/fa/ - Fashion

>>17260717
and that's a problem because...

>>17260724
It's a problem because I don't like women exposing themselves so much. I think it looks better when women leave more to the imagination. I don't mean a full on burka but is a t-shirt and knee-length shorts too much to ask over a crop top and booty shorts?

i love it when girls have really long hair so its like near or past the end of her shorts/skirt and brushing against her legs
very rare but really top tier

>>17260729
not even homosexuals are this gay...

>>17260735
Gay...oh come on people. I do like women. Just more modestly dressed. Is that too much to ask for? You don't see guys in a crop top and booty shorts. Clothes of that sort just seem too attention-seeking to me.

>>17260740
>You don't see guys in a crop top and booty shorts.
We should change that.

>>17260731
That seems oddly specific and hmmm...I never really thought about it. Seems like that would be really long hair or a really short skirt/shorts though. Kind of hard to picture.

>>17260747
Really. There are lots of guys who need to be wearing booty shorts

>>17260747
Oh God please no...I don't even think it looks good on women. Seems too attention-seeking.

>>17260717
if i’m on a date and she’s wearing that
ik there’s a HIGH possibility she would be down to fuck

I see your point, I don't agree or disagree because I'm not sure if it even matters either way, but god you're so fucking insufferable in the way you talk.

>>17260759
It matters because there's no good reason for women's shorts to be so short, when they could be to the knee just like men's. How am I insufferable though? I'm just being honest.

>>17260766
You being insufferable has nothing to do with the subject matter, but you are kind of being a prude so that doesn't help your case. Its entirely in the way you talk. Again, its not about the subject matter, but the subject isn't helping the fact that you come off as someone who doesn't often go outside for anything but work based on the way you type. And there's nothing wrong with being revealing at all, that's a major perk of the current era in which people are allowed to present themselves more authentically. The only thing that this causes is for men to get horny I guess and for women to attract more men, but generally guys will get a bit perked up by the sight of an attractive woman regardless of them having short shorts. It literally does no harm, you're just being lame, I don't know how else to put this. There isn't an objective rational reason for this to be a problem in a civilized society where rape by strangers on the street is wildly uncommon.

>>17260740
>Clothes of that sort just seem too attention-seeking to me.
I don't know how you haven't figured this out yet but all women are attention whores one way or another.

>>17260774
Wow...I don't know what to say to this other than it looks like I got a taste of my own medicine. I still stick to my original views about disliking short shorts on women, but the way you explained everything...just wow. I never felt so shut down.

>>17260749
its a bit of both
much easier while sitting, as you only need a tiny bit longer than waist length for the ends to reach thighs

>>17260774
>there's nothing wrong with being revealing at all, that's a major perk of the current era in which people are allowed to present themselves more authentically
>It literally does no harm,
>women can finally be the whoresluts they were meant to be
yaaaas I totally agree go slaaaaay girl power bitch~

>>17260807
>women can finally be the whoresluts they were meant to be
Yes, that's true, and you could do it too but you won't actually attract anyone regardless so there wouldn't be much of a point.

>>17260717
This is honestly the gayest post I have ever seen
Also, the shorts on the first picture are too long

>>17260774
>seething horny zoomer faggot

>>17260824
>t. seething incel who has never had any power of a woman in any conceivable fashion with a desire to have an ounce of power over them through restraining societal expectations in an attempt to fill the void of female interaction

>>17260774
post tits whore

>>17260831
I'm a dude, but I could roleplay as a woman for you so that you can pretend to have your first female interaction in literal months if you want. I'm truly selfless, I'm willing to help an incel in need.

>>17260836
>>17260828
>>17260774

>>17260837
You truly are a master of come backs and retaliating with creative replies. Its shocking that you've never even held eye contact with a woman that you aren't blood related to, it must be the intimidation factor. I'm sure some day you'll actually get a woman to look in your general direction without her debating whether or not its even a good idea to give you the idea that you might not be immediately repulsive to the entirety of the female population.

>>17260841
>gif reply
>virgin seethes a paragraph

>>17260846
Good luck with everything man, I need to sleep.

>>17260848
>sleep losing-argument-escape tactic

>>17260850
You literally didn't refute a single point. Good night!

>>17260812
Bro how tf are they too long that's like a 2 inch inseam lmfao.

>>17260729
nobody cares moid
>>17260740
how about you seek a cute bike shorts wearing gf

>>17260922
No need to call me a moid...cute bike shorts wearing gf does sound quite nice though.

>>17260717
You need airflow down under when it gets really bloody hot.

>>17260937
Still not as short as those women's shorts though...they look like they have at least a 5-7 inch inseam to them. While the pictures I provided only have like a 2 inch inseam or less.

>>17260918
2 inches too much

>>17260937
imagine if he got his left and right mixed up

>>17260717
Because women revel in their own objectification and debasment

>>17260729
I struggle between screwing my eyes to some beautiful legs and idea about being moderate over the women attire which is right

>>17260937
> t. living in a village
I can assure you, if you get out completely naked you still will be sweating like meat on a fry

>>17260754
you stink of conservative

>>17260717
kys

>>17260735
kek

>>17261456
Based
>>17260717
Ever since the loosening of the skank embargo there's been no hope

>>17260766
Wrong. The "good" reason is i get to look at their long legs.

>>17260717
>While men's shorts went to the knee or sometimes even past the knee
stop being a coward and get actual shorts then?

>>17260841
no way you aren't a women. Only women type like this. Quit pretending to be a dude.

>>17263897
Oh God...a dick about to fly out of those tiny ass shorts...