/fa/ - Fashion

>rolex
based
>citizen
based
>seiko
based
>oris
based

>>17243553
>jlc
cringe

>>17243553

Can someone with an account on WUS post this pic there and ask them whether this is a digital or an analog display please? I'd love to see them have a go at it.

>Junghans makes a tribute to their original model in the same 34mm size
>it only comes in automatic, the original was hand winding
>it has a date function when the original was no date
Aragfhhhhhh
Fuck im so Fucking sick of date complications being added to every vintage reissue
Date complications are the worst complication

>>17243571
Actually i lied this one is pretty close, its in a totally different category on their website for some reason

>>17243571
They used to sell a sterling silver case one as well but i can't find it anymore.

>>17243572
lol

For me it's the Chesterton Perpetual desu

>>17243577
lame

I was near one of the stores and by chance, they actually had stock. They're actually pretty good looking IRL. Very light and definitely very plastic feeling but I'm not surprised for the price tag. I might change the band to something like a nato.

Anyone else got one? As a side note too, do not buy one from a scalper. Some retards are trying to resell them for almost $1000 (or $2000 in Japan) and they're definitely not worth more than retail.

>>17243581
New Chesterton Field Accurate with a hrat-sink caseback spotted!

Did anyone else end up spending way more than they wanted to when they first started collecting watches? I realized that in hindsight I overpaid, and it feelsbadman.

I’ll add some advice from a guy who blew his wad: buy omega gray, and Rolex white. I feel like answering questions so shoot. Or make fun of me for being foolish either way.

>>17243586
>hrat
*heat

sexo

>>17243590
The hour hand ruins it.

>>17243587
Definitely bought some watches I shouldn't have bought. I could sell them and get my money back but I hate selling stuff. I don't hate them but I don't really need them and I would be fine without them. They're G-Shocks so I'm not out a lot of money at least.

I would love to hear about the watches you bought that you regret but even anonymously I know it's not easy admitting it. Good luck friend.

>>17243577
>JUNGHANS desLgn

just did a shit lads

>no job
Casio
>job
Rolex
>rich and job
F.P. Journe

Strongly considering importing a PMD56, talk me out of it.

Cope if you must and you will

>>17243555
>t. le butthurt poorfag

>>17243617
cant afford a rolex?

>>17243548
ITS TIME

>>17243620
i will now watch your show

>>17243618

>>17243605
>rich and no job
Casio

>>17243600
I understand the issue of having a lot of cheaper, less liquid watches, since the effort to sell them feels like it’s not worth it while keeping them can feel like clutter.

Thanks fren. I bought a white dial skydweller gray from 2019 for 23,500 (retail is 15k, current liquid price if I sell is 19k, and new is less than I paid for the watch used) before I established a relationship with my current dealer. I bought a seadweller black for 10k and s and g Tudor trade. Sold the black SD for 12.5 and bought a two tone seadweller for 17k from an AD. I bought a Omega Seamasted Sedna as my first watch for 17k when you can buy it new from the gray market right at this moment for 12k.

My ass got blasted from a lack of patience and knowledge. I’m not in dire straits or anything but it is not a feeling I would want anyone else to have. Spending the money on watches if you have it is fine, but don’t get ripped off. Rolex is a waiting game, Omega is a research game. Omega charges well above market price, I would never recommend buying one from a store unless they offer you a rare watch for some unlikely reason.

>>17243605
>Rich and no job
Still glorious F.P. Journe
And Lange

>when she sees my high-end watch collection

Take your pick.

>>17243629
Sorry to hear that. I try to buy my watches bellow retail but sometimes I get inpatient and go with a a small discount instead. I had a feelbad moment when I saw a watch for much cheaper after I bought it. I did the reverse calculation and I decided I would happily have paid the difference to have owned and worn the watch all that time. I don't know if that math works out in your situation. For me it was a few hundreds, for you it's a few thousands. It all depends on how much you like the watch. If you like the watch I don't think you should torment yourself with how much you could have saved. If you don't like it then that is real pain. The watches you mentioned are nice but they are huge, I hope you are a fat bastard so they fit well.

I hope you can weather the storm until you recoup your loses. You should get a G-Shock and put your watches away for 10 years then sell them.

>>17243650
Lol’d hard at the fat bastard comment.

One day hopefully I can sell the sky for close to what I paid. The omega is a lot cause.

You only buy g-shocks?

>>17243658
And yes I have tormented myself, it was all irresponsible but it’s done right may as well just enjoy.

Rolex is cringe

>>17243605

>Rich and Steve Jobs
Apple Watch

>>17243666
You give your mom cringe.

>>17243670
>Steve Jobs
LOL faggot died of painful cancer cause he didn't *trust* medicine and instead preferred alternative treatment.
I very much prefer rich and not woke, to rich and fucked up and buried, like steve cuck jobs.
And with an F.P. Journe.

>>17243584
>paying scalper prices
>for a non-limited watch
>made by swatch of all people

>>17243666
devil digits confirm

>>17243618
you’ll never see a poor person with a JLC, but there are plenty of poor people with rolexes

>>17243678
it’s the poorfag version of overpaying for a royal oak or a nautilus.

>>17243685
The real wealth is liking the watch.

>>17243687
no one buys a JLC in spite of not liking the watch, plenty of people do that with rolexes.

ruined by date window every time..........

>>17243570
is there a watch where the majority of space is taken up by this kind of display?

>>17243658
>You only buy g-shocks?
Yes. I look at other watches but I can't get over my autism of wearing something fragile and expensive on my wrist. I'm in a traditional dress watch phase. I'll probably never buy one.

>>17243706
lamest rolex on earth second to the explorer and possibly the milgauss

>>17243707
all rolexes are lame

>>17243708
boohoo cracker

>>17243709
boohoo nigger

>>17243710
cope and seethe poorcel, cope and seethe

>>17243416
I mean when will it look like it looked when it was good. This was the best version. The new one with aluminium bezel and non-bent hand is completely pointless.

>>17243712
see >>17243685, rolex poorfag

>>17243714
you wear a swatch

is anyone else distracted Jenni Elle videos? The person handling the watch is usually not her, but probably her husband, that takes me out of it

>>17243732
creepy post

>>17243732

I don't care about the meat bag holding things or saying the words. Only the timepiece matters. Human flesh is fallible and fleeting, a good watch is forever, and the perfect state of being. God himself envies the ultimate vessel of the soul. I would turn myself into a watch if I could.

>>17243737
interesting thought! what kind of watch would you be?

I want one but I have a mental block that doesn't allow me to spend $1.5k on a casio that had a MSRP of under $500

>>17243723
i don’t wear fashion watches, which is why i dont wear rolex either.

>>17243741

Haven't really though about a particular model. But....something classical in appearance, mechanical, nothing too flashy, an honest watch. Dedicated more to its task, and less so of giving its wearer a flex.

Definitely not an Invicta King Python.

>>17243553
What a fruity dog

>>17243742
just mod a duro retard

Swatch

>>17243678
I'm not sure if people are actually doing it but they're seriously trying to get 1k for them on eBay, Chrono24 and shit like that.

>>17243713
the quality on that looks abysmal.

>>17243646
Who is she and does she have feet?

>>17243687
I'm quite wealthy then, i love my watch.

>>17243737
interesting *thought*
what kind of drugs do you abuse?

>>17243835
Based and swisspilled

>>17243936
Yes, and you don't deserve her name. Creep.

>>17243974
Never mind, i found her and i was disappointed.

It's hilarious how people still believe JLC is some sort of "connoisseurs choice".
It was kind of true when Patek, AP and VC used JLC movements. Back then you could get the best movements available without paying high horology money. But now that pretty much every luxury brand make their own movements and JLC stopped being a movements supplier, it's just one luxury brand among others that lost most of its uniqueness after being absorbed by Richemont.
I'm not saying they make bad watches (I actually love the Reverso) but I find most of their designs soulless and uninspired. They look too modern, huge and over-complicated. Just like these cars company that all make the same SUV designs.
Pic related is everything I hate about modern watches.

>>17243996
sorry someone called your submariner ugly

>>17243581
Kys your self fur fag

>>17243996
>too modern
>everything I hate about modern watches.
You sound like an unbearable cunt. Get help.

Are these any good? Been looking for a holy grail homage and these look pretty good.
14.8mm thigh though..?

>>17244011
LOL NO

>>17244011
There's a difference between a "homage" and just a flat out rip off.

>>17244011
I wouldn't even pay $100 for that lump of shit.

>>17244011
>holy grail homage
That's some next level apathetic enthusiasm there.

>>17243996
I like that model. Yes. It's 42, but the L2L is 48 and it's a hair over 12mm thick. Would easily pick it over a speedmaster, but I like bi compax chronos

ignoring any brand-jerking, what are your thoughts on the aesthetics here?

>>17244044
Honestly not a fan. It looks like something I'd find at a cheap market.

>>17244044
The crown and strap both look too small, and overall it just looks a bit plain for my taste.

>>17244044
Daniel Wellingron cope. KEK
Plus, that date is fucking pathetic.

>>17244044
Hands too small, date window placement is far too close to the center of the dial. Both are telltale signs of cheaping out and getting the cheapest possible, tiny movement. In other words, pic rel.

>>17244011
>holy grail homage
Why not just save up for the grail.

>>17244044
good lord what an ugly date window

>>17244044
Boring, too simple, date is too small... Cheap.

>>17244011
High quality fakes are cheaper than that abomination.

>>17243997
The fact you're assuming I'm a Rolexfag for criticizing the Polaris says it all about your perception of JLC (ie Rolex cope).

>>17244114
if you say so rolexsister

what's the best casio pro trek and why

thanks in advance, I plan to venture outdoors

>>17244115
>I plan to venture outdoors
why would you do that? sounds unhealthy.

>>17244124
hang out with my rolexsisters and want to dab on them by using my cool pro trek features

>>17244127
if they own a rolex you can't dab or impress them. also seeking their validation is retarded.

>>17244127
>dabs on your "pro trek" features

>>17244133
what is this poofter watch?

>>17243830
How are you going to make such inane suggestions and then calls others retards?

>>17244020
Yeah, flat off rip off says the name of the brand on the dial they're trying to rip off

I'm finna obssessed with this dark blue + red accents color scheme, but apparently they only make this in 46mm. Are there any similar pieces around 39-40?

>>17244187

>>17244190

>>17243996
>NOOOOO YOU CAN’T MAKE MODERN SPORTS WATCHES
>NOOOOO YOU CAN’T ADAPT TO THE MARKET AND THE TIMES
>MAKE 34MM DRESS WATCHES FOR PEOPLE LIKE ME (who can’t afford the brand and won’t buy them)
Powerful stuff. Did you also complain when the new 6119 was 39mm?

Oh, I get it now. "Sub" stands for "submissive"!

>>17244202
it actually means subpar

>>17244194
is it a problem if I want a steel sports watch with blue dial from different companies? I just like the combination, but I also like the individual designs

>>17244187
Your perfect watch, anon.

>>17244044
despite some flaws, that sunburst dial is pretty nice

>>17244224
Buy what you want.

>>17244187
It's way outside your size range, however.

Hamiltonians, show yourselves

>>17244262
mmh

>>17244202
>submissive mariner

>>17244262
all of those watches are based. all of them.

i enjoy watches more for the aesthetics than the engineering, and though i think the inner machinations of many timepieces fascinating and deserving of respect, i'm drawn more to movements which i find pretty

>>17244310
indeed, but how would you decide which one to wear if you owned several of them?

>>17244322
wait til you find out that there’s more to watch design that dial color, complication and case material.

what's a good leather strap design for a gold dress watch? mine is coming apart already. willing to try something new. pic related.

>>17244322
Why would I buy several of them

>>17244322
wait til you find out that there’s more to watch design than dial color, complication and case material.

I just lost an auction I really wanted.
I wanna kick a child in the groin.
FUUUUUUUCK

>>17244325
Good ones will have a folded edge, expensive ones have gator on both sides, but calf is fine. You'll have to decide the square size, large medium or small, and finish; glossy, semi, or matte. You also need to decide on bolstering, or if it's padded or not. A good gator strap could exceed the cost of that watch if you go for the premium options.

>>17244325
safe choice would be something like this ostrich with the slightly gold tone running through those striations

aside from that though, you can pair it with whatever you like; giving it multiple different looks for any occasion; black crocodile is always nice with gold
grey suede might be interesting, especially if there was a blue thread running through it to match the hands


apologies for the garbage screengrab btw, original was a webp and i'm too lazy to frame it correctly

>>17244326
as I said, I just like steel sports watches with a blue dial, so I'd probably by several from different companies, even if it sounds retarded.

>>17244327
yes, and I think I'd have a hard time choosing one over the other for a specific occasion

>>17244262
row 4 column 3

>>17244200
>>NOOOOO YOU CAN’T MAKE MODERN SPORTS WATCHES
Modern designs are ugly and soulless as fuck. Sports watches peaked in the 60s/70s, right before the quartz crisis. Doing a modern design for an outdated tech is cringe. This is why all the best watches are vintage inspired in their most basic versions : Submariner, Speedmaster, Royal Oak, Monaco, Santos, etc. These will never get old. Your gay ass JLC Polaris will look dated in 10 years (it already does).
>>NOOOOO YOU CAN’T ADAPT TO THE MARKET AND THE TIMES
Fuck off tranny, nobody likes modern designs. Everything is ugly nowadays: cars, buildings, fashion, movies, music. Watches are no exception. If you think pic related looks good, you're either a tranny, a s*yfaggot or a nigger.
>>MAKE 34MM DRESS WATCHES FOR PEOPLE LIKE ME (who can’t afford the brand and won’t buy them)
Cope. I only wear divers and field watches.

>>17244368
>Submariner, Speedmaster, Royal Oak, Monaco, Santos
all garbage
>I only wear divers and field watches.
to nobody's surprise, only trash watches.

crackers arguing shit they can't and shan't be affording
for shame for shame

>>17244368
I like classic styles also, it's why I'll never own a Casio.

I need to sell some of my watches for the money. It truly hurts trying to pick the ones I have to let go.

>>17244368
How will you move the goalposts when I tell you the Polaris debuted in 1968? It’s funny how blathering retards in this thread can’t even go two posts without humiliating themselves.

>>17244367
6-1

>>17244368
>I only wear divers and field watches.
Opinion discarded, you’re a poorfag with no taste.

>got a call
>it's not from the AD
>it's from HR

>>17244413
Lol. My ad won’t leave me alone

Thoughts on ZEROO?

>>17244418
definitely one of the uglier royal oak wannabes i’ve seen

>>17244418
Nice casioak bro is that the new Bluetooth model?

>>17244418
Are those barrels in series?

>>17244418
LOL What a shitter.

When will the markets pop for real?

>>17244338
I'm always happy when lose an auction. It feels like I saved money. Winning a bid makes me feel like I wasted my money.

>>17244451
>win
>feels like i made a shit purchase.
>lose
>feels like i missed a great deal.
whats wrong with me?

>>17244341
>>17244343
Thanks for the great tips anons. Didn’t know there were so many nuances to “leather strap”. This watch is only a few hundred dollars though so I’m probably not going to be splurging on leather straps that could possibly deteriorate in the future (unless that only happens to the stock Orient straps).

>>17244133
god... its so sexy

>>17244455
Being the highest bidder by definition means you overpaid. The only time I feel bad about losing an auction is when I totally miss the timing and it goes for a really low price. Feels good when I see something I'm not bidding on go for crazy high prices. I laugh at the bidders.

>>17244478
Nice joke, memanon.

>>17243693
I think Bell+Ross did something in radar style. Your next best bet is something like this.

>>17244500
Right, there we are.

Does anyone have the meme of all the major watch brands ranked according to the different Pepes?

>>17244502

>>17244519
>requires daily charging and batter dies in a year
bravo

>>17243548
Cassioak full black or with color highlights?

>>17244526
looks like maduro

>>17244533
80s Lázaro Cárdenas

>>17244529
Def with white indices or its very poorly legible

>>17244522
it tracks menstrual cycles, so its a perfect trade off.

>>17244133
A case inspired by a pot.

>>17244548

trump

>>17244187
Yes dark blue and strong red go well together. Much better than blue and orange, that is meh.

>>17243996
Are there no running seconds here?

>>17243996
>(I actually love the Reverso)
Cant afford 2 decent watches so you'll overpay for 1 ugly watch that gives you 2 ugly sides.
topkek

>>17244263
that's so fucking sick
sent from my gw5000

>>17244562
you don't own a luxury watch

You could get some truly interesting watches for the same price if a grey market submariner date

>>17244133
Its so over watch bros

>>17244343
do they make this for iwatch?

>>17244659
not that i saw, anon, but i'll link the seller page and you can check for yourself
https://etsy.me/3BbpG4w

posts from vietnam so some materials might be illegal in your country

>>17244564
I really like this however I really want to get a g-glide square for the moonphase and ride. I will probably change the bumper though to a transparent black jelly one.

should i sell my speedmaster for the new apple watch ultra?? it would be such a great upgrade

>>17244709
absolutely

>>17244401
Not him but that watch looks much better >>17244482
>Being the highest bidder by definition means you overpaid
You only overpay if you go above market value you fucking retard. If you buy a watch for $300 at auction that goes for $600 you didn't overpay. What is it with all the illogical retards posting on this board. Are we gonna have a repeat of yesterday's thread?

>>17244560
No running seconds is a mark of a true bicompax. It's also completely unnecessary on a chrono, you want seconds? Turn on the chrono.

>>1724404
>Average response from idiots who dislike the watch for Rotary club members

Nice and good looking if you change the leather straps.

Worth 2k$?

>>17243693
Casio A201, A202 (pictured) , AA84, AA85
They all use the module 103

>>17244756
This comment is for
>>17244044
Good watch from Rotary bros

>>17244716
A running secconds that allows for hacking is a mark of a timekeeping instrument, which a watch is, where "vague" shouldnt even be in a dictionary.
I have a 1950s soviet manual wind that in any other position than face-up loses 3min a day. I still adjust it every time I wind it up (once a day), but guess what, non-hacking seconds.
I hate inprecision and people being late, so I guess this is my little tism.

>>17244715
>Not him but that watch looks much better
A modern version of that watch exists. The guy is cherry picking to make it look like he had a point (he doesn’t and has not and will not respond to my post calling him out). He’s an idiot and you probably are as well for not understanding the conversation which only comprised of three brief posts.

>>17244791
Nice Longines, homie.

>>17244790
That watch does have a hack function

>>17244502
>HUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUE

can you remove the automatic winding module on mostly all movements and leave the watch only with handwinding or is that only possible on some specific movements, like IIRC on rolex?
can you remove the auto module on nh35 and have a significantly slimmer movement from one of the fattest regular movements?
is there a comparable modding/custom watch community to the nh35, or is seiko the only real viable option?

Where can I find some high quality fakes? I just want women to believe it's real

>>17244791
The Polaris Memovox is a damn nice watch and because it has an alarm complication that means it was worked on by JLC's best watchmakers so you know the movement is top tier.

>>17244801
My Moscow manufacture TTK1 from the 4th quarter of 1952 does NOT have a hacking function.

How do you feel about sightless watches?

>>17244868
Looks cool

hey watchbros,
what's your comfiest strap type/material? i'm looking for something casual for my khaki field king that's light and won't make my wrist sweat all day
bonus points if two piece, so it doesn't add extra thickness to the watch

Apple won

>>17244874
Won what exactly? They dominate the low end of the market but high end mechanical watches are selling better than ever before.

>>17244876
They won the Gay Loca award.

>>17244876
if only apple could make it necessary that you need to wear two apple watches on each wrist.

>>17244133
>49mm
lol
lmao even

>>17244790
>891 KB PNG
>>>17244716 (You) #
>A running secconds that allows for hacking is a mark of a timekeeping instrument, which a watch is, where "vague" shouldnt even be in a dictionary.
It's a fucking chronograph, if you want running hacking seconds just turn on your chrono at the exact minute and there you go, for 12h you have precise seconds, which in reality almost no one needs.

>>17244874

>>17244895
You can't know if the watch is actually running without turning on the chrono.

>>17244896
topkek

How do I stop caring about loom

>>17244896
A bit of refining and voilá.

>>17244872
NATOs are gay shit that adds enormous bulk with the stee strapl loops
MN type straps are fantastic because they are skin thin (may feel cheap) but are very finely adjustable and flex and only take a rinse and dry to clean off
perlon can be pompous and elegant or thin and cheap depending on the weave, supposedly well breathing and quick to dry, certainly compared to leather straps, even rally ones, which take a very specific watch design to work well with in the first place

I dont think the strap material itself matters as much as the actual fit, I have stout leather straps that feel right on the 2nd hole, but as my arm hangs and wrist swells, 3rd hole is the one to go to and the watch stays solid. Also highly depends on the season, winter metal straps are ass and your wrist wont swell up or sweat, thus keeping a more constant diameter.

Dont ever go for a nylon strap with holes, the cheapest of the cheap, no give, cutting into the skin, the rings tearing loose, just forget about it

>>17244925
Thanx anon.

>>17244920
The moment the indiglo patent runs out all manufacturers should jump in on it, but clearly practicality is not your main priority.

>>17244942
>Dont ever go for a nylon strap with holes, the cheapest of the cheap, no give, cutting into the skin, the rings tearing loose, just forget about it
damn, and i was about to go for sailcloth
i'll look into MN and perlon. thanks anon

>>17244943
Glad I could help.
Cheers, m8.

>>17244942
How would a pocket watch on a NATO strap look like?

>>17243548
Bought my first mechanical watch, Seiko snkl45j1. Very satisfied with it so far fits me nice out of the box and it's nice to have something fancier than the casio f91w. Thinking about buying an orient bambino next, should I?

>>17244962
Forgot to attach pic cause I'm retarded

>>17244962
Take it slowly, you are in no need to hurry. While you wait and explore the wonderful world of watches why don't you save some money so you can maybe buy a Cocktail time instead of a Bambino?

Are there any solar powered casios/digital watches that have vibrating alarms? Need something to wear to sleep without waking gf with a beeping alarm.

>>17244942
I keep wanting to like mns but they just don't work for me. They're elastic, so they'll always feel tight. If you get them looser, the buckle thing doesn't feel very secure. Single pass natos don't bother me too bad, and I wore a 2 piece nylon for much of this summer. Pretty comfy if you don't mind the limited color selection they make.

>>17244968
Feels bad being a poorfag but I guess I'll have a sense of accomplishment when I grind enough money for something really neat

>>17244976
That's still a pretty good watch, don't worry about expensive stuff If it's out of reach

>>17244969
I fear vibrating would consume too much of the battery's juice daily to recharge sunnily.
If you want vibration, you might need to look into mechanical watches.

>>17244976
You don't have to feel bad if you're a poorfag, i am as well. There are many many watches to be had for under 500$, you just have to look around and do some research.

Reminder: this is how you all look

>>17245003
now THIS is the real chart making everyone ITT cope

>>17245003
Quick send a watch wearing guide

>>17245003

Me in dead center wtf

>>17245003
Not me, I'm not a poorfag.

>>17244984
yeah the only mechanical I see is the JLC Memovox which is way outside my price range. The GD350 looks like the best option based on my research

Got a new nato strap for my weekender and tried on some Rolexes.

>>17245009
You're still alive? How about your hand?

>>17245044
Other good mechanicals available are:
Vulcain (brand)
Seiko Bellmatic
Poljot

>>17244704
I hope you get it and keep the bezel. The colors look so cool. I would change the band myself.

>>17245058
Those alarms don't vibrate though, the goal is to be silent.

>>17245070
>OK Ciao
>Chuffed to bits

>>17244969
>>17245044
The GBD-H1000 has solar and vibration but it also has countless other features you probably wont need. It's also big and $400. I say go for the GD-350 but get the positive display. Hurry up it's all but discontinued.

>>17245098
I want one with a negative display like that, but without Bluetooth or any smartphone bullshit, and with various cool sniper killer soldier spy operator functions. I want a hourly alarm, multiple regular alarms, and all sensors. What do I want and does it exist?

Does a cheap ($250 and less) blue solar watch exist that's not a diver?

>>17245115
As far as negative displays go the GD-350 is not the worst.

>>17244962
The bambino is great, it was my first watch and I love it. Like the other anon said, getting a cocktail time is also a good option, the sunburst dial on pic related looks amazing in person and it will probably be my next purchase.

>>17245126
Does it have to be blue?

>>17245132
>sunburst
It's actually called a sunray dial. Sunburst is very fine and is done using a different method.

>>17245126
>>17245138
There is a blue one.

>>17245138
Yeah, I'm currently looking at some eco-drives but they're all so big. If you see one that's less than 45 l2l, let me know.

>>17245143
Have you ever gotten a watch because the dial color perfectly matches a piece of clothing you have or vice versa?

>>17245143
Sorry my post here >>17245145
Was just meant for the thread, not just you

Anyone have thoughts on the Citizen Eco-Drive caliber 2100?

>>17244767
>tooter

>>17245129
https://www.casio.com/us/watches/gshock/product.GD-350-1B/

I have to say this looks pretty good. No atomic time though? Damn.

>>17245142
Do you have model # for blue one? Also these look pretty good, but damn, titanium is gonna scratch like hell.

>>17243626
Based cryptoking

>>17245150
Looks like it got cancer

>>17245158
I've heard speculation that whatever motor they put in for vibration hinders radio reception to the point you basically never see both together

>>17245180
Lol seriously?

>>17244418
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdU0bKum930
ZEROO? MORE LIKE KINOO!

>>17245186
Yes. Greg Anderson talked about it. It's probably not physically impossible or anything to do both but it may be hard enough Casio just says "fuck it" and keeps the two apart.

>>17245003

these mechanical ussr watch go for 90$ on ebay, are they worth the price?

>>17245215
your watch is quite literally ass
youve posted this 10 times

>>17245164
LCW-M510D-2AJF
It's not titanium, it's steel.

>>17245220
>youve posted this 10 times
its literally the fist time i ask

>>17245215
do poorfags actually

>>17243561
who

>>17244962
>>17244967
>retarded
typical seiko buyer
buy a rolex instead

>>17245244
Some Russian whore. In the video she is being asked if she would fuck rappers, here her reaction is like that because she said yes and the more details he went into about the arrest record of the rapper the more excited she got.

>>17245256
she has a bright future ahead of her as a single mother.

>>17245221
Ah thanks, was looking it up and got it mixed with the lcw-m100tse, which I wish came in blue.

>>17244153
The end of Rolex.

Rolex =cringe

>>17245287
see>>17243555

>>17244416
You haven't fully paid that cheap Tag Huehue you financed to 12 months. Why would they leave you alone?

which do i get

>>17245287
>>17243555
Both of you:
>CRINGE

>>17245299
always rolex

>>17245299

>>17245299
ew, nosex

>>17245299
Based JLC

looking for a watch with
>automatic
>5 bars
>1 week power reserve (only wear it on weekends)
><41mm
>budget 10k
anything good?

>>17245314

who needs 1 week power reserve if you have a watch winder

>>17245314
>5 bars
that will barely survive washing your hands.

>>17245325
but i soak my 5 bar watches into diluted soap water to wash them....

>>17245332
Soaking ≠ Faucet pressure

>>17245342
Mother fuckers out here thinking their sink simulates 50m water pressure.

>>17243590
A good looking IWC?

>>17243590
Shit numerals font. That's the one from the late 90s/early 00s right?

>>17245345
It's only ~70psi, many faucets put out 70-80psi. It could happen to you anywhere, at a truck stop, at a night club, etc...

>>17245366
Pressure from a stream =/= hydrostatic pressure. You would need a much stronger stream to break the seal, plus you would need to have your watch right up against the fucking spout.

>>17244868
Are they practical? cool as shit.

> Budget 1300USD
> Watch type: smartwatch
> Desired features: sleep tracking, calories burnt, GPS, heart rate i.e. maxed out wellness features
> Preferred strap option: steel
> Wrist size: 15cm circumference

idk anything about the smartwatch market so i got looking at the Garmin Fenix 7 Sapphire Solar

>>17244872
milanese
checks all your boxes and then some

>>17245283
This one?

Since we're posting lineages

>>17245417
This one specifically, but there's no blue version.
https://www.sakurawatches.com/casio-lineage-lcw-m100tse-1ajf
While looking around though, I found this citizen watch. The citizen logo and the dial is bland as fuck imo and makes it look way more dressy instead of casual which I'm going for, but it seems like my best bet.
https://www.sakurawatches.com/citizen-attesa-cb1120-50l

>>17245423

>>17245426
Mogged.

>>17245431
I would, but I'm a wristlet (6 inch) and way too out of my price range.

>>17245432
>not taking advantage of the weak yen

>>17245431
Honestly the moment I saw the Lineages, I thought "why not just buy something good like the Oceanus?".

>>17245433
I swear all the shops inflate their price to match USD anyway.

>drop my submariner into the pool
>water damaged
its over... my 10k...

>>17245454
haha now it's a SUBMARINEr XD

>>17245464

>>17245454
Unless your dumbass forgot to screw the crown, that's falseflagging and gay.

Looking to buy a watch on Ebay, but the seller is in Japan. Does anyone know if there's import/custom fees to USA, or is that for other countries?

>>17245454

>>17245472
trump

>>17245431
>tough mvt.

>>17245470
it slipped when i was setting the time bro..

>>17245479
>Yes, I set the time of my watches while standing over large bodies of water.
Fake and gay

>>17245483
Weird stuff can happen. I unironically got cum on my Rolex but I wasn't retarded enough to change the time while it was still on it.

>>17245483
I do this all the time though?

Thoughts?

>>17245518
Something about it feels wrong. It's like it's clashing with itself.

>>17245518
really fugly

watch id?

>>17245528

>>17245518
there's like 5 different fonts going on inside that dial. why is it so messy.

>>17245521
this, it's a mess

>blancpain
>White Bread
Lmao really?

yes and

Why don’t you just have a brand called Milquetoast?

>>17244704
model number?

>>17245586
rolex already exists

>>17243713
This one has too much gilt for my taste.
But I agree, the new skyquest looks like a $500 kickstarter watch.
The contrast between the limited runs selling out in hours/minutes and the V2 not selling at all is half-hilarious, half-sad.

>>17243742
There you go.

new
>>17245615
>>17245615
>>17245615
>>17245615
>>17245615

>>17245518
The dial is too fancy for a diver.

>>17245528
Hard to say, looks like a SkyDweller perhaps?

>>17244783
god, it looks so cool
but the prices are so stupid
for a fucking casio

>>17245070
FUCK ME DEEEEEEEEEAAD
guys. i gotta be totally honest with you.
i gotta be honest here, i gotta be totally honest guys this is a FUCKIN SHITTEEER

he stopped making good content years ago :( now its just him nonsexually harassing a little asian slut selling handbags or toy horses