/fa/ - Fashion

>>17155799
Any good watches with no calendar, clear face, and with 15 minute increments? Wind up if possible. I've only ever owned digital watches and I'd like something slim and hardy.

>>17155813
>15 minute increments?
Serious question, why do you want this? Do you have a hard time remembering that 3=15, 6=30, 9=45, 12=60?

>pink
fags only watch then...? could a man who doesn't suck diseased shit off dicks get away with wearing this?

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/255635231509

>>17155801
This can be applied to anything, and the chuds here eat it up

Out of my way, beta males.

>>17155820

It's a very nice module, feels better quality than the regular 6900. I think they were aiming at the surfer crowd with those aesthetics

>>17155831
What's the difference in module? Not that anon ,but I'd wear the shit out of that

>>17155801
What they don't tell you is that they also replaced the bracelet screws with cheap pins and moved from Genta's original monobloc design with the caseback fully integrated into the case with the bezel attached on top to an easier to manufacture case design that would allow them to attach the caseback separately to save a couple bucks on each watch.

But the average Patek buyer neither knows nor cares about these flagrant downgrades, only that the watch says Patek-Philippe on the dial.

>>17155830
You collected all the medallions.... You are the Hero of Time...

>>17155820
It’s not the pink as much as it kind of looks like animal print at first glance. They have a glitch type look line out that is similar without the splatter effect.

>Invicta
Won.
>TAG
Won.
>TUDOR
Won.
>Orient
Won.
Seiko
Won.
>OMEGA
Won.

>ROLEX
Lost.
>PATEK
Lost.
>Richard
WON!

>>17155801
>be me
>buy a Patek
>as I walk out of the store, the SA stops me
>"hum sorry sir, haven't you read the sign? You don't actually own it. You have to give it back"
>mfw I bought a Patek but dont actually own it

>>17155830
Can you at least get a bigger fucking picture?

>>17155849
Do you become the king of basedboys if you buy this

B A R R E L C A S E

>>17155855
no

>>17155820
>pink
>fags only
Pink watches, if done right, can be kino!

>>17155819
I have dysgraphia, reading watch faces is difficult for me. This is why I have stuck to digital until now.

Might buy the Tag HUEHUE from my AD for $2000 if they agree to it.

>>17155849
If it had a normal case shape, dial and bezel in that two-tone metal it would be kino. Now it just looks overwhelming and all over the place.

>>17155820
Anon, you're too insecure to wear anything without "I'M STRAIGHT PLEASE BELIEVE ME" engraved on the back of the case.

>>17155867
>dysgraphia
Well, it's a theme

>>17155813
Budget?

Is there a more underrated dial color than dark red? It's not commonly used, but it looks so fancy and attractive to me.

>>17155866
Which?

>>17155901
tag heuer aquaracer professional 300 blue new

>>17155813

>>17155866
Whats msrp?

>>17155912
>pointy hands
>stubby 7
>upside down numerals
2/10

>>17155801
That area code is for Slough, the worst place in England.

>>17155833

The GD-X6900 is basically a completely different watch than the regular 6900. It's bigger but the numbers are super crisp and it works fast as fuck. Its got a hueg battery and passed the same toughness tests as the "King", that overpriced huge square, but the GDX isnt as popular and thus you can find it for dirt cheap.

>>17155830
>>17155849
When I was 23 I had the Casio Edifice with the Iron Man tie-in. Actually was a great watch and one of my favourites of all time. I'd buy a NOS one in a heartbeat.

>>17155922
You want UNpointy hands?
Retard

>>17155922
the hands are the best bit imo

Cope, if you must, and you will.

post your want-list.

>>17155939
No.

>>17155943
okay.

>>17155939
>Seiko SPB143
>Seiko SNE573p1
>DOXA SUB 300

fallen out of love for luxury shit, just give me a couple cool divers and im all set.

>>17155935
>ralph lauren
>luxury

>richard mille
>seems to have fallen out of the 'from a christmas cracker' section

>no pagani in "ultra luxury"

oh no no no no no no. that's a no.

>>17155820
I would absolutely rock a pink watch, but the pattern on that thing is a monstrosity.

>>17155939
Rolex GMT Master II root beer
Rolex Datejust (two tone everose, jubilee, flutted bezel, dark gray or blue dial)
Rolex Oyster Perpetual yellow
Jaeger Lecoultre Reverso green
Grand Seiko SBGW275
Parmigiani Fleurier Tonda PF GMT
Laurent Ferrier Gallet

>>17155939
Seiko 5 Sports SSK003K1, Sinn 1736 Classic, Tissot PRX T1372101108100, Seiko Presage SPB227J1, and Seiko Dolce SACM150.

>>17155951
cont.
>Sinn 556a
>Citizen Aqualand JP2007
>Timex Ironman Triathlon (vintage)

>>17155987
I want one of these. It was my first real watch. I missed out on a mint example a few weeks ago.

>>17155990
They’re so baller.
Ol’ Billy wore one aswell

I'm gonna go to the mall to buy Airpods tomorrow. Any cool mallshitters I should be on the look out for while I'm there?

Modern watches disgust me. Too large, too thick, too distasteful. Those flat mineral and saphire crystals are awful.
Give me a good old vintage watch, gold plate, none of that modern PVD shit, 33mm, with a thin as fuck mechanical movement that still works perfect 50 years later without any service.
Give me that thicc domed acrylic crystal
Give me that flexible gold plated bracelet.
God the 70's were the best era in modern history. Fuck the current year.

>>17155866
They retail for $3300? 2k ain't happening

>>17156008

>>17156008
Another sight of perfection

The watchmaker who assembled this watch made a small mistake.
Can you spot it?

>>17156008
I own a Swiss shitter from the 1960s and I think it has more personality than 99% of the watches made today (bronze baton hands and markers, metallic black/grey dial, steel case, black lamb leather strap). Had it serviced some time ago, still works perfect.

>>17155987
>>17155996
Personally I really want a expedtion, that holographic display makes the watch easy to read even in low light and it has thr vintage look of the old atlantis 100

>>17156008
What's stopping you from buying a quartz women's watch with a domed crystal?

>>17156022
this?

>>17156028
Or any smaller watch with a domed crystal for that matter?

>>17155939
62GS, 61GS, SBGA111.

>>17156030
No the watch I posted is a recased expedition movement in an old atlantis case afaik
This is the expidition stock look

>>17156030
And this is the old atlantis 100
Essentially the same watch in terms of looks except for the holographic display of the expedition

>>17156018
making it look so gay?

>>17156018
The thingy that holds the balance spring in place?

>>17155924
Very cool, thanks anon. I'll keep my eye out for a deal but might be bigger than I like on my wrists

>>17156045
It's a Cartier anon, of course it's kinda gay.
>>17156046
Nop. It's not in the movement.

>>17156018
I dunno I doubt it's a mistake, but the hour hand is on top

>>17156050
The X is put in the wrong way, it doesn't curve with the case.

>>17155834
Was this a more recent downgrade and is just another sign of their worsening QC or was it like this from the start?

>>17156050
Are you talking about the watch maker's 4? Are you really a pleb?

>>17156058
No, look at the 10, it's upside down.

>>17155996
He wore that shit purely for optics.
As soon as he left, richer by 100M btw, he was sporting Rolex just like everyone else.
I raff when some soi posts obama with that shitty chink OEM the secret service gifted to him that, again, he wore for the camera.
As soon as he was out of office it was TAG then up.

>>17156053
yep

>Tudor

>>17156062
All those ''x''s are positioned in the same way

>>17156062
>>17156063
>>17156066
Oh ok nvm i see it now. Good eye.

>>17155898
REEEEEEEEEE DON'T POST IT YOU MAKE ME SEETHE FROM REGRET!

>>17155898
wot model seiko dis be

>>17156004
seiko 5

>>17155898
inb4
>oris
I really like the cherry aquis.

>>17155898
STRONG RED>meh orange

>>17156074
nevermind. SARB011

>>17156074
SBGH269. There is a green (like peacock) version as well.

>>17155939
Heuer Monaco
Heuer Carrera Reissue in gold
Enicar Sherpa Graph

>>17156087

>>17156093
Why does GS cost more than $500 btw?

>>17155939
IWC Portofino Chronograph 39
Sinn 6000
Jaeger LeCoultre Master Hybris Mechanica Calibre 184

>>17156008
Ok, grampa.

>>17156098
Can’t get past the horrid bezel on that Sinn, man, wowsers.

>>17156093
And a lighter, mossy green one too.

>>17156078
That one is great too

>>17156018
No "Cartier" in VII.

>>17156084
The earlier sarbs were wicked with their faceted crystals.

>>17155866
Be firm and ready to pay if they say yes

>>17156097
You have to see them in person to be able to really understand why.

>>17156097
delete this now please

>>17156008
>mechanical movement that still works perfect 50 years later without any service.
Lol. Excellent pasta.

>>17156063
Sprezzatura.

>>17156108
When i say earlier i mean the first two.

>>17156110
Use your words.

>>17155939
>your want-list
Another snk366
I have put a few scratches on my current one.

Bill Clinton was actually one of the first people to get a black PVD sub when they started being modded.
Pic related is the one he owns

>>17156120
Sword hands look so much better on a sub than mercedes hands

>Obama wore a tag
>Yung Lean wears a tag
>Gosling wears a tag
>Leonardo DiCaprio wears a tag
We won

>>17155939

>>17156130
tardus tardus

>>17156126
Why the fuck did you have to add obama to the list and ruin it?

>>17156126
>We
In that context we=faggots

>>17155935
>Entry-level luxury
>GS

>>17155955
>>17156141
The chart is clearly made by someone who is dumb or pretending to be dumb. No need to respond these posts.

>>17156126
obongo wore a tag for like 2seconds and then got a datejust or a skydweller with his $50mill netflix kickbackaroonie.

>>17156145
he doesnt wear a rolex he only wears omega

>>17156130
someone redpill me on the accutron

>>17156118
I admit these do look nice. No zaratsu though. And the indices are nicer on the GS. And the hands. And the movement.

>>17156147
invented before quartz
works with battery+tuning fork
makes a humming noise like an old radio
smoothest seconds hands ever
very cool and above my means

>>17155898
Is there a watch with a dark red-ish purple dial, like Pantone 690C/#612141?

Anyone else hate chronographs?
>They clutter the dial, they're useless but not the aesthetic kind of useless like a moonphase.
>You'll never fucking use it.
>Adds to service cost substantially, whether you use it or not.
>Makes the watch FATTER.
I've tried to like some but at most it's the Sinn 356 with the 38mm case and hesalite.
I can understand sporty or tool chronos to some degree, but dressy chronos are an anathema.
I thought it was a recent phenomenon until I saw old prominent name pocketwatches from like 1909 and the late victorian era that had chronographs.
The owner of such a watch wouldn't have ever needed to use it ever.
Patek wristwatches from the 50's had chronos. Same as above.
So why choose it?
I suppose I just value simplicity of dial and legibility above all and chronos shit all over that for no good reason.

>>17156151
Not 10x nicer though.

Btw, remember when Seiko SARB/SARX used to look absolutely identical to Grand Seiko and you could get them for less than $500, before they tripled the price and made them worse on purpose?

I wear an oversized watch

>>17156162
Is that your orient star?

>>17156163
get on my level

>>17156147
The old ones were made to a degree of precision that's not possible today. Not because it's impossible, but because nobody wants to front the expense and everyone has gotten lazy and use computers for everything unlike the designers of the accurtron.
They were top of the line watches providing exceptional accuracy in an era where time was still told based off a wound up piece of metal and two hammers.
Literally
>THE WATCH OF THE SPACE AGE FUTURE!
Cept that all went down the toilet didn't it?

>>17156160
I agree and I especially hate having the chrono hand just sitting there, obscuring much of the dial.

>>17155939

>>17156141
Grand Seiko IS entry level, there's nothing wrong with that. That's why it's liked so much among the non rich.

>>17156177

Left most column is supposed to be “feeling”

>>17156160
I suppose you're just dumb.

>>17156159
It'd be hard to find one with the exact color, but there are some funky colored watches out there.

>>17156159

>>17156177
What's up with the two jlc moonies? The date is probably the gayest master control. Full calendar is pretty cool. All the parmigiana seem redundant also. 2 divers seem redundant.

>>17156031
I've got a Casio very similar to the Presage and it is quite elegant, even if a bit boring

>>17156195
It wasn't about the exact color, I added it more to give an idea of what I meant. That watch looks great.

>>17156197
This one's a little more purple than red, but still much better than most other purple dials I've seen.

>>17156201
>I disagree with someone ELSE wish list
Why is retardation so common in these threads?

>>17156177

>>17155820
It comes in 30 different colors. Pick a different one if the only thing stopping you from gobbling balls is a color.

>>17156214
Don't want an opinion, don't post your list

>>17156160
No, I only like chronographs

>>17156201

Sorry you’re right I should be more clear. This is the list for my next watch, but if I get a JLC or a PF I would remove the other from the list.

>>17156061
I think he was told to stop wearing it. Anything watch he wears would be for optics.

>>17156160
I'm not particularly fond of them. They are easy to mess up design wise and i personally don't find much use for them in my life.

>>17156216

Imagine not doing this for a large purchase. Could not be me

>>17156160
I only like bi compax. Enough complexity, symmetry, and style without shitting the entire dial up.

>>17156162
>Not 10x nicer though.
Diminishing returns. Is a Patek costing 30k 10 times nicer than a Longines costing 3k? If you view everything through those lens than idk what to tell you. If you want a GS designed GS finished watch then you buy a GS.
>remember when Seiko SARB/SARX used to look absolutely identical to Grand Seiko
I wouldn't say they were identical, but they were very nice for their price. The Seiko that made them doesn't exist anymore though, with the popularity of GS they figured they could piggyback their way into a higher price point and they are currently still in that process. Most Seikos were too cheap for what they were anyway.
The Sharp edge series aren't that far off the SARX vibe though.

>>17156197

What happened to Omegadrunk? Did his liver finally gave up?

>Grand Seiko

can't save, changes from jpg to webm, but link...
https://cdn2.chrono24.com/images/uhren/23102553-ba1x0mkq6wrrk8o40hux2ts0-ExtraLarge.jpg
not sure if want. do want? don't want? think i sort of want

>>17156276
Guaranteed this was made by a Nomos owner trying to deflect away from his watch.

>>17156278
Only if you're a woman in a man's body, AND you have a sugar daddy.

>>17156177
I had one of these after i got my first Seiko, i would browse and write down anything i even remotely liked. Looking back on it, what the fuck was i thinking lol.

>>17156267
I don't know. He hasn't posted for a while. But also, good, I hope he's dead or, barring that, I hope he's in a lot of pain somewhere.

>>17156276
no one likes your rep daytona lol

>>17156281

>>17156284
Why is nothing good on that "wish" list? Only seiko's.

>>17156160
>Anyone else hate chronographs?
No. In fact, I think you're an idiot. A chronograph is the 3rd most useful complication after a date and diving bezel. The immense complexity of it is the appeal. Some of the most beautiful watches ever made are chronographs and if you don't appreciate the genius that goes into a rattrapante, I'm inclined to say you don't really understand much about mechanical watchmaking.

>>17156276
>running with a coaxial
lmao it broke but she couldn't tell the difference

>>17156212

>>17156177
>the only watch you want from AP is the Royal Oak (no model number given)
>the only watch you want from Vacheron is the Overseas
>the only watch you want from Lange is the Odysseus
>3 Rolex on your list
Congratulations. You have fucking atrocious taste.

>>17156292
>useful
lmao
>muh maths
more lmao

>>17156285
You are an asshole. You probably can't afford any nice watch, too. Kys

>>17156257
>Most Seikos were too cheap for what they were anyway.
Wanna buy my piss for $1mil per bottle retard? You'd probably brag to your rich friends how you found a more expensive bottle than they can.

>>17156168
Bruh...

>>17156296
>Dry shit brown dial
Hard pass

>>17156302
>timing something with a watch is not useful

>>17156291
Because i was (still am) poor, liked Seiko, and didn't know that many other brands. Mind you the plan was to buy one or two out of those, and eventually save enough money for a GS. I have since fallen into the vintage Seiko rabbit hole, i have 8 watches and don't really need more, maybe i'll manage to get a GS one day, but other than that i'm pretty much done with watches.

>>17156298
No, guys that buy
>>17156168
without an ounce of selfawareness or irony have atrocious taste. This faggot >>17156177 does't have any taste or opinions of his own at all. He thinks he wants what other people want because they want it.
Null taste. Actual NPC shit right here.

Why don't they make (mechanical) watches with a countdown function? I find this a lot more useful than a chronograph.
I cook a lot of pasta and a countdown would be actually useful (only if the watch can ring).

>>17156259

>>17156313
>fallen into the vintage Seiko rabbit hole
That I can respect. Congrats.
GS is just an overpriced Seiko.

>>17156318
Or this
https://youtu.be/c_kg3kdpUMM?t=181

>>17156306
It's red.

>>17156307
Not useful if you never actually use it. Chronofags never use this function except for timing the most mundane shit so that they can feel like choosing it was justified.

>>17156298
>>17156315

Cope and seethe my friends! : ^ }

>>17156331
>Not useful if you never actually use it
>chronofags use it for timing mundane shit
>somehow it is still not useful
Your brain rot is too advanced. Sorry, there's nothing we can do.

>>17156318
I've often thought the same thing. Best you can get is a countdown bezel or an alarm watch like
>>17156325
Not the same as having countdown subdials though.

>>17156324
Its a much better Seiko. It's a GRAND Seiko.

>>17156078
That's nice

>>17156318
>Why don't they make (mechanical) watches with a countdown function?
Yes, they do. They are called "ALARM" watches.

Why are most day complications made with the English initials? That's why I don't like them, in a Swiss watch for instance I'd expect French initials

>>17156326
Bloody diahrrea red

>>17156315

Maybe he’s in the market for a luxury steel sports watch?

>>17156153
>smoothest seconds hands ever

>>17156348
You don't like GS, we get it.

>>17156336
When you have to invent reasons for using something, reasons you wouldn't normally ever bother with, then it's functionally a gimmick and not really useful.
Chronographs are as much an upsell gimmick as moonphases and tourbillons. You are not an astronaut, jet figher pilot, race car driver or anyone else who's miraculously bereft of their usual instrumentation and has to rely on their backup wrist watch. You are a fag that sits at a desk and times how many times he has to fap during a work day.
Functionally useless for 99.99% of buyers.

>>17156303
kek

>>17156361
>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T JUSE USE YOUR WATCH TO TIME THINGS! YOU AREN'T AN ASTRONAUT!
Powerful stuff.

>>17156342
Unfortunately alarm watches aren't as precise, inversely, compared with a chrono. Can't time things dowb to the precise second. I think they're usually accurate to within 5 or 10 mins?

>>17156368
>I bought my MAAAAAN ON THE MOOOON like leddit told me to all so I could... um, uh, er time the pasta and steaks I guess?
wow
such utility

>>17156339
A much FATTER Seiko.

>>17156382
Why would you time pasta? You just pick one and taste it

>>17156389
Don't know. But there sure are a lot of chronograph wearers out there that find timing pasta the absolute height of their glorified gym stopwatch experience.

>>17156404
I wouldn't mind it if they said: "I just appreciate the mechanical brilliance involved with making a good chronograph" or something, but when they insist that it's actually useful it becomes kind of laughable. If you think about it, it's about the same deal as with using a watch at all these days

>>17155951
sne573 is the best watch seiko has put out in years. good taste.

>>17156382
Why can't I time my instant noodles with my watch?

>>17156422
Sorry pal. You can only use your chronograph to record racing laps, because I said so.

>>17156423
Sad that when I still used to do athletics I didn't care about watches yet

>>17156370
There was a kinda chronograph with alarm fuction that chimes when it reaches it's mark. It's made by Glasshutte Original and is actually a countdown watch. BUT is awfully expensive, pepertual calendar prices.

>>17156435
Oh, yeah, a Christophe Claret too.

>>17156423
Unless it's graduated for pulsations, then you can only use it to measure people's heart rate.

>>17156361
Fat like my cock

Are there other (cheaper) watches than can be read from the side, like this?

my niggas
I am now based and Sinn-pilled

>>17156361
>>17156422
>>17156423
>>17156382
I mean the bigger thing here is that a basic Casio shitter or Timex ironman will time all of your bullshit, so you really are doing backflips to justify an analog chronograph. Like I use my ironman to time my Ribeyes when I ice bath them and also when I sear them but that's a $30 shitter so I also don't care when it gets splattered with bone marrow

>>17156489
If I was ever going to buy a meme automatic relic it'd be a Sinn or two no doubt.

>>17156494
>you don't need a mechanical watch when a quartz does the job better
Wow, I'd never thought of that. Thanks for enlightening me. I'll be throwing all my mechanical watches in the trash now.

>>17156361
>race car driver
What if I like to pretend I am?

>>17156489
Oh is that yours? I've been toying around with the idea of buying one. A luxury beater. Looks nice, is it the tegimented one? I think the rubber strap would be max comfy.

>>17156489
Nice anon, is that yours or do you have to wait to take delivery?

>>17156513
>luxury
>Sinn

>>17156519
>hurr anything that isnt rolex or patek isnt luxury
your $1200 franken sky king isnt luxury bro.

>>17156522
holy GIGA COPE. Refer to the chart

>>17156527
>refer to this forced meme i keep shilling
yeah nah

>>17156530
Sinn makes good watches. But they're not luxury. Study harder.

Holy shit guys I found an Air King at the gym

>>17156527
You never post your watches, you don't provide anything to this thread. Go back to r*ddit and your circlejerk forums.

>heres how my mumbai special rolex/daytona rep is luxury

>>17156535
I'm rich, I'm right, and also you're coping over THE CHART

>>17156542
>Never posted evidence of his networth, his watch or anything
Just a poorfag replica fan

>>17156163
The proportion between the watch and your arm kind of makes you look like a marionette.

>>17155939
I have everything I want at the moment. Casio is the only company that makes watches that pique my interest. Unless they release something cool for the 40th anniversary I'm not buying anything.

>>17156056
The pins were added in 2012 while the monobloc case design was removed in 2006 with the launch of the 5711.

>>17156564
Best gshock made so far

>>17156564
Why not just buy a fucking rolex look at the fucking chart

>>17155939
Zenith El Primero
Credor Eichi II

>>17156195
I've never heard of Anordain before, but that dial is gorgeous.

>>17155799
Why do you enjoy wearing a watch in [CURRENT YEAR]? I could never get used to the feeling.

>>17156591

>>17156597
Nice Breitling on the NATO

>>17156596
Not everyone has autism or some sort of assburgers stimulation sensitivity
Once you get used to wearing one it feels weird if you don't have one on

>>17156601
Is this some elaborate joke about hispanic people?

>>17156597
Truly shocking.

>>17156519
I would consider a $3500 beater a luxury.

>>17156611
You would be wrong. Refer to the chart.

>>17156018
You’re not talking about the IIII instead of IV are you? If so that’s accepted in clock and watch-making. Even back in Roman times IIII was used from time to time.

>>17156616
Read the thread, numbnuts.

>>17156018
X, since the thread is ending

>>17156018
Is that a whole mechanism in a rotor?

Looking for analog-digital watches, what's the cheapest watch worth buying? I've seen casio foresters that fit the style but they seem to be out of production
It's already a niche enough category so I don't want to limit it further. I can't read analog watches but digital doesn't fit businesswear.

>>17156616
This has already been addressed you idiot

>>17155799
Any silicone/polyurethane strap recommendations that are okay price/quality ratio?

>>17156641
Yeah. Well, some of it is in the case. 7 sapphire discs to make it work. Pretty smart engineering by Cartier.

>>17156650
>digital doesn't fit businesswear
Everyone wears apple watches.

>>17156650
>digital doesn't fit businesswear.

That's such an absolute lie. Get a metal/metal tone and it's fine

>>17156505
Based

Should I get an Omega if I want to larp as an antarctic explorer?

>>17155834
What watches do you classify as being for men of taste and appreciation for craftsmanship, anon?

>>17156259
Thing is, a pearly red like the center slice of a cabbage would actually be a neat dial face.

>>17156650
just grab this if you want something really cheap, and something that will a suit:https://www.amazon.com/Casio-AQ-230A-1D-Silver-Black-Watch/dp/B007CZ21V2/ref=d_pb_allspark_dp_sims_pao_desktop_session_based_sccl_2_4/137-6893022-4086005?pd_rd_w=z5CwP&content-id=amzn1.sym.6b5008ac-c24a-4aea-a3ea-015a531184f5&pf_rd_p=6b5008ac-c24a-4aea-a3ea-015a531184f5&pf_rd_r=DHTH6RJAWKTZ3P269GN5&pd_rd_wg=eb2NY&pd_rd_r=16bb033e-0499-404a-aea2-d88339c94a9f&pd_rd_i=B007CZ21V2&psc=1

Question is, do you want a watch that's more suited to outdoors type stuff?

>>17156701
A. Lange & Sohne, Gronefeld, Vacheron Constantin with the exception of the FiftySix Self-Winding, Greubel Forsey, H. Moser & Cie, Laurent Ferrier, L.U. Chopard, late 90s Ulysse Nardin, JLC

>>17156737
My budget isn’t really more than $3k. Are Junghans respectable? I liked the look of the Max Bill…

>>17156697
Yes

>>17156743
Nope, but if you actually care about watchmaking at that price range you should buy either a Tudor or a Nomos.

>>17156745
Homos is gay, buy a Tudor.

>>17156747
Tudor is a cope watch. It's really not much better.

>AD wont sell a GMT Heritage Tudor for 3k
Am I in the wrong or them? They wouldn't budge on even $3250 (3600 MSRP)

>>17156757
Not a GMT my bad but still

>>17156757
In the current market you're not going to get that much off a Tudor. Some undesirable TAG dog, maybe you'd get that percentage. Tudor isn't struggling to sell their watches.

Should I buy this Steinhart GMT or save my money for a Black Bay Pro?

>>17156097
Star gang

Tag Aquaracer (models after 2018)>Omega Seamen Master
Sorry someone had to say it.

>>17156768
BASED

>>17156764
Hows the lume, accuracy and comfort like on that model? Any regrets?

>>17156716
Call Grand Samurai Seiko NOW!

What's the verdict on these casioaks

>>17155939
L.U.C QF JUBILEE
JLC Polaris
Omega ck 859
VC cow horn
VC traditionalle
GS sbgh273
GS sgbx341
Rolex 36mm white gold rainbow day-date

>>17156788
I want one

>>17156788
Actually became a good choice with the addition of solar.
Wish the lume was good enough on its own so I wouldn't have to press the button for the light though.

>>17156788
Is this aftermarket case and bracelet or did casio finally start making them like this?

I want it so bad bros. I’ve been looking at this for months but hesitant on pulling the trigger

>>17156819
Real
https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/g-shock-gmb2100-full-metal-casioak-2022

>>17155502
Victorinox Airboss, heard it has amazing lume

>>17155939
>Obris Morgan Aegis II
>Seiko Presage SRPE45
>Victorinox Airboss, surprised I just saw it mentioned already

>>17156779
Lume is great but I’ve only had it for a year, so no word on long term lume. Bracelet is way better than base model orient, which was how I justified the purchase lmao. Accuracy is pretty good, I generally reset every week or so and it’s never super out off. I wear mine constantly and like it a lot but if you have sub-7” wrists I could see this being a little large. It’s noticeably heavy but not at all uncomfortable. I caught mine for $500 and would absolutely pay that again for it, it’s a very nice watch.

>>17156768
>Sorry someone had to say it
Yes, a retarded person.

>>17156795
I've always found platinum watches to be awesome. I have a modest 18k gold watch, and have looked for platinum, but it seems as if platinum is only used by upper tier watch designers, such as Rolex.

The matte silver looks great, like quiet, minimalist class.

>>17156744
But Sir Edmund Hillary wore a Rolex

Damn credor made some ugly watches

>>17156788
I have never been a fan of the 2100 but they look pretty good. The metal ones look futuristic while the original looked minimalist.

>>17156839
Cope.

Just got this as a gift for getting my wings, what do you /fa/ggots think?

Microbrands are scams

>>17156884
think it’s ugly as shit and belongs in the trash like any other swatch group (((swiss))) made watch.

>>17156884
Based

>>17156890
you dont even own a real watch

how do I stop myself from buying microbrand shitters

>>17156884
real nice, I love Hammies

>>17156893
buy seiko, citizen or even invicta instead. microbrands are scams

>people start calling out the retard's replica daytona
>he stops posting his daytona+anime toy image every thread
LOL

>>17156891
>>17156894
Thanks Kings

>>17156895
>microbrands are scams
What the fuck does this even mean? It's not like I don't get the watch and they all use readily available movements so they're easy to replace

>>17156918
>Don't like the watch
>Check resale value
>It doesn't exist
Even the shittiest Tags and Omegas keep good resell value lmao.

>>17156788
This still remains king, I'm afraid.

I cant decide on a color.... which is the most
/fa/

>>17156936
Top right, bottom middle
Great choice of whatch btw

>>17156936
I personally like the original kamasu more than the new one. You honestly can't go wrong, just get the one you find yourself looking at the most

>>17156954
Are these original or new?

>>17156958
The original kamasus have the rectangle indices (top right and top center on >>17156936 ) while the second version has the round ones (all the other ones in the pic)

>>17156954
Nvrm I think i got it.

The ones with the circular marks is the gen2 and the rectangular ones is gen 1. Right?

>>17156936
You need to buy a ROLEX ROLEX ROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLEX

>>17156977
boiohoo

>>17156984

new

>>17156926
If you don't like the watch why the fuck are you buying it? Why in the fuck are you buying things at all if you plan on selling them later? I just don't fucking get it. If I buy something it's to have it.

>>17156690
ref nr on this?

>>17156860
He let the nepalese bag carrier wear the rolex. Hillary wore a Smith's.

>>17157208
>nepalese bag carrier
The Sherpas hard carry literally every single expedition. Probably 1 or 2 westerners would have ever reached the peak of Everest without them.

New watch. What do you think?

>>17157238
too big

rocking my flieger today

>>17157010
A500WGA-9DF according to google

>>17156667
Those people are fags

>>17155898
Thinking of saving up for a Seiko SRPE41J1. It's a bit expensive for what it is (€450 for 4R35 and hardlex) and I don't have a lot of money, but I love this color dial so much.

>>17157238
Nice.

>>17156864
they've only made one nice model

>>17156825
how do you even pull the trigger? you're buying from the gray market?

>>17155939
qt goth gf with thicc thighs

>>17156763
Nah go for this

>>17156763
Both are garbege.
Get a Seiko 5

>>17157247
Archimede?

>>17158093
Laco

>>17155856
The dial texture is really nice.