/fa/ - Fashion

I just found out about this bizarro Speedmaster and I love it for some reason

>>17475695
There are lots of these kinds of odd automatics. Sadly, the dial proportions are usually fucked up. Are you thinking of purchasing?

For me, it's the DW 8000. The best gshock watch. I even ask for extra light and the watch is so friendly and more than willing to oblige.

One time I asked for light and a buffalo skull appeared. I said, "Wow, time to get tough!" and the nice friendly DW 8000 lit up and read, "Time to get Tough".

Now the watch greets me with "Time to get Tough" and ALWAYS give me light. It's such a fun and cool accessory with my current outfits, I wear it at least 3 times a week for hitting the gym and going on a run, 1-2 times for casual fits on the weekend, and maybe once for dressing up when I'm in a rush but want a great watch that is stylish, tough, and can resist shocks.

I even dip my DW 8000 in the ocean, it's water resistant! What a great watch.

>>17475695
Dial texture and 38mm is pretty cool. I haven't seen this one either.

>>17475698
Not at the moment, I need to pare down my collection if anything. But I've always wanted a Speedy and aside from the date cutout this is one of the better arranged sub-40mm automatic Speedys I've come across. Kinda reminds me of a Longines Spirit chrono but toned down a bit, in a good way.

>>17475704
Any reason you wouldn't get a pro?

>>17475700
Amazing. Knowing when it is time to get tough is invaluable.

>>17475705
Idk about him but it depends on your feelings of the penis dial.

>>17475705
Always figured I didn't have the wrist for one, but I tried on the 3861 model and it's damn compact. I like oddities though, helps scratch my contrarian itch even when I'm looking at a watch as popular as the Speedmaster.

>>17475709
The reason the 3861 is compact is the endlink design, as well as the midcase being slightly shorter than the previous 1861 midcase. It definitely wears easily, and the bracelet with taper wears well too.

Oddities are great though; just be sure you get one in decent shape, and have a watchmaker open it up upon delivery to verify that it's legit.

Nothing wrong with the Speedy pro though...I own 2, and they're awesome dailies.

>Nine of the most beautiful chronograph movements ever made, according to Grand Prix Academy member and member also of the FHH, Haoming Wang.

Notice how there is no Lolex or Gay Sexko, but there is based Omega.

>>17475751
All looks like trash really, just a bunch of random identical junk when you put them side by side like that.

>>17475763

https://www.watchuseek.com/threads/khs-mission-timer-tritium.5471552/

Is this any good?

https://www.aclu.org/cases/cargian-v-breitling
LMFAO BREITLING IS BASED

>>17475778
You're a retard for believing that gay degenerate propaganda.
In 100% of cases like this, the cocksucker was fired because other people were better than him at doing his job. He became useless to the company, so they get rid of him. Simple as.
He then realized he could sue Breitling and get a shit ton of money by accusing them of some bullshit discrimination.

>>17475751
>cam-actuated workhorse cal. 861 in the middle
Are people really this brainwashed, just because it's a Meme on the Moon?

>>17475814
Modern Omega is fucking cringe, but the Speedmaster is still a good watch with a cool history and a nice movement. Literally the only watch they didn't fuck up with some awful modern redesign.
I wish these cheap jews at Omega made a 1:1 reissue of the pie pan Constellation from the 50s, with an upgraded movement.

>>17475819
>Literally the only watch they didn't fuck up with some awful modern redesign.
They did, they recently made it cuck-axial. Enjoy your vendor lock-in.

If a luxury brand like Rolex released a watch with lego pegs, would you buy?

I kinda want to buy a vintage Submariner and wear it on a nato strap (old Rolex bracelets are terrible).

>>17475331
>4th owner
correct, how did you know?
>30 year old
*22 year old

>>17475681
>Is it keeping good time? It's good that you're enjoying it.
the last time i have set it was in october 2022 because of the daylight savings thing, and its still at this very moment within 2-3 seconds (a little slow)

i dread the first service because it will never be that accurate again afterwards, heh

>>17475829
Oh, shit! The anon whose mom bought him a watch! You're still here?! Still a flying bus driver?

>>17475834
>You're still here
eh i just came by because its been almost a year since i have the watch. havent been here in months apart from that
yes im still flying planes for a living

>>17475777
it's shit, but for the price you'd be hard pressed to find another tritium watch, afaik
if you like how it looks, why not
one thing to look out for, if it's an older watch, the tritium might be weaker than you'd expect

I see this general shits on Grand Seiko. What are some alternatives at the same price range that offer similar quality/attention to detail and looks?
>Rolex
I can get a GS for 5k, I'm not getting a real Rolex for that.

>>17475850
GS is fine. They do nothing for me but they’re still good watches.
I’d get one over an Omegay

>>17475827
if you buy a vintage sub you are literally a fucking peak cuckhold, you even diss the shit build of old rolies yourself, the bracelet, fucking hollow crap
but anyway, to the point, you do know vintage subs cost like 300 bucks at their peak? they were the literal Seiko workhorse Pieces of Shit of their day, unironically
and now you wanna shove rolex cock up your ass and pay the GIGA inflated price of a vintage piece just because muh vintage 300 dollar shit build rolie? nah this is straight retardism, mostly for the fact that they were so cheap back in the day
vintage rolies are for FU money retard collectors at this point, unless you find some cheap ass one that is passable
better to buy a new one
or just settle with the cope of some replica/homage POS
like god damn

>>17475827
Watchmaker here, I've repaired a run-of-the-mill 5513 Submariner once. Their design is literally perfect.

>>17475850
>I see this general shits on Grand Seiko
This general shits on weebs who think Grand Seiko is made from samurai katana steel.

The watches themselves are what they are: Seiko, but a little nicer.

>>17475824
>If a luxury brand—
No.

>>17475860
Quite a bit nicer

>>17475857
tell us more about it pls
geniuely interested

>>17475850
>I'm not getting a real Rolex for that.
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/185765382498

>>17475868
I'm talking about the visual design. I mean just look at it.
>narrow lugs and crown guards
>bezel extends in width beyond the 40mm case
>domed acrylic crystal
>no date
>well proportioned ratio of hand size to overall size, versus modern maxi-case Subs, where the hands are getting kinda small for the overall watch
>printed utilitarian dial, no applied and rhodium plated lume dots bullshit

>>17475880
i didnt like the last gen sub
but i love the current gen sub

>>17475880
>rhodium plated
Is there a watch with a rhodium plated case?

>>17475880
>acrylic
yuckerino
niggas still jacking off over 300$ seiko tier pieces of shit? the modern day equivalent of vintage rolexes are gshocks
functional pieces of shits that are cheap
my hyper rational autistic mind will never get over this
never pedestilize vintage rolies
ong I might just hate watches in general tho
>>17475881
nothing major changed tho? barely

>>17475695
Looks good with those numerals.

>>17475700
This mogs the Dino Zone.

>>17475886
they made the lugs thinner & the bracelet wider which imo completely changes the proportions, stepdown from the lugs to bracelet is a lot smoother and the proportion between dial/bezel and lug is better.

also, the bezel is thinner than the last gen one, makes the proportion bezel to dial better

the last gen nearly looks rectangular and very fat, while the new one looks round, proportionate and like a proper watch

>>17475877
And a modern GS will btfo that 50 year old Rolex in terms of construction and accuracy

>>17475895
yeah but its a GS and not a Rolex
im sure some new hundai sportscar is faster than an F40 as well

>>17475895
>Lemme service my Seiko
>Oh fuck no nigga in my country can service this POS Lemme send it To Japan
>fuck
>plus its a fucking Seiko ontop of it at the end of the day

or
>Lemme buy this ancient Rolex shitter that went for 300$ back in the day for 30 times the price

you lose in both these options

when you will watchlets take the logicpill? im too fucking rational

>>17475898
You're in the wrong hobby for logic

>>17475898
>Oh fuck no nigga in my country can service this POS Lemme send it To Japan
move out of africa
>plus its a fucking Seiko ontop of it at the end of the day
>rational
blow it out your ass

>>17475692
Which G-Shock watch should I get as my first? Some people recommend going for something more modern that has Bluetooth capabilities, I feel I don't really need that.
Someone recommended that GW-M5610 is the timeless piece that you can't go wrong with.
Thoughts?

>>17475884
No, rhodium wears off quick.

>>17475886
>>17475881
>zoomer opinions

>>17475899
yeah I figured that out long ago when I rationalized myself out of watches
>>17475900
>move out of africa
i dont think people service gseikos on the reg really
>blow it out your ass
dick suckem
>>17475903
imma literal 30yo boomer my guy, I already have the lawnmower and white monster on deck my g

>>17475853
>>17475886
>durrrr it should be cheap because the modern day equivalent is cheap
You fucking nigger.
Don't act like some genius autist when you can't even understand basic concepts like scarcity, general condition and iconic status of a vintage good.

Pic related is the most expensive vintage car in the world.
Do you unironically think the guy who spent $143M on that old ass Mercedes said to himself "hmmm maybe I should buy a BMW M3 instead, it's 2000 times cheaper and goes faster"? No. Because he bought something unique that makes him happy, and he will probably be able to sell it $500M in 10 years.

You're not some hyper rational autist, you're just some dumb midwit lmao

>>17475914
>>durrrr it should be cheap because the modern day equivalent is cheap
Yes.

>>17475902
In my opinion the 5610 is the best G-Shock there is, and yeah, you don't need bluetooth since the time automatically syncs nightly. Go for it, you won't regret it.

>>17475916

>>17475919
>5610
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbwnXdJTzYE
Do I look for an updated model?

>>17475922
I would, they've made a few quality of life changes to the new one and you can now set the date to dd/mm instead of just mm/dd if that's your thing. (They probably mention that in the video, but I didn't watch it.)

FYI, the one you can get off Amazon right now is the new one even though it still mentions the old EL backlight in the description.

>>17475930
>Amazon
https://www.amazon.com.au/G-SHOCK-5600SERIES-Waterproof-Digital-gw-m5610u-1/dp/B09FLJZ8YV/ref=sr_1_1?crid=4E4NG4K7WJTH&keywords=GW-M5610U&qid=1675690287&sprefix=gw-m5610u%2Caps%2C428&sr=8-1

This is the only one I can find.

>>17475934
>Australia
Sorry about that, I guess it isn't on there for you.

>>17475937
Hard to know which one is the 'updated' model.

I need an affordable Mecaquartz. I'm not asking anymore.

>>17475914
you are putting words in my mouth which I never said

if we are comparing vintage watches and the original sale price vs current price what it should be vs inflation included compared to cars and which have increased more relatively, idk, maybe its not so bad in watches after all

regardless, pointless comparsion, a top of the line sports car of the past was never a work horse shitter car of the times compared to now

a old school rolex was quite literally a modern day seiko/gshock in comparision, they were quite literally, shitters, in the past

now a days, you are paying ludicrous premiums for past shitters, modern rolexes are way more though, as they are luxury watches now, they were shitters in the past

thats the whole point

which solidifies the cucky part

a rare sports car in really good condition, idk, not the same in comparison at all

correct me if im wrong

you are comparing a bog standard old rolex shitter to a unique sale, you could compare some shit like paul newmans daytona or some shit like that in terms of exclusivity, but that was not my point at all

>>17475961
https://www.indeed.com/

>>17475902
>>17475919
I'm torn between:
The OP, DW5600MS >>17475692
5600BB, picrel
And the M5610U you suggested, I looked into it just now, it's about 30$ more than the previous two

>>17475914
That's false equivalence though, since the car in question is no longer in production, but the Rolex Submariner is.

>>17475982
To make things harder, I'm also considering GX-56BB as I'm huge and it might look like a 5600 on a regular person

Can those big g shock watches fit anything at all?

Post some fits with g shock please.

>>17475987
not that i agree with him but youre an idiot.
if mercedes would still produce the car in question, it would be some plasticed out AMG shitcar with a 2 liter lmao 4 banger in it, and it would not even be worth close to what the original is worth.

>>17476010
Are you retarded or do you not know what "false equivalence" means?

AHEM, GENTLEMEN
I will be making an announcement
*clears throat*
>FUCK cyclopses
>FUCK date windows (you don't need them, you DO need a day window)
>FUCK polished middle links on anything other than a jubilee bracelet
>F U C K male endlinks
thank you

how good are these cheap timexes

>>17476027
They look and feel really nice, and the indiglo is great.

>>17476018
Honestly why are date windows so popular anyway? You have to manually adjust them several times a year and they're not really that useful. A day window doesn't need to be changed and would actually be relevant. I'd even prefer a moon window desu.

>apple watch finally fucking died
good fucking riddance, never again most likely
In the market for a real watch now, anything as soi as apple watch but is an actual watch
budget is 1000€

>>17476027
TICK TICK TICK TICK TICK

>>17476027
They are loud enough that you can hear them from across the room, even if you keep it in a drawer.

>>17476055
The 250-1000 range is a completely waste of money. Get something cheap or invest in something much better.

>>17476001
fit outfit or fit wrist?

>>17476055
https://www.junghans.de/en/collection/watches/junghans-radio-control-solar/

>>17476018
based

>>17476075
Outfits with visible G shock. G shocks look a litle bit too bulky, so I wonder if they work with whole outfits.

>>17475968
>a old school rolex was quite literally a modern day seiko/gshock in comparision, they were quite literally, shitters, in the past
That's wrong though. Rolex has always made entry luxury watches. Even in the 50s they were more expensive than Omega or Longines, but cheaper than Patek or Vacheron.

Cop or not?

>>17476094
Unless you're poor and cannot afford anything better, no.

>>17476125
>dements your statement

>>17476125
Well, my daily driver is a f-105, I'm just looking for a cheap but solid non digital one to wear to the office sometimes since I'm supposed to be an adult now.

>>17475902
I recently replaced my ten year old dw5600 with a gw-5000-1jf. I decided to spend a little extra and get the fancy made in Japan version. The design is a little more subdued and feels more substantial and higher quality. I recommend.

>>17476141
GW-5000U-1JF
Forgot the u

>>17476141
how's the strap? is it better?

>>17475692
>>17475982
>>17475994
Just got this guy, the W-218H-1AVEF, I'll be using it to time my dead hangs and sprints
I love the look of the one in the OP and the 5610, but $100-$130 that it costs now was too close for the next best option, the G-SQUAD GBD-200UU-1ER that has:
>vibration
>find-my-phone
>step tracking
>tons of other gimmicks

>>17475968
You probably don't realize this but formatting your post and typing in that manner makes you look like a retarded faggot.

>>17475700
I like gshocks, but holy cringe, you need to kill yourself for posting this

>>17476154
Yeah the strap is slightly better. My old one was warn down, shiny, and not very pliable. The rubber on this strap is softer, more pliable, and has a matte appearance to it.

>>17476133
Unless you're working at Seaworld, don't wear a dive watch to the office.

>>17476084
Every square G-Shock posted in this thread is pretty understated and can fit with every style imaginable. You're thinking of bulky monstrosities like Mudmaster

>>17476164
Getting triggered by how someone is formatting their posts makes you fucking tranny.

Is there any watch similar to the Laco Trier in a similar price range?

>>17476194
How about a Laco Trier?

>>17476193
You're the one getting triggered. Keep pretending to be an apathetic black teen online, I'm sure it's working out great for you. Just know that I (and most other people) know that you're a retard.

>>17476094
The Manlet Humiliator

>>17476201
>no u
Ok?

AE-1500WH
W-218H

>>17476236
They sure are!

>>17476197
Where can I buy one??

>>17476027
Unrepairable, garbage.

>>17476236
>>17476239
Just a follow up then: I got those two watches last year when the strap on my F-91W gave up after 3 years of daily use. I got a 2€ MN-style strap from aliexpress for it. That is my Casio collection, I also have a couple of swiss watches. Best wishes t. finnanon

>>17476055
You could get one of these for 1k.

>>17476163
I was between the 5610 and the gbd 200, but I went with the 5610 because it's a lot thinner and doesn't look as big on the wrist. The 200 looks like a similar size until you see it actually worn.

>>17476315
Thank you mate
For now, I'm blind buying the W-218H, but I'll make sure to try out the 200 in person as it's 5x the price. Just measured my wrist, it's on the bigger side at 7.5"

>>17476164
Based. These threads needs a lot more gatekeeping.

Is it wrong to want a dashboard on your hand?

>>17476403
Its not even the same watch lol. The bezel, dial, subdials, and band are different lol.

>>17475961
Seiko SBTR

Any recommendations for a squared, dress watch? I like the look of JLC reverso but I'm poor and I want to cope

>>17476425
>I like the look of JLC reverso but I'm poor and I want to cope
how much are you willing to risk ? Do you have what it takes ? Can you sacrifice, release, all humanitarian moral limits and go beyond the edge ?
Can you say that you are willing to become
>le CopeMaster
?

>>17476236
I have the Casio on the left, only had it about a month and already has a scratch on the glass and found out the scratch doesn’t come out because it’s plastic and not glass! S m h, but no wonder the watch costs 20 bucks, I don’t recommend it.

Friendly reminder
>Don't throw your money in the trash with fakes or "homages"

>>17476174
this bitch doesn't even eat McChickens

>>17476444
Who hurt you? Why does it bother you that people wear inexpensive copies of overpriced junk?

>>17476444
what level of design constitutes homage? Only the first?

>>17476430
Holy mother of cope, I don't have the guts to pull that off, neither do I want a Chinese knockoff but thanks for the shock

>>17476444
a decent homage/fake is 90% of the watch for 0.5% of the money. you're the spastic for paying so much unnecessarily

>>17476430
Imagine the scumbag supervillain actually daring to wear this. Like Hannibal Lecter would feel unnerved around him.

>>17476430
>>17476465
>>17476481
samefag

How the fuck do I actually buy a Rolex. I configured a datejust 36 on their site. Nothing fancy. The price they state is good with me, but there's no way to buy it online. Do I have to go to a Rolex store? And are these niggers going to inflate the price 2x compared to what's on the site?

>>17476453
>>17476454
>>17476471
>All that poorfag's cope
Don't embarras yourself wearing "homages"

>>17476512
No you fucking retard. Just go to the store and get on a waiting list. You'll get your DJ in a month or 2.

>>17475824

>>17476512
you cant just buy a rolex like that. there are waiting lists, some last years.

>>17476512
it's ok man, next vacation head to switzerland and hit up the rolex store, they'll have you sorted in half an hour, tops

>>17476521
nta, that pic didn't do it for me but i was intrigued enough to go and hunt out a few more: very interesting

>>17476512
The biggest part of the "Rolex experience" is getting treated like shit and having to "invest" a bunch of money to even get on their waitlists, hence why watchfags don't like them (the company, not the watches themselves)

>>17476516
no cope, I just am asking what the parameters for what is considered homage vs inspired vs original

>>17476516
>doesn't have ultra luxury watches or any originals
>hates homages and replicas
Its like hating Great value hot pockets because hormel makes real hot pockets at $1 more. I don't get it.

>>17476454
For me, it's whether it's selling on Aliexpress or not, hahaha

>>17476535
(((ROTH)))

id on the orange dial seiko ?

Have a good start of the week, my friends.

>>17476642
6139-6005 is what Google lens is telling me.

ib4 seething autism

>>17476649
i keep forgetting jewgle has that shit implanted straight into my browser, thnx

>>17476642
Imho it looks like a fairly known vintage chronograph called the Seiko Pogue, my friend.

I fucked mine up, I think the model is a DW-5600E-1VER, I got water in it and then i waited for it to dry and i wanted to try and switch the battery but I never got around to actually buying another battery for it and eventually I lost all the tiny screws and springs
What's the best way in the eu to get spare parts for these things? Or can i buy just the electronic part without the band for cheaper somewhere?

>>17476684
Just buy a new one. It's very cheap to replace the entire watch.

>>17476512
Just go to an official Rolex dealer and tell them what watch you want. Like 50% of their output is basically the watch you configured, you'll have that thing in no time. Always MSRP and you pay when you pick it up (don't forget to tip though!).

>>17476647
Hey lawyer any new adds to the collection?

>>17476684
If it's just screws and springs, look for a broken second hand. They usually cost less tgan a brand new pack of four caseback casio screws. If it's the electronics you need to replace, just get a new one.

>>17475692
picrel is the greatest and best watch
all else is cope

while the f-91w is the best watch ever
i do have a couple g-shocks
but the f-91w is always my go-to daily
5610 is best bang for buck
carbon is my personal favorite g-shock

>>17476141
>The design is a little more subdued and feels more substantial and higher quality.
How? Just because you paid more lmfao?

>>17476647
MORTADELLO RITARDELLO
MANGIATORE DI FAGIOLAAAAAA

>>17476718
>don't forget to tip though
kek, you're fucking with me right? I'm in yurop

>>17476647
Frenchfag fatso

>>17475902

non-bluetooth is fine, although I do like the find my phone feature that I think all bluetooth models have (i can never keep track of my goddamn phone)

>>17476763


what makes carbon your fav?

>>17476722
Hey, my friend. Yes, as a matter of fact, I do have a new watch, and one quite in tone with the theme of the thread, I may add.
The girl I'm dating recently gifted me a custom G-Shock from IFL collab with the Dial Artist for christmas.
She knows I love watches and saw me wearing my red G-Shock GA2100 and I guess Instagram made the rest. lol
I'm quite happy with it, the custom dial lumes like no other under UV light.

>>17476816
Mortadello isn't French. He's from some third-world shithole in the Americas.
The Frenchtard is a villain he made up, some guy who bought a used Rolex Explorer.

>>17476838
>The girl I'm dating recently gifted me a custom G-Shock from IFL collab with the Dial Artist for christmas.
Don't lie, fatty. You bought that for yourself. No girl (nor you, for that matter) has seen your dick since you crossed the 150kg threshold several years ago.

It seems some anon's rabid seething knows no ending, eh? LOL

>>17476821
nta, but the Carbon looks cool and is very, very light. It also has a titanium caseback.

>>17476313
>1k mall Seiko
lmfao

>>17476852
>It seems some anon's rabid seething knows no ending, eh? LOL
No one can help you with your own personal problems except you.

>>17476190
I would like to see some outfits with rounder bulkier gshocks, like pic rel. I wonder if those G shocks are wearable or they are too much.

>>17476866
Those outfits would all be very casual and very outdoorsy. You have to be unironically larping or extremely obese >>17476838 to pull off a non-square G-Shock in "normal" situations.

>>17476718
If we talking America, would it be expected from Rolex representative to tip him back for a tip? If yes, how many levels of recursion tipping should happen in this interraction?

>>17476838
That's... unexpectedly good. I really like it.
>google ifl gshock
>$600
WTF

>>17476878
They know gays are terrible with money and will buy anything with a rainbow on it.

>>17476885
Is it being terrible with money or is it just a function of "pride has no price"?

Fag probably couldn't source a Rainbow Daytona, though. (Or maybe it just looked shit on his chubby wrist?)

>>17476885
But I'm not gay, anon. I just liked the starry dial, but it's just too fucking expensive.

>>17476888
>But I'm not gay, anon.
We're splitting hairs. OK, yes, a trans-woman who's into men isn't TECHNICALLY gay, but you get the point. (Love is love, and all that.)

>>17476838
Oh, look. Another watch I like but can't afford.

>>17476890
love is love until people love kids.
calling yourself a girl and then fucking a guy is still gay, but all trannies are "lesbians" anyway because they're incels.

>>17476141
Yum
>>17475919
This is the correct answer
>>17475892
you shut your fucking face the dinozone is unmoggable. Only high IQ chads roll with the Dinosaur Society

>>17476838
>Hey, my friend.
You have no friends loser.

>>17475919
I would buy one today if it were near $50, but at $110 it just seems overpriced. Electro illumination would be best, solar panels are neat, and the nightly radio sync is cool but not $50 cool for me.

Behold.

>>17475919
>>17476956
You have to take into account that the resin will crack and get greasy and disgusting and basically the watch will start looking like shit in a few months, you have to replace it yearly.

>>17476956
>I would buy one today if it were near $50, but at $110 it just seems overpriced.
What are you talking about my man? I tip my masseuse $200. Are you joking?

>>17476236
>>17476163
>>17476315
>>17476141
>>17475919
Bros, I read this thread last night and went into a local store to buy myself a g-shock, but i read the model number wrong. What I came out with is a Dw-5610SU-8DR. Amy thoughts on this one? Should I take it back? It's not my fault all these models look the same and almost have no difference bros. I swear I'm not blind.

>>17477004
Take it back. The one you just bought doesn't have solar or multiband, and you want both.

>>17477011
Fuck..

>>17477013
Yeah they say multiband and tough solar on the dial if they have those features.

Strap is temporary

>>17476444
>pay 200 for a top replica
>it's virtually indistuingishable
>chinese rep asks to pls suck me off instead of the reverse
>I shit on the rolex jews
>I shit on the rolex buying faggots
how is this not the most based thing there is? cope with "investment", seethe with "but it's not real" and finally dilate with your horrid taste

>>17477079
>nignog mentality
Sad you matter so little to yourself.

>>17477086
glad I can tell the truth to myself, guess it comes with being based

>>17477098
>it comes with being based
My sides

>>17476444
I disagree with a lot of the sentiment that the lookalikes and fakes are just as good as the original in most cases, however I think their can be a lot of value to be had there. A half decent lookalike can get you the same style as the original for cheap so you can buy other watches that you like more and view as a better value.

Nice trips btw.

>>17477011
>>17477013
Store won't do a refund and I don't wanna push it. They do exchanges though. Can someone help me shop for a g-shock with the online catalogue?https://www.prouds.com.au/watches/mens/casio-g-shock?p=4

>>17476763
It's light and looks cool.
That's it.
Otherwise, I prefer the slimness of the F-91W.
Also the A158.

>>17477137
Was meant for:
>>17476821

Not a G shock, but it is a solar Casio and has water resistance for about $35 at Walmart.

I'm feeling the urge to get a G-Shock from this thread.

Should I go for the 5600, 6900, or CasiOak? Those are the ones the appeal to me most.

>>17477191
5610 tough solar and then Casioak. Both are extremely based.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nptS5yc6MuQ

Any watches like this that don't say Seiko on the dial but are the same price? Even better if they're tonneau.

>like the flashiness of polished metal bracelets
>metal bracelets are uncomfortable as fuck

>>17477191
Casio GA 2100

>>17477205
You're out of luck, anon. Besides Seiko, only Chopard and Angular Momentum make urushi dials, and both are very expensive.

Why would you ever buy an Omega at an Omega boutique rather than an AD? Boutiques dont give discounts. And before you quote text me
>Why would you ever buy an Omega

>>17477254
>Why would I ever buy based Omega?
Gee, who knows...

>>17477246
>metal bracelets are uncomfortable as fuck
???

>>17477258
ive tried
>prx
>oyster clasp on 2022 oyster
>jubilee on a 1990 datejust
all felt uncomfortable

>>17477257

>>17475941
the updated one has the U in the name.
honestly, I'd go for the old version with the better backlight. there is something about that old-school glow that really seals the deal for me. the new backlight is just a little led in the corner and it's nowhere near as good imo.
I have this watch and I wear it every day. I love it. I have several other watches, a few mechanical watches, but I always come back to this one. I feel like the aesthetics are perfect. I love the red around the dial.
it just looks so 80's and I'm so very happy that my grail watch is so cheap and I own it and now I don't worry about watches anymore because I already have the best one :D

>>17476778
are you retarded? it doesn't have the red on the dial, it's got the heavier screw down back, and the module is made of stainless steel so it's heavier than the plastic modules in other models.
everything about this watch is more premium down to the material on the strap.

>>17476141
I really wish there was a version of this watch with the same colours as the 5610. I love that retro design. or even better if they made one that had the same design as the original. that pop of red on the 5610 really pushes it over the edge for me, but I want the premium materials.

>>17477253
I just like that it has golden bits on it and roman numerals, looks classy.

>>17477259
try milanese then, last hope for you, but if you find a mesh bracelet uncomfortable then it's not the metal that's the problem

>>17476973
Based Walmart watch

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/9a_juxtcRNU

Ok I'm getting this, it's fucking amazing.

>>17476027
based imho, beater watch if i have to get my hands dirty, like i was wearing it while jerking my shii earlier that was awesomesauce, i absolute refuse to jerk off while wearing my oyster perpetual vintage, sometimes i do steal my mom's cartier and panties and have a little dance but anyway the timex is classic man. simple, none of that moonphase date altitude air pressure likesperminute fitbitch shit just simply.. this is what time it is.. and it's really not that loud unless you are a little bitch. i have a grandfather clock in my bedroom that makes every second sound like a bullet entering the chamber of a gun for hours on end.

>>17475902
>Which G-Shock
Amazfit gts 4 mini

>>17476027
I was looking at getting one of these but was sort of put off by what people say about the ticking. I don't mind ticking, I sleep with a fairly loud quartz clock on my bedside table, but is it loud enough that other people would hear? Say if I was in a quiet classroom or library or something would others get annoyed at the ticking? Pic is just a watch I think looks cool and I might try to get soon.

>>17477310
doesn't look too bad, but is it like 15mm thick or only seems like that?

>>17475919
>>17475994
>>17476141
>>17476763
>>17476838
>>17476866
Based Gshock enjoyers

>>17477321
Anyone who'd get annoyed by that has mental issues. It's not that loud.

>>17477257
For entry level cam-actuated workhorse movements?

I don't know, I tend to look at NOS Sturmanskies for that.

I have some slightly autistic requirements for a watch strap. It has to fit 22mm lugs and be unpadded, leather (shitty leather is still okay), brown with tan/white boxed stitching, ideally be between 2-3mm thick, and have a silver buckle (ideally brushed).

Kind of like a hybrid between these two, as the one on the left has an unpadded strap but has open stitching, while the one on the right has a padded strap but boxed stitching.

Does anyone ever seen something that'd fit this bill?

>>17477313
I am intrigued by some smartwatches but am very wary of planned obsolescence.

can anyone recommend a sturdy vintage soviet watch with luminous hands? i work on a submarine and dont want it getting fucked up while im doing maintenance and shit

>tfw cheapest Seamaster there is
Who poorfag luxury?

>>17477389
https://www.meranom.com/
Though be advised, Russian lume is garbage. You can always hit up Ebay for a superluminova-modded Amphibia dial and hand set, and have a watchmaker install them.

>>17477137
>Slimness of the F91W
>blocks your path

>>17477389
>lume
>in sub
it's gonna need to charge and a lamp is a very shitty lume charger
look for tritium tube watch, maybe marathon or some chinkshitter if you want it cheap

>>17477191
Casio oak is for queers.
It's hard to read, it's enormous and it's also clearly trying to glam on to being vaguely like an AP when everyone knows it's not. Plus the shitty hover hands

>>17476760
my nigger

legit seamaster for £240. but is it just too old and ugly?
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/334725662041

>>17477391
man I've been looking at these too, they're slim too, only problem is finding one with a good bezel action. They just look more manly than the new faggot shit out.

>>17477427
Yeah, replaced the bezel spring in mine. Already mostly broke after three years, while barely wearing it. It's just flimsy.

>>17477416
It's a crazy dated design, even more so than 80's-90's Tag Heuers. I keep seeing them on Yahoo Japan, but never bothered to look at them closely, they probably sell for not a lot.

>>17476094
Probably the best thing you can buy for $40 if your wrist can support 43x48.5.
I think they're closer to $80 now sadly.
I bought mine in 2016 and it's still going strong

Will more people shit on me behind my back for wearing a Seiko 5, or a Timex?

>>17477450
>wearing a Seiko 5
was my first watch when I was 12

>>17477450
People won't give a shit. Maybe some watch autists, but how many of those do you know irl?

>>17477356
>Sturmanskies
LOL, now that's a shitter

seiko 5's are great. get one of these in grey, gorgeous
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sP76Id8_wgg

>>17477468
Uses a comparable Swiss movement though.

>>17477450
Nobody but other watch autists that are few and far between gives a flying fuck about our watches, it's all in our heads, anon. Wear and enjoy what you like.

>>17477482
I see no finishing at all, anon. It's not only about movement construction, but also movement finishing.

>>17477493
>I have to have polished internals that I'll never see!
Kindof a strange requirement. Let me guess, no glass caseback, you don't even own tools to remove the case back, and you enjoy paying more for extra work nobody will ever see?

>>17477493
>It's not only about movement construction, but also movement finishing.

>>17477495
Except you can see this >>17477264 was taken thru the crystal. Yes, I like to see the quality of what I'm buying.

>>17477504
>what is watchmaking?

>>17477548
jomw loves this thing for some strange reason. he must mean for young kids i spose

>>17477552
Nostalgia

>>17476190
Tbh I still wanna get a Mudmaster eventually. Is there a specific variant I should aim for? I really like the GWG-1000.

Why does Rolex mostly make monstrosities instead of sleek shit like this?

>>17477551
>was taken thru the crystal.
And the surface finishes on those parts is atrocious. Not only does it have shaper lines, it also has fly cutter lines. Both with dull cutting bits. Good edge chamfer radius, but it looks like they were going for ugly on the remainder of the surface finish. Even the plain bead blast or tumbler finish looks better.

>>17477577
Might as well buy a Casio at that point.

>>17477577
Consoooooomers want a conspicuous display of wealth, not a subtle and attractive watch. They want diamonds, LOOK AT ME aesthetics, and "wow that looks expensive" watches. I agree that Rolex is very handsome and classic, but if you didn't know watches or see the "Rolex" on it, it looks like a $50 watch.

>>17477586
>dull cuts
>sharps
>plain bead blast looks better

Everything is possible when you make up shit.
It's excellently finished for a 7-10 k watch.
Also, I now know you're full of shit.

My personal idea is wearing something under 41mm is perfect for all the short men under 165cm height.

>>17477611
This is true. They are known as wristlets.

>>17477607
>its expensive so that means its a good finish!
Yeah, go tell that to actual machinists and they'll cringe at that surface finish. Lets just overlook that some finishes are uniform brushed finishes, and others show tool marks. Yuck, they couldn't even use the same metal finish for parts touching each other.

>>17477577
>explorer
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIING

>>17477639
It's also the best looking watch Rolex makes

>>17477642
That would be the Air King

>>17477683
>>17477642
>not the daytona
bless. dont worry, it's ok to be wrong sometimes.

>>17477689
Daytona is top 3...maybe top 2.

>>17477683
Imagine being literally delusional.

>>17475692
Another family to the member

>>17477756
Stop now while you're only $10 in. You're heading down a dark path.

>>17477756
Based

Has Teddy Bulbasaur or one of those doofuses done a video on the new smaller Bulova Moonwatch yet? I'm too poor for a Speedy but recently have a hard-on for HAQ and I want to see if the lug-to-lug is small enough for my babby wrists.

Just looked at the Bulova website, holy fucking based, they're bringing back tiny elegant women's watches.

I like the look of these G-shocks.
Anything else that captures this feel or just go for it?
>Women's watch
I'm aware.

Wish I had a gf I could dress in nice horology tho.

Do they make screen protectors for casio watches? Or is there an easy to way to polish them that doesn't involve polishing cream and a lot of rubbing?

>>17477804
>is there an easy to way to polish them that doesn't involve polishing
Try using your mind powers, or something. Or just fuck off.

>>17477817
Or you could read the question and give me a real answer

>>17475692
ID on Joel Salatin's watch?

>>17477804
>Do they make screen protectors for casio watches?
Like you want the precut screen protector film? How lazy are you?
>is there an easy to way to polish them that doesn't involve polishing cream and a lot of rubbing?
Say that question out loud and how stupid it sounds.

>>17477450
>Seiko 5
yes, because it's screaming "I AM A POORFAG WHO WANTS TO PRETEND THEY'RE INTO WATCHES BUT I'M POOR SO I BOUGHT THIS SHITTER THAT NEITHER TELLS THE TIME NOR IS ACTUALLY WELL FINISHED OR ANYTHING ELSE"

>timex
Like a quartz analog or an ironman? Based. It's the "I drive a stationwagon" stealth wealther

>>17477804
giving a shit about protecting your shitter watch shows you're a pleb. It's SUPPOSED to be a shitter. If and when something happens to it as a based person you just don't give a shit, so long as it still tells the time. If it DOESN'T tell the time after a couple of years then you pull out a Mr. Jackson and get a new one. Babying a shitter plastic watch defeats the purpose of having a shitter plastic watch.

>>17477804
>Do they make screen protectors for casio watches?

>>17477804
nice bait

>>17477756
>proudly displaying a box of plastic garbage

>>17477833
>Like you want the precut screen protector film? How lazy are you?
it seems like such a use case that I figured people would have already made something out of it.
>Say that question out loud and how stupid it sounds.
So no, thanks.

>>17477839
>pleb
post $1000 watch

>>17477798
Go for it if you like it brother, no need to ask permission or fight imaginary objections

I want to get a shitter to wear about when I don't want attention. Is it better to just get a solar or quartz watch and not worry about it keeping time over a Seiko 5 shitter?

>>17477939
Solar quartz seiko

Sold my Oyster Perpetual at a $400 profit. Don't want to buy luxury watches anymore

>>17477867
Why would they make precut pieces of plastic for the hundreds if not thousands of hardlex shapes and sizes?

And no, there isn't a way to polish something without polishing it, today you learned something I guess.

talk me out of it or recommend me a similar alternative (>$1k dressy watch)
I don't like the lacquered dial, and would prefer no date and if possible small seconds. other than that I really like it.

>>17477756
Very nice collection pic, my friend. I particularly like the bottom left one. Saved.

>>17477786
This seems like a very nice design. I'm impressed and dig it a lot. Hope you find it fitting to your wrist size.

>>17477798
If you like it, get it. Do not worry about others opinions.

>>17477804
If you choose a G-Shock, I don't think you could actually need it.

>>17477939
I would suggest a G-Shock GA 2100. Excellent watch and very sturdy.

>>17477620
Vostok mechanical

>>17476973
...Does the bottom subdial even work?

>>17478020
TARDOLINO GORDOLINO
SUCCATORE DI COCCOLAAAAAA

>>17478020
MORTADELLO RITARDELLO
MANGIATORE DI FAGIOLAAAA

>>17478024
What good would it be even if it did work, unless he works in Alaska or in a hole

>month 5 of Rolex ownership
>no compliments

>>17478040
nice rolex anon

>>17478040
Nobody gives a shit about your jewelry. Did you get the entry level one that looks like a $40 Casio? >>17477577

>>17478058
Yeah, I got an explorer

>>17478020
The cyclops makes it look like the date had a stroke.

>>17477391
this is unironically my favorite omega.

>>17478078
Yeah, unless you're a watch nerd that nobody likes talking to, it looks like a $50 casio or whatever. Stainless bracelet and case, plain black face and hands. Its only going to appear to be a Rolex if they're up close and read Rolex.

When was the last time you approached a stranger and complimented them on their watch? Probably never unless it was a balding guy with facial hair which you don't want either. Buy and wear a watch because it makes you happy, not because you want compliments. Who knows, maybe you're fucking ugly and people don't want to compliment you or talk to you anyway.

>>17478040
>Is that a Rolex? Nice!
There. However, keep in mind that irl almost no one cares about which watch you have, or even if you're wearing one at all. We have them mainly for our own amusement.

>>17478084
LOL Now I can't stop seeing that, my friend. Even the seven looks weird too.

>>17478106
>When was the last time you approached a stranger and complimented them on their watch?
A couple months ago I struck up a conversation with a guy because he was wearing a Zenith El Primero. I've had people start talking to me about watches based on something I'm wearing. It's really not that unusual, it's just that 99.9% of people aren't watch people.

I will say that I typically don't comment on Rolex because probably 80% of Rolex buyers aren't actually interested in watches.

>>17477798
I bought one by accident thinking it was the GM-5600 and it wore really small on me, and I'm a wristlet. Everything but the size is great, get the GM-5600.

If anyone gives a fuck, I replaced it with the GM-2100 and I love it, and surprisingly it gets complimented all the time.

>>17478119
>I will say that I typically don't comment on Rolex because probably 80% of Rolex buyers aren't actually interested in watches.
Story time
>be anon
>anon goes to aquarium
>sees the guy next to him at the aquarium wearing a Daytona
>''Hey, nice Daytona''
>''No it's a Rolex"

>>17478119
If a guy approaches me to talk about my watch, I'll make a little small talk and try to remove myself from him. Its so fucking irritating when some boomer approaches me in a parking lot telling me about their harley they haven't ridden in 3 years, or how they sold their bike because they saw too many friends crash and die, or how they owned a similar model in the 70s. Holy shit I do not fucking care. Say nice bike and fuck right off.

If some balding dork with facial hair wants to chat me up about my watch I'll make the same small talk and appear to want to get away from him. Just say nice watch, and fuck off. At worse, nice watch, what is it I'd like to get one myself and politely go away.

If a chick uses it as an opener she's not interested in watches. Change the conversation and keep her interested in you, not your gay little "time piece". Watches don't attract girls though nor do they care. Stop wearing watches to get compliments. Wear it because you like it. From an F91W to a $100000 whore cares.

>>17475692
Is there a way to buff scratches out of the displays of F91Ws and the like? I have a practically brand new F105W with a big nasty gouge on the display that I got on it a week after getting it, and I haven't used it since. What would work well? Baking soda? Brasso? Polywatch?

>>17478133
You have crippling autism.

>>17478136
Depends how deep the scratch or gouge is. If its a light scratch yeah something lightly abrasive in a paste like polywatch should work. If the gouge is bad you have to remove all of the undamaged material down to the depth of the scratch evenly. Theres a lot of videos on youtube that include using polywatch on a non-sapphire crystal, even with a badly scratched crystal it can 'improve' it and with light scratches it can make it nearly new again so you don't have to fully replace it and disassemble the watch.

On the other hand, its a $21 watch, I wouldn't recommend spending $7 on polywatch and probably an hour working on the watch. Just buy a new one and use the scratched one as a hard beater you no longer care about.

>>17478140
I know, its ended relationships, ended friendships, prevented me from being happy, and enjoying many things in life. On more than 1 occasion I've wondered if being a socially retarded autist would pay me disability for the rest of my life. I hate work and get super bored easily.

You ever sat in a quiet room and pressed your watches to your ear to see which one ticks the loudest and quietest? I have. I hate myself and am terribly lonely.

>>17478146
Thanks for the advice.

>On the other hand, its a $21 watch, I wouldn't recommend spending $7 on polywatch and probably an hour working on the watch. Just buy a new one and use the scratched one as a hard beater you no longer care about.
Yeah, I mean, you're probably right. That one just especially bothers me because I got the scratch almost immediately after buying it, so it feels a little wasteful buying a new one. I figured it wouldn't hurt to have something on hand in case I scratch another one of my watches as well (I have quite a few Casios).

What is the best watch to cope as a poorfag until I can buy a real watch?

>>17478166
Right there with ya man, I have a casio analog quarts I fell in love with and now theres a scratch on it and its no longer made. I know I could improve the scratch with polywatch but fuck it, its a cheap watch almost not worth the price to replace the battery but I do like it still because of how plain and simple it is along with 36mm. Its wasteful but whaty'a gonna do ?spend a bunch of time and effort to still have a damaged watch?

>>17478169
Some cool Soviet watch

>>17478133
This is really not my experience at all, especially if I'm wearing something a little off the beaten path like JLC. I'm more than happy to talk watches with random people for a few minutes. If I saw someone wearing one of my dream watches I'd have to make a comment if only because their opinion is worth 100 shitty "watch journalism" reviews since they actually paid for the damn thing.

>>17477777
I squint at those quints

>>17478145
Cool.

>>17478169
How poor are you?

>>17478169
A168 a700 or a1000

>>17478108
>>17478020
W2C these straps?
Chopard is based.

>>17478145
There was no need for that date window frame though.

>>17478108
MORTADELLO RITARDELLO
MANGIATORE DI FAGIOLAAAA

>>17478238
Third world poor

at this point I'd rather take blackd hamilton fag over this chubby chaser

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nptS5yc6MuQ

Why shouldn't I buy this, tell me now before I click on it.

>>17476027
They're garbage. I wish the movements were better. My weekender second hand was misaligned but also jumped every second inconsistently. Kinda butt. Casio is way better for basic movements.

Recommend some white dial watches negoros. Thinking a sinn 104 but I already have a seamaster as my dive watch, this isn't a diver but same styling mostly. Junghans isn't calling to me, thinking another German watch would be cool tho.

love bright, vibrant coloured watches. i just got this. a diver's watch, model name "juicy", by a company named Muff. so that'd be a juicy muff diver. love it.

>>17478451
are you the one who ordered in December? I thought you wanted the pink muff

I have about $16,500 left in student loans and about $15,000 in savings. By the time Joe's forgiveness plan gets tossed out in court I should have somewhere in the neighborhood of $18,000 with which I'll pay everything off in one go.

The thing is, I kind of want to buy a pantydropper and I figure I could get a decent Rollie, maybe something like a Datejust, for around that much. But that would leave me with nothing left to pay off my loans.

What should I do? Is it worth it? I don't make a lot of money but I make enough to get by OK.

>>17478495
nup not me

This signing machine from Jaquet Droz can write stuff for you. Yours for only $375000.

>>17478040
Sucks to be you, my 80's Seiko Bishop gets noticed by women, and watchfags literally want to rip it off my wrist to get a look.

>>17478682
For $375000 can you make it sign your own name, or for that money you can literally buy a machine that writes the name of somebody else?

>>17478306
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nptS5yc6MuQ
>
>Why shouldn't I buy this, tell me now before I click on it.
???

>>17478385

Just had one of these (SUR309P1) in the store for a battery change.

Here's what I don't like about it: seems there's a weight stuck on the caseback for the watch to feel heftier, because it only has one of those puny quartz movements.

Just a heads up that even Seiko is doing this now with their poorfag (this is maybe a 250€ watch) models.

>>17478385
How about some Arita Porcelain?

>>17478385

My Raketa Copernicus came in, i'm very happy about it.

>>17479042
Just wondering if I should get a shorter strap, or is this fine?

Does anyone have any experience with Dan Henry watches?

>>17479042
I don't mind the dial, case, or band, but those hands are so ugly. The giant circles is what gets me.

>>17479042
>>17479048
Nice, enjoy wearing it.

>>17479083
The unique hands were the selling point for me actually, combined with the story behind them.

>When Soviet Raketa designers created the Copernicus model, they had the following idea in mind: the big circle (minute hand) symbolises the Earth, and the intermediary circle (hour hand) symbolises Jupiter. Why? Because the Earth orbits the sun in 1 year and Jupiter in 12 years: exactly the same ratio as between the minute hand (big circle) that “orbits” the dial in 1 hour and the hour hand (intermediary circle) that “orbits” the dial in 12 hours.

>>17479086
Thanks!

AYO sheeeet look at my nigga watch, only 40mm+ case diameter fo me nigga i need that big watch like my dick nawimsayin? Watchu doin' wit dat 35mm watch, you some kinda bitch or summin?

>>17479097
Kinda neat concept I guess, not sure why anyone other than astronomy buffs would really know that but I guess its a bit of a quick conversation piece.

LOL look at this guy picrel, trying to sell this chinese patek knockoff for 140€. i told him that it's punishable to sell knockoffs so he took it out.
2 min later he sends me another chinkwatch asking if this one was also a problem lol

>>17479193
Looks fine to me! Also, only actual nerds would be able to tell the difference. Even Rob Spaghetti admitted he bought a fake Pannerai because he had his real one stolen in an airport and later returned, but still mostly wears the fake because he doesn't want to lose a $30,000 watch again.

>>17479193
this....
i just told him that i wouldn't even use it if it was free and this bitch just said he hopes that teens and unaware people would buy it...

>>17479202
except that this thing looks as if construction worker made it

>>17479193
>>17479205
>i told him that it's punishable to sell knockoffs
What are you? The watch police? Let him sell fakes, if you're so fucking dumb you think a $20,000 watch selling for $140 is normal then you deserve the fake. Some people just want the general look of the high end watches because of the general shape, not because it has heritage, and it was made by some swissman after hand filing brass gears and certifying its accurate to within 2 seconds a year. Granted, $140 is probably $100 too much, but regardless, let people direct the industry with their wallet. They're clearly fakes and knockoffs, homages/replicas. Basically you're upset a chinaman is selling cheap shit. Theres a reason all the cheap knockoff garbage comes from china and they build industries and factories every day because people keep buying it.

>>17479209
calm down robin dipshit hood.
i told him that for his own sake. soon or later people would report him anyways and then he'd be in deep shits.
but selling overpriced crap to teens or retards is not right.
only germans, mutts or hohols would do that foul shit.
you're probably german

>>17479219
Oh you're helping him. Who would you report him to? The chinese government that knows he's selling fakes? You're such a retarded eurocuck you want the police and government to do everything for you. Just mind your own business.

>>17479238
This desu. Eurocucks thinking the big government will step in when the chinese government couldn't possibly give even less of a shit

>>17479193
>>17479203
Damn that looks nasty, i'd rather just wear a Seiko.

>>17479042
W2c? I know they're almost always Frankenstein's these days. It would be neat to shove a better movement into it.

Strap on CA-53W is falling apart should I just replace the strap or buy a new CA-53W?

>>17479324
This guy on ebay was selling two NOS with original box and papers. I got one of them, he still has one left. A bit pricey for the watch but I thought it was worth it for NOS. I can just say this seller is not a scam, and it's not a franken. Why would you replace the movement though? It runs pretty good.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/266010307038?hash=item3def7329de:g:oRAAAOSwasBjgjC2

Can someone please tell me what size screwdrivers i need to chris ward c65 aquataine? I only can find two posts online one says 1.2 mm one says 1.4. Thanks

new thread when

This is a blatant ripoff of the Bel Canto, Christopher Ward should sue them.

>>17479449
M3oF?

>>17479449
Are those tourbillons even attached to anything? Whats with the random gear and bridges? Is that watch a shitpost of fidget spinners so the wearer can just wiggle his hand and watch them move? The fuck even is that?

>>17477079
Based

>>17479447
Now