/fa/ - Fashion

>First for the BEST Chart™.
Cope if you must and you will.

watch id?

>>17232140
Is that your boyfriend?

plen here, I am considering buying this watch. The bezel has some scuffing at the 12, 3 and 4 o’clock positions, can this be polished out at a jeweler?

>>17232140
That's a GA-100B-4A my homosexual friend.

>>17232198

>>17232198
no

>>17232198
>>17232200
I feel like you're really fishing in the bottom of the barrel. What's your budget? You can find pic related for a bit above fifteen hundred in Chrono24 and it's not beaten to shit.

>>17232208
about $3k. My next choice within this range is a Zenith El Primero Chronomaster, would love a JLC Master Control but decent ones don’t go for less than $5k

>>17232212
For 3k you can get that Omega in pristine condition. Or are you planning to buy others too? I would prefer a Speedmaster to a Chronomaster, btw.

>>17232218
I am looking at one singular watch for now, and I agree the Speedmaster is my way forward. As much as I’d love an open/exhibition case, I’m much better off with a day/date and the 3523.80 has a triple date and chronograph. Plus I have babby wrists, the 39mm case would be a good size.

And you are correct, there are other much cleaner options on Chrono24 like this one, albeit from Japan and with unknown movement performance. That beater I posted above has documented proof of +2s/daily time loss and is in the US, so if the scuffs can be polished relatively easily that is my current best option.

Rolex rhymes with SOULESS

>>17232247
Well, no. That kind of bezel can't be easily polished without risking erasing some of the depth of the numbers. Btw, japanese sellers are possibly the most reliable in the entire site. Just look for one with a good, long reputation and background. It's easier to adjust a watch than to polish it, too.

>>17232260
this is good advice. Thanks anon!

>>17232265
You're welcome, my friend.

kek it changed to available soon
they really did only have 1 huh

>>17232352
inb4 you get a message that they didnt have jack shit
also, you wont get a haircut from the spunky high school girl just because you get a military themed watch. with a shit bracelet. just look at those middle links ffs.

>>17232352
Man that's sexy

whats a cool watch I could get for Rolex money?

>>17232542
There's many brands to choose from.

>>17232542
Rolex.

>>17232542
Vacheron Constantin Historiques American 1921

What kind of watch would he wear?

>>17232592
casio

Anyone know how long the wait list is for an Explorer?

Are digital watches still in style? If so can you point me in the right direction pls

>>17232635
haha yes

>>17232592
None because he's anti-consumerist

>>17232617
which one?

Just financed a Rolex.

>>17232640
A G-shock smartwatch to track his fitness goals :)))

>>17232635
>still in style
Wear and buy what you like, not what the crowd says is okay you little drone.
G-shock 5600 blackout
Casio f-91 and variants

>>17232667
i highly doubt that

>>17232125
>two tone chocolate
most underrated variant.

Just found out that Jaquet Droz will no longer sell their "affordable" stuff like the Grand seconde (probably because they weren't selling that much), and will do only premium stuff on demand

I know gshocks are waterproof, but if you dropped it in ocean water, is that bad considering the salt water?

>>17232592
Casio F-91W for work.
Stolen or knock off for play. Doesn’t matter what.

>>17232750
All that wasted space is dumb.

>WASTED space

>>17232750
A small seconds/pointer date, gives off Lange vibes. Cool.
Someone should do a tourbillon small seconds and incorporate another pointer date tourbillon within it.

>>17232825
A constant force pointer date.

Has anyone ever used a CVT in a watch?

Spring Drive is the most important discovery in watches period.

Is there a watch that can speed up or slow down the displayed time on demand with a slider?

>>17232833
What is CVT?

Question: what (if anything) comes to mind seeing this watch? I love the look but I'm worried it looks like yee olde military larping piece...

>>17232836
More like Gay Drive

>>17232844
just looks like a generic watch to me

Reminder, Rolex sells their watches to you at a loss and is still Luxury. Refer to the chart.

>>17232843

>>17232844
It's orange, so it's meh.

>>17232844
Kinda like it. Probably huge tho

>>17232844
The crown looks stupid
Other than that its okay I guess, I can't imagine people giving you shit for it

>>17232872
It is pretty big but I enjoy large watches. >>17232873
The crown is probably the weakest part of the design, ya.

>>17232833
Tag Heuer did something like this called the V4

>>17232645
>financed
oh no no

>>17232904
The weights moved the belts to power the watch there. I'm thinking of a CVT fusée-and-chain to deliver constant torque.

>>17232906
Ur jelly.

Fusée

>>17232921
et

>>17232923
chaîne

>>17232921
>>17232923
won't a balance wheel this large be affected by gyroscopic effect of hand movement and be less accurate?

>>17232941
I think that's the tourbillon cage.

>>17232921
>>17232941
Blue=tourbillon cage
Grey=balance wheel

>>17232844
Looks like an old Panerai Mare Nostrum. Just not as good. They probably stole the design, tho.

Long

>>17232951
A. Long & Sons

>>17232950
It's obviously a type 20

>>17232951
How tacky
Tourbillions shouldn't be visible on the dial

>>17232670
Thank you anon

>>17232970

>buy babby sized SKX knockoff from Ali for 50 bucks
>Has no chapter ring so it can't be misaligned
Kek
Also apparently the water resistance on the dial is just an outright lie but who cares. Hope the thing doesn't die when I wash my hands with it.

>>17232964
>Tourbillions shouldn't be visible on the dial
Nonsense.

>>17232957
You blind? Besides the dial's numbers, all the designing elements come from the Mare Nosotrum: bezel, case, pushers, subdials arregement, size. That watch has nothing to do with Breguet's more elegant design.

>>17232964
>Tourbillions shouldn't be visible on the dial

>>17232986
It's what trashy nouveau riche do

>>17232994
Jesus there were dozens of type 20 variants

>>17232997
t. poorfag who knows no "nouveau riche" but learnt the phrase and owns a seiko
Kek

>>17232951
i wonder how much that one costs
>>17232996
>>17232964
>>17232986
it really deepens, some people enjoy the engineering and like watching how things works
alo i think an open heart is not suited as a dress watch

>rolex ad said expect a call in a week
>put my self on the list today
epic

>>17233008

>>17233011
>he got the verbal confirmation
>he referred the the chart
b-b-b-based?

>>17233011
Aside from the usual suspects, waiting lists have been going down for a while and inventory has actually started showing up in ADs.

Last week I was dropping my JLC off for its 10-year service and just had a look around. I expected to see the Rolex case barren as usual but there were pieces in there, mostly DJs (but then half of all Rolexes sold are DJs). They had some sports pieces too. I got to try on an Explorer II and the new 2-tone Explorer I. These were not display pieces. They offered to sell me one or both.

(I didn't buy either. The Explorer II is fuckhuge and the 2-tone Explorer looks way tackier in real life than in pictures.)

>>17232520
They sent me the tracking number kek.
I also called hamilton and it took the guy 20 minutes to locate the SKU, that's how hard it's been memory holed.
He was genuinely surprised I was able to order it and he confirmed it was the last one they had.
He also said he'll try to get one more from another warehouse and contact me if he can find it. Nice guy.
>Sir, you want to buy a second one?
Yes, for my uh..twin brother.

>>17232836
I love that case but hate everything else.
Why can't they just put a 9F and a nice lacquered black dial in that case?
Fuck all the spring drive and gay dial shit. I'm not sending my watch to the ki- I mean japs to get serviced for $800 every 3 years.

>>17232844
>24 hour subdial

>>17232997
That says tourbillion on the dial tho, totally crass

>>17233221
Oh its you
What do you do if you can't find a second watch? Do you just not buy?

>>17233174
> They had some sports pieces too.
A lot of Rolex AD's have been stocked with display pieces for quite a while now. Doesn't mean you can buy them though since the don't contain movements. It was done by Rolex to stop all the empty cases customers were seeing when they went into a store which was not good for business. Just means you can put in an order.

Wait times have definitely improved though, everything is back to pre-Covid levels and possibly even better.

>>17233248
This is how you do it elegantly.

>>17233269
LF would know since he originally worked for Patek.

>>17233230
3 years is kind of exaggerating it, by a lot. 30th anniversary of the 9f is next year, so maybe theyll do a suite of le's that will sell out instantly that you cant have

I just got a m5610.

The perfect watch. It syncs time and is basically indestructable. I never have to think about it.

I wish i can have everything this way. Only thing i can think of is crocs that are similar.

>>17233305
trump

>>17233330
what about him?

>>17233345
As tasteless as your watch.

>>17233352
i'm not one for aesthetics. i just want a tool that will be quicker to use than pulling out my phone.

>>17233345
idk trump

>>17233330
>>17233352

>a 74 year old man lives rent free in his head

get help.

Why haven't you written anything on this watch, you fucking faggots?
For little and I do not know of its existence.
This is now my next watch.

>>17233377
I like the sector dial more, but that's cool too.

>>17233377
Chopped '6'.
It's shit.
Save your money.

>>17232844
I think it looks nice but the strap is hideous. Like the other anon said it looks big.

>>17233377
Faux patina? Nope.
A 34-36mm design stretched out to 39mm? Ew.
12mm thick and still only has 30m of WR? How?!
Sub-second dial way too far inboard because the movement is too small for the case.
All that for 2200USD?

I don't know anon. It's too bloated to be a dress watch and too fragile to be a sports watch.

>>17233396
>faux patina
Fucking where?
I actually prefer it at 38.5mm and 12mm thick, since I'm not a wristlet.
I'm not going to swim with it.
They are like $1,500 usd in Chrono24, new.

>>17233402
You see how the numerals are cream colored but the hands are green? That's a fairly common combination with vintage watches. GO did it with their "vintage" diver as well.

>>17233377
Is that some kind of prototype? On the Long-jeans website, the lume on the dial and hands match.

>>17233406
Doesn't looks like that in real pics.

>>17233413
Oh, well, in that case, that's fucking straight up fauxtina.

>>17233418
Have your eyes checked, anon.

>>17233377
it looks completely cooked

>>17233427
Do you know even what fauxtina is? It's that beige-brown colored lume that's meant to imitate the appearance of actually patinated tritium lume. i.e. Faux patina: fauxtina.

>>17233377
The proportions are totally fucked. 38.5mm with 50mm lug to lug. Hard pass.

>>17233252
Depends on the watch

>>17233439
>50mm lug to lug
You're joking, I have a 41mm diameter watch with a ~47mm L2L.

>>17233377
Utterly mogged

>>17233446
Super long lugs like Nomos.

>>17233439
holy shit its awful. i could tell by how much space there is between the strap and case, its nomos-esque. this one looks pretty cool also, but 13.6

>>17233454
fuck me

>>17233453
A Tangente 38 only has a 47.7 lug to lug. Longines forgot how to design watches decades ago

>>17233455
That one is nice but the movement is a dogshit modular chrono.
Imagine that with a VHP HAQ quartz chronograph movement with sweeping hands though...

>>17233439
Hideous. Meme material.

>>17233377
When will this tiresome trend of rereleasing a vintage watch but worse end? Who are the retards buying this dogshit?

>>17233474
>When will this tiresome trend of rereleasing a vintage watch but worse end?
It's just starting. They have to because old designs are just better and everyone is tired of modern shit. I'm all for it. Once they get it right I might buy.

>>17233474
It's great when done right

>>17233479
It has been going on since 2008

>>17233487
>those tiny hands
The fuck was JLC thinking?

>>17233490
that didnt last long

>>17233490
Presumably to make sure the hour hand will never cover the alarm indicator. Looks like shit though. The 2000s were a rough decade for the JLC design team.

>>17233500
The 2000s saw the ugliest swiss designs in general.
It was a kino time for Japan though.

Watchbros...how do I even reply to this?

>>17233548

You don't have to explain shit. You tell that bitch that you like watches, simple as. If she doesn't like it she can go pound sand.

I'm considering getting a green dial (or blue) Rado Captain Cook.

Would I be better off putting down some more and getting an Omega or Tudor? I feel I'll still want more with the rado

>>17233548
Ask her what's her hobby then it shouldn't be too hard to make it look stupid. If she even does have a hobby since most women don't. There isn't a hobby you can't make fun of since hobbies are pretty dumb, that's why their fun.

>>17233548
Anything you can collect can be a hobby.

>>17233548
This is precisely why I don’t call my interests in watch a hobby, and I don’t call myself a watch collector even though I have spent a stupid amount of money on them. It just looks retarded to normal people (and it is retarded)

>>17232542

Parmigiani (2x)
JLC
Blancpain (1.5x)
Chopard (1.5x)
Omega (0.75x)

>>17233571
>It just looks retarded to normal people (and it is retarded)
Why do you do it then?

>>17233450
Literally who brand

thoughts on christopher ward? thinking of buying a secondhand one for $700.

>>17233500
>The 2000s were a rough decade for the JLC design team.

>when she sees my high-end watch collection

>>17233579

>>17233583

>>17233589
I can do this all day

>>17233592
One more for good luck

>>17233577
>he doesn't know

>>17233596
>when you need to take a pulse 1000m under water
What the fuck

>>17233576
I don’t want a boat

brehs i just want a submariner for my dives...i'm ok with being a normalfag

>>17233581
wow she's super hot who is this semendemen

Found my casio holy grail. 1k for a clean example

>>17233500
>>17233583
>>17233589
>>17233592
>>17233596
>I don't like it when people have personal tastes.
>We all should have the same boring watch.
Noted

>>17233606
No one dives with a watch anymore

>he doesn't wear a literal gold ingot watch
???

>>17233641
Most Lange and Patek are pricier and have more gold than that Corum.

Omega Seamaster Professional
Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra
Omega Speedmaster
Rolex Submariner
Rolex Explorer
Rolex Daydate
Brietling Navitimer
Cartier Tank
JLC Reverso
IWC Portugieser
Glycine Airman
Seiko 5 Sports
Seiko Pogue
Seiko Willard

These are the only acceptable watches you should be wearing.

>>17233646
Wrong.

>>17233648
Acceptable

>>17233646

I wouldn't wear any of those mediocre pieces lol

Feels like the advertisers got to you

Cachalot? More like catches a lot of compliments

>>17233646
Kinograph mogs every single one of those shitters.

>>17233646
>No Lange, Patek, Journe, Vacheron, Audemars, Breguet, IWC, Cartier...
Oh, you brainlet...

>>17233648
LOL
LMAO, even

>>17233652
keksalot at this

>>17233652
redpill me on this. this looks thick as fuck desu

>>17233661
>No Lange, Patek, Journe, Vacheron, Audemars, Breguet,
people wearing these are either rappers, apehoopers, or rich twats. Wearing these vanity pieces is a sign of shame
>IWC, Cartier...
They’re on the list. They only make 1 or 2 good watches

>>17233646

While I disagree, I am unironically wearing a glycine airman right now

>>17233661
>iwc
>literally machine made dogshit with outsourced movement
fucking lmaoing back at you jesus christ awful takes all around

>>17233662
>redpill me on this
It's Casio's stupd sub brand. Thick and shitty.

>>17233665
>Wearing these vanity pieces is a sign of shame

>>17233662
its thick as fuck worn by those who are thick as fuck

>>17233646
This is a person who does not like watches

>>17233671
no u

>>17233678
> Rolex Submariner
> Rolex Explorer
> Rolex Daydate
these aren't bad choices, even Patek collectors will often have at least one of those three.

>>17233668
>It's Casio's stupd sub brand. Thick and shitty.

>>17233681
You missed the point. If you limit yourself like that you don't like watches. This hobby is supposed to be fun and all the super serious cunts ruin it. Buy a fucking casio, buy some vintage no name brand, buy some shitter that tickles your fancy. Stop fucking worrying about how much you can resell a watch for and just buy something you're gonna keep and that's fun to you. There's nothing wrong with liking any of the watches on that list, what's wrong is liking only the watches on that list.

>>17233671
You will never afford a $100,000 watch, so why do you defend them so hard like a cuck?

“Every American thinks he’s just a temporarily embarrassed millionaire.”

>>17233686
Then that's what you should have said in the first place. You never actually made a point and this >>17233678 is more readily interpreted as "this is a shit list"

>>17233690
Well it can be interpreted in many ways and I see how you can interpret it the way that you did.

refer to the chart

>>17233686
All true.
Except Gay S O Y K O.
Fuck them

>>17233714
Cope and seethe french fag. Spring Drive yourself into some bitches.

>>17233639
i do. for recreational dives you only need one dive computer per group these days. being able to check how long i've been down is enough for me.

>>17233716
I'm not the frenchtard. I think all brands have some good watches.
But numale Gay S O Y K O is shite.

>>17233720
Oui oui cope and seethe

Getting my Oyster Perpetual tomorrow. The green one.

I only like obscure vintage casio divers

>>17232125
Hey guys I'm new suggest a watch for me
Type: pilot, something casual and everyday
Movement: Honestly they all seem the same to me I just want the aesthetics
Desired Features: equipped with a pussy magnet
Preferred Strap: Leather
Wrist Size: 6'' 1/4

I like the design of the Tisell Baushaus watch design but reading that the lug the lug was pretty long I don't think it would fit nicely on my wrist

>>17233742
Oops forgot to include price 400

>>17233733

Sounds boring af

Casio is the true choice of the gentleman. Unless you're absolutely filthy rich you have no need for any watch that is over 100$. Even then it's preposterous.

Cope and seethe. I know you will.

>>17233765
t. POORFAG

I really like the w800h from casio but I always found it kind of ugly, they've made it with a negative display so I'll finally want to wear this beater on days other than when I need a watch I don't mind destroying

>>17233767
How's that Rolex doing? Got any chicks lately? Do any yard work or workout with it or do you strap on a Chadsio when doing anything other than insecurely showing off?

>>17233775
>doing physical labor
Sorry, I'm not a peasant. Keep living your mundane life.

sup niggers, check out my watch

>>17233782
>being a useless blob.
Gardening isn't manual labor, it's a hobbie. Your brain is mush.

Are Seiko watches with the J serial number actually made in Japan or is it one of those tricks where it's actually made in China but a Jap overseer gives their ok and they slap that label on?

>>17233801
That's just the Rolex owner's seethe and cope™ that comes with the watch

>>17233833
Everyone knows you are what your Rolex is, if you buy a Submariner you MUST take up diving and if you get an Explorer you MUST only go on hiking holidays

>>17233801
Can’t stand “srs bizniss” anons who think anything worth doing needs to net you more money or potential money by making “connections”, it makes it so painfully obvious that their entire worldview has been forged on manosphere YouTube with all the videos about getting rich by larping as Gordon Gecko or some other fictional alpha male.

It’s pitiful because while they watch, they’re just being made prime corporate employees/marks
>Only think about the next deal
>TV and Hobbies are a waste of time, just buy books about finance and economics
>Take responsibility for any problems in your life and career, even if you didn’t create them
>Invest, invest, invest. Never spend money on stuff you’d enjoy, just hand it over to businesses
>Don’t ask for a raise, ask for more work to learn more about the business/industry, knowledge is worth more than money
And much, much more pseudo-alpha cringe

>>17233870
No, it's supposed to mean

>I worked hard to get this, now I have it

It's not supposed to mean

>I just went into major debt to buy this so I can be a pseudorichfag on 4chan pretending that any sort of manual labor is below me

>>17233925
>>17233876
>>17233801
>poors rants
What else is new?

Anyone thought about wearing 2 watches?

>>17233946
>implying

>>17233973
There has been some general in the US Military who wore a Rolex on one wrist and I believe a Seiko on the other wrist or something like that. Can't remember his name. He said it was for "tracking two timezones". Kinda stupid if you ask me, my 30$ Casio Royale can track 22 timezones more than his two watch setup.

Does anyone else watch talking timepieces with tony? He’s like some old boomer who used to be in a band and his dad was a famous movie helicopter pilot

>>17233973
I’ve only seen people wearing a regular watch and an Apple Watch at the same time on different arms

>>17233973
>>17234082
ENTER
CHADSTRO

Thoughts?

>>17234082
stormin norman

>took 4 hours to resize my bracelet
yep im taking it to the store next time

>>17233876
The vast majority of people in these threads have no money. That’s fine, 4chan skews young. But I would never take financial or life advice from people on this website and especially not from people in this thread. There are MAYBE 4 posters here with higher end collections; not that a higher end collection makes them an authority, but at the very least I’d trust their opinion on certain watches/brands over some NEET who has never touched a higher end watch.

The “sigma grindset” is complete cringe. Real wealthy people (i.e. multigenerational) don’t take that approach at all and probably live much more satisfying and fulfilling lives.

>>17234153
It’s a pretty simple fact that you’re most productive when you are getting enough sleep, free time and decompressing appropriately.
The whole sigma grindset is just what you get when you have an entire generation raised on video games. You are the lone wolf, only you can change the outcome, you can exploit the system for gain if you follow these steps.
YouTube personality’s seem to always push entrepreneurship because they can sell you business plans and tools.
Personally I think the best path for most young men who want to climb the ladder is either engineering or sales, find a startup if you want extra risk.

>>17232843
Cock and vall torture

Why did no one tell me the swatch group stock ticker is SWGAY

>>17233635
Even if you shill for JLC those are ugly designs.

>>17234229
I don't believe you.

>>17233765
I wear a Casio... that's over $1000.

>>17234196
>>17234153
It's sad and pathetic that all there really is to this entrepreneurship hype-train that is finally running out of steam, is the spitefulness and contempt for others that manifests as a kamikaze attempt to prove your worth over all others with the grindset.

It's like they want to be Patrick Bateman which is cringe enough already, but for it to go in reverse. They're trying to start off by acting like an egotistical psychopath in order to become rich, rather than becoming that way due to the dehumanising bubble money can put you in, if you let the money remain an obsession even when you already have it.

>>17234284
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/swgay/

Why should i buy a Rolex instead of a JLC or VC?

>>17234334
Because Rolex is better. JLC is Omega tier.

>>17234334
You buy a JLC or a VC if you need a serious watch
You buy a Rolex when your fifteen years old's birthday is coming close and you want to get him a cheap but sturdy shitter

>>17234334
Because only Rolex has Oystersteel™, Cerachrom™, Parachrom™ and Chromalight™

>>17234334
The durability and warranty

>>17234334
>Why should i buy a Rolex instead of a JLC or VC?
You're obsessed with the dregs of society recognizing that your watch is moderately expensive

What watch is this? I don't recognize that crown looking logo
Any ideas? He stopped wearing the IWC and Blancpain recently

> Series 8 Apple Watch
Applebros, we did it.

>>17234435
>nice watch
>shit car
Literally me

Apple Watch ultra announced. Is it over Rolex bros?

>>17234465
>40m water resistance
Pfft, no.

>>17234465
Lol

>>17234420
christopher ward lol

>>17233973
>two
Up your game, son.

>>17234495
Nope. CW's logo is a trident, not a crown

>>17234465
>Another shitter from silicon gayvalley
Not even fashion brands feel threatened.

>average Casio enjoyer

>>17234420
bagelsport

>>17232592
a bunch of weird random shitters, maybe an f91w for operations

What's the verdict? Is Rolex officially done for? Sneed it or Chuck it?

>>17234596
It’s officially over. This is the Rolex explorer killer. Grey market dealers going bankrupt from this will trigger the next recession. Apple has to be stopped.

>>17234596
Unironically impressive but no they are not done.

>>17234435
These are the people larping as richfags, driving budget tier cars.

>>17234596
Holy fucking shit. Is that a 4 inch wrist?

>>17234604
Ban assault Apple watches.

>>17234624
Not sure but the Apple Watch Ultra is 49mm.

>>17234624
Lets see you wear a 49mm watch anon

>>17234596
Still mogged by Garmin.

>>17234596
Might cop it, I currently have a Series 5 Apple Watch I use for working out and as my travel watch.

>>17234646
Here you go

>>17234596
It looks like shit.

Just put myself on a waitlist for a Rolex.
>3 months
Bruh.

>>17234694
Be glad they didn’t tell you 3 years

>>17234697
It's just for the green oyster perpetujal.

>>17234685
It has a shape of an old pot.

Time to make poorfags jealous
>inb4 fake
Get a job

>>17234709
>over a million dollars in watches
>$50 watch box
Yeah, it's all fake.

>>17234709
Lol what the fuck even is this

>order watch from macy's for half off
>it never shipped
>its gone from their storepage
never again will I purchase watches online

>>17234683
What is that? A 5 inch wrist?

>>17234745
7 1/4 , cry more :)

I fell for the A168 meme. Looks tiny on my wrist and the bracelet is really bad. Any suggestions on what to switch it with? Trying to salvage it.

>you will never find a better watch

>>17234788

>>17234504
For a second there I was afraid Nicolas Hayek wasn't going to get mentioned. The man wears not two, not three, but four watches PER WRIST.

>>17234788
Lol, lmao

>>17234798
Agreed.
One could only hope to be as brave and bold as he was.

>>17234773
put a nato strap on it

>>17234798
I thought maybe he has all the watches to see international times, but the two visible watches are set to the exact same time. Truly bold.

God damn that was fast

>Reminder modern vikings wear vintage Omegas

>>17234804
what features does this one have that the other one does not?

>>17234846
>those edlinks

>>17234846

>>17234846
You could have bought a vintage Omega and instead you got that. Fucking shame.

>>17234881
Why the fuck would I get a vintage moneysink you stupid faggot?

>>17234846
I dare you to post a wristshot.

>>17234846
I personally think that subsecond markings don't belong on a quartz watch, but it looks pretty nice nevertheless, enjoy it.

>>17234885
Instead you got a modern piece of crap. Congrats, moron.

>>17234850
Tide and moonphase, also it has the proper square shape (5600/5000) instead of the weird shape of the 561p

>>17234846
I don't see why people are shitting on this watch desu

>>17234846
>he actually fell for it

>>17234788
That's not a 5000u-1jf

>>17234921
>I don't see why people are shitting on this watch desu
Because he actually bought a watch instead of spamming about rolex

The nice man from Hamilton called me back, the entire swatch group was searching for a 2nd quartz field watch for me, and they found it in one of their euro warehouses.
They made it available just for me.
Maybe I should try asking for a 3rd kek

>>17234931
I'm getting a Rolex in a few months and I can appreciate Hamilton, nothing wrong with it. My grandpa wore a khaki king

>>17234909
They're for the minute hand, notice how it extends to the very edge.
>>17234921
This thread tends to seethe at my watch purchases.
You guys just don't get it.
It has a milled clasp by the way, the current mechanical one has a really shitty stamped one.

>>17234934
Why would you want to have double the crap?

>>17234946
>crap
You don't understand field watch kino.

>>17234718
Based retard
Why spend money on a fucking box

>>17234709
>*mogs every single one of those shitters*
nothin personnel kid

>>17234420
Wearing a cheap Russian made shitter now. probably realised it’s the wrong time to flex with six figure Lange & FPJ

>>17234968
If you had the kind of money to buy over a million dollars in watches you would be able to buy a nice watch box, the other give away that they're all fake is that you would have several smaller boxes because you would keep most of them in a safe when you're not wearing them.

>>17234975
So kinograph and forester posting is back?

>>17234968
That "collection" is filled with obvious filthy fakes, tho.

my humble collection

New apple watch ultra just dropped
Panerai is fucking done here

>>17234993
3 buttons, integrated lugs

This is fucking huge

>>17234995
Pelagoss fxd btfo

>>17234993
>>17234995
>>17234996
Pleb aspirational crap.
Buy a real watch.

>>17234989
Sub, gmt, daydate and DJ are great. I would personally sell the rest.

>>17232125
NEW
>>17235003
>>17235003
>>17235003

>>17235001
No one here actually wants it you autist, we're making fun of it. How dense are you?

>>17235006
I think its the best looking apple watch yet desu

>>17234942
the middle links and endlinks look like shit.
Just like Chidori.

>>17235010
That's not saying much

>>17235014

>>17234848
do they still make this?
it's sick

>5 inch wrists

aside from an hero, where do I begin?

>>17234127
franken watch/fake

>>17234788
this but with electroluminescence light