/fa/ - Fashion

Try not to ruin this thread, you spiteful goblins.

First for JLC

Seconding with Moonwatch

tempted to post the snoopy copypasta

>>17732646
Post it

Suggest a warch for me
>10k€ +/-2k
>whatever type
>whatever features. doesn't even have to have date
>bracelet or leather
>40-42mm
It may be similar to pic rel

>>17732655
just get pic rel and be done with it

How do people who own a chronograph without a small seconds hand even know how accurate their watch is?

>>17732655
Buy the JLC, you won't regret it

Is this the watch thread?

>>17732639
this looks like a frederique constant watch

>>17732639
>>17732660
Kino?

>>17732639
Why do all watches look like cheap shit now?

>>17732659
yeah with that shitty meme of a watch you'll fit right in

>>17732659
Look sick, don't mind the retards here with 10th hand Oysters

You can save one (1) Swiss brand from the upcoming nuclear holocaust.
Which one?

Hard mode: no Rolex

how are the soviet era watches?
how is their quality?
how do the versions made for export differ beyond the translated logo?

>>17732675
>Hard mode: no Rolex
>oh no, no more generic steel band sports watches
PP

>>17732675
Doxa.

>>17732675
NO AGAIN NOOOOOOOOOO

>>17732675
Actual swiss or "swiss" like 99% of swiss watchmakers?

>>17732691
"Swiss made"

>>17732654
blatant example how white dial is much more legible

>virgin world time vs the chad escale time zone

i... i swear i'm not a wristlet

>>17732658
Why is a dog wearing a watch, kek?

>>17732655
>silver hands and indicies
>silver dial
you will regret it

>>17732727
Not really. The hands are polished and beveled so they always catch the light and provide contrast against the dial. Legibility is no problem.

(And yes, yes, I know you're just forcing the legibility meme.)

>>17732741
Yes. This. Part of the design is to make you perform slight movements of your hand to position your watch to read it thus calling attention to it and making the wearing and utilization of the timepiece not just a workaday tool but a performance. It's literally egineered that way. It drives women insane btw, they fucking love to hate on it.

>>17732741
This.
I posted thi jlc and seen it in person. It works really well.
Also
I had longines conquest with silver dial. It’s legible

>>17732760
>It drives women insane btw, they fucking love to hate on it.
looking at your watch? or silver on silver

>>17732760
I don’t have a pussy so I don’t care

>>17732662
It’s just bafflingly bad pictures and renders. It’s why a 5227R looks like an AliExpress shitter on their website but actually looks good in person. Many, many, many such cases and why I reserve judgment on most watches until I see them in person.

>>17732782
That yours? Very sexy, well wear friend

>>17732782
Imagine having a wrist that makes 39mm looks big, lmao

>>17732789
It’s not
>>17732790
Wristlets
Will they ever learn?

>>17732700
The black dial is legible just fine.

Post ufo watches

>>17732807

>>17732782
It's actually crazy how the websites of the most prestigious brands (PP, AP, ALS, VC, FPJ, JLC, etc) have zero actual shots of the watches they make.
I get why cheap brands do it (actually I don't, just show the fucking real thing whatever the price), but when you keep jerking off about "muh finishing" the least you can do is show actual photographs of your products.

6.25" wristlet here, am I allowed to wear dive watches?

this arrived yesterday. swapped the metal band for a cheap leather strap. would black nylon be better? it's for casual use and I'd wear it during sports

>>17732826
39.5mm planet ocean
46mm lug to lug, ez pz

>>17732826
>6.25" wristlet here, am I allowed to wear dive watches?
Of course. There's no law that says you can't.
But, at the same time, just be aware that a large watch on a skinny wrist will always look goofy.

still my favorite

>>17732830
You forgot to mention
>16mm thick

>>17732826
most brands have a women's section

>>17732838
Post collections. Poorfags with digital shitters welcome too

>>17732838
>>17732841
Didn't mean to quote

Why do I feel like a quartz prx would be better than an automatic? Should I just not care about the prx plastic non serviceable movement?

>>17732845
nah bro get the thick, heavy, inaccurate, mass produced automatic. it has soul!

>>17732845
not only you wont get the shitty movement but it'll be way more accurate being a quartz watch. also it's cheaper and you get the same design. It's just better in every way.

If you're looking for a good movement watch, look for Spring Drives. Thats a personal opinion tho, I knows theres alot of shitters in the watch threads hating on Grand Seiko for no clear reasons.

>>17732850
>hating on Grand Seiko for no clear reasons.
quartz with more moving parts and expensive services? sounds amazing sensei

>>17732849
>>17732850
Which prx should I get if I already have a green tsuyosa? I was really liking the gold colored one but it might look tacky with casual clothes

>>17732853
don't get a prx they're incredibly mediocre and not in a 1,000,000 times folded nippon steel way

>>17732852
theres no quartz in the Spring Drive.

Doesn't it get tiring to be that stupid?

>>17732856
you know what i mean faggot

>>17732850
>Thats a personal opinion tho, I knows theres alot of shitters in the watch threads hating on Grand Seiko for no clear reasons.
There's a lot of legitimate reasons to hate on Grand Seiko but Spring Drive is not one of them. I hate Grand Seiko because their chronographs and divers are fucking ugly and they think meme dials are a substitute for good design.

>>17732865
ill give you that, the poop color swirl one sucks but at this point its subjective. to each their own.

The problem with Grand Seiko is it has "Seiko" in the name.
I'm not paying 10k for a fucking Seiko lmao

>>17732855
>incredibly mediocre
Explain, cause I usually buy any watch that I like, and you can't fuck up a quartz

>>17732856
>theres no quartz in the Spring Drive.
Yes there is. They replaced the traditional balance wheel with an integrated circuit containing a quartz crystal.

>Doesn't it get tiring to be that stupid?
Faceplant.

>>17732868
I mean, a grand seiko at least is worth the 10k unlike a rolex whose price comes from marketing alone.

>>17732871
>theres a battery in my car so it's an electrical car

holy shit, you made it even worse lol. room temperature IQ.

>>17732877
Wait, wait...you think the "quartz" part of a quartz watch is a BATTERY??

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAH!!!

>>17732881
you know what i mean faggot

>>17732877
Here you go, you sad moron.

https://www.ablogtowatch.com/history-seiko-spring-drive-movement/

Educate yourself.

Talk me out of it.

>>17732856
What's that in the lower left-hand part of this pic?

>>17732883
little shit can't make a difference between spring drive and quartz watches. go jerk off in your invicta watch collection.

>>17732882
F

>>17732883
So basically the spring drive is a true hybrid between automatic and quartz. Cool as fuck but I wouldn't pay 10k

>>17732886
wheres the spring barrel??

>>17732873
>a grand seiko at least is worth the 10k
lmao no

>>17732886
>>17732891

WOW, exactly like a Spring Drive!

>>17732887
I accept your concession.

>>17732890
>So basically the spring drive is a true hybrid between automatic and quartz. Cool as fuck but I wouldn't pay 10k
Yeah. The cost...that's up to the individual.

But yeah, the mainspring powers a coil that creates electrical energy that powers the quartz regulator, which in turn feeds the information to the circuit which operates a brake, speeding up and slowing down the gear train as necessary.

>>17732895
stay mad. I'll still get my dick sucked wearing my SBGA375, while you will be browsing through these threads looking at watches that you will never be able to buy.

>>17732901
Lmao.
Remember to pick up all those rakes for the next thread so you don't step on them again.

>>17732837
Based

Friendly reminder to ignore GSfags.

was this the roak homage made by the roak designer? help me with the lore

>>17732904
Love the SM Diver, but it's been in dire need of a refresh.
Make it thinner, make the bracelet thinner and give it a taper.
I'd like them to go back to the smaller, tighter waves like they did with the Bond 60th anniversay version.

>>17732904
Finishing looks cheap

what does he wear
???

>>17732907

greasy fingers who post this always end up showing their Islander watches. Pathetic...

>>17732908
No, you're thinking of the IWC Ingenieur which uses the same movement as this Baume & Mercier (2023 version).

>>17732913
probably a full lume dial to use during his spelunking

>>17732917
Dude lives in a hole, how would he charge the lune?

>>17732924
Graphite chunk that stays warm for some reason

>>17732865
>I hate Grand Seiko because their chronographs and divers are fucking ugly
True.
> and they think meme dials are a substitute for good design.
They still do good non-meme design it's just that the meme dials are what they became famous for so they have to keep them going if they want to sell. If GS was exclusively a non-meme watch brand they probably wouldn't be able to exist. They still make a banger every now and then, but for every banger they have to first make, market and sell 10 meme watches.

>>17732913
A gshoock

>>17732904
Heres another one I took. Did you buy it? If so, how do you like it?

>>17732913

>>17732837
>>17732904
>>17732933
inb4 omega is chinese trash poster shows up

>>17732913
It has a counter for up to 18 holes.

>>17732884
Bronze watches suck

>>17732904
Omega is based

>>17732941
>Hublot

>>17732948
is the hesalite or the sapphire one?

>>17732941
Hublot is unbelievably based.

>>17732951
Hesalite, of course. Sapphire is not space flight qualified.

>>17732953
I was waiting on a call for the Explorer 40mm but honestly, I think I'm going to go for this one instead. Better history and dial.

>>17732939
Trash? No. They offer nice watches.
But Omega does have chinese made components in their products. The question that remains is to what degree they lie about it. How much of the watch, which you've paid a high Swiss reputational price for, is made by some Guanzhou coolie for peanuts per hour?
Financial cuckery is usually something to avoid.

>>17732954
You know what’s gonna happen, right? You’re gonna buy the sneedy and Rolex is going to call you two weeks later. Happened to me after I bought my Seamaster.
>>17732955
He’s here! Time to seethe about Omega, right on schedule.

>>17732955
> high Swiss reputational price
You’re not though. Omega is decidedly low tier pricing. Rolex is mid tier pricing. Longines is dumpster tier. Consult the chart and don’t speak to me again.

>>17732954
Forgot to add, the only thing that sucks is the clasp is sharp as fuck. Other than that, the sneedmaster is incredible. Definitely recommend hesalite, it’s not as vulnerable as internet concern fags make it out to be, and the closed caseback looks way cooler. The sapphire milky halo is gross anyways. Check out both in person if you can.

Is this too feminine?

>>17732958
>liver spots
Did 4chan become a site for old people or something?

>>17732961
Nah. I know this big crazy ass buff looking mexican dude at the gym that wears that exact watch. It looks normal, even on big wrists. Probably more along the lines of, if you already look feminine then that watch won't help, but if you don't, then you're fine.

>>17732964
No, there are still plenty of young people on /fa/ but they're usually in the threads about clothes, not accessories.
Old people can't fit into nice clothes anymore so they just give up and dress like shit, hoping that a nice watch can compensate.

If you were in high school when the site started, you'd be nearly 40 years old now. If you're here and you're over 40, though. Just give up.

Stop buying sports watches.

>>17732968
oh yeah? what are you going to do? shoot me?

>>17732947
Why

>>17732966
Lol, good to know. Asking because I thought this one would be less, but then I'd have to buy online and wait.

>>17732957
loooool
so you're overpaying for low tier junk by your own admission? lmao not the own you thought it was, huh? retard

>>17732971
If you don't scrub it enough it'll leave oxide marks on white dress shirts.

>>17732961
Buy the superior A700

>>17732971
It oxidizes and it’s just cope for 18k gold

>>17732968
>Stop buying sports watches.
OK.

>>17732964
Nah, those are freckles and moles and shit from living in a latitude that I don’t belong in. I’m 31, been here since 2008

Nice yacht master you got there.

>>17732990

>>17732994

>>17732760
>what time is it?

>>17732994
>>17732996
I feel bad for omegachuds.
I want to buy an omega but god damn the brand is making itself looks bad.

>>17732827
Cool watch. I think anything would look better than that strap.

>>17732826
I wouldn't unless it's digital.

>>17732632
Rolex AD anon here.
Send rare watches.

>>17732931
>meme watches.
such as

i am become JLC, the destroyer of accuracy

>>17733007
AMA

now i am become Lange, the destroyer of heritage

>>17732782
how tiny are your wrists lmao
pick up some weights you goober

now i am become Omega, the destroyer of escape wheel

>>17732994
>>17732996
Everyone loved those Rolexes and rightly called the Omegas rip offs.

now i am become Hublot, destroyer of residual value

>>17732994
The titanium ceramic model is pretty cool. I see them going for 6.5k all the time.
The gold ceramic model is a yacht master cope, I’ll agree with that. I do think the rose gold yacht master is a sexy watch.

now i am become Cartier, destroyer of testosterone

now i am become Quartz, the destroyer of swiss

>>17732958
I really want to buy a Sneedmaster but I dislike the case shape too much
why cant they use the case of the 321 for the regular speedmasters?

now i am become Nomos, the destroyer of heterosexuality

now I am become Rolex, destroyer of pussy

now i am become Nomos, destroyer of...oh, wait, I already had those removed...

now i am become the Rolex AD, destroyer of self-respect

now i am become pool, the destroyer of sub 600m divers

>>17732994
>>17732996
I’ve never seen anyone say this. Weird how you guys make up these fake arguments. It’s the classic poorfag “A vs B” dilemma because you can’t afford to buy both.

>>17733067
Hi, welcome to 4channel. First, let me tell you about memes and shitposts.

>>17733076
>he knows it as 4channel
newfag

>>17733067
It's one autist who does 80% of the shitposting. You can tell by the file names, poorly constructed strawmen, and poor English.

Let's be honest, Omega deserves the hate it gets

>>17733119
The endless special editions are cringe but the core models are great. Rolex has cringe special editions too, but I still enjoy both brands.

>>17733119
oddly enough the worst thing I hate about that watch is the awful looking band, that has been used before.

>>17733119
*rapes you with pure horological prowess*

They're selling Duros with steel bracelets now

>>17732979
Why would you wear a field watchmwith a dress? That aside how is the movement?

>>17732982
Are you retarded? People who buy bronze do so for the patina that develops. Gold can't develop patina.

>>17733130
It's the 2020s anon, a tourbillon isn't a prowess. We're in the CAD-era ffs, there's pretty much no limits to mechanical horology now (especially if you consider there are people out there willing to spend millions over a single watch). FP Journe has been making his Chronomètre à Résonance for over 20 years now but "oh wow Omega is making a 200k tourbillon".
Even the chinks can make a fucking tourbillon.

>>17733007
>>17733015
How much do these two cost?

>>17733015
What's a Saudi prince's monthly salary?

>>17733015
How many 32XXs do you have sent to you for repair due to the loss in amplitude over time?

>>17733015
>172 diamond bracelet
I'd still put a neato strap-on it

>>17733150
Then why can't Rolex make one? Keep coping cuck.

>>17733160
Why would Rolex make a tourbillon?

It's actually insane how badly this mogs lolex and their dogshit Daytona movement. We're witnessing the end of Rolex.

>>17733160
Rolex hasn’t made an interesting watch since the YM2 and honestly they’ll probably never make an interesting watch again.

>>17733165
>3 days
Wow its fucking nothing. Lithium-ion > automatic

>>17733168
Mechanically it's something I guess but I don't know why they're bragging. 72 hours is pretty standard these days among high end mechanicals.

>>17733155
Not that many. Rolex owners generally don't check the amplitude of their movements. I'd be surprised if 1 in a 100 even knows what that is. They really only notice if the timekeeping is way off, like 30 seconds per day.

That said, when the movements are checked, basically half of all 32xx movements about a year old and every 32xx movement that's over two years old has the "problem".

The problem is real, but also overblown. The amplitude only tails off dramatically about 48 hours after a full wind.

We're instructed to tell buyers who ask about it that it's not a problem, it's an accepted part of the design.

>>17733179
>We're instructed to tell buyers who ask about it that it's not a problem, it's an accepted part of the design.
the absolute state of rolex cucks

>>17733176
It doesn't look like they're bragging. That's the back of the movement. They didn't put "3 days power reserve!!" on the dial. A power reserve indicator is not as useful if you don't know the maximum amount you have.

>>17733130
You know what would be really impressive?
Omega making a watch that's not 15mm thick.
Or a bracelet with micro-adjustment.

>>17733182
Fair enough. I mean they could've made a power indicator with three segments and let you do the rest.

>>17733188
>Or a bracelet with micro-adjustment.
You're getting your memes mixed up. Grand Seiko is the one without the microadjust. Omega can do that, at least.

>>17733179
Do you get the sense that Rolex truly doesn't think it's a problem, or is this damage control? Do you know if they're trying to fix it or resolve it with a new generation of movements?

>>17733188
I'll take the extra thickness if it means the movements actually work. Rolex, famous for their robustness and reliability, can't even make functioning movements. LMAO. Meanwhile Omega churns out god tier chronograph and tourbillons. Humiliating for Rolex fags.

I bought a tudor years ago just because the name "tudor" reminded me of an old yugioh gba game somehow.

>>17733194
(Good thing this forum is anonymous, otherwise I'd be out of a job.)

Yes, they're aware of it. Yes, they're trying to fix it.
But because it's not a problem that the vast majority of wearers will notice, it's not an out-of-control brushfire.

I don't know if you remember the datewheel issue that the Kenissi movement in the Tudor GMT had, but THAT was a problem. Very visible to anyone regardless of how much knowledge they had. That was a fucking disaster.

When the fix is implemented it will be treated as the next generation of movements. I don't see them calling it the 32xx EVO or anything like that.

>>17733193
The new Aqua Terra got an upgraded bracelet and it doesn't have micro adjustment. The watch is well over 7k.
Even Tudor's bracelets have micro-adjustment. Hell, I'm sure even Longines'.

>>17733014
>>17733019
>>17733024
>>17733027
>>17733030
>>17733036
>>17733038

>>17733207
Cartier doesn't have microadjust bracelets either. The only people who care about these things are the kind of people who use spreadsheets to make a decision.

>>17733202
Thanks for answering AD cuck. I'll choose to believe you're telling the truth

>>17733146
very cool

>>17733213
Yes, Cartier sucks at making sports watches. Thank you for bringing that out.

>>17733155
Very very few. idk who this other anon is.

>If you're looking for a good movement watch, look for Spring Drives.
>What do you mean quartz there's no quartz in Spring Dr- Oh
Kek that was good

>>17733179
What exactly is the problem? I bought my sub recently, should I just sell it now before normies catch on?

>>17733247
you should generally sell your Rolex right after walking out of the AD, its literally free money

>>17733247
Rolex has had some problems with their 32XX movements in 2018-2020. Maybe 5% of the watches were concerned. The problem has been long fixed but Omegacucks keep bringing that out because of the usual seethe.

>>17733260
source on problem being fixed?

>>17733247
>What exactly is the problem?
They're not sure but it seems to have something to do with what they did to increase the power reserve to 70 hours.
They made the mainspring longer and thinner and made the barrel thinner, among other changes.

>>17733247
>What exactly is the problem? I bought my sub recently, should I just sell it now before normies catch on?
You probably don't need to sell since you've still got plenty of time on the warranty and you've got a good chance that your movement isn't a dud.

When you start to have only a year or two left on the warranty...maybe think about putting it on eBay or something.

>>17733275
he made it up to damage control

In some pictures of the Royal Oak Jumbo it seems ugly. But in other pictures it seems to me the most beautiful watch ever made

>>17733282
The royal oak is always ugly

>>17733282
I think it's an exceptional piece of design but it doesn't look good on the wrist. Same as the Bulgari Octo Finissimo.

>>17732761
This is hell.
>>17732741
It's not a meme. It's a warning: you WILL regret it. That nanosecond's worth of extra time that it takes to register the time because of a lack of contrast WILL bother you. Mark my words non-believer. You wouldn't be the first to doubt and then regret afterwards.
This >>17732761 poster is a demon of frustration sowing the seeds of your future annoyance, don't fall for it.
Consider yourself warned. I've said all I can.

>every company is making integrated bracelet sport watches now
cringe

>>17733321
Anyone want to have a guess at how long this fad is going to go on for?
Another 2 years? 5? Surely not 10, right?
Has there been any analysis on how long watch trends last historically? Or are watchbloggers/vloggers and other such trash just shillers and faggots who do nothing else?

>>17733340
maybe 2-3, dive watches and minimalist field watches were a fad for that long

>>17733340
I think we're closer to the end than the beginning. Nautilus and RO fever has been steadily decreasing for a while now and that's what drives the copycats. It's worth noting that the iconic Royal Oak 15202 was replaced with the 16202 to pretty muted reception which may be a contributing factor in hype dying down.

>>17733015
what are the chances of getting a 2-tone gmt in under a year with no prior purchasing history?

>>17733146
I put a jubilee on mine and it suits bracelets well but alas I am a 6.25" wristlet and can barely wear most 40mms

for me, it’s the Grand Seiko SBGE271

>>17733340
The Nautilus and Royal Oak will remain in very high demand, because they're iconic and the production numbers are low.
I can see some integrated sports watches that are different enough still be relevant in the future (like the Moser Streamliner).
Obvious copes like the Piaget Polos S or the Girard Perregaux Laureato will be laughed at, and will sell for a couple of thousands in less than 5 years.

>>17733352
hahaha JUST

>every brand has 5 different models of diver watches
>this is fine
>a significant number of brands release one (1) integrated bracelet watch model each
>when will this fad end ffs

>>17733368
? i don't get it, but sounds unlikely

What watches are they wearing?

Thinking of getting this one in, feels like getting a diver on a regular steel is so boring

>>17732654
>>17732700
reference numbers?

>>17732827
why did they start doing the inverted lcd? its so bad for the legibility

cool watch otherwise
wish they made it in classic matte black

>>17733179
3135 supercase confirmed best modern Rolex

>>17733426

>>17733366
What about the Overseethe? That's also gone down in price hasn't it?

>>17733428
Now the Overseas is 222 cope.

>>17733413
6206-8040
6218-8971

>>17733282
in person it looks insane, but you need a very big wrist to pull it off. it kinda looks like bracelet first watch second, it's very unlike anything else really
too bad they are ridiculously overpriced and apparently have a fragile movements

Name a more annoying cunt than this idiot.
Pro-tip: you can't.

>>17733439
thanks
it feels like there are so many Seikos with this design but each has a different thing written on the dial its hard to keep track

What are the best watches with a ETA inside?

>>17733471
Pre-coaxial Omegas

>>17733474
Might agree... but what about current production stuff? Longines?

>>17733253
But I actually like the watch
>>17733260
If my “inferior Chinese” Omega outlives my Rolex I will laugh so fucking hard
>>17733276
Interesting, thank you. That’s kind of annoying for them to even do that. Who the fuck needs 70 hours of power? I literally sleep with the damn thing on.
>>17733278
Hmm, unfortunate. I bought this as a long term heirloom piece for my kids. If the movement craps out on me I’m gonna be pissed.

>>17733426
Is it dirty or do rolex have such poor glass clarity?

Best yellow dial watch beside the rolex OP and the tsuyosa?

>>17733482
>Who the fuck needs 70 hours of power?
The marketing department.

Power reserves are climbing because customers are being told by marketing to demand it.

A lot of it actually has to do with Omega. Back in the mid-90s when the GoldenEye era Seamaster Professional came out, it made the Submariner feel really cheap, especially the bracelet. So Rolex put some R&D money into improving their bracelets, clasps, endlinks, etc.

Omega has the coaxial escapement, so Rolex needs to market its own escapement, Chronergy (which is just an extremely minor massaging of the Swiss Lever). Customers don't know the ins and outs, but if they ask the Rolex salesmen if they have anything like Omega's coaxial, they better have an answer.

Omega's 8900 series movements have 60 hours of power reserve (and do so with a double-barrel mainspring) well, Rolex's 32XX need 70 hours. The problem is that getting that power reserve is tricky. They could lower the beat rate, like the PowerMatic movements. They could engineer a whole new movement like Omega did, or...they can simply make the mainspring longer and thinner, then fit it in the existing movement.

>>17733478
When the soimatic was introduced I think there was a handy dandy rule of thumb to determine which one had plastic parts and which didn't. I think the shitty variant of an already shitty caliber had fewer jewels, 23jewels? whereas the better version had 25 or something. I don't remember.
Are you looking for ETA only or are ETA clones ok too? The latter's list is quite extensive.

>>17733494
Dirty

>>17733496

>>17733496
Two watches come to mind when I think of yellow dials. I remember them not because of the quality or lack thereof of the actual watch, but rather because of the quality of the yellowness of the dials.
One's the vinrage Seiko Pogue(?) that's really popular for some reason so prices are likely fucky. Really nice metallic, golden wattle yellow. The other is the long discontinued Baume&Mercier Copeland diver, that had a really nice yellow dial that looked like honeycomb.
Like all B&M's it was likely shit and not worth the money, but I saw one of these in a jeweler's window 13years ago and still think of it when it comes to yellow.

>>17733511
>Copeland
They actually called a watch Copeland?

>>17733499
Look at Oris' mess of a calibre 400(?) I think it is. 5 days reserve. Wowie!
Only problem with something like that is that your hand movements over a normal ass sendentary day aren't going to wind that shit fully.
That was the least of their problems though. That whiole setting the time mess where the hands would jump when pushing the crown in making setting the precise time impossible on some examples, or the age old issue of long PR's where the accuracy goes to shit the less PR there is.
Goes to show that you should never be in that first round of buyers that companies experiment on.
Omega had that with the pre-8000 co-axials, rolex apparently with their 32xx.
What a shitfest.
Luckily for me I think Rolex design's have gone down the shitter and much prefer their older 31xx, non-maxicased watches. Smaller wrists means 5digit cases are better for me too lol

>>17733508
>>17733511
That Doxa looks so good in person, been thinking about getting it for a summer watch. Absolute sexo.

>>17733406
>1st gen

>1k for a solid gold rolex
>200 dollars for a GMT
And people still think rolex aren't massively overpriced.

>>17733522
>Only problem with something like that is that your hand movements over a normal ass sendentary day aren't going to wind that shit fully.
That’s why I like handwound watches

>>17733522
>maxicased

It’s supercase. Maxi refers to the dial.

>>17733528
As long as you don't mind over paying for a 100% chinese watch. Doxa was outed by a dive forum years ago as having their watches made by a chinese OEM manufacturer. When the forum tracked the OEM down those tards even had doxa watches in the background on their site as examples of their work. Doxa got that shit pulled fast lol
Treat doxa not as a veteran Swiss enthusiastic dive watch maker and rather as just other chinese microshitter. If you're happy paying such prices for their designs then you're good to go.

>>17733454
Nope I can’t
Also him and his friend give heavy fag vibes

>>17733544
Everyone knows this. It's old news.
It's still a nice-looking, yellow dial watch.

How to decide between black and white dials? I only wear plain shirts with blue jeans and boots.

>>17733544
To add, before this forum investigation happened I remember my bro in law having a hard on for doxa as all the old school divefags loved doxa and their ads littered the dive magazines he used to collect.
He told me that he wanted to buy one and since he has a holiday home in switzerland in the same city as the doxa "factory" he called them to ask if he could order and pick up his watch in person. He got a resounding "no way!". He got suspicious and just got a seadweller instead.
The forum guy's digging found that the "doxa factory" was literally a mailbox. Suddenly their reluctantance for in-person transactions made sense.
Dodgy as fuck.

>>17733539
Lol just print more money and increase wages then it will be affordable

>>17733547
>2grand for a chink micro-shitter
no thanks
you do you though

>>17733499
>Chronergy (which is just an extremely minor massaging of the Swiss Lever)
And it was based off of initial research on escapement geometry and friction done by an engineer at Seiko, Abe Kenji. His findings on geometry appear never to have made it to Seiko’s serially-produced movements (he did file a patent though) and later two guys from Rolex invented the Chronergy escapement based on his research.

>>17733561
fucking swiss thieving gypsy mountainjew niggers always trying to keep the yellow man down

>>17733544
To be fair that shit happens all the time with the "swiss made" legal denomination. They have the loosest laws regarding what can count as swiss made. You could import a finished product that's disassembled in 2 pieces. (Imagine a watch and the bracelet detached) mount the bracelet in switzerland and you can legally use the "Swiss Made" DON denomination.

is this the only solid metal digital lcd watch (so no smartass posts the lange) thats being made right now?

>>17733571
Casio makes titanium gshocks sometimes.

>>17733571
there are some all metal casios if im not mistaken

>>17733564
In their defense they were completely open about it and cited his work. It's a bit more complicated than just a copy, they did some more R&D on the matter and Chronergy is the end result.
https://watchesbysjx.com/2021/05/rolex-chronergy-analysis.html

>>17733574
>>17733575
do they have a good heavy dense feel to them?

I appreciate what Casio is doing but wish digital watches weren't just cheap disposable toys

>>17733591
idk i never held one. i have a couple of those made of plastic and they feel really really cheap. i feel like if i banged my hand against something it would break apart. their looks is far better than how they feel in hand. cant really blame them for it tho because they indeed are cheap

>>17733571
Casio A1000 is full steel

Why did Seiko stop making digital watches?

>>17733553
Back is more sporty in my opinion. You can wear either in just about any situation, but white will draw more attention, and look bigger to the eye.

>>17733308
Based legibility autíste preaching. Pic related.

>>17733591
>disposable toys
A gshock will survive more abuse than any mechanical/diver watch in existance.

>>17733640
Yes, and? They're still disposable toys. Not only that, but they advertise to the world that you are a poorfag incel.

>>17733649
>VGH, GLORIOVS INNACVRATE SOVL
>MECHANICALA LAST AS LONG AS THE GLORIOVS THIRD REICH
>VGH, DISGVSTING SCVPERIOR TECHNOLOGY
Please be trolling

>>17733655
It's very funny how poor and socially incompetent you are.

>MY GLORIOVS SEIKO SHITTER IS THE VLTIMATE TIMEPIECE
What in the unholy name of fuck are you on right now?

>>17733649
Do you know what disposable means?
>intended to be thrown away after use
Yeah, G-shocks are not disposable. Some models may be so cheap that you __could__ throw them away after use, but that's a different story.

>>17733670
Yeah, they're disposable garbage. As in I literally throw them in the garbage where they belong. You will never have sex.

>>17733670
Uhm actually metal springs are gears that wear down after a few years are more durable than a basic electrical circuit that lasts for decades. My AD told me this after I gave him his weekly blowjob, maybe one day I'll be able to have the honor of purchasing an air king!
>Verification not required.

Struck a nerve with the Casio incels huh? Once you graduate to a watch not intended for children I'm sure you'll meet a girl!

>>17733672
Hello fellow mechanicucks! How many cocks have you sucked? I'm up to 537! So honored to worship glorious mechanical timepieces!

>>17733672
Is a metal fork disposable? No
Can you afford to throw one away? Yes
There, fucking retard, it's about semantics. I don't even care about G-shocks. Also why are you so fixated on other anon's sex life?

>>17733684
Yes, it's disposable. As in I throw them in the garbage. They're trash. Literal trash made for children.

Imagine purchasing a battery operated plastic watch with a digital display as an adult. What went wrong in your life that made you never grow up?

>>17733689
Can't afford an apple watch? INCEL FAGGOT KYS, REPORTED TO THE FBI

>>17733687
You're unbelievably stupid. A plastic fork would be disposable. Writing "as in" doesn't allow you to redefine a word's meaning.

>>17733691
Apple watch
>well designed
Casio
>disposable dogshit made for poorfag thirdies who have never and will never have sex

>>17733696
Y so mad? Did a Casio fuck ur mom? LOLOLOL UR DAD IS A DIGITAL WATCH LMAO

>>17733701
Damn bro the incels are seething. I can't say I'm surprised, that's what no sex does to losers.

>>17733704
No he's actually right, I was the Casio. Why do you hate me son? I tried so hard but you never loved me like you love the AD's massive cock... what a shame.

>>17733674
>weekly blowjob
>not giving up that ass
This is why you'll never get one

>>17733706
Convincing stuff champ. You wear a child's toy. That's fine, just don't expect to be taken seriously by adults.

>They're still sperging out about jewelry
Ok I can't even troll anymore, I genuinely worry for your mental health. I hope your trolling too...

>>17733717
>actually reading posts on here and not just looking at the pictures

>>17733717
The difference is that my jewelry was made by a craftsman with the utmost care and carries with it hundreds of years of innovation and ingenuity. Yours came out of a Happy Meal.

>>17733723
The pictures are all shit. The only reason to come here is to stir up shit.

>>17733727
you need to be 18 to post here.

>>17733729
>is admitting to getting trolled by children

>>17733729
>you need to be 18 to post here.
Better ban all Casio posters then.

>>17733727
>The only reason to come here is to stir up shit
This general has some of the most shameless and blatant trolls I've ever seen. It's quite sad, because some posters are actually really nice and knowledgeable. I miss the threads on /g/

>>17733752
Really appreciate that they are all telling the same time. The casio looks sweet

>>17733759
>because some posters are actually really nice and knowledgeable.
Don't kid yourself, some of the knowledgeable posters are also trolls. Some days you want to talk about watches, other days, you just want to flex on poors and/or get Middle-class Eric seething.

>>17733406
please don't. there are a whole range of black citizens that are actually good watches (picrel just the first one that came up).

>>17733496
i think yellow dials look best in TV cases, pretty sure i've seen an omega like that but sometimes gold looks yellow in early colour film. pic semi related

Why nobody post THEIR watches anymore?

>>17733780
double posting for more pics, these things are kino

>>17733781
>post a nice watch
>fuck off rich retard
>nice fake
>can't afford a [next brand up the watch tier]
>post a cheap watch
>lol poorfag
Why would anyone? It's more fun to be on offense than it is to play defense.

>>17733781
Here u go

>>17733794
>NPC choice on a fat wrist.
Americans must be posting.

>>17733776
>flex on poors and/or get Middle-class Eric seething
You shouldn't kid yourself, you're not among the nice and knowledgeable anons I'm thinking of. They'd never write stuff like that

>>17733798
I never implied I was. I actually sold off all but one my watches a long time ago. I don't give a shit about these little trinkets.

>>17733781
I did, I posted
>>17732716
which is the replacement for my broken >picrel

>>17733781
here you go

>>17732914
keep my nigga Mahk's name out your fuckin mouth

was anyone else thinking of buying citizen nj0150 and tissot prx? what did you end up getting? how does the citizen look in person, something seems off in the pictures but cant really put my finger on it. maybe the bracelet seems too narrow or something

>>17733888
It is actually an integrated bracelet or just hooded lugs?

>>17733890
integrated

>>17733892
Bummer.

>>17733888
No lol we're not poor third worlders.

>>17733888
Yeah I'm in the same boat, I've been looking at both the NJ0150, a PRX, and the Eco Drive 365. Right now I'm leaning towards the NJ because of it's looks (just a simple, clean, professional watch).

>>17733898
i have a rolex and i almost bought tsuoysa but was turned off by no eco drive

>>17733781
My daily driver.

migu :DD

>>17733905
bah, I wish citizen would make something like this because I want eco drive. and they should make it atomic too.

>>17732826
Marathon 36mm diver

New bread:
>>17733995
>>17733995
>>17733995

NEW THREAD
>>17734056
>>17734056
>>17734056
>>17734056
>>17734056

>>17733649
People who talk like you are always virgins

>>17733425
dude it's fucking illegible outside of bright artifical light / sunlight. no glare at least. the light's pretty sick tho

>>17733002
it's temp since the one that came with it is super uncomfortable. idk I kinda like how smooth it is though