/fa/ - Fashion

consoooooooom

First for undisputed Omega supremacy.

>>17683365
Why people keep wearing watches on their right hand? Like, excuse me, are you uneducated sir?

>>17683372
I'm left-handed.

>>17683374
I came here to say this

>>17683365
My Hamilton gained 30 seconds in 7 days, is 4,3 s/d good for an 500€ automatic?

>>17683374
>>17683381
Imagine following the sinister path.

>>17683374
>>17683381
Is that an excuse? You are just signaling to everybody else how impolite and rude you are, not obeying basic laws of etiquette...

>>17683372
what if I wear it down

>>17683385
Yes.
COSC chronometer certification requires having at least within -4 or +6 seconds per day variance.

>>17683365
>Green dial edition

>>17683404
>that bracelet

>>17683404
Why would you post that?

Why are these threads always pure cringe

>>17683410
Seething, coping poorfags getting abused by rich chads

>>17683410
Lack of Rolex.

>>17683374
Me too, and I wear my watch on my left wrist because I'm not a retard.
Honestly, I'm surprised right-handed people don't wear theirs on their right wrist.

>>17683392
>Yes.
LMAO

>>17683412
Post more Rolex then.

>>17683411
>rich chads
A poorfag buying an expensive watch doesn't a rich chad make.

>>17683419
>why don't people wear their watch on the hand they use the most, increasing the risks of scratching it?

>>17683410
>Why are these threads always pure cringe

Poorfags seething at being poor.
Richfags seething because poorfags aren't kowtowing to them.

>>17683430
Why are you hugging walls? Are you a drunk?

>>17683424
Nah. I'm more of a "can't afford a Rolex?" kind of poster.

>>17683426
Poorfags can't afford expensive watches. It's really that simple. Cope all you want.

>>17683428
>LAME

>>17683435
You'd be surprised.

>>17683439
No, I don't think I would be. Show me the poorfags who are buying Patek or VC or AP.

>>17683385
that is exceptional considering that jlc that costs 10 times that gets 31 second every day

>they wear their watches on their wrists
Fucking amateurs.

>>17683385
Looks beautiful on that nato strap, damn.

Gentlemen, it is my honor to present to you the best watch ever made.

>>17683428
That kerning looks really weird

>>17683404
I like this more than the modern grand soiko models

>>17683482
It's a cool case shape that GS ignores for some reason.

>>17683442
>No, I don't think I would be. Show me the poorfags who are buying Patek or VC or AP.
I barely clear 500k per year before bonuses but that's why I stick to more mid-priced brands.
There are plenty of guys in my demographic who are buying watches they cannot afford.

>>17683500
Nice. I'm hoping to buy a 2714 too off a friend. How much did you get it for?

what are go-to citizen and seiko divers under 1000 these days? is seiko still king of quality for inexpensive watches? i heard they had some problems recently, like unaligned bezels etc

>>17683513
casio duro

I saw an internal (leaked) G-SHOCK magazine in Japan and there's two new MIP models. One's based on the 5600 and the other is based on the 6900. They've both got:

tough solar
MIP display
Bluetooth for time syncing

Both of these watch don't have any smart features (heart rate, step counter, etc) besides the time syncing and other features (alams, etc) with the app and they seem to be listening to the community. They are late 2023 releases. MSRP is 30,000 yen.

It's basically a solar square with MIP display, instead of atomic time syncing, it has been replaced with Bluetooth syncing.

Other things of interest were new colorways for BA001 and some of the other models like the Casioak, didn't see any solar BA001 variant. Maybe next year.

>>17683518
I second this. I have two duros and the seconds hand hits the indices perfectly.

>>17683525
>atomic time syncing, it has been replaced with Bluetooth syncing

>>17683500
>talking about poorfags
>your counter example is people who make $500k a year
What?

>>17683513
>>17683518
i dont want a casio, i want best citizen or seiko diver under 1000

>>17683534
depends on your wrist size

Was gonna get a Hamilton because it suited my everyday use case but went with islander day-t. This is my second automatic watch and coming off the aмфибиa, it's definitely an improvement.

Thoughts on a Santos style case for a 5600? I kind of want one.

>>17683536
>Hamilton
Bulova Hack is a million times better than the Khaki

>>17683511
>Nice. I'm hoping to buy a 2714 too off a friend. How much did you get it for?
2714 is the serial number. Breguet puts them on the dial.
The model is actually 5140BA/12/9W6.

I bought it new about 6 years ago. The list price was around 20k CAD, but Breguet ADs are usually pretty generous with discounts.

>>17683536
You should have gotten something bigger, we can still see your wrist.

>>17683537
I'm retarded

>>17683537
>>17683545
NGL, that looks lame as fuck.

>>17683538
True but this islander day-t has 100m of water resistance and sapphiric glass. And the lume is better

>>17683540
It's pretty comfy but... Am I actually naked?

>>17683535
6.6 inch

>>17683513
Citizen beats seiko which is a massive meme spread through internet parrotting. Shit accuracy, bad alignment QC, stuffing budget movements into a more expensive ranges of watches.
Either go Orient, or get one of the following certified dive watches
>citizen BN0150 eco-drive
Solar quartz so you wear it and forget about it for 15+years when the capacitor needs replacing
>citizen NY0040 Auto
Hardy auto diver. The newer variant with the updated movement has hacking and handwinding and the older versions only hand handwinding but have been found to hold better accuracy over time. Trade off.
Wear for 15+years when the movement finally starts to have issues and you either find a living watchmaker to service it or you buy s replacement movement to slot in.
Both ecodrive and mech are about $250+/-

>>17683550
Speaking of Citizen divers I'm really into the BN0000.

>>17683550
i like those, but dont like bracelet or rubber strap that they come on. i wonder if they would look good on zulu sailcloth or something similar

>>17683371
>>17683385
>>17683404
>>17683423
>>17683428
>>17683445
>>17683500
>>17683536
>>17683537
>>17683545
>>17683553
Can't afford a Rolex?
>Verification not required.

>>17683466
Thanks, I came on bracelet but I never used it

>>17683564
Why would you cum on bracelet, whether you used it or not?

>>17683558
I got a NY0040 black dial about 9yrs ago and ditched the stiff useless rubber strap for a black/white stripped zulu for a watersports seaside holiday.
It still keeps really good time. It's on a cheapie chinky rubber tropic. Mine's got the older more accurate calibre.
6.5" wrist, the 41.5mm case looks like 40.

>>17683513
NB6021 BTFO's seiko in every way
>Titanium
>41mm
>Boxed sapphire crystal
>Rated to -10 +20 SPD
>Anti magnetic
>QC that isn't dogshit
>Can regularly be found under $800

>>17683433
>tfw you have the cash but simply do not like the Rolex designs enough
I mean vintage datejusts/subs are pretty, but I can always get something better looking/more advanced/more interesting for less from most other brands
Also kind of lame to have the same watch as everyone, I got tired of seeing the Submariner design everywhere

>>17683212
I would too if I had a $50k watch lmfao retard.

Seiko jade Monster

Throwing some old random rubber straps on has reinvigorated my SNA411 appreciation. I'm a cheap quartz Seiko enjoyer and there's nothing anyone can do about it.

>>17683599
>jade
>blue

>>17683385
That's very good tbqh. Only auto I've got that competes is the Hamilton khaki day date at +2s to +4s a day, most other watches in that price range range -25s to +15s for me.

>>17683545
worst of both worlds

>>17683588
All seiko had to do was not be shit and they'd have reigned supreme in the lower end market. But no. Such a feat was beyond them.
>bad design choices
>misaligned shit when they were capable before and all chinkshit is more capable
>no sapphire anywhere when again, chinkshit has it at a lower price range stock
>reissuing vintage shit and then ruining it with crappy logos and weird proportions
>putting economy calibers in stuff like the King range
I cbf going on.

>>17683525
Thanks, everything you mentioned is a negative.

>>17683592
Consider the "alternative" route of comparable stuff that no one buys so you'll be the only one wearing it in sea of subs and DJ:
>Girard-Perregaux Laureato
>Glassütte Original SeaQ
>JLC Polaris
Or eschew sporty shit and wear a dressier watch with a leather band.

>>17683604
love the watch
neutral on that rubber strap

>>17683619
Definitely a function over form choice. The stock bracelet is standard budget Seiko garbage and never did like it on a NATO much. Leather was enjoyable but never felt like it matched the tough, cheap tool category the watch sits in.

>>17683614
>>Girard-Perregaux Laureato
Nautilus/RO cope
>>Glassütte Original SeaQ
Submariner cope from the ALS cope brand
>>JLC Polaris
dive watch with a pathetic 100m water resistance

>>17683598
That's poochange for him. He can afford to wear any modern watch but sticks to his banged up ap he bought for way less inflation adjusted.

>>17683631
Yes.
Now you know why everyone just wears rolex or ap.
Thanks for playing.

>>17683385
It's good, yeah. Speaking of accuracy i still haven't set my Weekdater and it's still accurate to within a minute, it's been a month now, i am very satisfied with its performance.

is anyone able to discourage me? this would be the most i had ever spent on a watch

>>17683644
I think it’s ugly and wouldn’t wear it. I’ve been down this road and collected a bunch of shitters when I could’ve just bought 1-3 nice watches instead. But that’s just me. If you like it, buy it.

>>17683644
Do you really like this watch or would you prefer something better that's currently out of reach?

>>17683644
If I were getting a blacked out tacticool watch I'd get momentums new sea quartz 30 variant

>>17683650
i really like it honestly. i need to look into the -/+ seconds lost per day. im a sucker for tacticool watches/gear and want an automatic

>>17683655
but its not radioactive, or automatic. would quartz actually be better in a practical sense? i know they are more accurate, but i dont want to have to change a battery every 2 years

>>17683660
It's solar, service interval of 6 years. It's more reliable than the traser in every sense. Momentum is one of the few brands that make solid watches ment to be used as tools.

>>17683668
i'll look into it. thank you

>>17683655
Marathon was not an option for you?

>>17683660
Tacticool and mechanical is not practical in a practical sense.
Quartz = fewer moving parts = less points of failure.
Solid state quartz like LCD g-shocks are the most durable because they don't have any moving parts. That's why in any image of actual soldiers today you'll see anywhere show them all wearing gshock/suunto/garmin.

Tacticool anything else is a larp. So don't get hung up on an automatic for it as it's a very shallow look and doesn't warrant the extra expense at all. A quartz traser? Fine, get it.
Next traser? Fucking why bother?

>>17683682
I'm biased because I'm a magnum PI fan but also marathons are huge an ugly. Value for money the momentum is unbeatable imo.

>>17683686
good point. i do already own a g shock 5610u. i will wait until my amphibia arrives before getting anything else.

>>17683682
the cool ones with the deep set dials are out of my price range, and i dont like the airman or whatever its called

>ANOTHER BLACK WATCHERINOO!!!!!!

>>17683536
It might be too big for you anon. Wouldn't have that problem if you just bought the 38mil hamilton.

>>17683385
My quartz Khaki is +2/+3s a month now. Souless accuracy.

>>17683700
Black dials make tool watches look like tool watches.
Colored dials make tool watches look like fashion watches.

>>17683709
Tool watches are quartz, anything else is a fashion watch anon.

>>17683718
You're not wrong, but I don't want my fashion watch to look like a fashion watch. I want it to look like a tool watch from the past.

>>17683709
Oh no no no, this >>17683718 anon mogged you so bad, non quartz cucks on suicidewatch.
>>17683721
>I don't want my fashion watch to look like a fashion watch
the absolute state...

>>17683656
If you really want it and it doesn't have some ridiculous -25/+40 accuracy then go for it and don't listen to anyone who's just bitching about matters of taste.

>>17683470
shit, from the thumbnail I thought that's an islander

>>17683735
Might as well be.

>>17683644
You know anon, I'm not gonna tell you that this watch will increase in value, or even hold its current value. The truth is, you bought it cuz you like it. It has value to you. That's what matters.

>>17683655
i love watches with orange hands

>>17683730
thank you anon. it has a eta-2824-2 so it runs between +/- 7 to +/-20 secs per day

>>17683777
If you're truly on the fence about spending the money then don't buy it for the number of days equal to its price/$100. If you still want it then go ahead cause then you'll more likely appreciate it longer.

Give it to me straight, just how bad is the Miyota 8215? This watch is exactly what I'm looking for, but it comes with that outdated movement. What do?

>>17683787
The main issue is the indirect driven seconds hand. It'll jitter so if that bothers you then don't get something with that movement.

>>17683787
Its a boring cheap old workhorse movement with some rotor noise iirc.
It's not bad per se, its just sort of the bare minimum, there are plenty of actually bad auto movements out there and the 8000 series isn't one of them.

>like the look of this watch
>figure it might not be total shit since it's usually Timex behind these Adidas watches
>look a bit more into it
>it's actually a Nixon
What do?

>>17683798
>It'll jitter
It can jitter, it's not a given that it actually will. I've had a 8215 for a decade and have never noticed this thing with my example that terminally online people bitch about because they've read about people on forums bitching about it in an endless cycle of not actually wearing watches but looking at pictures of them on reddit.

Should I cop?

>>17683770
orange is meh
strong red is better

>>17683812
I am no expert but it looks a bit overpolished to me. I could easily be wrong so...

at the bar for my bday, getting oysters later

>watch a Youtube video about a Reverso
>"did you know the Reverso was initially designed for polo players who..."
I KNOW THAT ALREADY STOP REPEATING THINGS OTHERS HAVE SAID A MILLION TIMES

>>17683808
Those nixon digitals are usually fine, if its not absurdly expensive go for it.

>>17683840
They do it to pad out their videos because they have nothing new or of actual substance to say. 99% if yt watch related channels are trash. I've seen better vids on singular watches from channels that have no watch slant.

>>17683843
It's only ~110€ so yeah, it's fine. Thanks anon!

>>17683844
This is why I only watch Watchbox reviews now.
Their videos are informative and go straight to the point. No e-celeb ego bullshit, no click-bait crap, no retarded take.

Are Citizen budget watches half decent? Or should I just stick with Timex?

>>17683852
>This is why I only watch Watchbox reviews now.
And you also know they're not """reviews""" they're just ads.

>>17683858
Citizen is better.

>>17683858
As long as you don't pay close to MSRP citizen all the way. Timex makes everything out of the cheapest most shitry materials possible, citizens are built well and durable, just sometimes boring

>>17683864
Even though they’re advertising the watches, they’re still by far the most useful reviews on the internet. Read Hodinkee lately? How about A Blog to Watch? It’s a complete joke. At least Tim knows what he is talking about. If you want his unfiltered opinion you should listen to his podcast where he freely shits on big brands.

Hey guys I wanted to get myself a new watch and decided it should be a panerai since Epstein wore those. Should I get a Submersible Mike Horn Edition or a regular Panerai 389

>>17683871
>If you want his unfiltered opinion
I really don't...

And what other panerai models do you recommend? I wanna try to stay under the 15k mark if possible

>>17683871
>At least Tim knows what he is talking about.

I'm honestly not convinced of that. He's just reading off a specs & features sheet while telling you a 47mm Panerai is suitable for a wrist as small as 13cm and, despite being 18mm thick, will easily slide underneath a dress cuff.

Ordinarily, that would bother me, but I know he's just shilling product, so I don't care. He has to lie to pay the bills. Then again, I don't watch him, either, as is my right.

>>17683852
I look at watchbox for a snippet about those specific watches but for actual horology related shit it's watchartsci.
I watch all youtube at x3 speed so his slow plodding boomer pace doesn't bother me.

>>17683840
There's nothing else to say, manufactured heritage is the raison d'etre of these watches

>>17683872
Get a homage or a fake like he did if you want to follow in his footsteps.
>>17683890
That's a lot of buzzwords that don't apply in this context.
If you were talking about ALS and others however, which is fake and gay, sure.

Looking for a watch like this but good.

The closest thing I found so far is a Hamilton khaki field in brown

>>17683852
>no retarded take
except for his estimation of minimum size wrist for watch in the video. they are not reviews but ads basically, so to not scare away potential customers he is full of bull shit
>this 44mm royal oak offshore chronograph has lug to lug of 53 mm, but if you include the very edge its more like 57mm
>the watch is fairly thin measuring just north of 16mm and easily slides under the sleeve
>this watch would suit wrist from 13 to 27mm of circumference
>i wouldnt wear it on less than 12.5

>>17683910
That's the other anon's point. Because you know he's coming from a place of trying to sell the watch you can ignore that shit.

Basically, just mute the sound on his videos and enjoy pictures of watches in silence.

>>17683872
of those two, i would go with regular panerai 389. i would go with pic related over either of them and if i was really rich like him, i would buy 20 vacherons so they can make me a special 1 of 1

>>17683914
i agree, aside from that he is very useful. it takes him 2 minutes to tell you everything about the watch so you dont have to google it yourself, plus you get to see how the "real" watch looks like, on and off the wrist, instead of those horrendous renders that look nothing alike

>>17683700
contrast

>>17683908
Here's one poorfag and one richfag option
https://www.boldrsupply.co/collections/boldr-venture/products/venture-wayfarer-khaki
https://www.bremont.com/products/mbii-savanna

New watch

>>17683633
Ok?

>>17683839
Thats a nice watch anon, I personally like the oyster bracelet but the jubilee is quite comfortable

>>17683934
tradinton tardi hehehah

>>17683946
hehehahahaehehe

>>17683915
>i would buy 20 vacherons so they can make me a special 1 of 1
Is that what it takes to be able to use their bespoke service?
Surely it's not that simple.
Buying 20 of those fiftysix shitters is meaningless. 20 grand complications on the other hand.

>>17683500
what do you do for work?

>>17683952
idk the details, but they do offer 1 of 1 if you buy bunch of regular ones and they deem you worthy. i can imagine sweating going on in vc management when the story of him being rapist pedophile broke out. they are most likely the ones behind the story of him buying fake watches
i just wish for that watch to surface and for someone to prove it is genuine just to see the shitstorm

>>17683934
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDVtMYqUAyw

>>17683961
Lol it's not the automatic but yes

Jeffrey anon here I’ve looked at my Epstein folder and found this pic again, he seems to be wearing something akin to a VC but I’m not sure, anyone got an idea what that is?

>>17683972
It's a fake vc

>>17683972
you have to be a role model citizen and vacheron customer for years before they will make you special 1 of 1 model like that. dont believe stories about a fake. thats the same as hugo boss or porsche trying to distance themselves from hitler

>>17683926
appreciate the suggestions

>>17683957
>what do you do for work?
The single most depressing job on earth: pediatric oncology.

On the bright side, literally no one ever asks me "How's work?"

>>17683985
Yeah must be so depressing to get wild amounts of money that none of your patients will ever see in their lives just so you can lord over them and act like a haughty prick before you let them die anyway.

>>17683976
I’m sure Jeffrey epstein never bought any fakes, the Hitler analogy seems very fitting.

Is this the hottest general on /fa/?

>>17683934
A pilot watch? Where are you flying?

>>17683987
I'm laughing because you're not a serious person.

For the benefit of the thread, most of my income comes from therapeutic research and teaching. (If your doctor, in any field, isn't a teacher, get a better doctor. Pro tip.)

But my patients' survival rate is better than you'd think. Children are much more resilient than old Boomers. They're also way more optimistic. Most of my colleagues and I draw strength from the determination of our patients.
>Little Timmy says his pee-wee hockey season starts in a couple of months so...well, I guess we have to get him fit to skate by then.

>>17683987
>being angry at someone who treats cancer kids just because they have more money than your unemployed ass...

>>17683991
>get a better doctor
Thanks you gonna pay for it or?

>>17683997
"Doctors" are literally dog vomit with god complexes, 99% of them don't do shit except google your symptoms and fuck nurses. And they are all psychopaths.

>>17683365
glad i got my t200 while they were so cheap a while back. love this thing.

>>17683999
>>17683998
>those timestamps

>>17683972
there is a more affordable option for epsteinmaxxers...

New 70th anniv Seamaster, 41mm

Might be an AT release with it too

>>17684023
>wow, it's fucking nothing.jpeg

>>17684023
So same shit as every other one except let me guess 2 times more expensive?

>>17683990
You're trying to make a joke but I am actually a pilot lol, I fly helicopters. If you're an American taxpayer then you pay me to fly, thank you for your money.

>>17684023
SMP300 needs a redesign, it is not aging well.

>>17684029
ever flown aw 139?

>>17684032
Nope, that would be neat. The only leonardo helicopter that the us flies is used for training as far as I know. The navy just adopted it, and despite it having some teething issues I've been told it handles and flies excellent.

>>17684007
I thought I was the only epsteinmaxxer

>>17683866
>>17683867
Thanks! I will be looking at more Citizen stuff now.

>>17683958
>i can imagine sweating going on in vc management when the story of him being rapist pedophile broke out. they are most likely the ones behind the story of him buying fake watches
That's not a story. The vacheron in that pic is 100% fake and gay, same with the harvard hoodie since he never attended it. He was a shyster to the core.

>>17684036
you are
because there's only one samefag bringing this pedokike up every thread for the past few months

>>17683943
thanks, jubilee is comfortable and prefer DJ on them

>>17684056
what year is your DJ? how much?

>>17683406
it's "period" you uncultured rube

>>17683588
Fuck you now I've got the urge to buy another shitter (the citizen)

>>17684028
>>17684029
Nice timestamps.

>>17683872
Panerai are nwbig

>>17684087
Not worth buying in gen ? Idk man I don’t think there’s reps out there that are as good as the real thing

>>17684063
it's a 1603, silver linen dial. from mid sixties. I paid $5k for mine with original box and in very good condition. you can get them cheaper but if you buy I recommend seeking out one in great condition from a good dealer. vintage ones often have shitty bracelets so worth being picky imo.

Decided on picking a 5 digit submariner as my first Rolex. Would you rather get the no date 14060M or the date 16610?

>>17684106
Nice ty. I want a Rolex but don’t like the modern iterations. Some of the older Air Kings look subtle and clean which I like. Are those to be avoided for any reason?

>>17684112
Yuck
Rolex is.so fucking boring...

>>17684112
The bracelets on these are pure shit.

>>17684112
dont like the zoom shit on the rolex dates tbqh

>>17684112
If no date,
14060/m vs 124270 new exp1?

>>17684112
dont know much about rolex. one of the things i know is they put a wall of text on their dials. therefore right looks fake and cheap bc no cyclops

>>17684126
14060M, easy. Nu-Rolex is soulless.

>Finally make enough to purchase a VC
>Always end up going back to wearing my Dad's old rolex that was given to me years ago.
Anyone else end up doing the same thing? It's a weird feeling.

>>17684113
Gosling wore one at the academy awards once. the most important thing is condition. if you buy vintage be very selective about the condition it's in.

what would the lifespan be on these lcds? they already look faded in pics
>>17684138
what is it you like about VC? watches ultimately come down to emotions so i doubt anything will supplant the rolex

>>17683604
>>17683629

THE NUMBERS MASON WHAT DO THEY MEAN

Fashion bezels, subdials, tachimeters are cringe.

>Uuuuuh i use my chronometer to time the races duuuuh

>>17684143
pls help i want a nofap mission timer

>>17684148
Well just get that one then?

>>17684143
no reason why omega wouldn’t be able to replace it for you with a service overhaul if its faded. the gen 1 x33 is like 25 years old now, so it’s expected some would be fading by now.

>>17684147
100% agree, get ready for LARPers to come out of the woodwork
>MUH EGGS (from McDonald's)
>MUH GRILL (microwave)
>MUH EVROPA TRADLIFE (basement dweller)

>>17684148
A speedy goes 12 hours which should be more than plenty for you

>>17684161
my mom says if i go 5 days she'll buy me a tudor

>>17684157
The fact that you cannot conceive the possibility of someone cooking their own eggs or using a grill is WILD

I’m trying to imagine what your life is like an I’m losing my MIND nigga

>>17684165
Weird, she told me that also, I don't think she meant the same thing

What’s a good rectangle case with 20mm band width?

Also thoughts on the Tudor 1926?

>>17684188
>What’s a good rectangle case with 20mm band width?
There aren't any
>Also thoughts on the Tudor 1926?
The 36mm one is pretty great

does anyone know if citizen made a solar of this with the bracelet?

Behold... the new 37mm promaster diver from shitizen. What do we think of it?

>>17684143
>what would the lifespan be on these lcds?
LCD watches from the 70s are still working perfectly. You can buy vintage LCD watches that are over 40 years old without issues.
>they already look faded in pics
Because it's seen from the side. There is an angle where LCD looks their clearest and they usually make it anywhere between straight on (90 degrees) to somewhere bellow it. That is the angle you most often look at a watch on your wrist.

>>17684030
It looks like a watch from 2002

One of you fags recommended I go here.

I don't speak Japanese or know anything about vintage watches, so I'm working up the resolve to go in.

>>17684327
just walk in, point at a watch and use your most racist accent. Watch that noodle scene from blade runner first and practice that

>>17683385
Yes, in fact it's lower than your usual automatic.
Automatics are lame as shit while my beautiful solar seiko only loses 1 second a month.

>>17684327
i bought a camera in japan and it was a great experience

>>17684297
All the wristlets must be creaming their pants, and here I am, contemplating a Momentum Deep 6 Mk II that's 47mm

Voila. The Momentum Deep 6

>>17684135
>Nu-Rolex is soulless.
What do you mean?

Stop me from buying that microshitter

They had one shelf of watches and nothing caught my eye

I want a kanji day/date

>>17684340
I see a nice penis quartz there

>>17684340
This one's really nice, where every single second index is applied.

>>17684349
damn

sneedy or explorer for daily wear?

>>17684327
CHING CHONG CHICITI CHINA
NI HAO


Just bring in a phone quick translator, smile and point at stuff

Take pictures of some vintage speedies m8

>>17684379
speedy for me, on a nylon strap

>>17684297
The designers fucked up, and instead of making the bezel thinner, the bezel-to-dial ratio of the Submariner was used which looks terrible on <38mm dive watches. An example of a well-executed small watch with a rotating bezel is a vintage Turn-O-Graph. Notice the thin bezel.

>>17684023
New anniv AT too, 41mm...
SEXOOOo

>>17684340
Fucking hell all those look awesome. What's the one with small seconds to the top right?

>>17684379
sneedy bro

I found some more watches

>>17684410
>>17684414
Wow. Wish I could live in Japan, this is incredible that they consider this normal watches to wear.

>>17684418
Brown dial one looks almost good, ruined by the open heart cutout with blue shit around it.

>>17684417
>No. 2
What's that mean?

>>17684340
>>17684410
>>17684414
>>17684415
>>17684417
>>17684418
>So many shitters.
No wonder the SWISS are better.

>>17684447
That's all I could think of too lol, it looks nice but...... just a bunch of cheap watches

>>17684449
it's a junk shop for used goods what do you expect?
people don't throw out decent things

>>17684460
Are Japs so poor that they actually wear that or what? I saw some documentaries and it seems they actually work for $1k/month forever like delivering shit to actual rich people, there are 50 year old losers carrying food lmfao is this really how it is?

>>17683374
I don’t like the crown digging into my hand so I wear it on my right hand. I also wear [mens] bracelets on my left wrist so it would be way too busy

>>17684461
i think wages in japan have been frozen since the mid 90's, not accounting for inflation and changing tech and demographics
they're incredibly inefficient when it comes to non-technical work

>>17684327
It was me lel you actually went there

>>17684340
WTF 17000 yen (a bit over 100€) for a 61GS?

>>17684449
Ask them for other vintage watch shops, i'm sure they'll be able to help you out. Also can you please buy me that 61GS?

>>17684470
Thank you Anon, I love you

>>17683839
White face w/ flute oyster looks so feminine

>>17684476
A small delicate watch looks cool and incredibly stylish if you're a very masculine man.

>>17684487
>editors note: he meant just fucking lift some weight u fat fuck

>>17684487
>pic unrelated

>>17683985
>The single most depressing job on earth: pediatric oncology.
Unironically wouldn't do it for 500k/y. You could totally get a top of the line watch with that income though, cool VC's aren't even that expensive for being in the same percieved tier as Patek and AP

Anyone happen to know what watch Columbo's wearing here?

Identify please, is this a JLC?

51 people got together and made this watch. They've done a pretty good job i'd say. Could /wt/ get together and make a watch?

>>17684546
51 people and it still has a cut numeral lmfao

>>17684550
It was made specifically and exclusively to enrage people like you.

>>17684546
>Could /wt/ get together and make a watch?

I think 3 people could comfortably handle running a (((microbrand))) one guy makes it in CAD, the other guy manages the aesthetic "Just rip off a submariner", third guy calls the chinese sweatshops to outsource literally everythign

>we got a seagull movement
>ripped off a known watch desgn
>made the case in china
>vegan leather band
>we (((MADE))) this

Fuck straight off, the western counries are post industrial, you don't make ANYTHING.

>>17684546
>Could /wt/ get together and make a watch?
has to have
>1200m WR so we can swim with it
>gmt hand because everyone here is world traveler
>best lume in the world because nobody ever looks at their watch unless its pitch black
>chronograph
>chronometre specifications
>manual wind, hacking
>annual calendar at least
>96 hour power reserve
>no more than 12mm thick
>less than 40mm so the wristlet bros can wear it too
>more than 36mm so the gigachad bro who gives daily reminder that 36mm is womens watch can weae it as well
i wonder how that monstrosity would look like

>>17684546
>lyrique
lol
it's like those chink brands that use random frenchy names

>>17684556
you forgot digital complication

>>17684555
>the other guy manages the aesthetic
>"Just rip off a submariner"
>vegan leather band
LMAO
you forgot another guy to make cringy website, make up history / inspiration story and bribe some e-twerps like teddybaldasshair to shill it up

>>17684556
Behold the Ultimate Watch! A treasure from a watch general of yore!

>>17684555
>make
Alright, design and produce.

>>17684562
This looks surprisingly ok, i remember once we tried designing the ugliest watch and boy was it ugly.

>>17684562
The digital date is a cool idea, strange i haven't seen it anywhere else yet.

>>17684560
>you forgot another guy to make cringy website, make up history / inspiration story and bribe some e-twerps like teddybaldasshair to shill it up
We wouldn't sell it, a watch by us for us.

>>17684562
Didn't H Moser already do this schtick better and with more originality?

>>17684571
Yeah and they physically made the watch.

>>17684501
>one less ruined dinner/flight/movie every time one of your patients dies
>$500k a year.+ tip
Sounds like a dream job

>>17684579
Don't cut yourself on that edge, kiddo.

>>17684546
>>17684556

Would you buy my watch?

>Green dial edition

>>17684003
Yesyes however

>>17684586
Give me money retard. If you have it so hard surely you want to save other people's lives?

>>17684586
why haven't you grown out of this place

>>17684586
THIS, so much this!!! I wish I could upvote this more than once!!!

>>17684594
>>17684597
seething poor

>>17684552
if that's what floats the boats of those 51 retards, then they may rejoice
the real /wt/ has had at least a single more or less finished design that could have been produced by vostok, but something fell through
this piece of shit is a bad ripoff of a double-microshitter that's a ripoff of a chrono bleu
>case by voutilainen
>plainshit dial
lol
LMAO

>>17684594
go earn some yourself, shitskin
or are you as worthless as everyone in your life claimed you to be? grim

>>17683999
Generally depends on if they are just doing a job for the money or actually care for the patients.
e.g.
>many years ago, grandpa has cancer (eventually dies doe to other chronic illness), our chaotic but actually caring doc uses experimental treatment (using cheap thalidomide based on then very new research, now sold at high price with new patent),
>scheduled radiation-appointment, radiologist only pissed there is nothing to radiate, doesn't care about the stuff being mostly gone.

Some are interested in cures, some only care for payment for treatments.

>>17684606
most doctors in the US at least only care about the monies. and I don't really blame them for it considering you can't become a doctor unless either your dad is bezos or you take on $500k in debt at high interest rates

not saying no one needs doctors but for 99% of doctor visits you're better off just going online and ordering the pills from a sketchy overseas pharmacy and paying with bitcoin, you can order just about anything that isn't amphetamines or opioids nowadays, oh and speaking of opioids, yet another example of why the medical profession is a disgrace

>>17684147
>>17684157
I do actually get a lot of use out of the bezel and chrono, believe it or not.
>Provide equipment to sensitive government/naval/military customers
>Provide training, testing and startup services
>Equipment often in sensitive areas where you are not allowed to even have a phone
>Often have to convert volumetric units in the field as there are a mix of units of measurements depending on the source of the auxiliary equipment or related processes
>Have to precisely time process in the field as part of startup/commissioning process and reporting
>Have a watch that allows me to do all of that quickly and efficiently

>>17684157
>nobody cooks and if they do they might as well be claiming to triple backflip into their lamborghini
yep I'm on 4chan, let me guess no one has sex either

i use my moonwatch to time how long i last during a goon session at full blast

>>17684608
>most doctors in the US at least only care about the monies.
Proof or just your headcanon?

>>17684612
you can lie to your friends and family, you can lie to yourself, but most aren't fooled

>>17684613
So no proof at all. Got it.
I figured you'd have had the results of a survey or something, anything.

If you're a Burger, the party you should be blaming is your absurd for-profit health insurance scheme, not the doctors.

>>17684611
if you don't have the x33 (1000 day mission timer) you must be an amateur

>>17684614
which is why I said
>and I don't really blame them for it considering
"the system" may be why you're a disgrace, but you're still a disgrace

>>17684618
Why don't you get a job?
The unemployment rate is historically low and wages are rising. There's millions of openings.

Then you wouldn't have to seethe so hard at other people having money.

>>17684620
oh I see you're just a projecting simp, a stealth wealth (so stealthy not even your bank can see it)

I hope doctors see this bro!

>>17684622
>doesn't answer the question
>tried instead to deflect
Why don't you get a job?
The unemployment rate is historically low and wages are rising. There's millions of openings.

Then you wouldn't have to seethe so hard at other people having money.

>>17684609
>often in sensitive areas where you are not allowed to even have a phone
>Have to precisely time process in the field as part of startup/commissioning process and reporting

I got myself a casio for working in the airport, the watch has so little metal in it doesn't beep in the detector frame so i don't have to take it off each time and has a timer, a stopwatch and an alarm.

>Often have to convert volumetric units in the field as there are a mix of units of measurements depending on the source of the auxiliary equipment or related processes

Remember these?
I'd get myself one of these.

>>17684608
>He doesn't do concierge medicine
It's basically a club. You have a monthly/annual fee, but you get real personal attention and care from a doctor that actual knows and respects you, and vice versa. Last time I needed to go, we spent 20 minutes just shooting the shit before getting into the medical issue at-hand. Like the old days of having a doctor who gives a shit and is personable. They also get you in to see specialists immediately. Last time I needed a scan, he sent me to the place, there are dozens of people waiting in the lobby looking mad, I get called back to be scanned before I can even finish filling out the paperwork. It's the only way to do medicine in 2023 unless you like being treated like cattle by a doctor who doesn't have the time to get to know you are talk to you, even if he wanted to.

>>17684623
if you want to be a doctor you have to go to medical school, simp-kun. simping for the sackler family doesn't pay unless you can drive up their sales numbers

>>17684627
>still desperately, pathetically trying to change the subject
Why don't you get a job?
The unemployment rate is historically low and wages are rising. There's millions of openings.

Then you wouldn't have to seethe so hard at other people having money.

>>17684624
The watch does everything I need it to without having to stuff a calculator in my pocket and spend 20 minutes letting high level security inspect and authorize it.

>>17684629
damm this is a shit bot, a script kiddie copy/pasting python could do better

>>17684626
He can't do concierge medicine. That requires being able to afford it. Medicaid is his only option.

>>17684632
I accept your concession.

>>17684634
but hey at least it can do a for loop

>>17684630
Then you're actually based.
Except nobody knows and just assume you're cringe at a glance.

>>17684639
It's /wt/, if I started giving a real shit about what anon thinks I would probably just suck start my carry gun.

>>17684126
I went through this decision and went with 124270. In person the 14060's hollow end links and differing width of the bezel insert compared to the 16610 stuck out a lot more, looked/felt cheap.

The 16610 looks way better, but I wanted a no-date.

>>17684645
That's a nice San Martin homage.

>>17684645
nice watch. the only thing i don't like is the ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX around the rim

>>17684645
Not sure if that's actually good looking or the it's just that Rolex logo has me horny af

new thread
>>17684650
new thread
>>17684650
new thread
>>17684650
new thread
>>17684650
new thread
>>17684650

>>17684647
I asked the question and visited a boutique a few hours ago. You don't notice it unless you're lookimg for it. Way more apparent in photos.
Tried the 36 and the new 40.