[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 838 KB, 622x938, Zrzut ekranu 2023-01-19 o 22.19.53.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17449027 No.17449027 [Reply] [Original]

Recommend me a better watch in this price range.

>> No.17449147

>>17449027
Probably some Speedy variation or a Tudor Black Bay?

>> No.17449426

>>17449027
The thing that pops out in my mind is something like a Grand Seiko SBGA461, the stainless steel diver with the spring drive movement. I’m not entirely certain what you mean by “better,” but the movement is certainly better in the GS. The water resistance is less, but I doubt you’re using it for diving. The GS is has a thinner case. Other than that most other features between the two are very similar. Retail for the GS is about 6,100 USD.

>> No.17449560

>>17449027
ymmv, but i have a Planet Ocean and i've had some problems with it--one major common annoyance is the crown tube gets stripped easily and any watchmaker you send it to will want to charge you for a complete service. i do like the watch though--i have the 46mm version
i also have a Ti Tudor Pelagos, 40mm i believe, not the newer 39. i like this watch a lot.
for a little more money just get a Submariner. you won't regret it

>> No.17449564
File: 1.97 MB, 4032x3024, IMG_2607.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17449564

>>17449560

>> No.17449869

>>17449564
>when you want your relatives to think that you have only one watch, as all normies do

>> No.17449871

>>17449560
Nigga how the fuck are going to say “a little more money to get a submariner?” The retail for a planet ocean is mid 6k and you can actually get it for that price. You aren’t going to get a submariner for less than double that amount. If you buy regularly from a boutique or something and the guy will actually hold one for you that’s a different story, but most people don’t have that luxury. I love subs dude but that suggestion makes no sense.

>> No.17449996

>>17449027
Any Rolex.

>> No.17450008

>>17449027
sbgj237, you're welcome

>> No.17450453

>>17449996
>in this price range

>> No.17450460
File: 24 KB, 600x435, 5b6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17450460

How abouf

>> No.17450550
File: 205 KB, 780x974, Rolex.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17450550

>>17449996

>> No.17450603

>>17449027
Tell me what you're looking for in a watch and I'll give you at least 2-3 alternatives.

>> No.17450686

Pick your Sinn

>> No.17452461

>>17449869
kek

>> No.17452506
File: 205 KB, 1255x600, tissot-prx-35mm-quartz-t1372101103100_227872_293269.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17452506

>>17450603
I want a basic everyday watch with a steel bracelet and a white or grey dial that matches with everything and that I can wear every day. Sapphire crystal decent water resistance and I want it to be somewhat small and vintage looking, preferably from a heritage brand, max price 500 dollars rec me 2 or 3 alternatives for the quartz prx 35mm.

>> No.17452627

>>17449027
it's a great watch op but it's big, you need decent wrists for it
make sure to try in person if you're considering purchase online

>> No.17452884
File: 735 KB, 5044x3363, dk0i9p38git51.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17452884

>>17452506
Seiko Dolce SADL011

Solar, sapphire, 36mm, 7.1mm thick.

>> No.17452890

>>17452884
hnnnnnng

>> No.17453431

>>17449027
Thats the watch that British Prince William wears exclusively

>> No.17453443

>>17449564
Why do people like divers? I get it if you actually do a lot of scuba diving, or even sailing or fishing or whatever, but for everyday wear? I think they are so ugly. The fat, oversized bezels, the offputting mix of triangles, rectangles and dots for indices, the squashed stubby hands, the usually clunky looking cases...

>> No.17453520

>>17453443
>Why do people like divers?
because or the Submariner being worn by James Bond and tons of real life celebrities in the 60s

>> No.17453524

>>17453431
Im pretty sure he wears a regular Seamaster not a Planet Ocean

>> No.17453553

>>17453443
This
They look like pure fucking shit and these consoomdrones line up to get fucked by them lmfao

>> No.17453589

>>17453443
if you are fit and tan and dress in a sporty casual way it looks good

if you're skinnyfat and pasty and wear cheap suits and try to look like le classy timeless gentlesir you don't

>> No.17453612

This is not the watch thread
>>17451535
>>17451535
>>17451535

>> No.17453620

>>17453443
I don't like them either and I agree with all your points.

>>17452884
This on the other hand I do like.

>> No.17453744

>>17449027
Samsung galaxy watch 5 pro. I'm willing to bet that "omega" chink shit doesn't even track your blood pressure.

>> No.17453757

Divelarp - various gaudy luxury shitters the size of a medium frisbee, 6k average, 12k if it’s memex. Spergouts and screeching over movements and rotor finishing.

North Sea saturation divers - Scurfa quartz for 250 quid

>> No.17453760

>>17449027
Santos dumont absolutely shits on this generic box store shitter that looks indistinguishable from a watch a child can buy at Walmart for $15.

>> No.17453766 [DELETED] 

Sage

>> No.17453778

>>17449027
Your phone.
>2023
>Wearing a watch

>> No.17454246
File: 134 KB, 640x640, 52a31597e5f893376b31389746dd88ac.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17454246

>>17453778
>have to reach into your pocket every time you want to know the time

>> No.17454253
File: 5 KB, 240x240, pepe-apu-cringe-face-side-teeth.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17454253

>>17450550
>non-Rolex haver has gay porn on his computer