/fa/ - Fashion

i love my rolex uguu

>>17217358
I find it really odd how almost every desirable watch VC has released in the last few years is in the historiques collection. I think the Patrimony and to a lesser extent the Traditionelle desperately need some kind of update. Or, horror of horrors, actually release a new model.

VACHERON CONSTANTIN

>>17217358
i like my prx even if it’s a memewatch

>UWAAAAH ROLEX RELEASED A SMALLER VERSION OF THE BATMAN
>UWAAAAH BUT IT'S BIGGER THAN THE BATWOMAN
>UWAAAAAH WE COULD CALL IT THE BATPERSON
>UWAAAAAH :OOOO
>UWAAAAAH :OOOO
why are they like this?

The Holy Trinity
>Rolex
>Grand Seiko
>Cartier

Cope if you must, and you will

>>17217358
>Tissot PRX edition
God I hope they make a 35mm mechanical version with the dial pattern. I love the design of the watch and the execution is great for the pricepoint, but the 40mm size is too big for that style of watch for my tastes. A 35mm would be perfect.

>>17217377
GS is big boy tier and always has been

>>17217377
I will require proof that someone who owns any luxury watch has even met in person someone who wears a Timex or a San Martin, let alone shook hands with them over their mutual interest in watches.

Also, post evidence that a G-Shock has been worn with a turtleneck.

>>17217377
No watch brand in existence deserves to be in the helicopter category more than Damasko. It's a watch brand entirely for literal autists.

>>17217382
Wrong. You can hate GS as much as you like, but people don't buy them as copes for another brand. If you were to move them anywhere, it should be the category of people angry that no one else cares about the virtues of their brand, not the big boy category.

>>17217382
Respect GS miles more than omega.

what are the best watches for small wrist anons? 500-1000$ max

PLEASE BUY THIS $15K SHIT BAKA-GAIJIN

>>17217389
>No watch brand in existence deserves to be in the helicopter category more than Damasko. It's a watch brand entirely for literal autists.
Your submission will be reviewed by the comitee. Wait a few days, until the chart is reposted, to find about their resolution

>>17217396
Wery beauty full

Just picked up an Omega today! whatcha think?

>>17217389
So that's what the helicopter is supposed to represent.

>>17217399

forgot pic

>>17217396
>46.4mm
What in the hell are they doing over there?

>>17217404
thats a swatch

>>17217407
It has the Omega logo on it. It's an Omega.

>>17217376
Amen. Only need GS to complete the trinity.

Cope if you must and you will.

>>17217408
>omega
Might as well be a swatch.

>>17217376
>The Holy Shitty

>that'll be $59,000 + tip, sir

>>17217415
t. seething osmengma owner

>>17217413
Woops, sorry, wrong picture

Disgusting

>>17217376

>>17217431
Based. Saved.

>>17217413

parmigiani > piaget

that is all

>>17216919
what would be a cheaper alternative then?

are screen protectors for watches a dumb idea? i got my shitty $150 gshock in the mail yesterday and i'm worried about scratching the screen.

>>17217431
>Dear diary: it's been 8 months on the waiting list for a Rolex, I fear I'm beginning to go mad...

I actually got my posts deleted last thread even though I was not trolling. My take was that wearing a watch as a sign of wealth isn’t a new practice and people can do whatever they want in my book. If you like a watch because it makes you feel or look rich or if you enjoy the exclusivity it’s not uncommon with luxury items.

I own a sky d and a Seadweller stainless and they are showy but I also appreciate the design, the retention of value, and the prestige. Does that make me more of a douche than someone who just buys watches for horological reasons? Probably, but if my tastes change I can sell them at a value close to what I paid. Sucking up to ADs and flexing with a background BMW is pretty sad tho.

What Rolex do I buy my wife

Tell me immediately

>>17217470
King Midas

>gets you mugged tier
Richard
Rolex
>doesn't get you mugged
everything else

>>17217465
No one cares, the only point being made is that having four tiers of luxury brands on the chart is dumb because they all serve the same purpose of being expensive jewellery for men, in the same way enthusiast watches have specs and engineering to satisfy watch enthusiasts and consumer watches are just stuff to put in the jewellery shop in the mall.

>>17217470
get her a cute outfit for your ad first anon

Ended up coming from the mall yesterday with a brand new Speedmaster and not one but TWO bottles of Bois Imperial.

>Ended up coming from the mall yesterday with a brand new Speedmaster and not one but TWO bottles of Bois Imperial.

>>17217417

>>17217523
Literally inspired by nature. A watch with a view.

>>17217530
eah but it doesnt say rolex on it so you might as well just never buy it or think about it anti rolex hater retard hahah

>>17217530
seriously just buy a fucking rolex

>>17217530
refer to the chart and buy a rolex.

>>17217530
>doesn't say swiss made
just look at the chart, look at it.

>>17217533
>>17217536
>>17217540
>>17217542
So unbelievably based. Saving the thread.

>>17217476
Yeah that’s what I said too and it got deleted. It’s all expensive jewelry for show. People get mad and jealous if someone has better male jewelry than they do.

This image pretty much tells it all.

>>17217396
Looks pretty good actually. Shame about the size.

>>17217377
Chopper gang!

>>17217547
ugly pos shoulda bought a rolex

>>17217545
Shame about the maker.

>>17217547
chopper isn't good. refer to the chart buy a rolex and come back bitch fucking ugh bum motherfucker out right now

I put so much effort into posting the BEST chart for you guys and you just fucking ignore it. WHY?

>>17217567
You didn't posted the BEST chart™, I did.
I don't need (you)s, I do it as a service to high horology and for posters to remember their place.
You don't need to thank me.

>>17217417
It's fairly priced. The Micro-Artist Studio executes movements at a level not rivaled by most independents. Their anglage is literally Dufour tier and executed not just by hand but *manually* using flexible sticks loaded with polishing compound. It's insane.

>>17217580
No you didn't faggot. Stop pretending to be me.

>>17217572
>>17217581
Souless

>>17217533
>>17217536
>>17217540
>>17217542
>>17217543
>>17217551
>>17217559
>>17217562
>>17217567
Rolex ranks lower than Grand Seiko in the chart, retard

>>17217590
DONT POST THIS FAKE SHIT EVER EVER AGAI EVER I POST THE CHART EVERY FUCKING DAY SO YOU GUYS CAN LEARN TO BE LUXURY AND THIS IS HOW IM REPAID FUCK YOU BOIS IMPERIAL LOVING TARD

>>17217590
Thanks, anon, for this useful, insightful and, more important, accurate chart, chartanon. You truly are the best anon ln this threads.

>>17217590
I agree with this except Invocta is consumer too sorry

>>17217601
Invicta is High Luxury tier, El Rato himself said so

>>17217604
i unironically love this guy.

>>17217600
It's literally a rip off of MY fucking chart, RETARD.

>>17217562
>bitch fucking ugh bum motherfucker out right now
what?

>>17217610
Just charttard ESL anon having a normal one.

>>17217609
Stop trying to impersonate based chartanon, you poor piece of shit

>>17217613
You're the poorfag who hates Rolex and likes Omegay like an Amerifat loving cuck. Get the fuck out of my thread and refer to the fucking chart.

>>17217613
>impersonate
Are you new here? Chartfag always acts like this lmao.

>>17217620
>refer to the chart
>the chart rightfully features Rolex at consumer tier

>>17217625
Fake shitter poor chart I DIDN'T FUCKING POST AND DON'T FUCKING POST.

AYO
HOL UP
ROLEX FINNA DO BE LUXURY TIER
SPECIALLY IF IT'S AS ICIZZLE AS MINE
YA HOLLA IF YOU AGREE, CRACKA

>>17217637
It's high luxury read the chart seriously. And at least Rolexx dooesn't have to maek ads like Omega for black pieople

Charttard off his fucking rockers christ

>>17217641
>Rolex naturally attracts black people
>somehow, proud of it
anon-kun...

>>17217644
dubs of truth, chartfag is mentally ill, ESL and actually insane.

>Skip the last few threads
>Come back to chartard fighting himself
Just move the general back to /g/ please

It's that anon from Brasil who was begging people to buy him a Rolex a few years ago.

>>17217651
/g/ is full of poors who hate charts and use ugly things like thinkpad instead of macboks like rich normal people. do not move it back there period.

>>17217654
shut the fuck up and refer to the laptop chart, Thinkpad is high luxury tier (unlike consumerlex lmao)

>>17217373
If it's bigger than batwoman and smaller than batmat they should just call it black woman

SO much coping and seething over my chart today. You fucking love seeing poorfag americans SQUEAL

>>17217583
As someone who actually knows something about how much effort and dedication it takes to manually mirror polish metal, you have no idea how much passion goes into making something like that. No one would make things like that if they weren't passionate as hell about it.

>>17217662
putting Rolex in consumer tier was the right move

>>17217663
It's not Swiss - Made so it,s trash. REFER TO THE CHART

>>17217661
>batmat

>>17217581
Yes I know. Too bad they forgot to make it look good. Newer offerings are better but let's be honest. They don't compare well to others in the price range.

>>17217673
ugly milgauss rip off

>>17217675
>Rolex Milhouse
accurate, since its A DUD

>>17217675
Huh?

>>17217673
>big boy watches
Refer to the chart.

>chart mat

>>17217358
looks like a cheap knockoff of the PRX

>>17217681

>>17217470
Cartier tank

If you have to get a woman a Rolex get an oyster because they can't tell shit about watches

>>17217680
Sorry, Heuer isn't on there

Are only Rolexchads getting mugged? If I wear my Omega Seamaster 300 diver in LA will I be fine?

>refer to the chart

>>17217691
no rolex never gets mugged it's unironically a falseflag for people who are too poor to get one to dissaude people from buying one
>>17217688
its literally right there on the charet big bot tag heuer

>>17217699
>tag heuer
But that's not what it is

CHART CHART CHART CHART CHART CHART CHART CHART CHART CHART

>>17217702
>grand seiko isn't seiko
>heuer isn't tag heuer
And other things poors tell themselves to cope, seethe.

>>17217703
Here you go, fren

>>17217710
Stop posting this chart that rips off of me, now.

>>17217673
Awesome design. Unusual to see a two subregister chrono in that style. What movement does it use?

>>17217719
probably some shit movement like quartz since it's so low on the chart

>>17217710
>not a single microbrand
into the trash it goes

>>17217719
Thanks anon. Heuer Caliber 12

>>17217710
>My name is Hans Wilsdorf and I APPROVE this chart!

>>17217727
hans would hate this thread and all the poors

>>17217730
It's Mr. Wilsdorf for you, turkroach

>>17217732
I'm from France. But agian, cope if you must. and You will.

>>17217734
>I'm from [muslim country]
You made that clear

Can someone post more charts and Rolex shilling ? Please also call me poor

>>17217734
>I'm [brown]
That was obvious

Somebody is working on a Chronosport homage

I don't want to flex, but I finally got ny Bluesie :)
What do you think? It's my first luxury watch

>>17217759
Very cool, very classy

I know people hate on Invicta, but I'm a poorfag who wants a Submariner homage. Is this the best watch I can get for the money?

>>17217542
At some point I thought this was just trolling but seeing it in every thread made it clear that you a are just mentally disturbed or a subhuman niglet

>>17217780
You could spend a little bit more for a San Martin, which are leagues better.
But if you are locked on that sub-100 budget, yeah, they are unbeatable

>>17217780
I have one and I take it with me when I go traveling

>>17217672
Design, within reason, is a matter of subjective taste. I was only commenting on the quality being appropriate for the price point. It's not my cup of tea for haute horlogerie, but they don't have any trouble selling them so clearly there are enough people out there who appreciate them enough aesthetically to pony up.

Now that Seiko Instruments is developing their own Micro-Artist Studio equivalent under the GS brand, I'll be interested to see the direction they go. The Kodo constant force tourbillon was pretty interesting, technically and aesthetically, and wildly different to Seiko Epson's M-A S watches.

>>17217756
Sexy gook shit

>>17217726
Ah, it's a 2892 with a Dubois-Depraz module, yes? Have you had it serviced? If so, did the watchmaker replace the module or service it? I always am curious to hear how watchmaker handle those types of chronos in vintage watches.

>>17217677

which one? i was thinkin the top one, now not sure

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3qccZDHuPE

lol

>>17217782
you're a subhuman poorfag who hates rolex for no fucking reason

anyone own the NTTD Seamaster? Thinking about buying this or the Moonwatch as my first luxury watch.

>>17217831
I hope not. if anyone here does. It means, they diidn't listen to the BEST chart.

>>17217377
Where does GANT fall into these categories?

>>17217831

just get this omega instead:

https://www.swatch.com/en-ca/bioceramic-moonswatch.html

Every time I come back in this thread and see people fucking around with MY BEST chart I feel like breaking something .

>>17217855
Ugly Rolex President cope watch. Seriously, just get a Rolex.

>>17217831
I don't own that watch, but personally I would go for the 3861 moonwatch over that thing and it isn't close.

>>17217846

too bad. nobody cares how you feel it's all shit-posting and pissing into piss oceans here. your opinion doesn't matter except to dunk on.

>>17217831
I'd get the 3861 moonwatch personally, but you do you.

>>17217864
The BEST chart is more than just a chart. Retard.

I’ve really enjoyed watching charttard dominate all you poorfag cucks. Just buy a Rolex.

>>17217824
Rubber bracelet with screws in it?
Dunno how i feel about that

>>17217831
Get a 42mm planet ocean instead

>>17217877

wrong. I'm dunking on IT, and on YOU as we speak. You can't stop it, you can only accept it.

>>17217722
No one cares about microbrands.

>>17217824
"White" dial

>mfw my high-end watch collection

>>17217377
>NOO YOU CAN'T WEAR THAT mindset
dumb and harmful for self evident reasons
as long as a watch can tell the time reasonably accurately and looks good there is no reason to not use it
nothing wrong with vostok or hamilton or whatever
this is coming from a guy who only owns supposedly approved brands, a citizen and a g shock and a cartier
>>17217388
I would do this exact combo if my turtleneck didn't have sleeves too narrow to accommodate my mtg-900

>>17217367
how often do you adjust the time

>>17217916
refer to the chart

>>17217780
I loved my Invicta, I didn't even know what a submariner was before i bought it. I gave it to my brother and he enjoys it now.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4HJ8Mb5NqBg

Would you buy his Rolex?

>>17217919
every few days because it makes my dick hard when its exact

but its very accurate usually losing around 1 second per day

>>17217930
>fluted bezel doesn't shine anymore
fuck no

>>17217931
decent

Unironically the only good chart

>>17217934
my watches

>>17217920
do you have the slightest idea how autistic it is to respond to people replying to your chart with "refer to my shitty chart"

>>17217956
Do you have any idea how autistic and stupid you are for not referring to the chart and purchasing a Rolex?

>>17217945
Should probably refer to the chart, sell that ugly breitling and tag heuer and get another Rolex.

>>17217969
didnt i quite literally climb the chart? god damn chartfag you need to get help

>>17217972
rolex is the only true watchmaker in the world everything else is a pathetic imitation of rolex's greatness

>>17217945
My collection:
Casio G-Shock DW5600E-1V
Citizen Eco-Drive BM8180-03E

Fav watch all time picrel:
Casio W71

Looking to get Seiko Turtle SRPE93 for automatic

>>17217972
You eventually got a Rolex, but you still have two cope and seethe watches in your collection. Every dollar spent on that Shitling and Tag HueHue coulda been used to either upgrade your Rolex to a better model or a Rolex Explorer.

>>17217972
You misunderstand the chart. Your collection is being held back by the shitter Breitling and Tag Huehue. (If you want to keep the Tag, you can just tell people it was a gift from a relative who lives in a flyover state.)

Sell the Breitling, then sell the Rolex and get a non-entry level Rolex, or move up a level on the chart and get something really top end.

>>17217945
lol get a real Rolex retard this is embarrassing

>>17217987
>>17217985
>>17217979
post your rolexs or just kiss my feet

t. crown owner

>>17217982
maybe the chart is right cuz the casioguy is the only sane person here

>>17217993
post your own Rolex, faggot.

>>17217989
post yours

Meanwhile I"m just sitting here with my Citizen Fugu, ironically eating some sea food.

>>17217997
fake or entry-level shit incoming...

>>17217993
>>>17217979 (You)
>post your rolexs or just kiss my feet
i was just larping as rolex guy for one post as a bit of a goof

>>17217997
its literally the first post of the thread

>>17217993
jokes on you i jerk off to feet

>>17218005
So I guess >>17218002 was right. Nice.

>>17217780
A Seiko or even a Casio would be a better investment, if only for build quality reasons. Or you can buy a decent replica for about $300-$500, people on here couldn't even tell the difference.

>>17218012
show me yours or you’re legit just seething

>>17217945
>>17217982
My collection:
1971 King Seiko 45-7001
1973 King Seiko 5256-8010
1973 Omega Speedmaster Mark 4.5
16223 Rolex Datejust
Citizen pmd56-2952
Seiko Solar Tuna SNE497 upgraded with steel shroud.
Seiko SKX upgraded with 6R15c and sapphire crystal.
A couple of Vostoks
An Escapement Time VH31 with a case I hand polished to fix the divots left by using a buffing wheel on it.

And just recently I bought a Seiko SRPH77k1 (not my pic, but pic is a good one of the watch) after not buying any watches in a long time. I really like several aspects of the design a lot and it was actually a good value compared to most Seiko divers these days, so fuck it, why not.

>>17218016
two tone dj is based to me
i was considering it but i like the blue best

like the seiko too

>>17218015
I've already posted mine before.
You enjoy your grampa's watch though.
I'm happy for you.

>>17218015
>gets called out for having entry level shit
>demands others show off their own entry level shit
ok....

>>17218022
>wont post his watch
>i legitimately just bought a 3235 less than 2 weeks ago

ok faggot

>>17218028
Refer to the chart bitch.

>>17218027
i’m waiting for anything nicer than what i have to be posted lmfaoooo

>>17217855
Nice hairless legs

>>17218017
The DJ was my dad's. Two tone isn't normally my vibe, but the watch has sentimental value for me so I just put it on brown leather so I could wear it.

Thanks on the Seiko. Been happy with the movement in it too, running around +5 SPD out of the gate is quite nice for a 4R movement.

>>17217831

My first luxury watch.

The titanium makes it so light it's probably the most comfortable watch I've ever worn. Got a few compliments on it too.

>>17218032
Fine. Mine's not as dressy, as yours, but I don't need to get dressed up anymore so IDGAF.

>>17217756
Link? I need details

>>17218034
damn it looks nice on the leather too dude
beautiful watch.

cant complain on +5 idk why but all my watches seem to run slow
the breitling and rolex are both in range but the rolex loses around 1spd and the breitling is 3-4 spd
id rather them be a little faster instead deeesssuuu

>>17218040
i dont like the sea dweller and dont consider it nicer than mine lol

enjoy the rolex though james cameron

>>17218039
Based. How much was it?

>>17218034
What happened to the bracelet? Too stretched to wear or "your dad" (ebay) didn't sell it on the bracelet?

>>17218048
>uh....I like mine better
that's some fucking cope, right there. the sea-dweller is real shit. the dateJUST is an entry-level dad's watch.

>>17218048
OK. Here's an older pic of my GMT. You like those?

>>17218048
DateJust is the cheapest of cheap anon.

>>17218051
>recently buying the rolex i configured online
>m-mine’s REAL SHIT NUKKA

lol

>>17218044
>the rolex loses around 1spd
Oh god, -1 spd is my least favourite rate. I'd rather a watch run +5 than -1, but I'm autistic and like to correct my mech watches pretty regularly.

I'm friendly with my local independent watchmaker and so he did me a favour and dialed in the adjustment on the 3135 in that DJ to the point that it ran at +0 SPD for several months afterwards. It was wild.

The chart is making everyone cope, seethe today. I told you you must if you must you will.

>>17218048
Lesson one in trying to flex: there's always someone with a nicer watch than you who is only tolerating your little song and dance.

>>17218049

Got mine for £6.5k but I've seen it upwards of £7k now.

>>17218053
pretty dope but i woulda got it on the oyster band personally

>>17218056
damn that sounds pretty cool. im pretty amazed on the accuracy overall though

>>17218060
Really funny he thinks he referred to my chart when he still owns a Tag HuEhUe.

>>17218062
>pretty dope but i woulda got it on the oyster band personally
If it was the old hollow link Jubilee, definitely. Those things wore out very quickly.
The new solid-link Jubilee is just as durable as an Oyster but still has the wonderful comfort.
My nigga with the blue dial DJ will back me up on this. The Jubilee feels like silk.

>>17218060
i can sleep soundly knowing i have the exact watch i wanted lol

if you posted a new white gold presidential with a meteorite bezel i’ll seethe
i’m good though

>>17218061
That's it? I had a much higher figure in my mind for some reason.

>>17218063
You don't know who you're referring to, ESL. Go back to seething and let the people with jobs talk.

>>17218072
Cope if you will, and you must..

>>17218068
>I have the watch I wanted...except for a WG Day-Date
hahaha, the seething never stops!

>>17218066
i am the guy with the blue dial dj

it is reeeeally nice haha
i just like the look better for the gmt with the oyster. the jub makes it too dressy for my taste

>>17218071

They are quite reasonably priced. Even the one with the titanium strap is £8k.

>>17218062
>im pretty amazed on the accuracy overall though
Rolex does a great job adjusting their movements these days. I hope more brands follow the example set by them and Omega and start guaranteeing really tight precision tolerances. In general, it should be possible for any free sprung balance movement maker to offer a significantly better than COSC precision guarantee. It's not really *that* hard to achieve on that type of movement.

I came here expecting something better than reddit watch forums, instead its just another indian rolex shilling site.

>>17218082
It's just charttard. He shits up the fragrance general like this too.

>>17218081
>I hope more brands follow the example set by them and Omega and start guaranteeing really tight precision tolerances.
Plenty of brands do.
JLC has their 1000 hours control thing.
Cartier apparently has their own in-house standard, they just don't market it. FWIW, every Cartier I've ever owned has been +/- 2 SPD.

>>17218086
Cartier is garbage compared to Rolex.

>people actually started posting watches
About time

>>17218098
nice collection bro

>>17218098
>trash
refer to the chart
>mediocre
the chart.
>OMEGAY
disgusting. out of my thread
>gshock
trash

>>17218120

>>17218098
I have that gshock too, what made you get it? I figured it was like the only full gold watch I’d consider

>>17218098
Nice watches. That Cartier is lovely.

>>17218133
its really not

>>17218102
>>17218133
Thanks!
>>17218131
I don't know. It was an impulse purchase. I don't really like the bracelet, I have a resin 5610 that I wear a lot more.

>>17218120
>>17218123
>cant wash hands

>>17218086
This is true, and both Zenith and Grand Seiko are both known to adjust their movements well beyond their stated precision guarantees as well. Still, I'd like to see a more public embracing of a +/- 2 SPD style standard by more brands.

>>17218136
Hand sanitizer.

>>17218098

>chad Speedmaster and G shock enjoyer

Hello, fellow Man of culture.

The most KINO Omega watch.

>>17218098
>this guy has probably been called a retarded ESL poorfag multiple times in the last few threads
kek

>>17218151
Looks like a retarded wannabe Rolex.

>>17218156
which rolex looks like that

>>17218163

None, because Rolex is boring and inferior to Omega in every way.

>>17218151
Looks like a toy, why would you want a shitty drawing of Earth and random meridians and shit unless you were a LARPing kid? That's not how actual tools look like, that's how "I AM EXPLORER OF WORLD FIRST KIT FOR PRIMARY SCHOOL GRADE 6 YEAR OLD CHILD MONGOLESE" playset watches look like.

>>17218172
Chartfag, your favorite watch is the Explorer and the MUH SCIENCE Milgauss.

reposting my orient watch that the south korean president hands out to people he visits or guests of honors.

>>17218192
trash it and get a rolex.

>>17218123
twin barrels in series

>>17218194
Fuck off retard

>>17218151
>Not the 321 Speedmaster
You fucked up.

>>17218194
i wish i could afford one.

>>17218196
Refer to the chart.

Angelage more like anal ass

>>17218192
that's cool as hell

>>17218098
>>17218149
>>17218197
Very nice, my basedmaster brothers.

>>17218192
Very nice and unique, friendo. May I ask how did it end up in your hands?

>Chartfag spent his entire Sunday sperging out over other men's jewelry
Sad

>he told me my foot is in the door again


ugh

>>17218228
hope you give mean footjobs

>>17218123
any luxury watches should have 20bar water resistant, no exception. If a $50 casio can do it, why cant a $30k? Fucking embarrassing for them to proudly put 5bar up there then charge people off their ass

>>17218233
to make you go back for servicing of course

>>17218233
Unironically love my Duro.

>>17218233
I don't even know how water resistant any of my watches are. That's a strange thing to fixate on.

>>17218233
In order to better waterproof an elegant case, like of a Calatrava, A Reverso, a Duometre or a Souverain, for example, the design would demand considerable changes that would also make the case ugly and unbalanced.
It's unpractical, illogical and unneeded.

>>17218241
If it's low enough you can fuck it up with only a little water. I had a watch with near no resistance and after enough times of walking with it in rain, mold started to grow on the dial since small droplets managed to get inside.

>>17218241
you should pay more attention to what you are buying anon. Otherwise, you would be easily branded as consoomer

>>17218245
LOL What did you bought?

>>17218245
Why don't you tell me about it? Most of my watches are under 5 bars. I wear them in the rain and wash my hands with no issues.
>>17218247
More like I understand what is important with respect to wristwatches to me. I don't give a damn if a dress watch has 200m of water resistance because that's absurd.

>>17218247
have you ever needed 50 bar water resistance? or even 5 bar? lol

>>17218233
>>17218245
>>17218247
>He doesn't understand water resistance.

>>17218258
>>17218254
>>17218245
>>17218233
Very important

>>17218266
retarded guide

>>17218266
Then, don't watch your car, shower, swim, or dive with your 5 atm watch on. As simple as that.

>>17217464
nice casios anon

>>17218240
holy based
where did you get that jubilee?

>>17218278
why did you post this

>>17218290
sissy

based sagara gunso wears a proper field watch on a nato strap

>>17217687
This is the correct answer. Women have infinitely more respect for Cartier than Rolex.

>>17217358
caged by time

>>17218293
It's always odd when they go out of their way to show a watch in anime like that.

>>17218299
Makes perfect sense in FMP

Gauron has a daytona

>>17218293

Casio

>>17217358
what a girly wrist

>>17218293
I'm a huge FMPfag so I might actually get a khaki

>>17218318
save up and get a rolex. refer to the chart.

>>17218323
kill yourself faggot.

>>17218325
Poorfag.

>>17218328
nigger

>>17218330
This is my thread, I don;t just post the chart for you to shit up my thread with anime. REFER. to the char

>>17218334
Are Rolexfags the macfags of the watch world?

>>17218334
refer to these nuts nigger

>>17218336
No. We are the only brand that matters.

>>17218337
Hamilton isn't even Luxury. you do not live a life of Luxury like me. I have a Rolex. sooo.. refer to the chart.

>>17218346
refer to these luxury nuts nigger

>ctrl f chart
>76 responses
holy cringe esl frenchfag

>>17217605
I enjoy his enthusiasm and genuine love for all watches. Based El rato.

>>17218334
What are you gonna do about it? Sperg harder?

Can anyone ID this watch?

>>17218395
Cope if you must, and you will.

>>17218402
So yo can’t do anything? Seethe harder then

>>17218412
You're coping, and seething, at my chart.

>>17218396
Rolex Submariner

>>17218413
>Still more accurate than your average rolex

>>17218427
not luxury refer to the chart

>>17217358
Honestly after wasting so much money yr on watches over the years I find ymself just wearing the f91w most of the time as my daily.

Tbh for a daily all you really need is either a citizen ecodrive (with a black leather strap) or an f91w. Then maybe treat yourself to another watch for special occasions. Unassuming, doesn't look try hard cringe, fits most lifestyles. And dont have to worry about damaging or scratching it.

>>17218460
I've ended up with a Seiko automatic for a dress watch, F91W for an all-rounder and Apple Watch for if I'm at work or exercising.

omega sneedmaster

>>17218427
that's why those in the know wear oysterquartz

>>17218469
>oyster quartz
Wait, Rolex has quartz models now?

>>17218472
Not anymore.
They did, in the past, but the japanese mogged them so hard they ran back to making automatics like the rest of the swiss """luxury""" industry

>>17218472
Yeah, it was a Tissot PRX homage

>>17218462
refer to the chart

>>17218474
And now Rolex is worth more than the entire Japanese watch industry. Whoops.

>>17218483
Wich one.
There are two charts, one is correct and the other features Rolex as a luxury brand.
I guess you want me to refer to the accurate one, right?
Which means that seiko+casio+apple is a pretty good combo (per the chart)

>>17218487
I'm not a Rolex stockholder, how much money they make is irrelevant to me
They will always make inferior quartz watches to the japanese, which is what matters to me as a (potential) customer, and Rolex will admit that themselves.

>>17218494

>>17218149
>chad
>50m water resistance

>>17218266
can't go diving with a 200m Seiko diving watch with a screw down crown....

Whats going on with this backside?