/fa/ - Fashion

>>17125757
When are they going to make a quartz version in steel that I can afford?

>>17125751
I bet I would get so much bussy wearing that watch

I have the coolest watch

Posting the undeniable, objectively factual chart.
Cope, if you must (and you will).

Which one?

Posting, as required by the thread.

>>17125757
>>17125751
do they still make these? I can't find them online and they look exactly like what I want

>>17125762
Just get a steel quartz/solar Tank. They're like 2,5k€.

>>17125771
>>17125762
Cope watch.

>>17125770
They're from the Cartier Privé collection.
Around 30k€.

>>17125768
>F-E
how do you put gas in your watch?

Do these have a proper name? Tilted dials? Crooked? Diagonal? Hard to find watches like this that are not in luxury level.

Here's 2 views of my casio wave ceptor. Thoughts?

are the vintage rolex perpetual oysters worth buying to start off my vintage collection?

>>17125774
Guess it's time for another savings account.... Or to just get an actual "chinoise" watch

>>17125764
*mogs you casually*

>>17125786
Every serious watch collections should have at least one Rolex.
Get a vintage Explorer or DJ.

>>17125786
Not at today's prices.

>>17125792
>All collections must include the popular things.

Is this 40mm watch too big for a 6.5" wristlet?

>>17125800
No, either all Seikos wear really small or Seiko has a weird way of measuring their watches' size.

>>17125793
2000 aint good?

>>17125782
It's ok, i don't like that piece of plastic between the bracelet and case.

>>17125769
finally someone posting the original without their favorite brands edited out

>>17125769
kek this one time I took this pic then randomly moved the brands around without even looking at them and I got a bunch of seething (you)s including multiple who accused me of being an X brand shitter fanboy. good times

>>17125798
If you have an interest in vintage watches, Rolex is pretty much inevitable. They've produced millions of watches, came up with a shit ton of innovations, and have arguably the most iconic designs.

>>17125768
ID on left one ?

>>17125787
Based collection.

>>17125816
Yes and no. I mean, Rolex is the biggest, most popular brand, so everyone dabbles. Some people become full-on fanboys, others migrate to other brands or other styles.

But the stupid part is that absurd "every serious collection" gatekeeping bullshit.
>Every """serious""" collection needs
>A Rolex DJ
>An Omega Speedmaster Pro
>A Cartier Tank
>A G-Shock
>etc...
Sure, you'll have a collection that gets plenty of upvotes on r*dd*t, but it will be completely soulless.

Someone whose collection is focused on JLC complications or vintage Patek chronographs will have an extremely serious collection even if it doesn't tick the watch community hivemind's boxes.

>be me, proud Rolex owner
>open Rolex instagram page
>read hundreds comments of seething no-Rolex owners
>take a look at my Rolex
>feelsgoodman.jpg

>>17125840
that model sucks dick looks like an invicta

>>17125838
>popular = bad
I can't believe you said something so controversial yet so brave

Can you fine gentlemen help me ID this watch?

>>17125843
ladie's omega quartz watch

>>17125843
It's an Omega

>>17125838
Rolex is unique when it comes to vintage. For a very long time they were simply the most innovative and best watches on the planet.
>first waterproof case
>first self-winding movement
>first date complication on a wrist watch
>first GMT function
>first helium escape valve
I mean you can argue all you want but there is a reason why most known watch collectors and watch makers own (several) Rolex.

>>17125853
You've got to be trolling.

>>17125855
If you don't own a Rolex, you're not a watch collector. You're a poorfag collecting literal garbage.

>>17125853
Some of that is only half true. There was a lot of marketing even back then. Vintage rollies are fucking cool though

>>17125821
SSC813

>>17125847
>>17125848
Was hoping for a model number

>>17125853
What's your opinion on Philippe Dufour's mutt daughter?

>>17125782
Only 2 views. That’s sad I’m giving you a (You) and a upboat.

>>17125853
>first waterproof case
Pettit pocket watch of 1851
>first self-winding movement
In pocket watches, Perrelet, 1777. In wrist watches, Harwood, 1929
>first date complication on a wrist watch
A. Hammerly, 1915
>first GMT function
In the Rolex format, sure, but Glycine invented the first watch that could track two timezones with the Airman in 1952
>first helium escape valve
The Doxa Sub 300T Conquistador in 1969

>>17125865
bros...

>>17125858
Rolex has always been very much like Apple. They take other people's ideas and refine them in a way that appeals to the mass market. They don't come up with their own ideas.

>>17125869
literal cope. Next time just say you can't afford a Rolex.

>>17125874
>No counterargument.
I accept your concession.

picrel, nice try.

>>17125875
>two cope watches

>>17125880
>He immediately had to reply

>>17125875
Couldn't afford a Daytona?

>>17125883
>you immediately had to reply
Keep seething poorfag.

>>17125884
At MSRP? Easily. At gray market? No, I'd never pay that much for a mass market watch. Though, with prices currently cratering, who knows?

>>17125751
Which one /fa/ggots?

>>17125888
>At gray market? No
Got it, so you can't afford a non-cope Rolex.

>>17125869
>Pettit pocket watch of 1851
>In pocket watches, Perrelet, 1777. In wrist watches, Harwood, 1929
who cares about fucking pocket watches...
>A. Hammerly, 1915
You fail to mention it was a patent, and not an actual watch. Rolex is the brand that made it possible.
>In the Rolex format, sure
The only format that is used nowadays in mechanical watches
>The Doxa Sub 300T Conquistador in 1969
Rolex and Doxa share the same patent, they worked on the helium valve together

Nice nitpicking though.

ITT: Anon posts a Rolex and all the poorfags start flailing, Episode 285.

>>17125865
That video has him wearing a tiny dress watch with his daughter

>>17125890
Neither. Too busy

>>17125875
if you buy a couple more watches like that maybe your AD will let you buy a GMT.

>>17125895
Every time.

>>17125895
I like making fun of this guy whenever he posts because he feels the need to autistically defend his choices against shitposters 100% of the time. It's a pretty good peek into the crippling insecurity that drives Rolex buyers.

>>17125895
You gotta love it.

Most times, I actually do come for talk about watches, but sometimes, you just need to make the poorfags get off their asses and move some goalposts. :^)

Is a rectangular watch the ultimate cope?

>>17125905
No.one believes that's real fyi

>>17125903
>the crippling insecurity that drives Rolex buyers.
what about people like you on the waiting list? does the insecurity come after you get the call?

>>17125905
based alpha

>>17125910
I don't buy Rolex because I'm smart enough to realize they're not worth the hassle.

>>17125908
>Shit...it's...uh, uh...it's FAKE! Yeah, that'll get 'im.
Whatever gets you through your day, sweaty.

>>17125912
>My AD was honest with me and told me there is no waiting list, I was simply never going to get to buy a Rolex.

Rolexes from China are like 25 bucks and there's barely any difference

>>17125913
Box papers receipt you know the drill

>>17125897
Pretend you're an engineer who likes slide rules, works in aerospace, and has a physics PhD and a 9" cock.

>>17125913
Lmao the people trolling about rolex are also the people seething at Rolex. What a life

/wt/ once again proving that you're all a bunch of insecure retards. Wear whatever the fuck you want. Jesus Christ you niggers are insufferable.

>>17125917
That's the trick, though, isn't it?
Dress well, have a good job, drive a good car, and no one will ever question whether your watch is fake or not.
Meanwhile, the Shift Manager at McDonalds saves and saves and finally gets the call and no one believes that his watch isn't fake.

>>17125905
If this is real you should sell it immediately and buy a watch that is actually worth that amount of money. Rolex prices are unironically going to crater next year with the recession and their factory expansion coming online.

>>17125908
>cyclops zooming seems correct
>ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX on the rehaut looks clean
>hands and markers have the right proportions
It is real. An easy way to make sure it's real would be to look at the crown on the clasp. Rolex uses a laser carving machine while chinks use a mold.
Fake Rolex are super easy to spot by the way. Don't believe youtubers who tell you otherwise just to make some views.

>>17125932
>Rolex prices are unironically going to crater next year with the recession and their factory expansion coming online.
Luxury is immune to recession.

>>17125928
Don't tell what to do you double nigger
>>17125933
Too many of you niggers have bragged about posting your faux watches for me to believe anything unless proven otherwise. It's also the worst GMT. Not impressed.

>>17125936
>Luxury is immune to recession.
The grey and used watch markets do not work like that.

>>17125932
I bought it at MSRP and this is my favorite watch. I'll just keep it.

>>17125940
MSRP from chingchongtime . com?

>>17125933
>Fake Rolex are super easy to spot by the way.
This. In a dark restaurant from across the room, no. But in well lit pictures? It's a piece of cake.

>>17125936
nothing luxurious about the professional Rolex flippers that make up half of chrono24 that are currently losing their ass on falling prices

>>17125869
That anon got absolutely BTFO'd
Based
lol, lmao even

>>17125775
You dip it in some diesel oil

>>17125853
>>17125856
>>17125874
>>17125880
>>17125884
>>17125887
>>17125891
I feel sorry for you anon.

>>17125951
Luxurious? No.
Hilarious? Definitely.

tick tock rolex fags

>>17125869
Rolexsisters...

>>17125961
3080 here we come

>>17125939
>Too many of you niggers have bragged about posting your faux watches for me to believe anything unless proven otherwise. It's also the worst GMT. Not impressed.
Pic related is a $600 fake GMT.
Look at the minute hand. It's flat. Now look at anon's picture and see how the minute hand is slightly curved.
The ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX writing on the rehaut is also completely wrong (the R at 11 and the X at 1 are in the wrong position).
I'm 100% sure his Rolex is real. I also think it's a great watch even though I prefer the Pepsi or the Rootbeer. Good for him.

>>17125782
It's a fucking Casio what do you want us to say

>>17125972
Casio?

>>17125970
forgot pic

>>17125972
does it wear too large?

Talk me out of it bro’s. You can get a 1k discount on gray market. The bezel rotates and it has a date but the crown is kind of chintzy

>>17125970
>The ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX writing on the rehaut is also completely wrong (the R at 11 and the X at 1 are in the wrong position).
What do you mean?

>>17125865
>>17125870
All she has to do is copy Philippe's finishing. She'll do fine.

>>17125905
the Pepsi was sold out huh?

>>17125980
Ugly

>>17125932
>Rolex prices are unironically going to crater next year
people have been saying this for the last 10 years

>>17125990
except it has already started, the world is entering a global recession, and Rolex is going to produce 25% more movements starting 2023

>>17125951
>the professional Rolex flippers that make up half of chrono24 that are currently losing their ass on falling prices
Yeah Im sure they will go broke selling watches for only 30k that they paid 12k for

>>17125890
Right

>>17125970
Still not my cup of tea.
>>17125994
You don't stay in business sitting on inventory.

>>17125992
now zoom out a bit
going down from an all time high to 3x MSRP

About the grey market thing, you niggers are completely missing the point...

Flippers have hoarded hundreds of Rolex they bought at MRSP price (most of the time they didn't even pay VAT)
For example, a GMT Master II retail price is 10k VAT included. Flippers buy them at 8k. Currently selling them at 25k (29k in april, this was the top). If you think flippers are getting their ass busted at that price, you're an idiot.

Here's what's gonna happen
>price will continue to drop because flippers need to sell their stock
>a GMT Master II on the grey will probably go back to its pre-COVID price, ie around 18k
>Rolex will still struggle to produce enough of their most sought after models
>waiting lists will still be a thing, but they will be shorter
>flippers will keep on making huge bucks on Chrono24

>>17126005
So you believe there is a grand conspiracy wherein the Rolex ADs are pre-allocating virtually all of their desirable stock to flippers who are paying below MSRP for these pieces? Am I reading this post correctly?

>>17125980
Bezel is too wide.

>>17126005

>>17126007
>flipper pay MSRP minus VAT (it's very easy to do if the flipper is a registered company)
>flipper sell the watch on C24 and give back a % of the sale to the AD
Everyone's happy, the flipper and the AD.
How do you think a flipper like this one has access to so many brand new Rolex?
https://steinermaastricht.nl

citizen nb1050 or nb1060?

stupid ass thread

>>17126030
nb1060 all the way my man

>>17126033

>>17125940
Congrats anon. Reminds me of any time I’ve ever posted my Eames chair. Everyone just assumes it is a replica.

Is he wearing a G-Shock, lads?

>>17125890
Right is more versatile with fits and it looks better imo

>>17126022
This is ridiculous. I'm sure it happens in a few places, but it's literally racketeering. You'd have to be a complete fucking retard to be an AD and engage in this when Rolex is your biggest cashcow.

>>17125961
i don't care i'm never selling

>>17125814
I think I will do that next time. I'll make sure to put rolex some place shitty though, it will make all the kids too poor to afford a watch go mad with rage.

>>17126086
No one wants a used rep anyway

Thoughts??

>>17126090
based

>>17126088
how about a used rape *rapes you*

Suggest me my first and hopefully last luxury watch
Budget - around $4k
Watch type - will be worn with a business suit
Movement type - preferably automatic
Wrist size - 7 inches

>>17125751
Posted last thread but id like more suggestions. Schizocore watches?

>>17126103
You're not a schizo.

>>17126101
rolex oyster perpetual or a day date if you want to spend a little bit more

>>17126101
Either double the budget and get Rolex OP34/36 or a Datejust 36.
Or if that budget is firm get the nicest Omega that still fits under a cuff you can afford. The midsize Seamaster (used) would still work. Unless you actually want a dress watch in which case...yikes.

>>17126106
Answer the question

>>17126101
SBGW231

>>17126103
replica rolexes

>>17126110
Ask the voices in your head then and not us.

>>17126103
any three watches, better if they're completely different from one another, worn on the same wrist, and set to wildly different dates and times.

>>17125869
I aspire to this level of autism

>>17126087
do it, it's fun

>>17125919
just get a normal watch and an E6B then, that watch looks horrendous.

>>17126201
kekked

Should I buy it? Fits me good.

What's the difference between 80.111, 80.611 and 80.811 movements?

the only real list
stop posting this shit

>>17126236
https://googlethatforyou.com?q=powermatic%2080%20caliber

have you exhausted the options for other brands like citizen, seiko and the like?

>>17126101
Black Bay 58

>>17126103
Some black cheap casio/gshock

>>17125865
she seems pretty cool glad to see her carrying on the legacy

which company makes the best after market leather straps with a deployant clasp?

>>17126295
longines

Watch of the bad guy with white hair on Stranger Things. Any insight on what this could be?

>>17125765
Do you ever go out? Do stuff? It's been months since I last checked this watches circlejerk yet you're still here on every thread. Admirable dedication

>>17126090
Aqua green 1st gen kamasu, Based. I was really tempted buying one, but I got a 1st gen pepsi mako so...

Looking to spend $200 on a field watch with quartz movement.
Having the date would be nice.
I would prefer a leather strap.
I have 6” child wrist with skeleton fingers.

This is my first watch so I’m open to reasonable suggestions.

>>17126336
Don't get anything bigger than 37mm. This citizen gets recommended a lot here

>>17126355
>This citizen gets recommended a lot here

into the trash it goes

>>17126336
>>17126355
But I have to say I find the citizen very dull. If you can live with no date there's this aliexpress shitter I really like. It has sapphire + already comes on a leather strap

>>17126336
Citizen Garrison. You’ll have to get an aftermarket leather strap. Most field watches don’t come on leather and your options are limited with your budget.

*saves Grand Seiko*

>>17126359
>Criticizes
>Doesn't suggest an alternative
Fuck off

what watch do i wear for the voices not in my head

>>17125895
It's true
I've never owned a Rolex and I'll probably never own one but I acknowledge it's a Grail, unlike Seiko trash and all the other shit that's peddled in here trying to convince themselves their choice of the smart choice like some comment section on Amazon under Seiko watches

>>17125893
So BASED all these poorfags pretend that didn't see it

>>17126310
seikomatic something?

>>17126369
Oh interesting, they decided to rotate the movement back to the right position

>>17125769
Unironically why is Oceanus pictured here as a cope?

>>17126192
Nah I'm gonna get the one on the right and wear it when I fist your sister.

>>17126463
this wasn't even a funny shitpost man. try harder next time, I'll bet you didn't even laugh when making this post.

>>17125778
Typically "Driving" watches, but there's not too too much out there for them. I'd argue the most well known watch to do it is pretty decently in the luxury bracket though

>>17126505
That’s my grail. I’m 40k until I reach my goal.

>>17125840
Unironically the least appealing watch on the planet

>>17125862
Fuck you

>>17125786
Where should I look for authentic vintage watches?

i
only
buy
new
watches
with
papers
and
box
without
discounts

Should I?

>>17126566
yes

>>17125865
i'd fuck her over the workbench in front of all the watchfaces

>>17126560
good for you
keep them in their boxes like funko pops

>>17126566
absolutely, it has the very rare "piss and shit" dial which is loved by collectors

>>17126566
looks like complete shit, go for it

>>17126369
Their best diver so far, just wish they’d give up on the retarded „it’s a tool so we have to make it 45mm“-stance &maybe even do it in Titanium

>>17125800
No 40 non-bezel watch is fine on a 6.5 wrist. Would never go much over 40 though. If you have a 7 inch wrist then you can go up to 42 on a non-bezel.

>>17126625
That's just how Japanese people like their watches, I guess. Chunky watches are popular over there.

>>17125840
The Rolex dealer at my city has some (or at least two on display) and I think they're shit ugly. It's Saudi prince tier taste.

>Spring Drive!!!!!!!!

>>17126236
Certina is ok, but for that price range you could probably just get a higher quality Longines dive watch for a little bit more.

Hydroconquest for 1325: https://www.longines.com/en-us/watch-hydroconquest-l3-742-4-56-6

Hamilton is also in the same price price range of Certina though I like their quality more: https://www.hamiltonwatch.com/en-int/filter-by/automatic-watches.html?hamilton_movement=5504&hamilton_water_resistance=5622_5621

Would it be worth paying to fix a mid 80s Seiko 5 Automatic like pic related? My father got it in Switzerland sometime in the late 80s but broke it somehow in the late 90s.

>>17126647
It will probably cost a couple hundred dollars if you can find a good professional watch repair guy. Only shell out if you really love the watch and plan to wear it regularly.

>>17125786
Yes. Pay a little more for a good example.

>>17126007
He's a schizo who doesn't realize AD's exist to create a customer roll not middle eastern flipper scum. Many of these places have other jewelry they want to sell you too. They want customers.

>>17125792
No. Every serious collection (what even is that) needs whatever you like and if that's some chromed commie shitter that's alright.

>>17126648
Damn that much? I'll have to really think about it I guess. Something is fucked up inside since the whole face and movement spins freely inside the case, I've never seen anything like it before.

>>17126101
Stretch your budget a little bit and get on the list for a 34mm rolex. Won't take long, they're not as popular. You won't need anything else ever again and if you have it serviced every fifteen years for a couple hundred bucks you'll be ok for life.

>>17126656
You're not allowed to collect what I don't like! /s

>>17126669
>/s
Get the fuck off this website.

>>17126656
You sound like some leftist faggot, kys

>>17126669
>>17126676
Imagine getting this mad about someone liking something. Settle down autismo.

>>17126280
Assuming I get what you're implying, are you the same retarded autist who keeps posting about how Powermatic movements are not good, but refuses to provide any proof whatsoever?

>>17126647
Depends on where you live and what's wrong with it. It would probably be easier to source a used watch that has the same movement and just swap it.

>>17126662
It's probably just a few screws that secure the movement to the case got undone.

>>17126717
Neat little watch.

>>17126458
>Unironically why is Oceanus pictured here as a cope?
Because it's "Can't afford an MR-G?" or "Can't afford an Grand Seiko?"

>>17126692
not at all, i am encouraging him to consider all his options and do his research

>>17126369
Jesus… it’s as if the better it gets with movements, materials, cases and finishing, the worse it gets with dials and overall design. This watch would work so much better with any prospex or even some Seiko 5 dials.

>>17126458
They are too good of watches and it makes people here upset. You see, casios and g shock for example are very functional, but they don't look very good, and that is why they are accepted: they do not threaten the swiss watch owner's ego, who can still think "well it might cost $200, but it looks like shit", and be relatively at peace. But with Oceanus they managed to make something extremely funcional and also very beautiful, so they are in for some hate from people who bought something that appers to be almost objectively inferior

>>17126757
>MR-G
Chunky and too casual
>Grand Seiko
Not solar

Try again

>>17126787
Lol, that's some top-level coping right there.

Can someone help me id this watch?
>>17126813
>>17126820
I posted it in the old thread. Why did you /fa/gs start a new thread before hitting the bump limit?

>see a Rolex
Probably fake what a poser
>see a Casio
Nice watch bro

I'm thinking of picking up this Seiko SRPG35 shown in the pic. Looking for a budget field mechanical watch and this seems to fit the bill quite well. Reviews I've read seem to generally applause this piece aside from the price, which has dipped a year after its release. Thoughts?

>>17126835
>see a Rolex
>Probably fake what a poser
I post a fake every now and then just to flex and nobody can ever tell.

>>17125764
Nice. I have the matte black one, I posted it a couple of threads ago. Fantastic watches.

Lads what's a nice more simplistic vintage clock? I don't like the fancy big ones that are so thick that you could smash a glass with them if you threw them hard enough.

>>17125841
>looks like an invicta

poorfag here.. should i get an oris haha..

>>17126868
If you're poor, get a Rolex.

>>17126840
same, i was looking at the SRPG29 or SRPG39 though. i'm still on the fence because of the size, i would have preferred it with a smaller case and shorter lug to lug

>>17126566
>watch case, crown and bezel polished to total shit
>hands obviously new and not original
>"rolex" field watch with 24hr markers..?

yes please go buy that and get scammed
dumbass

give me 3 reasons why i shouldnt buy this kino piece

>>17126935
I like it, quite intricate

>>17126840
This one's nice too

Day date is so practical bros

>>17126935
1) It's cheap and deep down you and anyone you show it will know that and you'll go off it in a year.

2) chink shite.

3) like myself if your considering this watch then you obviously have to save for these things... If you don't buy this and keep saving in 6 months you can get to the £500+ range and having something you'll genuinely cherish and be able to show off.

>>17126935
Screws on the dial
Multiple dates visible
Dead space under moon phase

>barely released
>already sold out
bros...

>>17126942
>moon phase
It's not even a moon phase but just a glorified 24-hour subdial.

I need a perpetual calendar.

>>17126825
It's most probably fake. All Seikos have a reference number on the bottom of the dial. The movement looks off as well.

>>17126949
pure sovl

>>17126949
i love perpetual calendars but i dislike non-window date indicators

>>17126853
>>17126853
>>17126853
>>17126853
plz reply

Is a steel bracelet a poor choice for someone who sweats like a pig? Or is it fine

Is this the best most soulful gshock?

>>17126971
A dress watch. Seiko or Omega could fit your bill.

>>17126978
>soulful
>black

no

i hate black watches and anons who buy nothing but black (or white) watches. reeks of no imagination and being too scared to actually enjoy some colour. Humans can see colour for a reason. When its a affordable watch like a gshock there is literally no reason not to.

>>17126972
Lose weight friendo

>>17126972
it's literally the only sensible option
leather and sweat don't mix too well
nato and sweat is even more disgusting, but you could easily wash it frequently
rubber is rubber

>>17126972
It's fine but you can also go for a tropical strap which may or may not be better for you.

>>17126369
That dial

>>17125865
Looks like she waxes her arms, legs, and pits, so no thank you.

>>17126369
It's really interesting that this watch is far superior in power reserve, accuracy, and finishing to a Rolex submariner at essentially the same price yet their insistence on making their dive watches so huge means almost no one will buy it.

>>17126369
G Shock retard huge

>>17126972
Stainless steel is very heavy. More weight = more pressure = less respiration = more sweat
Aim for something light, titanium is your friend (or rubber if it fits the style)

>Vacheron Copestantin
>Copedemars Piguet
>A. Lange & Cöpe
>Jaeger Lecope
>H. Cope & Cie
>Copard
>Copemega
>Grand Seicope
COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE

>>17127059
Anything that is not a platinum DayDate is a Copelex.

>>17126978
no

>>17127063

>>17127059
>all those old white men names

we need more POC representation in the world of watches.

>>17127063
This is quite possibly the ugliest watch I’ve had the displeasure of seeing.

>>17127059
hnnng

>>17127068
Don't worry anon, Philippe Dufour's mutt daughter is the future of watchmaking.

>>17127066
>>17127074
its called soul, sweatie

Kikou Ibe

>>17126978
the most reddit

>>17127068
>Dashawn Jamar - est. 1887

>>17127079
Is so espensive

>>17127093
https://www.chrono24.com/vacheronconstantin/vacheron-constantin-traditionnelle--id24221946.htm

>>17127084
why is he so smug?

>>17127060
I’m getting a Tudor Glamour DayDate specifically to cope with the fact I can’t get a rolex DayDate

>>17127094
Actually not half bad for Vacheron Constantin

>>17127094
>no box or papers
>Chinese
>"professional dealer"
>Chinese
>no box or papers
>pre-owned
>escrow unavailable
>return policy determined by dealer
Fucking KEK. What a great deal anon. Buy it now!!!

>>17126990
danke!

Thoughts on this watch?
Biggest downside I can find is that it'd be hard to find a good replacement strap that fits the look of this watch if the stock one ends up being uncomfortable.

>>17127101
I thought it was shady also. Most I've seen have traded at near retail level

Just copped this. What'chu think about it?

>>17127094
this has more red flags than any other listing I've ever seen on Chrono24, unironically.

>>17127108
Rolex cope

>>17127108
At least it's not BLACK the most uninspired and least playful choice

>>17125865
>og white boy summer member
>wears modern rolex
Extremely based, makes all of the weebs muh japan nerds seethe

>>17126995
>That watch's colors
Hang yourself, faggot

>>17127108
Swap out the band for alligator leather and you’re set.

>>17126369
Would be a really excellent luxury diver if only it was far smaller.

>>17127059
>Copetek Philippe
>Copemigiani
>Copeguet
>Copetizen
>Copesio
>FP Cope
>Coperum
>Copiel Roth
>Gerald Copeta
>Girard Perrecope
>Copex
>IWCope
>Coperai
>Coporis
>Copetron
Kek This is so fun.

>be me
>bought a Rolex thinking I would finally be done with watches
>actually more obsessed than ever
>on the verge of taking a loan to buy a GMT Master II
how do I stop? I don't want to ruin my life over watches.

So far from my research on watches it seems that seiko and casio are the best brands that do not cost a fortune. Somewhat correct? I know narrowing it down to two brands is a bit reductive but when there's so many and you just need to establish a consensus.

>>17127084
Copekou Ibe

>>17127128
Correct

>>17127128
Don't forget Citizen

>>17127128
That's mostly correct.
Orient, Citizen, Timex, and Swatch also have some decent cheap watches. There's also bad Casio and Seiko watches, at least compared to some of their better watches.

>>17127127
>on the verge of taking a loan to buy a GMT Master II
Just don't do it.

>>17127127
>on the verge of taking a loan to buy a GMT Master II
The average Rolex owner, everyone.

>>17127127
You will buy that GMT. The question is how do you soften the fall?

>>17127127
Get into shitter watches like me.

>>17127063
6900 is tasteful but nothing beats the 5600 aesthetics.

damn this is the most beautiful watch i have ever seen. shame it's more expensive than comfortable for me.

>>17127104
Ref? How big is it?

>>17127167
Good taste, Anon. For me it's the 1815 Up/Down

>>17127127
same
had 15k in my bank but spent 12k on a rolex because of these threads
i am finished

>>17127176
If you're actually serious, it's no big deal. You can turn around and probably sell the Rolex for about what you paid whenever you want. I still wouldn't recommend people spend such a large percentage of their money on a Rolex, but they seem to be a pretty safe place to store money if the last few years are anything to go by.

>>17127127
>average rolex retard living above his means
Look at this fucking moron and laugh

I'm on my local ADs list for a Rolex Explorer. I don't really expect anything to come form this, but if they call me do I actually buy it?

>>17127182
Yeah. If you end up not liking it just sell it, you won't lose anything.

>>17127127
Those is why you buy a fake Rolex first

>>17127182
yes
take a loan if you need to

>>17127185
That's what I thought but I have never gone through the process of selling a watch. Wouldnt it be a hard sell coming from some random dude and selling to some commercial seller you probably lose a lot of money

any idea about pic related? worth fixing?

>>17127194
That's true for the vast majority of watches, but the Rolex market is a totally different beast.

>>17127176
Holy fuck this is stupid

>>17127190
hows my fake rolex

>>17127195
you can replace the battery and see if it runs
if it does, you can replace the crystal
otherwise its not worth fixing unless it has some sentimental value to you

>>17125751
odd request, does anyone know of a digital watch that has a random number generator and has a tally function in it? Don't want a smart watch.

>>17127197
This is cringe kino

>>17127210
hmm, maybe a better question that solves these things is off there is a digital watch with a graphing calculator function...

>>17127197
great way to determine if someone is looking at you a little TOO closely.

>>17127127
>tfw have a rolex
>tfw just want to buy chinese shitters because they look quirky

>>17127171
filename

>>17127197
>submarinara

NEW THREAD WHEN?

>>17126336
If you're willing to go up to $400 you could get the one of the OG field watches, mechanical or quartz

>>17127296
Why not just get an IWC or some other real field/pilot watch? Also what are you even going to wear those with, a motorcycle jacket?

>>17127269
nigger
>>17127310
>>17127310
>>17127310
>>17127310
>>17127310

>>17127171
SUR373, 40.2mm diameter 8.4mm thickness 47.0mm lug to lug. There's some options in the same line that I like the look of better such as the 371, 375, and 377. But I found a deal on this one for €170.

>>17127305
He asked for a field watch I gave him one
Hamilton has as more heritage in the area than most and they aren't way out of his budget

>>17127321
Should've just given him a $150 G-Shock then.

>>17127349
If that's the aesthetic he wants then I'm sure he would have gotten a g shock already
Plus he's a wristlet so maybe not a great choice

>>17127198
Fuck you guys I can’t wait to see this watch in person