/fa/ - Fashion

That is the stupidest watch ever.

I just want a Timetron.

I just want an SKX with a high accuracy, perpetual calendar quartz movement.

>>17539124
lots of nice Soviet era watches. see here: >>17537569
especially notable are the 2209 movement dress watches, which are very thin and rather common
other notable watches include:
>Raketa 24 hours watch (originally designed for a polar expedition so that they could tell if it's day or night)
>Raketa Calendar (interesting calendar complication for cheap)
>Raketa Big Zero (beware of fakes / redials)
>Raketa Copernicus
>Elektronika vintage digital watches
>Kirovskie Crab (someone posted one ITT)
>Volna watches with interesting dials (these are sometimes faked)
>Sputnik (the seconds hand shows the Soviet sputnik satelite orbiting around the earth. often faked)
>Luch One Hand

>>17539152
Are there any watches that are more expensive than this that are worth buying? Other tham meme investment watches like rolex etc.

>>17539175
Yes

>>17539168
based i'll check these out

>>17539178
Such as?

Reminder,
Having a nice watch is completely pointless if you're fat. Anyone close enough to be able to see that your watch is nice isn't going to be thinking
>Nice watch
they'll be thinking
>Oh God, he smells like shit. He's so fat he can't wipe his own ass.

>>17539206
SO hot

>>17539182
Yes

>retard thinks he's hot shit cause his watch
>actually wealthy anon appears with cuff links that cost as much as his shitty watch
>assblasted retard KEEPS GOING full mental breakdown for many more AND MORE threads

>>17539215
>he's still responding to obvious bait!

><$300
>anything but dress or diver
>automatic
>36mm to 40mm

any recommendations?

>>17539215
Well, he's not wrong, though. Fat people DO smell like shit.

Can you refute anon's post on its merits?

>>17539229
Orient has a classic looking automatic field/pilot's watch that's as low as $240 at various places online

>>17539248
That's not the point. >>17539215 poster's entire psychological well-being relies on the narrative that some guy is triggered by a picture of expensive cufflinks ripped from a website along with a claim that an anon owns them.
If that's not the case, then...well, the future doesn't look too bright for this fellow who's never posted a picture of his own watch.

Good evening, /wt/.
Post some wrist shots. I'm sick of talking about fat people.

>NOOO DON'T POLISH YOUR WATCH IT ADDS HECKIN CHARACTER SCRATCHES AND DAMAGE ARE GOOD
Just makes it look like you're too poor to afford cosmetic servicing costs LOL

This but smaller? Suggestions?

>>17539309
What kind of dumb retarded chrysler car are you driving with a navigation system and 2 fake gauges on the a-pillar?

What are your thoughts on these brands:

>Delka
>Jowissa
>Breil
>Delma
>Catorex
>D1 Milano

>>17539229
39.4mm, just under the wire, and only $220

>>17539332
Literally who?

>>17539332
What are your thoughts on these brands:

>Notengo Dinero
>A. Yahuasca
>C. H. Ipotle
>Timothy Thumb
>Quazaaq
>Aiselles

>>17539345
>>17539335
Catorex is the oldest Swiss brand still owned by the same family.
Jowissa, Delma, and Breil are also Swiss brands that are family owned.
D1 Milano is a pretty well known Micro
Dekla is a German brand that sources everything from Germany (instead of parts from China like most German brands)

Just some not so well known brands. I guess they are too niche

>>17539332
not rolex

looking for a watch cheap as possible that's like pic related

I forgot how watch sizes work but I wrote this down last time
>7.5inch/19cm - 39mm to 42mm
buying in aus

>>17539309

>>17539483
Casio or Swatch

>>17539483
Just get the Timex. It would be more helpful knowing your budget

>>17539494
like under $150 aud preferably
timex one is sold out

>>17539309

>>17539483
You may want to shop around on eBay to see what you can get preowned. Might be hard to find something nice at this price range.

>>17539309
Doesn't anyone here have watches?

>>17539507
>>17539494
>>17539492
i am looking at Casio MTP-1302D
will it fit my wrist need something "7.5inch/19cm - 39mm to 42mm"

>>17539521
Definitely

>>17539533
what about this one
is it not exactly the same watch but with I, II etc. instead of normal numbers

>>17539516
you use that nasa strap for every day use? seems excessive like you're wearing a cuff bracelet

>>17539152
I've worn my 36mm timex expedition watch a lot because it is extremely comfortable, but find myself gravitating toward my Casio WV58A-1AVCR because it is extremely accurate using radio time synchronization. This leads me to wonder if my dream watch exists.

A field watch or similar classic looking watch that: uses a quartz movement, is small (36mm would be ideal but 40mm max), is solar powered, has some kind of radio/GPS time synchronization, is titanium or at least stainless.
My budget is $500.

At the moment I'm looking at the Casio LCW-M300D-1AJF for around $180, but I think the LCD is ugly and hopefully I can get a watch under 43mm. There are some Citizen Eco-Drive models that fit what I want, but ~$450 seems like too much money a quartz watch and 40mm is still a bit larger than what I want. Also most of the citizen eco drive watches that have radio control are covered in tacticool dials that look ugly.

Which one should I buy?
>inb4 get a six digits
I don't like maxicase
>inb4 get a Pepsi
I don't like it
>inb4 get a JLC/GS/Omega/Invicta
no

>>17539662
this is so sad

>>17539643
Fuck, are you me?

Titanium - solar quartz - black or grey no random colors - ideally field style

>>17539671
Can't afford a Rolex?

>>17539662
I'd just get a datejust personally, the submariner design is so widely copied that it doesn't feel special to me anymore. literally most divers on the market clone it in some way

>>17539162
where2cop?

>>17539683
You can buy JL sneeds that cost the same as that

>>17539567
I like this one better

>>17539694
You can buy a lot of stuff that costs the same as those, but none of them say Rolex on the dial and that's what anon wants.

>>17539712
could just buy a JLC and a 50$ chinese rep lol

>>17539712
Any social situation where a pack of rubes would be impressed by a Rolex, it is at risk of being stolen. If you are insulated from peasants enough to daily a Rolex, any respectable brand would garner the same reaction.

>>17539682
If you aren't as set on the idea of radio sync as I am, it looks like there are 37mm Eco Drive watches that look pretty good in "super titanium".

>>17539502
my god anon, what fucked up hobby or job do you have that requires this

>>17539750
international assassin / underwater welder

I'm a fucking noob and am considering getting a steeldive SD1970 as a first automatic in the aliexpress sale. its not a dream watch but it's probably at the sweet spot of practical and cheap. Please tell me why I'm an idiot who makes bad choices.

>>17539768
Buy the SD1974, it has a steel chapter ring. I have the gen2 sd1970, the plastic chapter ring looks really cheap

>>17539662
Sub.
But get the later SEL/rehaut one.

>>17539725
Not really, they all have random red or blue elements, or busy dials.

I only really like BN0118 and PMD56-2952 and they're both close to 500 euro which feels stupid to pay when the other ones cost under half that.

>>17539694
>for the same price as a Rolex you can get a watch that looks like shit and doesn't hold its value
Yeah I'm gonna pass

>>17539815
>doesn't hold its value
if this is a concern for you, you cant actually afford it

>>17539822
>y-you can't actually afford it okay???!!!
>w-why won't you buy that JLC that I like?? This is my dream watch REEEEEEEE
>I HATE ROLEX I HATE ROLEX I HATE ROLEX I HATE ROLEX
lmao this makes me want a Rolex even more.
Crazy how a brand can make people seethe so much.

>>17539815
>you can get a watch that looks like shit
>JLC only makes one watch

>>17539662
These are all so ugly and boring. Do you really think these used 4k shitters are anything but NPC fodder for babby's first "luxury" watch?

>>17539662
Thoughts?
It is my everyday watch and works like a charm.

>>17539841
Why you defending JLC so hard, though?

>>17539858
I'm not defending JLC, I'm making fun of your pea brain

>>17539841
The Polaris, the only sports watch from JLC, is absolutely terrible.

>>17539865
It is quite horrid but at least they still make nice dressier watches

>>17539860
So I'm a peabrain for not wanting to buy the watch you like?

>>17539870
No for saying stupid things

>>17539867
>It is quite horrid but at least they still make nice dressier watches
They really don't. Their designs are stale and bland. Their movements are interesting but that's literally all the appeal of the brand.

>>17539662
I'm personally a big fan of the GMT so GMT Master or Explorer is what I'd pick personally.

What's cool about the 16710 GMT is you can buy extra bezels and you're able to swap them out yourself if you're comfortable doing so. This means you could get a Pepsi/Coke/All-Black bezel and swap between when you feel like a change. The black bezel GMT essentially gives you the Sub but with an extra very useful complication

>>17539872
Your opinion of course but I really like pic related and the Reverso

>>17539871
>No for saying stupid things
Stupid things like "I don't like JLC".
Got it.

>>17539846
>everyone get a load of this guy wearing a charm bracelet
Its an ugly watch.

>>17539879
Things like saying they only have one design, sure

>>17539880
Just curious.
In what specific way is that watch ugly?

Is it okay to get a San Martin that has good reviews if it's my ideal watch in terms of looks? (I prefer it to the thing that it's homaging)

>>17539882
>Things like saying they only have one design, sure
Where was that ever stated or implied? No one said they all look the same. They all look ugly.

>>17539893
Same thing in effect

>>17539893
Bit of a harsh generalisation for any watch brand desu

>>17539890
does your mummy still wipe your ass? grow a spine you goddamn eunuch
if you like it, buy it, retard

>>17539886
6 sub dials and a moon phase with erroneous indices; its the equivalent of giving a child a marker and they just scribbled all over the fuckin place. What are those numbers around the major dial for? Why are there so many sub dials and sub-sub dials? Its such a busy and nonsensical dial face that its ugly.
>you just don't know how to read an ultra specific purpose watch for submarine maintenance workers!
Whenever it tries to cram so much into 1 watch, it just looks cluttered and poorly done.

>>17539890
obviously, why not?

>>17539890
cool, at least show us what you'll get

any budget alternatives to the basic Oyster? not necessarily talking about direct homages, just watches in a similar style
budget up to 500$ but preferably cheaper
and one big caveat: needs to be 38mm or smaller

Post shitters you like even though you know they're crap.
(Picrel, 36mm Constellation)

>>17539162
i need this

>>17539768
Why not just get the real deal
It's not like Seiko is much more expensive

>>17539931
citizen nb-1050

>>17539942
I like them. They're like a Datejust but futuristic-looking. I wish they hadn't taken the WR down from 100m to 50m.

>>17539925
The San Martin BB Pro homage (NH34 version).

>>17539942

>>17539942
what exactly is the definition of a shitter? inb4 "anything that's not a Rolex"
anyway the Big Zero looks like something a cartoon character would wear, very fun dial design

>>17539942
I want this.
I know it's dumb, but I like it.
Mido commander 1959
37mm, gold pvd lol
model hasn't changed stylistically since the 50's.
I'd take the gold sunburst dial one too. Leaning to sleezecore.

>>17539662
A datejust. Divers are pleb.

>>17540043
where's your rolex

>>17540043
>GMT Master II and Explorer II are divers

got the grail

>>17540059

>>17540059
>>17540066
???

>>17540072
In the biz, we call those 'scratches'.

>>17540072
shit dude you just gave me a heart attack - looks like it was a tiny piece of dust or hair.
it wiped away

>>17540030
>what exactly is the definition of a shitter?
It's a largely meaningless term, but it can typically refer to watches that are either over-priced, have poor value retention, or highly polarizing looks.

>>17540059
>got the grail
So you're done now?

>>17540076
Did you buy it second hand? I think that specific model has been discontinued.

>>17540080
>It's a largely meaningless term
Agreed. A lot of people in /wt/ think any watch under $30,000 is a shitter. Never mind it looks good, keeps time well, average people think its fine, and is under $300

>>17539271
fucking kek!

>>17540059
Is that a PRX?

>>17540089
lol I have a buddy who calls his gold PRX the “111” because it’s a shitty rip-off of the yellow gold historiques 222.

>>17540081
>>17540089
>>17540084
It was a boutique exclusive, fewer than 100 were ever produced. When they come to market now, the usually sell for about $150,000 USD.

This is a fake, here are the obvious tells without looking at the movement finishing:
1. It’s stainless steel, this model was only ever produced in white gold
2. The Maltese cross below the 12 is too flat, gen is more beveled.
3. The corners of the lugs are rounded off relative to gen, where they are very sharp. This is due to inferior factory tooling.

Was hoping someone would call it out.

>>17539309

>>17539662
Get the GMT master, it’s better than the Explorer 2 in every way. More iconic to the brand. Sub ofcourse is the safes.

Is there a strap I can slap on this so it doesn't look out of place with a tee-shirt or am I cursed to only wear it with a shirt and tie?

>>17539309
Got my San Martin today, what a lovely size is it.

>>17540118
you can try it with a nato or perlon strap, that's usually the go-to for making a watch look more casual
I don't think it's overly dressy with the bracelet though personally, looks very versatile. what model is it?

>>17540130
SUR307
Decent non screw down water resistance
Sapphire crystal
Decent bracelet (folded end links though)
What seems to be a good quartz movement (6N52) that I've had consistently be +0.02 s/d
I got it for a steel a year ago.

I'm afraid a NATO might be a no-no, but I'm going to look into the other type, thanks anon.

Side note: Does Turtlebro still post here? I mostly only break out my save the ocean samurai in the summer now.

>>17539483
you missed the best one, bro

Wdyt? I think this wristwatch is kind of interesting. Is Omaga a respected brand?

>>17540135
sounds nice. too bad it's not smaller or I would consider getting it instead of an SNKL41. or is there a smaller model?

>>17540180 is better than >>17540118

>>17540179
Omega is literally the bottom of the barrel shitter tier

>>17539161
>>17539162
dorky
>>17539167
looks dated
>>17539168
looks kinda old, i think the logo doesnt fit the numbers
>>17539175
dont like the bracelet combination looks dorky to me
>>17539309
logo font doesnt fit the tacky design
>>17539316
theres alot of stuff and is there a name in the bottom lol?
>>17539333
this looks /fa/
>>17539485
looks kinda cool
>>17539502
>>17539516
looks dorky
>>17539521
looks okay
>>17539643
nice color
>>17539662
middle (classy, looks rich) or right
>>17539738
looks clean
>>17539846
looks dorky
>>17539874
looks expensive
>>17539931
middle looks weird, rest looks boring
>>17539942
looks 70s
>>17539996
looks weird why is it cream colored lol
>>17540016
looks okay but i dont like the yellow triangles and dots
>>17540030
this looks cool, best itt maybe
>>17540042
looks thrifted
>>17540059
looks like a scifi movie
>>17540095
looks super expensive 70s disco
>>17540114
looks kinda cool
>>17540118
looks bland
>>17540121
again weird yellow and the red looks old and nasty
>>17540169
looks tryhard
>>17540179
looks homosexual
>>17540180
looks clean

i dont know anything about watches though

>>17540183
But i costs like 1500 bucks lol?

>>17540190
I'm just trolling

>>17540188
All you need to know about watches is Rolex.

>>17540182
it does feel more soulful for some reason, doesn't it? maybe it's the stubby case or the long indices, idk. it has a bit more of an individual character to my eye
I do wish Seiko still made the SARB035 though as a slightly dressier mid price alternative, such a shame it's gone

>>17540192
Ah okay haha
>>17540193
When i think Rolex i think douchebag but to be fair i dont know what they look like

Okay but what if I put it in the sun so you can see how beat to fuck it is?

>>17540179
You ain't a kid no more. We'll never be those kids again...

>Why yes, we DO want the Rolex audience.
>How could you tell?

>>17539152
BEWARE THE DINOZONE
Dinosaur Society members have IQs of over 180 and generally have supernatural abilities ranging from extreme cognitive prowess, enhanced empathy, persuasive abilities, telepathy and other powers some consider unnatural. Dinosaur Society members generally are world leaders or operate the shadow cabal dictating most global policy.

BEWARE
BEWARE
BEWARE

>>17540198
yeah that's better
I like the classic dressy Seiko styling whith those hands. just wish they still made small watches in this style aside from some Seiko 5s

>>17540216
33mm

>>17540219
not in production anymore though, is it?

>>17539161
This guy.
I like this guy.
Posting the greatest and best watch ever.
(You)

>>17540220
Sacm151 is not. Sacm171 is still in production but uglier.

>>17540219
>33mm

are you a femboy trap and/or woman?

if not that ain't the size for you, chief.

>>17539332
I've never heard of any of these shitters

>>17540216
They do

>>17540225
33mm looks perfect on my 7 inch wrist. Post your bizarre 43mm watch or stay silent.

33mm

>>17540236
Lug width?

>>17540231
I hope that thing is fake because that marker is the worst thing I've ever seen.

>>17539309
Found my old citizen marinaut, bought it during high school maybe in 2007. Its like a pre-prx quartz prx.

>>17540238
kek i didnt notice, this looks reall stupid hahaha like it fell off hahaha

>>17539931
Traska makes some nice stuff in that price range

>>17540240
Shit, have to resort to screenshots. Why does 4chan flips pics often?

>>17540247
Looks like an Ebel

FRIENDS, when will EBEL be back? Should i invest now?

>>17539605
Sometimes; I switch out the Speedies onto this, the Forstner Champion, a leather strap, or the standard bracelets. This one is comfy; I hate Nato straps normally.

>>17539750
None. It's a great watch, though not very accurate in timekeeping. This one is better. (pic related)

>>17540238
why would I buy a fake of a watch that only costs $2000?

Broskis, suggest a g-schock for me!
Budget is between 80 to 150 bucks.
Something for everyday casual use. Looking mostly for G-Shock.
Somewhat resistant for careless dum-dums, that's all.

>>17540249
Woah anon, you made me google it. Its super similar, no joke. I never heared about such brand till this moment desu

>the hang tag
>the box
>the paperwork
>the watch itself
rolex is perfect

>>17540237
18

>>17540247
4chan deletes the embedded metadata on all uploaded pics. When you take a pic with your phone it sometimes saves the orientation inside the metadata, so with that data gone the pic is turned.

>>17540266
Understood.
Checked btw

Hey guys, looking for some help, I bought this watch and it hasn’t gotten much wear. Recently I’ve been wearing it quite often and it seems to be losing time quite badly, what would be the cause for this?

>>17540268
you gotta refuel it every so often bro

>>17540269
I’ve been wearing it daily, how shit is this movement? It feels like it has trouble even making it during the 8 hours I sleep without stopping

>>17540275
Kinda weird, i never heared that even entry-mid tier seikos being that bad. Maybe something wrong with your piece.

>month 7 no one noticed my explorer is a Rolex and complimented me

>>17540282
Should have bought a Tudor

>>17540275
Just wind it up fully and then wear it, should be fine.

>>17540282
I've gotten more compliments on this little thing than I have the Rolex but I got the Rolex for me and no one else

>>17540268
>>17540275
There's a good chance you accidentally magnetized it somehow. Or maybe it was dropped. Regardless how it happened, it should have way better accuracy than that. Take it to a watch repair place and get it looked at.

>>17540235
Based. Small watches are better

>>17540235
>33mm looks perfect on my 7 inch wrist
nah it really doesn't
>>17540289
nah they really aren't

>>17540282
i've been with this one girl for like 3 years and it wasn't until we were in bed recently that i asked her to get my watch from the watch stand and check the time, and she took a closer look and asked if it was a rolex, after squinting her eyes to read the logo on the dial. also mind you that this is a korean, and they can be materialistic to an extreme, yet she hadn't noticed.

most people literally have no idea what they look like and i guess they expect more considering how much of a meme the brand has become.

>>17540290
Who asked

>>17540290
tastelet

>>17540042
Reminds me of this.

>>17540287
>american psycho seiko with box
noice anon

>>17540287
lol now if you got the actual DJ...

>>17540290
>nah they really aren't
they are
and the pendulum is starting to swing the other way already, thankfully. the "oversized watch" trend will be look back on as strange and dated

>>17540301
I don't like the linen datejust used in the book, it's also cheaper than the Rolex I actually have.

>>17540251
do they have this with a red or purple dial? I'm looking for a steel sports watch like these, preferably quartz but I'd also go for a thin auto.
Another watch that caught my attention is the formex essence 39, but I think that it could look too gimmicky and there's few videos of the red one

>>17540309
Red sunburst is so good. I still want an Oris Cherry

>>17540282
if you buy watches to get complimented then it's your fault. people just don't care
maybe if it was an all gold rainbow diamond bezel one or two people would have noticed, but no one's going to notice a basic Explorer

>>17540291
this is why you get a cartier tank

>>17540309
what's the seiko on the left?

>>17540312
the Oris has a really nice dial colour, looks too brutal for my taste. The Oris big crown is also nice, if it weren't for the bezel.

>>17540315
Sarb011

>>17540315
An early SARB, 011.

>>17540294
nice ladys watches, tranny
>>17540307
do you match your tiny watches to your chastity belt?

>>17540335
Do you actually own any watches?

>>17540335
Muhammad Ali wore a Cartier Tank. meanwhile, no number of 45mm divers will make your cock bigger

>>17540335
>nice ladys watches, tranny
Imagine being this terminally online

>>17540335
trannies live rent free in your sissy head cutie

>>17540340
Women wear jewellery, not men. That includes a watch. You have a clock on your phone, cupcake.

>>17540364
Wow that's so funny you came to the watch thread and started making fun of watches

>>17540369
:^)

>>17540371
it's okay sissy cuck mommy will let you out of chastity one day

>>17540335
Based Invicta Enjoyer

>>17540371

>>17540372
no thats you

>>17540376
no you! :3

>>17540335
>he hates the memeverso
Impossible

She's arrived

>>17540383
i also need to lose a lot of weight

That's extremely nice, anon. That's a 2446C Mark 4?

Also, >>17539206

I know these threads are no fun allowed, but have a Rolex Gshock

>>17540408
Reality already beat you too it. Nubeo Black Mamba.

>>17540402
MK2 as best as I can tell - but could be transitionary to MK.3 or was serviced or something because it's a Swiss Only dial but clearly a MK.2 or MK.1 case due to the pushers/white chrono hand

>>17540408
AI is the antichrist

any thoughts on Baltic watches?
these look amazing for the price to me and so does the movement. what's the catch? would it be a bitch to service?

>>17540438
it's a chinese movement, some people have reported some issues with it. but really, it's the only micro-rotor movement available for microbrands

>>17540444
Vaucher also sell the VMF5401 but that’s in a completely different league

>>17540438
Really tempted by the salmon MR01 myself.

Does anyone have any site recommendations for buying older Soviet watches or just Russian made watches in general?

Also, what does /wt/ think of Certina?

>>17540422
stop fear mongering

>>17540438
Shit instagram hype watch for coping poorfags

>>17540500
(A)ntichr(I)st

>>17540493
I've always just looked on local Polish auction sites like allegro and olx. If you're in eastern europe that's a good option. You can also look around on ebay, just make sure it's not one of the "indian special" ones that are so common over there.

>>17540408
Imagine how much text a rolex casio would have.
Water Resistant 200M/660ft/0.107991361nmi/20bar
Critically Acclaimed
superlative toughness
Certified light
Model
Lineup
The brand(s) several times over.

>>17539643
it's probably not as field watchy as you'd like, and toward the upper end of your budget, but what about the OCW-S100? full titanium, radio + solar, and the quick time zone change is really cool. biggest downside is probably the fixed end links

>>17540253
kys you make these watch threads terrible

>>17540525
seethe

>>17539643
That citizen is also JJY time only

>>17540515
>engraved rehaut that reads "SCRATCH RESISTANT SAPPHIRE GLASS FOR EXTREME DURABILITY"

work at night. any good watches with a built in light?

>>17540542
Rolex Explorer 124270.

>>17540510
Thanks i'll check those out

>>17540383
Nice!

I am going to buy a 36mm datejust in mint green and nobody can stop me

>>17540517
>fixed end links
I can see the hole in the lugs.

>Seiko released the perfect watch for me
>It's some limited distribution instantly discontinued thing that's sold out everywhere except for one sussy Asia based store that probably doesn't actually have it in stock
I emailed the store. They probably won't reply. Fuck you, Seiko.

>>17540590
you are allowed to post the watch here, I promise nobody here is gonna outbid you (I hope)

>>17540595
I definitely will once I buy it / determine that it's not actually available

>>17540179
neovintage funky shit is pretty cool, although its definitely a bit more niche, most people wont appreciate what they dont recognise.
Eterna CXXV, Softwatch, 90s Emaille UNs, Chopard St moritz and the like all have this a certein kind of appeal

Apologize.

>Imagine not having a Seiko 5

>>17539152

Obligatory

Is a dildo a good idea for a watch stand?

>>17540763
only an expensive premium bad dragon one and not the poortard aliexpress junk

>>17540763
If you're a college aged slut living with her roomies then sure
>>17540759
reddit or here?

TUDOR AND OMEGA AND SEIKO ARE ALL FUCKING SCAM BRANDS

>>17540809
Do go on.

>>17540813
theyre brands for losers, watch archieluxury

newbie here, I'm considering buying an Omega from a Japanese Chrono24 dealer. Is there a reliable customs/import fees calculator you all use for estimating final costs? Thanks

>>17540827
>newbie
>omegay
wrong choice

>>17540830
then what, s Tissot?

>>17540815
>archieluxury
I hope he gets robbed again. I bet he's in this thread right now.

>>17540833
r o l e x

>>17540838
he's based

>>17540577
for your wife?

>>17540815
Archieluxury is a huge Speedmaster fanboy

>>17540827
What country are you importing to? Usually your government's website will have a calculator for the cost of duties/import fees. Just google it

>>17540856
not the hesalite one

>>17540856
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K0nfr8XUpZY

did archie ever get his watches back? and is it true his druggie son was the one who stole them?

>>17540905
he got some of them and his son didn't steal them. scrawny white incels did as expected of crime in straya

>>17540872
Oh no he doesn't like Omega anymore, now I have to stop liking them too

>>17540912
exactly

>>17541147
>pickles
>lettuce
>mayo
NASTY

why dont you cunts post any tutima watches?
im usually asexual when it comes to divers but this one is doing things to me

>>17541175
fucking disgusting

>>17541151
im much more concerned by the fact that this guy put on a speedmaster, a whacky bird shirt some dusty ass work boots, drove his goofy looking ass to in-n-out just to eat in his fucking car balancing his fucking fries on his fucking legs just to get some upvotes by some more retards like himself
americans are such bizarre creatures and i cant wait to observe them in their natural habitat

>>17541175
tuti stands for poop in hindi, and ma for mother

So this watch brand stands for poopy mothers. Did you have one?

>>17541175
rimtutituki

>>17541180
i highly doubt they cared much for any indian language when the company was founded
just ordered this shitter from you guys

>>17540222
Explain why please.

>>17541147
kek

>>17540097
Based repchad. Enjoy your watch

>>17540517
Yeah, you're probably right. It looks like a nice watch, a little bigger than I want but I'll think about it.

>>17540444
how's servicing a micro-rotor movement? would it cost more than the watch like that meme chronograph Seagull?

>>17541353
I don't see how a movement with a micro-rotor would cost more to service than a chronograph. The latter is far more complicated.

>>17541358
I guess I worded the question badly, what I mean is "would it be worth servicing or would the service costs be too high for a 500$ watch, similar to how the Seagull is not worth sevicing?"
I have no experience with micro-rotors, especially obscure Chinese micro-rotors

>>17541359
Well having a micro rotor doesn't change all that much about the movement really. The question about servicing a $500 watch would be the same even if it had a regular rotor.

>>17539333
darn it, forgot to say anything but Seiko

I'm curious about brands that got bought out by fashion conglomerates. Any watches by the below brands worthy of anything?

>Zodiac
>Glycine
>Movado
>Concord
>Ebel
>Rotary
>Corum
>Eterna

>>17541376
No.

>>17541376
lolololol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0buOandoHY8
How many is too many /wt/?

>>17541411
considering a three watch collection myself. one dressier, one more casual and one funkier / wild card watch

>>17541179
I'm American and that photo is ultra cringe. Skinny guy posing in his car to include a mid tier burger and a stupid watch for his 35th birthday. Like doofus, whats the status of your mortgage and investments? If you had a wife and kids you'd be celebrating with them and not using a bauble on the internet to get attention.

Its an ugly watch too.

>>17541428
>whats the status of your mortgage and investments
Wall street bros are so exhausting

>>17541432
>Wall street bros are so exhausting
Not a wallstreet bro: I just get upset when there are tards trying to show off their semenmaster watches like a soft flex and they're buying shiny toys thinking it'll help them while they're drowning in negative net worth.

>>17540282
>buying things for other peoples' attention
lol
lmao

>>17541175
Toot ima. Looks good though

>>17541443
That's a lot of assumptions to make

>>17541179
>>17541428
You're being such weird little cunts over some guy being excited over his new watch.

>>17539152
I hydromodded my citizen 8180. It now has new hands and a sapphire crystal as well

>>17541486
It's a neat effect I'll say that. Probably fucked in the long run

>>17541175
does tutima still use lemania designed movements or is that a thing of the past? if they do i would consider one without a doubt

>>17541486
>>17541488
So... did you just filled it with water?
Am I understanding right?

>>17541492
it's done with oil

>>17541492
No, low viscosity silicon oil. Alternatively you can use mineral oil.

>>17541488
Yeah, slightly unusual effect if you look at it from specific angles that nobody will ever notice. Plus if your watch starts leaking oil you're going to have an oily watch until you fully disassemble it and clean it all out.

Probably water resistant to way past 100m now though; water can't get in if oil already is there.

>>17541501
Yeah, its neat until it starts leaking lol. It wasn't an expensive watch, especially on sale.

>>17541504
Oh just wait until you get an air bubble and get to notice that every time you check the time.

>>17541508
only a matter of time

>Cartier Santos
Based or cringe?

>>17541560
ehh idk, I prefer their dressier watches like the Tank. not a fan of these integrated bracelet designs

>>17541560
So based I sold one and bought another again 6 months later.

£500 in the pocket during the process, take those.

San Martin New NH34 39mm BB GMT Luxury Men's Watch
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-ELy7mg5us

>>17541600
Not sure if I prefer it to v2. Applied vs printed and black vs silver hands on the white one.

Looking to buy a fake cartier tank
What website should I buy it through?

>>17539942
based, pure 1999core
this needs to be worn with a 3 button blazer behind the wheel of a 986 Boxster

>>17541376
>zodiac's old shit
>corum's old shit
>movado's old shit
the rest is trash, new and old.

>>17541600
Silver indices on the white looks retarded. Lazy chinks didn't want to bother to make two different kinds of indices. Just bought the white printed dial version in the sale and that looks great

>>17541626
Just buy a used real one

The old-old scam of selling dopes fake watches as genuine Rolex is long gone.

The new scam seems to be selling $500 absolute dogshit as "1:1 replica" "super clones". I just saw a fake Daytona that was an absolute dog, a fake 4130 top glued on a chink 7750 clone.

Repfags deserve to be exterminated off the face of the earth.

>>17541500
>not using coconut oil for that delicious coconut smell
You deprive your watch's quartz module the joys of the coconut!

new thread, let’s go boys

>>17541782
>>17541782
>>17541782

>>17539738
Reference #?

>>17542363
sne525