/fa/ - Fashion

It’s up!

https://youtu.be/7RDG3MHtBkQ

Cope if you must and you will

>>17261123
>>17261121
>2 ips in the thread
lol

Guys, we need to have this discussion. Divers are the UGLIEST and most pathetic watches. The stupid bezel looks like shit, and they are big and bulky. Only retarded boomers and incels like divers. None of you dive. Just stop. If you own or buy a diver, you're literally retarded. Just a dumb consumer dipshit buying what's popular.

>>17261143
retard alert

>>17261143
I agree divers are often ugly but some look decent and bezels are good for cooking actual food and not hot pockets.

>>17261141
the fact that the posts were almost exactly a minute apart should have given away that they are from the same person.

>>17261141
>the chartfag is also the retard who constantly shills poorfag watch YouTubers
Why am I not surprised?

>>17261162
why else do you think the threads always get shit up at the same time every day

>>17261161
>No omegay
>No lolex
>No casio or s o y k o
>No gay sexko
>No toothor
Based new chart

Cope and seethe poorfags

>>17261217
G A U D

>>17261217
this looks cheaper than most fakes

>>17261146
Sub 41-mm divers with 120-click bezels are the perfect companion for the pasta-cooking gentleman. I just wish there were more bi-directional bezel divers, it is much more useful for day-to-day, non-dive timing.

>>17261123
I just don't understand why Grand Seiko isn't on the same level as Omega

omeega

Cringe or kino?

>>17261250
They're filthy yellowskins.

>>17261250
I don't understand why Rolex is above them. In my opinion there should be a more detailed rating according to these criteria and the information should be visible in the chart, too:
>technical finesse?
- standard movements or in-house movements?
- complexity of their complications
>materials and finishing?
- use of quality materials, e.g. sapphire crystal
- alignment of hands and dial/indices
>further luxury?
- quality of dial texture
- use of precious materials

>>17261250
>>17261278
You two are coping already. Good.

>>17261250
the original chart on WUS has them on the same tier, the chartposter edited grand seiko to be a tier below

>>17261264
crino

>>17261250
>>17261278
Don't reply to a bait image.

which one bros

>>17261304

>>17261313
own one already, i want a less bulky casio

>>17261304
right. a digital in stainless steel just screams trying too hard to look classy, but you can't be classy with a digi. at least rock clean and sleek with right

>>17261143
Dangerously based

>>17261264
Depends on the wearer. For you, it's cringe.

>>17261304
Left one is stainless steel, but the bracelet does not look good.
I'd go with picrel for a daily wear, or the a700 you have posted otherwise.

>>17261329
> digital in stainless steel just screams trying too hard to look classy
The point of stainless steel is that you don't see plastic once it's beat up. The scratches might even look cool.
There is nothing classy about stainless steel.

>>17261217
Nice, invicta is finally getting the colabs they deserve

>>17261250
because Omega is still seething a hundred year later

>>17261330
the milanese might not be up your alley, but at least it's not stamped from head to toe like the one in your pic

>>17261340
You do you. I don't dislike milanese in general, I just think that it does not fit with this head.

>>17261217
Give it Isotretinoin, and it should be ok.

Any thoughts on the A158WA-1? I can get one for about 60% the usual prices I see for them.

>>17261366
this is the watch that broke me out of the habit of wearing watches on my right wrist. the backlight is hammered shit. otherwise looks really nice for a $20 watch, given the band is actually stainless steel.
this watch is also responsible for luring a buddy of mine away from the mindset of omegas being the only watch before rolex that have any sort of value.

any recs for a black/black square-shaped digital watch?

cant seem to find one that's not some G-Shock cookie-on-a-wrist when i'm looking for something just a bit slimmer

>>17261366
looks like shit, go for it

>>17261111
Is it worth the extra $50 for solar and atomic time synchronization on the g-shock with the red ring, or should I go for pic related instead and save the money?

>>17261404
Are you aiming for it purely for the retro look? Personally if I was looking at that price range I would look at the two dozen digital/analog models in various styles and colors instead or buy the cheap one you posted. Positive LCDs remind me of shit technology from when i was a kid so I don't really find them attractive.

>>17261404
5610 is smaller and fits much better unless you have 7.5in+ wrists, worth it just for that if you ask me

>>17261413
>Are you aiming for it purely for the retro look?
Not necessarily, but I have some serious nostalgia for the square g-shocks for some reason. I am considering an ana/digi model as a potential future purchase though.

>>17261418
>5610 is smaller and fits much better unless you have 7.5in+ wrists
My wrists are 7.75" so fit shouldn't be a problem. I was under the impression that both the one I posted and the 5610 were the same size, so I guess I need to look more closely at them.

>>17261420
in that case I wouldn't bother and just get the 5600, the battery lasts over a decade so solar is a meme and the atomic sync is a cool gimmick but the squares are +1/-1 at worst so it's not that important

>>17261404
Ive owned both, its nice having solar and auto time but i had to reset the time so infrequently usually just spring and autumn that maybe its not worth it to you.

The biggest question is, do you get the updated module with euro time format DD-MM rather than just MM-DD. I think its worth it, some don't like the new backlight though

>>17261143
Ugh, I know!
Ugh, I know, I know!
It's just that I'm not going diving!
Ugh, I know!

>>17261491
>poodor black gay
lol

>>17261494
I'm in the market for a formal watch, what would you suggest?

>>17261498
lange one

>>17261498

>>17261501
I would consider an 1815
>>17261502
I'm not really into the smart watch thing

I'm currently masturbating to JLCs previous gen ultra thin 38mm, which is actually really thin compared to their current version. According to tmosso, when it's serviced, the top watchmakers work on it because of the thin caliber. You can find them for 5-6k

>>17261143
I actually agree with this. I have a few myself because it's just a classic design that I felt like I needed to have. Rarely wear them though.

I think this one is a 34, but the 38 has the same case where they shaved off all the excess on the underside

>>17261498

>>17261143
Fuck off fag. Picrel just got my first luxury watch. It's an automatic so no batteries needed dipshit poorfag. Divers are the best

>>17261521
Very nice, single batons, the white is very pleasant, wish they still made it for the OP instead of the DJ. Not a huge fan of the DJ, and they're still both a little too sporty for a formal watch.

>>17261527
lmao

>>17261514
That's a lot of money for a Daniel Wellington knock off

>>17261527
https://youtu.be/GxHVn18M-us?t=311

>>17261527
very nice

>>17261534
Very nice, wow.

>>17261532
I'm not buying a sweede watch
I would buy a bambino before that

>>17261527
based brand
based watch
Overspenders BTFO

>>17261527
Beautiful. Wear it in good health!

>>17261527
How the fuck did you afford this?? What do you do for a living

Kikou Ibe

>>17261514
My nigga this us manual wind only too right?

>>17261143
rotating bezel is for shitters

>>17261576
Yes sir
>>17261577
Try exploring the inside of a moisturizer jar

>>17261521
literal perfection

>>17261514
>masturbating to watches
I knew I'm not the only one

>>17261252
>Buy a $6000 watch
>Put it on $0.5 worth of nylon
Why are we, watchfags like this?

>>17261596
Idk I've always found nylon/nato's really ugly and cheap looking. Leather or fuck off

>>17261278
It isn't.
Chartfag just liked them better.
There is nothing wrong to be autistic about personal opinions, but he should at least admit his chart is full of them

> Le Reddit collection

OMG IM GONNA DOOOOOOOT

Please tell you guys don’t just spend tens of thousands to get upvotes on Reddit fucking LMAO

rate

>>17261611
If I were this guy I’d sell it all for That new white gold yacht master with the falconseye dial

>>17261404
at the same price you cant get the the regular design (without the red ring) with tough solar but no atomic time synchronization. I chose the former because I didnt like the red ring

>>17261264
I hate the design of these old Casio ana-digi like the GA-100, GA-110 and similar. It's funny that they are some of the best selling G-Shocks of all time. Besides that the collaboration and design is pretty good. They did a nice job.

>>17261613
Dude people on r/watches Reddit don’t like expensive Rolex because it costs too much and they can’t afford it. Are you absolutely sure you want to risk those downvotes posting that?

Also what is a falcon eye dial please aware me. Also great taste and based.

>>17261143
*blocks ur path*

Attention watchjelqers:
I have been sent from the heavens above to explain to you all how to acquire every Rolex.

You will need three watches:
1) a submariner variant- ym1, GMT 2, deepsea, or if you’re extra poor the oyster perpetual or explorer (bezel poverty)
2) a datejust variant- date just, date just with day of week (if you’re too retarded to know which day and month you’re waging in), skydweller (if you can’t do time math for traveling with your credit card points)
3) Daytona (no variants but most you will be too poor to buy this anyway)
Optional #4: ym2 if you’re Turkish and or from Miami OR if chest hair is leaking out of your cologne soaked shirt)

And there you have everything Rolex has to offer and you are now done with your watch journey. What lies ahead is to take as many pictures of your collection then sell them, grow some taste, and go ultra-luxury where you can have the pinnacle of being admired on BOTH Reddit and 4chan for your impeccable taste (FP journe, VC, Lange, or any other unreasonably expensive watch that is so far away from plebs they can’t even muster the ability to be jealous of you)

Good luck and thanks.

>>17261626
this is absolutely hideous, what kind of point were you trying to prove with it?

>>17261647
why would i waste my time with lolex instead of just skipping straight to the ultra high end watches that i actually like

is it okay to like tag now?

>>17261404
If you have never had solar/atomic it will always be in the back of your head and you will never be fully satisfied without it. Once you get it you'll realize that in normal usage they are the same. I remember being strict about every one of my watches being solar/atomic when I started but years later it doesn't make any difference to me. There are things that are way more important to me than solar/atomic.

TLDR: The DW-5600 is the correct choice but you're not suppose to know that yet.

>>17261491
>>17261498
Tudor looks alright, but that riveted bracelet is kinda awful.

>>17261649
Its more stylish than most divers

>>17261650
Because you’re still working at McDonald’s and that’s a little bit of your range, let’s be honest here. Maybe if you start with the Oyster Perpetual a boomer may compliment you and promote you to manager. Baby steps anon, baby steps.

>>17261660
you wish, my next watch is going to be a VC and you can’t stop me.

>>17261658
not really no, it’s still fucking hideous. those waves on the dial look so cheap in person.

>>17261661
The cheapest watch of the holy trinity that will be surely impress.

>>17261611
I swear every single basic bitch reddit collection has the speedmaster and it's their holy grail

>>17261665
not my fault the overseas is the nicest of the big three’s sports watches. i’ll probably buy a lange after, but i just got a dress watch so i’m not really itching for another one anytime soon.

>>17261668
> not my fault the overseas is the nicest of the big three’s sports watches

Said no one ever. Holy cope. Also the hashbrowns are getting cold, time to go back to work.

>>17261674
the nautilus is more novel than it is stylish and the royal oak is just straight up ugly. quit posturing ESL.

>>17261655
I'll admit I would probably prefer it not to be, but it doesn't bother me at all, and you never see it when you wear it.

>>17261676

The watch which saved mechanical watches is the Royal Oak. Gerald Gente single-handedly saving mechanical watches with the Royal Oak, your pathetic overseas has this history:

“However, the Overseas was designed by the lesser-known Jörg Hysek, who had four years of experience working at Rolex under his belt“

Some no name loser who worked for Rolex anyway (the brand you pretend you’re too good for). I’m dying laughing please buy the overseas gray on a loan hehe

>>17261683
i dont care lol, i wear what i think looks nice not whatever has the most gay historical pretension. also the overseas wasn't designed by hysek, that was the 222. get your facts straight turdie worldie.

>>17261667
Yes, it’s the Reddit incarnate.

cop/not

>>17261730
feed it

Blue AR coating on a blue dial watch? Yes or no?

>>17261730
The display is absolute ass apparently. I'd cop this one

>>17261667
It’s one of the most popular luxury watches in the world. It’s a shame that more brands don’t make manual chronographs.

New Timex Q chronograph bros

>>17261123
but what about the lowest priced top tier vs the highest price low tier? like a $5,000 seiko vs a $5,000 piaget, or something like that?

Inquiring once again for interest in making a /wt/ version of this chart. Didn't get much response last time and you don't want an ignorant plebian like me doing this myself.

I'm thinking of organizing it in 7 tiers roughly paralleling the cope and seethe chart, with four watches per category (sports, diver, dress, etc, however many are needed) in each tier.

Can anybody recommend a decent analog watch that can keep time in two (preferably three) time zones concurrently? Budget is around $3,000.

>>17261755
>americans drive cars worth less than a decent wristwatch
do mutts realy?

>>17261762
Second hand Tudor GMT

>>17261664
idk i totally love the wave dial in peron

>>17261768
good for you bud, i wish i were so easily impressed.

>>17261767
literally a
>can't afford a rolex?
watch

>>17261770
>i wish i were so easily impressed.

>>17261772
fuck you faggot I asked for a rec around $3k and anon provided that my line of work is not conducive to wearing a watch I care greatly about.
>>17261767
thank you anon I’ll look into this

what is that one perfect watch you will wear when price is no bar

>>17261772
Literally no one care, faggot.

>>17261778
I’m sure some anons will go with six or seven digit options and kvetch and my choice but I’d probably go with a piaget polo skeleton.

>>17261764
You do know that /wt/ is the poorest general on 4chan, right?

Thoughts on my smol casio collection?

What's up, my good friends?
How are you this fine friday and what are you wearing today?

>>17261776
take the selfies to >>>/soc/ bud

>>17261805
Why did you buy the same watch so many times when Casio offers a wide variety of styles and feature sets.

>>17261805
Nice. Jesus, that is something.

>>17261807
That's a very nice green anon
I'm wearing the Fugu today

Getting sick of these dual register chronos

>>17261809
autistic people are known for hyperfixating on a single thing.

>>17261805
that one with the price tag looks cool, seems like it's super thin. I would keep that one and get rid of the rest. I agree with the other dude, you don't need multiples of the same style, just one good solid example of it

>>17261755
Interested!

>>17261143
how do you explain this beautiful watch then?

>>17261143
agreed. my eyes gloss over every single diver watch, they all look exactly the same. none of them are interesting.

>>17261814
They're called bicompax, numbnuts

>>17261830
Rolex cope/1000

>>17261846
>>17261830
keeps more accurate time than any rolex

>>17261143
You're an asshole. Divers are classics. Beautiful and timeless. The bezel has a lot of functionality too.

>>17261844

Good afternoon, gentlemen. I'm here to mog

>>17261844

>>17261866
good morning sirs

>>17261866
Mog #2

>>17261866
>black
>mog
At least pay child support first ok?

>>17261871
Poorfag detected

I haven't been here in about a year, has seiko gotten any more jewish since last time?

R8. Hoping to add a Bathyscaphe chrono sometime in the future. It’s the one watch that makes my pp tingle that isn’t a Rawlecks or Patek.

>>17261809
Have to admit I got carried away with the a168 design
>>17261811
Which one should I get next u think?>>17261814
No u
>>17261823
The one with the price tag cost me a small fortune compared to all the others though

>>17261730
Not. The white strap will get dirty fast.

>>17261866
>>17261870
did you rob a footballer?

>>17261805
very cute
>>17261809
You'll understand when you find your favorite watch. All that's left is to get all the colors and variants you like.

>>17261807
Hola Senör

>>17261870
thumbnail looks like a disgusted smiley

>>17261755
in the grand scheme, watches are gay, and nobody should bother with anything beyond like $600

>>17261866

>>17261939
>god damn, I love being rural, poor white trash
Translated meme

>>17261866
>>17261870
Proof that nothing looks good on shitskin.

>>17261948
Cope and seethe poorfag casio lover, cope and seethe

>>17261941
>Translated meme

lmao at these angry little impotent polcels seething over based rich blackbro

>>17261807

Thinking of putting this in one of the aliexpress submariner cases

good afternooning sirs. Got a silicone strap super comfy now

>All the wealthy people in this thread have been sicarios and black people
Lmfao. White bois seething!

>>17261958
Go for it. Mods are dumb but it strangely looks good when it fits correctly.

Redpill me on reps bros

I wanna buy a cartier rep, ideally a vintage? Where can I buy the best reps? Will they ever sell vintage tanks?

I'm starting to consider a fake Santos...

>>17261998
read the r/reptime pinned post
best you can do is a santos, all others will be trash, all vintage reps are also trash

>>17261998
>redpill me on reps
stop being poor and cringe and white

>>17261998

>>17262005
what if he wants to place the rep in his safe as a honeypot for burglars?

>>17262029
poorfag fantasy cope

>>17261998
They're pointless unless you plan to go all out and fake who you are, like fake facebook, fake wedding band, fake photoshopped pictures of your fake wife in your phone, fake name, lie that you're a wealthy businessman, rent a corvette, rent a nice airbnb, et cetera. Why would you do this? Easier sex from shallow women, i guess, or just to lie to yourself and play pretend?

otherwise, it will make no sense for a 20 something to own a $30,000 watch and everybody will just deduce that it's fake

>>17262041
be careful of rawlecks owners pysops, these people like to cope A LOT because they regret buying an overpriced watch and making their wife fuck the AD for the right to even buy it in the first place

Wearing a fake is the ultimate and final cuck.

>>17261161
AP is a nigger brand and everyone knows it

>>17262045
that's erroneous. i think luxury watches are gay; marketing, materialism, et cetera.

>>17262028

Return to g shock

>>17261767
i love this red and blue more than the rolex version

>>17261807
What’s that, the Heineken?

>>17261844
Ur mum is bicompact

What do you guys think? I can buy this right now but wanna get opinions. Free hat if I get it

>>17262076
Yours is tricompact.

>>17262133
I like black or blue dial better, but that's the same exact model I'd choose

>>17262076

>>17262133
Very nice watch, this is the old OP39?

>>17262149
Yeah it's a pre-owned model. The only one they have in stock.

>>17262133
Hat is worth it. Rolex swag is even more rare than the pieces

>bought solid gold watch on eBay, took advantage of ebay's $200+ off any luxury watch purchase of 2000 or more
>seller got upset that watch sold for less than they expected
>made up a bullshit reason to cancel my order and relisted it for $400 more
>Ebay's watch promotion is now over

What a cocksucker. I'm so annoyed.

>>17261304
Casio finally made one of these without a plastic MOP look dial and the put it on a milinase out of spite. They make a watch that people have been clamoring for for years and they seem determined to make sure nobody buys one.

>>17262173
if I saw that on the street I wouldn't pick it up jesus how fucking ugly that is man

>>17262176
You need to take that shitter off and get some sun

>>17262176
the only good sports lolex ever

>>17261498
Used 33 or 34 mm handwinding piaget, in yellow gold
Used girard perregaux 1966 38mm off of chrono 24

>>17262175
Looks good to me. Better than another faggot dive watch, that's for sure

>>17261751
>24hr subdial
I am fucking sick of seiko selling so damn many of these movements $5 each. Discontinuing the mecha quartz would be a massive service to the watch hobby and the world in general.

>>17261962
Good seiko

>>17262133
Yeah, single baton op is dope

>>17262173
You can try reporting them for reslisting it but ebay probably won't do anything

>>17262185
This is a nice option

>>17261807
Dammit, I honestly dig that green a lot

>been trying to find a steel digital watch that has 20mm lugs
>looking at overpriced Japanese eBay
>go to retirement center garage sale today
>find this for $10
DW-1500, $200 from Japan on ebay
Broke the bezel while cleaning the 40 years of dead skin off of it, but I love it. I guess it's in the same series as those desirable titanium casios.

>>17262264
Neat

>>17261626
This is the best example of why divers are a dead end design-wise.

>>17262159
I hope you walked out with it. It's one of the best models they made in the last decade.

Alright Rolex cucks, let’s do this. Make me laff.

>>17262340
Get you tell me why is the largest fetish among zoomer girls is piss?

>>17262362
Is this true? Can any girls confirm?

>>17262340
>MFW my high-end watch collection.

>>17261264
kinge

My vintage seiko quartz doesn't seem to be working. Put a new battery in and the second hands starts ticking but minute and hour doesn't move. All hands move properly when the crown is pulled and in time setting mode. Is this a loose cannon pinion? How hard is it to get it fixed.

>>17262388
Did you short it after putting in the new battery? Look up vidoes or some guide online but that is probably your issue

>>17262388
the cannon pinion is loose on the center arbor

you need to tighten it and it's a bitch to do (if it's steel it can crack)

>>17261612
Nice. Had the same W-S210H. Great little watch, too bad I had to sell it to cash in

>>17262264
Great catch anon

>>17262264
Shame about the bezel but it's still amazing. I wish 3D printing fulfilled its promise to make things like that easy to make.

>>17261745
Yes, the crystal should be blue as well. The case and hands should be made out of blued steel, and you should wear blue clothes too. And don't forget to drink plenty of coloidal silver so your skin turns blue as well.

>>17261653
>If you have never had solar/atomic it will always be in the back of your head and you will never be fully satisfied without it.
I think you're right, since it's my first G-Shock I'll definitely end up regretting it if I don't get it. I think I'll go for the 5610 with solar and atomic time now and try to convince myself it isn't necessary for future purchases.

>>17262264
eBay for item 255215660339
it will fit your DW-1500

>>17261870
This is nice, i love how it's not a chrono.

>>17262394
What do you mean shorting it? I just put the battery in. I don't think it was touching any metal

>>17262427
>What do you mean shorting it?
You are supposed to touch two different parts of the movement with a pice of metal after you change the battery, look it up

>>17262429
quartzbros...

>i have a ddlg fetish
best watch for me?

>>17262431
invicta/cartier

>>17262429
I see two metal contacts. Is the battery suppose to fit underneath the small metal one

>>17262431
down down long gay fetish?

Why have this general made me so racist?

>>17262431
Are you the dd, or the lg?

>>17262437
you need to learn how a watch actually works that dude is fucking with you

>>17261807
My divers watch, I went hiking today. Breddy gud day

>>17262451
imagine unironically doing this

>>17262448
Yeah no idea wtf he is saying. I'm thinking it's a loose pinion but he threw me for a loop

>>17262458
Im saying you are a stupid nigger that is incapable of using a search engine. Fucking hell, i tell you how to fix it and you just stomp your feet and demand i spoonfeed you instead of putting the words from my post into google

What watch should I buy to impress a girl like Dua?

>>17262491
>girl
>that
>female

LOL. Oh sweet Summer child.

>>17262497
Dua Lipa is a very beautiful biological female, you inbred.

Would a quartz or a mechanical watch be more vulnerable to magnets?

Gentleman, i present to you the most boring man alive, courtesy of le Reddit.

>>17262508
that constantin is based

New sailcloth strap came in today. Not sure if it's tough to bend because it's chinese or if it's normally like that.

>>17262518
Sits well with the watch.

Love my speedy :)

>>17262531
at least the crystal on this one doesn't pop off in space lol

>>17262530
Thanks! Got a blue variant as well and they both honestly do look neat.

>>17262518
zelos... losez...

Would you guys ever get a luxury or rare watch on chrono? How do you make sure it's authentic?

>>17262550
you buy from a seller with a lot of reviews. same goes for wus.

>>17262554
Is it also better to buy from professional dealers? Actually, can anyone make an account as a pro dealer or is there any kind of verification?

>they don't buy their watches with hard cash like a king

>>17262571
>like a poorfag with credit score below 800
>no amex black
ftfy

>>17261870
>>17261866
Don't want to be rude but you should've spent your money on other stuff.
It looks misplaced on your wrist

>>17262550
Do people actually buy from chrono? It seems like the worst of both worlds, sketchy and expensive.

>>17262580
He stole them.

>>17261890
The sector and rolex look ugly. I'm not usually a fan of speedmasters but it looks good here. Seiko and citizen are nice. Hamilton looks weird. G-Shocks are a good start but you should get upgraded models if you like them or just get rid of them if you don't. It's not a collection I would own but you seem to have some eclectic and weird tastes that go well together. 2/10 for me, 7/10 for you.

>He thinks having a measly amex is a true measure of wealth.
>He willingly leaves a trail of his high expenses so the government can fuck with him.
Oh, you poor, poor plebs.
You either buy your watches with HARD CASH, or you're just a dirtpoor group of provincials without class.

its over
grand seiko is finished

>>17262611
>can't spend the 100k a month minimum to get an amex black
poorfag alert

>>17262625
zaratsu finished

hahaheheheheheohohoho

>>17262447
both

>>17262580
What's important is that I like it. I have plenty of watches.

>>17262765
hi lil nas x

>>17262765
How did you get the money? Maybe you are trying to troll people by their jelly but I like your watches and I’m not sure even mad. They’re good choices, enjoy them in good health.

>>17262771
There's no reason for anyone to be mad. I'm just joking about mogging. I like watches, that's it. I own an IT company in Texas.

>>17262765
>>17262776
Shitskin

>>17262785
I think he’s Indian

>>17262792
I'm black.

>>17262776
Can post full collection?

>>17262785
tudor/bois imperial shill btfo

>>17262785
poor jelly seething frenchie rural freak

See some people breaking out the big guns. Good thread so far! Here's my humble collection.
From left to right:
FPJ Elegante 48 Titalyt
FPJ CS Havana Pt
Rolex OP 34mm
Rolex 126610LV
De Bethune DB25 Starry Varius piece unique

>>17262800
the op color is the best out right now. a shame about the purple one getting destroyed

>>17262800
Jesus fucking christ. Send me money

Opinions on pocket watches.

>>17262800
>5 empty spots
what are you pore lmao?

>>17261217
Gee it sure showed me. For sure it tells time better than my phone. And is less likely to be stolen by nignogs

>>17261923
Absolutely beautiful, this is my grail watch.

>>17262508
That rubber strap on the Overseas is disgraceful, I would slaughter this man if I ever saw him on the streets.

>>17262807
do you want people to think you like steampunk?

>>17262823
okai buddi, wut colour is your Bugatti?

Perfection

>>17262866
orrange?

https://www.fratellowatches.com/tudor-watches-2022-high-range/
Yep I'm thinking us Tudorchads won this one.

>>17262927
yeah the no taste gay olympics

>>17262930
Boohoo craker

>>17262897
Why would you need a watch to tell you what month it is?

>>17262935
wait til you find out that you don't actually need a watch to tell you the time either because your phone is more accurate.

>>17261111
Just bought one of these. What am I in for?

>>17262961
looking like a poor person

>>17262961
A meal at the Salvation Army I guess?

First lume shot with my grail Speedy. Green lume really fits the watch and is so pretty.

>>17262968
reddit watch

>>17262968
Congrats
Don't forget to color correct your pics, anon.

>>17262968

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxY9Rvbt-tI

>>17262961
The bambino is actually pretty solid for the price, I have a V4 that I use as my beater watch.

>>17261866
Should've bought a flashy Royal Oak or anything else your rappers wear.

>>17262978
Perfection

>>17262776
>I own an IT company in Texas.
So street shitter not nigger?

>>17262961
Kino

Is there a better dive watch smaller than 42mm around $1000?

>>17261941
>white trash
As opposed to what, brown trash?

>>17262968
ayo nigga this is u
https://old.reddit.com/r/Watches/comments/xmlcef/omega_speedmaster_moon_lume/
reddit ass watch

>>17261748
which one is this

>>17263031
Not readily available unfortunately.

>>17261772
More like a
>can't be arsed waiting 6 years and buying several lady oysterquartz before being allowed to purchase a watch you can already pay for
watch

>>17262978
peen!

>>17263035
It's so weird, you can get more information from someone's reddit account than their facebook. A day trader in DC with a seiko collection just got a new speedmaster. If I had time or interest I could probably find out his address.

>>17263066
your average normalfag has no comprehension of the idea of opsec

>>17263085
>>17263085
>>17263085