/fa/ - Fashion

>>17381086


Gasio.

Haha, shake AD's hand respectfully, ask how his/her day has been, try a watch or two out.

how long to get a rolex explorer 1 with no purchase history

My Seiko Sub arrived lads

>>17381203
Neat!

I never see anybody on this board talk about Fossils. Just picked this model on impulse, after it sat in my Amazon cart for nearly a year
D-did I fuck up, bros?

Last thread there were people giving me conflicting advice. I posted this watch a while back and I was told it was fake. Last thread, someone said it might not be. The same model watch definitely exists as 2231.50 ref, but how do I tell if it’s real?

Please explain as you would a 5th grader since I only know the very very basics about watches.

>>17381219
See https://imgur.com/a/Sw1FsAn

>>17381186
Grey is like a grand over retail now, just go for it, don't bother waiting.

>>17381226
Take it to store and ask them. (Also ask if it needs to be served or something too)

Is Tudor unironically better overall than Rolex now? Like I sure Rolex has technically some better shit but at the end of the day is Rolex too gaudy?

>>17381186
Grow a pair and buy something that doesn't require you to gargle someone's balls for the privilege of forking over a shitload of money

>>17381251
they're both shit

>>17381263
Post watch.

>>17381268
cope

>>17381275
You're poor haha no job?

>>17381289
my watch is more expensive than yours, i don’t feel the need to prove it to rolexfags though :)

>>17381203
Fuck you for paying $200+ for that Chinese garbage that shit up ebay with apam listings

>>17381206
>>17381186
Like 3 months, by then the economy and grey market will have collapsed that they're just sitting on shelves

>>17381226
It's probably real, people are fucking with you because they are assholes. If you really want know pay a jewler to open the back for you and take a few pictures of the movement, then look up what the real movement looks like, fakes just use some random Chinese garbage movement so it will look completely different

>>17381263
Uhh, share good watch brand pls

>>17381086
>tfw almost never wear a suit or formal attire
>have no chance to wear a dress watch
What do?

>>17381324
holy trinity, lange, jlc, journe, breguet, piaget

>>17381334
do JLC, breguet, and piaget really belong in the same sentence as lange and journe? for that matter do any of those belong in the same sentence as journe?

>>17381340
journe is great, but not as great as you apparently seem to think he is

>>17381219
>PVD

>your watch is shit
>refuses to post own watch
Opinion discarded.

>>17381376
cope

>>17381381
Talk shit, post watch

>>17381384
cope and cry more

>>17381390
You know the rules, boy

>>17381399
keep sobbing

>>17381401
Keep dilating

>>17381401
I’m actually smiling right now, your turn to post. Tick tock…

FEAR GOD AND DREAD NOUGHT

chuffed to bits lads. I wish I could show this watch to you in person, pictures don’t do it any justice

>>17381402
>>17381404
so many tears

Wasn't the anti-rolexfag itt outed as a literal tranny?
I don't have the screenshot on me.

>>17381420
>everyone who dislikes what i like is the same person
lmoa

>It's time to remember
Cope if you must, and you will.

>>17381428
Still waiting to see that watch.

>>17381432
still watching you sob and cry and moan and bitch

>>17381434
Show watch.

>>17381437
show tears... oh wait that's what you've been doing this entire time

>>17381438
See: >>17381437

>>17381439
see >>17381438

>>17381442
>>17381437

>>17381430
Is blancpain good? Do they have any entry level models that aren’t copes?

>>17381445
Do they have any entry level models at all?

>>17381444
>>17381438

>>17381439
>>17381442
You're both retarded

>>17381447
>>17381437

>>17381448
still crying, pretending to be someone else.

>>17381448
sob about it

>>17381449
>>17381438

>Still hasn't posted his watch
I win.

>>17381430
>ralph
>Louis Vuitton
>luxury
Why are fashion companies on the same level as legit watchmakers?
I thought all those fashion brands (Armani, Hugo, Michael Kors etc) made dogshit

>>17381456
R-Rolex-sama...

>>17381456
>still sobbing and bawling
i win

>>17381251
rolex has some gaudy shit, but their normal stuff is fine

Previously on the titanium Seiko saga
>ex gf gifted me a watch in 2006/7
>fifteen years pass, gf is long gone and watch is long dead
>I, a watch noob, was under the impression it was an automatic and asked for help getting it running
>you guys asked for the model #/any info
>I posted pics of manual
>you explain to me that it's a kinetic
Update
>took it to watch repair shop
>guy wants to run it through some sort of capacitor recharge machine for $45, I say it's 15 years old and probably needs a new one, he's pushy and insists recharge is the right way, I ask if it doesn't work will the $45 roll over to the cost of replacing the capacitor, he laughs in my face
>go to another watch repair shop, explain situation, they say $80-$100 to replace and service the watch, I agree
>they call me a few days later and day this is no kinetic, it's a standard quartz watch
>i say impossible, I have the box and manual and everything, they say well we're looking at it, it's quartz but we replaced the battery and it still doesn't run, needs a service too
>I think they're lying but agree jusy to get it over with
So $80 later I have it back and once again running and now I know that somehow 15 years ago I was given the wrong box/manual with it.
The end.

>>17381513
Oh and also I bought a DIY watch repair kit so I can change my own batteries from now on.

>>17381458
LV employs two genius watchmakers who make unbelievable haute joiallerie and other one off (or nearly one off) limited watches. Unfortunately these are almost always totally pre-allocated, so you will never see one in the store anywhere. Ralph Lauren has a good relationship with many manufacturers and has released multiple tourbillon pieces using IWC movements. It’s a passion project for him and I’m certain he loses money on the watch division, but the high end stuff is definitely worth a look.

>>17381430
>Nomos and Tag above Oris and Longines

>>17381513
Weird, well glad you got it working anon

>reddit swapping square gshock plastic bands for hybrid metal/plastic bracelets
is this a meme?

>>17381525
they’re all shitters bud

>>17381525
All the watches are shitters compared to Casio

>>17381513

If a watch is automatic you'll see a smooth second hand and with a quartz it'll jump each second, generally.

There are weird exceptions, Seiko has the Spring Drive which is quartz but with a smooth second hand and there are automatics with jumping seconds like the JLC Geophysic.

I have a quartz aquaracer and it has served me well. I have been on many adventures with it and I do actually use it diving. I am considering upgrading to a more high end mechanical watch I can give to my son when he's old enough. It's a choice between a Breitling Navitimer and an Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra. I would buy the Breitling from an AD and get the full warranty plus service but I would go grey market for the Omega because the savings are too high to ignore. Thoughts?

my NH35A shitter is running slow
wat do?

post your vintage pieces. 1960s Poljot alarm

Fellas need some help. I want to get my lovely grandma who has alzheimers a day/date ladies watch to help her keep track of the days, but the catch is that I need it in Spanish.
I've been looking but no luck so far, only thing I've sourced is an apple-shitter smartwatch. halp plz
Criteria
Sub-$200 preferred, up to $500
Ladies dress/field/daily beater
Quartz/Auto - no hand wound
Day/Date a must in Spanish

>>17381565
zvezda tank

>>17381568
I forgot to add, digital would work too

>>17381565
1959 Vostok Volna

>>17381568
The watches I've tried all have day in multiple languages, including Spanish usually. Just go to a store and cycle through the days on whatever watch you're interested in and see what it has.

>>17381570
Junk.

>>17381551
i think any watch your dad wore would be special. Im guessing the breitling would not be the chronograph model? those are bordering on thicc, but they do look good. Most of them come with a leather strap, which would help if you dont have thick wrists. The basic models have a basic movement in them, nothing too special, but the chrono versions do have a niceish movement in them. The omega is a pretty nice design i think. It perhaps suffers from being a little too safe or plain of a watch for some people. It doesnt have a micro-adjust bracelet, but the movements in them are quite good for the price. It will be a scratch magnet tho. The breitling is an iconic design, while the omega is more of a classic design. I think both would age well. Hate to be that guy, but an OP is basically in that same ballpark. You should probably go and try on each model on, and see what works best for you in person.

>>17381593
nice. never seen that dial variant before. here's my kirovskie crab

The only thing commie watches are good for is getting money by selling them to the same types who think commieblocks are a viable aesthetic (iodine deficient individuals).

>>17381596
gonna cry?

>>17381594
Are you talking digitals or in the sense of them willing to swap on the dial on an analog?
>>17381600
That ones sick! Whats the name reference on that one? Love Vostoks, but I dont read a lick of cyrillic. Pic rel, 63 year old ruski Radium still hard at work

>>17381607
I dont care for the politics or architecture, I just like vintage watches hombre

>>17381611
kirovskie crab brother. mid 50s

>>17381614
sick

>>17381612
Dubious claim, but go off.
>>17381609
May i interest you in Pooperskie Shitovskie Watch Rare Edition 1969 Hammer and Sickle RedStarOS? Only 999 Dollars!

>>17381621
nah man, i'm saving up for a TOOTER BLACK SHIELD. btw, haven't seen you post watch yet. for some reason people hate cheap, reliable mechanical watches that have interesting designs. half the fun is figuring out what movement or design was copied. huh. maybe you truly have been ruined by consumerism and feel that a piece of man jewlery HAS to be at least 5k for an entry level piece.

>>17381626
>maybe you truly have been ruined by consumerism and feel that a piece of man jewlery HAS to be at least 5k for an entry level piece.
Thank you for confirming all of my stereotypes about people who are into collecting commie junk. My only point was that certain types are going to overpay for things as long as they are s*viet. Not posting all of my Spongebob Invictas btw.

>>17381626
Did someone say Blackshield?

>>17381226
it's most likely real - this is a very niche model, back then fakes were not as easy to produce and not as good quality so a fake from the 90s would probably be of a much more popular ref

it's a nice watch, wish omega made a diver with this dial nowadays

just take it to ad for servicing (it probably needs it anyways if it wasn't ever serviced before) and they will tell you is anything is wrong with it

>>17381628
i paid 20 bucks for that and have never spent more than $100 on a russian watch. problem?

>>17381628
>still not posting watch
lol. also ignoring all of my points. when did i ever bring up people overpaying for commie junk? most of the shit on ebay are completely fake watches for tankies that have pictures of stalin and other bullshit on them. once you get past that you can find a totally new world of watches that are cheap, reliable, and interesting. gonna talk about any of that? oh ok, you will continue to go off of your preconceived notions about things you don't know about, nevermind.

>>17381609
jesus anon

>>17381636
Yeah, i wrote in my previous post that i'm not posting my Spongebobs. They are valuable and i plan to issue them as NFTs.
>where did i ever bring up people overpaying.
I did. That was the only point that i was making: commie watch market (the irony of it, huh) is a goldmine for suckers. Muh interesting movements is none of my concern, because what makes a a watch interesting isn't universal to everyone. There are people who collect half a million dollar erotic watches and there are people that are happy with their MVMNts, both have their own perception of what makes a watch great.

>>17381644
so we are not disagreeing about anything you insufferable nigger.

>>17381662
What are you even talking about at this point?

>>17381644
>NFT
>In 2022

>>17381664
Bro, the market is ready for a Generic NFT Iteration #374828253627. You're going to miss out on one in a lifetime chance to generate Virtual Re Estste Wealth.
Just Western Union me 5 billion dollars and i'll send you your personalized Spongebob Invicta NFTs.

>>17381536
>>17381536
It's more than a meme, it's taken off pretty well and it beats paying a grand for a gshock if you just want a metal case, all for like $60

Might seem peak cope for those swapping out the case on a GA-2100, but it's hella neat on a DW/GWM-5600/5610

>>17381551
The Omega SAT would be make for an easier daily wear piece than the Navitimer, I feel

>>17381563
It do be like that with the NH35
If you're on android, you could try out "Watch Accuracy Meter" and place your watch next to the mic for the app to see how fast/slow and hi/low the amplitude is. At least that'll save ya some cash before you decide you really want to tinker with it!

>>17381568
most seiko 5's sold in NA have english and spanish day/date windows at 3 o'clock, surely you can pick up a cheapo locally on facebook marketplace and whatnot. Sorry to hear about her condition

>>17381568
people who have Alzheimer's tend to forget how to read the time on a watch, it's one of the tests. If she can still read it that may help

>>17381219
tard

Interested in both a Tissot or Le Jour as a gift for brother. Thoughts on one brand over the other?

>New (casio digital) watch comes with something called an oyster clasp
>no instructions included on how to adjust it
Returned

>>17381420
That's a dangerous road. Im pro-Rolex AND a tranny

>>17381332
Wear it anyway.

>>17381748
it's obviously not user maintainable, casio knows its userbase and their mental capabilities, so they decided that this feat of engineering will have to be done by a certified battery changer

https://ciechanow.ski/mechanical-watch/
PUT
THIS
IN
OP
instead of arguing like homos

which model is it?
guy is selling it for 5$

>>17381825
Looks like a mumbai special, don't even spend $5 on it.

>>17381292
Sure thing, boss.

Every shitter posted here is a sad, SAD cope.
Not even ONE decent watch in the entire thread.

>>17381831
cry more

>>17381251
>Is Tudor unironically better overall than Rolex now
What is this level of cope?
Anyway,Omega is better than both of those

Should I get a Maen GMT, anons? I've been eyeing a GMT lately and this guy is 38mm and thin which suits my babby wrists perfectly. I'm also considering that one HAQ Grand Seiko GMT, or the 36mm Glycine Airman.

>>17381565

>>17381867
The name sounds like a cheeky joke for trannies.
>Maen, for a men that used to be women

>>17381867
I liked it but then realized that I would not use the functionality anyway and let it go

Classic elaborate perfection

>>17381876
nah it sounds more like one of those madeup words that trannies will use to invent a new gender, like womxn or faeself

>>17381636
>once you get past that you can find a totally new world of watches
Yeah and once you get past the taste of shit...

>>17381563
i’m telling eric

Lads, I need the real watch brand tier list.

>>17381600
I find russian watches to be nauseating but that dial is alright

>>17381975
Here

>>17381600
Shit nigga it's G O'clock!

What's a good watch for a woman

>>17381986
Cartier Tank

>>17381986
Grand S o y k o

>>17381565
Damn that screams soul

>>17381458
Used to be true but Hermes and LV make nice watches now. Gucci grip is cool for what it is, not many jump hour watches for under 2k, and parmagani is making watches for Armani now

>>17381332
>He needs a suit and tie to wear a watch
It's jewelry, you can wear it naked if you want to

>>17381251
Tudor better than Rolex
>pure cope

Are there sub 7 000 € watches from reputable names that don't use ETA movements or alike?

>>17381983
Does Dior actually make good watches? They are a fashion brand after all

>>17382116
are they not an ice cream company?

>>17381860
I’m trying to give omega a chance but honestly they didn’t excite me much at first. Felt like something Redditors or people who use android phones would be into. (Don’t get me wrong, I’m kind of a nerd)

Still way better than Seiko though.

>>17382127
>or people who use android phones would be into

Absolute gold

>>17382114
omega has some entry-level pieces around 5.5k

>>17382127
true, i wear omega and can confirm, android is the superior operating system
got my first iphone last ar and i hate that shit, worst piece of tech i ever owned

>>17381904
do the pajeets who sell fake Oris and Seikos from kolkata ruin the entire brand for you?

>>17382127
I use an android phone and my watch is a datejust leaf dial

>>17381986
Any watch you want, my wife use an Audemars Piguet

>>17381986
women shouldnt wear watches

>>17382114
Tudor's in-house

>>17381628
Stop using the word consumerism wrong
>the protection or promotion of the interests of consumers. "the growth of consumerism has led to many organizations improving their service to the customer"

>>17382163
And you shouldn't exists anymore, so kys

>inb4 hurr durr incel

is a black dial on a dress watch a no no?
i think it looks nice but i'm affraid it won't look right with anything other than black/white shirts
i think it would look wrong with a blue shirt

should i go for a white dial?

>>17382195
If you can, go with the white dial.

Post Pulsars

>>17382183
he said reputable names anon

>>17382195
literally just wear whatever you like

If I could afford it I would get an AP royal oak, bros...
But I'm poor...

>>17382225

>>17382254
thank god and your parents that you can't act on your poor taste

>>17382279
Blackshield the Tudor-energy

>>17382254
Based.
One of the best looking watches ever made.

>>17381430
Are there two Vostoks?

>>17382254
Buy a Zenith or if you're REALLY poor just buy a Tissot PRX and call it a day

15k to blow. Would you?

>>17382291
hell yeah, got it at 16, which is non arguably the edgiest age

>>17382382
lol no. Vacheron all day

>>17382382
post a more boring dial than this one, if it's even possible

>>17382254
Is your account balance $0.04?

I'm looking at an ad for the Samsung Galaxy smart watch and I'm having trouble pinning down exactly to whom this photo is supposed to appeal. As a guy in his 30s, certainly not me.

>>17382413
Apple fags, but they already have the apple watch

>>17382413
Zoomers, their entire personality is based on trends and the current trend that won't fucking die soon enough is the loud, faux-poor "I won't admit I'm too good for you" streetwear

>>17382443
>1960s
>entire personality of the youths is hippies
>1970s
>entire personality of the youths is disco
>1980s
>entire personality of the youths is mixed new-age fashiom
>1990s
>entire personality of the youths is futurism
Do i have to continue?

>>17382297
My wife have this AP, it's fucking based

/wt/ sisters... opinions about this kinetic Seiko?

>>17382484
the worse if not worst option for quartzes
either go full on battery or go something solar

>>17382484
>Kinetic
It's not worth it imo.

>>17382486
>>17382488

Thanks anons

>>17382484
why does it look like plastic?

>>17382473
You could discontinue breathing you despicable namefag

Are all divers watches a Rolex cope?

>>17382519
This isn't 2011 anymore, anon. Times have changed (pun intended).

>>17382254
ugliest of the integrated sports watches that anyone cares about

>>17382526
No, they are Blancpain copes.

>>17382443
>>17382413
Why do Zoomers want to see a bunch of crunchy old dudes looking like tranny children?

>>17382254
Thanks for the reminder never to buy an AP royal oak because tasteless poors want them

If a bunch of stupid poors know what your watch is then it's a bad choice.

>>17382503
>Titanium watch
>retard comments "Why it looks like plastic"

Kys zoomer

>>17381836
Ah hem
*Tink tink tink*

>>17382282
>>17382546
>>17382583

Holy cope

This type of jealousy from a watch or a brand watch makes it more exclusive

>>17382484
LOL, that's shite

Tudor Pelagos LHD or entry level JLC Polaris?

>>17382595
Don't project yourself anon

>>17382591
>Yeah you gotta buy what dem poors want!!!!!!

Yeah no, not going for negro tastes

>>17382402
I got like 400$ not counting rent/bills money

>>17382606
Any JLC beats the brakes off any Tudor. They're in a completely different class.

ROLEX BROS EMERGENCY COPE MEETING. Did we get too cocky this time?

>>17382646
This is what cope looks like.

>>17382672
It's just parallax effect. Distortion from the crystal. It's probably a fake. They're all like that. Mine's perfect. They make a million watches per year, something's bound to slip through the cracks, so give them a break! It's not like any of the poorfags here can afford one.

We good?

>not enough money for kino watches
>enough money for cope watches

>>17382681
I think you covered all the cope bases pretty succinctly.
Yeah, well done.

>>17382684
Don't fall for the gatekeeping anon, there's lots of nice watches you dig have to pay the equivalent of a home down payment for

>>17382591
the nautilus and the overseas are just better, sorry bro

>>17382698
and here we have exhibit 1 for cope watches

>>17382714
I do not care what your opinion is, 4chan user

>>17382728
so much anguish

>>17382735
Quit seething all over the board. Every time you reply you Betray your intent.

>>17382606
todor is cope
jlc is contrarian
pick your poison

>>17382759
>jlc is contrarian
counter to what?

>>17382764
It's not. JLC is one of those brands that you don't cross shop against anything. JLC is JLC.

>>17381570
Think you hit the jackpot anon, sincere lyrics thank you big hoss

>>17382754
such rage

What is an inexpensive watch that people who can afford and own expensive watches also buy?
Is there any cheap watch that also aren’t massive popular with the poors?

>>17382819
gshock

>>17382819
>What is an inexpensive watch that people who can afford and own expensive watches also buy?
Classic G-Shock square

>>17382819
>What is an inexpensive watch that people who can afford and own expensive watches also buy?
Rolex Datejust

>>17382606
Should I man up and go to the top of my budget for an entry level JLC though?

>>17382832
you should buy your favorite watch.

>>17382832
Yes, JLC is gigabased

Its hard to justify buying a GShock when smartwatches exist

>inb4 you can dive 200m with a gshock
Normal people don't dive and pro divers use real diving gear
>inb4 smartwatch wont survive a 100m fall
Well neither will you

>>17381346
I don't know what you mean by "great", I was mostly thinking about cost and exclusivity. what do you mean by "great"?

>>17382713
That's your taste dude

>>17382832
>entry level JLC
Get this idea out of your head. No one's going to be like "Pfft, you bought the cheapest JLC just for the brand." If you buy a JLC, you're already an oddball, whether you buy something complicated or not.

>>17382646
Cope and jealousy at the same time, maybe you are the nigger here

>>17382848
their battery charge is measured in years rather than hours.

is g-shock square /fa/

>>17382897
Unless you're stuck in a desert island without electricity for years that really isn't a problem

>>17382906
Yes, and they're fantastic watches to boot.

i hate tudor so much.. i fucking hate them for trying to steal rolex designs and pass them off as quality. its bullshjit and i hate it i hate it hate it i hate it

>>17382950
Nothing NOTHING can match me hatred ofr tupoor. its junk its trash its fuckinG trash its DOGSHIT

>>17382950
i love my tooter watch

>>17382955
COPE HAHAHAH COOOPE CHAHAHAHAHAHA COOOPE AND SEETHE HEHEHEH COPE MOTHER FUCKER COPE

>>17382970
?
post your gphg winner

>>17382848
>>17382913
Having to plug in my watch every couple week is a problem. My watch becoming obsolete in a couple of years is a problem. Breaking my watch is a problem. Getting annoying notifications on my watch is a problem. My watch knowing my biometrics is a problem. My watch being made by Apple, Samsung, et al. is a problem. Poking and smearing my watch with my finger like a caveman is a problem.

>>17382950
>trying to steal rolex designs
What? They're owned by Rolex.

>>17382976
They steal them from their parent company to make poors think they have a Rolex. It's disgusting. Sad. Misleading and honestly vomit INDUCING.

>>17382254
Just take out a loan and buy it. The value of that watch will only go up. Its basically free money and you get to flex on the poorfags in the meantime.

>>17382985
Disgusting waxed arms.

>>17382254
>>17382655
Just give Casio your money.

>>17382985
No, female Jerry Seinfeld, i'm not buying your watch.

>>17382996
Does it make the ladies wet?

>>17383006
lol

>>17383031
You didn't provide an answer anon...I checked our, seems like this Casio has Bluetooth connectivity, so potentially, it can make ladies wet. Lovelya!
Oh, and also turn on the humidifier.

>>17382985
>The value of that watch will only go up.

Anon, I....

>>17383058
Damn Rolex getting BTFO

>>17383058
Not the Swatch, nooo!

>>17382996
This a poor man "homage" of AP oak looks like

>>17382988
>>17383001
Cope posting

>>17382876
nah it’s just plain true. the odysseus and octo finissimo are better as well btw.

>>17383075
Proper.

>>17382852
quality and execution of complications, designs and finishing maybe? who fucking cares about cost and exclusivity you brainwashed moron.

>>17382979
Well, in my case I think their watches are fucking ugly specially the hour hands

>>17383084
Still your own comment and taste

>>17383058
Imagine buying a watch just because you like it

>>17383098
still coping and sobbing

>>17381086
Just picked this up on Monday, really like it.

>>17383108
I have info that Omega watches are going to rise in price because of the phrase "Omegalol" and its widespread adoption in the Internet communities.

>>17383111
I liked Omega before it was cool to like Omega..
Matthew McConaughey voice

>>17383118
"Just buy Swatch" – Keanu Reeves.

>>17381508

>accuse Rolex of being gaudy
>wears fake rivet bracelet

top kek watch fags are really something else

>>17383137
some of rolexs stuff is gaudy
i dont mind the bracelet, you cant even see it while wearing it

>>17383103
Nope, I'm not the dude shilling a watch brand here

>>17383149
you’re shilling AP lmao

>>17381226
>how do I tell if it’s real?
>Please explain as you would a 5th grader
bring it to a competent jeweler/watch dealer and pay to have it authenticated. or send it to Omega
it's that easy anon.
there's no other way for an inexperienced person to do it.

>>17381825
>which model is it?
B3N15

>>17382985
Giorgia Mondani - she and her husband publish some of the nicest books on Rolex.

>>17383058
holy trinity bros WTF HAPPENED

>>17381565
nice, im also ordering a poljot alarm

>>17382819

I've seen some expensive collections with a Seagull 1963 thrown in there.

For the second question, I've seen quite a few celebrities wear Bell and Ross which you can get used under $3000, but I'd guess a poor person might go for a used Omega or Cartier at that price for the name recognition.

>>17383108
That's a nice watch.

Here is my POS beater

>>17383248
Nice halios.

my miyota 9039 movement watch was +5 s/d since I got it a month ago. now suddenly it's -5 s/d. i've always had it dial facing up, the only difference now is the dial is up at an angle. that's like the tiniest difference ever. my miyota 9015 watches are +5~+10 in the same position in the watch box, why can't the 9039???

>>17383266
Changing the position could definitely have a noticeable effect. How much wind you have in it when you check also matters.

i hate this shit so much

>>17383277
So what? You can't afford it.

>>17383188
ty anon

That's why I'm saying that my wife wear an AP oak , she absolutely loves it

>>17382913
electricity addiction cope

>>17382906
yes, but that hairless ham you put it on isn't

>>17383277
nice tudor

>>17383281
thats why i wear a rolex

>>17383304
A beaten old lolex is not Haute Horlogerie, tard

>>17383277
it’s barely a vacheron, but that alone is enough to be better than any rolex or omegay

im saving up for this
thoughts?

>>17383321
You’re a couple years too late, it’s cringe again. Buy the 222 instead.

>>17383325
2 nazi crosses is too much bro..

>>17383321
just buy a rep of it

>>17383334
cope

>>17383321
Based and seething trigger.
I myself like the previous gen more, but still undeniably nice.

>>17383338
And this is poorfag cope LOL

>>17383342
im not spending 15k on a watch when I can use that money in infinitely better ways

>>17383344
So... poor. Got it.

>>17381518
Based

>>17383325
the 222 is a nigger watch like the RO and the nautilus, no rapper has been seen wearing an overseas yet.

>sapphire crystal
>quartz
>titanium case
>under $300
does such a thing exist anymore?

>>17383366
Yes

>>17383366
Got a Seiko like this for 250 this year

>>17383366
Orient titanium

>>17383366
Casio Lineage, and you get solar and radio.

>>17383366
Seiko, Casio, Orient, Citizen, Lorus,... all should have such a watch, yes.

Why are you plebs so poor?

>>17383465
because we buy rolexes

>>17383471
Show them then

>>17383465
Spent all money on expensive material items. By the way, does watch hobby actually give you something to talk about and meet new people with a common interest?
For example, car hobby sometimes I meet interesting people into cars and make a connection with them in some way.

>>17383478
I see you're coping.

>>17383479
By making justifications for my purchases? Yeah I guess but I try to not buy things for that reason solely

>>17383480
So... coping.

yeah, i drive fast. thats why i need a watch that can keep up with me

>>17383495
My watch runs faster than yours, it's 1 minute too fast every day.

>>17383495
Great Casio.

>>17383495
despite being the shittiest trinity watch it’s still the best personal watch posted in the whole thread. sad state of affairs

good cheap-ish black-gold watch?
found mostly casio duro and a168
don't really care about type, mostly the colors and that it's not a total piece of shit and can withstand being bit trashed at times

RECOMMEND SOME ACTUALLY GOOD WATCHES TO ME OR I'LL FUCKING KILL YOU! DON'T POST SHITTERS OR SOME CHEAP CHINK GARBAGE! POST UNIRONICALLY GOOD WATCHES RIGHT NOW OR I'LL LITERALLY FUCKING KILL YOU! WHAT THE FUCK ARE THE BEST BRANDS? WHAT THE FUCK ARE THE BEST MODELS? SHOW ME THE BEST FUCKING WATCHES OR I'LL FUCKING KILL YOU!

>>17383528
dufour simplicity

>>17383355
lmao

Also, Dave (British rapper) has a steel one.

>>17383531
>literal nazi brand
no thanks

>>17383495
get some better gloves, jesus

>>17383528
stowa

yes, im on hrt and yes, i think hitler did nothing wrong

Is it better not to wear a dress watch at all than wear a cheap (sub $100) one?

>>17383564
>muh watch rules
nobody gives a shit, wear whatever you want with whatever you wear

>>17383564
Just don't buy shitters.

>>17383583
>>17383583
>>17383583

>>17382606
Pelagos LHD absolutely no question.

The Polaris is a generic dive watch design that looks like it's from a microbrand. Even notorious JLC fanboy Tim Mosso has no love for the Polaris, while the LHD is an icon in its own right.

>>17383526
The Orient Tri-Star is stupid good for the price (I got mine for less than 80 euros)

>>17383531
literally who? meanwhile fucking michael jordan wears a 222. the niggerer watch seems obvious

>>17383495
Cool gloves bro, don't want to get blisters steering that car now, do you?

>>17383465
Because alcoholism