/fa/ - Fashion

Fossil and Skagen make watches you can wear with a suit

Muhle glasshute as a first "serious" watch, yes or no?

>>17423261
you can wear it and people can quietly laugh at you :)

here's your Swiss luxury watch, bro

>>17423265
many such cases

>>17423265
Transparent case backs on tool watches are stupid. The movements don't need to be decorated on such watches.
Once again the only brand that got it right is Rolex.

should i worry about a screw down crown for heavy rain? Not like hurricane rain but borderline storm levels of rain?

Grand Seiko's evolution 9 cases and their new 9R and 9S movements are so much better than anything they did before that it makes discussion of their other stuff feel irrelevant

>>17423253
I will :)

> Poorfag guide: https://imgur.com/a/NFMXDuK
> Watch essentials 102: https://pastebin.com/Rc77hhXV
> Purchasing used watches: https://pastebin.com/f44aJKy2
> Purchasing straps: https://pastebin.com/SwRysprE

Should I buy this MVMT / DW / "minimalist" fashion watch?
> https://imgur.com/a/6CNO8

Should I buy this Armani / Michael Kors / mall watch?
> https://imgur.com/a/Sw1FsAn

"Suggest a watch for me."
> Your budget
> Watch type, e.g. dress, diver, pilot
> Movement, e.g. automatic, hand wound, quartz
> Desired features, e.g. water resistance, day/date, 2nd time zone
> Preferred strap option, e.g. leather, nylon, bracelet
> Wrist size or desired watch size

>>17423265
heres my swiss entry level watch bros

Thought on this? My future father-in-law wants to buy me a watch to commemorate marrying his daughter.
So I need something that I can keep forever but can;t go too high on price.

>>17423273
Non watch people have the wrong idea about WR. You buy a watch with "overkill" WR not because you're going scuba diving the day you buy it, but because you don't want to worry about destroying it when you procrastinated on getting it serviced and it's 6 years overdue and you get caught in a downpour

That said, the screw down part is not what makes it water resistant per se, that just protects the stem from getting banged around which can bend it and cause the gasket to no longer seal. It's not unlike a crown guard or a recessed crown.

>>17423268
mechanical watches are not tool watches
they are fun toys and being able to see the movement is part of the fun

>>17423348
Hamiltons have throwaway movements. If you want a watch to keep and service, in that price range, consider a Longines VHP

>>17423348
Would be nice if the 38mm murph had something other than a powermatic 80 based movement in it, but at least it doesn't have the plastic escapement. Tempted to get one of them myself to be honest.

>>17423348
How much is too much?

>>17423361
What's wrong with the plastic escapement?

>>17423348
I would pick a spb143. One of the least fussy classically designed watches could think of around that price.

The Murph has fauxtina = instant no
Longines has a cool movement but some of their design quirks like the crown guard, i don't know how they will age.

>>17423389
The NB6021 isn't a bad choice either if you have bigger wrists

Any affordable luxury recommendations?

Cope if you must, and you will.

>>17423405
tissot prx
that's it
thats the only one

I want to like it bros but I can’t. First modern dive watch is near but it looks pretty drab.

>>17423414
It’s a great looking watch for the price but what do you appreciate about it?

>>17423424
good finishing, swiss movement, history. i don't own it myself i just wear my tudor but i'll pick one up soon

>>17423429
Which Tudor do you have? Thanks for responding.

>>17423430
BB58

>>17423432
I think that watch has a classy look to it.

I wish I knew more about watches before I started buying them and just bought this.

>>17423432
I have a Pelagos and am probably gonna sell it tbqh

>>17423324
Excellent choice

>>17423409
my local watch "shop" which exists over 40 years (austria) said if seiko was made in switzerland it would cost 8x more than it is. same for orient automatics.
but i bet you mongolian basket weaving forum losers know better than an old expert guy with gray hair

>>17423409
>look how much money I can spend
I clap, sir, and I bow. Well done, and thankyou for your service. Then... ughhh o-oh no.... ohhhh uhhhh uhhhhhhhhh
BRAAAAPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP

>>17423466

>>17423421
I like it a lot.

>>17423466
Yes, we do.

>>17423474
It's not our fault that you belong to the lower class.

>>17423436
Based

I set my watch just yesterday over 24-27 hours ago. now it's exactly 5 seconds ahead. is this bad, average, good ?

>>17423501
Pretty good. Look up positional variance, you may never have to set your watch again.

Opinions on this?

>>17423421
They look a lot better in person.

>>17423414
It was only 650$ I like it but I wouldn't call it luxury.

>>17423275
They will update all of their stuff soon.

>>17423534
Friend has one. It's a solid shitter, nothing special. Bracelet sucks.

>>17423663
>Bracelet sucks.
In what way?

Nothing sexier than a beautiful lady with a rolex

>>17423699
fucking dying at that arm hair

>>17423699
More forearm hair pics please!

>>17423356
Go be stupid somewhere else

>>17423699
I want to see her shitter

Ordered a replacement strap for my Swatch GB743 Once Again, it's gonna be a a Hirsch leather strap on a plastic watch.

>>17423712
are you retarded anon
if you want a tool watch get a cheap solar quartz not something that is an overpriced luxury item that requires regular servicing to stay somewhat accurate and will never have the same durability or shock resistance as a simple gshock does
no one considers modern mechanical watches actual tools

>>17423722
I've never been thrilled with any of the leather straps I've bought, but I'm having a really hard time wrapping my mind around the idea of spending 450 eurobux for a camille fournet

Wat do effay?

>>17423734
take the rubber strap pill

>>17423735
Those have been hit or miss for me as well but I don't mind the crafterblue I have on my srp

Doesn't really work for something more dressy than a diver though

>>17423253
thoughts?

>>17423741
I feel like you need to be running around with a hollow handle rambo knife to wear that coherently

>>17423733
>no one considers modern mechanical watches actual tools
Why can't they be considered tools anon? I find it quite useful when I wear my watch and it's an automatic

>>17423741
I have one of those.
The rubber dimples on the back kind of hurt my wrist after a while.

>>17423741
Manchild

A. Lange & Söhne, FP Journe and Audermars Piguet make my dick
diamond hard.

AP sucks cock.

>want to start a luxury watch collection
>don't want to worry about people targeting my home and stealing it
wat do

>>17423764
this is the wrong way to go about starting a watch collection I think.
>luxury watch collection
it should be just a watch collection
start with one watch instead of thinking it has to be an entire collection

>>17423348
Ask for a Rolex

>>17423421
I wish they made this in 38 mm. I would pay 10k for one then

>>17423699
Rolex is peak masculinity. Why would a woman wear such thing?

>>17423771
i own 7 watches

>>17423760
Your mum sucks cock

>>17423779
it’s romantic when she does it for my father, it’s homosexual when AP does it for gay black thugs.

>>17423785
>And then, she kisses you on the forehead.
It's gay when she lefts your dad's swimers of you anyway.

>>17423734
Really just depends on the watch. Camille Fournet is as far as I know the absolute best of the best and it doesn’t make sense to pay for one to put on a $2k Longines shitter, but if you’re wearing a $10k JLC or $30k Patek then you might as well go for it. The customizability aspect is pretty desirable as well since lots of watches these days ship with straps that have questionable designs. Also if you order a strap from a manufacturer that uses Fournet straps, you’ll get raked across the coals and charged 3-4x what you’d pay if you bought direct.

I love my Tag Heuers

>>17423805
i’m sorry you have incestuous fantasies of your own mother.
>It's gay when she lefts your dad's swimers of you anyway.
this isn’t a real sentence.

I love the dated 90s design of the Semenmaster. The tank tread bracelet, the scalloped bezel, and the dial reminiscent of windows 95 tiled wallpapers.. What does /fa/ think of it? Regardless, I'm gonna get one of these guys by the end of the year

>>17423253
Milfag guy from a few threads ago. I got my DW5600MS and you guys were right, it's impossible to see in the dark.

Still looks really slick, but I might get a regular DW5600. If I wore techwear stuff this would be pretty sweet.

>>17423741
Rally drivercore

I just want a Rolex submariner so fucking bad. I walk past a Rolex store every fucking day and all I see are empty shelves. Fuck this gay earth.

>>17423843
i wish i too were so easily impressed

>bought a few new bands just after Christmas for different watches, also some new tools
>fucking NOTHING has even left the warehouses or shipped yet
Has the whole world gone on a 10 day break or what? This is pissing me off.

>>17423850
>no forearm hair
Ugh.

>>17423824
I want one.

>>17423824
my condolences

>>17423814

So, I know Skagen watches are timepieces of shit but I like how they're thin and elegant-looking
Is there anything else in the sub-$300 price range that is also thin and elegant-looking but won't literally instantly explode when I wear it?
Quartz is fine
Sub-40mm is ideal

>>17423850
>g-shocked.com

>>17423432
Fucking nice. I want the 925 sterling silver version. I'm saving my pennies for it.

>>17423764
Don't post expensive shit on Instagram. Also, never tell the internet when you are going on vacation or away from your home EVER. Post vacation photos after you get back, not while you are there.

>>17423881
First he should secure his residence so that it’s basically impenetrable. Cameras, security system, lasers, booby traps, etc. It might also be worthwhile to live in a high security condominium or gated community.

>>17423865
I'm thinking about getting a Tissot PRX in the mint green dial in the coming months. $330, Swiss, quartz, and an awesome watch according to the internet. I want to see it in person before I decide though.

>>17423887
>$330
That's it? I thought they were 3k for some reason. I would've bought 5 of them by now if I knew they were so cheap.

Opinions on popular german brands? Meme or solid choice for entry level luxury?

>>17423885
> Moat.
> Alligators.
> Drawbridge.
We're done here.

>>17423889
Yep. The automatic version is $650
https://www.tissotwatches.com/en-us/t1374071109100.html
Quartz:
https://www.amazon.com/Tissot-Stainless-Steel-Dress-T1374101104100/dp/B08TB1MF6F?source=ps-sl-shoppingads-lpcontext&ref_=fplfs&psc=1&smid=A3DXC55FSLW0KC

>>17423887
>>17423892
>swatch group
>proprietary straps
>doubt the price of a swatch
lmao just buy a swatch

>>17423890
You can’t afford German watches

Krauts do it in a pretty based fashion.

>>17423895
Sinn, muhle, homos, junghaus, stowa are pretty attainable. Big guy german luxury - sure as shit I cant.

>>17423896
Oh hey it's the bog-standard ETA layout that was in $150 watches once again, let me guess $10k for this one?

Thoughts on Seiko Presage?

>>17423741
Gshock needs to be squared digital or round analog.

>>17423898
Muhle actually modifies their shit hard inhouse. Homos do whole movements from the ground inhouse. And its not that expensive. Sinn though likes to use mass produced stock stuff if I remember correctly

>>17423881
also: don't have a cuckold fetish

>>17423881
I'm not really worried about someone I don't know targeting me. Thieves are most often people you know. Coworkers, acquaintances, etc. Happened to someone at my church when her husband died. He didn't have social media or anything. They broke in multiple times to take his guitars. It was people he was close to.

>>17423906
>>Muhle actually modifies their shit hard inhouse.
Oh hey it's the bog-standard ETA layout that was in $150 watches once again, let me guess $10k for this one?

>>17423915
Autism

>>17423916
I mean it looks exactly like IWC which looks exactly like Fortis which looks exactly like Revue Thomen which looks exactly like Laco etc

>>17423776
What's your fav

>>17423897
Good. Point is, German watches are nice, and hella underrated.

>>17423933
Able to name some brands? I'm not familiar with any German watches.

Has anyone done any watch-related tourism such as Swiss factory tours or museums. I would like to visit a watch factory or workshop just out of curiosity. Granted I assume there is secret proprietary stuff going on so naturally any public tour would be strictly limited.

>>17423933
I only know A. Lange & Söhne. They are way out of my price range though.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJUQYJkoANk

>>17423937
>tfw no midget oriental gf who works at the rolex factory
I'm in love, guys

>>17423897
Yeah, but all the brands you listed are shitters.

>>17423943
She looks albanian

>>17423931
My Alpinist

>>17423917
Dunno, I think german watches have a very distinct style. Sure as hell more recognizable and with more character than say tissot for same price or smt like that. But I agree, they often cost a bit more then the competition.

>>17423952
Sorry my guy, I cant buy 10k+ watches yet.
Have to settle for shitters, I guess. Still more interesting than cookie cutter tissot, vanilla hamilton etc.

>>17423989
idk why but the role reversal here has me dying

>>17423967
>Dunno, I think german watches have a very distinct style
yeah they all look like shit

>>17423999
What doesnt look like shit to you? Not baiting, just wanna know what you find pleasant to look at.
>inb4 30k watches

What are some strap options for the Khaki Field Murph? Not considering NATO straps, still want to go for some high quality leather like Hirsch.

someone talk me out of buying a $5 watch of ali. I'm a leaf but even after finding a model I like It's way too much fucking work to find somewhere it's not already sold out.

Other option is to just walk into a store and pick something up but honestly I just need something passable for the future date I don't yet have and I think one of the generic minimalistic ones can get me through a couple nights.

>>17423963
Why does the new reissue of the alpinist insist on having the giant date dial in white with a magnifier? Ruined the ascetic.

>>17423936
A. Lange & Söhne?

>>17423887
I have the dark blue (almost a grey) dial version. I get compliments from normies about it all the time. They don't really care or notice that it is a quartz. Easily the best money ive spent on a watch - imo it looks vastly more expensive than it is. I cant decide between getting the mint one or the mechanical version, seeing as I already have a quartz. But you can't go wrong with the mint.

extremely wealthy watch enthusiast friend once jokingly referred to it as a "fake AP". at fancy events or business meetings I usually wear something a bit less eye-catching, like a dress watch.

>>17424057
They look ten times worse in person than in the pics, like literal kids' toys. They will stop working in a month or two. Not even worth the five dollars and the month's delivery wait.

>>17424057
so is this what it's like to be unfortunate enough to have a high time preference mindset

>>17423699
wow. fat and trans, great value.

>>17423715
y-you don't mean her cheapest watch, d-do you?

anyone had this happen to them? Want a specific watch very much, get it in the mail, open box, well it's like I don't really want it. On the other hand if I return it I'm sure that I'll be lusting after it again

Thoughts on a 36mm explorer on an average (7.25in) sized wrist?

>>17424131
that's the correct size for an explorer, yes

When travelling, is there a chance the watch I'm wearing can be magnetized by the x-ray machine when checking in to a flight? Should I just get a quartz shitter with me on vacation instead?

>>17424173
Zero chance

>>17424176
Thanks. I'm feeling better now.

>>17424173
>x-ray machine
>magnetism
this thread is unreal

>>17424183
I stumbled upon some threads on some forums, all of them fags like me asking the same shit, some of them said yes, others no, had to ask too.

>>17424129
no, I'm not that retarded

>>17424205
it is as if I like the watch on its own but I'd have to force myself to wear it

>>17424210
You like thecidea and emotion of obtaining and wanting, not actually owning and using. Many such cases.

>>17424129
>>17424210
this meme is basically always misused these days but this guy is a perfect example of a consoomer.

Any recommendations for a leather strap to suit a 60's oyster perpetual?

I inherited one and it's got a shithouse aftermarket band that doesn't fit.

>>17424224
kek you really can't wait until the AD has it?

>>17424224
Retarded idiot.

>>17424227
sorry, couldn't read

>>17424232
go on

PRX or Khaki Field Murph 38mm? The PRX in rose gold and white waffled dial, automatic. Tried it on in a boutique and it was a very nice watch, the rose gold is not as flashy as I thought.

>>17424253
I would get a hami. More soul. Tissot is kinda npc tier, but thats just my two cents

>>17424260
I like Hamilton too, maybe a bit too much but seeing the PRX in person made me think twice, idk. It’s a tough choice considering they’re both in the same price range and have good movements.

>>17423937
JLC will give you a tour of their headquarters if you reach out in advance. You don’t even need to be a customer, they’ll take you around the whole place and you can even speak with the CEO if she’s available. I haven’t done it because I’m an Amerifat, but if I ever go to Europe it’s at the top of my list of places to go. They obviously won’t show you the secret stuff but they show you the archives, high watchmakers working on crazy stuff, gem setting, engraving, enamel painting etc.

After countless try-ons I fell out of love with the Longines Zulu GMT and cancelled my order. Kinda glad I didn't end up spending over two grands for it.

I'm still looking for a nice automatic with blue dial.
>max. 2k
>39-42mm case diameter
>47-50mm lug-to-lug
>A mesmerziing sunburst blu dial with not arabic/roman numbers, just indecides

My first choice is the Formex Essence Leggera 41 but I already one the Reef and I'd rather give another brand a try.

>>17424274
Like I said, I would get a hami. In rhat price range seikos offer something decent also. Dunno, if you can muster a bit more, maybe muhle panova is up your alley, if you are cool with obvious quirkyness.

Help me identify this rolex pls.
Datejust 36mm. Part gold on the bracelet.
Small roman numbers on the bezel.
Trying to figure out the price online. Pops wants to sell it.

>>17424306
Btw blue marks measures 36mm
Orange mark is 41mm

>>17424306
Two-tone black dial datejust with fluted bezel and Roulette Date Wheel

>>17424314
>Two-tone black dial datejust with fluted bezel and Roulette Date Wheel
Thanks Anon !! any clue what the actual market price could be ? all the sites i checked is marked with "sold" allready

>>17424306
the cyclops and the 12o clock crown look like a fake to me, but they could be really old?

>>17424332
It's the artificial blurr, motin blurr, dust...took an overexposed photo on my smartphone at dimm light.
It's genuine

>>17424293
>Frederique Constant Classics Index FC-303NN5B6B
could be up your alley, but it doesn't have sunburst

>>17423265
>Tudor
>Luxury
Tongue my anus

>>17423275
>It's getting better guys! I promise!

>>17424454
maybe one day grand seiko will get so good that they realize that rectangular indices look horrible with dauphine hands.

>>17424456
They'll remain shitters until they drop the name and start putting a serious effort into caliber finishing.

>>17424474
if they do that they’ll start eating into credor’s market share, those eichi ii’s wont sell themselves

>>17424057
It will last you 6 months max.

I've tried some Rolex today.
>GMT Master II Pepsi
>Submariner
>Explorer II
>Datejust mint green dial
They're miles ahead in terms of quality to everything else I've tried before. They feel sturdy and rock-solid. They also look beautiful.
Honestly bros, Rolex dabs on the whole watch industry it's not even funny. I didn't even look at the Cartier and Zenith the sale assistant brought me.
Why are they so fucking expensive and hard to get? All I want is a Rolex and be done with watches once and for all.

Il looking for a new daily driver:
- metal bracelet
- small (34-38mm width)
- preferably somewhat water resistant
- auto or manual
- vintage or new
- white or silver dial
- suitable for wearing with suits or casual clothes

I was looking at the BB36 but the profile is definitely too bulky for my taste.
Max price 2-3K although less would be even better
Any suggestions?

>>17424342
>FC-303NN5B6B
Not my cup of tea but thanks for the recommendation.

>>17424494
i wish i too were so easily satisfied.

>>17424494
I really want an Explorer II "polar".
You aren't alone, my dude.

>>17424293
San Martin

>>17423699
Is this the same hag that's also on that weird wrists collage?

>>17423894
I mean... Hamilton, Omega, ETA... It's all Swatch. The integrated bracelet looks nice, and the finishing is professional. By your logic aren't I already considering buying a Swatch?

>>17423741
Reminds me of the second ever Casio i had.

>>17423887
Is mint green/pistachio going to be the new Tiffany blue?

>>17423896
I like them both, everything is as it should be, nothing is out of place.

>>17423268
mechanical watches nowadays are not tool watches tho. Everyone who need an actual tool watch uses digital.

>>17423900
Solid watches, although a bit outdated by now. Might be a good idea to save another couple hundred bucks and go for the Alpinist or Sharp Edge series.

>>17424537
not until patek puts it on a nautilus, no.

>>17423741
why are gshocks so fucking huge? Shouldn't digital be smaller than mechanical?

>>17424057
It looks nothing like it does on photos in real life, you'll regret it the moment you open the box.

>>17424224
Rich brown and not shiny.

>>17423937
GS will happily show you around any of their factories and they won't hide much either.

>>17424512
soulless

>>17424497
Also check Longines.

>>17424494
Sucks they’ve became a thug brand. People will think you’re slinging dope or stole it after seeing it on your wrist.

anyone got a lopsided wrist? I took out links from the bracelet from both sides equally, but this results in the clasp pressing down on my veins and my hands get cold and feel constricted even with a very loose setting. By removing all the links exclusively from the thumb side I got rid of that issue even with a tighter setting.

>>17424581
Rolex (specifically the two-tone Datejust and the yellow gold Day Date) have always been associated with mafiosi, coked up yuppies and used cars salesmen.

>>17424642
too bad none of the watches the first anon tried on are any of those. he tried on all the hype sports models.

Just got this as a gift. Radio wave controlled watch. I think i will refresh battery and wear it.

>>17424678
is it not solar?

post a watch nobody owns
hardmode: must not be above 4 figures

>cheap watches are literally cardboard
>expensive watches are just NFTs inside fidget spinners
>smartwatches are neither "smart" nor "watches"
I'm gonna throw up, anons
God is dead

>>17424704
What do you mean 'nobody owns'? Absolutely nobody? Just me?

>>17423491
You're still too poor to burn money.

>>17424704
I dare you to find it for sale anywhere

>>17424707
you are such an epic blackpilled doomer

>>17424707
Rolex professional line frend. Nothing else mattress

>>17424704
it's much easier to not own a watch over 4 figures. I would consider it hardmode to own an inexpensive watch that everybody could own, but doesn't

>>17424689
no apparently not just quartz/radio controlled movement

>>17424260
Hamilton has way more soul and better designs. The only tissot I will defend to my death is the visodate. Prx is ok, but the visodate doesn’t look like a tissot at all

>>17424707
get a pocket watch my sir

>>17424086
If they would have made the digits on the date gold, I would have preferred the white, as it would have matched the hands. My biggest gripe with it is that giant, hideous prospex logo

>>17424086
the magnifier is part of the aesthetic. just like an explorer II would look a giant gay explorer without it

Bought this today, I've been researching chronographs for about a year now, and have finally chosen. Bloody love it, can't wait to have it on the wrist. I do a pelagic brid watching trip each summer, and I already know I'll want to wear this whilst out off the scilly isles.

The only remaining gap in my collection now is a dressy moonphase. I'll spend the next year searching again.

>>17424678
>>17424689
ok it is with SOLAR !! but it's not functioning.
it was inside a box for years.
can i use my phone flashlight to load it ? lol
it's currently nighttime

>>17423741
It's one of the best looking G-Shocks. The timers are amazing but I hate not having the current time in all modes. The buttons are also a bitch to press, some oldfags even boiled the resin to make the buttons easier to press. The dual illuminator looks fantastic and it's a shame they don't put that feature on newer G-Shocks. Without a dual illuminator you have no idea what the charge level or alarms are in the dark on models like the GW-M5610U or the GW-6900. It's a medium sized watch for a G-Shock so I wouldn't recommend it for small wrists. Not the most comfortable but wearable. It's has been discontinued for a while but there is plenty of stock left.

tldr: kinda outdated but some better features not present on modern G-shocks and looks great
7/10

>>17424917
>best looking
As the anon above said, square g shock=digital only, round g shock =analog or analog-digi
Simple as

>>17424832
>diver
>chrono
questionable choice anon

>>17424556
If you want a small watch you can get an F91W. It's smaller than most mechanicals. For shock protection G-Shock has a floating design which makes the case bigger. The resin bezel also makes it more durable and larger. The models in the "man" series like Mudman and Frogman are designed to be used in environments where people are wearing gloves so the buttons are large and the bezel is bigger. A square G-Shock is about the size of a modern mechanical.

Random picture from the internet.

>>17424920
It's a good thing your arbitrary, illogical rules have no bearing on design or taste. If you want an irreproachable rule here's one: The ugliest digital G-Shock looks better than any analog or analog-digital G-Shock. Don't reply to me again tastelett.

>>17424932
That's actually a pretty decent affordable three watch collection.

>>17424875
Just put it under a lamp.

>>17424781
The visodate is a fugly mess. Perfect example of a low tier consumer brand reissuing a "heritage" product and fucking it up

I buy only expensive watches. Can anyone here compete?

>>17424971
Post a picture on one of your watches inside a shoe

>>17424972
Why?

>>17424980
Stop asking questions

>>17424980
nta but because that would be an easy way for you to prove you own those watches and you're not just downloading them from reddit

also we'd get to see your shoes which are probably embarrassing hence why you won't post any

>>17424981
Why?

>>17424971
I steal only expensive watches.

>>17424939
What the fuck did you just phucking say about me, you little bitch? I'll have you know I graduated top of my class in the CW21 Watch Certification class, and I've been involved in numerous Seiko 5 meetups, and I have over 300 confirmed watch services. I am trained in PURE CLASS and I'm the top watchmaker in the entire watchmaking community. You are nothing to me but just another Swiss shitter lover. I will wipe your ass of this planet like I wipe my watch cases, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my network of casio suppliers across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you never get to enjoy such a fine timepiece, maggot. Your miserable life will be forever stuck with your Rolex or whatever sort of Swiss shitter you've mistakenly bought. Your chance to enjoy haute holorogy is over kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can dismantle you faster than a 7s26 movement. Not only am I extensively trained in servicing the 7s26 movement, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the Gentry and I will use it to its full extent to ensure you never experience PURE CLASS, you little shit. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little "clever" comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn't, you didn't, and now you're paying the price, you goddamn philistine. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You've chuffed your last bits, kiddo.

>>17424923
Why does it matter? Serious question

>>17424971
My watches are more expensive than your watches

>>17424971
Ye don’t holdout m8 post with proof they are yours or I’m gonna downvote you mother bitch

>>17425059
U too

In /fit/ if you say these things about your aesthetics every single person says post body and gets dabbed on if they don’t. I’m here shitposters constantly talk about their epic taste and collection and never post proof. Only thing we see besides lawyer anon and that one black dude in IT is people posting shitters.

Post collection or stfu

>>17425066

>>17425069
Based and proof pilled.

>>17425069
Some people will say say lul no taste lul two tone but at least you posted an expensive watch.

>>17425066
I posted pic related in a thread a few days ago about getting this neat NATO strap on it and I got scolded for using one since apparently people don't like NATOs now. I like it though so whatever.

>>17425076
It looks cool anon. It also makes sense with a diver.

Both posters who said they have more expensive watchers have Rolexes lol

>>17425073
He did post a pic, though without any proof it's his.
>Here's a pic of a Ferrari. It's mine. :^)

>>17425090
>Both posters who said they have more expensive watchers have Rolexes lol
Rolex owners value their watches at what they traded for at the height of the craze a few months ago.

>>17425091
True, baby steps I guess. At least a watch was posted with the claim. Claiming a two tone datejust or Rolex sub is believable enough for me.

>>17425090
What code is that Seamaster? I like it.

>>17425095
Yah for me the two tone SS and black sub are 10k-12k watches for my own valuation I don’t know or care too much what they go for these days but it’s less. It’s a weak flex to have a Rolex to me in general but it’s better than reading a shit post without any picture whatsoever.

>>17425104
Thanks fren it was my first watch ever. Pic I posted was a nato I put on

https://www.omegawatches.com/en-us/watch-omega-seamaster-planet-ocean-600m-co-axial-master-chronometer-chronograph-45-5-mm-21520465103001

>>17425104
Also if you do a little digging you can get it for around 12ish last I checked maybe even lower, sometimes new.

>>17425107
Good choice on the NATO, I'd probably do the exact same. The gold on the bezel itself looks great but the bracelet gold looks a bit tacky to me.

>Also if you do a little digging you can get it for around 12ish last I checked maybe even lower, sometimes new.
I might grab it off Chrono24, is that site any good? I've never bought a used watch before in all honesty, I've never known where to go since getting scammed on watches is a distinct possibility.

>>17425114
The nato does dress it down but you could even get the same watch without the flashy strap. Sometimes I feel it’s tacky and sometimes I feel like I miss it so I wear the bracelet seasonally.

eBay actually inspects their watches, Jomashop is known to be reliable, and Chrono24 I have never used but they hold the money you pay in escrow as a protection + it depends on the seller.

With all that said, this watch is too obscure to have much of a chance of many reps of it. Making a believable rep is a serious production so they generally only get their ROI if there will be many buyers think AP Royal oak or most stainless Rolex. You would be just fine, I had the same thoughts as you and paid retail at a shop for peace of mind since I was brand new and finally had enough money to buy my first “real watch”. My taste is very different now but I will keep this watch anyway because of the memories of it.

TLDR you should be fine. It also has a clear caseback for you to evaluate the finishing.

>>17425066
what im going to run to my safety deposit box thats 20 miles away to post my 10 million dollar collection every time you faggots ask for it? I have places and meetings to be at. Just bought the misses and I tickets to Hawaii, its going to be awesome. Aloha seiko wearer.

>>17425131
Blah blah blah no pics stfu

>>17425066
>>17425136
why such anguish

>>17425121
>Sometimes I feel it’s tacky and sometimes I feel like I miss it so I wear the bracelet seasonally.
I find myself in the same boat and I ended up buying some tools so I could change them easily all the time.

>>17423741
MUDMAN

>>17425155
I had the tool which removed one of the pins at a time and it was scratching my watches and took me a long time. The tweezers made in Switzerland which begin with a B if I remember correctly were 150 but took seconds. Berget was the name maybe? It’s in a box somewhere but very nice tool.

>>17425131
>my safety deposit box
People who can afford good watches don't need these

>>17425076
That thing looks so fake it's not even funny.

>>17424729
lmoa JUNKers

>classic vintage look
>elegant shape
>dome glass
>+/- 5sec per day
>doesn't have the gay dive rotating ring
>made by honorary japanese people and not by some filthy rich mountain jooo
>costs almost nothing

Why exactly do you hate it ?

>>17425217
because you can’t post images.

>>17425217
>>17425220
Forgot pic but i tried to del old post but it wants me to wait 20 hours or so

>>17425066
The black dude stole it, no doubt.

>>17423421
It is the greatest dive watch. They just need to release it in 40mm consistently and to the public.

R8 my new watch. It's a pawn shop score and I grabbed it fos less than threefiddy.

>>17425270
On its way to its home. :^)

>>17425270
>>17425273
Is that the Alabaster watch?

Reminder if your wrist is under 7” you should buy womens watches

>>17425184
>Berget
I think that's what I have too, it came highly recommended from a few forums.

>>17425270
>>17425273
It looks like late 90s media player as a watch.

>>17425270
>>17425273
looks like one of those AI pictures you get the first pass

>>17425282
It's an Oakley. :^$

>>17425270
>>17425273
It's crap. Worst than any seiko I've ever seen.

>>17425295
It's shit.

>>17425270
>>17425273

>>17425295
>he paid $350
>for an Oakley

I don't see anyone else posting their watches, you faggots.

>>17425270
>$350 FOR THE HUNK OF SHIT
30 casio shitters would've been a better investment than this

>>17425306
Here you go queerboy

>>17425309
>casio
>seiko
At least mine is not overly produced lmao

>>17425317
>thinks shitty oakley watch found in every mall anywhere isn't overproduced
Fucking kek

>>17425319
Numbers of casio/seiko I've seen around ptrob thousands
Numbers of Oakley I've seen around not more than a couple, five tops
You lost

>>17425322
Because the rest are all in a landfill.

>>17425322
I've lost my sides from seeing that piece of shit, that's for sure.

>>17425270
>>17425273
>>17425306
the absolute state of this thread

>>17425336
kek

>>17425270
>>17425273

>>17425317
Bitch, your watch is mass produced same as mine except yours is a garbage fashion watch with what ever cheapest garbage movement they could find stuffed in there, while mine are made by an actual watch company and an electronics company that specializes in watches. The only reason you don't see so many oakley watches is because very few people are such absolute tastlets.

>>17425345
>mine are made by an actual watch company and an electronics company that specializes in watches
NTA but yours are still quartz shitters, tho. Don't forget that.

>>17425349
That look better in every way, ahve proper movements and were a quarter of the price. Imagine paying $350 for an ugly shitter with Chinese movement jammed into it.

>>17425309
>>17425345
>>17425351
casois and soikoshitters really choosing to go toe to toe against the absolute lowest of the low huh

>>17425349
No fucking shit, thanks for pointing that out captain obvious.

>>17425354
Just wait till the Rolex guys show up, they're even worse.

>>17425372
Who do you think you're talking to there you idiot?

>>17425372
i don’t see the lolexshitters feeling the need to prove themselves against a literal mall watch.
>>17425374
rolex sucks cock.

>>17425379
>rolex sucks cock.
lol, poorfag

>>17425379
"I d-didn't want a Rolex anyway! I love my Axe Body Spray watch!"

>>17425380
>>17425382
way to prove me wrong lolexshitters, i guess you really are worse than the casois and soikotrannies

>>17425385
>coping this hard
If you're lucky you can return that shitheap and save up (lmao) for a real watch.

>>17425386
i’m pretty sure the faggot who bought that ugly ass mallwatch left a while ago to go cope over his shitter alone. you’re screaming into the wind.

Horrible threads.
>muh rolex is da best
>nah muh seiko is da best
>lmao poorfags
>lmao shitters
>lmao no taste
>dont cry
>fuck rolex guy
>soiko
It goes on and on, everytime.

>>17425391
One day we will all make it bros. These threads will be top to bottom Greubels.

>>17425396
greubel would be the ugliest independent if MB&F didn't exist.

>>17425399
No, that would be your mum if she didn't had a pimp.

>>17425404
you think about other peoples’ moms a lot, is there something you want to tell us?

>>17425405
Yes, your mum is a whore, but I do like whores.

>>17425407
now now, lets not get ahead of ourselves, we have all day to talk about your mother complex.

>>17425270
100 gecs watch

>>17425404
Kek

New: >>17425452
New: >>17425452
New: >>17425452
New: >>17425452
New: >>17425452
New: >>17425452
New: >>17425452

NEW THREAD
>>17425482
>>17425482
>>17425482
>>17425482

>>17425282
>Alabaster watch
I didn't think it's possible to make an uglier watch than this >>17425270 Oakley, but apparently i was wrong. The price is a bit funny as well.

>>17425066
>Implying anyone posts body on /fit/ anymore
Lol

>>17424950
that shitte looks like an anus

>>17424131
i have same wrist and OP 36 fits perfectly

To this day I haven't heard one person explain to me what the issue is with pocket watches.

>>17427519
nothing, they're great. Usually it's the person using them

My tissot is a luxury watch regardless of how upset it makes you. Google “tissot luxury watch?” And the computer will be like “yeah it is”. My 600 dollar watch turns heads, is luxaf, and has more heritage and history than most of the market.

>>17424581
Unfortunately true, with the only possible exception being >>17424642
which are often now just seen as boomercore, the watch of a washed-up, retired crook instead of a vital, active one. Rolex now comes across as a try-hard, nouveau riche brand, which is unfortunate because they are still well made for such a big name. But it's like buying a Bentley: you don't look like a connoisseur in one, but like a rapper who just signed a shitty contract and made a low IQ impulse buy

>>17427582
Based
>>17427519
If you're attractive, anything is cool. Imagine a hot chick with big tits pulling out a pocket watch hiding between her boobs and tucking it back after reading the time. You think anyone would dislike that?

The real problem is 99% of pocket watches in public are used by cringe steampunk people and people who hate these uglies latch onto the pocket watch

>>17427582
>>17427858
Imagine for a moment, a heavy-set man sitting at a bar wearing his brightest anime Hawaiian shirt donning a wooden sword at his waist. He flips out his pocket watch a few times every hour and let's it linger in his hands for a few seconds too long every time he check it.

>>17423879
The sterling silver one is pretty nice. Makes me wonder why sterling silver cases aren't more widespread though

>>17427859
Yeah exactly, he's uggo, hot chick could totally get away with that