/fa/ - Fashion

>>17124112
They had to ruin it with the date window

>>17124114
the retard chart poster isnt posting it anymore so now i have to

>>17124112
I fucking love the parmigiani. I think if I were a richfag I'd get this instead of VC/AP/PP.

>>17124120
>cant afford an RM in his imaginary richfag life
yikes

>>17124117
At least it's colour matched

>>17124120
I wouldnt get a PF as I find them rather plain (except that one chrono) but I get you, VC/AP/PP do almost nothing for me. If I were turbo rich I'd either buy a Laurent Ferrier or a H. Moser (Streamliner).

>>17124127
I don't get Moser. It's trolling in the form of watchmaking, It's like pic related.

Getting a grand seiko. Should I get an
Sbgw 283, 277, 275? I’m a fan of all 3 color ways but I can only afford one.

>>17124129
They have some meme watches, but most of them are very conservative.
I love the Streamliner. I think it's the only integrated bracelet watch that won't look dated in a few years. It's unique.

>>17124112
>>17124117

>>17124131
283 because it's the only one available?
>>17124134
Are they really that good?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SRpwbtxjKUQ&t=1007s

>>17124143
Oh, have the others sold out already? A bit disappointing to hear but at the end of the end of the day there’s a reason I gave myself multiple choices.

>>17124151
Sbgw231 too plain for you?

>>17124163
That is the case. This is going to be my first “higher end” watch, and I want something a bit fun. Right now my nicest watch is a seiko coutura, which I’ve decided is slightly too gaudy.

>>17124170
I still wear it daily as I’m a fan of its accuracy but it’s a bit too flashy and I’m not a fan of the attention it receives. The odd compliment is nice to receive but I do not appreciate good for nothings eyeing it.

Who's the best watch youtuber and why is it my nigga Bark and Jack?

>>17124186
It's Tim Mosso of course, but Bark and Jack is much less irritating than almost everyone else.

>>17124190
One day I WILL email tmosso@thewatchbox.com and ask for purchase and pricing details, one day...

What would you lads’ preferred replacement band for a Casio MDV106 be? It’s a nice watch for the price, the body looks real smart but the stock vinyl band is poop and I can’t make up my mind on what I’d replace it with

>>17124190
>Tim Mosso
I can't stand the way he's talking

>>17124178
Looks like any other 150 seiko

>>17124207
I personally put mine on a cheap ass single pass nylon strap. Looks good and is way more comfy than the stock one. I also recently got some marine nacionale style elastic straps for some of my other watches, and I highly recommend giving them a go. They're infinitely adjustable and also very comfy, especially if you're someone who struggles getting the right fit with normal straps.

>>17124216
The issue for me is the gold. I’ve had issues with young aspiring doctors eyeing it and talking about how they could “run me for all I’ve got” I don’t think they realize it’s only a $600 watch.

>>17124228
Yeah I don't do gold. Stands out too much. That's why I put my 20k ring in a lockbox. I stick to stainless or bronze.

>>17124186
That tard shat on Rolex for years until he got one lmfao. Same story as every "microbrand" "low tier" whatever the fuck watch guy.

bought my first watch and now i immediately want to buy some others even though I can't afford it

>>17124252
What’d ya get?

>>17124259
seiko 5 automatic, lot of people recommended it and i really liked this brown one
i know its visibly used but I'm at least not scared to wear it

>>17124269
There’s nothing wrong with a watch looking worn. It gives them character.

>>17124269
Looks nice though, just don't buy any more shit if a watch this cheap is a strain on your wallet already. Just be patient.

>>17124269
great choice, very nice

How come you haven't been bitten by the vintage Omega bug, my friends?

>>17124334
If I saw something that really tickled my fancy I'd consider it but at present I just don't want to go down the vintage rabbit hole. I don't know a good watchmaker and am very wary of getting scammed with some frankenwatch abomination.

for me, it's the santos galbee

>>17124186
He's a poof.

>>17124343
I'd wear that if I were a woman

>>17124347
or if you could afford it

>>17124334
I have one but it looks ridiculously small on my fat wrists

>>17124343
Why do people make fun about Hublot's unaligned screws but never about Cartier's?

>>17124178

>>17124352
People do make fun of the Santos screws in this general

>>17124352
Here's Roger Smith on the topic
>The screws are never aligned because it would be a very difficult engineering task to make sure that the start of each thread within the dial plate began in exactly the same orientation ... the length of the screw thread from the start of its thread to the underside of the screw-head would be critical and you would have to achieve ridiculously close tolerances.

This is why there are even "misaligned" screws on Greubel Forseys and they're arguably some of the most competent technical watchmakers in the world. The Royal Oak is an exception because of some trickery where the "screws" are actually bolts and if you look at the underside of the case they are - shocker - not aligned. So they're really not an exception, they've just cleverly disguised it.

>>17124112
Which one boys?

>>17124360
why the stubby hands? I'd go left but there's not much in it.

>>17124350
>I have one but it looks ridiculously small on my fat wrists
How fucking fat are you, because lawyer anon is pretty obese himself.

>>17124360
Assuming the right has heat-blued hands, that one.

>>17124360
Both. But swap the bands.

>>17124360
Right but the blued hour and minute hands are pretty gaudy.

>>17124347
please be in London

>>17124366
My wrists are like 7.5 inches but I like a big watch

>>17124358

>>17124385
Those are not screws on the front, they are threaded tubes. It's just another trick like AP.

>>17124342
>I don't know a good watchmaker and am very wary of getting scammed
That's a very reasonable motive, however I can tell you that, down the rabbit vintage hole, there is a lot of fun ti be had.

>>17124350
Still, I woul really like if you posted a pic, m8.

>>17124360
White, no doubt.

>>17124125
And properly oriented.

>>17124388
these fucking niggers...

>>17124388
>$18k for that
Are the people running Chopard smoking crack?

>>17124127
It's very nice, but it reminds me of a Panerai a little too much.

>>17124360
Right

>>17124131
I'd go for the 275. The 283 is nice too but a bit too cold for my taste, and the 277 is a bit too subdued.

>>17124252
Stop while you still can.

>>17124334
I have, was considering one, luckily i went broke before i could go down that rabbit hole.

>>17124360
The blue one.

Can you imagine getting the call from the AD for the steel Daytona you've been waiting for years, almost shitting yourself of excitment while driving there, and being presented this monstrosity?
>black dial
>red markers
>arabic numerals
Looks like a mall shitter honestly.

>>17124410
Kino

>>17124422
It's so ugly it's become a future classic like the newman daytona. Maybe. That is seriously the most 90s watch I've seen this side of tag heuer, gross

>>17124422
I prefer this to a normal white one, they're boring.

>>17124360
Cocktail Time Manhattan

>>17124403
Only one I can find is selling for $6,700 right now. A bit of a bitch that it’s being sold for above msrp but it is still unworn.

>>17124252
>>17124406
It's over.

>>17124422
this but with regular baton indices would look pretty good

Unrelated, but I’m the coutura guy from above. Wish me luck bros, today my wife and I found out our second child is due the 10th of January

>>17124423
Starlight and Blue Planet are even more kino, but were limited editions so pretty much unobtainable.

>>17124456
Congratz!

>>17124112
I love chronographs

>>17124442
Have you considered a used GS maybe? There are plenty out there, i'm sure you haven't even seen many of them.

>>17124252
one of us. one of us.

>>17124476
To be completely honest I haven’t taken a look around the used market. I bought my seiko about a year ago, liked it quite enough and decided when I got a premium watch that I’d get a grand seiko. Since then I’ve been pouring over the catalogue and daydreaming about their watches. I’ve taken quite a liking to the elegance collection as they’re very simple lacking the date complication.

>>17124471
Check this out.

>>17124471
Enjoy your cancer

>>17124499
I will, thanks. It's only fitting for a watch you got by mailing in a cigarette carton and $88. I only have one after work or one in the morning on weekends. In the meantime I'll enjoy the test boost and nice nicotine buzz. Hopefully I'll be dead in 10 years anyways

>>17124466
Thanks, I appreciate it

>>17124403
I want a GS :(

>>17124471
love that cup

>>17124471
>2022
>smoking cigarettes

>>17124334
Most of them are shitty redials done by Pajeet or Kim

>>17124403
>>17124442
>$6,700
>for that

>>17124528
Yes. It’s one of 140 made.

>>17124533
I took two shits yesterday, I'll sell you one of two ever made for a $1000. You in?

>>17124542
You know it’s not that bad of a markup considering the other variants are priced at $4,800.

>>17124518
Thanks brother. Trans Am racing was so cool
>>17124523
Feelsgood

>buy my submariner from the early 90s that I've beaten to hell

>>17124573
>it's vintage!

watch id?

>>17124619
Kinda looks like a GMT Master

>>17124389
isnt this a womans watch

New furlan marri chronographs dropping tomorrow based on the names dials seems like they’ll be black/tan, red/gray, and brown. I’ll probably grab one if they’re cool looking

IT'S UP!!!

https://youtu.be/8y-R9E1lR9g

Any expectations, when it comes to the massive overhaul of Tiffany & Co's watches? Their entire watch lineup is being replaced / overhauled.

I imagine they will be keeping their staple items, like the CT60, relatively the same.

>>17124619
haha this guy. Did he fuck his niece, or did he just want people to think he did?

I like the Gucci grip

>>17124644
>furlan marri
Literally who

>>17124654
I really hope they release an automatic version, because this is one of the best intersections between minimalism and vibrant design.

>>17124654
I don't really have any expectations but they have the resources and the cachet to become a major player. I mean they're owned by LVMH for God's sake. Just have Bulgari give them high end ultra thin movements and they will sell like hot cakes. Steal chronograph movements from Zenith. They will print money.

>>17124664
How much

>>17124668
Brand new, this watch (the Atlas collection) is usually $2700. The steel band makes it $3200.

Used, and in great condition, it often runs for $1600-ish.

Their flagship men's watch, the CT60 is around $3500, and is much more conservative in its design.

>>17124667
I've always wondered why Tiffany & Co wasn't a larger player. Like you said, they could absolutely demolish the watch market if they took it more seriously. For now, outside of the CT60, they are comparatively unpopular as hell. Even the CT60 doesn't compare to the sales of the lower Oyster Perpetual.

>>17124670
Not bad, I'll be on the lookout. Thanks!

>>17124670
I should clarify: the Atlas collection is quartz, the CT60 is automatic. I believe the Atlas collection may have, or used to have, automatic options, but they are typically basic quartz.

>>17124667
>Just have Bulgari give them high end ultra thin movements and they will sell like hot cakes. Steal chronograph movements from Zenith
This is the way. Have Tiffany just make cases and bracelets. Bring back the Tiffany & Co dial collaborations on popular watches. Why the fuck is there not a Tiffany dial Bulgari Octo Finissimo?

>>17124654
>>17124664
im the tiffany guy from the last thread. Take a look at what LV brought to the Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève to get an idea of the direction they could go in. The relationship with Patek is still strong so i believe tiffany signed dials will still remain a thing between us. The CT60 may have outstayed its welcome, initial design was introduced in 1945 as a gift for FDR and was brought back to jumpstart modern tiffany watches. Initially they were made to be modular, offering a few different case metals, dials, bracelets, and straps you could pick from. Sales were not to the company's liking and they were actually discontinued once before but were brought back because of the lack of any other options. Im not expecting to see many tiffany blue dials on the new lineup, LV feels that the blue is only for elevated items and is cutting back on it within the company as a whole.

>>17124619
this is who the AD's give Rolexes too

>>17124690
he's pretty fly

>>17124269
you're so brave

Any preferred higher end / luxury smart watches? Tag Heuer's screens always look good, and they look like a good all purpose outdoorsy smart watch.

should i get a tudor or grand seiko

>>17124708
tudor if youre a normal person GS if your a fucking sewer mutant

>>17124708
rolex if youre a normal person tudor if your a fucking sewer mutant

i like date windows

citizen nb1050 or nb1060?

Why is there one thing I don't like about every single watch Sinn makes even though I really want a Sinn?

u mirin?

>have a genuine rolex submariner
>friend got a replica for $500
>compare them and I can barely tell the difference
have i been duped

>>17124739
jesus how white are you?

>>17124748
well i'm posting in a jewelry thread on 4chan......

>>17124746
hes already swapped watches with you bro

Is the SNKL23 a good choice? They're fairly cheap and I like the dial, and I especially like the look of it on a leather strap.

>>17124769
JUST

I want a casual green watch, automatic
any recommendations

>>17124779
Rolex Wimbledon dial, any model.

>>17124779

>>17124782
looks nice
>>17124781
im a poorcel budget is 1k shoulda said so

are microbrands scams?

>>17124793
Yes.

>>17124798
got it

>>17124800
why not just buy a rolex and be done?

>>17124186
Teddy is the one and only.

>>17124815
because you're annoying

what kind of watch should i wear if i look like picrel?

>>17124186
JOMW

>>17124830
This and any womans watch really.

>>17124830
Rolex
The cope watch brand when you're basic/ugly

>>17124830
Apple Watch (the latest version)

>>17124830
rolex

>>17124830
rolex

>>17124407
What were you considering, friendo?

>>17124525
True to some level, but you just have to lurk further.

>>17124637
Kek Of course not.

>>17124830
Some smartwatch shit.

should i get a cheap patek or a good rolex

>>17124830
rolex.

newest baby

also just got a beautiful suede leather band for my alpinist

>>17124845
Post models

>>17124844
>Omega 300hz
SEX
E
x

>>17124844
>>17124852
Both wicked choices

>>17124854
thanks mate

>>17124853
2501,1951 or a daytona

what kind of watch should i get if im in short sleeves most of the time
under 5k please

>>17124879
tudor pepsi gmt

>>17124881
looks good
placing my order now

>GMT bezel

>>17124845
For daily wear, I'd unironically get an entry level Rolex over any Patek.

Now that Grand Seiko has a unique selling point with their mechanical line (the dual impulse escapement), which of their new watches are a more attractive offering, the mechanical ones or the spring drive ones?

>>17124874
Damn better buy the Rolex

>Spring Drive!!!!!!!!

>>17124910
>>17124886
you really should kill yourself

who even wears corum

>>17124558
based ciggiebro

>>17124619
kek I have the exact same hat

should i?

But which is the best Rolex model and why?

>>17124886
What is wrong with GMT?

>>17125003
Nice Oysterquartz homage.

>>17124844
how do you like that omega? i'm considering getting a f300hz.

>>17124849
>>17124841
>>17124839
>>17124836
>>17124830
samefagging incels posting their lookalike
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmgZ8VMLRnk&ab_channel=WIRED
>biggest chad on the planet
>ex tag heuer brand ambassador
still he wears a rolex proudly
incels will never ever be able to compete
it's over for you incels forever, the rest is cope

>>17125028
>>biggest chad on the planet
>universally loved by women
You're looking in the wrong place

>>17124770
It's probably the best of them all.

>>17125043
of what? entry level seiko?

>>17124656
Fuck? How about made her pregnant.

>>17124663
Who is the girl on the left?

>>17124708
GS, you'll get bored of the Tudor quickly.

>>17124815
Kek this anon is personally responsible for ruining Rolex' reputation here.

Why is Tudor always in stock but Rolex is not?

>>17124844
>What were you considering, friendo?
I was just browsing our local online flea market and looking at some vintage hand wound models that could be had for around 300-500€. With the way things are going now i'm pretty much done with watch collecting anyway. If i'm lucky i'll soon get some money that i lent back and/or maybe even a job so i'll put some of it aside and buy a 62GS and maybe a Spring Drive (picrel) and then i'm done.

>>17124852
Cool, the date window is integrated very nicely in there, you barely notice it. To be honest i prefer the look of this over a standard Speedy.

>>17124903
I'd say spring drive, it has the smooth sweep and is easier to understand and explain to someone that doesn't have a clue about watches. Nobody really has a clue on how a normal escapement works let alone a dual impulse one.

>>17124619
What car is that?

>>17125043
Well I went through with buying it since stock is apparently limited for these again. I saw some people bitching about the gap between the case and the bracelet edge but I kind of like it actually. I'll probably be putting a thick leather band on it that will take up the space anyway.

Is brown leather a bad combo if I'm wearing a black jacket btw? Pretty much all my jackets are black with the occasional medium grey.

>>17125045
Well yes, that is what anon is interested in.

>>17125089
brown does not go with black. That's like fashion 101

>>17125089
>Is brown leather a bad combo
It's the best combo if you ask me.

Could someone explain Omega's price point to me? It makes no fucking sense.
Why is the Seamaster 300, which has a rotating bezel (ceramic or titanium), 300m water resistance and an helium valve, LESS EXPENSIVE than the Aqua Terra?
All of these watches have the same movement (caliber 8800).

>>17125093
If it's good enough for Jack Forster it's good enough for anyone.
https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/a-seventy-five-dollar-watch-that-looks-like-a-million-bucks

>>17125093
wrong

>>17125097
literal nobody

>>17125093

>>17125096
demand?

>>17125097
Who?

>>17125097
Jack Forster is a dummy

>>17125103
That would be stupid.
The better the specs, the more expensive the watch.

>1 day until I pick up my BB58
Fuck, can't wait

>>17125096
I was thinking about getting a Seamaster before the largest recent price hike. The change killed my interest in one night, guess I just don't think it's at all worth that kinda money.

>>17125128
I'm going to hold off for about 2 or 3 months to get one.

do nh35 dials have the same feet as eta 2824 dials?

>>17125054
Maria Pia, wife of F1 driver Clay Regazzoni

>>17125099
>>17125104
>>17125105
Editor in chief at Hodinkee.

>>17125138
She looked good back then.

What are some good skull watches?

>>17125135
i dunno but that dial sux dix

>>17125003
I'm thinking the same, but I'd take the ladies version because 40mm is large for a golden watch

>>17125155

>>17125003
>>17125157
It's colored steel.
If you want a golden watch, buy one made of gold.
If you can't afford a gold watch, buy a steel one.

>>17125155
just get a watch you like engraved

>>17125105
Well yes he probably is.

>>17125172
Rolex on one hand, a chainsaw in the other hand.

>>17125172
I hate americans so fucking much

>>17125128
Buy a used one from Japan. Half price and in perfect condition. They take care of their shit and dramatically under-rate their watches.

What in the US would be "mint condition! unworn!" in Japan would be "shabby. only good for parts."

>>17125172
That looks good, how much?

>>17125201
34mm Air Kings are cheap. That engraving costs more than the watch.

>>17125156
no it doesnt

>>17125135
No, they do not. However, any watch maker can cut the feet off and attach it with dial dots.

>>17125172
That's really impressive work. I bet that guy could just buy up Air Kings, engrave them and sell them for a massive profit endlessly.

>>17124186
The Pontiff, obviously

>>17125172
Looks great on the clasp and bezel, leave the case and the bracelet untouched

>>17125098
anon...

>>17125286
Why do male boots have heels, you will never be a woman.

>>17125289
>Why do male boots have heels,
It's a throwback to when boots were worn by horsemen. The heel slots in nicely in a stirrup.

>>17125294
I know that, but most men don't ride horses while wearing these. I can't walk normally in any shoes with even a slight heel. Heels should be only for women, and even they should wear them as little as possible, it ruins their feet.

>>17125204
>34mm Air Kings are cheap. That engraving costs more than the watch.
Lol I seriously doubt it. It can't cost more than a few hundred can it? The engraving not the watch, obviously Rolex is expensive.

>>17125172
Now I feel like ruining my watch too.

>>17125296
>I can't walk normally in any shoes with even a slight heel.
monty python detected

>>17125307
It would be trivial to copypaste a design on the watch, don't they engrave it with mini dentist drills? Like, it's not such a complex process, is it?

tell me why I should wear anything other than my SKX007 on my collection of nato straps

>>17125312
I'm sure you could do it with a laser engraving machine in a few hours.

>>17124112
>Fall for the automatic meme
>WFH so don't wear it everyday
>Time goes out of sync
>Can't be bothered to fix it every time I go out so never wear it

>>17125306
https://www.etsy.com/shop/TheWatchEngraver

a few hundred for a basic design looks like

>>17125327
what is WFH

>>17125332
work from home. did you never hear that during covid?

>>17125332
Will fuck homosexuals

>>17125335
never. miss me with your gay covid acronyms

engraving makes it look like some cheap knockoff idk what you guys are seeing

>>17125328
That dude is fucking horrible, if you check the shading etc. it looks like an amateur prison tattoo artist with zero talent. That's why you fucking make a detailed design in Illustrator first.

>Paying over 1000 for ANY Seiko
L
O
L

>>17124692
For a white guy

>>17125328
>>17125355
Pic related, just compare it to that Rolex in >>17125172 - I guess retards on Etsy will really buy anything.

There was a Russian/Ukrainian/whatever guy on Etsy who did it 20000x better but he doesn't make anything anymore, probably got beheaded.

>>17125358
Rolex always wins baby.

>>17125362
Not really, the Russian dude did it on Seikos and whatnot.

>>17124112
Test

>>17125296
>admitting that you can't even figure out how to walk properly
I knew this thread was full of retards, but this is really something else.

>>17125306
>It can't cost more than a few hundred can it?
Yes, I'd bet that engraving cost about the same as the watch. High end engraving (no, not the type done by some retard with Parkinson's on etsy for $100) is extremely time consuming, difficult, and most of all importantly aren't many people who do it anymore. The subject is fascinating historically but I find it quite tacky on a watch. I certainly wouldn't turn down a Holland & Holland though.

>>17124953
Pinched a nerve, didn't he?

ATTENTION

ATTENTION

THIS IS NOT A DRILL

DAYTONA PRICES IN FREE FALL DOWN FROM $50K IN FEBRUARY TO $35K OR LOWER

ROLEX PRICES CRASHING

5711 DOWN 25%

OVERSEAS DOWN 28%

LANGE PRICES ARE UP

WAITING LIST FAGS ON SUICIDE WATCH

>>17125418
Is the mythical Rolex price correction finally happening? After years...is the suffering finally over?

Good morning sirs, got a pair of slim fit jeans over the weekend. Think the color goes nicely with this polo shirt and white af1's

>>17125080
>>17125086
>Sproooooong Drive

>>17125364
It's not working, try again.

>>17125407
I can walk just fine in normal flat shoes, heels are for fags.

I really like this one.

>>17125411
>High end engraving (no, not the type done by some retard with Parkinson's on etsy for $100) is extremely time consuming, difficult, and most of all importantly aren't many people who do it anymore.
Moron, it's not that difficult or time consuming at all.

>>17125418
wtf only 3x retail??? cant wait to pick one up for 3000 bucks in two more weeks

opinions on the SZSB012? It's on sale on amazon for $189

>>17124972
I do, and here it is: my happy face watch.
>Corum Classical Flyback Chronograph Big Date

>>17125018
Excellent affordable watch. The smooth second hand is gorgeous, BUT be sure to find one in good working condition before exchanging any money.

>>17125080
>With the way things are going now i'm pretty much done with watch collecting anyway.
This saddens me. Hope you can get on your feet again, friend. I'm not a fan of Spring Drive, but I'm sure you can acomplish your goal in less time that you think. Cheers.

>>17125446
It's an okay watch, I'll give you that. But the engraving gives you no tactical advantage whatsoever. Unless you were planning to auction it off as a collector's item.

>>17125418
Love it. Hope grey market sellers and "investors" lose their fucking ass on them

>>17125327
>Can't be bothered to fix it every time I go out
Why?

>>17125460
Looks decent for that money. The bracelet is probably ass and it'd look better on a strap anyway.

>>17125478
>no tactical advantage whatsoever
Are you in a warzone, anon?

>>17125461
Nice happy face.

>>17125461
Well thanks for the encouraging words. I have 8 watches but most of the time i just wear one because it's a pure auto and i don't want it to stop. I do switch it up a bit more lately, bracelets are comfier in the summer and i don't want to ruin the straps just yet with my sweat.

>>17125458
unironic cope rolex tranny, your time is up

>>17125449
>Moron, it's not that difficult or time consuming at all.
Post your engraving work. I'm sure you're an expert since it's not difficult or time consuming at all, right?

>>17125327
I tried to tell you to get quartz

New furlan marri chronos look sick I don’t know which I want. I’m thinking this one

Anyone copped any prime day deals?

>>17125532
>a scale even more useless than a tachymeter or pulsometer
Impressive. Very nice. Can't believe people fall for this shit

>>17125532
It looks dope but it eould be even better if it had a pulsometer instead of a breathometer.

>>17124112
whats a schizocore watch?

Hows this waveceptor look? Micro adjusted it a few days ago so it fits nice.

>>17125551
A G-Shock but DEFINITELY NOT a Bluetooth one.

>>17125551
F-91W

>>17125556
not into that design, too small
>>17125553
any particular recs? $200 budget max

Pls respond

>>17122993

Pls respond


>>17125559

>>17125551
depends on your flavor of schizo you are but I could see someone rocking the pope watch

>>17125539
>>17125542
they do have one coming with a pulsometer but I don't like how the one subdial throws off the symmetry

>>17125573
Yes, buy it in black.

>>17125479
Do you even realize the margin flippers are making?
The GMT Master II retail price is 10k€, they're selling for 25k€ right now. Even if flippers made 2k€ out of it, that would still be an insane profit.
Take a look at pic related. Price are dropping yes, but we're still far from pre-COVID price where Rolex already sold for way more than their MSRP.

>>17125424
Nice stain, Chris Tucker.

>>17124663
Bunch of lesbians I tell ya.

Das up!

https://youtu.be/2MNDQe9MML0

I need tilted dial watch recommendations.

just ordered one of those new seiko GMTs

>>17125642
I don't care.

>>17125320
No there is none. I should have stayed there lol

>>17125564
>not into that design, too small
found the fat

>>17125663
huh? i just like the bulky g shock designs, faggot

>>17125584
I feel like wearing the pope watch is way too deliberate. Like really, why does someone take that and not the F91W?

>>17124953
based advice
>>17124910
the mountain jew fears the samurai

>>17125003
eh
>>17125166
Basically this. Unless it's clearly a joke watch (no one thinks your casio calculator watch is actually made of gold) it moves into dangerous try-hard territory where you look like a rube who thinks he's convinced you he's actually sporting a gold watch, stay away

.
>>17125551
Something mechanical. I wouldn't trust electric crystal watches

>>17125552
anyone?

What's a good gold dress watch? I was thinking a tank of some kind, maybe as a christmas present to myself

>>17125682
Vacheron Constantine traditional

>>17125684
Maybe next year....

>>17125689
just get it on credit bro

>>17125696
that reminds me I need to finally get a credit card

>>17125680
It looks ok, maybe a tad too big.

>>17125689
Master Ultra Thin
Small Seconds
Is a bit cheaper, might find one used that's not too much more than a tank. Which is hardly any gold, it's just like a smidgen of gold on the edges. VC did a white and yellow gold version also, maybe you can find a used one. Most of the market is rose gold atm

>>17125682
If you can afford a Louis Cartier tank, get that. Don't buy a cope tank.

>>17125552
Nice fit but we can't see the actual watch too well

>>17124852
here it is

>>17125098
>>17125102
utter shit tier fits

>>17125714
how much do alpenists go for now? Regret missing out when they were still in regular production.

>>17125730
they go from anywhere of $600-700

multiple variants now as well, but the green dial always gets me pictures don't do it justice

>>17125696
Is there a watch like this but quartz and for 1/100 of the price? Obviously not of gold lol

>>17125631
Shit, never noticed that in the picture. Guess it was bad lighting? No stain here

>>17125736
>Is there a watch like this but quartz and for 1/100 of the price?
No.

So why did Seiko discontinue all their actual decent looking watches <$1000? The Presage line in particular has taken a massive nosedive but their divers aren't looking great these days either.

new thread
>>17125751
>>17125751
>>17125751
>>17125751
>>17125751

>>17125706
I'll probably get a Cartier tank or a Dos Santos, but I'd like a gold watch, all of my regular watches are Silver coloured (steel)

>>17125283
i want to suck off archie so much

>>17125155
Bulova Maquina 46mm

>Swiss made

>homage

>>17126538
oops forgot the meme

>>17125492
Because it;s boring af and wastes valuable time of your life. Fuck you nerds for shilling this useless technology to me.

>>17126567
your life was never valuable, so stop bitching and set the watch in 10 seconds

>>17126604
No, you autists owe me a free winder for shilling that shit

Greetings /fa/ I come to you from /sp/ in need of some help. Would anyone know what watch this is? It used to be my grandmother's and I am trying to determine the value and to see if it's even a real seiko watch.

>>17126813
Backside. It still works but I could not find any ref number

>>17126786
buy one yourself, klarstein winders used for smuggling drugs(probably) are like 20€ a pop, when they usually cost 150+
also winders are useless shit, unless you have a perpetual calendar, just jiggle your arms fatso

>>17126813
>>17126820
not sure on the exact model, but it won't be valuable if your plan was to sell it

>>17125736
Seiko Dolce SACM150