/fa/ - Fashion

>>17473670
Both are about 300 EUR - who wins?
>Joker card: a Seiko Blue Moon with an open heart

>>17473677
neither. save your $ and buy a decent watch

>>17473679
Thanks mate
Phew, this looks quite steep

>>17473677
Allegedly Seiko owns Orient but between those 2 I'd get the Seiko. Open hearts are neat to look at like the first 20 times, after that you just stop seeing the tourbillion. If you have a crystal caseback watch, try to think when the last time it was you flipped the watch over and just looked at the tourbillion specifically? I think I looked at my caseback once in the last 6 months.

I have a non open heart Orient, love it generally. Just bought a Seiko, verdict is still out.

>>17473670
>Big monstruos divers
Mynigga

>>17473677
From those two I'd definitely go for the Presage too. Great choice imho.

>>17473687
Kek

Is it worth haggling for a discount on Omega Aqua Terras nowadays or no

Can we go back to that guy who paid off his wifes debt, then bought her a car, and now she's cucking him?

Why are some men like this that enjoy throwing hundreds of thousands to some thot?

MOM I POSTED IT AGAIN

>>17473697
fat retard

>>17473701
Yeah, my money is that "his" kid ain't even his. 50 bucks.

>>17473677
I'd get the Presage if I were you. It's absolutely beautiful, pictures don't do it justice.

>>17473701
i'm the guy who asked him if it is his kid. when did he say his wife was cucking him?

>>17473697
MORTADELLO RITARDELLO
MANGIATORE DI FAGIOLAAAAAA

>>17473706
You posted your used Rolex Explorer and it barely fit your wrist, Baguette.

>>17473699
>Is it worth haggling for a discount on Omega Aqua Terras nowadays or no
It's always worth haggling. They can only say no. It's not like they'd raise the price.

>>17473716
fat insane retard arguing with imaginary people lmfao

>>17473719
Please post your BEST CHART and how it proves Lawyer anon is elder god tier again

What Couldn't resist?
>>17473704
>>17473715

just bought pic, looks really nice imo

>>17473723
whats up with that crown guard how

>>17473691
Reading your post, I realized the opposite - other people ARE the ones seeing this for the first 20 times. Even though it's a tired parlor trick to you, it's something to talk about on dress watch occasions (weddings, meetings etc.)
>>17473697
I'm leaning towards the Presage as well, pictures don't really seem to do it justice.

>>17473721
lol what
why are you talking about yourself in third person fatardo

>>17473724
just a gimmick i spose, a stylish one though i think

>>17473712
Thanks haha, you said my line as I was writing it!

>>17473723
>CASENO
>MTWTFSS

>>>17473322
>how much $AUD should I pay for a 2007 Submariner 14060M with box and papers at auction?
>
>bretty sure the reserve price is between $11,750 and $12,500.
>
>all values in australian bucks

anyone?

>>17473691
>after that you just stop seeing the tourbillion
It's not a tourbillon lmfao.

Roast me

>>17473723
>MTWTFSS

Is that one of those $37 mechanical watches from some chinese hell factory I keep seeing promoted on Amazon?

>>17473731
Anything more than $8000 is just retarded

>>17473734
yes, just check aliexpress there's thousands of them and they all look amazing compared to anything swiss

>>17473731
Depends on the condition. Saying X is the correct price for a used watch can't be done without evaluating the condition.

Two otherwise-identical watches from the same year will command very different prices if one is in factory-sealed condition and the other was worn by a fat person.

>>17473735
USD or AUD?

>>17473725
And a flathead Ford will will work the pistons with 1 head removed. Dumb tricks gets old faster than you think. Not everyone is an autist and want to know more about your oriental watch with a weird circle on it.

>>17473721
Hold on, it's not the BEST CHART, but I did saved the Chesterton. Not the anon you replied to btw.

>>17473738
it's listed as "very good" condition

>>17473736
Do they look amazing up close or just in the photoshopped scam store?

>polo ralph lauren watches are swiss made, 72 hour power reserve, +2 -3
wtf

>>17473744
no theyre legit, ive got loads of handsome chinese alibaba shitters

>>17473744
Aliexpress = total scam
At least keep it to ebay

>>17473743
>it's listed as "very good" condition
That's kind of meaningless, like a guy on a dating app saying he's "about 6 feet" or a girl describing herself as "curvy".

>>17473747
how is it a scam? ive spent thousands there and never been scammed

>>17473747
No dude I see it on amazon too. Go there and search for something fairly obvious like "Timex Automatic" and half the results are sponsored, amazon's choice, and trending styles that are in no way related to your original search. Looks like some convincing replicas but some are skeletonized gold automatics that are hideous but still just like $30

Pic semi related what came up for "timex automatic"

>>17473733
The biggest roast is that no one cares.

>>17473745
Sometimes fashion brands decide to get into watches but they put effort into it.

>>17473744
They have shit QC and they have incredibbly shitty random non-word names, but other than that if they had good QC they could cost anywhere from $1500 to $150k with a Swiss brand name.

I HATE OMEGA SO MUCH I FUCKING HATE IT IT RUINED MY FUCKING LIFE I HATE OMEGA AND OMEGA WEARERS I HATE EM

>>17473793
Where did the Omega guy touch you?

>>17473804
It's a fucking fake Rolex brand like Tudor it's for losers I HATE OMEGA I HATE OMEGAYS GET EM OUT

>>17473805
I can only asume the Omega guy went full rape in you. Ouch.

>>17473829
JUST fuck your shit up stupid ass tupoor omegay wearer HAHAHAHA i bet you have a "seamaster" seaman master boy hahahah JUST JUST JUST JUST

picrel is the greatest and best watch
all else is cope

I've lost my trusty marathon field watch. What should I replace it with?
I'm looking for a beater, smaller size (35mm tops) possibly light dial, and good lume (or tritium tubes, even better).
I'll be working with it around the workshop all week and taking it hiking and sailing most weekends.
Quartz or automatic, I don't care, as long as it's no more than 3-400$.
I don't like cathedral hands, that's a deal breaker. Who said beggars can't be choosers?

I'm looking to buy my first watch and I'm not fashionable.
I can't decide between the silver casio a700 and the casio a168 gunmetal (with negative display). Advice? or possibly other suggestions.

>>17473907
>>17473904

>>17473907
Thats an attractive field watch if thats actual tritium. Why not just get another?

>>17473907
>lost my trusty marathon field watch
How did you lost it? Did your wife's bull took it away?

>>17473911
I'm not so hot on digital, otherwise that would be a good choice
>>17473912
Just looking for a change I guess, and a light color dial
>>17473937
Sorry I don't quite follow

>>17473937
>did you lost it?
ESL begone.

>>17473670
Hello watch anons, I'm hoping you can recommend 2 watches for me.
>$700 per watch
>Dress watch
>No movement preference
>One gold face, one with silver/stainless steel face
>Simple face, no subdials
>Leather strap
>Wrist is 6.5 inches/17cm
I know absolutely nothing about watches desu, so I'm really relying on your recommendations to get started.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfHkUELgFQ8

Got this beauty today.
A refurbished HMT

>>17473984
Look at the Swatch group and see what brands they offer in that range. Hamilton, Mido, Tissot, and a few others. There’s also Frédérique Constant. Zeppelin too. Hamilton Jazzmaster or Tissot Gentleman maybe. Strap shouldn’t matter because you can change them anytime

>>17473984
>>17474035
Also in my opinion anything above $500 should be automatic movement. A quartz should be no more than $500

>>17474035
>>17474039
>>17473984
Oh yeah and I know it’s frowned upon by check out /r/watches on Reddit and search for some brand names you like to see what others are saying about them.

>>17474039
Junghans form c

>>17474016
>Bombay special

>>17473697
Frenchfag fatso

>>17473670
>This watch is shipped with a standard 110-mm-long strap. Due to state law, this product cannot be shipped to Delaware
DE niggas confirmed wristlets.

Gonna buy a watch so I can avoid interacting with my phone as much as possible. I look at screens to much. I need to disconnect. Gonna head by goodwill and see what their prices look like.

>>17474065
Casio F91 with NATO strap.

>>17474060
Butthurt autism

>>17473733
I'll roast the watch. The lugs are too small as is the lug width. It's not refined enough to work in gold color and there's not enough contrast. The day and date wheel could have been color coordinated.

>>17474049
Nah this ain't no Special, just a regular Bombay

>>17474044
Form A is better.

Do the watches of the World Leaders measure up? Which one is the most based?

Are Casio watches cringe?

I was thinking about buying two of the same watch one in gold and one in silver. I can get both for $100AUD off Facebook marketplace

t. watchless

>>17474149
forgot pics

>>17474147
That chart needs to be updated; Charles is now King.
Also,
>not having your head of state wear a shitter from a local microbrand

>>17473677
Seiko

does anyone wear tag huer

>>17474150
>gold casio
Boomer stuff, goes well with everything.

>>17473723

Was clearing out my demented grandmother's home and found an old watch my dead grandfather hadn't used in decades. Idk I was never much of a watch guy.

>>17474280
Would look nicer on a thick leather strap.

are there any homos tetra homages

What watch is this?

>>17474065
To much what?

>>17474147
Most based is Swiss, most cringe is Kim Jong un or Obama wtf. Also dalai lama has a 200k pocket watch? Buddhist monks are fucking scammers I thought it was about abstaining from luxury and material possessions.

>>17474256
>Boomer stuff
so is it cringe if I wear it as a 22yo male?

I just have a gold chain I've started wearing and I only have a garmin as a watch and want something to colour match

>>17474370
>something to colour match
snk366

>>17474370
>something to colour match
orient bambino gold

>>17474370
Yes, would look like you stole the watch from a boomer. As a 30 y/o "boomer" I wear a vostok amphibia, I first bought it when I was in the military but it grew on me so I started using a watch in civilian life too.
tldr: square casios are too boomer even for me but looks good

>>17474147
>Which one is the most based?
AMLO

wanna get a nice watch as a souvenir for my time in japan, around 500
any recs that are less available in the west?

>>17474391
You eon't find much for that kind of money. Maybe a Weekdater in good condition or some other interesting vintage Seiko.

Just added the Longines Flagship. Someday I'll buy a diver I promise. (I will never buy a dive watch).

Next up is a vintage Vulcain Cricket, preferably early 60s, unfortunately the word is out on them and prices have gone through the roof in the last 5 years.

>>17474249
Yes, the gays that don't like Homos do.

>>17474339
Casio

>>17474347
>Also dalai lama has a 200k pocket watch? Buddhist monks are fucking scammers I thought it was about abstaining from luxury and material possessions.
It was a gift.

>>17474395
Man i wish they'd keep the indices from the SARB on the newer Cocktail times, looks so much better.

>>17474399
I actively dislike the new Cocktail Times, purely because of the Presage text.

The SARB065 is easily the watch that gets the most comments from people of the whole box.

>>17474147
The only one I would wear is Shinzo Abe's Seiko

>>17474391
Used in Japan tends to be in better condition than new in the West, can't tell what interesting stuff you might find because there is a factor of luck

>>17473999
Nigger

Since I've been wearing a "dress" watch as my full-time watch for the last five months, I've realized that so much that watch stat geeks sperg out over is pointless.

>muh power reserve of less than 3 days
wind your watch when you put it on in the morning. takes 10 seconds, tops.
>muh lume
i've yet to need to tell time and not have some source of light available
>muh sub-300m water resistance
I've splashed it in the sink, I've gotten caught in the rain, it's been fine. When I go diving, I wear an actual dive computer.
>muh cosc-certification
turns out, I don't care if my watch is +/- 2 seconds per day or +/- 5 seconds. It's close enough and the dial doesn't have gradations for seconds so I can't tell anyway.

What I have, instead, is a watch that is extremely lightweight and comfortable, not some boomercore Bond-LARP dive watch.

>>17474249
Yes

Hey /wt/, I'm looking for a "breakfast watch". Something I can in the mornings and evenings when I'm in my leisure clothing. Basically a watch I can wear to signify that it's time to relax.
>Prefer 38mm, max 40mm
>versatile colors
>Budget: $200
This can be something silly. I was looking at the Timex x Peanuts collection for example. Let me know your thoughts.

>>17474443
see >>17474396

>>17474444

>>17474446
Fucking based

>>17474439
You make good points.

To add to that, dress watches are great value on the used market, especially in precious metals. You can get a gold watch or something with an interesting complication for the price of a steel sports watch.

>>17474439
>after being a watch sperg and actually buying something I realized spergs are retards
Welcome to 4chan. Wait until you realize thats true for every other board. k's gun autism, o's aspergers regarding cars, ck's retardation over eating food, out being hippy morons about being outside. Pick a board and realize spergs make big todo's over nothing because what the fuck would socially retarded people talk about?

>>17474370
Casio digitals seem perfect for a young man.
I wish I'd been into watches earlier.

>>17474435

>>17474439
99% of the time picrel is all you need.
Lightweight, durable, easy to read, slick looking.

>>17474454
Does the chrome plating flake off the plastic watch easily? Or is that a metal watch case?

>>17474460
It's a plastic watch body with a faux chrome plating.
I've had mine for like five years.
It's completely fine.
The finish scratches over time, but that's just normal wear and tear.
The only time I've seen the finish come off is with a guy who wears his while working on his car.
He's way harder on his watch than I am.
Fortunately, these things are only like $25, so it's not like it's hard to replace.
If you're wearing it in a non-machine shop setting, it will be fine for a very long time.

>>17474403
The text doesn't bother me (i have the blur moon) but the proportions are better on the sarb, the dial looks bigger. The sarb is a bit thick though.

>>17474489
>If you don't expose your watch to harder wear and tear, it'll be fine!
Yeah I guess. I accidentally scratched one of my inexpensive casios that is no longer made and all I see now is a giant scratch on it. Got it while wearing a suit and tie unfortunately.

Is there a watch similar to this (simple and elegant, light dial, full lume) but quartz?

>>17473907
Check out Baltany on aliexpress

>>17474537
yeah, timex and casio has very similar stuff. The hard part is decent lume since i've blasted a watch in the sunlight or with flashlights and its readable in a dark closet for a solid 2 minutes. Great, its then useless in absolute dark. Don't let a useless feature like lume be a dealbreaker. Timex Waterbury might be what you're looking for, you just have to find a style you like then seek out the light or white dial. Keep in mind too, if you're in the <$50 range, you may have to swap out a band if you like the watch but the band is a bracelet or a cheap leather one.

>>17474439
Same. I have a Reverso for everyday wear (I can quickly pop it on a nice alligator strap if I want to dress it up) and a Garmin as a fitness tracker (or if I'm going into an area with undesirables).

I really don't think I need anything else.

>>17474542
I wish that I didn't care about lume, but I end up just not wearing watches without it. I need it, on any watch, because I always want to be able to tell the time at night, without getting to my phone. If I'm out and I'm also sleeping out, I don't want to have to carry two watches.
Also, I'm not sure the watch you posted has lumed indices

>>17474035
>>17474044
I appreciate the recommendations anons, I'll start looking through them and see what I can find.

>>17474557
That specific Casio doesn't have lumed indices, mostly because as an adult I can still tell the time on my wrist without any indices even in broad daylight. You just look at the hands. You cannot deny lume is fully useless if you're in the dark longer than 10 minutes so demanding lumed indices and hands and whatever else is kinda dumb.

Its why I suggested the Timex Waterbury. (Or any timex really) Some have lumed hands and indices but they still have indiglo on all of their watches. Its still the very best way of reading the time in actual dark. It doesn't ruin your night vision, its not like pulling out a flashlight or phone, and it just works well. I went to snap you a pic but my Waterbury battery is low enough to keep time but when I push the crown for indiglo the watch stops only to resume again after releasing the indiglo. Time to buy a case knife and replace the battery I guess.

>>17474581
>You cannot deny lume is fully useless if you're in the dark longer than 10 minutes
You do know lume that isn't casio lume lasts for hours, right?

Anyone have any experience with the Steeldive 1970 Captain Willard watch? Is it any good?

>>17474588
There's definitely an anon here who has a steeldive turtle, idk if it's that exact one.

>>17474581
In actual darkness, where you can't make out the case of the watch, just lumed hands are not enough to tell the time, you also need lumed indices. Lumed hands provide one information only, i.e., the angle between the hands, which doesn't have a one-to-one correspondence with the time.

>Timex Waterbury
That looks decent, thanks. I'm positively surprised by the fact that it's 38 mm. But I would have preferred no numerals

>>17474347
Dalai Lama's watch collection is worth $500,000 btw. He's got a lot of gifts over the years and he's interested in tinkering with them.

https://www.wristenthusiast.com/latest/2022/3/22/dalai-lama-watch-collection

>white, black with a touch of red
Literally nothing better for color schemes.

>>17474587
I don't believe you. Not something that isn't tritium or hasn't been outside in broad daylight for a long time.

>>17474598
The Waterbury stuff is a varied "collection" under Timex. Its everythign from $600 automatics to $50 quartz with indiglo. Head to timex's website and just look at them all, I saw a few without numerals. Again, indiglo is they very best way to tell the time in absolute darkness.

But no, you don't need indices to tell the time. The minimalistic watches that don't have them still work. You can still tell the time without indices, just say you like them and want them to show up on a watch because autism. Also, indiglo is usually blocked by indices and other markings on timex stuff so you'll have those as a "negative" when indiglo is used.

>>17474598
Here, timex Fairfield. Only downsides are no date window and its 41mm. Other than that it has no numerals, indiglo works in zero light on demand, and timexes are known to be durable. Enjoy that loud tick at night too.

Just placed an order. r8

>>17474616
>timexes are known to be durable.
Mine broke in a month, started being off by an hour or two at a time (minutes were still right) and the second hand would follow the tilt of the watch.
>Enjoy that loud tick at night tn xoo.
Mine wasn't very loud. Maybe I got a fake? I sent it back to Amazog for a replacement, how do i know if it's legit?

>>17474621
Amogus

Thinking about bringing my GS GMT as my only travel watch to the Caribbean. Even though it's rated at 100m WR I still feel weird swimming with a non-diving watch. Anyway feel the same?

>>17474627
No idea but they've been making watches since 1854 and "takes a licking, keeps on ticking" has been attributed to them. My Waterbury above that needs a battery is about 8 years old now. Sounds like either you got a fake, a lemon, or its been abused. Because a seconds hand following the tile means something is very broken inside. And yeah, everyone who's owned a timex knows they're loud unless they're deaf.

>>17474638
I would occasionally bump it into metal shelves, which is obviously bad, but it was never especially hard. I really liked the way it looked and felt, and the indiglo was cool, but I am surprised by how fragile it was.

Sheesh. Looking fire.

>>17474660
All are shit except the AP and rolexes there

>>17474506
Sometimes bad accidents happen.
That's one of the reasons why I like the A158.
If anything catastrophic happens to it, you can pick up another one.
I do normal cooking and yard work with mine and it's fine.
Sorry to hear about the one that's no longer produced, though.
That does suck.

>>17474543
Based.

>>17473745
i like their bear watches

>>17474694
W2C

Casio Duro is like my go to atm
I have a casio royale too but I hardly ever wear it

I have got a few watches off aliexpress too, two steeldive automatics and a pagani design daytona each less than $100

Unless I was getting a Rolex or Omega as an investment piece I would find it very difficult convincing myself of spending more than £100 on a watch now.

>>17474718
their website
https://www.ralphlauren.com/brands-polo-ralph-lauren-men-polo-bear-watch-cg

>>17474317
so, uh, what's he wearing there?

>>17474395
nice Dupont lighter

Thoughts on the Santos?

>>17474444
checked

>>17474637
Not at all - if anything, it's weird that there are so many anglerfish hunters among the watch community

>>17474762
Fine for an only watch, but if it's part of a collection, then it's a weird in-betweener: too sporty to be a dress watch, to dressy to be a sports watch.

If you're looking at buying a Datejust, the Santos is something to consider as well.

>>17474666
My thoughts as well, Tom Brady (without the Tag Heuer) mogs

>>17474444
Mr Jones watches are tailor made for that kind of thing.

>>17474726
I wanted a Pagani until I remembered every conversation about it would end with "it's a chink copy I got off Aliexpress"

What's the best ~38mm chrono with a 12 hour subregister? I'm thinking either the previous gen Speedmaster '57 or a Zenith A384 but I wanna know what I'm missing.

>>17474774
I am attracted to the Santos due to the history of it as well, my main use would be in suit and tie events.

>>17474762
I want to buy a fake Cartier Santos for some kind of George Santos joke but I don't know how to make it actually funny

>>17474794
>my main use would be in suit and tie events.
The good thing about the Santos is that the system for swapping the bracelet with a strap is tool-free and takes seconds.

When you buy one, it normally comes with a brown calfskin strap (which actually looks really good) but you can swap it out with any other strap at the boutique. On a black gatorskin strap it looks very sharp.

Then, when you want to go back to normal, casual wear, you can snap the bracelet back on.

>>17473730
>>17473734
Sometimes I think the Chinks obey an esoteric rulebook whereby they deliberately ruin otherwise OK products by doing shit like this in order to justify the low price tag.

>>17474826
They are obsessed with wealth signaling

>>17474729
Thanks

>>17474792
I'd get the speedy '57 to be honest.

>>17474608
>But no, you don't need indices to tell the time
That's not what I said

>The minimalistic watches that don't have them still work
They work because you can see the case, and in particular the lugs or the crown, which tell you where the 12 and 6 and 3 and 9 are. If you can't see the case because it's dark, you can't tell the time.

>just say you like them and want them to show up on a watch because autism
This has nothing to do with autism, it actually happened several times that I wasn't able to tell what time it was during the night with lumed hands only

>>17474861
Yeah I had the Zenith as my preferred wristlet chrono but I'd forgotten about that Speedy '57 until recently. Shame because prices have shot up, maybe hype from the bicompax version.

>>17473731
how pathetic are you to need validation so bad you buy a shitty boring baby's first rolex to impress people you dont know? you cant actually like the way this piece of shit looks otherwise you'd have bought literally a million different offerings that look exactly the same.
youre a retard and people will NOT be impressed. its the same behavior as beaners who buy 15 year old BMWs so people will think theyre rich cuz it says "BMW"

>>17474390
based reloj del bienestar.

>>17474889
>t. poor cunt

>>17474889
Based.

>>17474889
Eternally based
>>17474911
If you have money either get something fun, actually nice or something under the radar

>>17474427
Japan "Used/Damaged" is wests "new".

If you got an audience with Dalai Lama and asked for his watch, do you think he'd give it to you?

>>17474992
If it has a scratch, they give YOU the money while profusely apologizing in a 90 degree bow

>>17475004
I bought a thing in a cardboard box. You know on places where cardboard is bending to make a box, it can with time and use lose the shiny printed top surface and show white cardboard inside? Like 1mm thin strip along top box lid.

That was "Used/Damaged" The insides were never unpacked.

>>17475011
Holy shit
>Meanwhile, my mailman:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YrpmZFixp0

Is there some website with images of different watch models?

>>17475019
I know it's a bit risky, but I like to buy watches by only looking at their serial numbers - keeps me and the missus sharp.

https://watchbase.com/

>>17475022
Thanks cuz

>>17474889
Just for clarification I wasn't seeking "approval" I just wanted to get the opinion of some anons on whether the price was right.

I'm going to get a sub one way or another whether it be this one or not.

Ended up losing the auction anyways. It went for $11,750+20% buyers premium. I felt it was only worth around $11,000.

>>17475018
Kek

>>17475019
Yes, the internets

>>17474762
Is there any santos homage from pagani, san martin, etc.?

>>17475048
https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005003698474981.html

>>17474537
I found this, opinions? It kinda boring looking, I should see it in person

>Nine of the most beautiful chronograph movements ever made, according to Grand Prix Academy member and member also of the FHH, Haoming Wang.

Notice how there is no Lolex or Gay Sexko, but there is based Omega.

Can I get away with this being my only watch, at least for the foreseeable future? I plan to buy it from Japan. I want to cover more variety later on, but at the same time I'd rather not start with cheap shit from the get-go.

I need a watch that says "this guy's probably a billionaire but not the Wall Street kind". Any ideas?

>>17474557
Casio's Lineage series are simple, elegant, quartz and it has a light dial version. The lume is useless but it as an LED at 6 that is activated with one of the pushers.
However it's ana-digi with a small lcd display, so it might not be to your taste.

>>17475105
>I want to cover more variety later on, but at the same time I'd rather not start with cheap shit from the get-go.

I think this is a wise move however I am not the biggest fan of Grand Seiko. That's my personal preference.

>>17475127
>The lume is useless
I'd disagree. It's not a the best lume ever, but serviceable for 2 hours

>>17474537
SUR307

>>17474542
What's that casio? Looks like thst other watch with the huge date window that keeps getting reposted, but done right

>>17475068
Better question - how many years will it take to unfuck this style for watchfags after Daniel Wellington & company ruined it?

>>17475105
>Can I get away with this being my only watch, at least for the foreseeable future?
Yes, if you're gay.

>>17475118
The "b" makes it much more complicated, something rare, but goofy as shit because billionaires would be above signaling wealth the way millionaire plebs do (that watch that matches the color of your Bugatti for example)

Imagine if there was one single earliest Mickey Mouse watch left and it was 10 million dollars, that kind of thing

>tfw not flying for work tomorrow since I caught the coof
Honestly dying wouldn't be too bad imo

What are some cool Rolex batman alternatives that I can buy? Quick look only gives ssk003, and that is soso

>>17475127
Thanks, I know and like the Lineage series, but they are just too big for me. Actually, that very watch you posted would be my dream watch if it came in any size between 34 and 38 mm (and maybe with Oceanus-tier finishing). By the way, I can read casio's lume all the way through the night, even if it's very dim

>>17475136
>SUR307
Damn, for less than 200 that is quite good looking, thanks

>>17475145
Lol you're right. But I don't really care

>>17475105
>Can I get away with this being my only watch

yeah, kinda.
get other watches though.

>>17475127
tough solar is so fucking based. no more gay battery replacing. I posted my yellow casioak yesterday and I really love that feature. I've been thinking about getting a Lineage Casio but then again Multiband 6 is probably inferior to the new Bluetooth models by now. So they'll definitely push BT more than MB6. Having both seems overkill.

>>17475170
>get other watches though
>>17475148
>Yes, if you're gay

Feel free to suggest something in that price range that's better and not gay please. What is wrong with GS also? Is Swiss the way to go?

>>17475168
Timex Q GMT

>>17475118

>>17475172
For me, it's the fact that it is a Seiko. I know it's not the same as the budget line but still. They should've called it something different because there is a lot in a name.

>>17475168
I'd say Steinhart Ocean 39 GMT Premium 500... but I think they discontinued it last year.

>>17475127
yes.

>>17475179
>hey what time is it?
>fuck i don't know maybe 3, 12:36, or 10:09. Nobody fucking knows since I have 3 different times on my watch for no reason.

>>17475205
It's flex-o-time every second of the day

What's a decent poorfag Mecaquartz? Preferably no Chronograph. I covet that smooth, smooth sweep, yet my wallet runeth dry.

>>17475140
I can't find it but look for the Casio MTP. Several very similar variants out there.

>>17475140
>>17475212
Found it at MTP-1381L, but only with a leather band

>>17473677
Presage no contest.

>>17475219
>MTP-1381L
Not quite, slightly different dial. Not sure what thats called but its not the same.

I'm thinking based.

>>17474147
kek at the Dalai Lama flexing with his Patek.

It’s a full moon out tonight. Be careful out there, /fa/ggots.

>>17475226

>>17474147
>Watch with Assad face on it
Those other chumps never stood a chance.

>>17474147
Of course the sheikh is the one wearing a RM

>>17475205
One is local time, the other two are the times of the tax havens that he extensively used to become a billionaire

>>17473745
>>17474729
>>17474694
I genuinely want one.
Can't justify spending 2k Carboncredits on a meme, however...

>>17474439
What's the watch you've been wearing?

>>17475243
hot tip: time zones change by the hour, not random minutes.

>>17474660
>>17474147
where can I see more charts like this

>>17475226
Yeah the only problem is the "brand" name and that they keep throwing random shit on the watches. With more understated designs they'd be indistinguishable from Swiss companies.

>>17474660
>Everyone has a retarded nigger watch EXCEPT Tiger Woods.
Massive kek.
Pessi's Royal Oak and Brady's Milgauss are okay I guess.

>>17474726
>be average height
>have very much not average wrists
F-fuck divers!

>>17474395
Quantity<Quality in one photo.
Enjoy your junk.

>>17475226
You can not pull it off.

>>17474395
Do you really need 2 Fields and 4 tacky gold dress watches?

>>17475286
I bet you own more watches than him.

>>17474395
How's the Hamilton khaki like? Would you recommend it as a poorfag watch

in only a few days ill have had my Rolex for ONE YEAR exactly, ill make sure to make some pictures or it to show the wear it received in that time

>>17475299
Who the fuck cares retard, millions of people have the same watch, you can find hundreds of thousands of the exact same looking images of it on GIS in 0.5 seconds.

>>17474395
Oof ouch yikes and quack.

>>17475301
oh i dont care about your opinion

>>17475170
> Multiband 6 is probably inferior to the new Bluetooth models by now
If you're a weirdo like me and don't have a smartphone, multiband is great. When all of casio's lineup becomes dependent on BT, I'll be very sad.

>>17475305
Then why would you post your shitter folex on a southern American Hot Pocket enthusiast forum?

>>17475309
i do care about the opinion of the more relaxed, pleasant people here

>>17475305
Yeah that's why you're posting your generic shit here lmfao moron.

>>17475311
Friendo, you can't post a 90s BMW dashboard and a very dated discount entry level rolex wondering about pleasant people's opinions. You need a better hobby, if its even legal in yurope.

>>17475317
>a 90s BMW dashboard and a very dated discount entry level rolex
thats me alright

>You need a better hobby, if its even legal in yurope.
nothing is legal here, they are probably going to take away my 90s BMW too, soon enough

>>17475326
don't post your gyspy rolex or your gay 4th owner 30 year old bmw ever again.

>>17475299
No man with enough money to buy a Rolex and any sense would ever buy a Rolex. They're the Beats by Dr. Dre of watches. They even fail their primary function (to signal wealth) because fakes are so ubiquitous.

>>17475305
Are you perchance a Turk living in Germany?

>>17475297
The Khaki gets the most wear out of everything in there, and I've had it since 2016.

I'm of the firm opinion it's the best entry Swiss auto on the market. I have treated it very roughly and banged it all over the place, and no worries at all. My third day owning it I snagged it on the backstay of my sailboat and put a huge gouge in it from the stainless steel braided wire under high tension, popped the strap, and it fell 6 feet onto the deck and then into 35 feet of water. Fished it out, tossed a NATO onto it and kept sailing.

Sapphire sandwich, plenty of WR, legible dial with good lume. It also has just enough polish that you can wear it formally and it doesn't look insane.

I absolutely recommend it.

Which one and why?

>>17475295
I own less but more quality. One of my watches easily is worth more than that whole collection and more.

>>17475342
I dont know

>>17475342

Royal Oak. The others are copies.

guys, help me out: citizen nb1050, or nb1060?
white/silver dial.
my only other watches are a g-shock and a seiko prospex diver, and I want this watch to round up my collection for the next 3-5 years.

>>17475350
*fewer
Merely being rich doesn't automatically grant you superior aesthetic sensibilities. Have you ever heard of the term nouveaux riche?
Now you can either post your collection and prove me wrong, or fuck off.

>>17475342
I don't like any of them. I'd just get one of those recent really nice blue Grand Seikos and use the rest of the money for a lavish beachy vacation.

>>17475341
Thanks for your input, is yours automatic?

>>17474395
Not one single watch worth owning

>>17475293
I dont need any of these I have a cellphone. But roughly: the Tissot bumper for black leather, the Gold Longines for Brown, the Bulova Tank for Tuxedo, the Longines Flagship for really anything.

The other gold watch is a 60's soviet army issue Vostok, so really it's 3 field watches. The Seiko 5 being the first mechanical I ever owned.

I'm in a suit and tie for work every day, hence the heavy emphasis on dress watches.

>>17475369
Yep, the standard Khaki Field Auto.

>>17475342
Previos gen Overseas is god tier

>>17475342
the Patek. Plain but still attractive. I don't like the tumors on the left and right side but its better than the cancer on the AP and the fake bolts, and the Vacheron has too many indices making the dial look busy.

just ordered a new watch but I'm not excited to get it or wear it... feels bad man.

>>17475382
your brain is finally giving up the "I need to buy things to make me happy" dopamine nonsense. Find something that that actually makes you happy. Buying a new shiny thing that autists on /fa/ says are good aren't what make you happy. hobbies involve doing something or showing something of substance, a final product. Buying shit nobody knows or cares about isn't a hobby.

>>17475373
Okay. To be honest I'm just a bit salty because I fucking hate gold in any form, I can't shake the association with vacation street vendor garbage. A gold Rolex is about the most disgusting item I can imagine.

>>17475377
no. it's fat fuck tier.

>>17475382
Cancel the order, keep both your money and the purchase dopamine rush. Sorry brain, no refunds.

Are g shocks retarded? Can g shock fit any fit at all?

>>17475393
I feel exactly the same about modern gold watches, especially rolexes. Vintage seems to wear it better in my opinion. I picked up the Longines Flagship specifically to have a modern dress watch that wasn't gold.

Another thing to consider is I have a gold wedding band, and so I try to at least include some gold in all of my dress watches. The flagship using gold hands and indices makes the steel case less of a clash.

>>17475405
Gshocks are awesome.

>>17475395
>it's fat fuck tier
wat

>>17475467
lose some weight and you'll know, fattie.

>>17475439
hear hear, anon. this exact model is my daily. and I have an automatic for the weekends or whenever I go out.

>>17475293
Tacky how?

genuinely thinking about getting a rep of this ugly fuck, i feel like i could make some really fun fits with this as the centerpiece

>>17475377
Looks awful

>>17474390
When is he selling the plane lads?

>>17475364
No need to show my collection. Here's my recent purchase.

Stay jealous. Let it fuel you to try and catch up to me.

>>17475528
>That fake ass day and month aligment, and length of the hands
LOL, LMAO EVEN
Nice try, tho

>>17475569
Looks identical to me.

>>17475569
Omg! You called it a fake! Just because you cannot even afford anything by Patek. Your whole life is probably worth less than what's on my wrist right now.

I have the watch and you only have a photo. I bet my other watches that you've never even seen one in person. Unlike you, I can actually afford my watches and lifestyle; while you are just behind a screen, jerking off about Grand Seikos and other shitwatches.

>>17475581
Advanced shitposting.

>>17475577
See an optometrist. In most fake watches the date wheels are not exactly aligned because they're used with many different models/even "brands".

>>17475342
i like the vacheron dial but the ap bracelet more

>>17475577
Proof that people who need to cope with how broke they are need to call everything fake. Even though they have no fucking idea what they're talking about.

>>17473697

This is objectively one of the most disgusting watch I've ever seen. Nice job.

>>17475528
>filename
>MY recent purchase

>>17474382
>>17474386
>>17474389
how about this?

Anybody got a sinn? How do you like it?

Anyone know how to set the date on a vintage seiko mickey mouse watch? Needs a new battery and I can pull the crown and move the arms but no luck on calendar. Pictured is the model in question

>>17475619
Disney is pozzed shit why the fuck would you wear that

>>17475612
Your should remove that speck of dirt / malignant carcinoma from your index finger as soon as possible.
No comment on the watch.

>>17475629
It's from when Walt was alive and a nazi

>>17475619
>Mickey Mouse watch
Might as well tattoo 'I molest children' on your forehead.

>>17475641
Nevermind, carry on.

Am i here?

>>17475297
I have one and wear it the most. My other watches are dive, dress or beater casio. Nice enough for work, easy to read, reliable, not expensive. I swapped the stupid leather strap for a black and silver nato strap

>>17473677
Seiko looks better in person, because the dial looks more refined.

>>17473697
I remember you. I'm glad you're still here.

>>17473699
Yes. Depending on the model and how well you are acquainted with your AD, you can still get a good discount. Unfortunately, the discount will never be as steep as the dropoff that you will find on the grey market, as Aqua Terras aren't desirable.

>>17473723
Is this what Cartier ripped off?

>>17473731
Depends on the auction, desu. Good luck though; just do your due diligence and you should be fine.

>>17473733
It has the potential to look okay in person. In pics, the crown is awful and the date windows leave much to be desired. Otherwise, the handset and dial have nice proportions.

>>17473793
I'm sorry. I like them.

>>17474147
Doesn't really count, as most of them don't wear their best stuff when cameras are around.

>>17474149
No, they're fine. Some of their stuff is iconic.

>>17474395
Lovely collection, and I like your lighters too.

>>17474439
Yup. But comparing details between watches is how the industry functions, so it comes with the territory if you come to a board that discusses watches. Take Omega's Spirate system: does it matter? To some, it's a game changer, and to others, it's irrelevant because it'll never compare with a great HAQ. At least it gives people something to argue over.

>>17474545
You don't need either of those watches. They're happy luxuries. You may 'want' more though.

>>17474557
I like lume, but it's not a deal breaker. I have enough vintage stuff with lume that stops after 10 minutes that I'm used to it now. How do you feel about the old 'Indiglo'?

>>17474762
It was absurdly popular for about 8 months, and in person looks quite good. The bezel is a scratch magnet, but it hugs the wrist well. A nice shape, and different to what is out there without being too ugly. Have you tried one on?

>>17475077
>includes the 1863 but not the 321. What is he thinking?

>>17475528
All that money but can't you afford a nail trimmer?

>>17475105
Yup. It's quite accurate, but you may get bored of the colour scheme over time. If you get it used, it may be scratched and that might upset you.

>>17475118
Something by Roger Smith.

>>17475235
For sure...there be wolves a-howlin'.

>>17475299
Is it keeping good time? It's good that you're enjoying it.

>>17475342
I don't like them, and never did. The Patek has elephant ears, the Vacheron is ugly, and the AP is sadly not in yellow gold. Toss them all.

>>17475399
this

>>17475409
Don't worry about matching a wedding band; it's not expected, nor was it ever.

>>17475681
tardo
>>17475676
retardo

>>17475682
It's so quiet. What has happened?

>>17475686

New thread

>>17475692

>>17475692

>>17473697
Post some others 1000m divers that aren't that weird looking.
>No Rolex, please

>>17474783
this but also pic related

>>17474444
>watch I can wear to signify that it's time to relax
no watch

Is it gay to buy 36mm watch that's a female model? I have slim hands and having a 40mm watch would be cringe. Asking about the hamilton jazzmaster 36mm

>>17476309
no. wear what you like. 36 isn't even that small.

>>17475272
I made the chart myself but the original pics are from reddit.

https://old.reddit.com/r/Watches/search/?q=author%3AMorgenthau100&include_over_18=on&restrict_sr=on&t=all&sort=top

>>17476309
>Is it gay to buy 36mm watch that's a female model
No

but
>hamilton jazzmaster 36mm
is gay

>>17474147
If I was a world leader, I'd wear a Vostock for the lulz

>>17476309
Sometimes yes. Just make sure the lug width isn't tiny because that can make your watch look very feminine

>>17475105
When you first get it you might want to wear it everywhere and some would. but in my experience you realize how quickly it will get dinged up that way and save it for nice dinners, meetings, events, or just driving around town. Once I got a nice watch ironically I became more appreciative of it and more comfortable wearing a seiko 5 shitter around.

so yes, but maybe get a $100 shitter that you can wear a bit less cautiously

>>17473723
Another shitty chink cartier "homage"

1)
Are there similar watches to seikomatic weekdater ?
i love the elegant week window on top of 6 + the "modern" vintage look

2)
why does /wt/ don't like tudor ?

3) would you guys buy a manual winding watch ?
iam seeing the doxa jumbo lately and it's a nice watch actually but iam not sure about manual windings....