/fa/ - Fashion

Grand Seiko

>Grand Seiko

>>17183759
Speaking of weeb watches, I kinda like Kuoe

Seiko, Grand

Kurono

>>17183759
Seiko > Grand Seiko

Why do people buy quartz Grand Seiko when you can get HAQs from regular Seiko for like 200 bucks on Ebay? Looks the same as zandatsu polishing or whatever it's called.

Can anyone rec me things like the seiko ripley? industrial, forward thinking, quartz or auto.

>>17183782
Anyyone who is spending more than 100 dollars for a quartz watch is kidding themselves. Unless that quartz is rated for ultra precision, has eco-drive or has sweeping seconds, it's a scam. A Casio under 100 is all you will ever need for a quartz watch.

>>17183772
That is very cute.

>>17183782
I don't like day date
Finishing isn't as good

WAYWT bros? For me, it's my 1970's Tissot Seastar PRX-predecessor that I recently serviced. It's pretty beat and has suffered some water damage to the dial, but it's now running strongly and has some NOS parts in it. Pretty happy with how it turned out now everything works as it should.

>>17183795
That's awesome. Way cooler than a regular PRX even if its age is showing.

I'm wearing a random chink diver I forgot I had and I'm too lazy to take a photo. It's surprisingly comfortable.

>>17183759
based

>>17183788
correct. Every worthwhile over 100 quartz has radio, solar, HAQ or maybe it's some vintage calculator or something funky.

Teddy looks like a manlet for some reason, at least he has a jawline sort of.

>>17183805
It doesn't need radio if it's a haq
Signifies incompetence

>>17183807
That nose...

>>17183797
>That's awesome. Way cooler than a regular PRX even if its age is showing.
Thanks Anon, it has (what I think is) a really cool in-house Tissot 2031 movement with an unusual compression setting where you hold the crown in to set the time. I fixed another Tissot from the same era with the earlier version of this movement (the 2030) inside of it, and they're incredibly fun to work on as well. I own a 35mm ice blue PRX as well, and I'm honestly amazed how close they got it to the original one from the 70's. I might dump some pre and post-service pictures of the movement in a bit if anyone gives a shit.
>I'm wearing a random chink diver I forgot I had and I'm too lazy to take a photo. It's surprisingly comfortable.
Chinkshit watches are always solid in my experience, I own a Baltany myself and I really like it. Should post pics if you can muster up enough fucks to take one. What is it? Just a sterile one, or from one of the AliExpress brands?

>>17183795
Alpinist daily gang

>>17183811
Kinda want a new one
Kinda want to take off the seconds hand

>>17183808
>blocks your path

>>17183808
>>17183805
yeah "or". It could have radio OR solar OR HAQ OR be some weird vintage thing to justify being over $100

>>17183831
https://youtube.com/watch?v=2atr-SKjM8E
>>17183835
Solar limits dial design which is a compromise

>>17183837
If solar limits design, what's Rolex's excuse for making the same shite for 50 years?

>>17183783
seconding, love the Alien-future aesthetic.

last time i set my Rolex Submariner Date™?
daylight savings, nearly HALF A YEAR ago.
the current accuracy?
LITERALLY within less than 1 second.

>>17183849
Congratulations on your pregnancy

>>17183814
Go to the gym you faggot

>>17183816
>Kinda want a new one
Honestly, the PRX was the first brand new watch I've ever bought after 10 years of collecting watches, and I love it. My only real gripe is the butterfly clasp. In cooler temperatures it can fit too loose, but if it's hot like it has been today, it's too tight. Why the fuck they didn't just put a normal folding clasp on it is beyond me. I can add or remove links quickly enough, but lack of real microadjustment is completely retarded in [current year]. I live in the UK where it's cold most of the time though, so once summer is out I should be fine.
>Kinda want to take off the seconds hand
Unless you know what you're doing, I'd strongly recommend you don't try and remove the seconds hand yourself, and even if you can, I wouldn't bother anyway. Mine aligns incredibly well, but even if it didn't I wouldn't really care all that much anyway, the exposed seconds hand pinion with no hand on it would irritate the fucking life out of me though. Here's some related gore: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irORaww8bc8

TL;DR - If you like the look of the PRX, buy one. The 35mm fits most wrists perfectly, but the 40mm only works on larger wrists due to the extended l2l with the bracelet endlinks being fixed in place.
>>17183814
My friend has an owl penis, it's a super nice watch but a little big for my wrist. If it fit me though, I'd have seriously considered buying one years ago.

>>17183845
>what's Rolex's excuse
Rolex doesn't need an excuse.

>STILL can't catch up with Patek.

Why does this brand even exist?

>>17183856
What a klutz
Is it pin or screws on the links?
Do they have half links, or like full ones?
It looks nice on you

>>17183856
i really do like the look of the PRX.
is the movement alright?

>>17183849
Complete bullshit

Pic of the Tissot 2030 I serviced a little while ago to keep the thread bumped.
>>17183871
>What a klutz
It killed me inside watching that video the first time, lol. In fairness to the bloke, those chinkshit watchknives are fucking awful. I just use a normal folding knife as it works better.
>Is it pin or screws on the links?
Push-pins.
>Do they have half links, or like full ones?
Two half links, a shit load of full links. You can get a perfect size, but as with all butterfly clasps, weather will make it fit either too tight or too loose on occasion. If you live somewhere hotter, you can probably size it a little better.
>It looks nice on you
T-thanks.. Y-you too..!
>>17183872
>is the movement alright?
The 35mm one contains an ETA F05.115, which is incredibly accurate, but also quartz if that's something that bothers you. For the price bracket, the movement is fine if you like the design enough to buy one.

£25 from the market. Can't find any info on it really, nice though

>>17183902
Did you service it yourself or you had it serviced? If you did it yourself, you have any recs of what I can read to be able to service a quartz watch myself?

>>17183907
Seen these sell on eBay for anywhere between 50 - 100 quid, nice find man. Which markets are you going to? Nowhere near me ever has anything half decent and the charity shops are all shit these days.

>>17183853
I should more but if you’re implying I have thin wrists you are mistaken. Simply an odd angle and I cropped the photo.

>>17183913
>Did you service it yourself or you had it serviced?
Serviced it myself, here's a pic from before I did it. I think I still have the progress pics saved too if you want me to share them, I posted them a few threads back. The battery corrosion ran entirely through the watch which is what prompted me to service it as opposed to just giving it a light clean up.
>you have any recs of what I can read to be able to service a quartz watch myself?
The 2030 and 2031 movements in my two Seastars aren't very well documented online honestly, so I had to kinda wing it - I don't really use guides whenever I mess about with these things anyway though, it's largely trial and error. The best recommendation I can give you if you want to get started fucking around with things like this is take A LOT of photos of every step of the process while disassembling something. If you think you're taking too many, you aren't. You should also buy some cheap pill-trays or something else with little compartments in it, and make sure you sort all of your parts and screws appropriately when disassembling things. It makes the process so much easier when it comes to putting everything back together.

If you're completely new to this and don't want to invest a lot of money in it, buy some cheap damaged Seiko SQ's from the 90's and have a crack at taking them to bits and reassembling them. You don't need expensive screwdrivers, tweezers, cleaning equipment or any of the other bullshit people seem to think you do. Grab yourself some of Changs finest presto hand removal tools, a set of antimagnetic tweezers, some lighter fuel, a set of screwdrivers, and a case holder. If you want some cheap tools recommendations, I'll grab you some eBay links for stuff that literally costs under 10 USD a pop.

Fair warning too, your first watch is almost always a sacrifice in learning. Buy something you don't care too much about when you get started so you don't feel as bad if you fuck it up. Hope this helps.

I want to relume this thing. How likely am I to fuck it up if I do it myself. I want to make this thing viable dive watch like it was designed to be. Tomorrow I'm dropping it off at my watchmaker's to have it pressure tested and to have the gaskets replaced since they're about 30 years old assuming they're the original ones

>>17183882
kind of a boring case back, but I like that he's doing an alternative escapement, and the design from the front is quite contrarian in a good way

>>17183941
Are you retarded? Why would you try and do that after you get it pressure tested? Why would you not ask the watchmaker to re-lume it?

>>17183941
>I want to relume this thing. How likely am I to fuck it up if I do it myself.
Buy a joblot of random shitters and practice. Reluming dials is notoriously difficult, but good luck if you attempt it Anon.

>>17183935
Thanks for the tips. What I do in live in part is like watch repair just on a larger scale. Troubleshooting, part replacement, disassembly and reassembly. I already have myself some cheap tools, I like the pill tray idea. I bought a lot of casios a while ago, am finally getting around to doing things with them (pic related).
Some of them work perfectly, see >>17183941
Some of the ones I really like just don't tick after getting a new battery. Luckily I have a few that I really don't give a shit about so they're gonna be the first experiments. Problem is I atleast have manuals when I do what I do and can atleast reference them, I have no idea what to troubleshoot in a watch apart from the motor and checking the gears.

>>17183952
Blue dials are always classy and attractive, even a 40 dollar watch looks luxury with a blue dial.

>>17183867
Why does pic look like an Aliexpress watch?

>>17183867
Is it too much for me to ask for perfectly uniform stitching on a $20k watch? If I want a suit commissioned for $2,000 I could reasonably get perfection, I could ask the tailor to do the job properly and he would do it. Why do luxury watches get a pass for shit quality stitching?

>>17183960
>Paying 20k for any watch.
That's the first mistake right there.

>>17183951
I just want to be able to bring it into the pool or shower finally, I'm unlikely to relume it anytime soon. Also feels weird to spend $100 on a lume job for a watch I paid $10 for, even if I do like it.
>>17183953
I figured as much, this one also has little details that I'm near certain I'll fuck up
Maybe I will end up paying to have it done by a pro.

>>17183902
no dude either mechanical movement or nothing at all

>>17183959
Because cheap watches try to look like expensive watches.

>>17183964
No I mean it doesn't make sense to get the watch pressure tested and gaskets replaced only to take it all apart in a week or whatever to try and re-lume it. Unless you really know what you're doing the odds are good you'll fuck something up.

>>17183899
i swear to baby jesus, i have not set my submariner sind daylight savings, and it is accurate to the very second.
i check it nowadays every three or four days or something (i work with a satellite clock in front of me so its not that hard) and if it starts to get a second fast i wear it a night or two, so its spot on again.

i did not adjust it via the crown sinve daylight savings.

>>17183965
Pleb take. If seiko never made quartz widely available you'd be creaming your pants right now over exclusive quartz swiss movements instead of mechanical movements.

>>17183973
no, i piss on quartz

>>17183969
>No I mean it doesn't make sense to get the watch pressure tested and gaskets replaced only to take it all apart in a week
>only to take it all apart in a week
What part of ''not going to relume it anytime soon'' is hard for you to understand?

>>17183977
Because you're a pleb.

>>17183980
guess i'm a pleb then.

>>17183979
Because it makes no fucking sense. You're going to waste time and money pressure testing a $10 Casio, only to ruin the watch by trying to re-lume it down the line...and negate the pressure testing and gasket replacements you just paid for.

Do poorfags really?

>>17183984
Because I want to be able to bring it into the shower and pool, which is more important to me than making sure the watch glows in the dark. What do I care if I have to spend $15 on it again to get gaskets changed and pressure tested in over 6 months? Are you really this dense?

>>17183807
He’s actually tall but yeah something about him seems really boyish, like he’s some 15 year old kid.

>>17183990
So you're willing to try and re-lume it yourself (which you don't know how to do) because you're too cheap to pay for it, but you're willing to have the gaskets changed and pressure tested twice because you lack foresight. No wonder you're wearing a Casio.

>>17183991
It's his face

>>17183995
Are you being intentionally obtuse right now? Are you trolling me? Or are you actually this stupid?

>>17184001
Nice argument. Just toss it in the trash where it belongs and save yourself the $30, something tells me you need it.

>>17183956
The main issue you could run into is some of these movements may not be serviceable (lots of quartz movements are plastic-riveted). That said, you could always just movement swap stuff if you like it enough, just make sure that you find a suitable replacement as dial feet and hand sizes vary a lot from movement to movement.
>Problem is I atleast have manuals when I do what I do and can atleast reference them, I have no idea what to troubleshoot in a watch apart from the motor and checking the gears.
Again, this varies a lot from movement to movement - If it's a relatively common one, you can probably Google the reference followed by troubleshooting steps. Loads of watch forums with servicing guides are readily available online if you just Google it. My first port of call with quartz watches though is checking for any signs of corrosion as in 99/100 cases it's a battery leak that someone has tried to clean up and hasn't realised that it's ate up all the traces out of view (see pic related).

Given your background in something similar to watch repair, I'm sure you'll get the hang of it with some practice Anon. Good luck on your attempts to fix your stuff. It's always nice seeing people have a crack at stuff like this. Should post in /wt/ when you make a start on it.

>>17183755
>Sport Auto edition
He couldn't afford the grand sport lol

>>17184003
What argument do you want me to make against your inane statements? You're clearly ignoring what I'm telling you, why bothering typing out what I have to say if you're not reading it. I'm done replying to your dumb ass.

>>17184012
Fleeing when faced with your own financial idiocy. Typical poorfag mentality. Best of luck with the Casio!

When is Credor going to make a new manual wind movement out of the recent 9RA spring drive developments?

>>17184015
How poor are you that you worry about spending an extra $15?

>>17184023
I'm not, you're the one who is too cheap to pay for a decent lume job but too stupid to realize you're paying 30% of one by getting it pressure tested twice. Thought you were done replying to me poorfag? Upset when faced with your own stupidity?

I will NEVER buy a watch from Swatch or Richemont Groups. I only care about fully independent brands with in-house movement.

>>17183783
Search Seiko Giugiaro on chrono 24 and ebay, that should be a start
Then see if that guy collaborated with other watchmakers

>>17183837
virtually every feature limits design in some way so who gives a shit?

>>17183960
Because the bands are made in Chinese sweatshops

>>17184034
I don't enjoy the solar panel aesthetic

>>17184024
That wasn't me but since you're so interested, I don't mind spending 150% or even 300% of the price of the watch for something that will give me the peace of mind that I won't ruin the watch if I forget to take it off when washing my hands or showering, I do mine spending 1000% of the price I paid for the watch just so I can go ''ooooh it glows in the dark'', plus I want to learn to do it myself, I like crafty hobbies. I might even change the gaskets myself and just have it pressure checked, which won't actually save me any money since a 2 gasket change for a regular watch is in the price of the pressure test at my watchmakers. I can't believe I have to explain this to you.

>>17184037
>I don't mind spending 150% or even 300% of the price of the watch for something
Yeah, that makes you an idiot. No wonder you're poor.

>>17183990
why don't you just NOT bring it in the shower and pool and wear a different $10-40 watch for those things?

>>17184032
based

>>17183811
How does the new 35 sit on your wrist? bretty close to pulling the trigger on the icy one

Yo seiko did an alba version of the Ripley chronograph
K2000 V657-6090

>>17184040
Thanks for confirming you're a troll
>>17184041
>incase I forget
I like it a lot and wear it a lot these days.

This has to be answered:
Is this brand a cope or not?

>>17184041
Too complicated for the poorfag mind. The fact that he figures out how to put it on his wrist at all is noteworthy.

>>17184047
Don't be mentally ill and stop thinking of things as cope. Real life isn't internet memes.

>>17184047
Of course it's cope. It was built from the ground up as Rolex cope.
>>17184049
Cope. Can't afford a Rolex huh? Chin up, I'm sure the prices will relax in two more weeks.

>>17184050
What's it like being mentally ill?

>>17184059
What's it like not being able to afford a Rolex?

>>17184049
chill bruv i own a Tudor and want to buy a next one soon
>>17184050
i only buy from ADs and I find their Rolex sells politics retarded

>>17184060
You tell me.

>>17184047

It’s close but coping is based

>>17184065
>n-no YOU CAN'T AFFORD A ROLEX!
Powerful.

>>17184047
In real life literally no one gives a shit
On the internet it's the fucking king of cope brands

>>17184018
I'd take a complete guess the Eichi III will come out with something based off the omiwatari's 9R31 or 9R16 probably 2023, maybe this year.

Features:
>manual
>72 hour+ power reserve
>+-10 seconds a month or better
>under 10 mm thick
>smaller, under 38mm maybe 35, 36 mm.

>>17184068
You're one to talk.

>>17184071
but I can afford a Rolex. You can't.

>>17184046
>forgets to remove watch while removing shirt
ok

>>17184072
Lol sure you can.

Does the watch look best when its looser and hangs as low on you wrist as possible or when its tighter and above your wrist bone?

>>17184081
That depends. Is it a Rolex? You can wear it on your ankle and it will still be the best. Is it anything else? It will always be shit.

>>17184081
the farther down your hand you wear it, the darker your skin probably is

>>17184081
Naturally it falls behind the wrist bone like an inch from my wrist and it looks ok. For aesthetics if I'm taking a picture it looks better right in front of the wrist bone next to my wrist. I wear it loose enough that I can slide it around but not loose enough that it slides on its own.

Cope, if you must, and you will.

>>17183755
I wear an invicta sub mariner and there’s nothing you stupid cunts can do to stop me.

>>17184081
tighter and above your wrist bone

If you dress like punk today you are going to look like a male feminist that kiss nigger feet in public

>>17184118
Wrong thread bitch punk gear looks fucking great if your sexy so it’s not a concern to people who know what their doing mate. Overtly wearing piercings and coloring your hair green with a meth head vibe is ugly as can be but who the fuck is self aware and does that?

>>17184118
What does this have to do with watches you retarded faggot

>>17184043
See >>17183856

>>17184047
It's cope if you don't already have a Rolex. Blackbay is an essential for any enthusiast or collector. Their cheaper offerings like the 1926 might be good for students or young professionals, but its cringe if you're wearing one in your thirties.

>>17184118
Based and wrong thread pilled

>>17184132
>Blackbay is an essential for any enthusiast or collector.
hehe...hohoho...HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA

>>17184033
Yeah the seiko Giugiaro stuff is pretty good. I’ve also been looking at the Bulova computron d cave.
If I find anything else I’ll post it

>>17184105
>invicta sub mariner
No such beast. Pro Diver

>>17184069
Anything that is not Rolex or Omega in the luxury watches category is unknown for Normies. 90% of them have never heard of Plaget or Patek even.

I will NEVER buy a watch from the Swatch Group
I will NEVER buy a watch from the Richemont Group
I will NEVER buy a watch from Rolex SA
I will NEVER buy a watch from Patek or AP
I will NEVER touch a pussy I was born by C-section
I'm only interested in watches made by the japanese

>>17184060
post your rolex faggot

>>17184134
I don't know why it's funny that you can't afford a Rolex and Tudor. Are you laughing at how poor you are?

>>17184044
It's ugly, unlike the Seiko Giugiaro, which is based.

>>17184143
Look basically I'm just not gonna buy Tudor

I'm sorry!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I know....UGH I know...

It's just that I'm not buying that shit is all

AHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>17184140
The only Japanese brand that has my respect is Casio. Everything else is filler.

>>17184143
>I don't know why it's funny that you can't afford a Rolex and Tudor. Are you laughing at how poor you are?

>>17184032
Post your independent.
>inb4 shitty microbrands

>>17184151
Microbrands as in Aliexpress dropshipped brands, kek

>>17184140
Like Spitz

>>17184154
More like Shitz, no one wants that garbage.

>>17184151

>>17184155
Then you clearly don't know watches

>>17184156
Nice rep, which seller on Taobao?

>>17184159
cope

>>17184073
Yes and? Part of that is the habit of being able to shower with my other watches

>>17184156
>>17184159
If it looks like a real rolex, has high quality components, and even Rolex repair stores are thrown off by it. Who can even tell? The rep might as well be the real thing at that point.

>>17184132
Any Tudor is cringe because it's a massive cope

>>17184167
I know you retards are just here for the shitposting but that's a meme created by Youtubers to get some views.
On pictures sure, it's sometimes hard to tell the difference.
In real life however a fake can be recognized very easily, even the most expensive ones.

>>17184032
same here
is there a cheaper way of byuing a completely in-house, independent watch than buying a Rolex? honest question

>>17184178
Oris is independent and makes their own movement.
People here hate the brand for some reasons but I really like the Big Crown Pointer Date.

>>17184178
Nomos, Grand Seiko, Yema...there are lots of them around but frankly you're retarded and don't understand the way the industry works if
>muh in-house movement
is a major selling point. It's an absurd marketing gimmick that has taken most watch enthusiasts hook line and sinker. I would literally pay extra money to not be stuck with an in-house Yema movement.

>>17184183
I really like this one, sad they stopped making it. I like maximalist watches

>>17184183
Oris used to be pretty good. About Tag huehue equivalent both with quality and pricing, but someone over at Oris has decided they need to push up-market and frankly they're deluded thinking they can charge Omega/Tudor/GS prices. Just don't spend more than $2k or so and they're fine.

>>17184186
>It's an absurd marketing gimmick that has taken most watch enthusiasts hook line and sinker.
It really depends on the price point of the brand. IWC selling 6k watches with ETA movements is as absurd as a 1k Yema with in-house movement.

>>17184156
>Doesn't even dare to change the color of a bezel withou having to consult with their investors board.
>Independent
TOP KEK, numbnuts.

>>17184176
How? I can never tell from pictures.

>>17184087
wrong
>>17184081

>>17184190
I'd rather pay more for a hand made watch than some mass produced "luxury" watch.

>>17183952
something similar for green dials?
I looked at the traska explorer homage some anon posted before, liked the sage green, but I dislike the new case. It would be better with 18 or 19mm lug width. At 20, with a small case, it looks like a maxipad. Also, traska might (will) still have shit QC, and fuck them for bending the knee for muh 36mm cope watch. commit to 38 if you thought it was a good watch on its own, not just aping something else.
Anyway.. so, green dials?

>>17184209
Ok? I don't know how that has anything to do with my post.

>>17184209
All watches are mass produced unless you're buying it from an artisan.

>>17184214
Yes

>>17184214
>All watches are mass produced unless you're buying it from an artisan.
Whoa...no way!

>>17183915
Got it from the York market. Decent little watch stall there. But aye charity shops never have anything

>>17184190
Oris has become better than anything currently being sold by Tag Huehue. Their Propilot X line is based at that price rage.

>>17184200
Pic related. Fake on the left, genuine on the right.
For reference, this is a $500 fake from one of the best chinese factory. It's considered a premium replica (this is a basic 3 hands with no complications, when you hear about $1500 replicas people are talking about fake Daytona).

>crown on the clasp
Genuines are sharp and clean.
Fakes are just gross.
>hands and indices
Genuines use white gold which has a specific shine. Hands have a slight curve.
Fakes are made of steel and are completely flat.

These are the most obvious clues. There are others : engraving on the rehaut, crown, proportions... But the best giveaway is the overall feel. A genuine Rolex feels rock solid, while a fake will always feel like a chinese cheap shitter (because that's what they are).
If you have any doubt, just unscrew the crown and wind it. If the crown moves, it's fake. If it makes a disgusting sound, it's fake.
And despite all that, if you still have any doubt (you'd have to be a retard at this point), just test the accuracy of the watch. Rolex will be -2/+2s per day. A fake (even one with a supposedly 1:1 movement) will be AT BEST -10/+30s.

The "watch experts can't distinguish a real Rolex from a fake" meme needs to die. Anyone who has handled a real Rolex in his life can spot a fake in less than 5 seconds.

>>17184240
In-house movement

>>17184240
Looks like complete shit mate, especially for $4300.

>>17184250
Post YOUR watch, then.
>inb4 shitter

>>17184240
The movement in these is really impressive.
>-3/+5s per day
>120 hours PR
>10 years warranty
Too bad for the futuristic weird design.

>>17184247
extremely based post

>LUXURY

>>17184240
>$4300
Are these guys for real?

>>17184263
But bro its heckin swiss! Its made by Swiss midgets in Europe! IT'S LUXURRRRY

>>17184255
Not him but I wear a samsung watch. Watches are truly obsolete at this point other than just for collecting and special occasions.

>>17184240
Looks even shittier than Invicta. You truly have garbage taste Charttard

>>17184256
>Too bad for the futuristic weird design.
I haven't seen it before, but I'm actually liking it. Looks cool.

>>17184274
>Charttard

>>17184275
I agree. It’s my favorite Oris. But I would still never buy one. You can get a Seamaster for that price.

>>17184283
Why not get both?

>>17184211
>something similar for green dials?
Formex essence 39

>>17184211
Stock hailos untill they finally make.some more fucking watches and then buy one from their website in the 30 seconds before they sell out

>>17184255
This fad of low tier brands showing off their unfinished movements with sapphire casebacks is revolting.

>>17184140
I hate the Japanese but everything they make is superior.

>>17184140
based and subaru/seiko pilled

>>17184240
>>17184249
Even the clasp is fucking cool.

>>17184295
Sadly the average buyer wants to see the movement for some reasons.

>>17184150
>>17184279
>>17184240
>>17184060
>>17184050
>>17184032
>>17184104
>>17183760
samefag

>>17184298
>>17184299
Samefagging this gay

>>17184300
lmao the clasp really is pretty fucking cool
the watch itself - idk man i think a "pilot" watch should have a pilot complication (gmt hand for instance)
its not piloty enough for me

>>17184300
Garbage.

this

>>17184304
Ywn own a rolex.
YWN own a yacht.
YWN be married.
KYS

>>17184302
You retarded?

>>17184302
>samefag
Yes, and? What are you gonna do about it poorfag?

>>17184302
uh-huh

>>17184312
Cope.

>>17184310
Give it back, Tyrone

>>17184310

>>17184316
Nice html edit

>Oris

>>17184316
Retard

>>17184304
Don't reply to me or my son ever again.

>>17184285
I only have one wrist.

>>17184322
Sure, anon.

>>17184323
Cool selfie

What do we think of the new tonneau watch from lorier?

>>17184326
samefag html edit,

>>17183952
>Steel Blue Sports
Epitome of pleb.

>>17184298
I'm a rolexfag and I'm going to kill myself because of Grand Seiko

All black ceramic watch. What’s not to like?

Looks like the gland s o y k o shill is back.

>>17184385
I think it’s pretty good. You get a Tudor movement without the cucked Tudor branding and design failings.

>>17184385
Looks like it melted a little on the top there.

don't mind me, just winding my watch

>>17184385
What a piece of garbage.
Look at that bracelet. It's revolting.

>>17183772
What is the OG watch with this type of bezel? Patek?

>>17184105
>7 invicta logo/emblem/name

>>17184416
Breguet did edges, Oris and hanhart are the only other ones I know

>>17183783
Lip chronograph

>>17184425
Translate?

>>17184389
thancs bro I'll steer cleer

Why doesn't Rolex make watches like this anymore?

>>17184414
unironically better than any LOLEX

>>17184499
The current Cellini still has some of the same DNA. Honestly I think they shy away from complications because it's not worth the effort for them. It's a manufacturing nightmare.

>>17184499
Looks like it should be placed on a doily.

>>17184499
LOLEX realized they could put the minimum amount possible and still sell out. They'll start putting ETA movements in LOLEX mainline models soon.

post watches that you want.

>>17184527

>>17184529
Superb, better than any Rolex for sure.

>>17184527
>Seiko SNE573
>DOXA Sub 300 Professional
>CWC G10
>Sinn U50
>Citizen Aqualand JP2007

>>17184533
See
>>17184389

>>17184529
seiko by ronald mcdonald

>>17184527

>>17184539
All I see is a seething larper with no yacht.

>>17184529
Red looks dogshit on all watches, regardless of brand

>>17184551

I’m trying hard to get Andrew rate to notice me what watch should I wear that he would approve of and take notice of me?

>>17184562
have you gotten a verbal confirmation for a lolex yet?

>>17184527
dont actually think I want a two tone anymore, but I do want one of these fugu divers.

>>17184561
Show us your $200 Seiko so we can all have a good laugh

>>17183763
cheers for the introduction, looking at these now

>>17183763
>kyoto
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMgkt9jdjTU

me? I wear a dw6900 at the office

>>17184575
>1
Bad choice refer to the chart hehehehehahahahohohohoho8

>>17184345
i'm digging it, but at 31mm it's too dinky for my HUEG hamhocks

>i have a car engine on my wrist

>>17184415
some people just don't appreciate pottery

>>17184593
LOLEX fags dont appreciate anything except price tag and how many rappers wear it

>>17184558

>>17184544
au contraire, mon cher; c'est un omega aqua terra a la squeenix

>>17184596
That ceramic watch looks like fucking shit though

Baller alert.

>>17184588
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUwwevzNnIM

>>17184596
IKR

>>17184606
Impressive, but perhaps the biggest "mug me" sign you could wear on your wrist.

>>17184611
Not really. It looks like something you can buy for $15 off aliexpress.

>>17184612
Richards that look like this basically get stolen by people as soon as celebrities are alone. Just like the soccer player lol.

>>17184615
You think a thief is going to know what that one specific limited run watch actually is? They look for Rolex, Omega, and shit that is common knowledge. Normie sees that and thinks toy.

>>17184612
You only say this because those watches rip off the expensive watches.

>>17184619
>no brand name visible
>looks plastic-y at a glance
>ridiculous design
>instantly stolen by someone

>>17184619
Normies aren't the ones stealing watches retard.

Richard Mille watches are fucking disgusting and anyone who owns one deserves to have it stolen

>>17184633
they're more interesting, more expensive and more prestigious than Rolex. COPE

>>17184633
Angry poorfag

>>17184633
THE best chart says its above LOLex, Omega, Grand Seiko. If you hate it then well.. you're poor!

>>17184633
At least it's something fucking different and not just the same old Rolex everyone's dad has like they've been making for 70 years

$450 for this big ass quartz chrono, and it doesn't use that faggots seiko movement with the 24hr subdial.
At least vaguely interesting

>>17184650

>>17184648
>At least it's something fucking different and not just the same old crocs everyone's dad has like they've been making for 70 years

>>17184652
Yes.. THE best chart says Richard is high and above Rolex. Refer to it.

>>17184652
Thanks for posting more evidence to back up my statement

>>17184652
>rolexfag seething over being below Richard in the chart
oh no no no no

Looks like someone is mad he couldnt get a Rolex from his local AD

>>17184666
Looks like someone is mad Rolex is below Richard on the chart.

>>17184669
I think you're missing the point of Rolex, anon.
People like Rolex because the brand sits in the "expensive but still affordable" category.
Only a 12 years old would believe Rolex is the most expensive watch brand on earth.

>>17184691
I think you're missing the point of the chart.
Only a 2 year old could look at it and say Rolex is higher than Richard, because it's not. It's not prestigious or a luxury compared to Richard.

>>17184568
honestly better than the trash you posted

>>17184302
nope, but keep seething LOL

>>17184693
this. people giggle and laugh at rolex knowing its a cope watch for patek and richard. just like how aeronca champ 7ac is a cope for gulfstream 3.

>>17184690
i like it

>>17184693
I'm going to help you and give you new shitposting material anon, because frankly this is kind of sad.
See the other brands in the "high end luxury" category? Pretty much all of them are more expensive than Rolex on average. Even Hublot or IWC, which are in the lower category, are more expensive than Rolex.

>mfw cope
>mfw seethe hjata

>>17184706
Yep. It's just like not owning a private jet and using one of those "private jet uber" apps. You didn't "fly private". You don't own that jet. You don't know the pilot. You're coping you're rich. Just like pathetic little Rolextards who shit on Richard.

>>17184709
>Still below Richard.
Refer to the chart. Richard is a real luxury product. You're not living a luxury life being a desk diver 9-5 in Seattle.

Really want a Pepsi GMT but I’m not gonna drop whatever the market is asking for the Rolex version, so which one is the best cope model?

I’m leaning obviously towards the Tudor, but which one do you guys recommend? You can shitpost all you want about cope but as long as you can make a recommendation I don’t care, I am well aware of the coping.

>>17184716
chink homage bruv

>>17184711
funny you mention that the pepe posting anon was posting about he couldn't get a jet app set up LOL

>>17184715
So which Rolex your AD refused to sell you?

>>17184720
None however, I got the verbal confirmation my foot is in the door.

>>17184720
holy esl batman!

>>17184721
Which Rolex do you truly desire? The one you'd buy if you had the money or if it was available?
>inb4 "I-I prefer Omega"
You're anonymous here. No point in lying.

>>17184729
Sorry bro, refer to the chart.
Richard>Rolex>Omega. Simple as.

>the esl coping retard is already awake
Watch out everybody. He's gonna call everyone with an opinion an esl.

>>17184716
As a true GMT, the Tudor is probably the best option. It's thick as fuck though.
There's also this Longines that I like. Also true GMT. It's 42mm though.
Grand Seiko also has a true GMT. Don't remember the name though.

>Pac man game watch by nelsonic

>>17184716
Just get the black bay pro

Remember the moonswatch? Cringiest shit on earth

>>17184741
Copped enough to flip and get the real thing. I thought about keeping one but I rather wear an Apple Watch.

>>17184742
Moonswatches are so bad the Chinese copies are considered higher quality. You dodged a bullet and got some cash out of it. Grats.

>>17184716

NEW THREAD WHEN?

>>17183755
Watchlet here, anyone have advice on pocket watches, I think they look neat but don't want a shitty one

>>17184749
Make one, faggot

>>17184716
Formex reef gmt
https://formexwatch.com/watches/reef-gmt-42mm-automatic-cosc-300m/

>>17184752
Pocket watches are for older people, you’ll look autistic with one no matter which one you get.

The only thing stopping me from buying thid right now is the fact that the baltic hms is 1/6th of the price. Is it worth it?

>>17184752
They are almost all shit if you are looking at modern ones.

New Jody just dropped

>>17184757
If the one you truly want is the longines then just get that. Otherwise you'll have spent a few hundred bucks on a watch that's just going to remind you of the longines.

Wheels up, poorfags

>>17184770
It’s on the wrong arm, male hooker.

>>17184499
because chinks and arabs dont want watches like this

>>17184295
>low tier brands showing off their unfinished movements with sapphire casebacks
just say Tudor..

>>17184770
fat arms

New thread:
>>17184839
>>17184839
>>17184839

>>17184770
I want some tissot socks. Or breitling

>>17184239
Holy shit, you mean the one that is half inside a little building thing? Has a glass cabinet full of vintage watches near the door? If that is the one you mean, my wife bought pic related from there when we were last in York.

>>17185294
That's the one! Small world. Nice little vintage piece that

>>17184385
Matte finish looks better.

where can i order a real Vostok? found one I like on sovietwatchstore.com, unsure whether its safe to order from it

>>17185964
meranom or meramon smth like that

>>17186259
i looked there but didnt find the same picrel watch

>>17186356
well no shit, that's vintage