/fa/ - Fashion

Post good watches

>>17147762
So the golf club is the minute hand, what happens once it reaches 60? Does it instantly flyback to 0? Or is it a bit more delayed to imitate a golf swing? Also, Mickey should be looking at the ball, that's terrible form.

>>17147763
its an instant flyback

Cope, if you must, and you will.

>>17147769
Yeah, I looked it up on YouTube, looks a bit awkward when it's back at 0, no wonder all the photos online show the time at around 30/35. Think I prefer the Donald Duck version.

Kikou Ibe

Posting my Speedmaster Broad Arrow again because I need approval from anonymous guys on 4chan

Why aren't the rest of you fat cunts out hiking today as well?

I really like this watch, but I'm a bit apprehensive dropping 2k on a watch from a company that also sells $300 watches. What do I do.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39XTCtqeItc

Gets a Rolex. Immediately cuts off his partner and changes the channel name to his name. LMFAO.

>>17147807
Just don't buy it retard. You can get 4 Rolexes with the exact same Chink movement for that much.

>>17147759
Those are teardrop lugs. Cornes de vache means cow horn.

>>17147795
Very nice, love the hand set, how much?
>>17147798
I did some yesterday, though it's far too humid for anything too intense at the moment.

>>17147821
Nice Furlan Marri... oh.

>>17147807
I like this, looks sleek and monolithic.

>>17147795
Let me ask you a question.
If some guy came to you and offered you the possibility to trade your Sneedmaster against a Daytona or a GMT Master II, would you accept?
The only part of the deal is you can't sell it.

Of course you would accept. Because the sole reason of modern Omega's existence is to be a Rolex cope.

I can't decide between these two.

>>17147852
JLC (white dial).
The GO is grotesque and a way too obvious ALS cope.

>>17147769
>>17147762
>Post good watches
Solely because Gerald Genta aren't mentioned here enough. Picrel

>>17147795
Very nice, my friend.

>>17147852
I too vote for JLC, m8.

>>17147852
J L C
L
C

>>17147852
Meistersinger

>>17147848
I would not accept against a Daytona unless it's a much earlier one like from the 70s. Hate the aesthetic of the Daytona, desu.

I like the GMT Master more, but probably would only trade if it's one with an aluminum bezel insert. Hate the way the numbers on the ceramic bezel are fat. I guess I could accept them just pop off the ceramic bezel and replace it with an aluminum one.

I would also definitely rebuy a Speedmaster.

>>17147862
disgusting

>>17147822
I paid $3,250 when I bought bought it but I the prices on speedmasters are up now.

>>17147852
>hey that watch looks nice
>look at site
>capeshit marketing
https://www.jaeger-lecoultre.com/us-en/watches/master-ultra-thin

>>17147852
JLC all the way
Avoid and Swatch grupp product

>>17147862
One of the worst date windows I've ever seen
Was that watch drawn by a child?

>>17147852
Looks better than ALS.

>>17147877
what the fuck that looks terrible

thoughts on leijona? i am a poorfag and i was looking for some vintage looking dress watch.

>>17147883
Post the watch and not some anime character faggot.

What's the best moonphase available?
Is there anything better than this Arnold & Son?

>>17147883
Buy some vintage handwound Seiko like picrel.

What happened to the JLC Geophysic?
Did they just discontinue it? I always wanted one

>>17147886
I like Schaumburg Moon watches, but they're kinda expensive for what they are.

>>17147855
>>17147821
>>17147795

>>17147890
>What happened to the JLC Geophysic?
>Did they just discontinue it?
It was a limited edition made to celebrate some anniversary.

Thinking of buying this, i don't have a square watch yet and i like the dial.

>>17147855
What does the scale say fatboy?

>>17147886
This one.

>>17147890
They also discontinued their sector dial watches.
A shame cause the chronograph especially is really cool.

>>17147898
>square
*square-ish

>>17147887
beautiful clock. expensive?

>>17147902
Best sector dial watch out there. The Longines one isn't bad either, and maybe that Laine(?).

>>17147759
Got this, what outfits do you wear with it?

>>17147904
Nah, i paid 120€ for mine, they can be had for around 200 on eBay, depending on the condition. If you have around 400-600 you could find an Omega.

>>17147848

>>17147759
W2c?

>>17147891
I actually like this (scam)burg

>>17147855
Nice, lawyer.

>>17147913
>simping for (((Swatch)))
pathetic

>>17147891
>>17147919
resale value on these?

f*ck him.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39XTCtqeItc

>>17147927
Why? He's just changing the name of his channel.

>>17147926
Shit, probably.

>>17147852
Get the JLC but I prefer the white dial. If you’re buying preowned make sure to get one with the updated golden rotor.

do you guys think target has fa watches?

>>17147927
Who cares?

is this fa?

>>17147926
Probably shit.

>>17147949
No this is mall shitter teritory.

>>17147944
No

>>17147949
NO

>>17147810
Didn't he have a Rolex way before that? A no date sub if i remember correctly.

i love this watch but i hate these straps.
anyone have any /fa/ straps that would go well with it?

>>17147970
but sers. the mall is meant for shits

>>17147982
Yeah, he's had a couple. He got rid of the Sub supposedly because he was afraid of getting robbed in London. He probably just sold it because the prices were getting insane.

Can anyone help me find a T200-2ajf in stock for a reasonable price (ideally below 420, I don't really want to pay much more than the dark blue dial which is usually around 380 new). Do you think I can pull off the light dial with blonde armhair?

>>17148002
>Do you think I can pull off the light dial with blonde armhair?
No, I'm very sorry. The sad reality is that if you have blonde armhair, you can never wear watches with dials lighter than dark blue. I don't make the rules

whats the most /fa/ casio f91w colorway?
all black looks school shooter tier

>>17148012
No school shooter ever wore a rolex. Think about it.

>>17148012
Hate to break it to you pal but if you're trying to look fashionable with a Casio, it's not going to happen. It's the watch of literal, unironic autists (as opposed to me, the ironic autist)

>>17148014
how ironic

>Jody
WON
>TUDOR
They WON
>OMEGA
Stay winning!
>Rolex
LOST
>Rolexfags
Seething+COPING

>>17147999
iirc he sold the Sub because he already had a Tudor BB58 which was too similar. Also he had a Kermit too.
Now I have no idea what kind of stupid reasoning you have to come up with to sell a Sub and keep a BB58, but I'm pretty sure this was his explanation.

How does wt feel about the new Willards?

>>17148035
I'm thinking about getting the white one but it's $1000 for a 6r35 movement

>>17147989
No. Use the designated shitting street, sir.

>>17147887
That looks similar to the tissot visodate that I’m looking at right now. I know people shit in tissot but goddamn I love the style of that watch. Plus automatic, sapphire crystal, powermatic 80 movement, and the date doesn’t slowly roll over, it snaps. For 400-600 I feel like it’s a good value

>>17148037
Or a designated shitting mall if you find one.

>>17148035
I like the white one, but only because it reminds me of the white Seamaster.

Seiko is the only logical route

Buying the Tudor Root beer

>>17148036
6r35 is an OK movement, you can get it regulated and it'll keep good time.

>>17148035
Is that really the new Willard? Do they call it that? The case is different, better looking than the old Willard if you ask me, but i can imagine some people won't take the change well.

>>17148035
probably their best design in a while

>>17147798
Nicest g-shock right there.

>>17148051
>14.6mm thick
>capped gold
Don't.

>>17148070
Whats wrong with either of those? I think it looks good on my wrist

>>17148072
I think it looks chunky and thick. It's a big slab of metal on the wrist.
As for capped gold, I think it's kinda cheap. I'd go for the full steel version.

>>17147922
I don't care the owner is jewish because I'm not a fucking loser

>>17148077
shit wrong pic

>>17148080
what an ugly design

>>17148080
I was considering that one or the black/red "coke" variant

>>17148087
boohoo

>>17147949
No. The fact you even asked means you probably should just get it seeing as it'd match your superdry hoodie.

>>17148133
based

This thread is better than sneaker general

>>17148035
Nice, how much? I can't afford a Tudor so the first one would be great for me.

>>17148146
That's because sneakers are for niggers, so a thread about sneakers would be full of these fucking animals.

>im mexican
what watch do i buy

Its growing on me

>>17148146
That's because everyone in sneaker general is 16
>>17148010
Kek, point taken


Shame I just don't like something about Pic related but can't place my finger on it. I think traditional/digital is pretty neat and adds a lot more features without cluttering the dial significantly.

>>17148168
what the fuck is this?

Coke vs Pepsi?

>>17148161
This was one of the El Chapo's watches.

>>17148080
jesus that thing is fat

>>17148208
damn he had style

>>17148207
Drink: Coke
Rolex: Pepsi

>>17148077
>>17148080
>>17148216
People really overblow the thickness I think. I too had written it off because I thought it was too thick until I actually handled one at the boutique. Ended up buying it over the other watches I was considering.

It's not as thin as a GMT Master, sure but it's really not that bad as long as your wrist is over 7 inches. I even prefer it to the black bay pro.

>>17148216
It's only 2mm thicker than the GMT Master II, but because the movement in the Tudor is thicker they had to make a thick case and thin bezel.
I think it's more unbalanced than thick.

>>17148233
The thickness is just exacerbated by the sides being flat. If the case was broken up in some way to hide the thickness it would work a lot better.

>>17147949
>PVD ):p

>>17148232
>>17148233
It looks like a giant slab of steel because of the case design but 15mm is really not that terrible. I don't think it's a dealbreaker

>>17148251
You know it is actually better than the regular black bay because they slightly bevelled it while the regular one has no bevel. Still though I think people make too much of it.

I haven't thought about the thickness even once while wearing it since i got it.

>>17148232
Yikes

Why are Tudor "Heritage" models cheaper than the GMT/Black bay? The heritage designs are far more interesting

>>17148264
The Black Bay is the same price as the Black Bay 58.
The GMT is more expensive because the movement is more complicated. It's also a true GMT (meaning you can set the hour hand while the watch is still running) which is a hard thing to do.

>>17148054
yes, its a good $30 mvt in a $1000 watch

>>17148232
a regular Submariner for comparison

>>17148049
*Orient

>>17148289
pre MAXXXI case though?

Old GMT that my dad gave my sister + my Franck. I need to get a new gmt but I don’t want to fall for the Rolex meme- what should I buy?

>>17148328
get a tudor, rolex style without the rolex

I want a spring drive

>>17148330
my local ad has one if you want to come over

>>17148329
>rolex style without the rolex
What kind of a retarded selling point is this? Buy a copewatch to double down on not getting the real thing?

>>17148334
Look at this faggot trying to lure in people so he can rape them

>>17148329

Respectfully I don’t think I could pull the trigger on a Tudor. I’m a vain and petty person

>>17148335
>I want a new GMT
>I like Rolex Design
>I do not want a Rolex
>here is a GMT that is similar
are you retarded?

>>17148329
It's also missing the quality of a Rolex.

>>17148342
In what way?

>>17148328
Get a GS.

>>17148328
>I need to get a new gmt but I don’t want to fall for the Rolex meme- what should I buy?
Depends on your budget.
The one I really like is the Parmigiani Fleurier Tonda PF GMT.
Around 30k.

>>17148328
BNIB Seiko 5 SSK001 Black GMT

>>17148348
What an absolute abortion of a design.

>>17148339
He said he wants a GMT, but doesn't want to "fall for the Rolex meme". How the fuck did you get he likes Rolex from that? And why on earth would you recommend a shit version of the watch he doesn't want?

Which half of your brain is damaged?

>>17148348
Ugly as sinn

>>17148329
>get a tudor

>>17148328
TAG HEUER AQUARACER

>>17148328
Might as well buy an Invicta if you hate Rolex you fucking FREAK

>>17148328
>ROLEX
>"Meme"
Buy a fucking Fossil and FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF

>>17148233
It's thick, but that lug-to-lug looks like it might actually fit my wrist.

>rolexfags sperging out again

>>17148348
hnnnnngh it's so nice

>>17148344
He might as well buy a Swatch if he's settling for a grand shitko... Get out if you hate Rolex..

>>17148358
>>17148362
Imagine being so assblasted because someone doesn't want to buy your favorite meme brand. Pathetic.

>>17148348

Wow, what a beautiful watch. Is it actually attainable?

>>17148362
By falling for the Rolex meme I mean going to the AD and sucking their cock. Ofc I like Rolex

>>17148366
Right?
It's completely unusable as a GMT though, as the secondary hour hand isn't a 24h hand.

>>17148375
You don't have to suck anyone off for a Rolex, that's a meme made up by OMEGA fags and Tudortards to dissway people from buying a Rolex.

You're lying. Get out of my thread.Go back to r3ddit and jerk off to your Tag or Swatch... NOW!

>>17147886

>>17148374
Im just TIRED of poor people shitting on our brand. We already kicked out the Swatch and Vokstok fags and we dont need TUDOR OR OMEGA FAGS HEREA!

>>17148382
>You don't have to suck anyone off for a Rolex

>>17148375
>Wow, what a beautiful watch. Is it actually attainable?
It was announced earlier this year and the production is very limited (PF is a small brand).
I have no idea if there are waiting list for it though.

I want it

>>17148396
Poorfag non rolex cope watch!

>>17148396
nice bezel alignment

>>17148396
The angular case is nice, but it's 2chonk4me.

All watches are rolex cope watches hahahahaha

>>17148388

Really tired of you guys hating Rolex

>>17148408
>mfw sum1 posts a blonkponn in my /wt/ thread

>>17148412
nobody actually hates Rolex, people hate the annoying Rolex trolls in this thread

>>17147759
a watch for this feel?

>>17148389
You need more Seiko fags by the looks of it.

>>17148415
Well im TIRED Of people recommending terrible toy brands like Seiko, Omega, Tudor.

>>17148415
wrong
i hate rolex because the fans are annoying AF and the brand is extremely uncreative

many other watchmakers deserve the attention more

>>17148394

Wow the exposed mechanism on the back. May have to inquire about it. So there are no ADs near where I live, closest one looks to be Minnesota. Should I just call them and ask?

>>17148133
>Disclaimer: will not take you to the stars.

>>17148423
JFC they ripped off of Rolex

>>17148417
>-15/+25 per day
Impressive. Very nice. $1850 for Vostok tier accuracy.

>>17148420
>the brand is extremely uncreative
You don't buy a Rolex for creativity. You buy one because you enjoy the design language of the brand. Rolex is basically an heritage brand now. They'll keep making the same watches in 100 hears.

>be me
>go to rolex ad
>put my name down on the waiting list for the OP
>after 2 years, finally get a call
>go in store
>they bring this out
>i said, wheres the oysters at?
>sir this is a jewellery store, we don't sell oysters
mfw oyster perpetual was a lie

>>17148430
He's just mad his little Omega is made out of plastic and Rolex shits all over it hahahahahahah

>>17147759
what watch would you recommend to someone who likes pic rel?
(no chronograph, minimal clutter on the face, simplistic & fairly classy)

>>17148434
The Tag Tank perhaps?

>>17148396
wew, that is nice
I would love a spring drive but I find a lot of the Grand Seikos just look weird to me

>>17148430
just an excuse to skimp on design

>>17148423
>So there are no ADs near where I live, closest one looks to be Minnesota. Should I just call them and ask?
Well you can try.
I have no idea how is the american market for Parmigiani Fleurier. It doesnt seem like an american oriented brand so you may have a chance I guess.

>>17148434
A. Lange & Sohne Saxonia, Vacheron Constantin Traditionelle or Patrimony

>>17148434
Sell that for a Rolex GMT Pepsi.

Whats the point of the thread if we are not gonna discuss about Rolex

>>17148434
Philippe Dufour Simplicity.

Can you ESL faggots fuck off? The threads are bad enough without you retards making your nonsensical Engrish posts every 2 minutes.

>>17148446
I dont know.. but honestly when people don't reccomended Rolex I get so angry I feel like throwing my oyster at the fucking wall. People here have no taste and hate roelx they're retards and raging fuck fukc

>>17148449
No

All you really need is a rice cracker dial Seiko.

>>17148455
Not a rolex.

>buy a new watch
>already want a new one
WHEN WILL THIS CEASE?

>>17148437
Why would they suddenly make new designs? Their design language has been the same since the 50s (they released the Explorer, the Submariner and the GMT Master II in a 36 months timeframe) and it has paid off pretty well. People love classic Rolex design, so Rolex delivers what people want.

Rolex wagies are sperging the FUCK OUT again

>>17148458
Once you buy a Dufour or Patek minute repeater and realize you can’t really go any higher.

>>17148458
BUy a rolex diver please please please pleas epleasep laseplaes

>>17148436
Only good GS are the ones that aren’t in the sports collection

>>17148459
to push the industry
why does ferrari make new cars?
even apple changes their phones up
anyway this thread is being shat up so this is my last comment on the matter

>>17148455
I'd like a cracker box like that for my wrist, without the watch movement obviously

>>17148468
>>17148468
Only being shat up because no one is discussing rolex

>>17148456
Rolex doesn't have the artisans to make such delicate and delicious dials.

>>17148446
shawty lookin like a snack

>>17148476
It takes real skill to make such a dial.

Non rolex discussion should be banned forever

>>17148459
Kinda don't like the maxi case tbqh.

>>17148480
Just like with porcelain and enamel, the dials need to be carefully baked at high temperatures by a skillful dial maker to achieve the perfect crunchiness and color.

>>17148468
>to push the industry
They're doing it with their quality control and the accuracy of their mass produced movements.
-2/+2s per day for a million automatic watches produced every year is absolutely insane. I don't think many people realize that.

>>17148486
A special coating is then applied to preserve the fragile texture of the rice cracked and to achieve the sheen that makes these dials special.

>>17147759
Post your favourite watch and genre of porn

>>17148489
tudors have the same time loss lol

>>17148492
>Rolex Submariner
>cuckolding

>>17148493
Tudor are announced as -4/+6s per day (COSC certified), which is already very good.

>>17148492
Rolex Oysterdate
BBC Gangbang

>>17148492
Tudor Pepsi
DDLG

>>17148492
grand seiko snowflake
gay shota

>>17148492
>omega speedy
>gay

>>17148492
Rolex Submarine
Old man cucks Young Man for money with wife watching
Self insert as young man

>>17148507
>DDLG
so kinky

>>17148492
Rolex GMT Master II 116710BLNR
Incest (gay)

>>17148524
Pretty sure I'm the only one who responded to this post who isn't falseflagging as a brand they dont like.

>amerilard posting hours
>thread is now about porn

>>17148531
>>17148531
Better than the rolexfags perpetually sperging out

>>17148155
$1k

>mfw i was retarded and managed to put my limited edition blue alpinist in the wash
>top part of bezel/case all dinged up now
That's what I get for buying meme releases from Seiko

>>17148532
Rolex Spergster Perpetual

>>17148585
>Rolex Spergmariner
>Seiko Spergdrive
>Tudor Spergbay
>Omega Spergmaster
>Tag Monacan sperg

>>17148423
>>17148348
Superb movement btw. My Tonda 1950 shares the same caliber.
You should try your luck and call the AD.

>>17148618
Ripoff rolex

>>17148490
Can be had in a Sesame and Crystal sugar flavoured cracker as well.

>>17148620
Rolex Seethester Perpetual

>>17148620
>Not one similarity with Rolex.
>Ripoff
Ok, numbnuts.

Since the Moonwatch and a GS Snowflake is about the same price, which would you pick. Heritage and history or that awesome spring drive?

>>17148658
If the snow frake was >=39mm I'd go for that in a heartbeat.

>>17148658
>Heritage and history
moonwatch is overdone and slightly cringey if you arent involved in aerospace

>>17148658
If the snow frake was <=39mm I'd go for that in a heartbeat.

>>17148658
moonwatch is the better watch, I'd have a hard time deciding between a moonwatch vs a 9sa5 watch though

>>17148658
I'd personally go for the Snowflake just because it wears better with a suit and the dial is cool. Love Speedy too, but I personally don't really care much about a watch being connected to some other people's achievements so the history doesn't tickle me as much.

You should check them out in person and see which speaks to you the most.

>>17148666
>moonwatch is the better watch
>major claim to fame is just astronaut larp
vs
>actually innovative and groundbreaking watch tech

>>17148658
I'm slowly, very slowly coming around to the speedy, but if I'm going to get a chrono, it would probably be a bi compax. In this hypothetical, it would be the GS for me.

>>17148671
it's the better watch because
1. Literally no one cares about Spring Drive
2. The moonwatch looks better
3. The moonwatch is more historically significant
4. The moonwatch is a better source of value
5. Omega is a better brand than Grand Seiko
6. It's a chronograph at a reasonable price
7. The Snowflake is a Reddit watch
8. The Snowflake has a hideous power reserve indicator
9. The Snowflake is made by Grand Seiko
10. The Snowflake is too big for what it is

>>17148658
>Spring Drive

>>17148678
Holy seethe and cope Batman. You got so enraged you didn't bother typing in a single argument. Did Speedy make your brain so smooth or were you like that before you got one?

>>17148678
>muhhh moon
>muhh nasa
>muh went to the moon!!!
>muh....SCIENCE and SPACE

>not a reddit watch

cringe larp

>swatch group garbage with parts made in china

>>17148678
goddamn soikos btfo

>>17148689
Jelly that your watch didn't go to the moon?

>>17148658
Imho, you should definitely go for the Speedy.

>>17148658
The Speedmaster is cool. Grand Seiko isn’t.

omega fans are so fragile

nobody cares about your shitty ""tool watch""" that can't even survive the pool

>>17148710
The pool? It went to the moon, Anon.

>>17148492

Ironically Kelly Wang aka mayli Wang worked at a CUNY for a while

>>17148712
yeah so did the bulova
>falling for marketing

>>17148710
stfu I took my speedmaster to the beach the other day and went swimming all day.

>>17148715
There were multiple bulovas that went to the moon even. The chrono dave scott wore, and a number of 214 tuning fork movements that were used as instrument clocks (like in the LM as well as various experimental equipment left on the moon).

Reminder that the chronograph Rolex sent to NASA was literally destroyed. Nice tool watch! Omega just can’t stop winning

>>17148720
Rolex damage control incoming in 3...2...1...

>>17148710
Holy shit at least clean it up you bastard

dare I?

>tudor BAD
>Omega BAD
>Tag BAD!

>>17148171
Fuck, I want a 36mm Lineage with all my soul

>>17148725
Rolex doesnt need damage control, whitebois stay seethin!

Is this the new Grand Seiko thread?

>wear two 46mm watches at the same time in your path

>>17148766
grrr.. thats not a rolex.. get out if you hate rolex..

Opinion on the SDGM003 "Grand Cocktail"?

>>17148678
Pretty much all of these can be boiled down to
>I base my decisions and opinions on the validation I receive from others

Except 10 that's fair desu

>>17148832
Pretty fantastic dial, would be better if the diameter was smaller though.

>>17148835
>NOOOOOOOOOO! YOU CAN'T JUST SAY WHICH IS BETTER IN YOUR OPINION WHEN THE GUY ASKED! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Love my GShock. Almost ruins all other watches for me.

>>17148860
nice rolex copy retard

>>17148860
I can see that, GShock is a perfect time piece. Outclasses Rolex in many ways,.

Reminder that a higher MSRP = higher quality watch. Patek is better than Rolex. Omega is better than Tudor.
>muh counterexample
The exception that proves the rule. Cope all you want.

Just ordered this and I want a good strap to compliment it, any ideas of what I should get?

>>17148864
This post smells like poop and seethe

>>17148865
Rolex is better than patek get out get out get out you quasi luxury tard get out right now please get out now please get out we dont want you here we dont want anti rolex people here get out now

Fuck I missed the latest Bunkyo Tokyo preorders

>>17148867
Rainbow NATO

>>17148867
Sel that piece of junk and buy a Rolex!

>>17148878
>Look Mom I have the same Rolex(tm) as everyone else!

>>17148873
Not too late to get on the wait list for a rolex hahahah
>>17148882
cope and seeeeeeeethe hehehehe

>>17148867
Where did you get this?

any casio chads here?

>>17148867

>>17148887
probably at some junker shop when he really wants a rolex
>>17148899
casio is a rolex cope

>>17148887
Etsy from 1917BackInUSSR1991
>>17148904
Lol nice, where did you even find that picture?
And yeah the strap works, I don't even remember seeing it in the photos.
Wish the blue was a little lighter though

>>17148899
Words really can’t describe the contempt I feel towards these people.

>>17148919
>where did you even find that picture?
I'm assuming, from where you bought the watch. Seeing as the pic you posted was there also.

>>17148899

>>17147987
anyone? :(

>>17148928
Yup, I didn't realize you could preview the item details on a sold item.
I thought you had the picture saved already or something

>>17147987
I don't know your taste, only you do. Google watch straps and find something you like.

>>17148931
black is a neutral colour so lots of things can go with it
maybe a camel or burgundy to liven it up

>>17148929
Disgusting rolex rip off

>>17148939
I agree rolexbro!
Rolex 4 lyf!

>>17148939
Based rep Rolex anon.

>>17148168
>Mr Jones Watches were on a giant sale last month for 15 year in business sale
>have to wait another 15 years for something that feels like a toy or a 45mm to be priced reasonably for its build

>>17149001
sheeet
how much was the discounts?

>>17149002
30 to 60% off

Rolex can't afford to use 316l/ 18-10 /4A steel lol

I'm one step away from getting a GS over an Rolex.
Someone convince me.

>>17148865
The S stands for suggestion. If you're not paying under MSRP you are getting screwed.

>>17149005
:(
I had always wanted the tiger one

>>17149017
save your money, don't buy anything

>>17149017
whats the use of money if you aren't using it to make yourself happy

>>17149023
Hoarding it so you have more than other people makes me happy.

>>17149021
I want them to release the different kings and queens.

>>17147887
whats the model?

>>17149019
>I'm getting screwed if I buy a Daytona at MSRP lol
lmao

>>17149017
Grand Seiko Spring Drive has an accuracy of +/- 1 second per day which is twice as precise as the best Rolex Superlative Chronometer, more precise than a METAS certified Master Chronometer, and numerous times more accurate than a COSC certified Chronometer.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdVKkHV0FVw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdVKkHV0FVw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdVKkHV0FVw

NEW WAIFUNEW WAIFUNEW WAIFUNEW WAIFUNEW WAIFUNEW WAIFUNEW WAIFUNEW WAIFGNEW WAIFU

>>17149037
buying a turdo right now

>>17149037
NO ARM HAIR, NO THANKS.

Torn between this gold dial Seiko Speedtimer or the classic white panda one. What do you all think? Does the panda look too much like a Daytona rip off?

>>17149029
Dial says 66-9880, caseback and internet says 66-9990.

>>17149017
Get the GS.

>>17149017
That would be a big mistake.

>>17149017
get the GS

>>17149045
Looks better than a Daytona desu

>>17149055
obviously

>>17149055
Next time just say you can’t afford a Rolex.

>>17149037
she looked much better in the thumbnail... closed.

>>17147898
go for it

>>17149058
Cope and seethe Rolexfag

>>17149057
>cosmograph is a term made up by Rolex for watches with a calendar and moon phase function
>the Daytona has neither of these
>keep calling it the cosmograph
Rolex are probably the biggest shysters in the industry

>>17149036
yes anon. we all know you need that for your busy life

this motorcycle accident sea-dweller is the sickest rolex ive ever seen

>>17149075
It saved his life

fuck date windows
good night

>>17149080
Because who needs to know the date when you never leave the basement amirite?

>>17149079
how

according to the guide my ideal size for a watch is 36 - 38 mm..
i hate being a wristlet.

>>17149090
Rolex

>>17149100
According to the guide I'm a 50/52

>>17149100
mines like 34-36
oh well
vintages it is

>>17149023
Money is for health and safety. Happiness comes from within like a fart.

yachtmaster

>>17148012
this one

>>17149036
And is also fucking beautiful. I'm poor so I can't afford neither but I think the well executed GSs look much better than Rolexes

>>17149036
Because it's quartz. Quarts movements are more accurate by nature.

>>17149103
damn crazy

>>17149017

new
whenever

>>17149143
>>17149143
>>17149143

>>17147905
I’ve looking to omega vintage sector dials, and I’ve found those designs to be very balanced and exquisite in terms of simplicity. But Im not playing the omega vintage game because you can be scammed very easily.

The only brands to execute this kind of design (full crosshair) are Longines and baltic.

The longines is well proportioned but the small seconds are the problem for me.

The baltic is based on a cheap miyota so fuck that shit.

Are there any other options in the market?

>>17149057
>devolution
Ftfy

I really like how the older daytona models had the tachymeter scale go past 60 and put the text at 3. Are there any other chronos that do/did this?

>>17148389
Vostoks fags are in the beach enjoying our 200m of water resistance

>>17148002
>oce
>anus
bros...