/fa/ - Fashion

I want this

first for seiko

Third for Cartier


Fuck rolex lmao

>>17742397
I bought my wife a Cartier recently.
It's class

Stop buying sports watches.

>>17742392
At least post a pic of a Seiko then.

>>17742401
Is this a sports watch?

What’s the consensus on h moser?
Are they good and worth considering, or people are just shilling it because “muh microbrand, they’re the new fp journe”?

>>17742403
is this sun burst or did a geisha fart pink stuff into the dial?

>>17742412
It’s a nice watch

>>17742416
I would get one or two of those

>>17742412
Not really. More a weekday watch.

>>17742416
FP Journe will be remembered long after his death.
H. Moser is a meme brand but some of their designs are nice. Too big though.

>>17742412
Thats not even a scientist watch

Is this the watch thread?

Is this what Omega pre co-axial was? Better than ETA Tudors?

Are there any nice watches that don't look completely generic for $100-200 ? Outside of Casio of course.

>>17742391
Red numerals makes it look tacticool which it doesn't need

Any alternatives for >>17742412?
Looking for something else to have alongside Moonwatch

Iirc I already asked but during Burger hours

>Budget
10k€
>Style
Any
>Complications/strap
Don't matter
>Size
Anything below 40mm looke bad on me. I can try to figure out if 39s with larger wear fit, but Omega Globemaster and Tudor Ranger haven't.

>>17742420
Thank you
>>17742426
What's the difference?
>>17742430
I'm not a scientist

>>17742468
I may agree but it still looks fucking perfect for ke

>>17742386
>>Watch news websites:
Is there a site just for poorfag watch news?
Has there been anything like picrel (in terms of price, size, style) in the past few years? New releases from Seiko 5 seem to be larger, more expensive dive watches.

>>17742482
Can’t go wrong with anything in the Master Control collection. Try looking at the Chopard LUC collection as well. There are some nice pieces in there.

>>17742482
>Anything below 40mm looke bad on me.
So why the fuck are you looking at JLC dress watches? I mean they are understated and under the radar type watches, sounds like you need a larger piece for your wrist.

>10k
Explorer II white dial probably. I guess if you are hell bent on a dressy watch, you have some other options, but I don't see the point in large dress watches, they should be 39mm, the end. Have you considered a Navitimer? They're large but attractive, not gaudy hunks of metal.

>>17742493
Stay the fuck away from Chopard holy shit.

>>17742464
Some Casios, some Orient, some Timex, some Citizen

>>17742417
It used to be a silver sunburst but now much of the silver lacquer is gone revealing the brass underneath. I don't know if you can call it patina or not.

>>17742493
I don't like Chopard too much. I even am on a brink of hating on them for pushing quartz lady watches for Rolex prices
>LUC
At a first glance nithing speaks to me, but need to dive deeper.
Anything in particular you're recommending?
>>17742498
>why jlc dress?
Master Control is 40mm. It's dressier, but not as dressy.
>Exp2
I'm a militant fucktard and I refuse to go grey. It's hard to get it from AD.
I'm on a waitlist for Rhodium YM tho.
>Breitling
Not a Navitimer, but was looking into superocean. Post watch you have in mind.

Also
For full dress I'll probably go with pic rel

>>17742515
>I'm a militant fucktard and I refuse to go grey. It's hard to get it from AD.
But the Explorer II is trading at 1:1 to retail on the grey market, new or like new. I mean maybe 1k over if that. It's a watch that you can really buy grey, if you want it. It's not like a Pepsi that is double price.

>Superocean
Well that's very far off from 10k so you really have to make up your mind. Do you want something around 5k or around 10k? There are several Navitimers that are good, it depends how much money you want to spend and what matters to you. Here is one around 8k.

>>17742519
What’s been up with the Explorer II shilling these last few threads?

>>17742520
Shilling? He wants a 40mil-ish watch that is fairly dressy around 10k, the Explorer II comes to mind.

Need help /wt/
I want to buy a Moonwatch for a friend of mine (he said it's a watch he's always wanted) but I don't understand the difference in these models
Why does the price range from $5K-$8K for what looks like the same watch? Should I just go for the cheapest one?
(Ignore the $20K+ variants)

>>17742523
Okay first of all that page lists discontinued models which is why some are 5k some are 7k. The currently available brand new in the shop Moonwatch is the 7k one. If you need to buy new, this is the only option you have unless you want to pay top dollar on the grey market for the older model brand new. I am gonna assume you need to buy new so I will give you the reference to buy so you can't fuck it up.

31030425001001

DO NOT LET ANYONE AT THE SHOP FOOL YOU INTO BUYING ANY OTHER REFERENCE THAN THIS. Not fucking anyone. Tell them to blow it up their ass and sell the unsellable shit to someone else.

>>17742464
I like the Orient Bambino with arabic numerals
someone also gave me a Zeppelin watch as a gift and it's pretty fun, they have some wacky germanic designs. good case finishing for the price too.

>>17742444
Ceci n'est pas un watch thread

>>17742519
fyi you can get this watch for about $6k MSRP from Breitling AD's. at least when it was first released.

t. former owner of that watch

>>17742528
Yeah but they're all sold out sadly.

>>17742523
Listen to >>17742525. Do NOT buy any other reference.

>>17742529
if it means anything, those little beads along the chapter ring end up giving it a very feminine look to the point where it started to bother me quite a bit, so i sold it.

i am sure it would bother others as well in the long run.

>>17742531
Thank you. I have the Old Navitimer 2 and was thinking about trading it in for the 1959. So you advise against it?

>>17742532
those beads really bothered me, but apart from that it has a solid movement, great dimensions and the accuracy was definitely chronometer grade.

so it's a great watch but only if you can look past those beads. if it had the same outer ridges of the cosmonaute, it would be absolutely perfect.

>>17742401
Im new here and i agree anon i dont like big bulky sports watches

>>17742509
>>17742526
Thanks guys, I checked the orient watches and I really like the bambinos so I think I'm gonna get one of those. I'm kind of disappointed there aren't any open hearted 38mms though because my wrists are really small but oh well. The glass is really cool.

>>17742521
Wait what? The Explorer 2 is the least "dressy" and elegant Rolex there is. It's the last Rolex that actually looks like a sports watch.

>>17742520
It's based?

>>17742554
I'd argue that submariner and Daytona re equally sporty

The lume plots on my 90s Heuer have broken up at two markers. I'm wondering what you think about that, pic related, look at 3 o clock. That's what I have too. Should I try to have someone re-lume this or just ignore it? Visually it does not bother me personally.

>>17742554
I disagree. White dial is more elegant and less sporty by default. The Exp2 also doesn't have a dive bezel making it less sporty as well. And it has a very quiet dial too.

>>17742557
Sure maybe. I think the modern Daytona is way too shiny to be considered a proper tool watch but whatever.
My point is the Explorer 2 is the last watch that comes to mind when you're looking for something dressy.

>>17742567
>My point is the Explorer 2 is the last watch that comes to mind when you're looking for something dressy.
And I say that that's wrong. You are aware that all analog watches are dress watches nowadays right? As far as that one goes, it's quite elegant and less obvious than the Sub.

>>17742562
Just leave it.

>>17742572
Cheers

>>17742412
This watch looks really good. Is there anything like it but quartz and 36-37 mm? I especially need a date, discreet lume on both hands and indices, and a white/silver dial

>>17742564
>>17742569
It's a 42mm piece of fully brushed steel with an orange GMT hand, high contrasted hands and indices, an engraved bezel and a crown guard. You can't let "dressy" than that lmao
Do you also consider hiking shoes to be "dressy"?

>>17742577
>It's a 42mm piece of fully brushed steel with an orange GMT hand, high contrasted hands and indices, an engraved bezel and a crown guard.
...So what? It's still dressy for a large watch.

>>17742401
>>17742444
Why does this general attract annoying spammers

>>17742579
It absolutely isn't, you muppet.
Datejust and Day-Date CAN be considered dressy by Rolex' standards. The Expl2 is the exact opposite of dressy.

>>17742525
>>17742530
What is the importance of that specific reference?
Not doubting just curious
And thanks for the info

Of all the shit opinions I've read in these threads, "the Explorer 2 is ackchyually a dress watch" might take the cake.

>>17742579
No it isnt wtf. If you want dressy just but still sporty just buy a DJ. Lol.

>>17742590
Other refs are shit. Simple as.

>>17742391
what's the ref on this

>>17742619
Jaeger LeCoultre UC4NT4FF0RD1T

>>17742593
The explorer a dress watch tho ngl frfr

>>17742391
reddit watch

>>17742582
Is this the Spam(TM) thread?

>>17742491
Ben's watch club or Just the watch on Yougube, they focus on the affordable stuff. Jody from Just one more watch also reviews plenty of cheap stuff.

>>17742624
kek

>>17742624
Lmao kek even

w2c

>>17742519
I won't buy from g(r)ey market simply because your warranty already runs when it hits the secondary market and I don't give a flying fuck about everyone saying rolex being easy to fix or verify.
>breitling
I ment superocean line is the only breitling I'm remotely familiar with

>>17742634
>JOMW
I have nothing against him he just seems to be the embodiment of onions

>>17742624
don't care I just want to know

>>17742523
He's right >>17742523
You can also go for Nylon strap version and he can always buy the bracelet at his own

>>17742624

>>17742659
No don't do that. The bracelet is much more expensive after purchase than the textile strap is. Also, Omega tend to mate cases with bracelets because there is some wider tolerance on the bracelets. How good and tight it fits will be checked by Omega before it's sold, while you have no idea how it will fit to your case if you buy it later. Might be rattly and have ugly gaps to the case and the like.

But if it's just a gift then who gives a shit I guess, buy the cheaper one if he's not very important to you lmao

>>17742668
I bought bracelet for mine. It was actually few days after quick adjustment was released and I didn't knew that at the moment.
I suggested that simply because it's a gift

>>17742386
No bully pls

>>17742709
People here hate long jeans but I love them and think most of their offerings are great value for money.
I have one that I wear as my work horse for my in office days

>>17742709
Why bully Longines? It’s a great brand maybe missmanaged a little by swatch
>t. Conquest and Hydroconquest owner

Why the hell can’t Omega make a Seamaster that looks like the classic but uses modern technology? Picrel
Like, who needs the helium escape valve?

>>17742718
I really like them but wanted something in less dressy colors cause i got a master in gold and white for my birthday last year so was thinking about this blue one. Maybe in a fee paychecks for now i settled on this which i guess is dressy anyway

Maybe i will get the blue one with moon in a few paychecks

>>17742722
Are you retarded?

>>17742724
Don’t go to tissot. I mean it’s not bad, but it trully is a getaway drug.
Wait a moment and go Longines

>>17742722

>>17742724
I would avoid Tissot. Their mechanical movements are tough to work on and frankly not even really worth it. You’re better just getting a Longines that can be serviced nearly anymore and will be higher quality.

>>17742724
based Tissot enjoyer

>>17742724
>>17742739
>>17742745
I have two tissots, but seriously… if you can afford longines don’t bother

>>17742787
I really like that one but something about the plus in the middle throws me off

>>17742792
It’s not bothering much. I want to sell mine

>>17742715
the new gold zulu time is kino i want one

>>17742567
Looks like a San Martin

>>17742400
Cartier = fashion watches

>>17742491
Archieluxury Livestream nowadays. Should rename it to ArchieAffordableLuxury

>>17742464
Best affordable diver: Citizen NY0040

>>17742569
>Oh, hold on a moment, I'm just putting on my dress watch.

>>17742567
jesus why is that thing so fucking huge?

>>17742416
The latter

They’re just shitters for the insecure rich man, rather than the insecure poor man

>>17742429
at least journe named his stuff after himself
moser's backers had ZERO confidence in their watchmakers such that they had to ressurrect a brand name that's been dead since the russian revolution lmao

>>17742430
>Nice watch anon!
>y-you too
>Actually I'm not wearing a watch, see? *raises tanned and buff wrist with a sexband on it*
>o-oh..
>Anyway that looks expensive!
>y-yeah i'm into w-watches..
>Oh? Would've thought you'd have bought a fancy mechanical watch then!
>w-what do you mean? this is automat-
>You sure about that buddy? The seconds hand is ticking like that. Means It's a quartz watch. I think you got scammed bro
>n-no you don't underst-
>Anyway, I've got a 6:30 rez at Dorsia with Stacey and Stacie so I gotta run.
>-and, it's actually really difficult to make *[keeps speaking mentally long after the other party has gone]

>>17742828
I want a George floyd watch with a rotating derek Chauvin that kneels on his neck at 12 o'clock. That would be top tier

How shitty is the caliber inside this Zodiac Olympos? Looks great, 40mm and 200wr...

>>17742847
You can just show the back...

Fuck normies anyway. And Paul Allen in particular.

>>17742832
It's 42mm and the guy is wearing it below the wrist bone.

>>17742848
PP would be MORE THAN HAPPY to make it bespoke for you. Or maybe JLC.

>>17742847
what the fuck is a sexband?

>>17742567
looks like the shittiest vintage tag heuer clone in existence. it's so ugly, I can't believe rolexfags will sitll eat this slop up

>>17742864
>he doesn't know
lol way to out yourself, cherryboy

Use 3 words or less to describe this watch.

>>17742880
Piece of shit.

>>17742880
Overloaded

>>17742880
lol mess

>>17742880
Vomit-inducing

>>17742880
Wabi-sabi.

>>17742668
How much is the strap by itself and where do you get it? Don’t see it on the website

>>17742880
gold intestinal puke

>>17742880
>spring drive
another word for quartz

>white date not matching the color of the dial
>hours and minutes in silver but seconds in gold

>>17742908
Because the center seconds hand is for the chrono, and the other two chrono subdials use gold hands.

>>17742908
>>white date not matching the color of the dial
That's the least shocking thing about this watch. Have you seen the size of these indices? If the date disc was the same color as the dial it would look even more unbalanced.

>>17742901
Yeah you have to get the AD to order it. The strap itself is like 250 and the fold over clasp is 350. Roughly.

>>17742933
I’m not paying $600 for a nylon strap I’ll just put it on a nato lol

What is a good gypsy watch?

>>17742936
You can get it without the clasp and just use a cheap one instead, many will fit.

The band is really good and it's different from a NATO. I don't like NATO because they make the watch sit higher, that double thickness under the head.

>>17742940
Fake Submariner

>>17742880
>>17742893

>>17742986
That was a joke anon, that GS is obviously the opposite of wabi-sabi.

>>17742969
>I don't like NATO because they make the watch sit higher, that double thickness under the head.
You know you can just cut that second layer off, right?

>>17742864
Don’t worry about it.

>>17743001
What's the point? Just get a textile strap.

>>17742880
Design blunder. If modern GS has ever made a good chronograph, I haven't seen it. Bizarre.

>>17742815
>first wrostwatch is fashion brand
By this logic every brand is fashion brand

>>17742832
Maybe you're tiny?

>>17743018
>every brand is fashion brand
Yes.

>>17743021

>>17743014
They should either design a proper good looking chrono or quit making them altogether.

>>17743024
>How do I look with my RAWLEXXX?

Also
Lmao @ wristlets. You bitch ass tiny fags

>>17743026
Very nice. Here's a picture of my 41mm Datejust.

>>17743026
>>17743033

I guess being a redditor isn't so bad after all

>>17742464
Vostok

>>17743033
Pure class

>>17743047
Overhyped trash
Gentleman > Prx

>>17743009
>>17742870
so this is the real way to get attention from girls (if you're a middle schooler)??
bros... why do we even bother with watches... the 15 year old SEXband chads are laughing at us

I hate those fags like you wouldn't believe. The nigger on the right is such a fag that it's ubelievable.
Also
Strong gay vibes

>>17743047
>fake gold

Why are the anons obsessed with dress watches? Who wears a suit nowadays? Almost nobody. Have you seen the size of moderm dress watches? a Calatrava is nearly 40mm in diameter and most Lange's are thicker than a Submariner.

>>17743047
the quartz version is based, but I wouldn't buy one with their sussy movement. better to go for a Citizen Tsuyosa

>>17743075
you don't need to wear a dress watch with a suit, they fit perfectly well with just a shirt, or basically anything that isn't a hoodie and flip-flops

>>17743075
bro you can dress down a dress watch with a different strap choice

I think i have fallen in love with this reverso-tank cope anons.

>>17742880
LOOK AT WRIST

>>17743026
ok fatso.

>>17743075
>Have you seen the size of moderm dress watches? a Calatrava is nearly 40mm in diameter and most Lange's are thicker than a Submariner.
Modern calatrava are not the only calatrava that have ever existed you know.

>>17743075
I wear a dress watch 6 or 7 days out of the week and rarely wear a suit. I just prefer them to sport watches.

>>17743075
No such thing as a "dress watch". Before the sports watch epidemic they were just called "watches". "Dress watches" are just the purest form of watches. Their sole purpose is to give you the time. Ask a kid to draw a watch, he'll actually draw a "dress watch".
>metal case
>dial
>2 or 3 hands
>strap
No water resistance, no metal bracelet, no complications. Everything else is a derivative from "dress watches".

>>17743083
>>17743091
>>17743114
>>17743120
The point is, what kind of fagot has a watch to wear with a suit, another watch to go to the beach, another special watch to wear with jeans?

>>17742940
steal someone's submariner

>>17743136
Not Bond, thats for sure.

>>17743120
Gyal yuh watches gud

>>17743136
Huh? You don't need a watch for every occasion. You can definitely wear a sports watch to a wedding or whatever, no one cares anymore. Hell if you wear an Explorer 1 with a suit you'll still be mogging 99% of people there wearing FitBits and Apple watches.

>>17743092
I like the sector dial and case shape, it’s a little thicc but overall good watch

>>17743136
people who consider buying watches a hobby

>>17743064
I hate almost every "watch youtuber". They are such fucking corporate mouthpieces and whitebread jokes. I hate Teddy the most, that fucking tasteless Ledditor.

>>17743076
>nooo not le plastic movement
How much is it like 800 bucks? I'll throw it away in a few years when they hype dies down and I'm bored with it
Who the fuck gets a mall watch serviced in the first place?

>>17743147
I don't really blame them. It's an unfortunate reality that they need to be very lukewarm with their takes to maximize viewership, and god forbid they say something bad about a certain brand and don't get invited to their events. I just don't really watch any of them because I feel they aren't trustworthy.

>>17743155
Archie is mostly trustworthy. His opinion sometimes changes because his taste changes but no way he's holding back hate because he already has no views and no sponsor money.

cant decide bros
Rolex OP black dial or
Rolex DJ two tone gold fluted bezel motif

>>17743160
Neither. Stop buying fucking cope Rolexes. Get a proper one or don't.

>>17743160
picrel 2

>>17743158
Yeah you're definitely right about that. I do watch Archie on occasion these days but memes aside he helped me make good buying choices when I was first getting into watches.

>>17743147
The only watch channel I regularly check is Watchbox Reviews. 5 minutes videos, just facts about one watch, no bullshit.
The ABSOLUTE WORST are these 3 faggots.

>>17743161
what is a proper rolex then plz dont say daytona i think it looks shit

>>17743136
if you wear a shirt most of the time, for example for work, a dress watch can easily be your daily watch

>>17743160
Love the two tone DJ, hate that particular dial. Just personal preference.

>>17743163
Same here. I agree with Archie on most watch issues nowadays, only I don't care for dress watches or collecting one brand (Rolex).
>>17743164
Watchbox is good yeah it's just straight up facts and then he fucks off.

>>17743075
you make one good point which is that most dress watches nowadays are 40+mm and all that empty space makes them look like diner plates
so brands are sabotaging their offering by making disproportionately large watches because they believe that's what people want then in turn people avoid dressier options because they look absolutely comical and in turn brands see that dress watches don't sell for shit so they mostly make sports watches instead which sell because they still look ok on the larger sizes

>>17743167
Any steel sports, any of them. "Professional" line is what they are officially called. Sub, Gmt, Explorer, even Air king.

>>17743160
2 tone fluted, op black dial is so basic it hurts

>>17743167
>what is a proper rolex then plz dont say daytona i think it looks shit
man...

>>17743160
>>17743162
Jesus man... Are you the anon who's hesitating between these two Rolex and that silver dial JLC?
Just make a choice already, you've been asking the same question for weeks.

I've asked before and I will ask again: why does no one make this kind of Braun style mechanical watch? Mondaine comes the closest but that one feels wrong in mechanical. Nomos and Junghans Max Bill are cool but dated. Sinn is too military inspired.

>>17743120
great taste. best Nomos, best Cartier, some of the best JLC and Lange watches. the Nomos is as casual as you will ever need. perfect collection.

>>17743176
You’re not a professional.

>>17743164
It's fucking garbage. One retard with a lisp, other retard and even more retarded nigger

>>17743154
service costs for shitters aren't that much if you know the right guy, I only paid 50$ last time I serviced my 200$ Miyota shitter. and I'm never going to endorse making products proprietary or disposable, especially for something like a mechanical watch of all things

>>17743192
Thanks that's very kind. Not pictured are all the bizarre choices I've made over the years from Seiko to Panerai to Omega to Rolex to a bunch of G-shocks and I'm still not happy with the watches pictured - I'm probably going to sell the Nomos and Cartier for a perpetual calendar in the next year or two.

>>17743189
Ochs und Junior springs to mind

>>17743175
I think we're starting to go towards smaller watches again, thankfully

>>17743184
No im different that anon is deciding between the everose two tone.

>>17743189
some of the Brew watches have that sort of industrial bauhaus aesthetic to them

>>17743210
I think it's not too uncommon to get memed into buying a bunch of clunky """versatile""" sports watches only to realise you just prefer dress watches.

>>17743147
Apart from nip channels I skim to see video footage of watches, who don't irritate because I don't understand them anyway, I'll listen to watchartsci because he's not a FOTM shilltuber cunter and talks about interesting stuff the shillers don't.
If not for his vids I'd have never even thought to consider a silicon hairspring as an undesirable thing for a watch that I'd want.

>>17743221
why do non-chronograph watches have sub-second indices?

>>17743228
Because the designer went
>OH NOOOOOOOES IT'S TOO UNCLUTTERED AND UN-SHIT I'M GOING INSAAAAAAAANE SAVE ME STEAKTIMER REEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>17743064
The green one is legitimately hateable.

>>17742847
This has been one of the best wt threads, so many epic wins

>>17742386
So wait if I want to buy this watch and can just pay do I really have to play some game with the watch store where we jerk each other off and I have to sit and wait an unspecified amount of months?

Or is this only on certain models? Unironically them making me wait like a bitch that is trying to make me jump through hoops for me to be able to fuck her makes me angry and not want to fuck with these watches

>>17743258
Depends where you live. You may though. If they don’t like the looks of you they may never sell you one or you may get one after one or two months. The hype has died down some but OPs are still oddly a little tough to find at retail.

>>17743263
nta but is it even possible to get this

>>17743120
From left to right:
Gay
Trash
Woman
China
Stop buying dress watches

>>17743258
OP is hard to get in everything above 36mm
Only lady sizes and djs are somewhat available

>>17743279
Post collection.

>>17743266
No.
But OPs are selling at retail on grey.

>>17743301
>he can’t take criticism without being able to return it
Pathetic and insecurepilled

>>17743304
Is getting a Rolex on grey a good idea?

>>17743301
he won't, because he knows his fugly clunky shitter of a low to mid tier diver will be openly mocked

>>17743316
I won’t buy anything grey.

Question for my dear NATOchads:
So I've bought 2 straps from 2 different chink sellers on aliexpress: one of them is very malleable and stretches a little bit, very comfortable to wear. The other is made of a very hard type of fabric (I guess) and has zero stretch. Which one is the closer to a real nato strap?

>>17742386
Just got this back from a service. I'll give it a full buff and polish tomorrow

>>17743359
i bought a tissot le locle grey it's literally fine

>>17743164
I hate these niggers so much it's unreal

>>17743383
is it any good?
basically spoonfeed me on bulgari

>>17743075
Formal watches are simple and unassuming. They admit they’re jewellery which makes them less pretentious (paradoxically) than sport watches which try to hide behind some kind of function or intention. A dress watch could be an affectation you forgot to take off after work, could have been given to your father or grandfather or whatever else, it doesn’t make you a ‘watch guy’. If a watch like a submariner is like a college ring, a formal watch is a wedding band

>>17743406
Retard take. Dress watches are for incels.

>>17743405
nah. It's basically a Tag Aquaracer movement in a chunky heavy Bulgari case/strap.

>>17742391
I too will pay wild amount of money for a Valjoux 77** shitter.

>>17743368
They aren’t supposed to stretch very much.

New Tudor Black Bay Pro for $3k or Rolex Explorer 2 used for $5.5k? (I already own a Rolex)

>>17743440
Neither

>>17743441
why i want a gmt for my birthday

>>17743414
damn you are so right. I'm an incel. :^)

>>17743444
Just save your money

>>17743449
nah

>>17743444
trips of truth
black bay pro

>>17743444
the black bay is fucking thick, looks really pretty in pictures but wears like a brick. have you tried one on?

>>17743467
i have and it felt like the gmt master , i don't mind thicc watches for gmts or divers

>>17743468
as long as you're happy with it I say get the Tudor, it's cheaper, it doesn't look bad, and you already have a Rolex.

>>17743468
The Tudor GMT's would be better value for money if they all came on the jubilee

>>17743440
If you have a Rolex why are you buying cheaper watches for poors lmfao? You gonna slap a "my other watch is a Rolex" sticker on them lollllllllll???

>>17743474
I travel between the U.S, South Africa, Taiwan and Tanzania frequently and my Oyster perpetual is not a good watch for this.

>>17743475
Sussy ass travel

>>17743474
>If you have a Rolex why are you buying cheaper watches for poors lmfao?

>>17743475
>my Oyster perpetual
Well there's your answer. Entry-level. Probably purchased second hand.

>>17743475
Why not all the other pedos wear a Rolly lmfao.

>>17743479
Definitely purchased second hand.

>>17743477
>Sussy ass travel
Huh?

Tudor, Rolex. All scams!

>>17743496
>buy sub at msrp
>sell sub for $5k over msrp
Wow I totally got scammed omg anon

>>17743501
You funded liberals

>>17743479
Not that anon but Oysters cost more than the Explorer nowadays on grey.

>>17743501
You do know that Rolex donates all their profits to "climate causes".. Right? Pol would be ashamed of you FREAK

>>17743444
Gotcha senpai

>>17743505
Right but they're mountain Jews so they never technically have profits

>>17743509
Shut up you anti maga libtard freak

>redneck poor rural retards and suburbnite cucks
>poorfags larping
this thread continues to stink

>>17743514
we can’t let this guy get the nuclear codes

>>17743440
Explorer ii. Where are you getting one for that cheap tho?

>>17743512
Obsessed. The smart conservatives realize the jew when they see it

>>17743519
>smart conservatives
No such thing

>>17742853
Don't they use Fossil movements?

>>17742386
Can i micro adjust this watch keeps falling passed the bony part of wrist when i hold my arms down and it makes me mad, cant take a link out because then it would be too tight

>>17743490
See >>17743480 chomo.

>>17742880
bit much init

>>17743120
You can sell them all and get yourself a nice little seiko 5.

>>17743543
I don’t get it. Is there pedo shit going on there or something? Just seems like nig and gook town

>>17743533
Nope

>moonphase exists but sunphase doesnt
What do I care about the moon for? Im not a women. I want to know how much sun is left in the day at this time of the year

>>17743517
It's the old black dial from watchtrader & co when i visit the uk on my birthday

Tupoop and Gaylex are such scams. Real MAGA men wear Omega and Grand Seiko.

>>17743575
literally called a day/night cycle you fucking idiot

>>17743575
>he hasn't realized every watch measures the sun

>>17743575
>Im not a women
GOOD MORNING SIR

>>17743508
Best in the thread

>>17743533
take out a half link

>>17743533
That’s not how you buckle it.

Trying to see of I can get over my dislike of chronographs.
What's a decent, cheaper one I can purchase to see?
Moomswatch?

>>17742709
>long jeans

based actually. a friend of mine has been eyeing one for the longest time now while looking at jewelry stores. I wonder what it takes to get a hand-me-down for cheap as a gift.

>>17743575
>What do I care about the moon for?

tide ebb and flow, going deep into astrology

>>17742416
they did a couple of silly ads which is why not everyone takes them seriously but they do some interesting things with their watches. they offer the most elegant perpetual calendar displays on the market and they managed to find their own brand identity in an already saturated niche market. the streamliner for example is identifiable as a moser and clearly a 70's inspired watch without taking direct influence from any particular 70's watch

>>17743575
Because it's impossible to make.
Dawn and sunset change every day by a few seconds. Your mechanical watch can't keep track of that. Buy a smartwatch if you need that function.

Im not gonna lie...

>>17743721
looks like a kids or young girl version of the MRW200h, just without the day of the week complication. it's a great watch.

Well it happened

I lost my gmt master 2 in Italy or it got stolen

>>17743735
How do you even lose a watch?

>>17743717
No it isn't, vacheron did it.

>>17743741
I was walking around Milan and it was just fucking gone.

>>17743755
I superglue all my strap link bars now due to this.

I like lume watches that glow in the dark, my budget is 150, which watches could I get?

>>17743755
Why would you lie an anonymous board?

God the octo finissimo looks so fucking good I wish I could afford one

>>17743760
why would i lie about my watch being stolen. i'm heartbroken and i filed a police report with the italian police

>>17743755
Was is on a leather strap or something?
It's pretty much impossible to "lose" your watch or have it stolen without noticing if it's on a bracelet

>americans suffering
MOAR

>>17743764
>heartbroken
But I thought a Rolex was just pocket change? Buy another one lmao.

>>17743760
>crime would NEVER happen in shitaly
LOL!

>>17743774
I was on the list for 3 years and €12,000 spend on it

>>17743769
i put it on leather because it's hot in italy and im used to paris weather

>>17743406
beautifully written post, and 100% true. a sneedmaster is pretentious, a cartier tank is effortless.

>>17743778
French people sure are stupid hahahah

my grandpas watch he got as a gift from a factory he was working at

>>17743784

im never seeing my gmt master again arent i

>>17743788
Don't worry dude, Mario is sure to hand in a 12k watch and not just sell it to a pawn shop!

How dumb do you have to be to walk around with 12 grand strapped to your wrist and not expect a pickpocket to lift it?

>>17743735
It 100% got stolen. Walking around an Italian tourist destination like Milan with a Rolex is suicide, those places have some of the best pickpockets in the world.
If you want le traveller watch, get a Seiko GMT, unironically.

>>17743778
Yeah that's bullshit.
Fuck off.

>>17743791
Even Italy? I thought a lot of people there already had designer, so it wasn’t that big of a deal.

>>17743748
Vacheron really is the pinnacle of watchmaking.

>>17743735
Post proof of your ownership.

>>17743735
lol
LMAO
cope and seethe

>>17743759
steeldive 1970

>>17743795
Is there anything sadder than delusional Parisians?

>>17742386
What is the absolute best quartz watch (for features and accuracy) money can buy? Do not say FP Journe, I'm pretty sure the actual calibre is completely BTFO by Citizen's LOW end calibres.

>>17743795
>>17743735
There’s no way you’re being serious. No way you’re this retarded.

>>17743795
Italy, world-reknowned for its organised crime and with so many rich tourists begging to be fleeced? Nah, pickpocketing is rife in tourist destinations over there. Our tour guide even told us to take all our valuables out of our pockets and put them into backpacks or somewhere else safe before stepping into the Rome subway.

>>17743807
Citizen 0100.

>>17743813
>There’s no way you’re being serious. No way you’re this retarded.
Assuming it's true, he did bought a lolex. Everything is posible when being that retarded.

>>17743797
Has Poortek made a grand complication that rivals this in their entire history? I don't think so. They made a star map I believe, but it wasn't this complicated.

>>17743786
>prvomajska
Are you from the Balkans? Neat looking watch, wear it with pride.

>>17743807
Citizen 0100 or Grand Seiko 9F, everything else is far behind.

>>17743807
>for features and accuracy
My 40 year old Seiko was about 2 seconds out every 6 months when I adjusted for DST, and cost me 30 bucks. Feature wise, it completely mogged all the "high end" modern quartz stuff, given it offered both day/date and a diver bezel. Didn't hit the second markers, though.

>>17743820

>>17743824
The "grande complication" is such bullshit.
Patek has always been about annual/perpetual calendars, chronographs and world timers in small compact cases. Nobody gives a shit about these 20mm thick star maps grande sonnerie whatever. Those watches aren't even meant to be worn.
I hate modern Patek and modern watchmaking so much it's unreal.

>>17743791
>>17743735


Bruh another W for the Ciganis

We love our Romanians dont we folks


How stupid do you have to be to wear a "luxury" watch as a tourist?

NEW THREAD
>>17743838
>>17743838
>>17743838
>>17743838
>>17743838

>>17743835
I'd much rather see watchmakers create something nifty and novel with an impressive mechanism rather than go the Rolex route and just crank out the same mass-produced shit forever
you can just treat the grand complications as the "runway" collection from fashion houses. it's just something fun and out there to demonstrate the skill of the people working for the brand.

>>17743847
but GS Kodo is weeb trash, right?

>>17743831
My 40 year old Seiko is about 15s slow per month but hits almost all the markers. It does have a screw to regulate it so i might fiddle with it one day. It's a proper movement though with a metal base plate, basically built from a mechanical movement but quartz.

>>17743777
casio sisters, we won

>>17743798
this

>>17743778
I'm going to choose to believe this because I hate the French

>>17743853
sounds cool, whats the ref no?

Does anyone else autistically hate digital watches/clocks? It's analog or nothing. If I wanted to see giant numbers I'd check time with my phone

>>17744228
my casio is small and just works
your phone is big and dies after a day or two

How good is the Casio Edifice EQB1100XDC1A for a beginner watch? I'm sorry that I'm a brokie from a third world country that can't buy real shit so ima have go for a master copy but I think that watch looks elite

Talk to me more on why fake watches are shit. These ones are not exactly chinkfactured, the seller says that these are master copies from japan that use the miyota movement internals and all the extra buttons for the chronograph work as well

>>17744343
>master copies from japan
prob just some NH35 movement watches sold on the cheap. not bad, not great.

>>17742386

>a 10k watch that will raise in value
go.

>>17744461
How can I verify whether the movement is actual miyota or not? I can tell him to open up the watch but I know jackshit about watches so a little help on that would be appreciated.

Otherwise it's a pretty good grab no? $320 watch for around $60

>>17743133
Thanks for your retarded opinion, faggot. Now go kill yourself.
>>17743136
This is the watch thread on a fashion board, mongo. Put your helmet back on, the non-retarded kids are talking.

>>17742412
no faggot