/fa/ - Fashion

First for best post

https://youtu.be/kvpwffywJO0

>>17440401
Cope if you must and you will

watchbros give me some funky shit, i need a new piece ~$500, no divers, no boomer dress watches, thanks

Jelly doughtnuts :3

Evening big boys.

>>17440417
I swear this thing changes every time I see.

are replica watches worth getting?

obviously there are things to consider such as
>boonkd movements
>no resell value
>lower quality metals/gemstones
>lesser likelihood of servicing/repair

but i was wondering if these groups were being legit when some of these watches contained certain movements ie skeleton royal oak containing a "Swiss Caliber 3132 Movement" aka rolex movement

to my unappreciative monkey brain, if the watch winds itself with the movement, its fine by me. but i dont think id go for a fake skeleton ap just cause its unbelievable for a little shit uni student to own such a watch.
if anything, id probably opt for a lowkey omega/rolex, as its not as crazy for a uni cunt to own one'a doze.

if you ever ordered a replica watch, what's your experience with it

>>17440467
Good replicas will use well known and serviceable movements, so servicing might not be that big of an issue. But if you damaged the glass or needed to replace the bezel or band, that's where you'd run into some issues.

If I'm on $52k per year, would it be insane to buy a $4k watch?

If I'm on $52k per year, would it be insane to buy a $4k watch? With the assumption that it's an old watch I've coveted for some time and is my personal grail.

>>17440438
lol

>>17440491
>would it be insane
no. it's not like you're spending 4k every year or per watch.

>>17440438

>>17440491
You only live once and auccess should be measured by how much fun you have, not if you make good financial decisions. I'm not saying don't aim to make money and waste it at every turn, but to never do something stupid with your money is in itself stupid.

>>17440467
>are replica watches worth getting?
No. Never.

>>17440505
>no. it's not like you're spending 4k every year or per watch.
>>17440507
>You only live once and auccess should be measured by how much fun you have, not if you make good financial decisions. I'm not saying don't aim to make money and waste it at every turn, but to never do something stupid with your money is in itself stupid.
Thanks friends. It's one I've wanted since I was a kid and saw it in a movie, so I've always wanted it. It'd pretty much be the watch I'd wear every chance I get but I wasn't sure if it would be ridiculous to do it on a pretty low income.

>>17440529
Which watch is it?

>>17440533
A Hublot Big Bang yellow gold and black ceramic.

>>17440534
I know that watch people love to hate hublot but I love how stupid the big bang is. I want the clear one.

>>17440536
The only thing they did that I like was the watch made of concrete. Expensive as fuck though.

>>17440542
That's pretty cool

Forgot to post it

>>17440548
I think it's very cool, but almost $19k USD? Are you kidding? A meme watch like that I would have guessed at like 7 or 8k tops.

>

>>17440641
RIP in pieces.

>>17440491
I mean, yeah it’s kind of silly. You’ll be fine though, hopefully you are getting something that holds value so you can always sell it if it comes to it.

Hey guys, what’s a good watch for 2 - 5k that both normies and watch nerds would think is cool? Something used/older is fine and probably preferred

Are dHgate fake rolexes worth it? Or is it better just to go seiko?

>>17440653
If you want something that looks like a Rolex for cheap get a Pagani Design

>>17440649
How about just getting something YOU want instead of having the internet dictate your preferences

>>17440645
It's worth about half what its RRP was about 30 years ago, so it's not terrible I suppose. I have no plans on ever selling it however so the value isn't important to me at all.

>>17440660
What is it already?

>>17440654
Thanks they're pretty nice! May order one soon!

>>17440659
Just curious if people had ideas off their head. I would never buy anything I didn’t personally like or enjoy

Why is this place so filled with undeserved anger all the time?

>>17440679
Idk but I'm stealing that picture, fuck you

>>17440688
Fuck you too, anon. Fuck you too and good night.

another day of wagin
another day of cagin

>>17440728
I kind of liked the PRX at first but every time I look at it closer the less I like it. That's not to say that I think it's bad, but it isn't quite the watch that I hoped it would be.

>>17440736
it was the opposite for me. Pics didnt do anything for me but when i saw the waffle dial in person i was sold

>>17440736
I'm waiting for the powermatic 35mm PRX to come out. Then I'll bite.

Anyone got a link to an archive of the guy who wore his Breitling on his penisballs

>>17440750
That's gay, anon. Are you gay? What would our lord and savior, Jesus H. Christ say?

>>17440753
Ok newfag but has anyone else got the picture or what model it is

>>17440737
I hate that the waffle only comes on the autos.

>>17440759

>>17440466
Take your meds schizo

>>17440466
There's like 5 of them going around.

>>17440750
how can he tell the time, isn't his penis in the way?

>>17440795
This question and more can be answered when someone finds the post. I remember it being in /wt/

What are the G-shocks I can get that are closest to their vintage counterparts? DW-6900 is spot on and still gives vintage vibes. Any other ones I should take note of?

>Why yes, I switched a rolex for a casio, how could you tell?

>>17440815
I don't know maybe the original fucking square? The g9000 is the original mudman made for rally drivers

How versatile is this in terms of what occasion I can wear it for?

>>17440870
Just get the A700 on mesh. The AE1200 Isn't that versatile.

>>17440871
That's kinda unisex tho isn't it? I'm pretty sure one of my female colleagues has that one.

>>17440872
It is unisex but it's more versatile than the AE1200 by a lot.

Rolex doesn't want to sell me watches, unbelievable

>>17440874
Thanks for the tip bro, I'll think about getting it.

Shell cordovan strap.
Yea or Nay?

Rate my collection.

I freakin' looove watches btw.

>>17440688
It's from the movie "Memoirs of an Invisible Man"

>>17440961
>Shell cordovan strap.
>Yea or Nay?
Yea. They look good, they're durable, they can easily switch up between dressy or casual.

>>17440996
I like those little statues are they meant for watches?

>>17441003
I guess I need to go on reddit more I didn't know you could buy funko pops for your watches

Morning gents

https://youtu.be/b74CmRlzQZ4

>>17440649
Tissot gentleman w 18kt gold. It’s like $1500 bucks & to me looks great. Decent eta movement, & not rolled or plated but legit 18kt gold bezel. Not gunna lie I have a pretty serious watch collection but if I was on a budget or just starting out I’d absolutely get it, just recommend it to a coworker yesterday. If you wanna go more $$$ say 3-5k go tudor 1000%.

>>17440996
I want to believe the 5 high-end ones aren't fake. Nice collection. Whose is it, really?

>>17441013
I wanted to buy one, but those things are ridiculously overpriced. Like $300 overpriced.

Is he officialy /ourguy/ bros?

How do you pair watches with shoes?
If, for example, I'm wearing brown loafers, do I have to wear a brown strap too? Does it matter if it's not the same shade?
THNKS

>>17441206
I don't like shakira, but I don't like casio either
both are shit

>>17441211
>I don’t like quality, value packed watches and I am autistic

Fixed. Now fuck off.

>>17440817
based

>>17441209
Ideally you shoud always match your leathers and metals. Do you absolutely have to? Nah.

>divers
Is there any other type of watch, which is that overused, oversaturated and in general a larp magnet?

kinda sounds like yer mum

>>17440996
What's that polar bear holding? Seiko mod?

>>17441269
Sure, any minimalist watch.

>>17440996
lmao @ that goyard box

>>17441322
still want a junghans though...

>>17441269
pilot watches, field watches, racing chronographs

omega

>>17441320
Looks like a Zodiac

>>17441322
Hmmm I rarely see minimalism. Its either flashy divers or smartwaches.
>>17441408
Pilots - that I'll give it to you, second after divers larp for sure.

>>17441442
one of the omegas i actually like

>>17440817
Based dude, can't believe that /wt/ morons don't talk about this recent scandal

>>17441554
couldnt find a vid in english about it. can you give me the run down?

>>17441037
imagine spending $1500 on a tissot

>>17441561
>Pique is a known douche, is Shakira's young boyfriend and has a copuple of kids with her
>Pique cheats with some 23yo girl thqt works for him, he brings her to their house,shakira knows someone is getting into her house because her marmalade is disappearing from her feidge and Pique dislikes that marmalade.
>they break, cheating was confirmed
>Shakira makes some song about the relationship
>Then she makes another song and this time she throws real shit to Pique and her younger lover
>lyrics say he switched a Rolex for a casio, a ferrari for a twingo

>>17441119
It's a reddit collection,pretry rare because it is not the average collection that contains every "watch a collector must have" and shows a good amount of personality, making it a true collection rather than a youtube review based purchase list.

>>17441572
literally nonsensical kayfabe celeb drama no one but unironic retards cares about

>>17440996
This looks like the display at some asian flea market.

>>17441572
who cares?

>>17441572
>all this autism about someone choosing a casio over a rolex

>>17441636
the vast majority of the watches in that image (basically all the ones not in the goyard box) belong in an asian flea market, so it fits.

>>17441013
One magnifier not enough?

>>17440491
People will just assume you live with your parents, like I'm doing now

>>17441723
Well I do, but it's because my country is seriously expensive, as is my city. Nobody can move out before 30 here and even that isn't that realistic either unless you're dating someone that is also working full time.

>>17440649
you got to give us more, you looking for a oversized sports watch, classicly sized elegant watch etc? what would work on you as a person?

>>17440649
Any old and cheap Rolex. Some of the shittier undesirable models are really cheap used but people would just see Rolex on the dial and assume it's much more expensive.

>>17440996
Very cool, I like it!

>>17441037
what a fucking retard holy shit

>>17441581
>>17441648
>>17441650

R.E.T.A.R.D.S

>>17441206
>It's /ourguy/ ?

Yes it is, fuck you all if not

>>17440401
Non-screw down crown :^)

>>17441751
that’s a mighty complex word coming from someone who cares about tabloid drama

>>17441763
>Rolex AD cock sucker

Kys brown tranny

Can I wear my Rolex bowling? It’s not like golf right?

>>17441769
who are you quoting?

>>17440649
Datejust. Get a slightly more unique dial like linen or tapestry

>>17441772
If you want to be with Shakira, sure
>>17441773
(((You)))>>17441773

>>17441783
obsessed with washed up c list celebrities in a watch thread of all places

>>17440401
>plastic escapement
>hammy
>faux patina
Most NPC watch I've seen in my life

>>17441735
>Some of the shittier undesirable models are really cheap used
No they're not.

Is it sad that I only want to have one watch and it would be a used, quartz swiss shitter

>>17441799
what one

>>17441793

>>17441809
>2.5k for a tiny women's piece of junk from someone's garage sale
>really cheap
Ok retard.

>>17441822
>2.5k isn't cheap
Let me know you're a poorfag without saying you're a poorfag. I also set a filter for mens watches, so that doesn't even include the far cheaper womens variants.

>>17441822
>blatantly are mens watches and even say mens

>>17441828
>>17441831
Now tell us the size "men" :)

>>17441834
Anywhere from 36mm to 40mm, any bigger than that is weird for anything that isn't a diver anyway.

>>17441822
Cheap is a relative term. 2.5k for a Rolex is cheap

>>17441822
>>17441834
>moving the goalposts because he was wrong

>>17441843
>>Anywhere from 36mm to 40mm
None of those is even 39 fuck off lying retard.

>>17441848
Do you also wear men's pink panties?

>>17441849
>>17441852
You do realize I said from the start that undesirable models were cheap, right? I don't get why you're pissed off at small undesirable models being cheap.

>>17441793
>>17441822
>>17441834
>they're not cheap!
>ok they're cheap but they're womens!
>ok they're not womens but they're small!
fucktard.

>>17441864
You didn't say small and unfit to wear, and they're not cheap.

If you could get a normal 39mm Air King or Milgaus or some shit for $1k that would be "really cheap".

>>17441872
>You didn't say small and unfit to wear
Do you not know what "undesirable" means?

>>17441809
serious question how is this better than any modern entry level seiko?

>>17441877
It says Rolex on the dial are you fucking blind?

>>17441877
Brand name.

>>17441872
>small and unfit to wear
almost as if they'd be considered, idk, undesirable? lmao.

>>17441884
>>17441876
Undesirable and straight up trash are two different things. You can still marry an undesirable girl and have a happy life for example.

>>17441884
Watches can be (un)desirable for lots of reasons, not just its diameter.

>>17441717
poor mans rolly

>>17441877
Not how is it better, how much is it better? Is it 25-50x better than an entry level seiko? Unlikely

>>17441929
i would argue specs-wise it's not better at all
vintage watches like that even when serviced are not very accurate usually and their quality/materials/finishing doesn't hold up either, they were likely polished along he way too

Rate my watch.

>>17441939
Oh shit, sorry, Big ass image.

>>17441787
You fucking baboon, there's literally a lyric of Shakira comparing poorfags, Rolex (rich guys) to Casio (poor guys)

>>17440815
dw9052

>>17441939
gives me a headache just looking at this thing

I just bought myself a F-91W-1

>>17441912
lol ok

>>17441946
why does this matter and why do you care?

>>17441889
you're a special kind of stupid aren't you

>>17442015
I care and I pity you for being poor

Thinking about buying one of these new slim turtles to upgrade my SKX. Which color should I get?

>>17442121
The white dial looks best imo.

>>17440996
>That DBZ x Swatch collection
BASADO SEÑOR ANON

Can anyone ID what Gordon is wearing here?

>>17441877
>how is this better than any modern entry level seiko?
it says "Rolex" on it

>>17442118
sure, if that helps you to sleep at night

>>17440536
>>17440550
I love Hublot Big Bang and will probably end up owning one some day. I love big, gaudy, in your face designs
my dream watch is the IWC Big Pilot

>>17440417
i don't really understand what the point of posting it every single thread is. you've been doing this for over a year now? why?

>>17442161
Low effort bait that still gets replies?

>>17442163
uh huh. i guess i'm just getting too old for this site

>>17442165
I don't know why I even comback. /wt/ used to be alright 3 years ago but it's fucking useless now. This board is completely dead

Hell I dunno dick about watches

I love this idea but am 100% sure this is cheap toy bullshit. Is there a version of this that isn’t cheap toy bullshit?

Wat

>>17442180
forgot your pic dumbass

>>17442161
>Why post an image that keeps getting anon's feathers ruffled an entire year after originally seen.
Ye, I wonder too.

>>17442180
Le retarded

>>17442186
i'm asking because it doesn't rustle anyone anymore since we've all seen it a million times. you really think there are people coming to these threads for the first time? of course not. it's the same 5 people asking about watches they have no intention of buying
i dunno anon, i just think there's better ways to waste a life

what is your favourite russian watch?

>>17442184
>>17442189
Sorry, it's the Casio F91W

>>17442193
I had a Vostok Komandirskie that shit out on me but I loved it because it was my first mechanical watch
Might buy another just for a fun shitter even though I daily an IWC

>>17442193
This guy

>>17442191
Except that, to my memory, two people responded angrily last thread at least, and almost always there is one minimum. It's embarrassing, franckly.

>>17442200
well i guess if it's working for you. i just see it posted and keep scrolling, don't even give it a thought
anyway, post watch anon

>>17442196
All the answers you need right here.

>>17442199
Name?

>>17442201
I'm not the anon who keeps posting it, btw. Just an observation.

>>17442204
Poljot Ocean 3133 Chronograph

>>17442180
>>17442196
Search Citizen Ana-Digi and scroll to the good ones.

>>17442209
You reminded me I still need a JP 2000 to complete my Japanese ana digi diver trinity

What I have so far

Are there any quartz dive watches that have backlit ability? I'd prefer that over lume.

>>17442209
Not the same anon, but that's actually a great suggestion. Didn't consider them before.

https://youtu.be/jSRNoojzLUA
https://youtu.be/jSRNoojzLUA

>>17442121
what's wrong with the skx? it's a great watch.
>>17440391
based skx+nato. i'm wearing an olive one right now.

>>17442215
The casio here
>>17442213
But it's not made anymore

>>17440996
The GWF-D1000ARR and the MRG-B2000BL are top tier.

>>17442223
Can you pinpoint which are those two? Too many casios and I don't know them well enough.

>>17442228
Just google them you fucking retard that's what I did. Not who you're replying to.

>>17440996
What are the ones on the top right? Specifically the blue w/ tan, the brown belt and olive belt one? I like the look of them.

>>17442234
Suck yours dad's dick and gag, faggot.

>>17440746
>I'm waiting for the powermatic 35mm PRX to come out.
Won't happen, they need to use a 2892 to fit an auto in the 35mm and tissot isn't allowed to use that movement

>>17442148
>Can anyone ID what Gordon is wearing here?
Sure. In addition to his chef's uniform, he's wearing a watch.

>>17442257
>Won't happen, they need to use a 2892 to fit an auto in the 35mm and tissot isn't allowed to use that movement
How come, when they already have a 35mm PRX Powermatic in their lineup?

>>17442257
>>17442260
Captcha stole my pic

>dat ugly case
>integrated bracelet
Just fucking why?

bros... should i get the seiko spb210
kinda digging the brushed gold but >cyclop

>>17442222
That light is strong. Mine doesn't shine half as bright.

>>17442277
don’t forget the hideous globe engraved into the dial, roflmao

>>17442279
No you shouldn't because the Prospex/Presage line is a joke compared to the discontinued SARB's they were supposed to replace.
Also goes for their 5ports line.

>dat ugly white date window
>dat huge Prospex logo that gives off Casio Edifice vibes
>cyclops
>gold plating
Bonus
>gold plating on a field watch of all watches

Get the SARB017 and replace the stock bracelet with a two-tone one if you really dig more gold.

>>17442277
Cursed

>>17442277
>Frederique Copestant
You're just upset that you can't afford an Audermars, Vacheron or Patek.

>>17442277
Overpriced Swatch.

>>17442304
No way I'm paying that much for a PQ.
If you have anything better for 6k or less, I'm in.

>>17442311
you cant afford a proper QP. give up.

Can you put a deployant clasp on any leather strap that uses springbars?

>>17442335
I think so, you just remove the buckle and replace it with a clasp. I haven't actually seen or used one but there shouldn't be a difference.

any true GMT watches under 1k?

>>17442343
The Bulova Wilton GMT. It debuted the Miyota 9075 movement last year, so expect more Citizen true GMT watches under 1k soon.

>>17440996
See Godard box, well this should be good, was no disappointed.

>>17441576
If you go on reddit and look up sotc's there are some amazing collections, price not related. The guys love their watches there and the collections are normal pretty thought out, /wt/ is a place you come to shit on anyone who post their watches, no real watch talk an little inkwj wjpfo is ever learned here.

>>17442121
black, will age the best

>>17442311
You're lacking. Buy a 8k Blancpain Villeret Perpetual Calendar and be done.

>>17442380
we did it reddit

>>17440467
I’ve had a couple- had an “ultimate” no date sub (mix of best bits of VSF and Clean) and it is pretty much exactly the same as my uncles gen. Same appearance, weight, it’s the same thing

It’s dishonest but who gives a fuck about that really

>>17442414
yea they fucking did, you sack of shit loses, have 0 taste in watches

>>17442380
>normal pretty thought out
On r/watches 90% are the same 12 watches or so and the same fucking collections over and over again with shitty clickbait titles and all upvoted comments are the same circlejerk about how this specific PRX is just as amazing as all the the other 100 PRX's that have been posted the week before.

>my humble collection
>rolex, omega, oris, gshock
>what you mean it's not humble, I have a Casio!?!?!

You're as likely to find a conversation of value there as you are here.

I found this neat little Zenith being sold by a gypsy for 800 bucks, too good to be true? Should I just get a PRX instead?

>>17442448
I can tell just from that pic that it's been polished under a buffing wheel, destroying any sharp lines that watch had. I wouldn't bother.

W-59 > F91-W

change my mind

>>17440649
Super casual here. This kind of Rolex is the only one I'd buy. I don't know if it's worth 5k, but it looks like it.
Also Omegas for about a grand. I don't work for this guy lol.
https://www.stewartswatches.co.uk/pre-owned/po1807

>>17442441
I'll admit when I first got into watches /r/watches/ seemed mature as fuck then I went back there recently and I realized it was just 4chan but with SLIGHTLY more of a pretext of civility, emphasis not added

would any of you guys happen to know about a watch similar to the zenith future time command in this pic? I was thinking maybe a vintage casio would do the trick

>>17442545
I kinda like Lip Mach 2000 watches

>>17442555
I always thought this was Hewlett Packard.

>>17442215
G-shock frogman is the gold standard. Solid state so the only modern dive watch worn by SBS types and other actual frogmen.

>1 week later
>time is 11sec behind
its over....

>>17442599
>got a grand soiko 6 weeks ago
>it has not perceptibly lost or gained any time at all
feelsgoodman dot jpg

>>17442605
>but it IS a gay sexko
feelsbadman dot jpg

>>17442350
That looks surprisingly good, what's the size, is it typical Bulova 500cm?

Would anyone be able to recommend a nice entry level classic-looking watch (roman numerals if possible pls) for a max of £3k/$4k-ish? If it has a moon phase even better, but it's not a deal breaker. I'm more interested in having something I enjoy looking at on a daily basis than I am hung up on the inner workings

>>17442647
sorry, I forgot to include these bits-leather strap ideally, 6.5-7 inch wrist

>>17442647
You want a shit brand or something that you'll replace as soon as you get a job?

>>17442647
Tag Heuer Carrera comes to mind, no numerals but I own pic rel and love it to bits, it was my first non casio watch.
Another good option would be a Tudor 1926 41mm, has leather strap would fit your wrist and has roman numerals

>>17442656
lol retard and double retard if you own that
dude wants something like frederique pederique de la constant not that mall shit

>>17442208
>called ocean
3ATM

>>17441211
In what fucking world is Casio shit? They are god tier.

>>17442656
>Tudor 1926 41mm
picrel
>>17442658
ignore this kike, obvious bait

>>17442647
you should have two watches, something more sporty and something more dressy. I say get a captain willard and longines heritage classic with the sector dial

>>17442656
yuck

>>17442663
>ignore this kike, obvious bait
ok moronicus

>>17442343
traska gmt? 38.5mm

>>17440391
In my opinion this is one of the best looking clocks

>>17442712
That's a ripoff of the Heuer Bund and its derivatives down to the font.

Hello watchfags, what casio model is this?

>>17442718
the kind for ants

>>17442719
Now its for small dogs, cats and racoons.

>>17442716
Maybe, but it doesn't make it look worse. It's a gift from my gf, and I hold it dearly. Also no 99.98% people don't know the difference.

>>17442712
>>17442716
https://www.sinn.de/en/Modell/103_St.htm

Version for real people.

/r/watches is leagues better than /fa/ and anyone saying otherwise is just a contrarian. They aren’t bitter, constantly looking for fights. Sure they have their favorites, like the Speedmaster, Black Gay, and any Rolex, but the collections are still 10x more interesting and diverse than here. There’s only been what 10 actual watch posts so far? This place is shit if you want to discuss watches.

Watchuseek ain’t too bad. But it’s full of old men

>>17442721
Looks like an F-91w

>>17442743
I will discuss watches if someone gives me money to get some, I have more knowledge than 99% of this thread combined, but it's pointless since it's filled with rich retards.

>>17442743
Sad but true. Chart schizos chased out anybody left who discussed watches

>>17442605
which one?

>>17442189
>>17442184
Sorry I’m fucking retarded, it’s this. Other guy is memeing I guess.

Anybody remember that YT video of some guy presenting some watch awards that got posted here recently? The guy has funny gray hair.

>>17442746
thx

>>17442766
This one?
https://youtu.be/rxagYGYyk5o

>>17440996
uv light/10

Vostok master race

Is there a good resource to look up which models of the Heuer Monaco were released since Tag Heuer rebooted the brand?
>different regions
>different model years
>no single compendium on what there has been released on any official site
It's all so tiresome.

id?

>>17442786
Yeah that's the one, thanks.

Muh Orient

>>17442757
It's nice to see you're still here chronobro. Care to post your collection again? I haven't seen it in a while.

>>17442795
There hasn't been a monaco worth getting. A proper Monaco has 2 subdials for the chrono, the minutes and a 12h totalizer, no running seconds, and a crown on the left. They have a throwback Monaco branded only Heuer with a left side crown but it's only a 30 minute timer and has running seconds. They do have Monaco's with a 12h totalizer but they're branded tag heuer, have the crown on the right and they added a fucking useless subdial at 6 o'clock for running seconds. What they've done is make it so that no matter which Monaco you buy, something is wrong with it.

>>17442812
Not to diagonal l dissimilar to the Omega Chrono with the single logo on it for the Olympics. Other than that, not a clue sorry

>>17442795
>>17442826
>>17442831

Yeah I miss this dude too. I love you Monaco bros / Heuer brahs.

I have been itching to get the left hand calibre 11 Monaco but yes they butchered the sub dials. It’s a bit Jimmy rustling but I appreciate the look and historu enough to not care. I could get the actual 50 year old original but I don’t want to maintain it.

I blew my wad on omegas, Rolexes, and tudors. Now I like Heuer, Lange, blancpain. I’m broke now so will be back to buying in 10 years unless I can sell my Tudor and save for the calibre 11

>>17442812
Judging by the size of the subdials it's some cheap shitter.

>>17442883
>Not to diagonal l dissimilar to the Omega Chrono with the single logo on it for the Olympics

>>17442924
He's having a stroke! Someone get him help!

>>17442549
nice watch Anon and also nice Kurisu too.

I might get this cunt. I've never even watched magnum pi but I kind of want a quartz beater for camping, biking and shit since even cheap mechanical watches are expensive to fix and thos one looks cool. Are ronda movements mega shit or good enough? I'd love a quartz tuna but over 1k for a beater seems kind of stupid lol.

>>17442978
>42mm
Why cant fags make their vintage inspired watched in vintage sizes.

Would this look good with a blue nato strap? The band is ridicolous uncomfortable.

>>17442743
>There’s only been what 10 actual watch posts so far? This place is shit if you want to discuss watches.
Because it's fucking boring to discuss the same watches over and over again. Chances are the thing you want to discuss has already been discussed at some point.
Been there, done that; in one of the previous 142 /wt/ threads.

Of course predditors like you will always be like
>oh but I haven't been in the last thread, let's do it all over again
Lurk more, faggot.

Anyone bought from this company? Are they bullshit or passable? Love the gimmicks but worried it’s gonna look shitty. Not necessarily this model.

>>17443002
Get a silicon one or just a regular non-leather strap. Nato straps are not only hideous but not actually functional because they'll fuck up your spring bars and you're gonna lose your watch.

>>17440728
Get a 1" brush and wash the watch with soap.

I like Breitling and will probably get a Navitimer soon since I'm a pilot watch autist
Deal with it

>>17443014
As long as you already have a real watch, why not.

>>17443006
These things are always shitty, anon. Anything that isn't on the chart >>17440417 plus the quality homages that chinks make (San Martin, ...) isn't worth your money.

>>17443018
Anyone on the chart make a similar gimmick?

>>17442277
cyclops watch lmao

>>17443016
I own an IWC Pilot
Next watch will either be the Navitimer, Zenith Pilot or the new 43mm Big Pilot

>>17442743
we did it reddit

>>17442237
The olive one is one of the Seiko Turtles with a compass bezel

>>17443021
I don't think so. Harry Winston and Ulysee Nardin have some quirky stuff but that's ridiculously expensive.

>>17442988
Original was 42mm, scrub. L2L is 47mm so it should where similarly to an SKX

>>17443023
Then all is well, you're rich and you can do what you want, why are you looking for validation here?

Anyone have any experience with Traska watches? I am looking to get a Flyer "True" GMT that isn't going to break the bank. Can't decide on what color to get.

>>17443035
>Ulysee Nardin have some quirky stuff
I want pic rel more than my next breath

>>17443050
Not "rich" just in a position where getting a 5-10k watch every two years or so doesn't negatively affect me

>>17442743
>>17443003
This place got me started on watches, but it becomes very exhausting after a while. Threads are slow, annyoning shitposters andthere is never a great amount of depth to the discussions.
I also was on watch reddit for a while, pictures are prettier and they actually discuss watches there but redditors know even less about watches than people in here and their tastes are even blander.
I can just recommend Normiegram & watchgroups on FB/telegram, you can find a group that fits your niche, meet wih people to got to e.g. vintage watch fairs & make watchfriends. A lot more fulfilling that just screming into the void of 4channel

>>17443023
>>17443050
Breitling >>> IWC

>>17443132
In what way? I'm inclined to agree just want to see what people have to say

>>17443064
Emaille watches are dope, this Baby is coming my way from Japan rn
And yeah, the UN is freaky

Apparently this is a real watch. Any other lads into watches with pave diamonds? Just ordered my first one. Don't like the overly blingy ones that make you look like a rapper but micro pave diamond dials are very kino.

>>17443147
lol you are so retarded

>>17443057
Some anon purchased a non-GMT one and the indices were misaligned. He got another one and they were misaligned as well and i think he kept it.

>>17443096
Fuck you retarded piece of shit.

>>17443057
Dude they can't even align the indices on the fucking promo photo lmfao.

>>17443138
Due to superior history, range od models, bolder and revolutionary moves, for me Breitling is one tier above IWC. I want to say it reminds me of Rolex vs GS comparsion, but I feel like that is unfair to the GS. I find both IWC and GS ugly as a sin, but at least GS was pushing boundaries all throughout its history. IWC is a well made and expensive swiss watch, but so is the Breitling. I find IWC boring and sterile, but if someone likes them that is good enough reason to go for it over Breitling, despite the above

>>17441809
>no fluted bezel

>>17443151

Watches are a fashion statement to 90% of the population, and external validation on taste and knowledge for the rest. Diamond pave watch is the most acceptable form of jewelry for men, so why not bling for a bit?

>>17442121
could also consider a land tortoise
voting for the white dial version as well

>>17443168
what a fucking idiot

>>17443007
Band derived from military is going to lose my watch? I have tissot prc200 on a nato strap for 10 years and I never lost it.

>>17443212
>>17443212

>>17440467
I have a fake moonswatch I got for 40$. its fun and im glad I never paid 300$+ for a gen. The fakes now usually use a 2813 movement which is fine its just a copy of a miyota but if you wanna throw a better movement in go for it.

>>17443007
>Nato straps are (...) actually functional because they'll fuck up your spring bars and you're gonna lose your watch.
You're legit retarded

>prices of Rolex as well as various luxury items are dropping world wide for some reason
Last time this happen was when we are headed for a recession, I hope this isn't the case. Still I wonder how long they would go, the days of $2000 Subbys might be back.

>>17442826
It's nothing special. Still want to sell the Seiko Monster and Carrera. I've been super busy and have been trying some new hobbies, haven't really been interested in watches lately. Would like to add a linen dial Datejust some time

>>17442824
The crown and screw on that watch was fucking terrible had to send it back. Did not screw in well, felt like I was going to strip it at anytime and was very difficult to use. Way too small.

Are the San martin/steeldive homages actually better quality than the seiko they are homaging? Looking at a Willard which won't be as high quality as the new reissue but hopefully better than a standard turtle or the actual vintage Willard.

Is Zodiac Watches good or are they shit? I'm planning on getting one but don't know that's a bad idea or not.

>>17443767
Might as well just get a Fossil watch.

>>17442441
And yet /wt/ love the PRX, I’d just look at it as a I didn’t get a RO reminder. When guys say that humble collection, it normally is, they prob have a Rolex few omegas and a shitter. For normal professionals in the west that is not a lot of money. If you’re on £100-150k and been working 5 or so years in your 30s you have made £500k or so, so 20k+ in watch isn’t that much. /wt/ is broke as fuck

>>17442743
>>17442757
Yea that sounds about right

>>17443767
god tier

>>17442257
they already have a 35mm auto prx but its some nouveau rich diamond encrusted version. They have the capability just likely delaying the release.
See >>17442262 >>17442260

>>17442743
>There’s only been what 10 actual watch posts so far?

Because watches do not deserve more.
A watch is just a symbolic purchase.