/fa/ - Fashion

>>17344435
Is a off white shirt like this more appropriate for this sort of style? I’m planning to acquire one and think it would look better than a regular white shirt when paired with green moleskin trousers.

where u niggas be buyin your wool trousers at

>>17346125
I don’t buy wool I buy cotton moleskins which are British/Commonwealth workers trousers from the Victorian-Edwardian Era but I’m pretty sure the wool fabric a in a lot of neofolk inspo is called “Loden.” Try searching that up.

>>17346119
I think so, yeah. I have a couple off white shirts that look rather nice with a both wool and cotton pants alike.
>>17346125
I buy mine primarily at thrift stores/ ebay. I also buy a lot on milsurp sites. Some of the infographics like pic related are good stepping off points to look for brands that have the desired look.

>>17346062
damn he had some quads

>>17346218
Whats if not too hot for wool?

>>17345916
all these fucking images but no clue where to even buy shit that is natural fibres anymore. Anyone got some stores for non luxury heritage material clothing?

>>17345916
w2c bottom left brown trousers

>>17348083
Besides maybe jeans, heritage is luxury. The market dictates that I guess. Maybe the real heritage clothing is just nice clothing that's more expensive than regular clothing.

But have you considered these 2 things: perhaps clothing isn't really meant to last longer than it's wearer is alive, and perhaps you should treat your clothing better?

And as for you question about buying natural fibers, maybe just look further than the mall. It is so easy to find 100% cotton t-shirts and collared shirts it is almost a joke to even point it out. As for wool dress pants, it is slightly more difficult and you actually can't buy the cheapest option. For natural fiber work clothing, you are in expensive territory. Why do you think that is?

I'll answer for you: it isn't practical given that synthetics are more durable, and for casual clothing, they stretch.

All of this is to say: either realize that not everything that is slightly more expensive than your mall clothing is luxury (and pay up) or just wear synthetics because they aren't all that bad.

>>17348083
>where do I get natural fibres
>linen shirt
>literally Zara tier

You’re welcome anon. Don’t buy anything else from them but the linen shirts. All the other stuff is not worth it.

>>17348552
I was meaning heritage materials and cuts. I realise i can buy some luxury dress trousers that are 100% wool but that isn't what i am looking for. I just want some itchy boiled wool. I don't mind paying a bit more than a regular item of clothing, that wasn't my point. I only own a few pairs of trousers, jumpers, and shirts and i take care of them and patch them when they get holes. I am not one of these people who hates all synthetic fabrics but there is a time and place for them.

>>17348735
I already have a few linen shirts from uniqlo and most zara ones are blended linen. I was not refering to >>17346119 but was asking about the image on >>17345916 that i keep on seeing.

>>17348801
Oh, sorry. I misunderstood. Maybe Johnson's Woolen Mills has what you want with heavy wool pants. L.L. Bean may have what you want as well, if you haven't already looked. These aren't exactly fashion items with good looking cuts, but again it's sort of difficult to have both. There is always the tailoring route but that might not be convenient. Le Laboureur and other brands make chore coats like in the picture you replied to, in wool and cotton including moleskin fabric. I'm not sure whether they're really still around, but Le Mont St. Michel also does similar chore coats. There are plenty of brands. If you're looking for something quite old fashioned, maybe even look at Townsend & Sons (you are in a Neofolk thread after all). Anyway, there are more brands I can't recall. For menswear basics, maybe look at Spier & Mackay. There is plenty to be found. I don't know whether some of these ship outside of the U.S., but good luck anyway.

i wanna steal their look what do I buy?

>>17344435
These threads are gonna be shit until people start posting their own fits again.

>>17350653
First you gotta toughen up by going as volunteer in the hardest and deadliest war humanity has ever witnessed. Charisma and looks will follow, if you survive.

>>17350653
whenever people say this shit i always think
>do they actually go out in public dressed like this
I only ever see people wearing jeans and a t-shirt or dress shirt/polo. ive never actually seen someone wear anything unique or interesting... even on my uni campus.

>>17349932
Not that anon, but thanks for the info

>>17350855
>>17350836
what are those kinds of pants called that theyre wearing?
and what about the shirts? ive never seen shirts with collars like that for sale in normie shops.
im pretty sure the ankle wrappings are called jodhpurs?

>>17350890
wait no the ankle wraps are called puttees

>>17350855
You're underestimating how hard it is to dress like squadrists.png
A big part of the "look" is coming from clothing that would be wildly impractical to wear today. The entire shape of the pants is created by "puttees": long strips of wool wrapped from the ankle to the knee. The boots are high heeled and hobnailed, and look absolutely gnome-like if you don't build the whole fit around them. Come to thing of it, everything looks fucking insane if you don't build the whole fit around it.
It's easy to look cool while wearing a few pieces of vintage. It's much tougher to look cool eating shit with your slippery metal boots and weird foot wraps.

>>17350653
>be me
>my mother sees a shirt on the internet
>anon I think you’d like this shirt
>the shirt looks nice and is made by a company I have other shirts from. These shirts are quite comfy and are actually the first shirts I got when I started to dress decently.
>Shirt is navy blue on the website
>Shirt comes
>it is actually a very dark blue
>so dark blue it looks black if I pair it with beige trousers
>unwittingly created a blackshirt fit even though I’m a conservative libertarian
>It actually looks pretty good
>I can wear it outside and it’s not socially unacceptable because fascists in my country (Britain) dress like emos if emos had muscles and fought in ww1

Pic rel is the shirt

>>17350900
Just wear tucked in vintage combat boots or jackbo4srrjhots bro

>>17350830
Jubub has the mind of a child

>>17344435
Really like this look. Got my eye on an East German Officer dress jacket that could make a decent base. What else would I need to pull it off without looking like a tryhard?

>>17351325
>without looking like a tryhard
you will, and then in 2 years you will be embarrassed

>>17351809
Point taken. It wouldn't feel right anyway, I'd look and feel like a poser.

>>17350830
w2c jacket? gorgeous fit

>>17350900
>and look absolutely gnome-like if you don't build the whole fit around them.
No they dont, this is just bootfag cope because anything that isnt the same old workboot last/silhouette triggers your autistic mind.

>>17350945
>fascists in my country dress like emos if emos had muscles

Please post a pic of this I'm trying to imagine what you're talking about

how often do you guys get your wool trousers/clothing dry cleaned

>>17352345
I mean with regards to the black turtlenecks and wearing all black instead of the black-beige combo the Italians went for. Admittedly it looks very visually striking especially for a 21st century Englishman who doesn’t subscribe to their ideology. When I see people in all black it’s generally a 12ish year old pseudo-chavs wearing jogger bottoms and a hoodie who’ll run off as soon as you threaten to call his parents because he’s making a ruckus, not a ww1 veteran who’s actually trying to make himself presentable and looks like he’ll beat the shit out of you if you piss him off.

>>17352430
koнaн..

>>17352303
It's a period USAAF B9 parka. A repro might be your best bet. Period holds up beautifully but you will likely need to take it to a furrier for the hood.

>>17345916
>the fucking artifacts on this image
holy shit

I feel weird about these threads, all of this looks like my dad's wardrobe. He's ex military, now taking care of forest and being a local priest. He often wears these old military gear leftovers that fairly neutral (as clearly uniform looking pieces are not allowed). Always practical and good for snow. Not bad though.

>>17352456
this looks so bad lmao

>>17352456
Don't listen to >>17352601. The fit looks nice, thank you for posting OC.

>>17344435
>without pol
>picrel

why u always said u want to suck a aryan boys penis with foreskin Douglas? is that the way u wanna tell us u r a gay and nazi without any evidence?

>>17350830
w2c sweater? Been looking for a similar turtleneck
Best fit in thread

>>17352787
it looks bad stop trolling

>>17352946
Repro of the ww2 English paratrooper rollneck by Aero Leather.
https://www.aeroleatherclothing.com/knitwear/paratrooper/knit003

>>17352966
I feel like the boots kinda ruin this fit a little, but at the same time I suspect this outfit was meant to include at least one outerwear leather that would have tied it together a bit more? As it is I get such an old vibe from the rest of the outfit and seeing that abrupt pivot at the ankle to a very typical modern pair of hiking boots feels very... "heading to a re-enactment, will swap out my boots when I get there."
Not bad otherwise, I like what you've posted so far.

>>17353004
Absolutely. I've done serious hikes in period footwear and decided that's just where I gotta draw the line.
Footwear for the outfit in cities, but whatever is most practical for any hikes longer than a night.

>>17353004
>at least one outerwear leather
*layer, fuck. Typo.
>>17353057
Yeah, that makes sense.

>>17352966
>>17353057
your boots are not period-correct you would be laughed out of any civil war re-enactment event

>>17353181
Does it look like he's at a civil war reenactment? No? Then who gives a fuck? This is a fashion board, not a cosplay board.

>>17352430
W2C some trousers like that.

>>17353057
>>17352966
Looks bad sorry. Commit to the look it dont. That half assed approach looks worse than a full costume

https://on.soundcloud.com/FwPN88LzWEBXyFcMA

>>17352452
are electric unicycles neofolk?

>>17353247
post fit

>>17353286
I don't dress like a pretend nazi sorry.

>>17352798
>why u always said u want to suck a aryan boys penis with foreskin Douglas? is that the way u wanna tell us u r a gay and nazi without any evidence?
You type like a gay man.

any recs for a winter jacket?

also i am wearing long johns and jeans outside but it's still too cold for my legs. how to stay warm?

>>17354048
me type like slashing your moms womb

>>17352798
Douglas P. saying he prefers uncut white cocks implies he has tried both uncut and non-white cocks, he simply prefers the latter

>t. beaner DI6 fan

also KKK captcha

>>17355377
if you like cock that means you are gay no matter what kind of cock it is

>inb4 homonazipilled