/fa/ - Fashion

First for love Seiko
Love Citizen

Cope if you must, and you will.

Still looking for a cheap interesting tonneau semi-dress watch that's vintage-ish but not too tiny.

Curious what you guys think about the Seadweller

>>17195660
>SG
kys

>>17195660
easily mistaken for an invicta

>>17195653
morning frenchtard esl

>>17195665
>>17195663

Wow the cope is unreal. Seething because no Rolex. I just bought this one and my girlfriend loves it. My friends are mad jelly and so are you.
Enjoy your seiko and waifu pillow Kek

Ok I’m done trolling. I was on the list for this and had second thoughts. Thanks for talking me out of it :^)

Finally found the right shade of khaki/olive strap to match and the buckle is even the spring bar-less type.

>>17195660
It's basically a beefed up version of the Submariner.
The newer versions (126600) are ridiculously large and thick. You really have to be a big guy to sport these. Or use them as an actual diving watch, but who does that, right?
The older versions (16600) have the same diameter as previous gen Subs but are thicker and sturdier. They were also the very first Rolex to use solid endlinks and glidelock clasp. These watches features many of most recent Rolex innovations. Very kino watch.

>>17195645
Looks like a Bulova.
You can get one at the mall.

>>17195669
>I was on the list for this and had second thoughts. Thanks for talking me out of it :^)
Two-tone modern Sea-Dweller is a fashion faux pas. The steel version is great but as I said you really have to be a big guy to be able to wear these without looking like a child who borrowed his dad's Submariner.
Two-tone Submariner is a fun "fuck you watch". My only complain is the maxi-case.

>>17195696
I’m a big guy (for you). I have 7.75 inch wrists. I’m on the waiting list for the regular sd and the two tone. Something kind of irks me about the watch, but I can’t put my finger on it. Most Rolexes look funny on me because of my grug wrist

>>17195703
It’s very a utilitarian watch historically, yeah so the two tone is a weird choice in that regard.

new budget swiss tourbillion just dropped

>>17195696

I used to own one. It was way too big. If I were Dwayne Johnson it would have looked fine.

Anyways, IMO all ceramic bezel Rolexes have been ruined by their braindead owners. I don't want to be associated with a bunch of no-style bandwagoner snobs. Buy vintage or modern polished metal bezel Rolexes if you have to.

after searching for a 19mm strap i realized there just aren't any good ones which are also short for my tiny wrists so I went to Etsy and commissioned one with custom dimensions, really looking forward to trying it on, also cute message from vietnam waifu

>>17195748
looks pretty promising

Tudor

>>17195698
model number? cant find any that looks close.

>>17195757
>he trusted the esl poster

>>17195725
How much?

>>17195748
>>17195750
nice one, paul

>>17195748
that's a man

>>17195765
About 4k.

>>17195660
Slightly less boring and void of personality than Submariner.

>>17195817
Objets don't have personalities anon.
People do.

>>17195660
the sea dweller 4000 is great, its just a better submariner date
I wish I bought one when they were under 10k just three years ago

>>17195653
Money + taste + need a watch

>>17195839
fuck i want a reverso so bad, are there cheaper alternatives that still have the reversing gimmick?

>>17195852

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfnogxammOU

>>17195865
disliked and closed YouTube instantly after :)

>>17195839
It does look nice but 21.600 vph is revolting for a 8k+ watch. And manual winding is a pain in the ass, especially with only 40h PR.
>inb4 "it's a small watch"
Oris is using an ETA based movement in its rectangular watch. 28.800 vph, self winding, 38h PR. The case is 25mm x 38mm x 10mm. Pretty sure JLC can do better than Oris and ETA.
>inb4 "a Reverso should always be manual winding"
No.

>>17195865
Die of AIDS pls.
>>17195870
Based.

do any OCEANUS chads have experience with the womens models? I want a titanium oceanus but I am a gigawristlet who likes wearing small watches

picrel OCW-S350-1AJF

Which one ?

>>17195898
Middle?

>>17195653
I have more money than your family combined and wear a VSF, let that sink in.

>>17195898
left, the mid and right ones are fucking ugly

>>17195898
Middle or right, the left one looks a bit underwhelming, and this is coming from someone that usually prefers watches without numerals.

>>17195898
I like middle one out of the three. That being said I want to get this one when they get cheaper.

>>17195909
They're all ugly.

>>17195916
The hands are a bit much
>>17195918
I like that design, sans cyclops

>>17195918
This colorway looks so much more pleasant than the vomit-inducing green and gold.

for me its the sneedmaster

>>17195936
Nice Moonswatch, but for me it's the Mission to Uranus edition.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLOyphBHsSU

SUCK IT ENTRYFAGS

>>17195936

Hello Speedbrother.

>>17195956
it really makes you feel like uranus
>>17195960
nice looks like a virgin

Just ordered pic related with an extra $20 to wear as an economical daily driver. Wanted a cheap explorer lookalike with a sapphire crystal and a decent movement. How'd I do?

>>17195956
Remember when they've announced these and every retarded Youtubers were like "WOW THIS IS SO FUCKING GREAT"?
>250$/€
>piece of plastic crap that breaks after 2 weeks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sfJd5UE0NMQ
>shit quartz movement
>Omega logo
How is this acceptable?
I honestly still don't get it.

bitch my rolex on fleek

Should i buy this seiko? Its around 500 bucks

>>17196003
Your pictures are always blury and out of focus. Why can't you take a proper picture of the fucking watch?

>>17196010
Don't be too hard on him, he probably has more money than brains; he did buy a Rolex after all.

Thoughts?

>>17196010
google it lol

>>17196017
yes

Uhhhh bro’s we aren’t the male version of this are we

>>17195865
based
>>17195879
cringe

>>17195672
well, do share.

>>17196030
>google it lol
I know what the DJ looks like, retard.
You're lucky enough to own one of the best watches ever made, do it justice and post some nice pictures.

>>17196006
I really want it, can't decide between the grey bezel or black bezel one.

>>17196049
Black safest choice. Grey looks very nice tho.

>>17195660
A two tone Seadweller is like buying a Land Rover that's been slammed and had chrome spinners put on it, it completely clashes with the purpose of the design.

>>17195876
The JLC movement is free sprung, better adjusted, way better finished, and way thinner than the ETA in the Oris you nonce.

>>17195907
Based repchad

>>17196034
the funny and yet intensely disturbing aspect to this photo is that this chick is so self-involved that she takes a picture of her emotional expression at point of purchase, but doesn't think to show us the actual bag

Cope, if you must, and you will.

>>17196108
I noticed that. it might be the insanely small package wrapped on the counter, she didn't want to show off the cheapest thing in the store.

>>17195656
This was my best find so far btw. It's really not that great.

>>17195972
I dunno, it's you who bought cretina

>>17196113
it's possible you're more charitable than i, since my mind immediately leaped to aggressive self-absorption rather than not wanting to show her haul

>>17195918
SPB197? There are so many new Alpinists that it is getting hard to keep up.

>>17195972
dont know anything about certina but I dont mind this at all, quite nice looking. Surely retail price is too much but good cop at that price

Did you cop cause of the anon in the last thread who posted the Certina Precidrive quartz models? I'm quite intrigued by the Precidrive models cause I wasn't aware that Certina made HAQ watches (as long as it's true they're within +/- 10 sec per year)

What’s your take on the Pelagos?

>>17195972
Why didn’t you get a San Martin?

Any Monaco chads present?

>>17196147
Submarinerlet cope.

>>17196141
Correct

>>17196156

>>17196147
great watch, fantastic bracelet but a bit thicc overall

>>17196157
Tell me you have a tiny wrist without telling me you have a tiny wrist.

>>17196160
Some men don’t need a crown on their watch for the crown is already on their head, king.

Thoughts on this?

>>17196170
I hate this watch, I bought my Casio AD a gift card for 10 dollars to Applebees and keep buying FN91W casios but he still hasn’t gotten it in. I think I’m just going to go gray.

I would rather wear rolecks

I really like this watch, which I didn't knew before. Opinions? Based or cringe?

Oh boy I want a Rawlecks!
Spend 50k on jewelry and watches you don’t need. Suck up to AD, buy him certificates, come into beg for the watch for a year. Get edged by magazines sent by AD; fap furiously but can’t come. Finally the call comes, you run out of your middle management jobs office full speed Naruto-run. You show up and thank the AD for this option to pay 15k to him, almost tearing up. “Do you want to wear it out?” “Omg yes!”
> get stabbed by Jabari

Or

Don’t wear it and put in a safe and take it out for photos in your house. Let people know how jelly they are of you. Lock back in safe. Wear a Tudor because you don’t want to get robbed.

Just duct tape a bathroom scale on your wrist. It’s cheaper

>>17196186
Show your watches, I'll wait.

How gay are diamonds? Can I wear this as a hetmale?

>>17196190
not him but you got mad because you wanted to pay 10gs for a miniature granny bathroom scale KEK

Based off how Assmad you are I’m guessing you bought it. OH NO NO NO HAHAHHA

>>17196193
Diamonds are a girl's best friend, ever heard of that saying? If you must wear a precious gemstone, wear a Sapphire.

>>17195645
opinions? i just made this.

>>17196180
It reminds me of this watch that I have

>>17196193
That’s hot, looks good with a dress and heels

>>17196198
>Spending 10k for an entry level Rolex
Go big or go home, what's even the point of buying a Rolex if it's not a Datejust or Submariner?

>>17196201
Go big or go home
Entry level
Pick one
Poverty ascended

>>17196201
I've seen oysters go for 8 or 9k, it dosen't hold up as well as it's more expensive siblings in the grey market.

>>17196202
If you're going to buy a Rolex, get something that is actually worth something. No an entry level shitter that dosen't even show the date or is not a dive watch. Only poors buy Oyster Perpetuals.

>>17196206
Not an entry level shitter*

Where my shitters at?

>>17196147
The best mechanical tool watch diver on the market, outright. Rugged movement design (against shock), titanium with superior catastrophic damage resistance than normal steel, highly functional design with all matte finishes to aid legibility, and the spring loaded auto-adjusting clasp is a masterpiece.

>>17196183
good luck jabari!

>>17196201
>Spending 10k for a watch that dosen't even show the date
>A $3 shitter Aliexpress quartz watch shows the date while the entry level Rolex dosen't. Sorry sweety you have to pay an extra 8k for that feature
Ohnonono AHAHAHAHAHA!

>>17196193
Not a fan of diamonds.

>>17196214
gib boi pucci

>>17196214
Based on the S&W, I would say that you are actually poorer than the jabaris

>>17196214
Jamal and Muhammad robs people in packs, they don't do it alone. If Jamal is a gangbanger, him and his brothas also have guns on them.

>>17196214
Nice Drof Mot undies

>>17196223
i never claimed to be rich
only to have a rolex

youd also be surprised on how fast t shirt quality plateaus out. all saints are pretty good quality ive found.

>>17196199
I kinda like it for my girlfriend, desu.

>>17196147
I really like how it looks, but the size kills it for me, so idc

>>17196214
>swiss watch
>no swiss gun
get a sphinx you tool

I was able to try the new Baltic that will be revealed tomorrow.
>vintage chronograph with 3 subdials
>no date
>39mm I think?
>cream dial
>side profile very similar to the Speedmaster (inverted bezel and domed crystal)
>manual winding
>steel bracelet with polished side links and brushed center links
Wasnt able to take pictures obviously.
It looks really fucking cool. Limited edition so I expect flippers to buy them all and sell them for x2 on C24.

>>17196284
Too bad I can't wear it because I'm bald.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NrTEnE2oi3Q

Why does my watch keep time better when I wear to bed?

>>17196284

>cream dial

Interesting.

Speaking of which, I saw a video of a new Parmigiani that will be released next month, I’m not sure if correct but it will have some kind of lavender or purple dial- maybe in LE. The salmon dial was epic

Omega

>>17196296
lmao $2k for a quartz shitter?

>history
>story
>patina
>craftmanship
>gift to theoretical grandchildren
>SWISS MADE
>Submarine in a past life
>The moon in a past life
>James Bond in a past life
>An explorer in a past life
>A samurai in a past life
>AD relationship
>casual conversation starter

>>17196313
It’s a cool omega, I like it, I won’t even troll you. On a side note, I really don’t like the direction omega has taken as a company. It wants to charge luxury prices to create some level of exclusivity, but they end up tossing their watches on the gray market brand new because they can’t sell them at 60% the price. Not to mention the moonswatch.

Never buy an omega white market, it is a mistake I wouldn’t wish on you lads.

>>17196114
https://zenmarket.jp/en/auction.aspx?itemCode=v1054219107
https://zenmarket.jp/en/auction.aspx?itemCode=e1044582944
https://zenmarket.jp/en/auction.aspx?itemCode=h1057419718
https://zenmarket.jp/en/auction.aspx?itemCode=u1055489779
https://zenmarket.jp/en/auction.aspx?itemCode=m1055437118

>>17196006
yes!


recently got a seiko bellmatic bc it just looked great and was well taken care of/refurbed and just felt great on the wrist. 17 jewels which would place it in the 70s not 60s bc there was a extra import tax on anything over a certain amount of jewels. Cheap price and works great. Do you guys like it?

>>17196326
Anytime you hear any of these buzzwords opinion should go straight to the trash

>>17196313

PUT SOME CLOTHES ON

>citizen

>>17196180
Chronoswiss is a weird brand
Anway they are fully capable of making nice watches and that seems like a decent example

>>17195653
Based. Reddit is full of faggots with boxes of 50 $500 shitters and it's a complete waste of money, it's not practical, it's not cheap and no one is impressed by it since they're mostly shitty watches and you're only wearing one watch at a time.

If you have fuckloads money, don't need a watch and you're also autistic you could think about a Lange or Credor, but then that's just for you

>>17196369
esl samefag lol

>>17196313
Nobody wants to see your dirty feet, you weirdo.
>>17196328
The Aqua Terra is a nice watch. Best looking Omega IMO.
The problem with Omega is the inconsistent design language. The AT shares no design features with the Seamaster 300 (despite sitting in the Seamaster line), the Constellation or the Speedmaster. I often have the feeling you could stamp any logo from any soulless sports watch brand (like Rado or whatever) on most Omega, and it would work.
Not to mention the fact they're completely ignoring their back catalogue. Pic related is revolting and basically shows no respect to the old Omega.

>>17195989
"People are retarded" is a good way to understand this and lots of things.

Also, "people are so retarded they play mimicry games while not even realizing it". If it's got SOMETHING some actually decent watch has then that shitter becomes desirable, even if the feature of the decent watch being mimicked isn't even a special point of the watch

So:
>shitter+OMEGA LOGO= GOOD (moon swatch)
>shitter+OCTAGON=GOOD (casioak because it looks like an AP)
>shitter+light blue dial=GOOD (looks like the Patek Tiffany watch)

No one is going to think some tard is actually walking around with a Patek Tiffany, but these tards have been made so confused they think the Patek Tiffany is special because that shade of blue is so special

>his watch is in the top 6 r*ddit watches
oh no no no no
>captcha: m0gpd

>>17196381
yet you saw it

>>17196020
MOGGED

>>17196359
For the 3% of their watches that aren't bloated mallshitters and capeshit etc., yeah

>>17196386
>rolex
>seiko
>tudor
>omega
>all leddit as fuck
least surprising thing ever

>>17196381
>Not to mention the fact they're completely ignoring their back catalogue. Pic related is revolting and basically shows no respect to the old Omega.
Why would you expect the conglomerate that completely destroyed the old Omega to have any respect for it? It's truly a shame Seiko didn't succeed in buying Omega, as at least they wouldn't have liquidated Omega's in-house design and manufacturing capabilities the way the Swatch Group did.

>>17196386
>Rolex
>Omega
NPC watches.

>>17195881
>>17195898
>>17195906
>>17195907
>>17195918
>>17195936
>>17195956
>>17195960
>>17195972
>>17195989
>>>
> Anonymous 08/17/22(Wed)06:53:06 No.17195
JUSTY UBY A FUCKING ROLEX

Is a Sinn 104 worthwhile or should I just get a Casio digital and stop trying?

>>17196409
BUY A ROLEX YOU POORFAGGOT

>>17196409
just get a ROLEX ROLEX ROLE XROLEX ROLEX

>>17196409
Get it, you’ll like it and there is a decent chance you’ll never buy another watch

>>17196380
>seething garbage-collecting redditor

>>17196415
No he wont he will always want a rolex lol hahahah

>>17196409
casio digital until
>>17196412
>>17196414
you get a ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX
ROLLING IN MY ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX
ROLL UP
HOLD UP
OH WAIT I GOT MY
ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX

>>17196420
t.esl frenchie samefag

When you guys dont buy rolex i hit my desk hard

>>17196415
I'm just worried I'll always run into people with a Rolex and they'll laugh at me desu

I guess I could just rob them

>>17196040
LOL DJ ONE OF THE BEST WATCHES EVER MADE it's not even considered as a good watch to Rolex collectors.

>>17196404
>JUSTY UBY A FUCKING ROLEX

No.

>>17196444
YOIU MOTHER FUCKER YOU SHOULKD BUY A ROLEX SO YOU WILL NEVER HAVE TO THIN K ABOUT TIT AGAIN AIOJHDSFOIJFDSAOIJFDSOIJDFSAIO

>muh Rolex
Rolex can not compete with this level of finish and visual appeal.

>>17196448
C O P E
O
P
E

>>17196448
just buy a rolex ROLE XROLE XROLEX IT EVERNT FUCKING SASYTS IT IN THE RING BUYSTIAJR PLEASE PLEASPLEASPLEASPEL

Listen here, i've been here since 2020 and we've always shit on non rolex brands. if you hate rolex your'e a cuck who doesn't like trump and is a leftie

>>17196457
you'll never see this on a Seiko masterpiece. many such cases with Rolex. disgusting.

i broke my monitor because of you guys shitting on rolex

>>17196427
>mfw I'm the frenchie who traumatized this retard to the point he thinks everyone itt is me

Uh-oh Rolex sisters, I don't feel so good.

>>17196474
Would you feel better if I smeared some feces straight from gujarat on your watch?

>>17196473
Afternoon ESL, do the needful and suck your AD off for the explorer with some teeth.

oh no nO NONO NO NO NO NO
>IT'S HAND FINISHED! IT'S A FEATURE!!
lmao

>>17196477
It's 8:20pm here and I've been wearing muh Rolex since a year or so lmao

>pepsi
>coke
>rootbeer
>sprite
>batman
>batgirl
>batperson
>hulk
>kermit
>starbucks
>cermit
>smurf
>panda
>reverse panda

>>17196474
Rolex doesn't make their hands. And that's an entry level piece.

>>17196476

>day window reads Saturday instead of Shaturday

Missed opportunity

>>17196482
>Rolex doesn't make their hands

>>17196479
Even Invicta looks cleaner.

>>17196481
>rolexfags are cringe and have to compare everything to funko pops and superheroes
are you surprised?

Watches are so boring and uninteresting that people in these threads would rather act like retards than talk about watches.

>>17196482
If I were a Rolexfag I would tell you that this sounds like prime cope

>>17196497
Discuss

>>17196482
as if that’s some kind of retort. stop carrying water.

>>17196497
You're right.

>>17196479
If she's close enough to your watch to see that she's already sucking your dick

Brought my dad a ray 2
Did I fuck up? I usually gifted him some casio edifices, but they last 3-4 years max, if the orient lasts that much I will be happy

>>17196392
First one is so much better

What's even up with gridpaper shit?

>>17196542
I can see how poor the finish quality is from the thumbnail

New watch, what do you think?

>>17196565
7th grade/10

>>17196565
green globe is better

How come planet ocean gets no love?

>>17196595
Why would it get love?

Enjoying my NY0154-51L still.

>>17196603
Its better than the 300m

Why shouldn't I cop this for my first diver?

>>17196618
What's the price range on it?

>>17196619
$1100

>>17196624
Get the titanium Citizen premaster or the fugu instead.

Im doing an internship for a finance group and here's all the watches that the employees laugh at
>Rolex Milgauss
>Rolex Explorer
>Vintage Rolexes that aren't heirlooms or submariners
>Nonfunctional vintage Omegas
>Omega MoonSwatch

>>17196637
Based. Shit Rolex models aren't even worth bothering.

>>17196643
Fellow intern wearing the Invicta 1953 or whatever the fuck got no comments on the watch but a customer wearing an explorer got laughed at hard

>>17195748
Does she send pussy juice with the strap?

>>17196637
>and then everybody clapped

>>17196681
Triggered explorer/milgaus fan

>>17196637
What kind of a tier 3 peasant shop do you work for where people actively comment on watches?

>>17196682
>not enjoying the perfect Rolex

>>17196687
Almost as ugly as the Explorer, almost.

>>17196687
Rubber straps that fit to the sides of the watch case.
Please don't do this, it has never looked good on any watch.
Even the rolexs that come on rubber leave a gap

>>17196692
>>17196690
>omg you can't do that
cucks

>>17196687
>>17196695
Sexiest Rolex

>>17196692
;-)

>>17196698
>i got stuck with this pos after it was the only one the AD would offer me and now I live to cope
Shoulda saved up for a grey subby.

>>17196700
How can you be so wrong?

>>17196542
Make sure he gets some natos and a rubber strap. The bracelet WILL break the spring bars after ~ a year of wear.

>>17196700
Who shops the AD?

lol

What’s your opinion about the Axios Flagship

>>17196692

I’m a white straight male, I’ll do whatever I like. Lesser ‘humans’ (I use that word loosely) such as blacks, women, and gays will embrace it because I am better by far, and have far more value as the supreme being. When I say the Milgauss can have a gapless strap, you clap and cheer, accepting it fully. Full stop.

>>17196730
Have sex

>>17196730
whiteboi won't put his ugly milgauss on a metal strap because he know he'd get mugged lol

>>17196723
Holy shit. It's another "vintage inspired" $500 microbrand Chink shitter with a Miyota 9xxx movement. I can't believe what I'm seeing. It's fucking dogshit you idiot.

>>17196723
Kinda ugly but at least it's not a Milgauss or an Explorer.

>>17196034
We are

A true strap monster

>>17196739
Lol tell me where they touched you?

I just ordered a 34mm Longines because it looks vaguely like an Explorer dial Air King and I also like the pinstripes. How'd I do, am I big boy or based?

>>17196754
Doesn't have the ugly font the Explorer has so it's probably based.

>>17196497
I love watches but also cats so I’ll let this one slide for now

>>17196698
This is an example of a cool Rolex. Most of them all look really similar but this one stands out for sure. If I were to get one it might be this.

>>17196739
I'm pretty surprised that people keep falling for this meme over and over again. I think they have deluded themselves into thinking eventually a microbrand will release something comparable to a Rolex at a $500 price point. In fact, that's exactly what the Axios owner claims: he bought a sub and then thought he overpaid and felt he could do better, and this is the result. Powerful stuff.

Realistically the target market for these microbrand shit watches are not watch enthusiasts, the target market is clueless people.

>>17196754
Longines is a great brand and this is a cool watch. I was choosing between a longines and the tissot visodate and even though longines is a better brand I gotta go with the visodate. I’m obsessed with it.

Why is it never a fit person wearing a seamaster or a Rolex submariner?

>>17196773
Nigga you never watched James Bond?

What the FUCK is a ZULU

>>17196776
bond has dad bod

>>17196773
They do but they’re under 5”7 and/or bald

>>17196777
Retarded keepers

>be Daniel Craig
>paid by Omega to wear their watches in James Bond movies
>wear Rolex on his free time

>be Pierce Brosnan
>paid by Omega to wear their watches in James Bond movies
>wear Panerai on his free time

>>17196787
>>17196794
You do realize that it's the studio that's paid...right? Not the actor? It's called product placement.

>>17196797
Dunno about Craig but Brosnan was Omega's ambassador.

>>17196801
Just another business deal. Contract finished and he can wear what he wants.

>>17196787
why are you guys still seething that Omega got the Bond deal? it has been decades, let it go

>>17196794
He likes his watches the way he likes his women, with a large diameter

>>17196748
A monster indeed, it already ate the end of the strap at the 12:00 lug.

Reminder that modern vikings wear vintage Omegas.

>>17196734

I do with your girl, every night.

>>17196736
I pull my meat out to break bucks, as you well know. How that sore ass btw?

>>17196842
Omega should bring this watch back.

>>17196842
Modern vikings also wear sparkly dresses, it seems.

i dont like the swiss

>>17195668
>2019 = nazi
>2020 = snowflake
>2021 = incel
>2022 = ESL retard
many such cases...

>>17196864
ok nazi incel snowflake esl retard

>>17196864
Ah memories.
I'm posting from 2029. We call guys like that caterpillar numpties now.

>>17196754
You should have gotten the high accuracy quartz version desu

>>17196003
Classic wannabe rich poorfag with the Gucci slides

>>17196879
Those are actually fake gucci slides lol.

>>17196034
We 100% are

>grail finally came in
only cost me 5400 too

>>17196888

>Trips of Trump Truth

Glory to the God Emperor

>>17196888
WHAT A BARGAIN! Mogs every watch in that price range.

>>17196006
ref?
it's really nice anon

>the only time I've ever gotten complimented on my watch was at an MTG tourny
>my deck cost 3x as much as my $600 watch

>>17196902
This hobby is a meme

>>17196907
it's not a hobby

>>17196902
I've never gotten a compliment on my Rolex but have gotten plenty on my Nike sneakers LMAO

>>17196764
So its shit because it’s not a rolex? Gotcha.

>>17196542
If some relatively sturdy quartz watches last him 3-4 years (what the hell does he do with them to kill them so fast btw?) how could you think of getting him an automatic?

>>17196912
It's shit because it is a brand using the cheapest parts they can find out of Asia to cobble together watches and sell them at a 200% mark-up while peddling their naïve idea of affordable luxury. I'd be surprised if they actually made anything.

>>17196902
I only get compliments on my reverso everything else gets ignored.

Why won't these bastards at Tag make a non limited version of the 39mm Carrera? I'm not a Speedy guy and I'd pick this over a Zenith to get my chrono fix.

>>17196916
You just described rolex

>>17196927
Rolex is not peddling their watches as affordable luxury and are one of the most fully vertically integrated watch manufacturers around (along with JLC)

>>17196930
Im sure a rolex costs 3k to make right? They aren’t overpriced in the slightest

>>17196211
Nice. Post lume shot

>>17196935
If you're at least paying a LIVING wage.. they cost over $10k each. They're selling them to you at a loss.

STYOP SHITTALKING ROLEX PLEASEPLSEDDASPLERSPLEESA PLSLED

>>17196615
dimensions make it practically unwearable and this is coming from an Omega fan

>>17196935
Rolex might be the only brand that costs that much as a percentage of price
Omegas cost $500 to make
I wouldn't be surprised if entry level PP cost about $2,000 to make 3,000 for precious metal versions
Rolex has a ton of overhead by doing almost everything (their own foundry) themselves but it also means they aren't paying b2b markups on any components. Not sure how it works out price wise.

>>17196956
>>17196956
Having so many zealots and shills and they still sell at a loss. What a bunch of morons

>>17196971
jelly jelly hahaha jellyfish jelly hehehehehe jelly RETARD poor RETARD

>>17196595
The planet ocean fucking rules, i love that thing. The 39.5 mm one is easily omegas best dive watch

>>17195956
>>17195960
I have an automatic I bought in 2019 before they cucked it. Great watch. Honestly many features over the base bitch at the time.
Now. . .
GOD I need a sammitch sneed so bad SO FUCKING BAD

>>17196970
>Rolex
>Themselves
China

>>17196973
My god this place is worse than /pol/

>>17196970
the hands for rolexes under 10k are made in vietnam tho

>>17196970
handsets bro

>jelly jelly hahaha jellyfish jelly hehehehehe jelly RETARD poor RETARD

>>17196984
Refer to the chart and start SEETHING you're jealous. Rolex could sell at $300k and they would stil have LINES of LOYAL customers who want a piece of the crown on trheir fucking WRIST

>>17196991
ths, the market shows that Rolex is underpriced if anything at MSRP. Hail to the king baby

>>17196902
I've gotten compliments of my Bulova HA

>>17196991
Why would I be jelly of bunch of blind morons that act the same as moonswatch freaks?

>>17196754
Nice watch my dude. I was looking at the 39mm Hydroconquest pretty hard but I’m going Omega SM300 instead

>>17196993
no you havne't refer to the chart>>17196995
we're not blind morons we're rich and powerful and run the whole world only retards think otjherwise ande are poor and retarded and sutpid as fuck dumvest redtard on earth get the fuck out of my thread just get out talk about rolex or get out

>>17196997
>we're not blind morons we're rich and powerful and run the whole world only retards think otjherwise ande are poor and retarded and sutpid as fuck dumvest redtard on earth get the fuck out of my thread just get out talk about rolex or get out
Keep fighting the good fight king

>>17196985
>the hands for rolexes under 10k are made in vietnam tho
Where can i read about this?

>>17196996
>Omega SM300 instead
Get the planet ocean instead
At leas try one on, the 39.5mm one
You can get them cheap as hell too

>>17197007
rolex homagfe bullshit

>>17196997
Chill Nico, the cholesterol is gonna kill you

>>17197013
>>17197007
>tnam tho
>Where can i read about this?
>>>
> Anonymous 08/17/22(Wed)19:18:46 No.17197007▶>>17197009
>File: 1660781900290.jpg (138 KB, 1500x1001)
>>>17196996
>>Omega SM300 instead
>Get the planet ocean instead
>At leas try one on, the 39.5mm
fuck OFF please PLEASE just tlak about ROOOOLEX

>>17197009
??? Doesn't look like any rolex ive seen

>>17197021
literall,.y copied the rolex yachtmaster

>>17197007
digits check out

>>17197020
My god you got a stoke

>>17197029
lots of women stroke me because i have a rolex hahahahahahah

ROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLEX

>>17197007
Yeah I considered the 39.5
The pre ceramic black SMP with radium cut Bond wave dial just has better dimensions imo. Also more muted and not as flashy/glossy as the planet ocean. It is a fantastic watch and criminally underrated desu.

>>17197032
Lol I’m sure they do

>>17197037
holy rip off rolex BATMAN!

new thread
>>17197046>>17197046
>>17197046
>>17197046
>>17197046

>>17197039
(You)

Bump

>>17196560
I bet you can
>>17196706
Aight thanks, I have a few rubber single pass natos might give him one. Didnt vostok watches use tougher spring bars or smth?
>>17196915
He broke the spring bars on the last one and it fell from a 10m drop

>>17196898
SNE569p1

>>17196386
my watch isn't even in this list :^)

>>17196936
Only on the hands, doesn't have the lumibrite dial on titanium version

>>17196339
Bellmatics are cool.

>>17196880
i’ll take a lot of shit online and there’s literally another thread up but my slides are real dog i don’t buy fake stuff lol

>>17196687
Not a fan of this style case myself but the dial is cool and that seconds hand rules. I hate the rubber strap. This might look great with a black leather strap

>>17197049
what model is this?

The need of validation and general insecurity in this threads is beyond ridiculous lol

>>17196618
>pvd coating
At least get the blue and white one or any other color.

>>17197819
Ahhh the seiko pelagos

thoughts? just got it
it's a tag heuer formula 1 quartz chronograph 43mm
https://www.tagheuer.com/us/en/timepieces/collections/tag-heuer-formula-1/43-mm-quartz/CAZ1011.BA0842.html