looking at it which allows me to do fast and accurate timing without looking at the watch until after I'm done timing.

ID on the watch?

>>17746081
>I'll be wearing this in a fridge and steel gets cold.
Then why not get a NATO strap? They cover the steel caseback of the watch so no metal touches your skin.

>>17746111
It's an LTP-V007L-9B. Also, checked.

>>17746113
Too bulky, too much risk of it catching on to machinery designed to maim flesh.

>>17746110
Ill be the guy that sugests something out of the box... a 105€ full plastic and rubber swatch chronograph.

All plastic. Date. Times stuff with a dedicated pusher (no need to browse through functions!). WR.

>>17746111
Is nice, but normies will think its your geandmas.

>>17746127
Same advantages but bulkier, and much more tough.

Today my new Tropic strap arrived, very comfy on my SKX013

>>17746119
you work a labor job?

>>17746020
people still buy those shitters?

>>17745985
You should hit the gym to make that fit better. Looks cartoonist on that arm.

I can't find a watch that I like and can afford.

>>17746151
Prouve it, homo

I will be getting a Tudor on my birthday.

>>17745631
I’m Irish so this wouldn’t happen, we don’t approach/acknowledge famous people

>>17746152
Yup.
>>17746085
>>17746127
>>17746142
Out of these the Gshock DW5600 is straight out. Mineral glass front. Can't risk having real glass since even the miniscule chance of it shattering would be catastrofic.
Between the Casio MCW 100H-1A and the Swatch, I'd say thus far the Swatch looks like a better choice as it's slightly smaller, also non-recessed buttons are a plus as it's easier to use with gloves.
Toughness isn't really something I care about as I don't wear the watch for looks so I don't mind if it's scratched to hell and back. If anything I'd say the fuckton of plastic shapes jutting out of the Gshock are a detriment to it since they're more likely to get shaved off by sharp metal objects than a smoother watch design. They're probably better for impact resistance but I'm not planning to use my watch as a hammer.

I'm really missing a timing function on my watch but I don't want to get a bulky dive watch.

What are some small watches that have a timing bezel? I like this one but it's a bit too vintage for my taste. I want something contemporary.

>>17746172
Small and contemporary don't go together. Make up your mind.

And get the Skin Diver.

>>17746163
Imagine having such shit taste that your aspirational timepiece is a fucking Turdor.

>>17746177
huh

>>17746163
based

>>17746178
cringe

I hope its the Pelagos.

>>17746178
t. Seiko owner

Any chance that there is a day-date with the same lumed roman numerals, but without the California dial? I've looked but haven't found anything.

>>17746178
I already own a Rolex. Why can't you understand that people can have more than one nice thing? Are you poor and stupid? Get out of my face.
>>17746190
Either the Pelagos or the Opaline dial gmt.

>>17746118
Thanks Anon

>>17746135
Doesn't matter I'm not spending 18k on cartier tank

>>17746194
You don't need a Tudor tho, just buy another rolex.

>>17746211
No thanks. I want a travel watch that doesn't bring much attention especially when going to Tanzania.

Why everyone in this thread is always so poor when you can just buy crypto or make money in a thousand ways without even leaving your shitty third world communist 40sqm concrete block apartment?

>>17746217
nice larp

>>17746217
all the people who post their watches here are either fat white poltards or new money brown people

Someone gifted me this cheapie years ago. Would you say it fits fine, or is it too big?

>>17746217
Shill me something then. I have 20$ and a blocked bank account.

>>17746224
ALMOST too big but just enough

>>17746227
lol Whj blocked?

>>17746201
You're welcome.

>Just joined the council
What watch to celebrate?

>>17746156
how does that look cartoonish?

>>17746217
>buy crypto
>make money
lol, lmao even

>>17746244
hes not wrong. Pump and dump scam coins are a gold mine.

>>17746254
they were 10 years ago, but you weren't even born then

>>17746254
Not in a bear market

>>17746224
I’d say it looks slightly too big. I once was thinking about buying a Zeppelin. For the price, would you recommend?

>>17746217
You have broke tards and Trump mongoloids who think we're in a recession because they were too stupid to pass econ 101. This thread is for morons.

>>17746241
bulova still makes this:
https://masonicshop.com/masonic-jewelry/details/?id=361792
there is an oddly large number of masonic watches out there, mostly cheap shitters or frankens with custom dials. but maybe some legit high ranking freemason did comission a masonic high whorology watch at some point, back when the organisation was a club for the elite and not just middle class old men with too much time on their hands

>>17746276
holy based

>>17746262
wrong
>>17746266
there are still plenty of gains, theyre just more subdued

>He's wasting money on watches instead of Bored Ape Yacht Club
oh no no no

>>17746287
NFTs are even worse than crypto

>>17746293
No they're not.

>>17746276
Retarded design, they just slapped the logo in the middle and it's being fucked up by the hands.

Why didn't they for example design the hands in the shape of the compass hands, and then put the square below it so that it integrates in the logo at 4:37 or just put other symbols at the hours like some watches (Hamilton, Waltham) do, or anything that isn't just printing it right in the middle.

>>17746224
You've got a bad angle there buddy, watches always look larger from there. As a rule of thumb, the lugs should rest comfortably on your wrist, not portrude over it. Personally, I like that there is a little bit of space between the end of the lug and the width of the wrist, from both ends.

From here, it looks like it might be slightly too wide, but like said the angle could be misleading. Cool watch nevertheless though I'm not a fan of the open heart.

Insurance said they'll get back to my claim for my GMT master 2 stolen in italy in 2 YEARS

Finally copped my explorer

>>17746307
nice fungus

>>17746307
Nice pick bro, is it a 36mm?

>>17746272
Economist here. Please kys immediately

>>17746304
Rugged

>>17746268
yes, I think it's nice for the price. the case finishing is definitely better than what you'll find in many brands at this pricepoint, it has some bretty gud polished accents
movement is a fine old reliable Miyota and not some sussy chinese shit. nothing special to look at, but it does have some geneva stripes. the leather strap it comes on is decent as well, I've tried on much more expensive watches with worse straps
I think the brand could fill a nice niche for people who want a cheap watch with clearly germanic design, even if their actual designs can be hit or miss. probably a slightly underrated brand

>>17746317
Cope and seethe retard. I graduated from Wharton.

>>17746272
Tell that to rising product prices and wages that aren't rising proportionally. It's pretty simple actually

>>17746298
I think Bulova just sells the same design with different printing to whatever organisation wants them
apparently Hamilton had a masonic watch as a legit catalogue option in the 1950s

>>17746310
Thanks bro I don’t know if they’re verrucas or warts.

>>17746314
Yeah 124270

is the only points of the seconds on a mechanical watch to just tell that the watch is running?

>>17746326
it's the beginning stages of diabetes. if you don't believe me, just google it.

>>17746320
my condolences

>>17746242
like cape shit. something a comicbook character would wear....check out the fitment guide

>>17746307
>>17746326
damn Rolex really is for the physically repulsive

>>17746325
>apparently Hamilton had a masonic watch as a legit catalogue option in the 1950s
Yeah and Waltham is also famous for it, they had clocks and pocket watches too, the problem is that the 50s watches are unwearable by today's standards.

Also this insanity exists.

Welp, I just bought a Patek on C24. Guess I'm done with watches now.

>>17746337
No. You might need to time something, even in a basic way.

>>17746326
Give us a loom shot footman

>>17746383
Which model?

>>17745487
>Rolex Explorer 1
Elegant tool watch
>Cartier Tank Tonneau
Timeless clean classic
>Grand Seiko SBGW283
Great finishing
>Omega Seamaster 300
good everyday watch
>Jaeger-Lecoultre Master Control Calendar
useless complication
>Zenith Chronomaster Revival
big and bold
>IWC Ingenieur
too expensive cope
>Patek Philippe Calatrava 6119
boring grail watch
>Vacheron Constantin 222
understated expansive beauty
Shartier or Rolkeks for a 3 watch collection? I already have picrel GS Spring Drive and SMP300.

>>17746033
It's just subpar, bad accuracy and days don't recognize different months. I don't know why I like the design so much, but I just do

>>17746427
>Elegant tool watch

>>17746427
Shartier. it's more different stylistically from the other two and a bit more daring. the Grand Soiko and Omegay already do most of what the LOLex does anyway

Grey & silver... not so bad legibility by night after all imo.

>>17746424
5110G

>>17746447
Couldn't afford a 5230P?

Post YFW you get a watch done and the sub minutes hand STILL DOESN'T"T MOVE despite the wheel moving.

I fucking hate hands.

>>17746461
5110 looks way better. Older is better when it comes to Patek.
Also post your Oris with timestamp.

>>17746473
>Older is better when it comes to Patek.
Coping before you even own the watch. That's really too bad. Should've saved up a little more of your lunch money sport.

>>17746478
Tudor? Longines maybe?

>>17746485
Longines is based, don't put true heritage in the same post with a literal cope watch brand.

>>17746486
>he really is a Longines fag

>>17746485
No one is impressed with your dusty old fagtek.

>>17746492
Let me guess, your grail watch is the Speedmaster

>>17746496
Let me guess, you couldn't afford the one you wanted so you went with an ancient cope. Just kidding, I don't need to guess.

>>17746490
There's a hundred more years of horological history in Longines, not to mention original design language and vision. Tudor is still an abortion of a proper brand, Rolex, finding their cornerstone in making a cheap version of the other brand's heritage.

>>17746492
>>17746496
>>17746510
wtf, can't we just be nice to each others watches. what are you guys trying to prove here? You guys need to lemon down. Life is too short to get mad about mechanical objects.

>>17746520
I love longina

>>17746522
The 5110G is literal rancid dogshit.

>>17746447
>he actually bought a 240 movement
oh no no no...

>>17746520
my dick e=mc2

>>17746527
nice tits lmfao

>>17746520
>my watch group vassal brand is literally brimming with heritage

>>17746520
aren't tudor and rolex owned by the same company
they're just expanding market share to copers

>>17746534
Yes. Rolex revived Tudor to piss in Omega's shoes.

>>17745377
sinn 556i

>>17746350
cape shit? what the hell are you talking about? Its just a 1 hour subdial.

>>17746525
fuck that dufour bevel is immaculate

>>17746534
Tudor is cheaper than Rolex. They are to Rolex what Longines is to Omega these days.

NEW NEW NEW
>>17746582
>>17746582
>>17746582
>>17746582
>>17746582
NEW NEW NEW

>>17746326
They look like Planter’s Warts. I get one on my foot that returns every decade or so. Just apply wart remover periodically and scrape off the dead flesh every so often. Eventually you’ll scrape up the root. Doesn’t really hurt

>>17746496
And you are avatarfagging with anime so anything you have to say can be handily ignored

>>17746646
Explains why the verucca treatment isn’t working. Thanks fellow fungus bro.