/fa/ - Fashion

>>17393287
I like the Carrera, it reminds me of the 62GS.

>>17393292
It's the next watch on my list. Not sure what to choose between leather strap or metal bracelet. I want the leather one more, just like picrel. Looks like a great all-rounder watch but I'm not sure how accurate it is.

>>17393287
should I get the Carrera in the OP pic? I already have all the watches I want and need, there's no real reason to get it, but it has a certain appeal

>>17393296
Even if you like the strap better, it's always best to buy the watch on the bracelet.

>>17393296
>>17393299
I'd get the bracelet and buy the strap separately, may be harder though because they have 19mm lug width

>>17393300
>>17393301
Well then, I'll get it on the bracelet because I can't find it on the leather strap. I guess I'll order a leather strap from the AD.

>>17393296
Get the bracelet and buy the strap you like extra. If you're buying a watch ALWAYS buy the bracelet as well.

>>17393287
garbage watch, garbage brand

I'd rather wear a casio over this

>>17393308
>NYOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!
>YOU CAN'T LIKE A WATCH I DISLIKE!!!

anon, I...

>>17393306
You can buy any strap you want. I'd advise you to buy a few different ones so you can swap them to your liking. Changing straps is fun. The silver dial will go with anything.

>>17393310
I like the brown one like in the OP. Maybe a blue one works well too. Should I go OEM or should I get third party straps? If the latter, are there any good brands that sell high quality leather straps?

>>17393309
>watches are entirely... subjective!!
go wear a fake gold invicta zeus then

>>17393309
>you can’t
who are you quoting?

>>17393312
OEM straps could be pricey. You can't miss with Hirsch. Cheapestnatostraps.com has decent budget options. Depends on where you live and what's your budget. Other anons can suggest some more, i don't know that many.

If you claim Tudor is a cope brand you have to at least own a modern rolex and post it with timestamp.

>>17393316
that's the entire reason for the founding of that brand...

>>17393316
>y-you have to do as i say!
lmao, someone’s coping

>>17393316
What if i don't claim that Tudor is a cope brand, do i still have to at least own a modern Rolex and post it with timestamp?

>>17393329
Good morning.

>>17393329
>>17393336
They look terrible because they are so long.

>>17393339
Contrarian or just jealous?

>>17393316
>if you claim shit brand is a shit brand you have to post a slightly less shit brand

lmao

Stop acting like cavemen. Enjoy your watches lads.

I have this and the Omega Constellation/DeVille on my wishlist. These two and I can complete my 3 watch collection.

>>17393371
>has no watch to go /outdoors/ exercise/swimming in

you could add in a gshock. Its very very handy.

why are richard milles so expensive? they look pretty modern and onions, might as well be an apple watch

>>17393387
My current is a BB58. There goes a diver. I take it with me to the pool since I am in a landlocked third world shithole.

>>17393407
its for the ultra rich where money is not a real factor. They want the meme shock value so they can show it off to their other equally rich friends. Objectively, its absurd and ridiculous, but thats the point. They do have a lot of innovate material technology though.

Guten morgen /wt/

>>17393422
Nice. Is the antimagnetic one?

>>17393371
Which Connie/DeVille?
It seems if you have that Carrera, you wouldn't need the other. They're both semi-dress watches.

>>17393407
They are one of the only watch brands doing anything interesting with technology and construction that isn't just increasingly elaborate tourbillions and swiss men polishing surfaces.

>>17393422
Why the fuck won't they do a no date version with that dial?

>>17393455
38mm constellation, black dial with golden hands or a blue deville on a bracelet. I was also thinking about the Tudor Royal too.

>>17393442
Nah, less-cool little brother 556.

>>17393457
No date, no display caseback is the boring/utilitarian dream.

>>17393287
I saw a overweight balding middle aged guy stocking shelves at Target once but more than anything else his face portrayed the single most worn, defeated despair I have ever witnessed on a human visage, far beyond the most award winning tragedy film, while I was there wearing my Rolex and Yeezys.

For just a moment I was riddled with euphoria feeling truly above someone.

>>17393329
>>17393336

couple of sweet jayjays there

i've been considering a more dressy watch recently, and the reverso has a lot of appeal, but with a 7.5 inch wrist, i doubt i could carry it off

>watch new teddy video about grand seiko
>usually don’t like their watches too chunky and busy for me
> there’s actually one watch they show that I like a lot
>it’s the most expensive one and is $8000
Why does every watch I like cost $5000 +

>>17393464
Oh i forgot it had a display caseback too. Fuck that. Sinn has no business making watches with display casebacks

>>17393478
>Why does every watch I like cost $5000 +

because you have good taste ?

>>17393478
That is one of the worst GS models that's been released in the last 5 years. It's a bloated mess

>>17393484
focusing on cost is a very low class ghetto thing
>"did you know I bought ... for X dollars"
>"did you know this bag costs Y dollars"
>"did you know..."

a good product is a good product, the cost is secondary and doesn't add anything tangible to the goods itself

>>17393499
i'm afraid you're preaching to the choir here, anon; for me, price is irrelevant when compared to the quality of a piece and whether i think it has intrinsic value aside from its cost
i think perhaps you meant to link to the previous poster who has sensibilities outside his budget, and that's a tough position to be in, since he can't reasonably justify the purchase of something he really likes, possibly because he thinks eating and paying rent is somewhat important too

What’s happening here? https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMFsqqn7E/

>>17393474
Those are both the medium size Reversos. A size large would probably fit you.

ICE ICE BABY

>>17393516
cheers man, i'll take that onboard and maybe pop into an AD sometime soon

Has the Rolex bubble popped yet?

>>17393316
I have both & if my BB-58.925 had a braclet I’d be my favorite watch. Posted shots of all my collection is the last thread & apologize for the gay steering wheel shot but it’s the only one I got w/ the fabric strap.

>>17393520
bad setting

>>17393543
what car and year is that

>>17393543
>if my BB-58.925 had a braclet I’d be my favorite watch.
Agreed. It would make the price retarded but a silver bracelet would be neat.

I love the taupe dial and bezel insert but I prefer dive watches on a bracelet or, barring that, rubber.

>>17393561
In yesterdays thread someone posted it w/ a seiko jubilee braclet & it looked so dope. I’d never do it as I’d only put a Tudor braclet but after seeing it id gladly pay what ever they charged lol. All my other watches have steel plus I’m a silver bug when I heard it was coming out I had to get it.

>>17393560
A newer Audi S4 or S6.

>>17393560
2021 Audi S4. Off topic but I also just picked up a 1 of 250 made 1980s bmw alpina. Purchased for the same reason as why I buy watches, as a hard asset, I choose to put or keep my money in things I can hold & will retain there value.

>>17393561
>>17393592
that's the post >>17392482

>>17393561
>>17393592
Not that guy but I have an Uncle Seiko Jubilee for the BB58 and it works so much better than the original plus it has half links too. If you have a retarded wrist like I do which is 7inches but narrow and girthy, the OEM one won’t fit so I decided to sell it like a week after I got the watch back in 2019.

How shameless can Timex get. Jfc

>>17393656
lmao, i would have at least changed the arrow hand to dauphin hand

>>17393464
>no date
>utilitarian
The lack of a date window provides reduced utility

>>17393461
Great taste

>>17393682
lmfao you can get an Orient that looks 100x better than that shit

>>17393682
Interesting bracelet

What times is it?

>>17393682
Love the bracelet love the watch
Congrats

>>17393693
cope

>>17393693
post it

can someone point me to some nice no-date handwound dress watches? the only ones that I can find are nomos and junghans.

>>17393744
Budget?

>>17393742

>>17393747
sub 2 grand

>>17393748
Kek

>>17393656

This is a handwound quartz watch.
Your argument is invalid.

>>17393744
Long Jeans should have something for you.

>>17393744
>>17393749
If you're willing to go vintage, you can get some very nice dress watches from some really high end brands, that aren't the big 3, like Piaget, Chopard, etc. for around that.

It will require some hunting, patience and research, but those are free.

>>17393742

>>17393763
Nice. Jesus, that is really something. How'd a nitwit like you get to be so tasteful?

>>17393656
timex is just a terrible mixed bag

i much rather someone buy an aliexpress/san martin, etc. watch than something like this, at least in the former they are fully aware of its nature and they'll 110% get a much better value deal and quality

I met a girl at work (McDonald's) and let her put on my Pepsi that I took out a personal loan for 4 years ago for 5 minutes and she's texted me every day this week asking when I'm gonna "stop cyberstalking" her kek. don't make it so easy sweetie

>>17393777
Why does God waste trips on indecipherable shit like this

>>17393353
Eh, watches are meant to be status symbols and look "good," so naturally men will want to "compete" with their watches or taste in watches. Let the Trollexfags and the Omegeeks battle it out.

>>17393763
LOL What a piece of crap.

>>17393763
lmao

Just got my suede strap and buckle conversion butterfly clasp from holbens. Wooooo.

>>17393780
>watches are meant to be status symbols
over compensating small dick syndrome
douchebag revving his sports car at the red light only to go like 400m until the next one

Anon, what band should I get in your opinion for my old Junghans watch? I though about brown leather, but something smooth without much texture or something that looks like suede. Maybe with a beige seam.

Finally copped this week

cope, you wristlet retards

So /fa/, I'm in a military and suddenly needed the wristwatch on a budget as my last one broke. How did I do?

>>17393794
Oh absolutely. But that's the only form of competition some men can engage in. I'm not saying I think highly of it, but that's just what's the be expected.

>>17393825
Noice. Someday I want to get a stainless steel jubilee blus datejust

>>17393845
Personally i think this particular G-shock is ugly, but then again you are in the military where most of the stuff is ugly so it kinda fits. May it serve you well.

>>17393825
39mm? I’m jelly. I want one but I don’t want to pay Datejust prices for a used one.

>>17393869
Yeah, I know, right? G-shocks in general are a bit like that. One of these days, I'll get me some Tissot T-touch. Liked it a lot back in a day. Meanwhile, this will do nicely.

>>17393825
based

>>17393867
It's overrated imo, pic related

>>17393889
that looks really good. i like it

>>17393889
ooh sweet, does it come in a version with a coin ridge style around the bezel? I just love how its plain with just a tiny hint of flash

>>17393893
Yes it does, you can get the fluted or the smooth bezel

>>17393845
I hate that gshock with a vengeance. It has little shitty baby hands a thousand miles from the markets and then shitty tiny digital screen

You should have gotten a gshock digital, probably a square so you could read the time well on the cheap.

Thank you for your service but I hope that shitty visibility doesn't cost you if you're deployed

>>17393894
fluted with the jubilee is my eventual rolex watch for sure.

>>17393889
That’s because you didn’t get the fluted bezel you dickhead. That’s what I got and it’s tits.

>the perfect women doesn’t exi-

>he's wearing a watch with easily visible logos

I have never been attracted to the notion that a "brand" is cool. At best the product or service produced is cool, but the *image* of a brand being cool -- no way man. There is nothing cool to me about having an Apple computer, a Gucci bag, Fendi shoes, Dolce and Gabbanna pants, beyond the functional purpose and aesthetics of those products themselves. People who wear brand names emblazoned on their clothes -- "Guess Jeans", "The North Face" -- you are walking billboards. You *are paying that company* for the privilege of advertising their goods! How little must you think of yourself to not only give this service for free -- but pay for it!

Advertisements themselves -- I believe have a deliterious affect on human psychology. Television, internet, radio, signs, even email advertisements are constantly assaulting our senses, sight and hearing with things to buy -- trying to convince us using humor, sex and style that we will be better after trading our money for what they are selling. I am completely intolerant of advertisements in any form -- I change the radio in the car when an ad comes on, I don't watch television and I always have an ad blocker on my browser when using the web, I paid an extra $20 to remove ads from my Kindle ebook -- I really hate ads.

Now back to watches -- How much of a fucking narcassist does a watch maker need to be to put his fucking name on the watch face?? They want you to subconsciously see their name every fucking time you check the time! How often is that? fifteen, fifty times a day? This is after you pay potentially hundreds of dollars for the watch?? I will not be coerced to worship a brand -- especially a watch. And I will not advertise it to others who see my wrist. A brand of clothing or watch is not *my* brand and as such it needs to shut the hell up about who made it -- because otherwise it's off brand -- off *my* brand.

rolex explorer is such an ugly pos

>>17393908
>>he's wearing a watch with easily visible logos
thats almost every successful watch brand

>>17393909
it looks a bit too plain for me but its still very nice

>thats almost every successful watch brand

>>17393914
datejust is better. if i see an explorer it's always some old used 2006 piece of shit

>>17393915
uhh are you just proving my point? I dont follow

>uhh are you just proving my point? I dont follow

>>17393904
Problem is she steals it from you, nor for you.

>>17393604
>I choose to put or keep my money in things I can hold & will retain there value
>buys cars
hahahaah oh my god yeah, i'm sure in 5 years it will hold all its value lmao hahaahha It's an Audio bro, not a lambo

Hello guys. This is a watch thread right? Can you watch after my little children?

>>17393938
You can watch me get these doubles.

>>17393793
Suede is for pseuds. However, do you like the Baltic? I've wanted the black and white diver for some time now.

>>17393604
>I choose to put or keep my money in things I can hold & will retain there value
>bought a new Audi
ah yeah, people are gonna go crazy on craigslist for your 2021 audi in 50 years time

>>17393944
Suede is for suedes.

>>17393656
based

casios are unironically junk. would rather wear a fucking pagani over a casio

>>17393944
Love it. Sapphire crystal and sapphire bezel. Blue oil pattern looks so nice to me. Bezel is perfect. Every strap I put on it so far looks awesome.

>17393967
(You)

>>17393875
Nah it's the new 124270 36mm – wears surprisingly big on the rest (6.5in)

>>17393987
wrist*

>>17393825

>>17393987
I got mine sept 5th and wore it everyday since

Which one?

>>17393996
Middle or left.

>>17393287
help IDing this watch

>>17393996
Not the one on the left

>>17394023
looks like a shitty explorer homage with date window at the 3

>>17394034
Looks nothing like an Explorer.

>>17393996
The blue one is shit.

>>17394038
the 3-6-9 black dial is obviously explorer inspired. the case is pigfag and obviously not an explorer, that's why it's shitty. i was referring to the dial design

>>17394056
I see a 12-6-9 with a date at 3.

>>17393815
Just take it to a jeweler and have him show you different straps. See what you like. You could also try finding pics of the same watch online and see what other people are doing. Or even the original strap/bracelet on ads and other marketing material

>>17393794
FUCK YOU MOTHERFUCKER MY CAR IS FAST AS FUCK FASTER TJAN YOUR CAR AND MY WATCH IS FUCKING PRICELESS AND MORE SO THAN YOUR WATCH YOU BITCH

>>17394050
There are different colorways but yeah it's my least fav

>>17393996
>more like tackymetre

>>17393996
Middle

>>17393996
unless you're an international pilot in the 1970's needing to keep track of which day you're in, then you aren't going to get much practical use out of the left one
on the other hand, all three of them have strong aesthetics and if you're only into the looks then it would be hard to go wrong -- personally i'm a sucker for the race stylings of the automatic in the middle

what do you know about Straton as a company ?

Posted in the last thread like a retard. Which u50 would you go with? The silver or black bezel?

>>17394097
Black bezel

>>17394093
Not much, just that the founder is some guy that likes cars and watches. It's a microbrand with not a lot of heritage.

>>17394106
Also you're right about the 24 hour complication, didn't even notice it.

>>17394106
yeah, that's about what i remember from checking them out sometime last year

nice looking stuff though, paying homage to that very retro look; tempted to pick up an automatic myself now that i see them again

>>17393908

God forbid a company takes pride in its craft enough to stamp its name on it. Anyway, I skim-read your blog post, it is cancer and you sound like a 15-year-old commie. Grow up you fucking pseud.

>>17393908
That's why I wear a Panerai luminor flyback, although being fucking big nobody can see the name not even me

>>17393908
here's your $269 fashion watch, bro ($2 on aliexpress)
this is so on-brand for you.

Watchbros... did we just get called out?

>>17394167
This person ruined a perfectly good political joke which should've been more like:
>look at my sister (far right) with her ugly dress
>and my brother (even further right)

How do I explain the appeal of watchfaggotry to my non-watch friend? He always makes the argument that they’re “not practical” and talks about Garmin GPS watches and shit

>>17394167
>"Why Yes I hate trans people, how could you tell?"
>"You're wearing a Rolex"
>"Correct"

>>17393748
Idgaf that they’re all copying Tudor or whatever, this design is kino

>>17394179
the design is just all over the place. it's not cohesive

>>17394176
You either understand the appeal of luxury products or you don't. Is a Birkin practical? How about a Ferrari? There is no point trying to explain these concepts to people who don't get it. That's a central reason why these threads are so consistently shit.

>>17393985
>bro they're hecking GAWD TIER on the youtubes they said

>>17394176
Ask him why he doesn't live in a commie block house or drive a brutalist looking car that can only go the speed limit or why he eats anything besides gray nutrient supplement/tablet #14 (now with more artifical ingredients)

>>17394176
anyone that is into watches has come to term with the impracticality of watches. having said that, in my personal life I have found chronometers and timing bezels infinitely more useful than a smart watch or phone... or even a digital watch that doesn't have discrete stopwatch buttons.

>>17394185
How so anon? I mainly bought it because it’s thin, hard to find divers under 12-13 mm

>>17394194
check >>17394101 out

>>17393985
casio makes shit more overpriced than timex for the quality

>>17393996
give me the loaded gun

>>17394179
Frankly I agree, but I will never not be mad that my favorite CS color scheme is exclusive to 46mm. WRISTLET UPRISING NOW

>>17394208
this actually loooks pretty good

>>17394208
Strong red!

>>17394101
>>17394097
Neither, shit company.

>>17394219
how is sinn a shit company?

>>17394230
Literally Helmut Sinn himself left it because it became too shitty and went to Guinand instead.

>>17393937
I guess your not capable of reading. The car I’m speaking off recently sold for $175k (https://bringatrailer.com/listing/1984-bmw-alpina-b6-2-8l)) I bought it for $5k. Classic cars much like mechanical watches absolutely are a well established asset class. Sucks to be poor I guess.

>>17394240
Ok where do I buy a car for $5k and sell it for $175k, and which one, thanks.

>>17393287
>get vintage Seiko tank watch in the mail (with a 6530 movement)
>wear it and it seems fine
>get a small bit of water on it when I wash my hands
and now it's fucking stopped. Should I put it in a bag of rice or something or is it permanently fucked?

>>17394246
it's fucked retard

>>17394246
dead

>>17393753
Oh fuck really? Are you telling me this is the answer to what watch to bring when going caving IRL for an indefinite amount of time?

>>17394247
>>17394250
JUST. what a disappointment, jesus. Would it be a short or what? I'd figure with something as simple as a watch when the water is removed it would function again.

Am I better off looking for another tank watch or trying to replace the movement? And could I use some sort of liquid gasket material to make it water resistant?

>>17394252
No, the charge only lasts 3 days and it takes a solid 5-6 minutes of heavy winding (look at the size of that crown) to charge it.

>>17393825
Hell yeah

>>17394256
That's unfortunate, fun watch though

>>17394179
Their cases are the most uncomfortable I’ve ever worn

>>17394176
"They're jewellery but for men"

Wristlet here, need suggestions
> Bracelet strap, ideally gunmetal but open to regular silver
> 38mm or smaller face diameter

>>17394079
idk how people can complain that JLC’s design language is lacking when there is more consistency of design language in this image than there is in the entire calatrava line

Wristlet here, need suggestions
> Bracelet strap, ideally gunmetal but open to regular silver
> 38mm or smaller face diameter
> less than $200

>>17394242
It was a total fluke but I’m always on the lookout for such things, coworker bought a very clean early 2000s benz from a man who was going to a home. I found out he had zero family and was an executive for Samsung, i then asked if he had anything else, guns, watches, ect. He said he didn’t know but he had some “1980s race car” & I said I’d buy it on the spot. The guy came up w/ the figure & i obviously agreed. 5k isn’t the total price tho, needs about 20k in work & the guy (who had dementia) had a few weird requests like that he had to keep the steering wheel as his dead wife’s hands touched them. The one that sold for $175 is pretty much the best example in existence but once all the work is done mine will be close, again only 250 where ever made.

>>17394278
>less than $200
I doubt you'll find anything you like in that price range. Consider saving up more to get something you like.

>>17394280
Ok thanks I'll just play the lottery retard.

>>17394278
Pic related might be your only decent option

>>17394246
Don't know if it's automatic or not, but it can be serviced

>>17394290
really nice take on the type B flieger

What is the most Reddit watch? For some reason Seiko anything screams Reddit to me

>>17394290
>PVD

>>17394297
/wt/ think it's omega but it's really casio

>>17394081
>24hr subial

>>17394293
Quartz. Is that worth trying to service?

>>17394208
They need to make all of their CS 40mm and make them more available, they’d be a legit competitor to Seiko (or maybe orient lol) if they did

>>17393604
I agree with the physical assets but damn, cars are kind of a gamble.

>>17394270
I’ve noticed the case back is too deep, so it can feel like it’s pressing into your wrist more

>>17394253
Any pics of watch? I don’t have any tips btw

>>17394305
pretty sure it's that one seiko mecaquartz chronograph movement that has a 24hr subdial that's tied to the main hour hand. it's so stupid.

>>17394302
Oh yeah, omega definitely has strong Reddit vibes

>>17394297
>>17394297
Honestly can’t think of one. Watches are the only thing I look at on Reddit too, but hard to tell. I think there isn’t a Reddit watch but more a Reddit mindset. Getting too into the watch, calling it a tool watch, saying automatic watches are like an extension of yourself/art pieces, shit like that

>>17394297
>>17394302
>>17394319
the omega redditmaster is the canon reddit watch & brand

>>17394319
What's that watch? Looks nice.

>>17394321
For me, it’s the Omega x Swatch Speedmaster Mission to Uranus, purchased from DHgate for 25 dorra

>>17394322
Seamaster 300

>>17394313

>>17394324
lmao. im willing to bet it's higher quality than the real thing too.

>>17394330
The chronograph is sweeping too, small dials also work. desu this is really fucking nice for 25 bucks, but if this is what people spent 300 to 600 on then what the fuck

>>17394301
i took a break from /fa/
im glad to see you're still around
this will sound random and weird but i wanna give you a hug or something

and yes pvd sucks

>>17394307
Replacing the movement is fairly cheap instead and more easy and safe

>>17394326
Yeah, just what I thought. Is more easy to replace the movement >>17394394

God dammit
I really want to buy it and it's the last one available, but It's fucking $650 dollarinos. Should I just bite the bullet and buy it?

>>17394394
>>17394398
kek it actually started ticking again just now, but in the event that I do actually need to replace the movement, how would I source one? You can't find the 6530 movement anymore, unless you buy another vintage watch. Can you swap one movement for another of a similar size?

Like, if I wanted to put in a modern 2 hand movement, could that be done? I'd assume I'd have to fabricate somehow (maybe 3d print) the plastic piece that centers the movement in the case, but would I have to do anything else? Would the old hands fit on a new movement?

What watch does your gf/wife wear?

>>17394438
He doesn't like wearing watches. Rarely he'll wear my a168 casio. I'm gay

>>17394289
No just always be looking for opportunity, when one comes up take the risk, Could have been a total bust. Plenty of my schemes have been but some like this are massive winners. Mining Btc in 2012, reselling stupid shit in 2020 like gym equipment, inflatable pools, switches & other stupid shit people wanted during lockdown, having the personal connections to get any watch I want at retail. I made Vax cards w/ a template i found on pol and turned paper into $200 bills. I can name tons of shit like that take risks,some work some don’t. have the capital to take advantage when somthing comes your way. It’s not hard bro.

I need to know if I should pay $375 for a black Steinhart Ocean One. Looks to be in perfect shape with all packaging. Don't have a black diver yet.

i hat etudor so much

tudor is a rip off

>>17394438
She has a pretty nice Burberry watch which she sometimes wears

>>17394467
>>17394469
So, where did the Tudor's executive touched you? Are you sure you weren't asking for it?

>>17394324

>>17394475
Tudor rips off Rolex and peddles their junk which is as bad as Timex or Casio to make people feel like its rolex when ITS NOT IT FUCKING NOT

>>17394475
tudor ADs give the bad touch to anyone who wants a pelagos 39 at retail

>>17394479
So, maybe it easier if we ask you to just point where at the doll?

>>17394475
It's ok, you're at a safe place now. He might made you feel like a little girl, but we believe you're all man.

>>17394484
Meant for >>17394479

>>17394481
>>17394484
Coping TUPOORs in my thread? OUT!

So ket me gey this straight:
> /wt/ insists that Glycine being owned by Invicta means Glycine is shit, because it takes on the characteristics of the parent company
> /wt/ also insists that Tudor being owned by Rolex makes Tudor shit, because there is no conceivable way that it could take on characteristics of the parent company

>>17394494
Not WT, just a retarded moron that is pissed nobody is impressed by his dirty, 3k, beaten, barely excuse for a lolex.

>>17394494
Rolex isn’t the parent company, it’s a sister company

>>17394494
both chewdor and lolex are shit

>>17394239
he got tricked into selling because he thought he was about to die
>>17394097
ive went back and forth with that one. i want one also, the tegimented version. i think it would be a great work watch. i generally dont like black at all on watches, but that does work very well with that model. i think silver is the safer bet, but the black is very nice also.

>>17394240
>4 door audi
you were so close to having my appreciation

You're all gay

>>17394540
>casoi
lmao

>>17394413
Yeah, thanks for your helpful insight, faggots.

>>17394413
>>17394553
yeah go ahead and buy the fag rainbow g(ay)-shock lmao. here’s the purchase validation you wanted, homo

Datejust Turn O Graph is a based watch and I wish I had one.

>>17394413
I don't think it's worth quite that much, but if you like it and don't mind the price then go for it.

>>17394540
Noice

If the Casio F91 is entry level, what watch is exit level?

>>17394600
if you have to ask, you can’t afford it

>>17393329
What model is that? All reversos i see are so fking big but that one looks the right size. is it an older model?

>>17393329
>quartz

>>17394600
Audemars Piguet recently released a series of solid-colored watches that are in fact simply covered on all surfaces with one type of fine gemstone. One is all ruby, one is all emerald, one all blue sapphire, etc etc. They run for $500,000 a piece.

>>17394418
Well, that's really good news. You should ask your trusted local watchmaker todo do that kind of movement swap

>>17394600
FP Journe, A. Lange & Söhne, Patek Philippe, Audermars Piguet

>>17394438
She is wearing an Audemars Piguet

Pic related

>>17394658
Ugly broad

>>17393904
>the watches perceived value among collectors tripled after the incident

>>17394653
I know one guy but I'm not sure I really trust him. But I'll have to take it in anyway since it's keeping time at half speed, for some reason.

>>17394324
>mission to your anus?
sorry, I had to.

im looking for a metal bracelet for my alpinist, is there any actual difference between a 150 dollar strapcode and a 50 dollar ebay noname? im not paying the 1.5k people on ebay want for a genuine bracelet, and suspect strapcode is just a meme

>>17394608
Reverso Classique, 23x38mm. 6. 75 in wrist. 2003 model

>>17394644
Literally makes no difference to me as there's no seconds hand. Not into servicing every couple years

>>17394683
Don't worry too much you need to find a trusted watchmaker near your place
>>17394672
Show your wife

>>17394693
any tips on finding a trustworthy one?

>>17394139
>>17394164
t. mindless consumers

>>17394600
>what watch is exit level?
Casio AE1200

sorry for the shitty picture, but any idea what this watch is? I thought that it's a submariner at first, but the indices look very slim

>>17394708
submariner

>>17394023
looks like mike row has/had idk his own line of shitters called MRW.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/275305104192
logo looks similar as well as the design

>>17394280
did you know beforehand that it is that rare or did you just buy it and learn about it later?

>>17393904
A Crown For Every Achievement

>>17393908
>There is nothing cool to me about having an Apple computer
Apples ARM chips are absolutely ballin', fuck are you talking about?

>>17393313
Based.

>>17394738
>>17394740
>>17394746
Yo, which one of these watches would you be able to dress up with a leather strap, but also be okay for daily use, from a fashion perspective?

Open to recs. Looking for a silver watch, black face, solar powered (don't wanna fuck with any maintenence), and can strike a balance between dressy and smart casual with the right strap. Under $600

I'd appreciate it

>>17394748
kek

>>17394755
they're all generic faceless shitters, flip a coin and choose one

>>17394755
from top to bottom:
>interesting, but I don't like roman numerals
>imitates tag heuer
>lady watch diamonds/rhinestone
so I'd go with top, or bottom if you're a woman

Anons, what are your plans for 2023? I, for one, want to buy ZERO watches this year and save up so I can get a proper shitter.

>>17394755
From google images I think the middle one looks the best. Top is alright but the bezel looks weirdly flat.
Look up SNXS79 if you're not set on getting a quartz watch. I have the silver dial one. Other than changing the glass for sapphire I don't think I've ever maintained mine.

>>17394818
Stop making stupid jokes about AD's.
Knock-knock.

>>17394820
Who's there?

>>17394821
AD.

>>17394822
AD who?

>>17394823
AD's Nuts.

>>17394824
Are you german by any chance?

>>17394825
Nein.

>>17393901
same lol i got the same exact watch fluted and its awesome i love it. classic

Raymond Weil. Is this a good brand? I see their prices are okay-ish but not sure about the movements, are they COSC certified?

>>17394843
This is the one I have my eyes on.

>>17394889
/ct/ is that way
<------------

Good morning sirs, finally got a shirt tailored, is it supposed to fit like this where if I cross my arms or reach forward its that tight in the back with that much resistance? Rate the fitment
https://streamable.com/6javze

>>17395087
i swear this guy gets off on being laughed at

>>17395087
it's too tight under your arm, that's why there's a line from your shoulder down to the armhole when you are standing relaxed. You need more room in the back. Depending what your tailor did he may be able to add pleats in the back, but I guess it's already too late

>>17395090
Let me guess, tuck it in?

>>17395102
Guessing I should expect to pay up some more? Guessing fitment is 6/10?

datejust 36 or 41 for 6.5in wrist? At first I thought that the 41 is huge, but both look good from a distance. My gf thinks that 36 is a little better, maybe because the bezel is not that thick

You have 10k budget
You're allowed to buy a single watch and wear it for the rest of your life and throw away your shitters. What do you go for and why?

Is the Casio Lineage actually a good watch?

I'm eyeing it as a travel watch, because I like the way it looks, titanium is cool, and the atomic radio sync and its other features (including the digital countdown) seems nice. Although I may put it on a leather NATO to be a bit less conspicuous.

>>17395103
tuck yourself into a coffin already fag

>>17395116
I'm trying to make it, what does an upstanding citizen like you wear?

>>17395110
the datejust is a 36mm watch. the 41mm watch is only acceptable for a haute horologie sports watch like a RO or a nautilus where the size is meant to make it recognizable from a distance. the datejust isn’t that, it’s just an average steel sports watch, it shouldn’t be trying hard to be flashy or recognizable.

>>17395118
how about trying to fuck off instead

>>17395114
Casio f91w un-ironically

>>17395122
Why are you so assurt lol, the thread was dead

>>17395125
why are you such an attention whore lol, your asshole is blown out

>>17395128
I see the types of losers that post on this board with the shit clothing they wear, I figure the people ITT are more normal well adjusted posters so I come here (rarely) for tips

>>17395120
I see, I actually liked it better at a distance, the OP oyster bracelet looked more vulgar for some reason

>>17395129
you belong with the losers so fuck off to them

>>17395134
I dont dress like a yoloswagfag though

>>17395108
I don't know what you mean by paying up. The fit on your torso is good now, just the shoulders need more material

>>17395138
you are a fag and that’s more than enough

>>17395139
Paying the tailor to make more adjustments because he botched it.

>>17395087
really accentuates you childbearing hips

>>17395151
Lel, be nice

>>17395114
Casio Duro, black

Bros… I’m falling for Grande Soiko
I want it
I may buy it before Christmass

>>17395114
>wear it for the rest of your life
gshock volcano or some other super expensive gshock

you need a watch that can go everywhere
can't exactly wear a heavy diver to go jogging

>>17394413
You cold literally make one of these yourself by buying a white G-Shock and modding it. Paint-flick is the easiest and most overdone shit ever.

>>17395087
Hugging yourself part was kinda funny

Have you ever wore a watch on your dick?

>>17395194
What do you think I want the rainbow G-Shock for?
>>17394413

>>17395198
That’s funny

>>17395198
to tell the entire gay bar that you’re receiving

>>17393343
Not him but he’s just correct. You’re wrists are too womanly for the watch

>>17395176
Looks kinda good honestly. It would look good if you have average wrist size

>>17395250
>Not him but he’s just correct. You’re wrists are too womanly for the watch

are

you

mental

reversos were born in an era when men were generally of a slighter frame, ideally proportioned for the svelte gent who needed to know the time whether he was in the midst of boisterous chukker or a barrage of shells, so while the second pic is a little askew as to the placement of the piece, both have exactly the right size of watch for their wrists

new bread when?

>>17394699
I really don't know where you live, but it's not difficult to find one (or maybe you just live in the middle of nowhere?)

>>17395320
next year

>waiting on my new seiko to come in the mail

TIME FOR NEW!!

TREAD HAS BUMPED LIMIT< OLD BREAD OUT NEWWWW IN!

>>17394600
Dufour

>>17395445

new

how the fock do i change the digital time of pic related? i can change the alarms and stuff but not the upper digital time

>>17395458
read the fucking manual

>>17395461
i found it at a second hand store

>>17395462
google the serial model number

>>17395409
There are watch shops near me but I was just wondering what to look for to know the guy's good.

>>17394819
Thanks for the rec., but I think I am set on quartz just for the very accurate time keeping and durability

>>17394179
One of the best combat subs you can buy for the money. I passed up on a 200 dollar one and regret it

WHERE THE FUCK IS THE NEW THREAD

AP ANON PAY YOUR LACKEY MORE TO KEEP THE THREADS UP

What's the official /fa/ watch tierlist?

>>17396575
S Tier: Philippe Dufour
F Tier: Everything else